do not miss the new releases of the propaganda project on belarus 24 tv channel. their entrepreneurial energy can only be envied by the people, such a proverb, old age is not age. it 's fun people retire, who's still at work? and who does the gardening? here we will build two museums there, one of them is what people did in rural areas, we want to make such a covered area, what men did in rural areas. they found peace and harmony far from the bustle of the city and extremely happy about it. well, probably this is my second homeland in this, because i am laying here. uh, the very soul of their money trying to live and expand and look and children.

my grandchildren are drawn here. i love my village very much. i love it very much. i am proud of this village. every year it becomes more and more beautiful, more and more beautiful about how modern polishchuks live, see in the project of the same name on the tv channel belarus 24. significant sporting events in the context of the whole world were very worthy of our girls 4.10.12 place the level of competition in russia you know to date, which is why we hope that these are promising guys. they will in the future show the result of the key news and sports facts of belarus as the flagship of the belarusian football. and this, despite a significant

renewal of the composition and a change in the coaching bridge of a new generation of belarusian athletes. today we can pay more attention to our hockey, so today we attract more children. yes, 40 places are being vacated somewhere for young guys. there is an opportunity to take young guys out of them to make stars. watch on tv channel belarus 24. how long have you held a book in your hands? they turned page after page greedily, tasting every word of all manifestations of human creativity, the most amazing worthy attention, these books in books live at home, the

voices of people of the past are clearly heard, everything that mankind has done has been preserved, as if by magic on the pages of books survives centuries. reading brings generations closer. we appreciate the past for our present belarus 24 hello greetings to all who are with us now, we are very glad to see the guests of our program. how we see that some of our experts will join in the conversation today.

we are looking forward to vadim hygiene, there are many topics that we want to discuss and understand, these are the vectors along which our region and our entire global space are developing today, but let's start. that's what the ukrainian regime is here for. suddenly i decided to roll out personal sanctions against our colleagues. this is alexander shpakovsky, this is grigory azarenok. our says tour. this is the general director of stv alexander rosenko. vadim pity or rejoice congratulatory we already to this. and we understand that, as a rule, more precisely, they always mark the most worthy with sanctions. these are worthy people who serve the fatherland, who did not cave in in the twentieth, who previously showed themselves with dignity and we will not succumb to sanctions pressure, but will demonstrate confidence that we are acting in accordance with the national

interests of our own country and are capable, despite sanctions, to develop and to respond to these sanctions with dignity, well, indeed, our colleagues are ironic on this score, this is at least. yes, and there someone can have more attach a strong word. i think from this list you understand who ah. well, here we go again. here is a similar topic. uh, for the sake of freshness, they called for severing relations with belarus sounds loud, but then we read who exactly and we see that the deputy of the verkhovna rada alexei goncharenko is famous. well, freak, to put it mildly, so to speak, and the verkhovna rada in the politics of ukraine announced the creation of a petition calling for times. to break off diplomatic relations with minsk, sergey anatolyevich, take it seriously, well , firstly, this is not the first attempt, not the first statement and uh, of course, uh. members are happy individual members are happy, they always strive to, uh, pr and i think that this is hmm if it

can be called an event, it should be attributed precisely to the category of personal pr nothing more, uh extraordinary plenipotentiary, the village of ukraine continues to work in minsk uh, official statements is not done. that is, it is absolutely uh, one or two days. uh, you understand the news, everyone agrees with it, so we just throw it aside, then we send such news and such politicians to the trash, but this is already the case. not we. this is already being done. herself story much more disturbing things much more disturbing messages are coming hmm western. what is called the flanks, and in the dutch port flissing oil is transferred by american other equipment tanks abrams infantry fighting vehicles bradley and self-propelled howitzers paladin approximately 1.250 units from the netherlands. the equipment goes to lithuania and poland to strengthen the eastern flank. nato technology. it’s not just offensive with high cross-country ability, which is clearly not for the defense of europe, plus

duda’s decision to transfer a company of leopard-2 tanks to kiev as part of an international coalition plus a macron with amx wheeled tanks and the british with challenge tanks. but nikolai evgenievich these people will point the finger at the regional grouping, saying that their teachings threaten regional security. you see, you have already given your thoughts a clear understanding of what is happening. uh, i'm used to, uh, operate with numbers and talk about specific events about specific events, if the previous moment when the breakup of relations was a fake, you can call it differently , that is, there is a reality of thousands pieces of equipment came to the adjacent territory. they are moving towards our borders. uh, but all this must be considered. in general, in the context of the purchase, the planned purchase of poland is thousands of units of tanks for

example. at the moment, france has 406 objects in its composition, only germany 220 great britain 227 and germany 248. these are the numbers that are in europe today, the reality of modern more or less technology. i plan to talk about 1,000 tanks. the question is why and who needs them, definitely not in order to put them near our borders and drinking coffee here in neighboring poland, lithuania or estonia is definitely an attacking means. and most importantly - these are modern means. and for some reason, we are talking only about armored vehicles, artillery means have been added to this equipment, patriots are already against air defense. they say, everyone who can only, uh, anti-tank weapons and all kinds of kits of everything that is possible. this is a forecast, but in my opinion,

