it is the work, well, the work looks at us about people. i love you immensely what robs and robs what loves, look at the belarusian project on our tv channel.

hello, i welcome everyone who is with us now, we are very glad to see the guests of our program. as we can see that some of our experts will join in the conversation today. we are looking forward to vadim hygiene, there are many topics that we want to discuss and understand, here are some that our region and our entire global space are developing today, but let's start, that's what the ukrainian regime is here for. suddenly i decided to roll out personal sanctions against our colleagues. this is alexander pokovsky. this is gregory azaryonok our says tour. this is ctb general director alexander osenko. ah. we are already accustomed to

and understand that, as a rule, or rather, they always mark the most worthy with sanctions, these are worthy people who serve the fatherland, who have not caved in in the twentieth, who have previously shown themselves with dignity and we will not succumb to sanctions pressure, but we will demonstrate confidence that we are acting in accordance with the national interests of our own country and are capable of developing and responding to these sanctions with dignity despite the sanctions. well, indeed, our colleagues are ironic. at least on this score. yes, and there someone can attach a stronger word. i think that from this list you understand who. well, here we go again. here is a similar topic. uh, for the sake of freshness, they called for severing relations with belarus sounds loud, but then we read who exactly and we see that the deputy verkhovna rada aleksey goncharenko famous. well, freak, to put it mildly, so to speak, and

the verkhovna rada in the politics of ukraine announced the creation of a petition with an appeal. to break off diplomatic relations with minsk, sergei anatolyevich should take this seriously. well , this is first, not the first attempt not the first statement and uh, of course, uh. members are happy individual members are happy, they are always striving, pr. i think that this is hmm, if it can be called an event, it should be attributed precisely to the category of personal pr, nothing more, uh, extraordinary plenipotentiary, the village of ukraine continues to work in minsk e, no official statements are made. that is, it is absolutely e one two days. um, well, the news all agrees on that, so we just throw it aside, then we throw in the trash such news and such politicians, but that's it. not we. this is already doing itself, the story is much more disturbing things much more

disturbing messages are coming hmm from the westerners. what is called the flanks, and in the dutch port listing, american military equipment is massively transferred tanks abrams bmp bradley and self-propelled howitzers paladin approximately 1.250 units from the netherlands. the equipment goes to lithuania and poland to strengthen the eastern flank. nato technology. it’s not just offensive with high cross-country ability, which is clearly not for the defense of europe, plus duda’s decision to transfer a company of leopardo 2 tanks to kiev as part of an international coalition, plus a macron with imx wheeled tanks, and the british with challenge tanks. but nikolaev evgenievich these people will point fingers at the regional grouping saying that their teachings threaten regional security. you see, even with your thoughts you have already given a clear understanding of what is happening. uh, i’m used to, uh, operate with numbers and talk about specific events about specific events, if the previous moment, when

the break in relations was a fake, you can’t call it differently, then here the reality of thousands of pieces of equipment came to a certain territory. they are moving towards our borders. uh, but all this must be considered. in general, the context of the purchase is the planned purchase of poland, thousands of units of tanks for example. at the moment, france has its consisting of 406 objects, only germany 220 great britain 227 and germany 248. these are the figures that exist in europe today, the reality of more or less modern technology. i plan to talk about 1,000 tanks. the question is why and who definitely needs them, not to stand near our borders and drink coffee here in neighboring poland, lithuania or estonia, these are definitely attacking means. and most importantly - these are modern

means. and for some reason, we are talking only about armored vehicles ; artillery means have been added to this vehicle, against air defense are already patriots. they say, if possible, uh, anti-tank weapons and all sorts of kits of everything that is possible. this is a forecast, but in my opinion, aviation will come to a stop only in one, in order to use aviation, long-term training of pilots is necessary. and if we talk about the saturation of the ukrainians, after all, yes, they will digest such a volume of equipment, which, in general, well, the last class, what is called this, what you need to learn, you need to be able to use it. uh, so it's just scrap metal, as it is in ukraine today not only about ukraine, today we are talking about a united west, including experts from military specialists , western states who, under the guise of

mercenaries, are ready to fight in ukraine and, in my opinion, crews and the necessary specialists will be found for all this equipment. and the most, probably, terrible thing is that practically any features are transferred in an escalating situation; we are talking not only about defense. as they said today, we are no longer talking about some. funds from some anti-tank weapons do not go means of protection there is a real question about the means attacks by any means to develop russia on the battlefield. that is, once again for the infantry video. yes, too, once again for the most naive. yes, that is, not russia, ukraine are fighting, but really this is a war between the west and russia, if anyone does not understand it, still not for themselves. yes , we are talking about the fact that the united west , through the hands of ukraine, is trying to weaken russia while

