come on, now is the time, i'm telling you as a woman, open it. mom, put it on before we change our minds. ahead

of one linear distance from the fixed platoon straight the rest to the right. steps

hello welcome to all who are now with us very happy to see the guests of our program. as we can see that some of our experts

will join in the conversation today. we are looking forward to vadimagin. and there are many topics that i want to discuss and understand, these are the vectors along which our region and our entire global space are developing today. well let's start here what is there, uh, the ukrainian regime. uh, suddenly decided to roll out personal sanctions against our colleagues - this is alexander shpakovsky, this is grigory azarenok. our says tour. this is stv agent director alexander osenko. and vadim feel sorry or be happy for his colleagues. looked, that colleagues note precisely. congratulatory telegrams to each other. well, listen, we are already used to this and understand that as a rule, or rather, they always mark the most worthy with sanctions, these are worthy people who serve the fatherland, who in the twentieth did not cave in, who previously showed themselves with dignity and we will not succumb to sanctions pressure, but we will demonstrate confidence that we are acting in accordance with the national

interests of our own country and are capable, despite sanctions, of developing and responding to these sanctions with dignity, well, indeed, our colleagues ironic on this account, it is at least. yes, and there someone can attach a stronger word. i think from this list you understand who ah. well, here we go again. here is a similar topic. uh, for the sake of freshness, they called for severing relations with belarus sounds loud, but then we read who exactly and we see that the deputy of the verkhovna rada aleksey goncharenko is famous. well freak er, to put it mildly, so to speak. and the verkhovna rada, in the politics of ukraine, was informed by the creation of a petition calling for breaking off diplomatic relations with the minsk interent, comrade to take this seriously. well, this is first, not the first attempt not the first statement and uh, of course, uh. members are happy individual members are happy, they are always trying to, uh, pr. and i think it's um. if this

can be called an event, it should be attributed precisely to the category of personal pr, nothing more, uh, extraordinary plenipotentiary, the village of ukraine continues to work in minsk, uh, no official statements are made. that is, it is absolutely uh, one or two days. uh, you understand the news, everyone agrees with it, so we just throw it aside, then we send such news and such politicians to the trash, but this is already the case. not we. this is already being done. the story itself is much more disturbing things much more disturbing messages are coming hmm from western. what is called the flanks, and in the dutch port flissing oil is thrown by american other equipment tanks abrams infantry fighting vehicles bradley and self-propelled howitzers paladin approximately 1.250 units from the netherlands. the equipment goes to lithuania and poland to strengthen the eastern flank. nato technology. it’s not just offensive with high cross-country ability,

which is clearly not for the defense of europe, plus duda’s decision to transfer a company of leopard-2 tanks to kiev as part of an international coalition, plus a macron with amx wheeled tanks and the british with challenge tanks. and here's nikolai evgenievich these people will point the finger at the regional group saying that their teachings threaten regional security. you even gave your thoughts a clear understanding of what is happening. uh, i’m used to, uh, operate with numbers and talk about specific events about specific events, if the previous moment, when the break in relations was a fake, you can call it differently , then here the reality of thousands of pieces of equipment came to the limit territory. they are moving towards our borders. uh, but all this must be considered. all in all, in the context of the purchase, the planned purchase of poland, thousands of units of tanks for example. at

the moment, france has 406 objects in its composition, only germany 220 great britain 227 and germany 248, these are the numbers that exist in europe today, the reality of more or less modern technology. i plan to talk about 1,000 tanks. the question is why and who definitely needs them, not to stand near our borders and drink coffee here in neighboring poland, lithuania or estonia, these are definitely attacking means. and most importantly, these are modern facilities. and for some reason, we are talking only about armored vehicles ; artillery means have been added to this equipment; patriots are already against air defense. they say if anyone can, uh, anti-tank weapons and all sorts of kits of everything that is possible. this is a forecast, but in my opinion,

aviation will come to a stop only in one, in order to use aviation, long-term training of pilots is necessary. and if we talk about the saturation of the ukrainians, after all, yes, they have digested such a volume of equipment, which, in general, well, the last class, what it is called that you need to learn it you need to be able to use. uh, it means that in ukraine today we are talking not only about ukraine , today we are talking about a united west , including experts from western military specialists who, under the guise of mercenaries, are ready to fight in ukraine and, in my opinion, all this equipment will be found crews and necessary specialists. and the most, probably, terrible thing is that practically any features are transferred in an escalating situation ; we are talking not only about defense. as they said today we are no longer talking about any. means

of some kind of anti-tank is not a means of protection there is a real question about the means of attack by any means to develop russia on the battlefield. that is, once again for the infantry video. yes, too, once again for the most naive. yes, that is, it’s not russia, ukraine is fighting, but in reality it’s a war between the west and russia, if anyone doesn’t understand it, it still wasn’t enough for themselves. there is also. yes, surprisingly, we are talking about the fact that the united west, through the hands of ukraine, is trying to weaken russia while destroying, belarus as an ally of the russian federation that the republic of belarus has never threatened. we always say that this is a regional grouping of forces, united with russia in order to deter in the event of aggression, so we are developing this grouping, according to plan. eh? you know, in 2021, uh, vgs,

