hmm, if this can be called an event, it should be attributed specifically to the category of personal pr, nothing more, uh, emergency plenipotentiary, the ukrainian village continues to work in minsk, uh, no official statements are made. that is, it is absolutely uh, one or two days. uh, the news all agrees on that, so we just toss it aside and then we throw in the trash such news and such politicians, but that's the point. not we. this is already doing itself, the story is much more disturbing things much more disturbing messages are coming hmm from the westerners. what is called the flanks, and in the dutch port listing is massively deployed with american military equipment tanks abrams bmp bradley and self-propelled howitzers. a paladin of about 1250 units from the netherlands in vehicles is going to lithuania and poland to strengthen the eastern flank. nato technology. not just offensive. with high cross-country ability,

which is clearly not for the protection of europe, plus duda’s decision to transfer a company of leopard-2 tanks to kiev as part of an international coalition, plus a macron with imx wheeled tanks. well, the british with tanks challenge. but nikolai evgenievich these people will point fingers to a regional grouping saying that their teachings threaten regional security. you know, you even gave your thoughts a clear understanding of what is happening. uh, i’m used to, uh, operate with numbers and talk about specific events, about specific events, if the previous moment, when the breakup of relations was a fake, you can’t call it differently, then here is the reality of thousands of pieces of equipment, we have come to the limiting territory. they are moving towards our borders. uh, but all this must be considered, in a general context. purchase planned purchase of poland thousands of units. tanks for example, at the

moment france has 406 objects in its composition, only germany 220 great britain 227 and germany 248. these are the numbers that exist in europe today, the reality of modern more or less technology. i plan to talk about 1,000 tanks. the question is why and who needs them definitely not in order to put them near our borders and drink coffee here in neighboring poland, lithuania or estonia, these are definitely attacking means. and most importantly, these are modern facilities. and for some reason, we are talking only about armored vehicles, artillery means have been added to this equipment, patriots are already against air defense. they say all who can only anti-tank weapons and all kinds of kit. all that is possible. this is a forecast, but in my opinion,

aviation will come to a stop only in one, in order to use aviation, long-term training of pilots is necessary. and if we talk about the saturation of ukrainians, after all, yes, they have digested such a volume of equipment that, in general, well, the last class, what it is called that you need to learn it you need to be able to use. uh, it means that in ukraine today we are talking not only about ukraine , today we are talking about a united west , including experts from military specialists, western states who, under the guise of mercenaries, are ready to fight in ukraine and, in my opinion , crews will be found for all this equipment and necessary specialists. and the most, probably, terrible thing is that practically any features are transferred in an escalating situation ; we are talking not only about defense. as they said today we are no longer talking about any. means

of some kind of anti-tank is not a means of protection there is a real question about the means of attack by any means to develop russia on the battlefield. that is, once again for the infantry video. yes, too, once again for the most naive. yes, that is, not russia, ukraine are fighting, but in reality, this is a war between the west and russia, if anyone does not understand it, until now. not that there is still a grip. yes, surprisingly, we are talking about the fact that the united west, through the hands of ukraine, is trying to weaken russia while destroying, belarus as an ally of the russian federation that the republic of belarus has never threatened. we always say that this is a regional grouping of forces, united with russia in order to deter in the event of aggression, so we are developing this grouping, according to plan. eh? you know, in 2021, uh, vgs,

approved the updated military doctrine of the union state, which we’ll already say now, so even the head of state said that it’s even becoming outdated, because events are developing very dynamically and uh, we, uh, are responding to the possible threats that here e are formed by such actions. uh, west well, look. and why did he ask specifically about the ukrainians in terms of the supply of weapons, because we are seeing that more and more generals, including you retired abroad, say that there are at least two factors. why equipment is not being transferred very well, for example, to ukraine for example, a retired vice-marshal of the british royal air force says the first destruction of equipment on the territory of ukraine is a blow to the reputation of manufacturers, and then how to sell these weapons. says that it the best, and the second point is that in order to use these machines, the ukrainians will have to go through a long training. and i will

also add a third point, which for some reason, again, does not say that it was about what the uk does not have. uh, normal serious ground forces and any transmission, so to speak. to whomever there were means of destruction, including tanks. this is a blow to their own armed forces, which are very difficult for them to replenish. welcome to our program. well, we are now talking about the fact that the transfer colossal forces that were previously concentrated. mostly in ukraine now in the immediate vicinity of our borders. here is your prediction. this is a provocation in order to escalate tension or is still preparing to strike in the near future. everyone thinks that poland is not ready for war and is not going to fight anymore, if we are talking about some kind of political action. they need to be considered in the context of the upcoming election campaign. well, in addition, you need to understand that nato e is not ready for a big war with the russian federation respectively, all this

