hello greetings to all, we continue to record ongoing events in order to identify patterns in order to analyze how optimal our strategy is. well, to understand in what

direction the world is still moving. although this, of course, is not easy, but we have a very strong team today. i thank our guests for the fact that today they are waiting for peter petrovsky with us right now. he will join us. ah, and let's not waste time , let's start right away with the current belarusian delegation in africa and headed by the belarusian president, this is what is most important for yourself, what is the main message you caught for yourself, dmitry evgenievich, what did you pay attention to? firstly, there is always such a feeling, and the attitude of european countries to the continent of africa as to some other. yes , we constantly call the third country, but for some reason, but we forget that these are people who are very, uh, striving for progress, because well, excuse me, if not the whole periodic table yes, but people who work on the earth people who work for themselves this one, uh, here. this trip led by the

president of the republic of belarus is not only at the highest level, uh, the solution of contracts, because more than 20 contracts were concluded, but this is actually a breakthrough in our science, our technology of medicine education. you look how much energy. how many ministers were in this delegation a breakthrough not only, uh, to this country? in general , it is surprising to the african continent that even this atmosphere of negotiations. look i don't know what alexander is doing with them grigoryevich but these leaders in different parts of china, india, and now they pass in zimbabwe a day. they communicate and we hear. e. the first person in zimbabwe calls the brother of the belarusian president. that is, these are different cultures on different continents, but somehow it happens very quickly. here is the zimbab president himself. he said there is some kind of chemistry between them, because our president does not flirt with anyone, does not make empty promises, and he speaks,

as it is. uh, you know, probably, there is not such a large number of politicians. yes who can tell the truth, that is the point , of course, of course, and the president speaks. he says that if you follow the lead, this is what will happen to you. here's what happens. now where there are wars. yes, he openly talks about it, in general, when we say africa, we understand that today's peculiarity is the place where geopolitical interests converge. the most diverse countries. here are our interests there, where, as you can see, this trip, what you paid attention to in the first place. well, the president once said that we have no geopolitical ambitions. we have geopolitical interests, if we are talking about certain global geopolitical interests. they coincide with the goals of the civilizational camp that we have chosen, we are a military-political ally of the russian federation, we are striving to join the shanghai cooperation organization , using the definition of our chinese

colleagues, all weather strategic friendship with the people's republic of china. here, proceeding from this e we proceed in a global context. here we are in favor of a multipolar world on the other hand, our local interests presuppose progress. e, means belarusian exports to various countries of the world. we export more than 60% of the products that we produce for us. this is just a life survival strategy for the republic of belarus and in this regard, of course, having the russian market, nevertheless, we strive to diversify supplies and maintain trade relations with a large number of states in the world more than 180 states have trade contacts with republic of belarus and africa, our strategy is again to offer projects of mutually beneficial cooperation. when we develop and we are here we are realizing our tasks to promote exports. and our partners receive the necessary equipment and technology. i want to say that, for example, the minsk tractor plant delivered e.

in zimbabwe, too, uh, that means, uh, about 1800. uh, units, equipment and last year. uh, so zimba would be completely self-sufficient for the first time in the last 50 years of its sovereign history it is obvious that there is also the contribution of the republic of belarus here, and our country is a key partner for zimba in the implementation of a rather ambitious national program. zatsik agriculture, yes, as you rightly said, africa is not only, of course, the problems of poverty or there, er, various local armed conflicts, which, by the way, are largely stimulated by external players who want to fish in this troubled water. it is also the fast-growing markets of the fast-growing economies of many countries over the past 15 years, uh. here in the list fastest growing economies constantly featured african countries. in this regard, gradually stabilizes its economic situation.

there some time ago. difficulties were observed, naturally they are of interest to us. well, we help this country to extract minerals. we've been working with them for quite some time now. we are in this sense here is the visit of the president. it's kind of like this. here. uh, a good result, the crown of long-term cooperation is that viktor vladimirovich started his projects. i wanted more here, what to add on about your remark about the fact that the leaders are different states. lukashenka knows how to build relationships with strong subjective leaders who are masters in the good sense of the word in their country, which is guided by the primacy of national interests with such politicians, regardless of religious races and ideological differences. we find a common language. so it would be suga chavez so we have the president zimbab with erdogan with the president of russia putin with the chinese leader xi jinping with people who and

are responsible for their own words. they expect the same from their partners, which is why lukashenka is here. in this case, he really found a friend for himself and his brother nanga is known in the american on the american continent, he also has a nickname corresponding to a crocodile in political circles. that is, this is a principled man, a veteran of the colonial movement. here, of course, are the messages of the belarusian president, both political and proposals in the field of evil cooperation. what did they find understanding there, and what is the president of africa for us the day before, answering questions journalists on this topic? and he spoke very clearly. let's listen without africa there can be no prospects in the world. in general, here are the resources. there are people here. every year people here are becoming more and more educated, the latest technologies are coming here, the world cannot develop without africa. therefore, we are our friends here. we came to friends, wherever you