aviation will come to a stop only in one, in order to use aviation, long-term training of pilots is necessary. and if we talk about saturation of ukrainians, after all, yes, they have digested such a volume of equipment, which, in general, is of the last class, what is called this, what you need to learn, you need to be able to use it. uh, that means it’s just scrap metal, as in ukraine today we are talking not only about ukraine; today we are talking about a united west, including experts from military specialists , western states that, under the guise of mercenaries, are ready to fight in ukraine and, in my opinion, for the whole this technique will be found crews and the necessary specialists. and most it is probably terrible that practically any features are transferred in an escalating situation; we are talking not only about defense. as they said today, we are no longer talking about some. means of some kind of anti-tank is not a means

of protection there is a real question about the means of attack by any means to develop russia on the battlefield. that is, once again for the infantry video. yes, too, once again for the most naive. yes, that is, not russia, ukraine are fighting, but in reality this is a war between the west and russia, if anyone does not understand it, until now, it has not been enough for themselves . there is also. yes, it's amazing that the united west, through the hands of ukraine, is trying to weaken russia while destroying belarus as an ally of the russian federation that the republic of belarus has never threatened. we always say that this is a regional grouping of forces, united with russia in order to deter in the event of aggression, therefore we are developing this grouping, according to plan. e. you know that in 2021

, uh, vgs, approved the updated military doctrine of the union state, which we will now say, so even the head of state said that it is even becoming outdated, because events are developing very dynamically and, uh, we, uh, respond to those possible threats that are uh formed by such actions. uh, west well, look. and why did he ask specifically about the ukrainians in terms of the supply of weapons, because we are seeing that more and more generals, including those who are retired abroad, say that there are at least two factors. why they don’t transfer equipment very well, for example, to ukraine for example, a retired air vice marshal of the british royal air force, that he was saying the first destruction of equipment on the territory of ukraine is a blow to the reputation of manufacturers, how then to sell these weapons to say that they are the best, and the second point is that ukrainians will have to undergo lengthy training to use these machines. and i’ll add a third point, which for some reason i

didn’t say again that it was about what the uk does not have. uh, normal serious ground forces and any transmission, so to speak. to whomever there were means of destruction, including tanks. this is a blow to their own armed forces, which are very difficult for them to replenish. welcome to our program. well, we are now talking about the fact that the transfer of colossal forces, which were previously concentrated. mostly in ukraine now in the immediate vicinity of our borders. here is your prediction. this is a provocation in order to escalate tension or is still preparing to strike in the near future. i think that poland is not ready for war and is not going to fight anymore, if we are talking about some kind of political action. they need to be seen in context upcoming election campaign. well, in addition, you need to understand that nato e is not ready for a big war with the russian federation, respectively, an allied state, all this talk that in

ukraine russia is directly at war with nato in ukraine, russia is still with the ukrainians with the ukrainian armed forces. but it’s just that nato supplies them in ukraine with a non-deployed division of a full-fledged brigade. yes, we see large deliveries of weapons. they are hundreds of units, this is a fairly high-quality weapon, it seriously affects the course of combat actions, and naturally there is a military-political maneuvering in the region and from poland from the baltic countries, but so far the main strategy. the west is to inflict a military defeat on the territory of ukraine to the russian federation. and the transfer of hostilities to the territory of belarus in the near future. well , no one like me, as we see, and they do not plan for analysis. it is possible only as an armed provocation. in the event that russia conducts a new major offensive operation there, or let’s say from the ukrainian side in order to it’s possible to stretch the front, well, a couple of nuances, firstly, and you shouldn’t discount

that poland is so reinforced today, but in military-technical terms, and has good infrastructure for additional overload of troops, which is a potential threat, nevertheless, there is emanates from poland and in the near future will be able to carry out more independently, and local range operations, so they are ready to have the opportunity to question that, naturally, we expect that, taking into account its the possibilities of the union state and other threats that, uh, potential may be from the side of the union state, including nuclear umbrella, they are not resolved regarding ukraine. ukraine was initially supervised by, uh, western experts, including the military. there were a lot of advisers there who were introduced to the highest officers of the ukrainian army; there is a question, if zelensky’s guards have their own people, in addition to the cia and others, so understand that today the west is collective, using, a first of all, the manpower of ukraine a dropping

old equipment is at war with the russian federation , but at the same time, because this is a matter of existential threat. they will amplify to the maximum degree. uh, apu with the aim of inflicting defeat on the russian federation and under the guise of pmcs of private licensed mercenary structures. the regular officers of the nato troops can easily participate in this operation, but still i would note that poland is currently not ready to conduct any large-scale operations on its own and will not be ready for the next 2-3 years. we see this in the planning of the polish armed forces, therefore, as for the junk that they dump there, find out such junk, 232, at least, and the howitzers that the americans put, they are 155 mm, the old 105 mm last year for a million shells, but this is not quite such a story. i mean, here are two interesting sent. and there are two interesting messages in the development of the topic. here is one side. ukraine has planned the foreign ministry of the world itself.