talk about the fact that in ukraine russia is directly at war with nato in ukraine, russia is still with the ukrainians with the ukrainian armed forces, respectively, as a union state. but it’s just that nato supplies them in ukraine with a non-deployed division of a full-fledged brigade. yes, we see large deliveries of weapons, they are hundreds of units, these are quite high-quality weapons, they seriously affect the course of hostilities, and naturally there is military-political maneuvering in the region and from poland from the baltics, but while the main strategy. the west is to inflict a military defeat on the territory of ukraine to the russian federation. and the transfer of hostilities to the territory of belarus in the near future. well , no one like me, as we see, and they do not plan for analysis. it is possible only as an armed provocation. in the event that russia conducts a new major offensive operation there or , let’s say from the ukrainian side in order to stretch the front, it’s possible, well, firstly,

we shouldn’t discount that it’s more so reinforced today, but in military-technical terms, and has a good infrastructure for additional overload of troops, which is a potential threat, however , it comes from poland and in the near future will be able to independently carry out more, and operations of the local range, so they are ready to have the opportunity to issue in that, naturally, we expect that, taking into account its possibility and the allied state and other threats that, uh, potential may be from the side of the allied state, in including nuclear umbrella, they do not dare to do this regarding ukraine. ukraine was initially supervised by, uh, western experts, including the military. there were a lot of advisers who were introduced to the highest officers of the ukrainian army. there's a question. do zelensky's guards have their own people, besides? uh, the cia and other things, so understand that today the west is collective, using, a first of all,

the manpower of ukraine a, dropping old equipment , they are at war with the russian federation, but at the same time, because this is a matter of existential threat. they will amplify to the maximum degree. uh, apu with the aim of inflicting defeat on the russian federation and under the guise of pmcs of private lysed mercenary structures. the regular officers of the nato troops can calmly participate in this operation, but still i would note that poland is currently not ready to conduct any independent large-scale operations and will not be ready for the next 2-3 years. we see this in the planning of the polish armed forces, therefore, as for the junk that is dumped there, find out such junk, 232, how at least, and the howitzers that the americans supplied are 155 mm, the old 105 mm last year for a million shells, but this is not quite such a story. i want to say here are two interesting ambassadors, and in the development of the topic, two interesting messages. here is one side. ukraine has planned themselves from the world. there

, he flat on february 24, promises that he will present a plan for a peaceful settlement, well, of course, as you will see kiev, and on the other hand, at the same time, the secretary general. nato stoltenberg makes the same statement normalizing relations with western countries with russia will not come even after the end of the conflict in ukraine that's how to understand it, it means that russia simply does not have another chance, except for these until the end hmm what's the reality? uh, the script is already written, it is already written, it is anticipated in life and in this script. the main character from the point of view of the warring country so far is that ukraine and its forces in any way how to fight to the last ukrainians, but stoltenberg expresses a united interest. or so let's say the position of the west and it clearly says that so far we will not achieve our own goals set in ukraine, we will not stop, but the main goal. what a relaxation

of russia there is no relaxation of plants in russia. well, this is a distant task, the dismemberment of destruction. according to the documents, and in the initial, uh, two to the twentieth year, the strengthening of russia in the region and the contraction, it becomes a centripetal force, given its influence in the cis countries in the twentieth year 22, they planned the separation of ukraine, including the option there was a military conflict, the year 24 is designated as the year of the collapse of russia in one scenario. this script that is written. let's talk then about reality, and reality. this is nato's strategy, which was adopted literally last year, where it is written what they want, and it clearly says that the main enemy is russia, the main ones. e. so let's say the second china well, not the enemy, but the main strategic competitor. let's proceed from this, as a rule, nato acts according to its documents. and that is to give credit to the play.

for a long time we have already talked about this more than once, from which i bring nikolai evgenievich to the fact that here is the resistance to the conversation to the fact that the world is frozen in such an expectation that here in april in august sometime this peace talks take place. they finally say, well, we hear in parallel from those who constantly push the back of the ukrainians that even if peace happens, we will still continue. here is the confrontation. after all , today in ukraine it is being played out. uh, the element of redistribution of the world about it. it is clear to all analysts. e specialist, anyone and until it is resolved. the main task do not stop. well, what's going on here, eh one of the parties in the twenty-second year did not achieve its strategic goals. accordingly, in order to move to political regulation, they must demonstrate strength and inflict some kind of visible and presented to the world community a major military defeat, so that from a position

of strength, they impose certain negotiations on the other side about the final goals. the west is there or the collapse of russia, the relaxation of russia it seems to me that they still do not need to exaggerate them. eh, something so malicious that they sit and 10 years ahead. there, maybe someone thinks so, but those who make the decision , they are to a large extent you have encountered, they are situational, react, adapting to the situation, of course, do not want to defeat russia if this leads to the collapse of russia. they are even further, but not as analyzed. and how to manage these disintegrated there are so many new tasks, the answers to which they do not know here, nuclear weapons and interethnic conflicts and so on, but most importantly, they already consider. so i want so we see it is written that the twenty-second the year, as they consider it, became the year of the poly defeat of russia, and then they are already moving gradually to the next goal, china, and now they are thinking how to integrate russia into these new plans of theirs. in what form, therefore, it is not in vain that statements are made

