they felt for themselves that life could get worse, and they felt it not only because prices increased, household expenses increased, it became harder to live, and europe got used to living well for decades at the expense of the price of gas for other means. so let's say, for cheap energy and so on, it is these people, when i always see all decisions go through you personally, if your life has become worse, then you must find a reason to get out of this situation. the reason is so help to ukraine the war in ukraine and all the powerful ones here, and about ukrainian propaganda in the european union, the vast majority are still. why do they themselves, in order to show that to raise the impulses that russia gave to the readiness for negotiations, they do not level and distort in their own information space . and this syme they will give out

for the fact that ukraine is ready on those conditions, they put forward some conditions for peace there 10 points. they present them as the only possible ones. the only fair but it is obvious that when one side absolutely does not want to hear the position of the other and the realities that already exist today, it is impossible to come to some kind of agreement, so they understand they are talking, and here i didn’t want to talk, i will draw today and involuntarily thought about him. and look, there is zelensky who does not want any negotiations at all, he has already said many times, then suddenly there is another figure of a person who, well, i’ll call it beautiful, of course, it’s not enough beautiful, but went into some kind of parallel, and trajectory before that to say that saying he did not mind. here to participate in the presidential race in parallel, medvedchuk appears some kind of his own article on news in the platform. maybe this is also, but these are still different situations, as far as history is concerned, there is no need to pump up and overestimate. the figure of arrestovich is political

adventurers, his entire biography. it goes like this , he has situational support based on the fact that he is one of the most popular bloggers. well , what he says about his adventurism is that he is there some adviser to the office, as if at work, he is not a member of the office. he wrote a statement there and states that he seems to have nothing to write about since he does not receive a salary. that is, this is a typical political do not give. well , you understand, who is behind him, there are no large groups behind him, as for medvedchuk, uh, ukrainian propaganda and the current government managed to create the image of such a pro-russian figure, he was deprived of his citizenship altogether. that is, the fact that on the territory of the russian federation there will be a consolidation of forces opposing zelensky. it's true. and this serious force cannot be underestimated, because if you look at the statistics. how many people she left ukraine and how many she left, including on the territory of the russian federation, to us, then these are hundreds of thousands of people on the territory of ukraine itself. there have long been hundreds of thousands, and maybe even

millions of people who share these pro-russian sentiments. medvedchuk can count on this audience but understandable in the current situation. this is a political figure, significant only in the territory that is not controlled by the regime. eh, zelensky and in terms of a peaceful settlement, again. let's get straight to the new major armed confrontation. whether it is a head-on battle, or an offensive operation by one of the parties, but you are talking about some serious peaceful steps, but you hardly have to throw weapons there for the wrong reason. that's it. well, you know, i didn't feel like talking, but still. in my opinion. again, i return to the thought of the price of the agreement. yes, it’s more, probably, it will still be a cover, uh, new arms supplies e strengthening the armed component of the exhibition. it’s understandable when everyone

asks the question, when will there be negotiations, negotiations, perhaps in the next case, when one of the parties is so weakened that it cannot, and to act to punish resistance not only militarily, but economic and so on, and you need to go for negotiations. that is, you need to agree to the terms and conditions for this to work properly. vadim frenchevich. said that another one round should happen, but unfortunately that a may not be one, unfortunately, we are most likely one round. i let's not confine ourselves to the second question. if one of the parties can either convince or force the beneficiaries to back down, yes, and this speaks to the united states of america if the russian federation well, it is somehow effective, well, the russian federation can be in the union with its partners in other steps, the united anglo-saxons abandon this project of destabilizing europe. but it is even more difficult, because they have invested money in it. and this is long term planning until either one side is weakened, either the beneficiary will not be interested in escalating this conflict. and colleagues continue