approved the updated military doctrine of the union state, which we’ll already say now, so even the head of state said that it’s even becoming outdated, because events are developing very dynamically and uh, we, uh, are responding to the possible threats that here e are formed by such actions. uh, west well, look. and why did he ask specifically about the ukrainians in terms of the supply of weapons, because we are seeing that more and more generals, including you retired abroad, say that there are at least two factors. why equipment is not being transferred very well, for example, to ukraine for example, a retired british royal air force air vice-marshal says the first destruction of equipment on the territory of ukraine is a blow to the reputation of manufacturers, how then to sell these weapons to say that they are the best, and the second point is that in order to use these machines, the ukrainians will have to go through a long training. and i

’ll add a third point, which for some reason i didn’t say again that it was about what the uk does not have. uh, normal serious ground forces and any transmission, so to speak. to whomever there were means of destruction, including tanks. this is a blow to their own armed forces, which are very difficult for them to replenish. welcome to our program. well, we are now talking about the fact that the transfer colossal forces that a-a concentrated before. mostly in ukraine now in the immediate vicinity of our borders. here is your prediction. this is a provocation in order to escalate tension or is still preparing to strike in the near future. everyone thinks that poland is not ready for war and is not going to fight anymore, if we are talking about some kind of political action. they need to be considered in the context of the upcoming election campaign. well, in addition, you need to understand that nato e is not ready for a big war with the russian federation respectively, all this

talk about the fact that in ukraine russia is directly at war with nato in ukraine, russia is still with the ukrainians with the ukrainian armed forces, respectively, as a union state. but it’s just that nato supplies them in ukraine, not a full-fledged division, not a brigade. yes, we see large deliveries of weapons, they are hundreds of units, these are quite high-quality weapons, they seriously affect the course of hostilities, and naturally there is military-political maneuvering in the region and from poland from the baltics, but while the main strategy of the west is to inflict a military defeat on the territory of ukraine to the russian federation, and the transfer of hostilities to the territory of belarus in the near future. well , no one like me, as we see, and they do not plan for analysis. it is possible only as an armed provocation. in the event that russia conducts a new major offensive operation there or , let’s say from the ukrainian side in order to stretch the front, it’s possible, well, firstly, we shouldn’t discount that it’s more

so strengthened today, and in military-technical terms, uh, it has a good infrastructure for additional overload of troops, which is a potential threat, however , there is coming from poland and in the near future more will be able to independently carry out, and operations of the local range, so they are ready to have the ability to question what is natural, we expect to the fact that, given its capabilities and the allied state and other threats that, e, potential may be from the side of the allied state, including a nuclear umbrella, they do not decide about ukraine ukraine was initially supervised by, uh, western experts, including the military. there were a lot of advisers who were introduced to the highest officers of the ukrainian army. there's a question. do zelensky's guards have their own people, besides? uh, the cia and other things, so understand that today the west is collective, using, a first of all, the manpower of ukraine a,

dropping old equipment, they are at war with the russian federation, but at the same time, because this is a matter of existential threat. they will amplify to the maximum extent. uh, apu with the aim of inflicting defeat on the russian federation and under the guise of pmcs of private lysed mercenary structures. the regular officers of the nato troops can calmly participate in this operation, but still i would note that poland is currently not ready to conduct any independent large-scale operations and will not be ready for the next 2-3 years. we see this in the planning of the polish armed forces, therefore, as for the junk that is dumped there, find out such junk, 232, as at least, and the howitzers that the americans supplied are 155 mm, with the old 105 mm last year for a million shells, but this is not quite such a story. i want to say, well, in the development of the topic, two interesting messages. here is one side. ukraine has planned themselves from the

world. there, he flat on february 24, promises that he will present a plan for a peaceful settlement , well, of course, what you saw, but on the other hand at the same time, the secretary general. nato stoltenberg makes the same statement normalizing relations with western countries with russia will not come even after the end of the conflict in ukraine that's how to understand it, it means that russia simply does not have another chance, except for these until the end hmm what's the reality? uh, the script is already written, it is already written, it is anticipated in life and in this script. the main protagonist from the point of view of the warring country so far is that ukraine and its forces in any way how to fight to the last ukrainians, but stoltenberg expresses a united interest. or, so to speak, the position of the west, and it clearly says that so far we will not achieve our own goals set in ukraine, we will not stop, but the main goal. what weakening of russia is not.