destroying belarus as an ally of the russian federation, which the republic of belarus has never threatened. we always say that this is a regional grouping of forces, united with russia in order to restrain in case of aggression, so we are developing this grouping, according to plan. eh? you know, in 2021, uh, vgs, approved the updated military doctrine of the union state, which we’ll already say now, so even the head of state said that it ’s even becoming outdated, because events are developing very dynamically and uh, we, uh, are responding to those possible threats that are formed by such actions. uh, west well , look. and why did he ask about the ukrainians specifically in terms of the supply of weapons, because we are seeing that more and more generals, including retired abroad , suggests that there are at least two

factors. why equipment is not being transferred very well, for example, to ukraine for example, a retired vice-marshal of the british royal air force says the first destruction of equipment on the territory of ukraine is a blow to the reputation of manufacturers, and then how to sell these weapons. he says that it is the best, and the second point is that in order to use these machines, ukrainians will have to go through a long training. and i will add the third point, which for some reason, again, does not say that it was that the uk does not have. uh, normal serious ground forces and any transmission, so to speak. to whomever there were means of destruction, including tanks. this is a blow to their own armed forces, which are very difficult for them to replenish. welcome to our program. well, we are now talking about the fact that the transfer of colossal forces, which were previously concentrated. mostly in ukraine now in the immediate vicinity from our borders. here is your prediction. this is a provocation in order to escalate tension or still prepare to strike in the

near future. i think that poland is not ready for war and is not going to fight anymore, if we are talking about some kind of political action. they need to be considered in the context of the upcoming election campaign. well, in addition, you need to understand that nato e is not ready for a big war with the russian federation, respectively, an allied state, all this talk that in ukraine russia is directly fighting nato on ukraine russia is still with the ukrainians with the ukrainian armed forces. but it’s just that nato supplies them in ukraine, not a full-fledged division, not a brigade. yes, we see large deliveries of weapons, they are hundreds of units, these are fairly high-quality weapons, they seriously affect the course of hostilities, and naturally there is military-political maneuvering in the region and from poland from the baltics, but so far the main strategy of the west is to inflict on the

russian federation military defeat on the territory of ukraine a postponement of hostilities on the territory of belarus in the near future. well , no one like me, as we see, and they do not plan for analysis. it is possible only as an armed provocation. in the case of conducting russia and a new major offensive operation there, or let's say from the ukrainian side in order to stretch the front. perhaps, firstly, it should not be discounted that today it is more strengthened, and in military-technical terms , and has good infrastructure for additional overload of troops, which is a potential threat, nevertheless, there is comes from poland and in the near future will be able to independently carry out, and operations of a local range , so they are ready to have the opportunity to question what is natural, we expect that, taking into account its capabilities and the allied state and other threats, which, uh, potential may be from the side of the union state, including

nuclear umbrella, they will not decide on this regarding ukraine. ukraine was initially supervised by, uh, western experts, including the military. there were a lot advisers who were introduced to the highest officers of the ukrainian army. there's a question. do zelensky's guards have their own people, besides? uh, the cia and other things, so understand that today the west is collective, using, a first of all, the manpower of ukraine a, dropping old equipment, they are at war with the russian federation, but at the same time, because this is a matter of existential threat. they will amplify to the maximum degree. uh, apu with the aim of inflicting defeat on the russian federation and under the guise of pmcs of private lysed mercenary structures. calmly maybe regular officers of nato troops are participating in this operation, but still i would note that poland is currently not ready to conduct any independent large-scale operations and will not be ready for the next 2-3 years. we see this in the planning of the polish armed forces,

therefore, as for the junk that they dump there, find out such junk, at least 232, and the howitzers that the americans put, they are 155 mm, the old 105 mm last year for a million shells, but it's not really such a story. i want to say ah there are two interesting messages in the development of the topic. here is one side. ukraine planned this world themselves. there he flat on february 24, promises that he will present a plan for a peaceful settlement, well, of course, what you saw, but on the other hand at the same time, the secretary general. nato stoltenberg makes such a statement normalization of relations with western countries with russia will not come even after the end of the conflict in ukraine here's how to understand this, it means that russia simply does not have another chance, except for these to the end hmm and with the fact that reality, uh, scenario already written. he already written is anticipated in life and in this scenario. the main protagonist from the point of view of

the country at war so far is that ukraine and its forces in any way how to fight to the last ukrainian, but stoltenberg expresses a united interest. or let's say the position of the west and it clearly says that until we achieve our own goals set in ukraine, we will not stop, but the main goal. what relaxation russia is not. well, that's a long way off. dismemberment, according to the documents, and the original uh two to the twentieth year strengthening of russia in the region and contraction. it becomes a centripetal force and increases its influence in the cis countries. for the twentieth year, 22, they planned the separation of ukraine, including the option of a military conflict; in 24, russia was designated let's talk about reality then, but reality. this is the nato strategy that was adopted