the headquarters is there, on february 24, he promises that a plan for a peaceful settlement will be presented, of course, as you will see kiev, but on the other hand at the same time general secretary nato stoltenberg makes the same statement normalization of relations with western countries with russia will not come even after the end of the conflict in ukraine here is how to understand this, it means that russia simply has no other chance with them, except for these to the end hmm let's start with the reality, uh , the script has already been written, it is already written, it is anticipated in life and in this script. the main character from the point of view of the warring country so far is ukraine and its forces in any way. how to fight, let's say the ukrainians, but stoltenberg expresses a shared interest. or let's say the position of the west, and it clearly says that until we achieve our own goals set in ukraine, we will not stop. the main objective. what weakening of russia's expansion of russia is gone. well, that's a long way

off. dismemberment destruction, according to the documents, and the initial uh two to the twentieth year, the strengthening of russia in the region and the contraction. it becomes a centripetal force takes into account its influence in the cis countries 20 year 22 they planned the separation of ukraine, including the option there was a military conflict, the year 24 is designated as the year of russia's one scenario. but this is the scenario that is written. let's talk then about reality, and reality. this is the nato strategy that was adopted literally last year, where it is written what they want, and it clearly says that the main adversary is russia is the main one. uh, so to speak, and the second china well, not an enemy, but the main strategic competitor. let's proceed from this, as a rule, nato acts according to its documents. and it does justice to the plays. it for a long time we have already talked about this more than once,

to which i am quoting. environmentally friendly, join the conversation to the fact that the world is frozen in such an expectation that there, in april, in august, once this peace talks take place. they finally say, well, we hear in parallel from those who constantly push the back of the ukrainians that even if peace happens, we will still continue. here is the confrontation. after all , today in ukraine it is being played out. uh, the element of redistribution of the world about it. it is clear to all analysts. e specialist, anyone and until it is resolved. the main task will not stop. well, what is happening here, and not one of the parties in the twenty-second year has not reached its strategic goals. objectives accordingly in order to move towards political regulation. they must demonstrate strength and inflict some kind of visible and presented to the world community a major military defeat, so that from a position of strength they impose on the other side one or another

negotiation about final goals. the west is there or the collapse of russia, the relaxation of russia it seems to me that they still do not need to exaggerate their. uh, some kind of such a malicious one that they don’t sit even 10 years ahead. there, maybe someone thinks so, but those who make the decision they are to a large extent. you have come across, yes, adjusting to the situation, of course, they do not want to defeat russia if this will lead to the collapse of russia. they are even further, and not how they analyze. and how to manage these disintegrated. yes, they face so many new tasks of answering that they don’t know, here are nuclear weapons and interethnic conflicts and so on, but most importantly, they already consider. so i want it so that we see it is written that 22 years old, as they think. it has become the year of russia's political defeat, and then they are already gradually moving towards the next goal, china, and now they are thinking about how to integrate russia into these new plans of theirs. in what form, therefore, it is not in vain that statements are made that

european architecture, security, and so on and so forth are impossible without russia. these two tracks are classic american police pressure, that is, a whip and some kind of diplomatic traps. i want to point out the first one. e, unfortunately, i state the fact that the us has already provoked this special military provocation in europe, they have already achieved their goals, they have defined geopolitical weakened russia, weakened its influence in the central asian region e. there are quite strong forces in the middle east. i will finish. i mean, i left russia quite strongly here in the region. first second. uh, the fact that the military operation will end sooner or later. naturally. we count on it. we count on the victory of the russian federation but they are not going to stop on the issue of economic containment of sanctions policies, but they are trying to strengthen them. uh, the backlog of russia in terms of dark technology. at the same time, the americans will also play on contradictions. it's the perfect

scenario for them. still, the expansion of the escalation of this conflict, and we must prevent this, therefore, they not only want to limit themselves to ukraine and not only to us completing this military operation in the foreseeable future, but up to drawing poland and a number of others into this conflict absolutely right and about the threats that concern us and about the exodus of the company in ukraine, what will be reflected in it is quite obvious, but this confirms that the new word the head of the estonian foreign ministry ursa flew at the webinar recently, and the strategies of democratic forces, belarus the head of the estonian foreign ministry we it is very important how the democratic forces in belarus will live, he said that he connects the democratization of belarus with the outcome of the war in ukraine, so everything, like everything that is unfolding on the territory of ukraine, concerns us directly, if we if we proceed from the most favorable scenario for us, then we will not accept in advance the need to eat from a favorable scenario, but we must see the obvious things, that is, it is

impossible, uh, and our analysis to draw along the line of such a constant escalation. first, the west is afraid of a direct clash with the russian federation, our security officials spoke about this. we remember the briefing and the chairman of the state security committee and our military why because they were carried out in the west, modeling russian strategic e, forces, they are in good condition. we see the poseidon torpedo arrived and in case there really is a threat to the russian federation a. either the direct involvement of nato troops russia is ready to use all the forces of deterrence that they have, they understand this very well, they are afraid of a direct collision. they understand that the invasion of the territory of the republic of belarus by force. nato, this will mean, according to our military doctrine, an invasion of the territory of an allied state. and by their actions. they are very afraid. that's when the rockets flew in and some statements, when the pranksters