well, that's a long way off. dismemberment, according to the documents, and the initial uh two to the twentieth year, the strengthening of russia in the region and the contraction. it becomes a centripetal force, taking into account its influence in the cis countries. for the 20th year, 22, they planned the separation of ukraine, including the option of a military conflict; 24, russia was one of the scenarios. but this is the scenario that is written. let's talk then about reality, but reality. this is the nato strategy that was adopted literally last year, where it is written what they want, and it clearly says that the main enemy is russia, the main ones. so let's say the second china well, my opponent, but the main strategic competitor. let's proceed from this, as a rule, nato acts according to its documents. and it does justice to the plays. for a long time we

have already talked about this more than once, to which i bring evgenievich to this, so join the conversation to the fact that the world is frozen in such expectation that right there in april in august once this peace talks happen. they are finally talking, but we hear in parallel from those who constantly push the back of the ukrainians that even if peace happens, we will still continue. here is the confrontation. after all, today in ukraine it is being played out. uh, the element has remade the world about it. it is clear to all analysts. e specialist, anyone and until it is resolved. the main task do not stop. well, what is happening here, uh, neither side in the twenty-second year has reached its strategic b goals accordingly, in order to move to political regulation. they must demonstrate strength and inflict some kind of visible and presented to the world community a major military defeat, so that from a position of strength they impose on the other side one or another

negotiation about the final goals. the west is there or the collapse of russia, the relaxation of russia it seems to me that they still do not need to exaggerate them. uh, some kind of such a malicious one that they sit for 10 years ahead. there, maybe someone thinks so, but those who make the decision they are to a large extent you have encountered they are situational react, adjusting to the situation, of course, they do not want to defeat russia if this leads to the collapse of russia. they are even further, and not how they analyze. and how to manage these disintegrated. yes, they are facing so many new tasks , answers to which they do not know about nuclear weapons and interethnic conflicts and so on, but most importantly, they already consider. so i want so we see it is written that 22 years old, as they think. with became the year of the political defeat of russia, and then they are already move gradually to the next target china and now they are thinking how to integrate russia into these new plans of theirs. in what form, therefore, it is not in vain that statements are made that

european architecture, security, and so on and so forth are impossible without russia. these two tracks are the classic american policy of pressure, that is, a whip and some kind of diplomatic traps, but at the moment i want to designate the first one. uh, unfortunately, i am stating the fact that i have already provoked this special military us provocation in europe, they have already achieved their goals, certain geopolitical ones have weakened russia, weakened its influence in the central asian region e. there are quite strong forces in the middle east. i will finish. i mean, i left russia quite strongly here in the region. first second. and the fact that the military operation will end sooner or later. naturally, we count on it. we ourselves count on the victory of the russian federation but they are not going to stop on the issue of economic containment sanctions policies, and they are trying to strengthen. uh, the backlog of russia in terms of dark technology. at the same time, the americans will also play on contradictions. it's the perfect

scenario for them. still, the expansion of the escalation of this conflict, and, but we must prevent this, therefore, they not only want to limit themselves to ukraine and not only to us completing this military operation in the foreseeable future, but up to drawing poland and the ranks of other you strangely into this conflict absolutely true about the threats that concern us and as for the exodus of the company in ukraine , what will be reflected in it is quite obvious, but this confirms the basis and again the head of the estonian foreign ministry urs, reinsal at a webinar recently, and the strategies of the democratic forces of belarus the head of the estonian foreign ministry we are very important how the democratic forces will live in belarus said that he connects the democratization of belarus with the outcome of the war in ukraine like this, therefore everything, like everything that is unfolding on the territory of ukraine, concerns us directly, if we proceed from the most favorable for us the scenario, then we will not take the necessary actions from the favorable scenario in advance, but we must see the obvious things,

that is, it is impossible, uh, and our analysis to draw along the line of such a constant escalation. first , the west is afraid of a direct clash with the russian federation, our security officials spoke about this. we remember the briefing and the chairman of the state security committee and our military why because they carried out in the west, simulation of russian strategic e, forces, they are in good condition. we see the received poseidon torpedo and in the event if there really is a threat to the russian federation a. either the direct involvement of nato troops russia is ready to use all the forces of deterrence that they have, they understand this very well, they are afraid of a direct collision. they understand that the invasion of the territory of the republic of belarus by force. nato, this will mean, according to our military doctrine, an invasion of the territory of an allied state. and by their actions. they are very afraid. that's when the rockets flew in and some statements,

when the pranksters, dud called, and so on. that is the west manages the risks primarily the risks of nuclear war. we see nuclear war. they do not want to. yes, respectively, they are trying to defeat the existing economic yes diplomatic military forces, but why did the west not reach the goal, talking about belarus this topic, which pops up the rupture of relations between belarus and russia , the destruction of the integration community, the destruction of our military union was and is one of the strategic civilizations of the west and she not only failed. yes, but as a result of a special military operation. they we saw that we began to cooperate even more. well, well, i want to say that well, it’s no coincidence that this idea is such a loud statement about timir dan himself, how can it be carried out without the participation of the russian federation of the people’s republic of china and where uh hmm on the other hand. er, of course, uh,