literally last year, where it is written what they want, and it clearly says that russia is the main enemy. uh, so to speak, and the second china well, my opponent, and competition is the main strategic competitor. let's proceed from this, as a rule, nato acts according to its documents. and it does justice to the plays. it is in debt. we have already talked about this more than once. why didn’t i bring yevgenievich to the fact, so join the conversation to the fact that the world is frozen in such an expectation that there, in april in august , once this peace talks take place. they finally say, well, we hear in parallel from those who constantly push the back of the ukrainians that even if peace happens, we will still continue. this protest is already being played out in ukraine today. uh, the element has remade the world about it. it is clear to all analysts. e specialist, anyone and until it is

resolved. the main task do not stop. well, what is happening here, and not one of the parties in the twenty-second year has not reached its strategy. accordingly, in order to move on to political regulation, they must demonstrate strength and inflict some kind of visible and presented to the world community a major military defeat, so that from a position of strength they impose on the other side those or other negotiations about ultimate goals. the west is there or the collapse of russia, the relaxation of russia it seems to me that they still do not need to exaggerate them. uh, some kind of such a malicious one that they sit for 10 years ahead. there, maybe someone thinks so, but those who make the decision, they largely encountered you, adjusting to the situation, of course, do not want to defeat russia if this leads to the collapse of russia. they are even further, and not how they analyze . and how to manage these disintegrated. yes they are worth it there are so many new tasks that they do not know how to answer, including nuclear weapons and interethnic

conflicts and so on, but most importantly, they already count. so i want so we see it is written that 22 years old, as they think. since the year of russia's political defeat has become, and then they are already gradually moving towards the next goal, china, and now they are thinking how to integrate russia into these new plans of theirs. in what form, therefore, it is not in vain that there are statements that european architecture, security, and so on are impossible without russia. further and so on. these two tracks are the classic american policy of pressure, that is, a whip and some kind of diplomatic traps, but at the moment i want to overtake. first. e, unfortunately, i state the fact that the us has already provoked this special military provocation in europe, they have already achieved their goals, they have defined geopolitical weakened russia, weakened its influence in the central asian region e. there are quite strong forces in the middle east. i will finish. i mean, i

left russia quite strongly here in the region. first second. uh, the fact that the military operation will end sooner or later. naturally, we count on it. we are counting on the victory of the russian federation. but they are not going to stop on the issue of economic containment of sanctions policies, but they are trying to strengthen them. uh, the backlog of russia in terms of dark technology. at the same time, the americans will also play on contradictions. it's the perfect scenario for them. still, the expansion of the escalation of this conflict, and, but we must prevent this, so they not only want to confine ourselves to ukraine and not only to ensure that we complete this military operation in the foreseeable future, but up to drawing poland and a number of others strangely into this conflict. quite right about the threats that concern us and about the exodus of the company in ukraine, then that will affect it is quite obvious, but it confirms the basis and again the head of the estonian foreign ministry urs. reisal at a webinar recently, and the strategy of the democratic forces of belarus the head

of the estonian foreign ministry we are very important, how the democratic forces in belarus will live, said that he connects the democratization of belarus with the outcome of the war in ukraine, which is why everything, like everything that is unfolding on the territory of ukraine, concerns us directly, if we proceed from the most favorable scenario for us, then we will not accept in advance the need to eat from a favorable scenario, but we have to see the obvious things, that is, you can't, uh, and our analysis follow the line of such a constant escalation. first, the west is afraid of a direct clash with the russian federation, our security officials spoke about this. we remember the briefing and the chairman of the state security committee and our military why because they were carried out in the west, simulation of russian strategic e, forces, they are in good condition. we see the poseidon torpedo arrived and in case there really is a threat to the russian federation a. either the direct involvement of

nato troops russia is ready to use all the forces of deterrence that they have, they understand this very well, they are afraid of a direct collision. they understand that the invasion of the territory of the republic of belarus by force. nato this will mean, according to our military doctrine, an invasion of the territory of an allied state. and by their actions. they are very afraid. that's when the rockets flew in and some statements, when the pranksters, dud called, and so on. that is, the west manages risks, first of all, the risks of nuclear war. we see nuclear war. they do not want to. yes , respectively, they are trying to defeat the existing economic yes diplomatic military forces, but why did the west not achieve the goal? that's saying belarus this topic, which pops up a break in relations between belarus and russia, the destruction of the integration community, the destruction of our military union has been and is one of the strategic civilizations of the west, and not only has it not been achieved. that, but as a result of a

special military operation, they will see that we have become even more employees. they were brought to belarus by work, study and love. my name is alexei verkhoven. first of all, i am a nasiphonic conductor. and i came from russia. i want to do an internship already like in belarus, and after that i will start working as a doctor. every hero has its own unique history and its own view of belarus, but in fact, the theater is the bolshoi theater of belarus we see from russia in the same way as you see marinka in russia for us it is, well, the bolshoi bolshoi theater with a history with a reputation, the belarusian people for a very long time even the belarusian anthem begins. we are peaceful people in belarus. very nervous people. very nervous people, very calm people. yes , willing and hard-working, see the

program view of belarus on our channel. ecological culture and we also do not forget about the classics. see every week in the fashion culture project. i want to say that well, it’s no coincidence that this idea is such a loud statement by timir dan themselves , how can it be carried out without the participation of the

