one with a plus in the middle of the week, the republic will be under the influence of an area of ​​high atmospheric pressure, as a result of which precipitation will stop; at night, in the morning, light fog is expected and frost will remain on the roads; hours -5 + 2°. on friday, the front of the baltic will bring the wind will be cheese the car owner should be more careful on the roads in some areas will remain sleet. yes, minus 12 will be at night until the day before two plus. more information at my colleagues at 15:00. i say goodbye to you on this. all the best.

aleksey good evening good evening this year in belarus has been declared the year of peace and creation, but this is our choice. yes, this is our path. here is our view of what can prevent us from the outside from implementing these plans about external threats. we talked more than once throughout not superfluous. remind me yes, yes, for probably the last two years. we clearly described our enemy, our opponents, the entire collective west that opposed us explained, why, uh, sanctions were imposed against us. why did political opposition groups gather on the territory of poland in the baltic countries, why did

various destructive armed formations gather? but what can actually prevent us from achieving our goals from outside forces. this is, of course, a situation where we will not be able to predict their actions. and we see that our special services. hence her department. uh, it acts as quickly as possible. and we know that at the end of the twenty-second year, the president held an open meeting on those plans, which our opponents had from western intelligence services, including the capture of some regional centers on the territory of the republic of belarus with some input. and the support forces of the nato countries, all this e took place . i think they didn't abandon those plans, er, in 20e third year. they

, understanding how we work, work, will effectively try to predict on their own, they are afraid to lose. well, it’s logical for them to lose - it’s definitely the bankruptcy of their large bank corporations, distrust of them as a key force, and on planet earth therefore, of course, we must understand that now they will attract a maximum of experts from different regions of the most remote cells of deep thought factories in order for them to think, how to open us, but we have definitely been more than once already within the framework of the platforms. e on television media. eh, in belarus they explained and explained, and the president said more than once that the most important threat is inside us. what if, hmm, we don't unite ourselves. we don't understand ourselves. what threat we are fighting, and most importantly, we will not understand. what future will they paint, and the future very simple, we will not have a sovereign

state, there will be no independence , the country can plunge into a state of eternal permanent either a change of power revolution, or a permanent civil war. well, it doesn't thicken. no, you know, we don't thicken, because they are these plans. i mean , western thought factories will discuss. and it's very intense and open. the most important thing is not to be afraid. uh, i agree to promote it, looking at ukraine in principle, everything is possible. now, if we hadn’t exhibited in the twentieth year, it would have been worse than in ukraine, that’s how you understand this clearly, you need to understand that those forces that would come to power in the event of victory in the velvet revolution of the twentieth year. first of all, they would be war-oriented, enmity with the russian federation, suppression of dissent on the territory of the republic of belarus, and here are various

advisers in the form of staff members. e western intelligence services that would consider us e as e, they are now doing on the territory of ukraine, that is, for them the value in the life of a citizen of ukraine does not mean anything, they can put any person down. any number of people, exactly the same situation. it also took shape on the territory of belarus by breaking off economic relations with russia, we would not have managed. i think it would be too soft. well, that is, in any case, they would try to make anti-russia out of us. in any case, in any case, alex is well another statement. yes, it concerned the need to unite, to rally, so that rockets would not fly and bombs would not fall. yes, to belarus. these are also the lessons of the twentieth, this is, uh, knowledge by the president, and good knowledge of history by the president, and modern europe, we know how the west,

through the technologies of dividing society, led to the fact that civil wars of confrontation and under the guise began within a particular country, and some peacekeeping forces were introduced to protect democratic forces. nato it would be in any way. i'm sure that's why the president just shows that in the event of a negative scenario after the twentieth year. am uniquely here it would be uh, a very intense war of fighting, uh . we would once again belarus would have turned into a theater of military operations and, uh, the solution of some issues, uh, the powerful of this world, but it was thanks to the strong will of the president in those days that he was able to change history and pay attention. how many after