we also know the price of some international agreements, including the minsk e agreements. uh, here are the statements of merkel landa, which, by the way, played very much in favor of, probably, the russian federation and. well, in some kind of psychological ideological plan to support even e svo. we see the price of these agreements with whom to negotiate today, therefore, of course. it 's worth the task. uh, this is causing some damage to the russian federation, uh, of course, you know, and the resolutions of the us congress of the european parliament have been repeatedly adopted, where it is written in plain text that the west does not suit the union state, therefore, of course, uh,

an attempt to rebel. uh, 2020 was not a success, we survived and now the task, of course, uh, is to continue to continue to strengthen the belarusian states. in a very interesting continuation, sociology came from the european union almost half of the inhabitants of the eu countries 48% are in favor of the war in ukraine ending as soon as possible, and these polls, which were conducted in nine countries, and without the young and serbia, as it were already were even more revealing, so most of all, the speedy end of hostilities, and even at the cost of ukraine's territorial losses, although there are more than 60% austrians and germans. and approximately the same sentiments are also among the greeks among the italians spaniards. that is, people get tired very simply these countries, as the most prosperous for many years, most of all felt on themselves that

life can become worse, and they felt it not only because prices increased, household expenses increased, it became harder to live, and europe got used to it. live well for decades at the expense of the price of gas on other means. so let's say, for cheap energy and so on, it is these people, when i always see all decisions go through you personally, if your life has become worse, then you must find it. the reason to get out of this situation. the reason is the sleep of the up helping ukraine, the war in ukraine and all the powerful e here about ukrainian propaganda in the european union, still the vast majority. why with you in order to show that those impulses that russia gave readiness for negotiations, they do not veil and distort in their own information space , and this one they will pass

off as ready-made ukraine on those conditions. they put forward some conditions there 10 points peace. they present them as the only possible. the only fair ones, but it is obvious that when one side absolutely does not want to listen to the position of the other and the realities that already exist today, it is impossible to come to any agreements, so they understand they are talking, and here i did not want to say everything this happens and involuntarily thought about it. and look , there is zelensky who does not want any negotiations at all, he has already said many times about this, then suddenly more figures appear. the man who well i'll call it beautiful of course, it’s not beautiful, but it went into some kind of parallel, and before that, to say that by saying that he is not against participating in the presidential race in parallel, medvedchuk has some kind of article of his own there. she is famous in the platform. maybe this is also prepared, but these are still different situations, as for the arrest officer, there is no need to pump up and overestimate this figure of the arrest officer - this is a

political adventurer and his entire biography. she's shaping up like that, he's got situational support based on what he's one of the most popular bloggers, but his adventurism is evidenced by the fact that he is some kind of adviser to the office, as if at work. he does not belong there. he wrote a statement there , stating that he seems to be, as if he had nothing to write, and does not receive retribution. that is, this is a typical political do not give. well , you understand, who is behind him, behind them are some large groups, as for medvedchuk, uh, ukrainian propaganda and the current government managed to create an image for him. about the russian figure, he was deprived of citizenship altogether. that is, what is on the territory the russian federation will see a consolidation of forces opposing zelensky. it's true. and this is a serious force that cannot be underestimated, because if you look at the statistics. how many people left ukraine and how many left, including for the territory of the russian federation, to us, then these are hundreds of thousands of people on the territory of ukraine itself , there are still hundreds of thousands, and maybe

millions of people who share these pro-russian sentiments for this audience medvedchuk may count, well understandable in the current situation. this is a political figure significant only in the territory that is not under the control of the regime. eh, zelensky and in terms of a peaceful settlement, again. let's get straight to the new major armed confrontation. whether it is a head-on battle, or an offensive operation by one of the parties, but you are talking about some serious peaceful steps, but this is not why they throw weapons there. that 's the continuation. well, you know, i didn't feel like talking, but still. in my opinion. again, returning to the thought of the price agreement. yes, it's probably more there will be cover. e new arms supplies. e strengthening the armed component in a bevel. yes, yes, it’s clear to viewers when everyone

asks a question, when will there be negotiations , negotiations, perhaps in the next case, when one of the parties is so weakened that it cannot, but effectively, there is resistance not only militarily, but economically and so on and forced to negotiate. that is, you need to agree to the conditions for this, the correct vadim frantsevich. said there must be one more round, but unfortunately, a maybe not one, unfortunately, we most likely one round i will not limit myself to the second question. if one of the parties can either convince or force the beneficiary to back down, yes, and this is by the states, if the russian federation well, it is somehow effective, well, the russian federation can be in the union with its own, and partners in the international dialogue could be forced by other steps , united stagensax to abandon this project to destabilize europe but it's even more difficult because they have invested money in it. and this long term planning until either one side is weakened or the beneficiary is not interested in escalating. this conflict will continue colleagues another big one. let's get closer to us