called and so on. that is, the west manages risks, first of all, the risks of nuclear war. we see nuclear war. they do not want to. yes , respectively, they are trying to defeat the existing economic yes diplomatic military forces, but why did the west not achieve the goal, speaking about belarus from a topic that pops up the gap in relations between belarus and russia, the destruction of the integration community, the destruction of our military union was and is one of the strategic civilizations of the west and she doesn't just didn't reach it. that, but as a result of a special military operation, they will see that we have become even more employees. what is the best way to test your erudition and ingenuity correctly tricky questions to start at what age he as it seems to you, he could already be called a grandfather. i think that from 65. i probably just

exhaled right now, and bogdan thinks so, but i read the new earth in a summary and, in my opinion, a variant appeared there. b. if this is a wrong answer, grow up, please, otherwise i will be a belarusian teacher watch the most. programs it is absolutely true that his army of subscribers is already almost 500 million. who invented the detective? i understand hercule poirot, thank you. i know nikita so what is the word winter is cold, watch intellectually entertaining projects on our tv channel. expedition

for good fruits i want to say that well, it is no coincidence that this idea is such a loud statement by

the world itself. come on, how can it be carried out without the participation of the russian federation of the people 's republic of china and where uh hmm on the other hand. uh, of course we know the price too. some e-e agreements international agreements including the minsk agreements. uh, here are the statements of merkel landa, which, by the way, played very much in favor of, probably, the russian federation and. well, in some psychological and ideological terms, in support of even the air force, and we see the price of these agreements with whom to negotiate today? therefore, of course, e task. e is worth it. uh, this is causing some damage to the russian federation, uh, of course, you know, and

the resolutions of the us congress of the european parliament have been repeatedly adopted. uh, where it is written in plain text that the west does not arrange a union state, therefore, of course, uh, an attempt at a rebellion. uh, 2020 was not a success, we survived and now the task, of course, uh, is to continue to continue strengthening the belarusian state. in continuation of a very interesting sociology came from the european union. almost half of the inhabitants of the eu countries 48% are in favor of the war in ukraine to end as soon as possible , and these polls, which were conducted in nine countries, and without saying. and serbia would have had more numbers more indicative is the most speedy end of hostilities, and even at the cost of ukraine's territorial losses, although there are more than 60% austrians and germans, and about the

same sentiments among the greeks among the italians among the spaniards. that is, people get tired of this very simply, these countries, as the most prosperous for many years, felt most of all that life can become worse, and they felt it not only because prices increased, household expenses increased, it became harder to live, but europe used to live well for decades at the expense of the price of gas on other means. so let's say, for cheap energy and so on, it is these people, when i always see all decisions go through you personally, if your life has become worse. so he must find a reason why to get out of this situation. the reason is that with the help of ukraine, the war in ukraine and all the powerful here about ukrainian propaganda in the european union, still the vast majority. why with you in

order to show that the impulses that russia gave readiness for negotiations, they misrepresent and distort in their own information space , and they will pass off this summit as if ukraine was ready on those terms. they put forward some conditions for peace there 10 points. they present them as the only possible ones. the only fair, but it is obvious that when one side absolutely does not want to listen to the position of the other and the realities that are already in place to come to some kind of agreements, you can’t understand, they say, and here i didn’t want to say all this happening. and involuntarily thought about it. yes, and look, there is zelensky who does not want any negotiations at all about this many times already said here in there is another figure of a person who, well, i’ll call it beautiful of course, it’s not enough beautiful, but it went into some kind of parallel, and before that, say the trajectory, that having said that he is not opposed to participating in the presidential race in parallel, medvedchuk has

some kind of article of his own there. she is famous in the platform. maybe this is prepared too. well, this is still a different situation, with regard to ristovich, and there is no need to pump up and overestimate this figure of arrestovich - this is a political adventurer and his entire biography. it develops this way, he has situational support, based on the fact that he is one of the most popular bloggers. but about his adventurism, he says that he is some kind of office adviser, as if at work, he is not a member of the application wrote there they say that he seems to be, as if he had nothing to write, does not receive retribution. that is, this is a typical politically do not give. well , you know, who is behind him, behind him are standing some large groups, as for medvedchuk. uh, ukrainian propaganda and the current government succeeded. suppose we create an image of such a pro-russian leader, he was deprived of his citizenship altogether. that is, the fact that on the territory of the russian federation there will be a consolidation of forces opposing zelensky. it's true. and this is a serious force that cannot be underestimated, because if you

look at the statistics. how many left ukraine and how many left, including for the territory of the russian federation, to us, then this hundreds of thousands of people on the territory of ukraine itself still remain hundreds of thousands, and maybe millions of people who share these pro-russian sentiments, medvedchuk can count on this audience, well, understandable in the current situation. this is a political figure, significant only in the territory that is not controlled by the regime. eh, zelensky and in terms of a peaceful settlement, again. let's get straight to the new major armed confrontation. whether it is a head-on battle, or an offensive operation by one of the parties, but say something serious. peaceful steps, but it is hardly necessary to throw weapons there for the wrong reason. that's the continuation. well, you know, i didn't feel like talking, but still. in my opinion. again, returning to the thought of the price agreement. yes, this is more, probably, it will still be a cover. e new