russian federation of the people’s republic of china and where uh hmm on the other hand. uh, of course, we also know the price of some international agreements, including the minsk agreements. uh, here are the statements of merkel landa, which, by the way, played very much in favor of, probably, the russian federation and. well, in some psychological ideologically in support of even e svo. we see the price of these agreements with whom to negotiate today, therefore, of course . e task. uh, it’s worth uh, this is causing some damage to the russian federation , uh. of course, you know, and the resolutions of the us congress of the european parliament were repeatedly adopted, where

it is written in plain text that the west is not satisfied with the union state, therefore, of course, uh, an attempted rebellion. uh, 2020 was not a success, we survived and now the task. of course, uh, continue to continue to strengthen the belarusian states. in a very interesting continuation, sociology came from the european union almost half of the inhabitants of the eu countries 48% are in favor of the war in ukraine ending as soon as possible, and these polls, which were conducted in nine countries, and without the young and serbia, there would be figures they were still showing me the most speedy end of hostilities, and even at the cost of territorial losses of ukraine, although the austrians and germans there are more than 60%, and the greeks and the italians have about the same mood spaniards people get tired very simply these countries,

as the most prosperous for many years, most of all felt that life could become worse, and they felt it not only because prices increased, household expenses increased, it became harder to live, and europe got used to living well for decades at the expense of the price of gas for other means. so let's say, uh, from cheap energy and so on, and it is these people, when i see all decisions always go through you personally. if your life has become worse, then must find a reason to get out of this situation. the reason is that with the help of ukraine, the war in ukraine and everything and powerful e about ukrainian propaganda in the european union, the vast majority is still the vast majority, why are you with you in order to show that the impulses that russia

gave readiness for negotiations, they they misrepresent and distort in their own information space, and they will pass off this summit as if ukraine is ready on those terms. they put forward some conditions for peace there 10 points. they them presented as the only possible ones. the only thing that is fair, but it is obvious that when one side absolutely does not want to listen to the position of the other and the realities that already exist today, it is impossible to come to an agreement, so they understand they are talking, and here i did not want to talk, i will draw today and involuntarily thought about it. yes, and look, there is zelensky who does not want any negotiations at all, he has already said many times about this, then suddenly there is another figure of a person who, well, i will call it beautiful of course, beautiful in this. but he went into a parallel one, and before that, to say that he said that he was not against participating in the presidential race in parallel, medvedchuk appeared some kind of article of his own there. she is famous in the platform. maybe this is also prepared,

this is still a different situation, as for the arrest officer, there is no need to pump up and overestimate this figure of the arrest officer - this is a political adventurer and his entire biography. it's shaping up like this, he has situational support based on being one of the most popular bloggers, but about his adventurism is evidenced by the fact that he is there some kind of adviser to the office, as if at work, he is not a member of it. that is, this is a typical political do not give. well , you understand, who is behind him, behind him are some large groups, as for medvedchuk, uh, ukrainian propaganda and the current government managed to create an image of such a pro-russian figure, he was deprived of citizenship altogether. that is, what will be on the territory of the russian federation there will be a consolidation of forces opposing zelensky. it's true. and this serious force cannot be underestimated, because if you look at the statistics, how many left ukraine and how many left, including for

the territory of the russian federation, to us, then these are hundreds of thousands of people on the territory of ukraine itself , there are still hundreds of thousands, and maybe millions of people who share these pro-russian sentiments medvedchuk can count on this audience, but understandably. in the current situation. this is a political figure significant only in the territory that is not under the control of the regime. eh, zelensky and in terms of a peaceful settlement, again. let's put it straight before a major armed clash, whether it's a head-on battle or an offensive operation by one of the parties, but you're talking about some serious peaceful steps, but it's hardly necessary to throw weapons there for the wrong reason. that's it. more. well, you know, i didn't feel like talking, but still. in my opinion. again, returning to the thought of the price agreement. yes, it's probably more there will be cover. e new arms supplies. the strengthening of the armed component of the armed forces, yes

, tv viewers, it’s clear when everyone asks a question, when there will be negotiations, negotiations, perhaps in the next case, when one of the parties is so donkey that it cannot, and there is resistance not only militarily , but economically and so on and forced to negotiate. that is, you need to agree to the terms and conditions for this to work correctly. vadim frenchevich. said another one more round to go, but unfortunately, a maybe and not one, unfortunately, we are most likely one round. i will not confine myself to the second question. if one of the parties can either convince or force the beneficiary to back down. yes, and it says to the united states of america, if the russian federation had any action, well, the russian federation could be in an alliance. with its e partners in international dialogue could force other steps, united with the anglo-saxons, to abandon this project of destabilizing europe but it is even more difficult, because they have invested in it and money. and this is long-term planning