. yes, everything is correct . we outlined it absolutely correctly, but on the context, but i’ll start sorting out a very important issue from afar. e. here we are saying, look at this question of ordinary europeans. we see what they want, of course, as usual people. they want peace, they want the usual quiet life, but at the same time with this while we see that politicians in the west. they obviously use pills, azurin. uh, our nearest western neighbors are also poland and lithuania, because otherwise, how to perceive only they behave. and grants, throwing them, uh, into our territory through this fence , often already inanimate, here on january 12, the last case when three corpses were on the border between belarus and poland in parallel. we see that the european court of human rights allowed poland to send illegal migrants back to belarus, we conclude that further, most likely, they will give a license to shoot these people. why not? is it going to be an illogical continuation and then we

move on quite right, and none of this is a toss-up . yes, in parallel, we remember the words of the barel, and in a wonderful garden and jungle, we understand that, probably, we need to understand that in the eyes of the west, not only africans, they are only separately afghans, but also russian belarusians. ukrainians are also the jungle and here it is smooth. i am approaching the question that, in general, alexander lukashenko proposed to the whole society during christmas when he spoke in the temple and said, maybe now is the time to make a step forward for those at least. who realized who left just on a wave of emotions or who is ready to bear the graceful knitting of these two topics? yes why did you go? i want to say that this question, either already trying to answer saw here, or a link. there will be a straight line soon as we see the signals. what are these? uh, how can a certain number of our citizens leave, right? let's look at it objectively as well. they are there settled down. no, look at what criticism is

coming, but these runaway structures that all sorts of things have been created there, there are offices, some kind of cabinets , any interview that is going on from their side is just a flurry of negative comments why, but many people know, firstly , someone went, the future on the wave of such political euphoria, a year has already passed, the second nothing changes. and these ideological euphoria has passed from them, they call them there these, but the newly called neophytes and so on others. we thought they would ride on a political wave, we will decide economic issues there, life has become worse, few people have begun to live better. see what's happening. we see more than one case when they go there, but to treat their teeth to buy glasses. it means getting medical attention. come here the question arises. on what basis, if you continue to enjoy the benefits of the belarusian state, do you have a belarusian passport? so you then

decide on your position. we've made a special request here. now here is a small block to illustrate to our viewers. that is not our survey. we looked at the opposition resource on purpose, because they saw that they were also trying to screw things up. and how did people react, being in poland, or these words of the belarusian president. they were probably disappointed, because the vast majority have either already returned or are about to return their thoughts. let's see. now let's listen to a certain alexander, a major developer of these companies. here. he said he and his wife spent 9 months in exile. there were two reasons for leaving. the first war. in ukraine, the second customer of the project is not wanted to cooperate with belarusian offices. we decided to relocate to turkey, then the idea came to move to poland, but we realized that it would be financially difficult for us to live there. as a result, when you returned to belarus , there is always a risk that they can come and arrest you. but when i arrived in minsk, i even began

to sleep better. my wife and i want to live in belarus , here is our home, not our selection for those who are trying to teach us that we are rigged facts , this is a person on an opposition resource, he says his thoughts. you know no one there, and my position is as follows. i would clearly explain that a house is a house. this is where the walls help. and this is understood by most people and the message of the president, which we all heard, we all heard, but thank god people heard from behind the cordon. come back here waiting for you. you made a mistake, but the motherland is ready to forgive you. this is the first message, the second message. eh, no one needs anyone anywhere, except at home, if you work here, you work, you find your niche in public life. here you can develop and achieve a certain borders and certain heights. what

this young man is talking about, i hope, who went abroad and is engaged in going into the sphere. many. who left. today they realized that, and it would be better for them in belarus that life in belarus is not the same way. no worse. let's just say the phrase is no worse than in europe and most importantly. he is here, a citizen, protected in many respects, on many issues, and the state is ready. give him a guarantee. here's a couple more examples. something from their forums, something, again, and everything is solid taken from not about state resources, which means that a couple of quotes from fifteen to twenty acquaintances of it people who are satisfied with the move are 3-4 people. the rest would like to go back, but they can't, some participated in the actions, they are afraid of being detained, others got a new job abroad. further. i think the situation in belarus is being escalated so that ukraine will transfer part of the troops to the north. this is how he thinks, and the reconciliation of the war of accounting

specialties is a formality, when he arrived in minsk, he even began to sleep better in batumi , we often remembered minsk, they said that we the street is wider the services the products are better the situation with the possible detention also didn't frighten on the march, and they walked. in the end, we decided to return. and finally, one of my friends has returned. and for the photo in the phone he ended up for a day, and after leaving the isolation ward. he decided not to leave again. he said his own, he had already served time about them, they even tried to manipulate the president's statement. he urged to come, but said that those who committed the crime will answer, and anyway they will speak clearly here, they began to manipulate intimidate. well firstly, on what day it would be said. it was a holy feast in a holy place. that is, it was clearly a message such a step forward, in short, why don't you confuse? here vadim, here is your opinion, what does not suit them. i'll explain now. well, i want to finish my thought. that is, e, it was a step forward step forward, and er, you see, we are a