arms supplies. e strengthening the armed component of the armed forces. yes, yes, to viewers, it’s understandable when everyone asks a question, when there will be negotiations, negotiations, perhaps in the next case, when one of the parties is so ass that she cannot, a act to punish the resistance not only militarily, but also economically and forced to go ashore. that is, you need to agree to the terms and conditions for this to work correctly. vadim frenchevich. he said that there should be one more round, but, unfortunately, and maybe not one, unfortunately, we, most likely, will not be limited to one round of me. second, if one of the parties can either convince or force the beneficiary to back down, right? and this is the united states, if the russian federation is a monk, this is effective, well the russian federation can be in the union with its e-partners according to the international dialogue, it could force other steps, the united anglo-saxons to abandon this project of destabilizing europe but it is even

more difficult, because they have invested money in it. and this is long-term planning until either one side is weakened, or the beneficiary is not interested in escalating. this conflict will continue colleagues another big one. let's get closer to us . yes, that's right absolutely right we have outlined, but on the context, but sort out a very important issue from afar and start ah. here we are saying, look at this question of ordinary europeans. we see what they want, of course, as usual people. they want peace, they want the usual quiet life, but at the same time, with this one, we see that politicians are in the west. they are clearly using azurin tablets. uh, our nearest western neighbors are also poland and lithuania, because otherwise, how do they behave with migrants, throwing them, uh, into our territory through this fence, often already dead on january 12, the last case, when three corpses are on the border between belarus and poland in parallel. we see that the european court of human rights allowed poland

to send illegal migrants back to belarus. we conclude that further, most likely, they will give a license to shoot these people. why not? wouldn't it be illogical to continue and move on that's right, and no one because of this bear the rollover. yes, we remember the words of the barrel, and in the marvelous garden and jungle, we understand that, probably, we need to understand what is in the eyes the west is not only africans, they are only separately afghans, well, russians, belarusians, ukrainians - this is also the jungle and here smoothly. i come to the question that, in general, alexander lukashenko proposed to the whole society during christmas, when he spoke in the church and said, maybe now is the time to take a step forward. for those, at least, who realized who left, just on a wave of emotions, or who is ready to suffer? it seems to me that these two themes are linked gracefully. why were you going? i want to say that this the question, either they are already trying to answer,

or the connection of the thief, they will start to eat directly, since we see the signals. what are these? uh, a certain number of our citizens to leave, right? let's look at it objectively as well. they settled there. no, look at what criticism is coming, but these runaway structures that all sorts of things have been created there, there are offices, some kind of cabinets , any interview that is going on from their side is just a flurry of negative comments why, but many people know, firstly , someone went, the future on the wave of such a political euphoria, a year has already passed, the second nothing changes. and they have these ideological euphoria gone. they call them there these, but the newly called ones, neophytes and so on. and others thought, they will go under the political wave, we will decide there economic issues, life has become worse, few people began to live better. so what is happening. we see more than one case when they go there, but to treat their teeth to buy glasses.

it means getting medical attention. come here the question arises. on what basis, if you continue to use do you have a belarusian passport with the blessings of the belarusian state? so you then decide on your position. we've made a special request here. now here is a small block to illustrate to our viewers. that is not our survey. we looked at the opposition resource on purpose, because we saw that they were also trying to screw things up. and how did people react, being in poland to lithuania, to the words of the belarusian president. they were probably disappointed, because the vast majority have either already returned or are going to return their thoughts. let's get a look. now let's listen to a certain alexander, a developer of cereals. these companies that's what he said with his wife spent 9 months in exile , there were two reasons for leaving. the first war. in ukraine , the second customer of the project did not want to cooperate with belarusian offices. we decided to relocate to turkey, then the idea came to

move to poland, but we realized that it would be financially difficult for us to live there. as a result, when you returned to belarus, there is always a risk that they can come and arrest you. but when i arrived in minsk, i even began to sleep better. my wife and i we want to live in belarus, our home is here, not our selection for those who are trying to teach us that we are rigged facts, this is a person on an opposition resource, he says to his thoughts. here's no one, as he is known, and my position is as follows. i would clearly explain that a house is a house. this is where the walls help. and this is understood by most people and the message of the president, which we all heard, we all heard, but thank god people heard from behind the cordon. come back here waiting for you. you made a mistake, but the motherland is ready to forgive you. this is the first message second message. eh, no one needs anyone anywhere, except at home, if you work here, you work,

you find your niche in public life. here you can develop and reach a certain limit and certain heights. what this young man is talking about. hope that went abroad and is engaged in go scope. many. who left. today they realized that, and it would be better for them in belarus, that life in belarus is in no way worse. let's just say the phrase is no worse than in europe and most importantly. he is here , a citizen protected by many parameters, on many issues and the state is ready. give him a guarantee. here's a couple more examples. something from their forums, something, again, and everything is solid taken from not about state resources, that means, but a couple of quotes from fifteen and twenty acquaintances of it people who are clearly satisfied with the move 3-4 the rest would like to go back, but they cannot