one more bash let's get closer to us. yes , everything is correct. we outlined it absolutely correctly, but on the context, but to touch on a very important issue. here from afar. i'll start ah. here we are saying, look at this survey of ordinary europeans. we see what they want, of course, as usual people. they want peace, they want the usual quiet life, but at the same time, with this one, we see that politicians are in the west. they are clearly using azurin tablets. uh, our nearest western neighbors are also poland and lithuania, because otherwise, how to perceive the way they behave with migrants, throwing them, uh, into our territory through this fence, often no longer alive. here is january 12, the last case when three corpses were on the border between belarus and poland in parallel. we see that the european court of human rights allowed poland to send illegal migrants back to belarus . we conclude that further, most likely, they will give a license to shoot these people. and why not? wouldn't that be illogical? continuation

and then we move on completely, we remember the words of the barrel, but about the marvelous garden and the jungle, we understand that, probably, we need to understand that in the eyes of the west they are only africans, and not only separately afghans, but also russian belarusians, ukrainians - this is also the jungle here too smoothly. i come to the question that, in general, alexander lukashenko proposed to the whole society during christmas, when he spoke in the temple and said, maybe now is the time to take a step forward for those, at least, who realized who left , just on a wave of emotions or who is ready to suffer? it seems to me that these two topics have been gracefully taken. why do you keep doing? i want to say that either they are already trying to answer this question, or the thief's connection, i'll start with a direct one, since we see the signals. what are these? uh, how can a certain number of our citizens leave, right? let's look at them objectively too. they didn’t get settled there,

look what kind of criticism is going on, but these runaway structures that all sorts of things have been created there, there are some kind of offices there, any interview that is going on from their side is just a flurry negative comments why, but after all, many people know, firstly, someone went on the wave of such political euphoria, and a year has already passed, the second, nothing changes. and they have these ideological euphoria gone. they call them there. uh, newly called neophytes, and so on, others thought, they will go under the political wave, we will decide to live there, the economic issues have become worse, few people have begun to live better. so what is happening. we see more than one case when they go there, but to treat their teeth to buy glasses. it means getting medical attention. come here the question arises. on what basis, if you continue to enjoy the benefits of the belarusian state? have

a belarusian passport, so then you will decide on your position, listen. we've made a special request here. now here is a small block to illustrate to our viewers, that is, not our poll, we looked at a special opposition resource, because we saw that they were also trying to ventilate. but how did people react, being in poland to lithuania, to the words belarusian president. they were probably disappointed, because the vast majority either have already returned or are about to return in their thoughts. let's see. now let's listen to a certain alexander, a developer of a large it-company. here is what he said with his wife spent 9 months in exile, there were two reasons for leaving. the first war. in ukraine, the second customer of the project did not want to cooperate with belarusian offices. we decided to relocate to turkey, then the idea arose to move to poland, but we realized that it would be financially necessary for us to live there hard. as a result, when you returned to belarus , there is always a risk that they might come and arrest you, but when you arrived in minsk, you even began

to sleep better. my wife and i want to live in belarus , here is our home, not our selection for those who try to teach us that we are falsifying the facts , this is a person on the opposition resource. speaks his thoughts. here nikolayevich how do you like my position next? i would clearly explain that there is a house, a house is here and the walls help. and this is understood by most people and the message of the president, who is with you all we heard we heard, but thank god people heard from behind the cordon. come back here waiting for you. you made a mistake, but the motherland is ready to forgive you. this is the first method of the second. eh, no one needs anyone anywhere, except at home, if you work here, you find your own niche in public life. here you can develop and reach certain boundaries and certain heights, what

this young man is talking about, i hope, who went abroad and is engaged in the it-sphere. many who left. today they realized that they it would be better for belarus that life in belarus is in no way worse. let's just say the phrase is no worse than europe and most importantly. here he is a citizen, protected in many respects, on many issues, and the state is ready. give him a guarantee. here's a couple more examples. some of their forums, something again, everything is taken from not about state resources, which means that a couple of quotes from s15 and twenty familiar it people are clearly satisfied with the move 3-4, the rest would like to go back, but cannot. they participated in shares are afraid of detention others got a new job abroad next. i think the situation in belarus is not lurking that ukraine has transferred part of the troops to the north. here we see to think. so, and the reconciliation of the war of