family, we are the family of the president, so the head of the family, and we want to see members of our family, even those who stumbled. after all, we forgive our children somewhere, instruct them somewhere, maybe be punished, but nevertheless, these are our children, therefore, in general, belarus demonstrates that we, as a family, are ready with those who do not take the path of betrayal to live together, why do they do this? uh, well, they want to hit us differently. it's coming, a hybrid war. and there are different elements of hybrid warfare. this informational economic undermining of the demographic situation. maybe it's even easier, maybe for them, for these runaway offices. it's just a fodder base and how in general, and today i'll be keeping an office with one purpose, so that svetlana in the x-hour could call on foreign military contingents to enter the territory of belarus or seal off foreign intervention more. she is no longer needed there. and what and what leaves her pasta. it still definitively humiliates her position there, but you

look today. and they have two agendas. the first call to bomb. actually, earlier. they both called for sanctions and for exerting economic pressure on siwa for an hour in almost every speech, one or another opposition representatives who are abroad discussing issues. how to inflict military damage to belarusian cities, if what we have to pay reparations they are discussing. why are financial resources distributed in the wrong way? that is, they share the money. all. well, here it is clear that if there is such a return, this is another defeat for the party team. well, let's just say there is no tikhanovskaya team there. so, uh, this office is another defeat, because they represent some kind of even inflated mass character this belarusian emigration. they say that they represent them. yes, they are now solving them and some problems, and when people are already turning away from them. this is another defeat, the next moment, but still, let's take into account the mood of our patriotic

public. the president hears. they say there was a declaration of omniscience, time passed. now a new statement. why? because our citizens are those who defended belarus in the twentieth year, and then ask the right questions, well, they will return. they will return there from sitting. there is someone for a day, someone no, the public is sitting . somehow they will not show themselves, and whether this will create some sleeping cells, how sincere this repentance will be, this discussion is ongoing in patriotic circles, and we ignore it. we can’t, such a danger also exists, because here are the pros and show they moved to turkey . we also know cases when examples were analyzed, we first went to georgia and lived. events began in ukraine there, the owner comes, they kick him out of work, they kick him out of the apartment. they say, come back to belarus , complete what you did not do in the twentieth year, where we have guarantees that these people will not continue this activity when they return, and our citizens ask these questions, so this decision is

not in vain the president. he handles this narrative. this is very correct, but it offers a certain public discussion, because there are different points of view. and here the deputies must also have their say, because there must be a balance of national security and national reconciliation. lenin you uh, understand one thing is right, you cannot declare them and the deputies that we are not those who left, we will not let them into the country. we have a criminal administrative and other code. i committed an offense literate people, we are not alone. uh, we don’t hide the norm of a creative legislative act, and he knows under which article it passes, and he knows that there is the concept of active repentance, cooperation with the investigation, assistance if he did not commit an offense, and it was some kind of economic migration, or migration, associated with certain fears, which were caused by the speculations of his relatives acquaintances there . this is one question. and

if he committed a crime in any case, questions, because it is still possible, the social basis for a new attempt at rebellion. no, special services should work for this. we cannot at the state level declare here at the state level. we do not have the right to return, no one says so to those who committed the crime, on the contrary, they say, come back. okay, soup was invited. see what an interesting topic, in fact, it turns out. we now see that these transitional offices, they are now in every possible way, uh, will prevent these people from returning. firstly, they discredit the processes with this, everything is clear, but they publish books about the protests in the twentieth year, where there are a lot of faces of those people who went to the protests in the photographs, for which, in order to create tension, that is, in parallel we see , how these polkinovskys die there, supposedly there, uh, puffed up, there, i can’t do kalinovsky’s regiments and the sohatchik well here,

probably azarov to make up for these losses, then it will begin now, uh, recruiting factors, yes, and at the expense of whom will they replenish the shelves, for sure, if people in poland lithuania who are now in an extremely difficult situation and can create conditions for them when the only way to survive anything to get into such a shooting. at the moment, pay attention. recently, our territory was detained. a citizen of georgia who clearly says that i wanted to come to ukraine in order to improve my financial situation and pay off. i'm pretty sure it's the same there are people among our people who have left, who have nowhere to go, they are put before the fact, either you go to fight, or you go to no one knows where, or you have no future . there is no one at all, we will give it up. now. after all, we have been working for the last 2 years, and now the parliamentarians, together with state bodies, have been very actively working on, strengthening our legal space for

adoption. er new laws and er, let's say updating those laws that already, let's say, required updating, so we must and er, this topic that we are now we are discussing a rather sensitive one, because human courts are also affected here and see how alexander bitterness, uh, on holy day suggested. uh, but also very uh, so ambiguous from the point of view that we have laws in place. eh, it's necessary. yes, no one will, yes, and i wanted to just indicate this message that we now have a law. we must all live according to the laws. therefore, if you have entered the law, then you must, of course, answer for this, but this is the measure of responsibility. it is also determined by law, so there should not be any speculations on human destinies. here it is necessary to act within the framework of the