that was the publication of such they may not have been so public, but at the same time the phenomenon of belarus was considered why the technologies of the velvet revolution failed in the twentieth year, because they were completely sure. remember how sure all those are , let's call it conditionally not even political opponents, but simply political puppets managers who were taken in order to carry out this velvet revolution, they were extremely confident in their victory, they programmed them so they inspired them, but just very operational very fast. uh, the president's response to these challenges. uh, in fact, the way belarus from uh war is from bloodshed. and now we can calmly not discuss these topics exclusively. you know, like the experts, or the scientific community, but we must understand. uh what could it

really bring me negative to you know the people of belarus who actually made these statements then. after all, they are now talking quite calmly about the need to bomb, that belarus could start a war, that they will come here with weapons. you know, when i try to explain to people, it's elementary that there is a continuation of these words, right? so it's not a bomb. she doesn't know how to live in this house. eh, there are 90% of them to fuck, but let's say a few percent of bachista will live there too. yes, but she won't understand. that's when we talk about fusion. we have to take into account the fact that this will affect everyone, if god forbid we let this war on our territory once again, it will affect everyone. well, all right, many of the president's theses. it was just about the fugitives and concerned the possibilities of their return, the atonement of guilt and the mechanism of return. that is why, in your opinion, the president considered it necessary to touch upon. this is extremely disadvantageous for the leaders of the

protesters and the west of the west in general. yes, those, let's look at the reaction of our opponents, it caused a violent shock. yes shock. uh, resentment criticizing the discussion they began to make rather harsh statements. do not believe, believe us, but it is of course. already on the verge of absurdity. uh their statement look like. but, it is important to understand that in fact the president, e, began to apply the same methods that were used by western political technologists. that is, we don’t act by force, we don’t act aggressively, but we act, soft soft power, soft politics, and its essence lies in only one thing, if they aggressively, uh, are now trying to gather various, and political groups are from uh, runaways and more radical ones to collect some, but a bow

formations or are there destructive sabotage groups? and what they are leading to is to give, good happiness, to these people, well, no, right? well, no, of course, with their hands, with their lives, they are trying to achieve their economic political goals, which are the goals of those that were in the twentieth year, they remained the main task. and if the economic one, it is clear that the key economic one is transit and the position of our republic. here is the baltic sea in the black sea. from west to east, it is clear the natural fossil that is here and the geopolitical location is understandable, the one who controls, uh, belarus, he, in principle, controls this connection between europe, between uh, between europe and eurasianism, and

the eurasian space. and this is a connection. most importantly, e does not allow the votes to fully control europe. hmm, even so , and therefore, when the president speaks about, our citizens who, for one reason or another, were forced to leave. he appeals to common sense. why do you, but for the sake of some other people's goals, destroy your life, come back if you are for it 2 years, and realized. hmm, i realized inside myself that in the west, in the border countries of poland, the baltic countries . nobody needs you. you occupied here. uh, good positions had a good salary. and there you arrived and are engaged in some kind of ancillary, and then, uh, you will definitely

strive to return to the territory of belarus, because here you have a and you have relatives here and uh, there u real estate uh at home, but the most important thing is the realization that you are a member of society here. you can develop and fulfill yourself , but there is a way that integrated into various political opposition groups integrated into destructive power structures. and why did they integrate, because they are already ideologically changed in their minds already. geo- images, these images, they are all destructive, they are focused on coming and proving communication, uh, to prove to the belarusian society that they are better, that they were not recognized at some stage, and they are better. but this is, uh, what element, uh of uh, the biggest sins are vanity, uh, and number and pride. and that

's the worst thing, these people. they the most dangerous are ideological, and those charged with negative are destructive. e, ready. to destroy their loved ones, such people should stay there, why, uh, because time will pass and western society is also east european. there's more baltic countries out there, will try to get rid of them, because if they already have, uh, charge destruction, it's uh, not realized. and the territories of belarus were to be realized there , they will begin to smash shops there because of the poor life of the car dealership, and everything else. well , that is, an individual approach, that segmentation, which was designated by the attorney general. yes. uh, what was indicated by the resident, that a commission is needed, which will be dealt with individually in relation to each, is a reasonable approach. that is, he answers,