were in africa, uh, in whatever country you were? whoever i date, they are our friends. we negotiate with them in the name of our peoples. we have never agreed, we do not agree together against third countries on my friend's initiative. we discussed issues of cooperation yesterday. e zimba of belarus and mozambique mozam. the largest country with a coastline of 1,000 km, an agrarian country requires huge investments in agriculture. we already have experience and the president says, this is my friend the president of mozambique and we will soon discuss how our experience of zimbaba, belarus can be transferred to mozambique. we go in peace. we are not going the way the colonial-colonialists once went, the way they captured and exploited the people. we

bring here technology and this technology we train people here. well, here is an absolutely extremely clear substantive look at what is happening on a partner who is now called the belarusian president's brother. this suggests that, in principle, we can plan long-term. uh, interaction on this region. pyotr petrovsky has joined us , but for now, let's give you the opportunity to take a breath alexander ivanovich but we, one way or another, are now leaving around this topic. we see what the president said about it. but they forgot the africans, they forgave these centuries of apartheid genocide, what is there the belgians of the congo did what france did there in algeria in liv. well, the british, of course. right now, when they are lining up on this huge and we understand perfectly the very diverse african continent of external contact. they take into account what has been decades and centuries, in principle,

continues one way or another. now we see that the african continent in many of its areas is turning into a testing ground for medicines, and the social structures of these tribes do not just appear here. how do you see it? today we will say so colonialism, then rather, these genes are at the gene level of africans at the gene level. name me a country in africa that was not a colony, well, conditionally, only south africa can be called well, that's all. everything, the rest, everything was colonies, and today, when there is even a mass exodus, let's say, uh , the collective west from africa, we are also seeing this in the pursuit of burkina-sosa in other countries. here, uh, in general, the nation- states that they have already created trying. uh, let's just say to push out the bases, including basically a lot of french military bases. here it is at this level.

naturally, this will happen. but the fact that they remember it and know it, of course, it will be for many generations. it is already inscribed in their history. history, otherwise you won’t go there, but today is day yes, in general , it turns out such a picture that, if in general the world economy, so to speak, there will be recession issues, very well with the main ones, then the development of the world economy will just go only today only at the expense of african countries. but no, they want to develop, and they play a big role in this today. and russia is china even today. i hope belarus is even. there he will stand on his feet and will deal with this issue. only one always remains. what will they pay for? well then, let's remember the old picture of barter. well, in general, they have something to pay for. they have they have resources and these resources, including rarely

land material. therefore, we need to have something at the expense of what, how and where to go and develop. we are talking about colonialism in africa , and he acquired, if he speaks so directly somewhere in the sixties and seventies of a new form, so-called neo-colonialism, the basis of which is not an equivalent exchange, that is, france what to do with its former colonies dragged them into some kind of currency unions , where france determines the entire monetary policy of these countries; moreover, france until recently dominated in terms of mining part of rare earth metals and not only rare earth metals. what we see from, uh, the visit of the president of belarus to zimbab, that the president of belarus offered the zimbab is an equivalent exchange. that is, we are

tractors for you. we give you the modernization of agriculture, and in return after the modernization of agriculture. you will provide yourself with food, including food for us. m-th agricultural goods at least, which we cannot produce under objective climatic conditions the second moment. we are you we provide electricity for mining equipment. you will provide us with the raw materials that we need, including for import substitution and in electronics as well, that is, we see a completely new philosophy of relations, where is the african partner. this is not, uh, an errand boy, when everything is sucked out of him as much as possible and nothing is given to him in return and then they ask. why such rich soils such a climate cannot provide food for african states. and this is

becoming a real partner africa - this is the second continent in the world there is one and a half billion population and, most importantly, a dynamic population. if europe and even already asia sags a little, the african continent shows quite good dynamics. e ukraine is turning into a colony now ukraine may not be turning into a classic african colony . it turns into a latin american quasi-state of the type when external management is critical and complete hmm complete dependence on technological technological currency, otherwise, uh, fetters the leadership and makes it virtually puppet. that's what we see here generally correctly. today these concepts of colonialism should be transferred to the existing agenda, for example, compared with ukraine, or, in principle, such a narrative is incorrect and should be abandoned. well, of course, at the level, probably, of official

diplomacy. e should choose an expression, as for the level, let's say, of expert publicists of politicians, then there is a lot of freedom for maneuver, allowing you to call a spade a spade, if the state provides itself with tax customs revenues only 25%, and 75% of the budget is formed by foreign loans, subsidies, subsidies, other forms of payments, if the armed forces are waging war exclusively on the basis of the supply of foreign weapons technology and they themselves declare that they are protecting the interests of the military-political bloc, which are not included. well, how is it, otherwise we can call it because they no longer talk about the fact that they protect the interests of ukraine in general in fact. if you look, uh, here's the current conflict in terms of the declared interests of the supporters. in fact, it is about