laws literally. naturally. we understand that there may be willows, as citizens of their abandonment, even here for a specific purpose, but we even opened it without you. we have no visas, and uh, even for these citizens who are not citizens. belarus foreign citizens. our services make sure that no one comes there. people therefore, well this work is hard work. you are not in vain here there schwab we have drawn. there is another interesting topic. another topic on which well, it is necessary, probably, to pay attention , the dovodsky forum has opened. but before talking about this next coven of globalists. i suggest you look at the talking video, which, in general, is not about beauty, but definitely about the global appetite and the miss universe contest. well, first of all, i was surprised that it was not ukraine that won, the united states, but here look american. here is the feeling that the clan came up with her outfit, and here is such a gait of a tin woodcutter. she now brings out the image of america

armed with teeth. it is the most important thing. you see, there are ambitions on your things, there is the whole planet earth well, in general, no one smells anything of beauty here, the girl, for sure, is pretty to her . fucking for the united states shopping which one goes it's a beautiful life the girl leaves, yes, and then tries to portray, uh, democracy in all likelihood. as i understand it, it was somewhere in my thoughts that it was ideological- ideological hmm, so to speak. uh, futuristic futurological thoughts those who are came up with, you understand, the time when america carried the globe on her shoulders ended, yes, and today this is a grotesque, a certain grotesque

that is shown to the whole world, but, pay attention, this competition looks at and evaluates those messages that this girl carries on her fragile shoulders . notice, that is, she won this contest. this is a competition that is simply a show and the winners can be anyone. in this case, it is the person who today, yes, the person who and that country, which is trying to remain the world hegemot. i usually won, which is unusually most often american, i literally want to bring one more phrase, you know, and again i want to return. this grotesque is a certain demonstration of one's capabilities and how one would like to see the further development of the world situation. it's so

easy to offer you to speak shvamba when there was such a pretty girl, but in general the forum is also demonstrative. yes, well, most importantly, yes. they say that the most important thing is that an unprecedented number is there businessmen this time arrived, but from e world leaders. well, sholtsev, although it’s already a stretch to call him a world leader , there was no biden, there was no russia and china, but they still bent their line, they talked about a fragmented world, a fragmented world. and about how you need to maneuver in this world. hmm , it’s worth looking at these speeds in general today. the summer has contributed a lot in order for the world to be fragmented, these are the scenarios that were discussed there. uh, tallinn, the strategy that she developed and led to the global crisis, which we see on the one hand the desire to bring the problems of american leadership, because it is called under the rug. they have been brewing for a long time to

listen if the entire world economic crisis. as a matter of fact, it started in the united states of america already 15 years ago. they tried, uh, to transfer this burden to other countries when they were avoiding their problems, and pushing others to the forefront, but who now remembers the environmental agenda, and how many copies were broken at this dauskomforum, when philosophers, sociologists, obviously wrote about this in parallel, in including other problems were brewing in the west, and the dovodsky forum is also like that, grotesque. you didn’t get bogged down in vain. this is the show and the forum is the same show. it's the same show when this forum is on the same. uh, like cement legs trying to pull something out, and no longer intellectually or strategically, he is simply not capable of it, if you look before. yes, these are businessmen. they come to dovodsky. forum sought to get. now he, too, is turning into a symbol. this is the

passing world that destroys the good, so we will definitely continue this conversation is an answer that comes already from another part of the world, which is home to a much larger population as well. minister of india on fashion render quoting developing countries of the global south of asia africa latin america will become the driving force of the economy in the 21st century. unlike developed countries, whose growth has slowed down, the voice of the global south must set its own tone together. we must break out of the vicious circle of dependency on systems and circumstances not created by us. and then another quote from sitting, china is ready move towards rapprochement with russia for the sake of fairer global governance. that's the point. by the way, speaking from india , there were a sufficient number of billionaires, in my opinion, sixteen. so they can afford to take part there too. yes? well , let's do it, uh, we must admit today that the americans

managed to take a certain step in order to keep their hegemony for some more period. yes, he provoked here in europe quite serious regional conflict and drawing in more and more. the european union, but in order to destroy its economy with its own sanctions imposed by the european union, to bring production to north america, therefore, for some period, they will still maintain their hegemony, thanks to this, including acting, according to the principle, divide and conquer. taking advantage of the fact that china is very much tied to the market, and the united states of america taking advantage of the fact that the united states is the first in the world in oil and a number of other aspects. but this does not mean that other countries will sit, so to speak, and look at this one. as you say, performance or grotesque is natural. china, realizing that it is tied up, nevertheless understands that it is playing its own role in the world economy, being. uh, the second economy in the world to determine , uh, its own development strategy,

including using what the region is today. here in asia, the eurasian region is gaining such power, and i think that there is indeed a rapprochement between the russian federation and the ranks of other states, uh can, uh, create, uh, a precedent for, uh, say, a bipolar or multipolar world. this work will be very serious and will be opposed to this work. uh, serious work. not even a collective one, i would say of the west, but of latent transnational groups that are today engaged in changing the civilizational development of our planet. the main question for us now is how we can get into this all for centuries, there were already such historical moments when it meant the crusades, that is changed violently a changed into socio-political formations. now all of these things are happening the same way. as they say, many people think conspiracy theories or conspiracy theories