just to the premises that you are saying, well , of course, i understand that in practice it will be quite difficult to do so that not, as he says, punish me guilty, yes, and at the same time not forgive the one who really is the enemy of the country, then another question, like a forecast. here they leaked tikhonovskaya, but they left the world political arena while trump alant merkel runs johnson is handsome, yes, who is now trying to be photographed with such an interesting hat against the background. ah. these roosters are about the ninetieth year. here 's my forecast for 2023. you can name at least three more names of political names that will follow them, you know. i'll probably comment on the basic principle. why are they, uh, removed and this principle will work in the twenty-third and beyond

the basic principle, uh, and approach to analysis. uh, such rotations lies in the fact that these personal ones do not represent any political force and have no support within society and within the masses. remember how you removed it. johnson was just taken out. was it some sort of democratic election? there is practically no corporation there. yes, the big owners of banks have gathered. e hmm industrial enterprises and decided to hire this manager for this period of time. let him work, in fact, residents, chancellors, prime ministers. it's simple but pitiful nothing, but managers who are not significant, but who , if something happens, can suddenly turn up and change, therefore, we need to understand. the most important thing is who, and in europe, is not currently fulfilling the

task of corporations or banks. and who do we see? uh, definitely, we see, yes, there are, uh, some m-m contradictions between germany and the anglo-saxon world there are contradictions between hungary and europe yes, there are contradictions between uh the whole of europe, the anglo-saxon world and serbia yes, that is, uh , they understand that these personal ones they create resonance unhealthy resonance. uh, like nato structures, like structures of the european union, and in principle, uh, in the european governance regime, but this should not be, especially when the west is leading. uh, a very tight confrontation not only with russia, but in principle with the collective east plus china here. and, of course, uh, the front should be united, so, most likely, we will see in the near future. uh, attacks or certain technologies, including elements, but

protest technologies, and on the territory of uh, perhaps germany uh, perhaps uh we will see and uh about hungary in the balkans, but the danger of the anglo-saxon world or anglo-saxon political technologists, that is, british american ones, is that they often act within the framework of certain clichés and not completely hmm and deeply understand the interests of a european, not even a citizen, but a european owner business. yes, there are large business owners in europe, there are also owners of large corporations, there are owners of banks, companies and what we see, there the position of scholz in other european countries, large france italy is just an element when large european corporation owners come to these appointees to these managers

and say what you are doing. you live here, we pay taxes here, and you get money from these taxes, don't you? including, uh, bonuses will earn a fee, therefore, acting in the interests of not the united states of america, but acting in the interests of us, our companies. let's not think a little about how to please washington, but let's think about how to please us. and why? because if you do n't, tomorrow there will be protests and protests, this can result in the fact that guys will come and will start for everyone, and cut their heads, and they perfectly understand this. you are very beautifully democratic. i would even say expert diplomatically. here is how the situation would be described. let me ask direct questions and i want direct answers. so schultz will retire at 23. i think he will not be eliminated.

i think that vučić will leave, i will try to remove him, but orban will not be able to remove him, they will try, but they will not be able to remove him, because the support from the hungarian people really wanted to hear it i really wanted to hear exactly this, because it is a little contradictory, yes , macron's statements above, well, after all, millions of shares, and a macron is a person who, well, today, he woke up, he is on the side of the encas-saxons. woke up tomorrow, he is on the side of the european french business. i understand, yes, yes, so further biden, the situation that is now developing according to his drain through secret documents suggests that the corporation is tired of him, they will remove him, but there is still a change in england. i even can't remember his last name still so really. at a significant premier

, the same thing will not happen to him that the slime of rhinestones after 8 months. you know, great britain, i must say, in passing, an element of how the look is now draining or destroying the royal family. here it is no longer important about the prime minister, it is important how they discredit and devalue, but the status of the royal family. who does it does it. uh, the united states of america, which, in principle, are themselves representatives of the royal family, but with their help. yes, but you have to understand that this is enmity within the anglo-saxon world. it's like, uh, from the war between the united states. america great britain so the conference goes nowhere and it will be saved. uh, and so, uh, now it's important to have another prime minister appointed. for what purpose is he a native of e? from financial

circles before. uh, remember that previous even, uh, boris jones, what idea did they promote the idea of ​​a new british empire, uh, where the sun never sets, they said, let's bring production back to us. to the uk the same thing that trump literally said, there 6 years ago. yeah, and you have to understand that this is a group of owners, industrial enterprises, uh, or so -called experts, real economies, they lost the fiasco and were chosen. uh, there is a model that adhered to, uh, thatcher when she was guided by the fact that britain should develop at the expense of speculative capital, that is, stock exchanges, and the concentration of banks, but within itself, but the most important thing is that now they are not competing with the united