until either one side is weakened, or the beneficiary is not interested in escalating. this conflict will continue colleagues one more. let's get closer to us . yes, everything is correct . we outlined it absolutely correctly, but on the context, but sorting out a very important issue from afar and i’ll start ah. here we are saying, look at this question of ordinary europeans. we see what they want, of course, as usual people. they want peace, they want the usual quiet life, but at the same time, with this one, we see that politicians in the west. they obviously use pills, azurin. uh, our closest western neighbors are also poland and lithuania, because otherwise, how to perceive only they behave with migrants, throwing them, uh, into our territory through the fence. the place is no longer alive, here is january 12, the last time when three corpses were on the border between belarus and poland in parallel. we see that the european court of human rights allowed poland to send illegal migrants back to belarus . we conclude that further, most likely, they will give

a license to shoot these people. why not and no? wouldn’t it be illogical to continue and then we’ll move on completely and none of them are the essence of them in parallel, we remember the words of the barel, but in a marvelous garden and jungle and understand that, probably, we need to understand that in the eyes of the west, not only frikans, and not only separately afghans, well, russian belarusians, ukrainians - this is also the jungle and here smoothly. i come to the question that, in general, alexander lukashenko proposed to the whole society during christmas, when he spoke in the temple and said, maybe now is the time to to take a step forward for those, at least, who realized who left, just on a wave of emotions or who is ready to suffer? how did you gracefully link these two themes? yes why are you leading to do? i want to say that either they are already trying to answer this question, or the sea will begin to have a direct connection, since we see signals. what are these? uh, how can a certain

number of our citizens leave, right? let's look at it objectively as well. they settled there. no, look at the criticism . but these runaway structures that are there all sorts of offices have been created, there are some offices of any interview that goes on from their side there is just a flurry of negative comments. why do so many people know? firstly, someone went in the future on the wave of such political euphoria, and a year has already passed, the second one does not change anything. and they have passed these ideological farias , they call them there these, and the newly called neophytes and so on, others thought, they will go under the political wave, we will solve economic issues there. life has become worse, few people have begun to live better. means what happening. we see more than one case when they go there, but to treat their teeth to buy glasses. it means getting medical attention. come here the question arises. on what

basis, if you continue to enjoy the benefits of the belarusian state, do you have a belarusian passport? so then you decide on yours. we've made a special request here. now here is a small block to illustrate to our viewers. that is, not our poll, we looked at the opposition resource on purpose, because we saw that they were also trying to screw things up. a how people reacted while being in poland to lithuania to the words of the belarusian president. they were probably disappointed, because the vast majority have either already returned or are about to return their thoughts. let's get a look. now let's listen to a certain alexander, a major developer of these companies. that's what he said with his wife spent nine months in exile, there were two reasons for leaving. the first war in ukraine, the second customer of the project did not want to cooperate with the belarusian offices. we decided to go to turkey later there was an idea to move to poland, but we realized that it would be financially difficult for us to live there. as a result, when you returned to belarus

, there is always a risk that they can come and arrest you. but when i arrived in minsk, i even began to sleep better. my wife and i want to live in belarus , here is our home, not our selection for those who try to turn us on, that we are juggling the facts, this is a person on the opposition resource, he says to his thoughts. here nikolaevich, how do you like that? you know, my position is next. i would clearly explain that there is a house, a house, here and walls help. and this is understood by the majority of people and the message of the president, who heard everything with you. we heard, thank you. god heard from behind the cordon people. come back here waiting for you. you made a mistake, but the motherland is ready to forgive you. this is the first message, the second message nobody needs anywhere, except at home. if you work here, you find your own niche in public life. you

can develop here and reach a certain limit and certain heights, what this young man is talking about, i hope, who went abroad and is engaged in the it-sphere. many. who left. today they realized that they would be better off in belarus, that life in belarus is in no way worse. let's just say the phrase is no worse than europe and most importantly. here he is a citizen, protected in many respects, on many issues, and the state is ready. give him a guarantee. here to give a couple more examples of something from their forums , something again. everything solid is taken from not about state resources, which means, but a couple of quotes from fifteen twenty friends 3-4 it people happy with the move the rest would like to go back, but they can't . further. i think the situation in belarus is

being aggravated so that ukraine will transfer part of the troops to the north to think about this. so, and reconciliation of the war of accounting specialties is a formality, when i arrived in minsk, i even began to sleep in batumi, we often remembered minsk, they said that our street is wider, services, products are better, the situation with possible detention also did not frighten on the march, and they walked. in the end, we decided to return. and finally, one of my friends came back and ended up on the phone for a day for a photo. and after leaving the detention center, he decided not to leave anymore, he said he had already served his time, firstly, they even tried to manipulate the president’s statement. he urged to come, but said that those who committed the crime will answer, and anyway they will speak clearly here, they began to manipulate intimidate. well, first of all, on what day it was said there. it was a holy feast in a holy place. that is, it was unequivocally the message is such a step forward. why are they confusing? here vadim, here is your opinion, what