that european architecture, security, and so on and so forth are impossible without russia. these two tracks are the classic american policy of pressure, that is, a whip and some kind of diplomatic traps. well, at the moment i want to point out the first one. e, unfortunately, i state the fact that already provoked this special military provocation by the usa in europe they have already achieved their goals, certain geopolitical ones they have weakened russia weakened its influence in the central asian region e. there are quite strong forces in the middle east. i will finish, which means that russia has been left quite strongly here in the region. first, second. uh, the fact that the military operation will end sooner or later. naturally. we count on it. naturally, we count on victory. in the russian federation but they are not going to dwell on the issue economic containment sanctions policies, and they are trying to strengthen. uh, the backlog of russia in terms of dark technology. at the same time, the americans will also play on contradictions. it's the perfect

scenario for them. still, the expansion of the escalation of this conflict, and we must prevent this, therefore, they not only want to limit themselves to ukraine and not only to us completing this military operation in the foreseeable future, but up to drawing poland and a number of others you strangely into this conflict quite right and about the threats that concern us and about the exodus of the company in ukraine, what will be reflected in it is quite obvious, but this confirms the basis and again the head of the estonian foreign ministry urs, reinsal at the webinar recently as much as the strategy of the democratic forces of belarus the head of the estonian foreign ministry we are very important, as if the democratic forces are running in belarus, he said that he connects the democratization of belarus with the outcome of the war in ukraine like this, therefore everything, like everything that is unfolding on the territory of ukraine, concerns us directly, if we if we proceed from the most favorable scenario for us, then we will not, if necessary, from a favorable scenario in advance, but we must see the obvious things, that is, it is

impossible, uh, and our analysis can not be carried out along the line of such a constant escalation. first, the west is afraid of a direct clash with the russian federation, our security officials spoke about this. we remember the briefing and the chairman of the state security committee and our military why because they carried out in the west, simulation of russian strategic e, forces, they are in good condition. we see received the poseidon torpedo and in the event that a threat to the russian federation really arises a. either the direct involvement of nato troops russia is ready to use all the forces of deterrence that they have, they understand this very well, they are afraid of a direct collision. they understand that the invasion of the territory of the republic of belarus by force. nato, this will mean, according to our military doctrine, an invasion of the territory of an allied state. and by their actions. they are very afraid. that's when the rockets flew in and

some statements, when the pranksters called and so on. that is, the west manages risks, first of all, the risks of nuclear war. we see nuclear war. they do not want to. yes , respectively, they are trying to defeat the existing economic yes diplomatic military forces, but why did the west not achieve the goal? here, speaking to belarus on this topic, which pops up, the rupture of relations between belarus and russia, the destruction of the integration community, the destruction of our military union has been and is one of the strategic civilizations of the west and it does not just didn't reach it. but as a result of a special military operation, they will see that we have become even more cooperative. yes, well, i want to say that well, it is no coincidence that this idea is such a loud statement about the world itself. come on, how can it be carried out without the participation of the russian federation of the people 's republic of china and where uh hmm on the other

hand. er, of course, uh, we also know the price of some international agreements, including the minsk e agreements. e. these statements by merkel landa, which, by the way, were very beneficial, probably the russian federation and. well, in some psychological ideological plan , in support of even sv e, we see the price of these agreements with whom to negotiate today, therefore, of course. it 's worth the task. uh, this is causing some damage to the russian federation, uh, of course, you know, and the resolutions of the us congress of the european parliament have been repeatedly adopted, where it is written in plain text that the west does not suit the union state, therefore, of course, uh,

an attempt to rebel. uh, 2020 was not a success, we survived and now the task. of course, uh continue to continue to strengthen the belarusian state. in continuation of a very interesting sociology came from the european union almost half of the inhabitants of the eu countries 48% are in favor of the war in ukraine to end as soon as possible, and these polls, which were conducted in nine countries, and without moldova and serbia, as if were even more indicative, so most of all, the soonest end of hostilities, and even at the cost of territorial losses of ukraine, the austrians and germans want more than 60% and something like this the same mood is also among the greeks among the italians among the spaniards. that is, people get tired very simply these countries, as the most prosperous for many years, most of all felt on themselves that

life can become worse, and they felt it not only because prices increased, household expenses increased, it became harder to live, and europe got used to it. live well for decades at the expense of the price of gas on other means. so let's say, for cheap energy and so on, and it is these people, when i always see all decisions go through you personally, if your life has become worse, then you must find it. the reason to get out of this situation. the reason is that help to ukraine, the war in ukraine and all the powerful ones here, and about the ukrainian propaganda in the european union, the vast majority are still, why themselves, in order to show that the impulses that russia gave readiness for negotiations, they do not veil and distort in their own information space.