participate in actions , are afraid of detentions others got a new job abroad. further. i think the situation in belarus is being aggravated so that ukraine will transfer part of the troops to the north. this is how he thinks this one, and reconciliation of the war of accounting specialties was a formality, when i arrived in minsk, i even began to sleep better in batumi, we often recalled minsk, they said that our streets were wider, services, products were better, the situation with possible detention also did not frighten on the march, and they walked. in the end, we decided to return. and finally, one of my friends has returned. and for the photo in the phone he ended up for a day, and after leaving the isolation ward. he decided not to leave again. he said his time, he had already served time, firstly, they even tried to manipulate the statement president. he urged to come, but said that those who committed the crime will answer, and anyway they will speak clearly here, they began to manipulate intimidate. well , firstly, on what day it would be said. it was a holy feast in a holy place. that

is, it was clearly a message such a step forward, in short, why don't you confuse? here vadim, here is your opinion, what does not suit them. i'll explain now. well, i want to finish my thinking. i mean, uh, it was a step forward step forward, and uh, you know, we are a family, we are the president's family, so the head of the family, and we want to see our family members even those who have stumbled. after all, we forgive our children somewhere, we instruct them somewhere, maybe we punish them, but nevertheless, they are our children. therefore, in general, belarus demonstrates that we, as a family, are ready to live together with those who are not ready to embark on the path of betrayal why do they do it? uh, well, they want to hit us differently. it's coming, a hybrid war. and there are different elements of hybrid warfare. this is informational economic undermining demographic situation. maybe it's even easier, maybe for them, for these runaway offices. this is just a food base and how in general, and today i will keep the cabinet for one purpose, so that svetlana at x-hour can call on foreign military contingents to enter

the territory of belarus or to seal. uh, more foreign intervention. she is no longer needed there. and what and what leaves her pasta. it still definitively humiliates her position there, but you look today. and they have two agendas. the first call to bomb. in fact, they used to call for sanctions and, as a means of exerting economic pressure , one or another opposition representative who is abroad discusses issues in almost every speech. how to inflict military damage to belarusian cities, if what we have to pay reparations they are discussing. why are financial resources distributed in the wrong way? that is, they share the money. all. well, here e it is clear that if there is such a return, this is another defeat for the party team. well let's get straight there is no tikhanovskaya team there. so, uh, this office is another defeat, because they represent some kind of even inflated mass character of this belarusian emigration. they say that

they represent them. yes, they are now solving them and some problems, and when people are already turning away from them. this is another defeat, the next moment, but still, let's take into account the mood of our patriotic public. the president hears. they say there was a declaration of omniscience, time passed. now a new statement. why? because our citizens are those who defended belarus in the twentieth year, and then ask the right questions, well, they will return. they'll come back from sitting there. there is someone for a day, someone no, the public is sitting . somehow they will not show themselves, and whether this will create some sleeping cells, how sincere this repentance will be, this discussion is ongoing in patriotic circles, and we ignore it. we can’t, such a danger also exists, because here e pros and show they moved to turkey . we also know cases when we sorted out examples, we went first to georgia lived. events began in ukraine there, the owner comes, they are expelled from work, they are expelled from the apartment

, the renters say, come back to belarus , complete what you did not do in the twentieth year, where we have guarantees that these people will not continue this activity when they return, and these questions are asked by our citizens , therefore, such a decision and not in vain the president. he handles this narrative. this is very correct, but it offers a certain public discussion, because there are different points vision. and here the deputies must also have their say, because there must be a balance of national security and national reconciliation. lenin, you, uh, understand one thing correctly, you cannot declare them and the deputies that we are not those who left, we will not let them into the country. we have a criminal administrative and other code. i committed an offense literate people, we are not alone. uh, we don’t hide the norm of a creative legislative act, and he knows what article it goes through, and he knows that there is a concept active repentance, cooperation with the investigation, assistance, if he did not commit an

offense, and it was some kind of economic migration, or migration associated with certain fears that were caused by speculations of his relatives and acquaintances there. this is one question. and if he committed a crime in any case, questions, because it is still possible, the social basis for a new attempt at rebellion. no, special services should work for this. we cannot at the state level declare here at the state level. we you have no right to return, no one so declares those who committed the crime on the contrary. lana was invited. look, what an interesting topic, in fact, it turns out. we now see that those transitional offices, they are now in every possible way, uh, will prevent these people from returning. firstly , they discredit the processes with this, everything is clear, but they publish books about the protests in the twentieth year, where there are a lot of faces of those people who went to the protests in the photographs, for which, in order to create tension, that is, in parallel we see how these die

polkinovsky there, supposedly there, uh, puffed up, there, i can’t do well here kalinovsky’s regiments and the sohatchik, probably azarov just to make up for these losses, which means it will begin now, uh, recruiting is an important factor, yes, and due to whom they will replenish the regiments, for sure, if people in the soil of lithuania which is now in an extremely difficult situation and can create such conditions for them, when the only way to survive anything is to get into such an execution. everything will continue in the moment. pay attention. recently, our territory was detained by a citizen of georgia who clearly says that i wanted to come to ukraine to improve my financial situation and pay off. i am almost sure that there are the same people among our people who left, who have nowhere to go, they are put before the fact, either you go to war, or you go to no one knows where, or you have no future . there is no one at all. still, for the last 2