does not suit them. i'll explain now. well, i want to finish my thought. that is, e, it was a step forward step forward, and er, you see, we are a family, we are the family of the president, so the head of the family, and we want to see members of our family , even those who stumbled. after all, we forgive our children somewhere, we instruct them somewhere, maybe we punish them, but nevertheless, these are our children. therefore, in general, belarus demonstrates that we, as a family, are ready with those who do not willing to take the path of betrayal to live together, why do they do it? well, they want to give us different ones. it's coming, a hybrid war. and there are different elements of hybrid warfare. this informational economic undermining of the demographic situation. maybe it's even easier, maybe for them, for these runaway offices. this is just a food base, and as soon as they are at all, and today i will keep the cabinet for one purpose, so that svetlana at x-hour can call on foreign military contingents to enter the territory of belarus or seal e foreign intervention more. she

doesn't need anything anymore. and what and what leaves her pasta. this still definitively humiliates her position there, but you look today. and they have two agendas. the first call to bomb. in fact, they used to call for sanctions and how to put economic pressure on them every hour, in almost every speech, some or other representatives of the opposition who are abroad discuss issues. how to inflict military damage on belarusian cities. if one more thing that we have to pay reparations? they discuss why financial resources are not distributed in the right way. that is, they share the money. all. well, here e it is clear that if there is such a return, this is another defeat for the party team. well, let's just say there is no tikhanovskaya team there. so, uh, this office is another defeat, because they represent some kind of even inflated mass character of this belarusian emigration. they say they represent them. yes, they are now solving them and some problems, and when people are already

turning away from them. it's another defeat the next moment, but still let's take into account the mood of our patriotic public. the president hears. they say there was a declaration of omniscience, time passed. now a new statement. why? because our citizens are those who defended belarus in the twentieth year, and then ask the right questions, well, they will return. they'll come back from sitting there. there, someone for a day, someone no, sits in public, somehow they will not show themselves. will they create it? what cells dormant how sincere will this repentance be the discussion is going on in patriotic circles, and we ignore it. we can’t, such a danger also exists, because here are the pros and show they moved to turkey . we also know cases when examples were analyzed, we first went to georgia and lived. events began in ukraine there, the owner comes, they are expelled from work, they are expelled from the apartment , the renters say, come back to belarus , complete what you didn’t do in the twentieth year, where we

have guarantees that these people, when they return, will not continue this activity for children and these questions are asked by our citizens, therefore, such a decision and not in vain the president. he handles this narrative. this is very correct, but it offers a certain public discussion, because there are different points of view. and here the deputies must also have their say, because there must be a balance of national security, national reconciliation and the strengthening of our society. that's right, you can't declare them and the deputies that we are not the ones who left, we will not let them into the country. we have a criminal administrative and other code, if literate people committed an offense, we are not alone. uh, we don’t hide the norm of a creative legislative act, and he knows under which article it passes, and he knows that there is the concept of active repentance , cooperation with the investigation, assistance if he did not commit a violation of the law, and it was some kind of economic migration, or

migration , associated with certain fears that were caused by speculations of him there, familiar neighbors and relatives. this is one question. and if he committed a crime anyway questions because it is still possible, the social basis for a new attempt at rebellion. no, special services should work for this. but we cannot at the state level declare here at the state level. we do not have the right to return, no one says so to those who committed the crime, on the contrary, he says, come back, look what. an interesting topic indeed. we now see that those transitional offices, they are now in every possible way, but will interfere with returning to these people. they firstly discredit the processes everything is clear with this, but you understand, books are published about the protests in the twentieth year, where in the photographs there are a lot of faces of those people who went to the protests, for which, in order to create tension, they did not have, but in parallel we see how they die these polkinovskys are there, supposedly inflated there, i

can’t do well here, klimovsky’s regiments and a co- worker, probably azarov just to make up for these losses, which means it will begin now and recruiting is an important factor, yes, and at the expense of whom they will be replenish the shelves, for sure, if people in poland lithuania which are now in an extremely collaborative position and can create such conditions for them, when the only way to survive anything is to get into such an execution at least to continue for a moment. pay attention recently. even on our territory, a citizen of georgia who clearly says that i wanted to come to ukraine to improve my financial situation and pay off my debts. i'm almost sure that there are the same people among our departed, who, well , have nowhere to go, and we put them before the fact, either you go to war, or you go it is not clear where, or you have no future in general, no one person, let's give it now. after all, we have been working for the last 2 years, and now the parliamentarians, together with state

bodies, have been very actively working on, strengthening our legal space for adoption. new laws and, let's say, updating those laws that already, let's say, required updating, so we must, and, uh, this topic that we are discussing now is quite sensitive, because human courts are also affected here and look how alexander grigoryevich uh , holy day suggested uh, but also very uh, so ambiguous in terms of what we have in place laws that are necessary? yes, this is clear. yes? yes, no one will, yes, and i wanted to just indicate this message that we now have a law. we must all live according to the laws. therefore, if you have entered the law, then you must, of course , answer for this, but this is the measure of responsibility. it is also determined

