by their appearance on the site, they are able to put on a show. what city is called eternal rome rome rome is rome giving? are you sure the answers are sometimes a big test for our members.

belarusian winter all its little things and all the details. some are so beautiful they are breathtaking. some are awkward but together they are one. together, not harmony looking at them you feel aesthetic pleasure. do you feel that belarus is closer?

alexey good evening good evening passed all the new year holidays at the end of january the most time to discuss how we will live in 2023 , without pink ponies without expectations, miracle and magic yet real life. this year in belarus has been declared the year of peace and creation, but this is our choice. yes, and this is our way. here is our view of what can prevent us from the outside from implementing these plans about external threats. we talked more than once throughout not superfluous. remind yes, yes, for probably the last two years. we clearly described our enemy, our opponents, the entire

collective west that opposed us, explained why they were against us, but drove sanctions. why did political opposition groups gather on the territory of poland in the baltic countries, why did various destructive armed formations gather, but what can really prevent us from achieving our goals from external forces? this is, of course, a situation where we will not be able to predict their actions. and we see that our special services. ah, the intelligence agencies. we act as quickly as possible, and we know that at the end of the twenty-second year, the president. uh, had an open meeting on those plans which our uh opponents had. from western intelligence services, including the capture of some regional centers on the territory of the

republic of belarus with some kind of input. and the support forces of the nato countries, all this, uh, took place . i think that they have not given up on these plans, er, and in the 20th and third year, they , understanding how we work effectively, will try to predict. mikh in order to develop some kind of strategy to develop such a plan, which for us will be something unexpected. that is, you think that so far there is only no strategy. and i think now they are rebuilding very intensively because they are afraid of losing. well, it’s logical for them to lose - it’s definitely the bankruptcy of their large bank corporations, distrust of them as a key force, and on planet earth, therefore, of course, we must understand that now they will attract a maximum of experts from different regions of the most remote cells of buried

factories thoughts in order for them to think how openly, but we definitely have more than once already within the framework of the sites. e on television media. uh, belarus explained explained and the president i have said this more than once, that the most important thing is the threat. it's within us. and if hmm we do n't unite we don't understand ourselves. what threat we are fighting, and most importantly, we will not understand. what future will they draw, and the future is very simple for us, there will be no sovereign state, there will be no independence , the country can plunge into a state of eternal permanent either a change of power revolution or a permanent civil war. well, it doesn't thicken. no, well, you know, we do not condense, because they are these plans. i mean, western think tanks are discussing very intensely and openly. the most important thing is not to be afraid. uh, i agree to promote it, looking

at ukraine in principle. everything is possible. judging by how this situation arises, you know about the sanctions. we remembered the first thought that came to us about sanctions. just a few days ago, another row was once again planted with the help of fighters in greece, you know, when i hear this news, that is, the situation is absolutely similar information. kombe laid. yes , everything is as we had, only we still have the sky is closed due to sanctions in the absence of an investigation result. and they take it all in. as a matter of course? i would be there. you probably know, sometimes you do n’t want to be a laughingstock, which, in the place of the head of icao, he looks like a laughingstock when this happens again. and he is still working, that is, he somehow did not write a statement. well, on tuesday, our president held. in my opinion, the most important meeting on the socio-political situation in the country and around it, and that's just the topic, yes, which today we are discussing he made a lot of important and strong statements. each

of them requires special consideration. and, perhaps, let's try to discuss. yes, at least some of them. let's go in order. now, if we had not exhibited in the twentieth year, it would have been worse than in ukraine. it's bad that we have such a situation around the country, especially with ours. well, this is the length of the lesson for all 10 million and the guests that we have here. everyone has already understood this lesson for us, if we had not survived in the twentieth year, we know that it would be worse than in ukraine ukraine is richer richer. we would be here already. i don’t want to be bowed to you for this and thanked us, but everyone understands. in the name of what and thanks to whom we survived. here, how did you understand it? one must definitely understand that those forces that would have come to power in the event of a victory were the velvet revolution of the

twentieth year. they would be, first of all, war-oriented, enmity with the russian federation, suppression of dissent on the territory of the republic of belarus here are various advisers in the form of staff members. e western intelligence services that would consider us e as e, they are now doing on the territory of ukraine, that is, for them the value in the life of a citizen of ukraine does not mean anything, they can lower any number of people into the expense of any person in the same way the situation would develop on the territory we would not manage to break off economic relations with russia for belarus. it would be too soft. well, that is, in any case, they would try to make of us anti-russia. in any case, in any case, alex is well another statement. yes, it was about the need to unite. c to rally so that rockets do not fly and bombs do not fall. yes , to belarus. these are also the lessons of the twentieth