the war began after the west rejected russia's security guarantee proposal . , and some talk about hundreds of thousands of losses, here are the ukrainian armed forces of the ukrainian people. they are, well, simply. uh fell. uh. now she said that it would be nice to take ukraine into nato to the evil of russia now you understand, this decision will be made or not taken depending on the situation on the line of contact today . there is no need to accept ukraine into nato for the simple reason that this will force the west to use the so-called fifth article of the charter of the north atlantic alliance and enter into a direct military confrontation with the russian federation, their military-political thought is based on the postulate that one cannot be drawn into a

direct military channel of the german foreign ministry which will remind not just the girl is not just even wrote to some party. it is the head of the foreign ministry of the largest european power that declares nato is waging war against russia, which means very simply that de facto nato is waging war against russia, which means supplying ukraine with equipment and weapons and sending there so-called hybrid formations that have no formal relation to the armed forces of the countries of the north atlantic alliance but in fact consist of uh, former military personnel who are either terminated their contractual relationship. or they use the cover legend in order to mean to fight on the territory of ukraine, that is. e, ber god, in principle, called a spade a spade. that's what, yes, and the fifth article is not needed in a direct military confrontation. they don't get involved anymore. we know that

trade relations between russia and the countries of the north of the atlantic alliance are maintained, moreover, gas is pumped through the territory of ukraine and there are no military actions. so, here, uh, this segment of the energy, let's say, cooperation is not affected. here are not ukrainian radical nationalists, nazis and so on, so not infringe on the safety of this pipe. well, somehow in russia this topic is the same as colleagues. regarding the colony, they are, as it were, conveying what very many people are talking about and connected with ukraine, not in order to offend the already humiliated ukraine now, here is dmitry evgenievich and when we see these terrible photographs, we will not show them on principle , because what is needed here i saw when it was all over , leaving the battlefield for something, trying to hide that foreign mercenaries were fighting there with pipes of their hands and heads. but this is savagery. this it looks like these tribal wars in africa, because you don’t have to think about these

colo. the stories that were there, but it's terrible. i think for the red cross this is also a headache for the global organization. what to do? from this, well, do not know the humanitarian situation, the humanitarian situation. there we have been talking for a long time about the fact that there is a humanitarian catastrophe there, but in fact, these uh, some separate ones, you can’t even call troops, because such a soldier will never do some sort of formation of absolutely incomprehensible people, uh , who do such things with their dead , it doesn't matter what they do with the prisoners. yes, it does not fit into any framework at all. and this, of course, goes beyond the understanding of humanity in general. and this should definitely be further investigated, what the russian federation is talking about now, because there should be respect. there is a convention, the usual normal swiss convention for the treatment of prisoners. yes, and what happens sometimes. it just goes beyond the understanding of the human. attention, in general, what about

tanks, as a military expert, i ask you many times again they talk about leopards about abrams, but on the other hand, we see that biden spent schultz. he promised he said, i'm abrams and the leopards, he went. and in the end, now the americans are strange, they say that it’s good, if we transfer abramets by the end of the year, and how significantly this can affect how it proceeds. uh, the operation in ukraine, she began a special operation time, the ukrainian armed forces were somewhere around 2.850 tanks on the move. that's because there is how much it has been repaired there was, but removed from storage is already further. e in the process of going these things to date. uh, it is believed that they have about 150 tanks left. but basically it’s a t-72b3 here and uh, or solid. this is what has been transferred, poland poland has transferred the tanks most of all, and

today we can say, so 200 of these 40,250 tanks, which will be handed over to the ukrainian armed forces. they won't change the situation. they will create difficulties. yes, this is a rather difficult target to hit and, let's say, of the order, somewhere 4-5 is needed they are points to hit one tank, this is a heavy tank t-72 - this is a medium tank, there are about 45-47. leopard sixty-two 63, well , depending on armament and armor, up to 60 m. that's quite, let's say, e complicated, and in electronic terms, they will be able to master weapons and training. well, he 'll need at least two to train here. months it will change here is the fundamental picture. i said no, well, the difficulties for the russian

armed forces will not create the question that if they are scattered, let's say, along the entire front line, they have nothing at all if they create some kind of tank armor fists. for the offensive, she, too, zaporozhye, as they want. that's it, it will be a rather complex value, a very interesting episode. now it has happened. we see that the united states recently said that they are ready to use any means to protect south korea, including nuclear weapons, and in this case we saw how offended the ukrainians were. what kind of ukraine no one promised to use nuclear weapons, or at least scare them somehow, and for south korea, which to enter everything, peter, why is this injustice is quoted in quotation marks south korea , together with israel, is allies of the united states of america in non-natu and therefore the united states has its own military base there and seeing certain hmm a certain