years, and now the parliamentarians, together with state bodies, have been very actively working on e, strengthening our legal space over acceptance. e of new laws and , let’s say, updating those laws that already, let’s say, required updating, so we must, and, uh, this topic that we are discussing now is quite sensitive, because human courts are also affected here and look how alexander gorech, uh, offered on a holy day. uh, but also very uh, so ambiguous in terms of what we need laws to be? yes, this is clear. yes? yes, no one will, yes, and i wanted to just indicate this message that we now have a law. we must all live according to the laws. therefore, if you have entered the law, then you must, of course

, answer for this, but this is the measure of responsibility. it is also determined by law, so there should not be any speculation on human destinies. here it is necessary to act within the framework of the laws literally. naturally. we understand that there may be a recruitment of citizens and their transfer, even here for a specific purpose, but we even opened it without you. we have no visas, and uh, even for these citizens who are not citizens. belarus, foreign citizens of our service make sure that no one comes there. people therefore, well this work is hard work. you are not in vain here there schwab we have drawn. there is another interesting topic. another topic that, well, you should probably pay attention to, was opened by the davos forum. but before talking about this next coven of globalists. i suggest you look at the talking video, which is well, in general, not about beauty, but definitely about the global appetite and the miss universe contest well, first of all, i was surprised

what won was not ukraine won, the united states but here look at the american. here is the feeling that the schwab clan came up with the outfit and here is such a gait of a tin woodcutter. she now brings out the image of america armed with teeth. it is the most important thing. see ambition. naturally , their things have the whole planet earth well, in general, no one has anything beauty. it doesn't smell here, the girl, for sure, is nice to her . there are no questions, but it was painful not to look when she, probably, is like america today . states of purchase which one goes it's a beautiful life the girl is leaving. yes they are then trying to portray uh democracy in all likelihood. as i understand it, it was somewhere in my thoughts that it was ideological- ideological hmm, so to speak. uh, futuristic

thoughts, those who came up with this understand the time when america carried the globe on its shoulders ended, yes, and today this is a certain grotesque grotesque that is shown to the whole world, but, pay attention, this competition is watched and evaluated by those, uh messages that the girl carries on her fragile shoulders. notice, that is, she won this contest. this is a competition that is simply a show and the winners can be anyone. in this case, it is the person who today is yes, the person who and the country that is trying to remain the world hegemon usually won, which is unusually most often american, i literally want

to bring one more phrase, you know, and again i want to return. this grotesque is a certain e show of their capabilities and how i would like to see the further development of the world situation, just to suggest that you speak shvababa when there was such a pretty girl, but in general, the forum is also indicative, i ask. yes, well, most importantly, yes. they say that the most important thing is that an unprecedented number of businessmen there this time came, but from uh world leaders. well, sholtsev, although it’s already a stretch to call him a world leader , there was no biden, there was no russia and china, but they still bent their line, they talked about a fragmented world, a fragmented world. and about how you need to maneuver in this world, mm, it’s worth looking at these speeds today, by the way, the forum contributed a lot to the fly in order for the world to be fragmented, these are the scenarios that were discussed there. eh, tallinn

is the strategy that was developed by her and led to the global crisis, which we see on the one hand the desire to bring the problems of e american leadership, because it is called the undercarpet. they have been brewing for a long time to listen if the entire world economic crisis. as a matter of fact, it began in the united states of america already 15 years ago. they tried, uh, to transfer this burden to other countries when they were avoiding their problems, and pushing others to the forefront, but who now remembers the environmental agenda, and how many copies were broken at this dauskomforum, when philosophers , sociologists, obviously wrote about this in parallel, in including western ones, other problems and dovozki were brewing? forum - this, too, grotesque here you are not in vain bogged down. this is the show and the forum is the same show. it's the same show when this forum is on the same. uh, like cement legs trying to pull something out, uh no longer intellectually, not strategically. he

is simply not capable of this, if you look at it before. yes, these are businessmen. they come to dovodsky. forum sought to get. now he, too, is turning into a symbol. that is the outgoing world that destroys the good, so we will definitely continue this conversation with the answer that comes from another part of the world, in which a much larger population lives, as well. minister of india on render fashion quote developing countries global south asia africa latin america will become the driving force of the economy in the 21st century. unlike developed countries, whose growth has slowed down, the voice of the global south must set its own tone together. we must break out of the vicious circle of dependency on systems and circumstances not created by us. and then another quote from sitting, china is ready to move closer to russia for the sake of more equitable global governance. that's the point. by the way, speaking from india