, uh, knowledge of the president. uh, the president’s good knowledge of history, and we know of modern europe, how the west, uh, through the technologies of dividing society, led to the fact that civil wars of confrontation and subspecies began within a particular country. uh, the protection of democratic forces was introduced. uh, some kind of nato peacekeeping force, uh, it would be anyway. i'm sure that's why the president just shows that in the event of a negative scenario after the twentieth year. and definitely here there would be, uh, a very intense war, fighting, and. we would once again. russia would have turned into a theater of military operations and, uh, the solution of some issues, uh, the

powerful of this world, but it was thanks to the strong will of the president in those days that he was able to, uh, change history and pay attention. how many publications after that were they, perhaps they were not so public, but along with the topic was the phenomenon of belarus why the technologies of the velvet revolution failed in the twentieth year, because they were completely sure. remember how confident you were. let's call all those not even political opponents, but simply political puppet managers who were taken in order to carry out this velvet revolution. they were extremely confident of victory. they were programmed like that, they were inspired like that, but just very operational very fast. uh, the response is president. yes, these challenges are actually from the ambassador of belarus from uh war from bloodshed, and now we can calmly not

discuss these topics exclusively. you know, like the experts, or the scientific community, but we must understand. you know what it could bring me that was negative for belarus, you know, these are the people who actually made these statements then. after all, they are now talking quite calmly about the fact that belarus needs to be bombed, that a war may start in belarus, that they will bring weapons here. you know, when i try to explain to people, elementary what is continuation. these are the words, after all, e are not rockets, not bombs. she doesn't know how to live in this house. uh, there 90% fuck. well, they will live there, let's say a few percent. yes, but she won't understand. so, when we talk about unity, we must take into account the fact that this will affect everyone, if god forbid we let this war on our territory once again affect everyone. well, all right, many of the president's theses

for the meeting. it’s just about the fugitives and concerned the possibility of their return . we don’t like the atonement and return mechanisms this person or group of people to punish is our way. we are state people. just like demanding to advance, so we must, based on state interests, retreat somewhere to take a step towards. if this is necessary, all the more so, i already said in the temple, we do not need to create any additional points of tension in our society. therefore, i instructed the administration with the participation of the public on this issue. work out to propose a mechanism for a possible solution; those who are ready to live in the world to create for the benefit of their country should not be rejected society is an axiom. i did not come up with this, and if we are wise people and the authorities have signs

of wisdom. it should be in this vein, and we need to act not to close ourselves off from those who stumbled and realized this, but to take a step towards, but only to those. who will return from places not so remote or from abroad and will be , as we will imagine, fuckers even bigger than those who surround us today. and there are. that's why, in your mind, the president has been three times already. this month, i considered it necessary to touch on. this is extremely disadvantageous for the leaders of the protests and the west of the west in general yes topic, well comradely if you look at the reaction of our opponents, it caused shock violent yes shock indignation criticism of the discussion. they started making harsh statements. don't believe, trust us. but this, of course, is already on the verge of absurdity, their statement look. but,

it is important to understand that in fact the president. uh, began to apply the same methods that were used by ah, western political technologists, that is, we do not act by force. we do not act aggressively, but we act, soft soft power, soft politics, and its essence lies in only one thing, if they are now aggressively, uh, trying to gather various, and political groups from uh, fugitives and from more radical ones, to collect some, and gangs or there destructive sabotage groups, otherwise they to what they lead to giving, good happiness, to these people, well, no, right? well, no, of course, they are trying to achieve their economic political goals with their hands, with their lives. what goals are those that were in the twentieth year, they have remained the main task. what if

economic, it is clear that the key economic is transit and the position of our republic. here is the baltic sea in the black sea. from west to east natural resources are clear, which are here and the geopolitical location is understandable, the one who controls e, belarus, he, in principle, controls this connection between europe between e, between west and east, modernly between europe and eurasianism, and the eurasian space. and this is a connection. most importantly, e does not let the votes fully establish control over europe hmm even so and therefore, when the president is talking about, uh, our citizens who, for one reason or another, were forced to leave. he appeals to common sense. why do you need? and for the sake of some foreign

goals of ideas to destroy your life come back and to your society and well, and we should, probably. openly speak to admit that the belarusian society is a kind of community. now, if you come back to the community, repent. e that this or that moment did something against the community, the community will accept you and help you. but if you're against the family, if you're against the idea, uh family, well, what kind of family member are you then, then you go to another family correctly, and who will determine this one and how it should be determined this approach are you a family member or are you an alien body that is trying to cling to you know these are the criteria, uh such normative not so difficult determine if you are for this 2 years, but realized within yourself

realized that in the west of the border countries in poland there are strange baltics. nobody needs it. you occupied a good position here, had a good salary, and there you came and do some kind of ancillary, uh work, then you will definitely strive to return to the territory of belarus, because here you have a and you have relatives here and uh, there u real estate. e at home, but the most important thing is the realization that you are a member of society here. you can develop and fulfill yourself , but there are those who have integrated into various political opposition groups, integrated into destructive power structures. and why did they integrate, because they are already ideologically

changed in their minds already.