activity of the dprk and activity e, it should be recognized e, quite successful when dprk drones can fly over the palace e of the president of the republic of korea is the reason only in the dprk or is it still a release towards china uh, including from china because the dprk is an ally of the people's republic of china and the dprk never would not do such actions without consultation with china, moreover, this whole situation should be considered together with taiwan. china tells the united states of america that if pandora opens around taiwan, then pandora opens around south korea, because a peace truce of some sort between north korea and south korea is not signed, nor in an organized manner, so there are two cases that will begin to operate one together with the

other and the americans. making such statements. they say that they are allegedly ready to raise, certain, does not this mean that the front is thus gradually transferred there to the south asian region. i leave ukraine in the form in which it is now present not yet. in my opinion, at the same time, it is necessary to understand that, nevertheless, the main strategic adversary in the united states of america is not russia china, e, the russian federation is interpreted as yurin suret. that is, this is the current threat strategically, the adversary, the people's republic of china, the adversary, throwing a serious, economic challenge to american gigionism and much of what is now what is happening in europe should also be interpreted in the context of the confrontation between the united states and china, so the united states of america is striving to gain full political military economic control over the european union. it will be strengthened at the expense of its resources, which in the future, according to the plan of

american strategists, should allow them to make a technological breakthrough and defeat china in the competition in the field of the artificial intelligence economy. and so on. it is in this context that this war should be considered. naturally. in this regard. they will create tension in china and the direction of the korean exactly the direction of taiwan and that was the visit of the pilose. now we see that a new means head of the north american congress is planning to visit about the country of touch. yes, i'm a provocation. it is clear there that, on the domestic political front in china, this will also be played out with various kinds of american forces that are there. so, how to incite on the one hand. uh, leadership, china to some decisive action on the other hand to reproach the softness of the leader. we have already seen all this. well, this is important. here's something else that's not forget, the united states of america is the only power with experience in the use of nuclear weapons. it's not for testing purposes. that is, they used nuclear weapons against the civilian population of japan, and military

expedient with this demonstration. she seems doubtful. yes , militaristic japan was approaching its decline by this time. japan's defeat . it was only a matter of time. here, uh, quantity. it was the civilians who died, not the military. this is a huge tragedy in the history of mankind, which, by the way, is hushed up and american strategic documents allow the use of nuclear weapons repeatedly, the united states of america simulated various kinds of exercises where it was supposed to use nuclear weapons against the soviet union then against russia and by the way, uh, uh, about one of these exercises that was given during the years of the obama condensation wrote the north american press, among the targets that they intended to hit was the republic of belarus, and uh , uh, in general, the plan of the exercise assumed that russia was attacking the baltic countries, uh, states in response. this means that protective measures are used to inflict a nuclear defeat on russia. here

the republic of belarus does not participate in these offensive actions of russia. it's just, as it were, receiving nuclear strikes, as an ally of the russian federation, that is, you see, by and large. the only thing that means protection from this kind of aggressive aspirations is to strengthen their armed forces, returning to the issue of arms supplies to ukraine. china very clearly defines how it sees the situation. so, we are quoting the us energy thread, the largest initiator of the ukrainian crisis, if they really care about the ukrainian people, it is worth stopping the supply of weapons. here is the attitude to this issue. and in parallel, baidy began his election campaign the other day and said that if he had been president, the war would not have started this first. and secondly, even now he said that it is easy to achieve peace, it is easy. come on trump, listen to your weakness and incompetence joe biden has brought us to the brink of world war iii. we are

on the brink of a third world war. if anyone does not know, becoming president, i will bring peace through strength. peace through force, which has never happened before. if i were president, the war between russia and ukraine would not even now, despite the huge loss of life and the destruction of most of the country. i would make a peace deal within 24 hours right now we could make a peace deal. what is the best way to test your erudition and ingenuity correctly tricky questions to start at what age he as it seems to you, he could already be called a grandfather. i think that from 65. i probably just exhaled right now, and bogdan

as he thinks, but i read the new earth in the summary and, in my opinion, an option appeared there. b. if this is a wrong answer , grow up, please, otherwise my belarusian teacher will watch more. in total, the army of subscribers is already almost 500 million projects on our tv channel. what is important to focus on in order to move on? it's time to look back at the path traveled and build

an action plan for the near future as the mutually beneficial business develops, special attention is now being paid to the implementation of the bilateral agreement on indirect taxes bright news occasions in the political , economic and public life in the country and abroad it is a sin not to fall in love with belarus. a nation unlike none in its depth of soul empathy for other nations and careful preservation of the world, people of noble deeds and sincere deeds, the project is the main broadcast. watch for new releases on belarus 24 tv channel. peace through force yes, maybe we have seen it many times, for example, in the east and now we have seen repeatedly how peace was brought before by means of power. ah, to iraq, to ​​libya, to other countries that have now simply ceased to exist, so you know, honestly,