by law, so there should not be any speculation on human destinies. here it is necessary to act within within the framework literally laws. naturally. we understand that there may be willows, as their citizens are abandoned, even here for a specific purpose, but we even opened with you without a visa. we have without visas and we have. e even for these citizens who are not citizens. in belarus , foreign citizens in our service make sure that some people do not come there, therefore, well, this work is a difficult job. you are not in vain. here there schwab we have drawn there is another interesting topic. another topic that, well, you should probably pay attention to the dovodsky forum has opened. but before talking about this next coven of globalists. i suggest you look at the talking video, which, in general, is not about beauty, but definitely about the global appetite and the miss universe contest. well, first of all, i was surprised that it was not ukraine that won, the united states, but here

look at the american. here is the feeling that the clan came up with her outfit, and here is such a gait of a tin woodcutter. she now brings out the image of america armed - these are teeth. it is the most important thing. you see, there is ambition in your things the whole planet earth well, there’s no beauty at all, it doesn’t smell here, the girl, for sure, is pretty to her there are no questions, but it was painful to look at her when she, probably, like today’s america, is such a fool and a weight, probably, of the earth the ball is now the weights for the united states what is the purchase? which one goes is a beautiful woman leaving, yes, and then trying to portray uh democracy in all likelihood. as i understand it, it was somewhere in my thoughts that it was ideological- ideological hmm, so to speak. uh, futuristic thoughts of those who came up with this you understand the time when america carried the

globe on her shoulders ended, yes, and today this is a grotesque, a certain grotesque that is shown to the whole world, but, pay attention, this competition looks at and evaluates those messages that this girl carries on her fragile shoulders. notice, that is, she won this competition. this is a competition that is simply a show and the winners can be anyone. in this case, it is the person who is yes today, the person who and the country that trying to remain the world hegemot. usually won, which is unusually most often venezuela there by girls. i literally want to bring one more phrase, you know, and again i want to return. this grotesque is a certain

demonstration of one’s capabilities and how one would like to see the further development of the world situation, just to invite you to speak shvamba when there was such a pretty girl, but in general the forum was also indicative , yes, well, most importantly, yes. they say that the most important thing is that an unprecedented number of businessmen came this time, but from e world leaders. well, sholtsev, although it ’s already a stretch to call him a world leader , there was no biden, there was no russia and china, but they still bent their line, they talked about a fragmented world, a fragmented world. and about how you need to maneuver in this world, mm, it’s worth looking at these speeds today, by the way, the forum contributed a lot to the fact that the world was fragmented, these are the scenarios that were discussed there. uh, tallinn, the strategy that she developed and led to the global crisis that we see on the one hand, the desire to bring the problems of

american leadership, because it is called under the rug. they have been brewing for a long time to listen if the entire world economic crisis. as a matter of fact, it started in the united states of america already 15 years ago. they tried, uh, to transfer this burden to other countries when they got away from their problems, and pushing others to the fore, but who now remembers the environmental agenda, and how many copies were broken at this davos forum, when philosophers obviously wrote about it in parallel sociologists, including western ones, other problems were brewing, and the dovodsky forum is also grotesque. you didn’t get bogged down in vain. this is the show and the forum is the same show. it's the same show when this forum is on the same. uh, like cement legs trying to pull something out, and no longer intellectually or strategically, he is simply not capable of it, if you look before. yes, these are businessmen. they come to

dovodsky. forum sought to get. now he, too, is turning into a symbol. here is that departing world that is being destroyed well, therefore, we will definitely continue this conversation with the answer, which comes from another part of the world, in which there is a much larger population, as well. minister of india on fashion render quoting developing countries of the global south of asia africa latin america will become the driving force of the economy in the 21st century. unlike developed countries, whose growth has slowed down, the voice of the global south must set its own tone together. we must break out of the vicious circle of dependency on systems and circumstances not created by us. and then another quote from sitting, china is ready move towards rapprochement with russia for the sake of fairer global governance. that's the point. by the way, speaking from india , there were a sufficient number of billionaires, in my opinion, sixteen. so they can afford to take part there too. yes? well

, let's do it, uh, we must admit today that the americans managed to take a certain step in order to keep their hegemony for some more period. yes, he provoked here in europe quite serious regional conflict and drawing in more and more. the european union, but in order to destroy its economy with its own sanctions imposed by the european union, to bring production to north america, therefore, for some period, they will still maintain their hegemony, thanks to this, including acting on the principle of divide and rule. taking advantage of the fact that china is very strongly tied to the market of the united states of america a number of other aspects. but this does not mean that other countries will sit, so to speak, and watch. eh, this one, as you say, a performance or a grotesque, of course. china , realizing that it is tied up, nevertheless understands that it is playing its own role in the