no matter what we say, but there are latent ones for transnational groups that have certain interests. and in this regard will change financially financially. the economic system is a system of payments, and the growth of the world's population and the decrease in the population of the planet control over the distribution of resources and so on, what is less and less popular with guys like india and china although it cannot be said that they are not built into the global system. that is why they are not interested in strong emotional states, because, as it were, how can we integrate into this new architecture that is now being formed by sergeyevich well , firstly, we often talk now about the formation of the creation of new centers of power. i think these are the quotes. yes, and xingping fashion shows that not only new centers of power are being formed, but new centers of development. and the republic of belarus uh, thanks to the strategic thinking of the head of state

already in some of these development centers. she 's built in. i mean, of course, first of all, he is in our strategic cooperation with china people's republic of india, we are from india, we are developing our relations very progressively, that is, more than 20 years ago, alexander grigoryevich lukashenko said very clearly about the prospects for china and he, as always, turned out to be right, and uh, today it is one of the most priority prospective and strategic partners. republic of belarus and, of course, we are strengthening our alliance with the russian federation in all difficulties. yes, under all, uh, circumstances of this conflict. uh, with ukraine it 's still the biggest power in the world. this is one of the richest countries in the world and the republic of belarus e. now it is very actively developing

economic integration with the russian federation, which will also ensure the pace of socio-economic development now and in the future. you see about our country and the level of well-being of our people, therefore, just in my opinion , the leadership of our country has taken many years ago very correct strategic decisions. and we are already built into these centers, new centers of development. remember let yourself know that this is our year of peace and creation. this is not only a message inside the state. she is still some kind of signal for the alphabet. morse there is a lighthouse that these are our values, who are with us we are ready to integrate into this new world that shares these basic concepts. you can also take it unconditionally. i agree here that the uniqueness of the belarusian situation lies in the fact that we made our choice given a long time ago and outlined these parameters and the fact that russia and then china are our strategic partners. but

this is interaction with different countries. and we don't need to change anything. we just want our position to be heard and continued. not all of the last twenty- odd years there, belarus has made peacekeeping statements. let's just remember, because it's not just a year of creation measures out of nowhere. and the fact that we ourselves have withdrawn nuclear weapons on our territory alexander lukashenko came up with the initiative to create a nuclear-free zone in the central-eastern we offered europe a platform for negotiating the minsk agreements, and at that time they were all positively assessed. they, as now retroactively trying to bring the shadow to weaving, then stopped the full-scale war further. we proposed launching a security settlement process. e in europe through the so-called helsinki two mechanism. now , if all this had been heard and carried out , there would simply have been no conflict in ukraine that we are observing, and certainly. uh, the call to alexander lukashenko is addressed and

outside, belarus thus confirms its role. well, we forgot a little. this is the term sounds. well, nevertheless, the donor of the world and a hundred. style we do not change our values, we say, yes, we belong to the east slavic civilization and ukraine belongs to the fact that they tried to wrest it out. this is also one of the reasons for the conflict. we want to develop relations with all countries, but we see that no one will replace our fraternal russia. we disconnected the significance of china in time, the ladies are somewhat incredulous about the position of the united states because they are trying to impose we open our hegemony to cooperation with the european union and with every european country, but a sovereign independent, and not one that is under an overseas protectorate. this has been our position for many years. and how have you not spoken yet? i would continue with vladimir fonovich. and if the first part of the world is already going to say enough. as for creation, just today, probably,

ero creation is coming, and it fully concerns our state. over the past 3 years, 3 years, take, when the pandemic began and when hostilities began on the territory of ukraine we really showed the whole world that a small state is capable of defending its national interests. this is the first thing we did the second moment. we have shown our ability to be. e, so to speak, e is the sequence of its e position. again, we don't change it. we have chosen our course. we go, according to this course. third. we have shown our readiness to support the allies. remember the twenty-second year and the events in kazakhstan, the events that we did and showed it and most importantly, we showed what we can create. samples of equipment innovative industrial industrial, so to

speak, all kinds of objects. we are capable of creating software. we are able to create new ideas. and it is precisely this development and creation that is included in our current strategy. well, perhaps the culmination of all this. i would say that today belarus acts as a certain spiritual center, a center of gravity, including, uh, orthodoxy in conjunction with russia, of course, but it is our deep values, they are acceptable for not only for our so let's say, the orthodox world. they are acceptable to the world. they are accepted by other countries. and possibly in the future. this is the bond that will allow you to create a new world order personally absolutely. the point in this conversation mode is so ellipsis because this topic is still fortunately or, unfortunately, we

will be dealing with a new one again. thank you for participating in this program for your opinion, which is all for today. briefly about the main thing by this hour, a busy weekend for biathlon lovers, two ubiches at once learn the results of the women's race from the scene .