i don’t want to believe, i don’t want to believe a single word, because peace never brings peace through force, or if are brought, then in a slightly different way and not at all from this side, just not the person who wants to believe. while it's interesting that he's in this campaign, first, look at the statements that are being made. yes, this is also an indicator on the other sides. look at the second moment. he decided to stand up for traditional values ​​and made a similar statement. that's literally the day before. god created only two genders. and-and then trump promised to stop the racists and i quote the perverts who stretch their hands to the children. we are going to defeat the cult of gender ideology. after all, this says not so much about trump as about what, but he probably relies well on the study of the number of americans for whom both the situation with ukraine and the situation with gender experiments. there is no norm. but, firstly, uh, it really takes place like uh in the

west, they say what cultural wars are, but we must understand that some political technologists, the same american western ones, consider these inflated cultural will of the war to be targeted actions in order to move, uh, the electorate away from real pressing more than that, we shouldn't. eh, here's the value-based traditional values ​​rhetoric mixed with politics, let's not forget that anzhi duda also talks about traditional values. and thirdly, uh, basically, trump politics and biden politics, very it looks like trump wanted to put europe on his oil and gas needle dram, biden. it made the only difference that trump had a strategy. uh, such a sharp, sharp

fight with china is direct without any ukrainian case that he was not interested in, and biden plays a more complicated game with biden. behind him are a transnational company, primarily of a financial nature. and behind the trump are, first of all, raw materials industrialists , uh, for whom it is in many ways more profitable for them to just hit china, people shouldn’t build, that the republican will change. uh, democratic republicanism is sure to change the american economy american forms their foreign policy different two camps. uh, just ocher increases himself paints himself in different colors in values ​​in some strokes of geopolitics, but the strategy is one to consolidate. this is the greatness of, uh, the united states, which is not lost, that such a version and not a version cannot be overlooked here, perhaps even the main current scenario of the war in ukraine in the

sense that it is not ukraine that is needed here for something. ukraine is needed only for weakening europe, you know what processes are going on in europe, respectively, there is a sharp rise in the cost of resources for an industrialist it is no longer profitable to work in europe, many are already transferring a lot to the usa where energy resources are 3-4 times cheaper than you can imagine, and that’s when, in general, the americans will reach their goals and europe will weaken, she will not need ukraine. they will simply forget it, meanwhile ukraine does not refuse the diploma. their ways we remember last week the president, as if carefully, casually said that the ukrainians, the ukrainian side treats proposals for a non-aggression pact. and here we see what kind of resonance these words caused, because some people comment differently, see one thing, uh, in these words, others see something else. we see that the

poles were very frightened. they are not ready here building speech. the commonwealth writes that kiev is trying to establish a dialogue with minsk, ignoring the marginal opposition, and many experts agree that the west is trying to say through poland that not all provocations. the ukrainians are still exhausted. and it would be necessary to involve belarus in this conflict, so the factor of ukraine cannot be written off. what diplomatic negotiations pavlovich himself should be taken seriously. eh, the willingness of ukrainians to solve the problems of belarus through diplomatic means, there is no need to conclude some special bilateral facts. because we do not plan to attack anyone again, the constitution of the republic of belarus, adopted in its article 18, specifically states that our country does not wage an aggressive war with its territory, therefore, our neighbors have nothing to fear and it does not make sense to offer us certain solutions. so why ukrainian rhetoric has changed, firstly, you need to understand that ukraine is now, uh, asking for

an additional volume of weapons equipment, because it is planning a so-called counteroffensive in order to cut the land corridor from crimea, uh, to. e. donbass region in this regard. naturally, the presence of a certain russian military group on the territory of belarus, the regional group of the union state of the belarusian armed forces, performs the function of shackling some of the human resources of ukraine, which are already not abundant, since there are people take the armed forces forcibly. by the way, by the way, i'll say cynically, but i don't see it. uh, now, if we take the moral side of the issue, the human side, then, of course, this is very bad, terrible. now, if we take the issues of solving the military problem, then, in essence. eh, all methods. in this case they are justified. so ukraine is forced, resorting to forced mobilization. this is another mobilization wave. and in the same conditions, about 20,000 grouping. they are holding. so in the belarusian direction,

of course, they would like to receive some guarantees from our government. this does not mean at all that ukraine, uh, stopped its unfriendly policy towards belarus, that they gave us the arrested property worth about a billion, that they disbanded paramilitaries from belarusian extremists. there, according to our ministry of internal affairs, about 200 people are dined in some kind of terror battalions there. there, this kalinovsky is still there, some means a bow, the formation of this also does not occur. all of them undergo a combat training event their public speakers daily. they say that they plan to transfer the war to the territory of the republic, belarus, so we simply believe that this is another military trick, as it was, as it suddenly turned out, as a military trick. uh, the signing of the minsk agreements, which was later announced by merkel aland and ukrainian president poroshenko johnson, you understand this is some kind of specific culture. now it is political, when