world economy, being. uh, the second economy in the world to determine, uh, its own development strategy, including using what the region is today. here in asia, the eurasian region is gaining such power, and i think that, indeed, with the movement of the russian federation, the ranks of other states, uh, maybe, ah create a precedent for, uh, let's say a bipolar or multipolar world. this work will be very serious and will be opposed to this work. uh, serious work. not even collective, i would say the west, but latent transnational groups that today are engaged in changing the civilizational development of our planet, the main question for us now is how we can get into this all for centuries, there were already such historical moments when it meant the crusades, that is changed violently a changed into socio-political

formations. now all of these things are happening the same way. as they say, many people think conspiracy theories or conspiracy theories no matter what we say, but there are latent ones for transnational groups that have certain interests. and in this regard will change financially financially. the economic system is a system of payments, and the growth of the world's population and reduction, well, the population of the planet control over the distribution of resources and stuff, what is less and less popular with guys like india and china although it cannot be said that they are not built into the global system. that is why they are not interested in strong national states, because, as it were, how can we integrate into this new architecture, which is now being formed sergey anatolyevich well, firstly, we often talk now about the formation of the creation of new centers of power. i think these are the quotes. yes, and xingping fashion shows that not only new centers of power are being formed, but new centers of development. and

the republic of belarus uh, thanks to the strategic thinking of the head of state already in some of these development centers. she 's built in. i mean, of course, first of all, he has our strategic cooperation with china, the people's republic of china, we are from india, we are developing our relations very progressively. that is, uh, even more than 20 years ago, alexander grigoryevich lukashenko spoke very clearly about the prospects for china, and, as always, he turned out to be right, and uh, today it is one of the most priority promising and strategic partners. republic of belarus and, of course, we are strengthening our alliance with the russian federation in all difficulties. yes, under all, uh, circumstances of this conflict. uh, with ukraine it 's still the biggest power in the world. this is one

of the richest countries in the world and the republic of belarus e. now it is very actively developing economic integration with the russian federation, which, both now and in the future, will ensure both the pace of socio-economic development of our country and the level of well-being of our people, therefore, in my opinion , the leadership of our country has taken many years ago, very correct strategic decisions, and we are already built into these centers, new centers of development. remember next. so this is our year of peace and creation. this is not only a village inside the state, but also some such signal for the alphabet. morse there is a lighthouse that is our value, who is with us we are ready to integrate into this new world that separates. these basic concepts can be considered unconditionally. i agree here that the uniqueness of the belarusian situation lies in the fact that

we made this choice a long time ago and outlined these parameters and the fact that the strategic partner of russia and then china but this is the interaction with different countries, and we do not need to change anything. we just want our position to be heard, and over the past twenty years, belarus has been making peacekeeping statements. let's just remember, because it's not just a year of measures and creation out of nowhere. uh, the fact that we ourselves have withdrawn nuclear weapons on our territory alexander lukashenko came up with the initiative to create a non-nuclear weapon in zones in we offered a platform for the negotiations of the emino agreements to central-eastern europe, and at that time they were all assessed positively. they, as they are now retroactively trying to bring the shadow to weaving, then stopped a full-scale war. and then we proposed launching the process of settling security in europe through the so-called helsinki two mechanism. now , if all this had been heard and carried out

, there would simply have been no conflict in ukraine that we are observing, and certainly. uh, the call to alexander lukashenko is addressed and externally, the belarusian thus confirms his role. well, i forgot a little. this is the term given combat. only. well, nevertheless, a donor of peace and stability. we do not change our values. we say, yes, we belong to the east slavic civilization, and ukraine also belongs to the fact that they tried to wrest it out. this is also one of the reasons for the conflict. we want to develop relations with all countries, but we see that no one will replace our fraternal russia. we disconnected the significance of china in time, the ladies are somewhat distrustful of the position of the united states because that they are trying to impose their hegemony. we are open to cooperation with the european union and with every european country, but sovereign independent, and not the one that is under the overseas protectorate. this has been our position for many years. you haven't spoken yet. therefore, i would now continue and

if the first part of the world will already say enough. as for creation, just today, probably, ero creation is coming and it is complete. and for our state over the past 3 years, let's take 3 years, when the pandemic began and when fighting began on the territory of ukraine we really showed the whole world that a small state is capable of defending its national interests. this is the first thing we did the second moment. we have shown our ability to be. eh, let's say the sequence of your e position. again, we don't change it. we have chosen our course. we go, according to this course. third. we have shown our readiness to support the allies. remember the twenty-second year and the events in kazakhstan, the events that we did and showed it and most importantly, we showed

what we can create. samples of equipment innovative industrial industrial, so to speak, all kinds of objects. we are capable of creating software. we are able to create new ideas. and it is precisely this development and creation that is included in our current strategy. well, perhaps the culmination of all this. i would say that today belarus acts as a certain spiritual center, a center of gravity, among other things. uh, orthodoxy, together with russia, of course, but he is our deepest values, they are acceptable for not only our so let's say, the orthodox world. they are acceptable to the world. they are accepted by other countries. and possibly in the future. this is the bond that will allow.