states of america they compete with the asia-pacific region plus the middle east, competition has intensified and therefore such a very difficult financial economic situation in the uk itself is good. these are the resignations that took place in zelensky’s apparatus, the high-profile resignations of a dozen people, a dozen high-ranking officials. some experts compare this with what you say, that a struggle has begun between american and british influence on zelensky. do you agree with this or not, i completely agree without argumentation, but it only needs spice. e it should be noted that resignations are not made by zelensky, but by personnel, but by employees of, uh, british or american intelligence services who sit there and say to remove this today. well, the director of the cia did not go by chance. e, talked, talked and the abandonment began. yes, therefore,

in reality, they are all these personal e, no matter what high positions they occupy there, they are nothing of themselves. so they were told, says the arrestovich, they said to speak. so he said, they said to shut up. here he was silent. now he says a few the opposite. well, okay, uh, here it is again, yes, let's get back to our borders closer, and not so long ago, on the central polish television, they showed a weather forecast with five western ones. ah, ukrainian regions, suddenly became polish. in fact , the whole lviv region, tam and so on are marked with one color. here, whether another redistribution threatens us this year, if not the world, it is at least the closest environment. yes, it should be noted that it was such a very good reaction test, a test of the reaction of removing the reaction from everyone, i mean from all the players and the united states america from britain from russia and from above,

including with ukraine, that is, it is clear that poland is playing its game. and that is not exactly the role. eh, someone, namely his provocative game is enough, but i think the appearance of this picture with these areas. this is not accidental, but they are clearly interested in hmm in case, but in some situation, and which will be favorable for them to hold this blisk, a and seize these territories, they openly say, i mean the poles uh- e in the open. e, in principle, discusses. uh, the domor regime has been over the past 20 years, so, of course , this does not pose a threat to the regime of holding its own on the territory of ukraine, it poses a threat to europe, primarily to germany, france, italy, because the expansion of poland and such a

flagrant action unambiguously change the balance of power in europe itself well, you boorish behavior of poland in relation to germany repeatedly. it's all from the same opera. this is a challenge is a challenge. uh to the fact that the first violin. uh in europe uh ready. and basically in case of support from the united states of america, it will play more, but the most important thing here is the aspect: will warsaw decide to carry out such an operation? well , you know, i just doubt it the least . i think the situation. here's my idea. i'm not an expert. i'm just an outside observer. yes, i am absolutely sure that warsaw will decide, it is just waiting for the moment, after all, for two decades in polish schools in belarus, the map of poland for some reason had borders near minsk and this, but they did not shy while working. we have here on

the territory. okay, what is not drawn. yes , there is already a global supply of weapons to ukraine with equipment. we 'll figure it out later. well, here's the keynote from last year. he boiled now yes, there are 22 countries left in the world. which have not yet been attacked by great britain yes, among them, belarus will it be possible to maintain a place in this twenty in the twenty-third year? you absolutely rightly said that britain always had plans to cut off russia from russia through poland through the baltic states through ukraine two seas from the baltic to the black sea and connect this space for themselves to make a very strong buffer zone between a technologically advanced germany and an energetically developed russia, this can be read in treatises of the end of the 19th century.

everything has been written about it. yes, with the uk’s attempts to create this buffer zone, will uh hmm belarus retain membership in this list, and the lists of countries, uh, which were not included in the uk will definitely retain the main, probably motive with the main reason or strength of us lies in the fact that we hmm thanks to our president, we understood very clearly. the strength of the integration processes, the strength of the integration formations in the post-soviet space, it is not in vain that the e-cis is here in minsk, it is not in vain that we intensively developed the theme of the union state and, most importantly , supported this theme of the e-union state, starting from the late nineties. remember how many of those liberal forces were in russia itself that tried to distort, uh, the idea of ​​a union state, to credit and only