accounting specialties is a formality, when i arrived in minsk, i even began to sleep better in batumi, we often remembered minsk saying that our streets were wider, services were better, the situation with possible detention was also not frightening on the march. i didn't go. in the end, we decided to return. and finally, one of my friends returned and for a photo in the phone was on the day, and after leaving the isolation ward. he decided to leave him more, he said he had already done his time. they want to have already tried to manipulate the president's speech. he urged to come, but said that those who committed the crime will answer and still they will speak clearly here. listen, they started to manipulate intimidate. well, first of all, on what day it was said there. it was a holy feast in a holy place. that is, it was clearly a message to take such a step forward. why are they confusing? here is vadim from you, that i am them i'll explain now. well, i want to finish my thought. that is, it was a step forward

step forward, and uh, you see, we are a family, we are a family, uh, the president is the head of the family, and we want to see members of our family, even those who stumbled. after all, we forgive our children. we instruct them somewhere, maybe we punish them, but nevertheless, they are our children. therefore, in general, belarus demonstrates that we, as a family, are ready to live together with those who are not ready to embark on the path of betrayal, why do they do it ? uh, well, they want us apply different. it's coming, a hybrid war. and there are different elements of hybrid warfare. this informational economic undermining of the demographic situation. maybe it's even easier, maybe for them, for these runaway offices. this is just a fodder base, and how in general today a white-and-white office is kept for one purpose, so that svetlana at x-hour can call on foreign military contingents to enter the territory of belarus or seal it. uh, foreign intervention. more. he doesn't need anything anymore. and what and what pastovo leaves her. this still completely destroys her position there, but you

look today. and they have two agendas. the first call to bomb. actually, earlier. they called for sanctions and for exerting economic pressure. the network part in almost every speech of this or that opposition representative, who is abroad, discusses issues. how to cause military damage to belarus after the cities? there is one more thing that we have to pay reparations to ukraine at any moment, they are discussing. why u not that way allocated financial resources. that is, they share the money. all. well, here e it is clear that if there is such a return, this is another defeat for the party team. well, let's just say no. there is no tikhanovskaya team there. this means that this office is another defeat, because they represent some even inflated mass character of this belarusian migration. they say they represent them. yes, they are now solving some of their problems, and when people are already turning away from it, this is another defeat, the next moment, but still, let's take into account the mood of our

patriotic community. the president hears. they say there was a declaration of omniscience , time passed. now a new statement. why? because our citizens are those who defended belarus in the twentieth year and then hand over the right questions, well, they will return. they'll come back from sitting there. there, someone will not serve a day in public, somehow they will not show themselves. whether they will create some sleeping cells, how sincere this repentance will be, this discussion is ongoing in patriotic circles. and we ignore it. we can’t, such a danger also exists, because now they went to turkey to show the pros and show them. we also know cases when examples were analyzed, we first went to georgia and lived. events began in ukraine there, the owner comes, they are expelled from work, they are expelled from the apartment, the renters say, come back to belarus, complete what you did not do in the twentieth year, where we have guarantees. the fact that these people, having returned, will not continue this activity and these questions are asked by our

citizens, therefore, such a decision is not in vain the president. he handles this narrative. this is very correct, but it offers a certain public discussion, because there are different points of view. and here the deputies must also have their say, because there must be a balance of national security, national reconciliation and the strengthening of our society. eh, get things. right. you can't declare them and the deputies that we are not. we, those who left, will not let the country go. we have criminal administrative and other codes, if i committed an offense, people are literate we are not alone, we do not hide the creative legislative act, and he knows under which article it passes, and he knows that there is a concept of effective repentance, cooperation with the investigation, assistance if he did not commit a violation of the right, and it was some kind of economic migration , or migration associated with certain fears, which were caused by speculations of him there e familiar