, there were a sufficient number of billionaires, in my opinion, sixteen. so they can afford to take part there too. yes? well let's do it, uh, we must admit today that the americans still managed to take a certain step in order to hold back their hegemony for some more period. yes, he provoked quite serious regional conflicts here in europe, drawing in more and more. the european union, but in order to destroy their economy with their own sanctions imposed by the european union, to bring production to north america, so for some period they will still have their hegemony, thanks to this they will preserve, including acting, according to the principle, divide and rule. taking advantage of the fact that china is very strongly tied to the market of the united states of america. taking advantage of the fact that the united states is the world's first in oil and oil production, and in the processing of petroleum products, and a number of other aspects. but this does not mean that other countries will sit, so to speak, and look at this one. as you say, performance or grotesque, of course. china, realizing that

it is tied up, nevertheless understands that to play its own role in the global economy, being. uh, the second economy in the world to determine , uh, its own development strategy, including using what the region is today. here in asia, the eurasian region is gaining such power, and i think that indeed the rapprochement of the russian federation the ranks of other states, uh, can, uh, create, uh, a precedent, uh, well, say, a bipolar or multipolar world. this work will be very serious and will be opposed to this work. uh, serious work. not not collective, even i would say the west, but latent transnational groups that today are engaged in changing the civilizational development of our planet, the main question for us now is how we can get into all this for centuries, there were already such historical moments when it meant the crusades,

that is, it changed violently, changed into socio-political formations. now all of this is happening the same way. as they say. many people think conspiracy theories or conspiracy theories no matter what we say, but there are latent transnational groups that have certain interests. and in this connection will change financially. the economic system is a system of payments, and the growth of the world's population and reduction, well, the population of the planet , control over the distribution of resources and so on, what is less and less popular with guys like india and china although it cannot be said that they are not built into the global system that is why they are not interested in strong emotional states, because, as it were, how can we integrate into this new architecture that is now being formed. well, firstly, we now often talk about the formation of creation of new centers of power. i think these are the quotes. yes, and the fashion of sindipin shows that

not only new centers of power are being formed, but new centers of development. and the republic of belarus , thanks to the strategic thinking of the head of state, is already in some of these development centers. she's built in. i mean, of course, first of all, he has our strategic cooperation with china, the people's republic of china, we are from india, we are developing our relations very progressively. that is, uh, more than 20 years ago, alexander grigoryevich lukashenko spoke very clearly about perspectives of china and he, as always, turned out to be right, and uh, today it is one of the most priority prospective and strategic partners. republic of belarus and, of course, we are strengthening our alliance with the russian federation despite all the difficulties. yes, under all, uh, circumstances of this conflict. uh, with ukraine it's still the

biggest power in the world. this is one of the richest countries in the world and the republic of belarus e. now it is very actively developing economic integration with the russian federation. what is also both now and in the future will ensure the pace of socio-economic development. you see about our country and the level of well-being of our people, that's why, in my opinion , the leadership of our country made very correct strategic decisions many years ago, and we are already built into these centers, new centers of development. yes, remember this concept , you gave yourself one phrase that this is our year of peace and creation. this is not only a message inside the state, but also a kind of signal for the alphabet. morse there here lighthouse here our values, who is with us we are ready to integrate into this new world that we share. these basic concepts can be

perceived unconditionally. i agree here that the uniqueness of the belarusian situation lies in the fact that we made our choice long ago and outlined these parameters and the fact that russia and then china are our strategic partner. but this is interaction with different countries. and we don't need to change anything. we just want our position to be heard throughout. not all of the last twenty -odd years there, belarus has performed with peace statements. let's just remember, because it's not just a year of measure and creation out of nowhere. and the fact that we ourselves have withdrawn nuclear weapons on our territory alexander lukashenko came up with the initiative to create a nuclear-free zone in central-eastern europe, we proposed a platform for negotiating the minsk agreements, and then they were all positively evaluated. they, as they are now retroactively trying to bring the shadow to weaving, then stopped the full-scale war further. we proposed launching a security settlement process. e in europe through the so-called helsinki two mechanism. now

, if all this had been heard and carried out , there would simply have been no conflict in ukraine that we are observing, and certainly. eh, alexander lukashenko's call is addressed, and thus belarus confirms its role outside. well, we forgot a little. this is the term sounds. well, nevertheless, the donor of the world and a hundred. style we do not change our values, we say, yes, we belong to the east slavic civilization and ukraine belongs to the fact that they tried to wrest it out. this is also one of the reasons for the conflict. we want to develop relations with all countries, but we see that no one will replace our fraternal russia. we disconnected the importance of china in time, the ladies are somewhat distrustful of the position of the united states because they are trying to impose their hegemony, we are open to cooperation with the european union and with every european country, but a sovereign independent, and not one that is under an overseas protectorate. this has been our position

for many years. and how have you not yet commented on this result by vladimir fonovich. and if the first part of the world will already be enough to say about creation, just today, probably, is coming. the era of creation and it fully concerns our state. over the past 3 years, let's take 3 years, when the pandemic began and when hostilities began on the territory of ukraine. we really showed the whole world that a small state is capable of defending its national interests. this is the first thing we did the second moment. we have shown our ability to be. e, so to speak, e is the sequence of its e position. again, we don't change it. we have chosen our well. we're going according to this course. third. we have shown our readiness to support the allies. remember the twenty-second year and the events in kazakhstan.