thanks to the president, the idea of ​​a union state the state was preserved and then it was more than taken up by russia when , in fact, the russian federation at some stage was left alone without allies. only belarus acted as that reliable ally, which a. i supported the ideas and the third motive is that we very closely interacted economically financially with the asia-pacific region and the middle east, which gave us the opportunity, first of all, that they began to perceive us not as some kind of backward agrarian country, but to perceive sale as the industrial side a technological country, and most importantly, a country that can successfully do business with everyone, regardless of any sanctions, and threats of restrictions, and once you can do business with us. and most importantly, we fulfill our

obligations, and this is appreciated in difficult conditions. you know, i’m summing up what you said, i want to emphasize one idea that they began to really perceive it as an independent independent player in the political arena and no matter how strong they try to distort this idea . what exactly will teach 23 years even the layman is to understand military equipment. a very relevant topic and more tanks more weapons for ukraine bmp people are starting to understand the specifics. you have to give them their due, look here. challenger leopards are in themselves yes, heavy tanks yes? the same leclercs, yes, the french ones are not very adapted to the war on the black soil and ukraine

well, okay, there is another factor. e deplorable state of two-thirds of ukrainian bridges and bridge structures. yes, then a question. why send them to ukraine ukraine is a testing ground, and for testing a modern look the armament feature of these tanks is abrams leopards. uh, and all other nato countries in that they, uh, can be integrated into the system by a network of central combat control, and already starting in 2004, they began to modernize these abrams, and leopards, and integrate blocks into them that allowed, and you see the computer system that controls the battle. these tanks guide them and tell them where to shoot, where the threat is. moreover, the modernization provided, including the placement of certain even phones

external phones on the outside of these tanks. how do i know at one time, i just had to translate these articles from english from uh british magazines to american magazines that described, well, the order of modernization of these tanks. why is a telephone needed in order to be able to connect the infantryman with the crew, and if in the event of a failure of the communication system, or the central control network, what does this mean? and the west is trying to enter the territory of ukraine. this is my beautiful, they saw in the twenty-second year to apply modern combat control methods. this is the basis. now it's intelligence. it's a radio fight. yes, this is the suppression of various signals. this is the use of satellites. and some blocks are integrated, and they are trying to throw these abrams there in order to see how they

will work there 10 tanks 20 30 tanks, even if they burn them ah , they will understand there in 2 3 4 days . uh, whether this model is successful or unsuccessful, that is, how many ukrainians will die in this case, does not matter at all. it does not matter at all, because the engineer of these defense corporations will make their findings conclusions will sell. this is once again the pentagon the pentagon will request this money from the state budget. and that's why it's a business. nothing personal good. well , it may be unexpected then for the layman turn. yes, but as it is, japan for some reason they began to call it the new ukraine , many experts talk about it out loud. for the first time since world war ii, she is doubling military spending and tying it to the rapidly growing threat from china, given the size of the japanese economy. these plans could bring the country to third in military spending after the united states and

china, behold, should these awakened samurai be underestimated. yes, you noted correctly. this. uh, here is such a cliché about japan that it is a new ukraine in asia, uh, was given in the chinese edition of the global times, and from the position of what that japan can be used by the united states of america, and how quasil force in confrontation with china, that is, not taiwan conflict, well, the reason for the conflict, maybe taiwan or some island, but the americans themselves fight with their own, but with soldiers. want they want to fight with the hands of japanese, proven technology. and that's what the chinese are talking about. hmm, it is clear that the militarization of japan does not bring anything good in the region, but it is important to realize that , uh, the japanese are really far from

politics and hmm, and they don’t track much. eh, what their government is conditionally doing, but what the government says, they will do, but it is traditional for them and it is important here is the aspect e of understanding. like the japanese themselves, despite the fact that hiroshima nagasaki were related to the united states of america a. remember, uh, traditionally they gather every year, and pray to remember, but do not raise any political topics. who is to blame in this sense, they change they invite the american word to these events, but here a very important aspect is that e islands from each other the population of the islands and the attitude towards americans are completely different from each other in akinawa. we know there is an american base. so these are the atrocities that are being done by e, american soldiers in okinawa, it causes a strong protest. and