it is customary to sign international treaties in advance, knowing that you are not going to comply with them, and then be proud of them a perfect act, he said that the normandy format was a screen, that is, he repeated the narratives of both merkel and aland and, well, poroshenko. it’s clear why they burn the last bridges so that diplomacy can work accurately anyway, sooner or later it will start working. and, but it will start working if, of course, military luck falls on the pike scales, everything will be decided. in my opinion, in the theater of operations. they are out there somewhere. as for belarus, it is quite clear that after the failure of the color revolution in 2020 after the failure of the sanctions policy against our country, because the task was to destroy the economy. means to cause here social upheavals hunger riots, the so-called and subsequently introduced. it means that their marians, who also did not happen, can be seen that belarus is economically holding on. yes , we have lost something in the economy there, but

next year, even according to their forecasts, a gradual recovery growth is predicted. we have found new partners. we have strengthened interaction with russia in general, but we have not succeeded. they piled up. here is a conspiracy against the president creation attempts. here, some completed partisan structures also failed. this is where it begins again. here is an old dance with a tambourine. and, of course, they hope that they will be able to inflict. e military defeat of russia is incomplete. yes, it is one that would cause serious unrest in russian society, destabilization processes, when russia would not be up to belarus and then, then they will take care of us and at the same time i ask you to notice us more the baltic states do not offer any facts about the non-attack, so i’m all this i think that this is, uh, another game with the aim of misleading the official minsk. well, as for peace initiatives, we are always open to them. i repeat our constitution our national day the whole character of our defense policy and foreign

policy. he says that belarus is not going to fight with anyone. we don't need to sign anything for a couple of minutes, we'll take a break. then we will continue our conversation. we continue our conversation. here. smoothly, approaching the fact that some conclusions to draw from what is happening is to outline the main points along which the formator is now, along which the world is moving forward, we are slightly scaling the conversation against the backdrop of the next coven of globalists. ah, for some reason, people remembered soros's article for the ninety-third year, and now i look in a variety of accounts and accounts and posts, they recall this article, mm, which belongs to the billionaire oligarch soros, the name for the new world order of the future nato, but it's interesting that which fits perfectly into the context of the events taking place. so what he writes there describes how eastern europeans can be used as labor force in future conflicts to reduce the number of deaths in western countries, according to soros.

the west will not tolerate losses in manpower, unlike the east and europe, and next to it there is still turner, the founder of the medical corporation cnn, who loves this idea very much. and once again he emphasized it for the sake of the common good, it is necessary to destroy two billion people, in general it must be said that for him. this is a thought. not a new ninety-sixth year of it lit up for the first time. he voiced this and now regularly returns to this topic. just recently in new york. take this speech, we need depopulation. i'm not talking about getting rid of anyone here reported, he was present at the meeting. i have five children myself, but one in four people in the world does not get enough food. and without access to good water, it is unreasonable to expect that we can continue to live like this, and there is too much material to finish with words. that's what dmitry evgenievich is it's just that people are already called material, yes,

or, uh, bags. yes? uh-huh that's how 40 put it, as many black bags as possible. yes, excuse me, as few black bags as possible from nato, yes, of course. uh, this policy is absolutely clear, and we see that since 2011. e after the twin towers. uh, america's hands were free to aggressively pursue its own politics on other continents and other countries, and uh, this is such a policy on the part of nato. they understand that we can test new weapons. we can dictate your terms. we can siphon resources. we can put our people at the head, and this or that government of this or that country, which is important to us at the moment, yes, without resorting to anything on our part. we lived as we live. we only win. we're giving back, uh, weapons. yes, why poland handed over their tanks

to everything, because, well, he has old tanks. they are now counting on leopold's new technique in the same way, because they supposedly bled themselves out. yes, it gives everything that is not need to. guys only fight, only fight, because no one counts in you. you are humus. you have worked out the material, even if you are still living and fighting, you have already worked out the material, and any country should understand this. belarus ukraine kazakhstan this is just material for nato if they need it in 2020. remember, he said that this is the territory. it's all gray, zone. that is, we singled out these territories separately to fight, because the war is not taking place on the territory. nato is not necessary territory, none of the nato countries. it goes on the middle side with the russian federation

. yeah, exactly. they also considered the republic of belarus if we had not received real support and protection from the russian federation, we would not have survived under it , we would have had the same thing here. i think we should also remember the theory of the so-called golden billion. she fits in very well. here in all these words, more specifically, the golden billion is 2 billion, but there is a theory that the golden billion is the usa canada and western central europe japan australia this is golden billion. which consumes 86% of all planetary resources 86%. but there is another verification - this is the theory of the golden billion. this is something that on our earth on our planet, let's say calmly, it can be fully provided for, only 1 billion can live, this is stupid, but the question immediately arises. where are the other six? yes? well, they are already doing the

calculations. well, they say, by the end of the year, even eight is already eight months old. here is the situation. what kind of arises and this theory of the golden billion is firmly entrenched in the political i will not do everything in order to support her, i absolutely agree with alexander sechansky, you understand, this is the theory of the golden billion. and in general, uh, it means that the perception of one's own civilization as some kind of messianic, this has always been the case, starting from the crusades, ending with the slave trade, which means that nazism is all not an invention. e africa latin america slavic peoples of the world by force they constantly carried a certain light. who means they taught to believe in god correctly, why did they expand? they created their own living space, which means the track

above the people and above the masters. now, then, they are explaining what democracy is to the rest of the people, and they are not the only ones. think back to the heads of european barrel diplomacy. imagined what does europe mean a blooming garden, then around the jungle they really see the world like that, do you understand? you see he has 5 children. uh-huh and he says it's wrong, but every fourth person in the world is starving, that is, it's not turner with his family eats a lot. uh-huh. you're all unnecessary people here, and it would be nice to get rid of you. that kind of thinking is klaus schwab see what they write. but it's simple. well , if they say so in plain language, these are racists, satanists, social darwinists, enemies of the human race, and you just need to tell them, fuck you to hell. here is a story from this opera or not, in one we will firstly see that the media have been distracted. now , to the indignation of muslims about the burning of the koran, this is absolutely unacceptable.

uh, such things are absolutely justified by this indignation, but we see what is happening on the territory of ukraine now mockery of orthodoxy. just recently, in one of the temples, putin was expelled, as they said, with a disco in costumes of the devils of the temples of the ukrainian orthodox church. let's see how this happened. yes, here we have it. here ah. or , for example, the blows that happened now all over the place, hit the pha-hamarson and the guards are from this whole opera, or these are absolutely some kind of different cases. here even deeper said. here alexandra pavlovich demonstrated an attempt to change human anthropology human nature. that is, to change the understanding of the family to change the understanding of value, but on the other hand, how does this tactic happen? yes, the protestant church has already been broken, see the female priesthood,

homosexuality and other things are trying to break the catholic church in rome from the inside. the structure of the orthodox church is quite complex, because 15 autocephalous churches, in order to change something, some dogmatics, it is necessary to organize some kind of all-orthodox cathedral. and you look, after all, the patriarchate of constantinople, which is still forties, how say many experts are subordinated in many respects to american foreign policy, trying to organize it all in an orthodox cathedral, but so far it has not worked, because the largest orthodox church, the most conservative one, is the russian orthodox church , all non-greek practically churches and plus one greek jerusalem patriarchate have gathered around it and they have a strategy now to recognize these schismatic autocephalous churches under their control. and through

these churches to advance the transformation, dogmatism of the introduction of homosexuality. e female priesthood. these are all rhetoric in orthodox and orthodox dogma, so what is happening in ukraine today is a hmm testing ground. including a religious step, such a next step will be the recognition of other autocephalous churches. uh, the split of orthodoxy is a collection of these modernists, and then what is the ultimate goal, and then subjugation to the ultimate goal, orthodoxy is quarreling with this ideology of harari so that it fits completely. here, in theory, and a golden billion in theory. uh, clearance a person to any technology, because that 's when we talked about the questions of the golden billion. here is the second question of admitting a person to certain digital technologies. the dictatorship of the genetic dictatorship, when

modern medical technology give the opportunity to those who have the means and money to change their genome to polish, as many say, and others. eh, here's the rest of the not golden billion to live. uh, like in a colony, like, uh, to some kind of slave class, uh, on the periphery of human society, then the main question arises in such a complex world, which is through the media through our colleagues. i don't know if my colleagues started me feeling that we perceive our own ethics and tasks differently. and i mean those who are on opposite sides of the information war, but all over this world. what is the way of the belarusian? that is, here we are to what from what we must go. we are the path of a sovereign state, regardless of the state, which, together with its allies, partners, opposed this unipolar

unjust world, where there is no equivalent exchange, where the division into higher and lower into those who have everything and those who have nothing we opposed this if the west is called the free world. yes , only free for the elect, then we must be a fair world for all . here for today. just purely geopolitically, even either we or they, and this will continue until we win, i can’t do it from the thought of that some part of our viewers. basically. i think that on youtube on the internet, but at this moment to think that we, as

propaganda, are laying down some kind of special narrative, which, as they usually say, divert attention from the fact that there are internal issues, and confuse it into conspiracy theories. right now, a quarrel was brought up on purpose. but how to overcome and whether it is necessary to overcome this nihilism, which is very often artificial absolutely yes, in order to create communication noise, and so that an important the idea did not reach the addressee dmitry evgenievich how do you know? we definitely need to react to this very clearly and very clearly and understandably . because, uh, naturally. uh, those messages in the form of soros. you see all the other comrades. uh, in quotation marks, they, uh, we see what it leads to and we must talk about it, and we must take a clear position correctly. here, uh, colleagues said that we were speaking. an ally of the russian federation we stood up for the truth, we are not shy and are not afraid

to say what is happening there and that we will never let's not cross over to the other side, because after passing e, all hardships. having passed the second world war, having passed the genocide of the belarusian people, yes, now start dancing. uh, ass in front of someone, how does? ukraine, well, in ukraine, so many people died during the second world war when the nazis simply destroyed and now you go out with these flags. well, what does it say? do you honestly understand? it would just be very sad for me to be born in this country, where my parents received nothing human decisions, being children during the second world war where my grandfathers died. where we familiar relatives were in the camps in the same way and went through such hardships and then

to see how these same descendants come around you and tell you how to do it. yes, never live let the belarusian in this world. what is a good question put really always there and we do not criticize. they have the right to such a point of view such an unbeliever thomas, yes, who is sitting somewhere at home on the couch. uh, so sucking lollipop says. what is he telling me here? so you are here for me. explain why the salary is not like switzerland why do i need all these shmoroses of yours and so on, well, first of all. what did we tell a lie, a quarrel with this did not speak. yes? find on the internet, yes, the second question. they do not have a directed influence on international relations and on individual sovereign countries, including our state. after all, there is another famous interview of the same quarrel, where he quite specifically says that yes, i

provoke political crises in different countries in order to make money on them he backlash business, well, right, that is, as he said. eh, classic yes, although it's not marx, it's marx who just borrowed this phrase. now, if it is a matter of two hundred percent of the profit, there is no such crime that capital will not commit, this must be understood. that's natural. eh, understanding the international context in which we are in no way distracts us from domestic problems, on the contrary, it allows us to look at these problems in a different way. here are some of these problems caused by objective external factors. well, let's say, that's why not switzerland salary country-centia is developing speaking about the fact that it is not entirely correct to compare switzerland and belarus yes, switzerland, which has not faced a military threat since the 19th century, and belarus, which, thank god, is after the end of the great patriotic war. yes, they directly survived the catastrophe of the collapse of the soviet union, which, in its consequences, was

probably no less painful than the great substantial war. just like that, right there. there were no such tragedies , but it was a life tragedy of individual people. how many died, how many i was born to imagine counting in our country in the ninety-seventh year, our state is boys, here you have an international consist, and now someone is thinking about sectoral sanctions. how much power it costs to sell, let's say potash fertilizer from belarus, which they blocked , blocked our access to the sea, blocked banking operations, our partners are threatened with sanctions, confiscation of assets. here their world is based on the correct supposedly. and of course, we will oppose the rules together with those states. they also adhere primacy on the right of the sovereign right of peoples to determine their future in a future multipolar world, of course, uh, any state model will have the right to life, if this state model is supported by the sovereign choice of society. here 's how they do some kind of universalist.

uh, universalist rules that get pretty arbitrarily interpreted by a drunk sheriff in washington who also swings his baton from right to left, so he doesn't know who's right? whoever is guilty, considering only himself, means the chosen messiah. that's how uh quoted by you anyway. well, that won't happen. this is the path to the belarusian, the sovereign path, so the path about the fourth year is led by president lukashenko for this. in fact, they are constantly trying to destroy it. see it doesn't work. this means that even a small country, if it has a sovereign will, has the right to exist, that is, only that revolution has the right to life. who can protect herself thank you thank you for being part of our program today. all thanks to our viewers for being and reflecting with us on everything today. in

different corners of the country, in places of traeda and feats, remember, ah vrm and the hero of the skin step yon maya sens and her on maya hook yana shackle the old truth and tell a scalding memory for a hook. i'm fed up with the urge to reveal special tricks. we, the guilty ones, rebuffed that history and rebuffed the energy of that place in belarus we educate

, first of all, involuntarily, we educate a full-fledged citizen of our society, how to maintain a balance between the state and each individual, we came to parliament there in order to defend the interests of their voters , the interests of the country. now, when you are betrayed, it's like that you are hit by hands, and you seem to forgive. you can, but there is no hug. in my opinion, the more control, the better and better the law. how can you not let go of the helm of fate, but through the complexity of the difficulty you try yourself in these situations. you become stronger. you already see things differently. this is probably the only thing for you and me that we must do to save our hearts once. and conscientiously mind your own business two i will always pray to you for every child in our country and in the countries of all, probably all countries of the world, let's talk about the values ​​of friendship, happiness, and plans for the future in the program , say, don't be silent. watch new episodes on

belarus 24 tv channel. hello , in this issue of the development of satellite cities , new social facilities will appear on the map. with hazardous chemicals, the fire has been raging for 24 hours.