the people of okinawan. you don't have to be convinced that americans are evil, but no one hears them. uh-huh okay convinced watch 2023 and money. the united states again reached, well, the state long limit once again on january 19, it amounted to 31.4 trillion us dollars. yes, it's a lot or a little, well, if the total amount of american money in the world is about 644 trillion. well, it seems to be a little, it seems to be, yes, but given that this amount has grown 32 times in 40 years, and each time they raised this limit. well then, that's probably a lot. here , in order to avoid default, the ministry of finance is ready to accept extraordinary measures. although they seem to me very clear. yes, they will again refuse certain contributions to social funds. pension funds, as always, suffer from the american social sphere. here in your opinion,

where is the ceiling. financial yes, and how it will affect ordinary people. and most importantly, what will it lead to. yes, it is necessary to note here the most important aspect is that in 2012, and this debt exceeded the volume of gdp. that is, now it is 130% more than these 31.4 trillion, and the gdp of the united states of america, that is, even the real economy, even financial work. sector of the united states of america, even the work of the entire turnover complex, which amounts to 50% of the us gdp, does not compensate for the external debt. yeah, but the question arises, how to return? it is clear that this is ah, a model, yes, mmm can exist, uh, further only at the expense, well, it is clear further expansion. well, the question is who will buy these bonds, and they will only buy if

the regime of the federal reserve system will convert. the secluded states of america are no longer just, but in a certain element of e-hegemony, but in an element of hard terror in relation to all other countries. that is, it will be those strange ones that are dependent. come already demand that they buy this debt not by financial mechanisms, not by economic ones, but by the mechanisms of profitability and reliability, liquidity will be determined, and they will come to say you do not want to buy. your government doesn't want to buy our bonds or banks. well, you might not wake up tomorrow. well let's talk straight 2 years ago. this was harder to do. how now. they tied everyone to this military special operation so much. well, okay, but let's literally question it. yes , the eternal fear of any belarusian of all years. yes

, not only 23, that these american pieces of paper, they will turn into candy wrappers. that's how much this fear is justified now. hmm, and or we are still exaggerating a little with regard to the next few years, at least. well, you know, our task. e is not, here you and i are not to thicken, e, colors or engage in propaganda to speak? yes, quickly, let's go and head to the side bank to issue yours, and hard-earned dollars or there, converted belarusian rubles into dollars. no, we are extremely objective. and most likely, we will simply advise you to sit on the news feed and see what china is doing and what the countries of the near current are doing, they are doing everything unambiguously. they do everything in order to get rid of dollars in their calculations, but remember in december. uh, the president of the people's republic of china where did he go to the middle

east ? in fact, the dollar was from oil from a real resource and tied to the yuan, which russia did immediately after it untied oil. energy resources from the dollar. she tied the euro to her own, and not to currencies of her own free will. still, they were forced in many ways, including through banking restrictions. yes, but the question is why. these empty candy wrappers, as it were correctly said, they can exist, that is, have a real value, when they are for what. what is tied to the gold standard abandoned the seventies bratman woods system destroyed, then why because gold too little for a speculative financial model to develop, they began to tie e to oil and gas, as if there are much more of them than e, gold, but now in china and

in russia and the middle east there are good financiers and economists who perfectly understand financial and economic power of the united states of course. eh, and understands the weaknesses of this model and now we see, but very uh hmm, the growth of this weakness. well, let's still, honestly, let's say, yes, what about the weakening of the dollar and the increase in mutual settlements in other currencies and other state reserves currencies. this is the process today. uh, obviously the dollar is unlikely to be threatened, at least for the next few years. this is my deep. beliefs are absolutely right. yes, this is confirmed by figures; this is confirmed by the situation in the military today . it’s not that america somehow provided its energy needle, on which it planted europe and, plus , provided military orders for its enterprises for years ahead, thanks to the fact that all

other reserves have already been taken. well, if already objectively, well, okay, but the direction. to me like now about information security. it is impossible not to talk about this while the united states began to aggressively curb the technological development of china and russia and yes, in general, but also chinese tiktok in particular. on the contrary, we are now more and more ready and want rapprochement with russia in the information space. the plan for 23 years has been repeatedly voiced to create a single media holding. and not only the question is not simple. we personally have long been showing the political product of the russians here on our territory all the time. yes, but they also have something learn. the moon, including in terms of building information work. here's what you think are the hottest issues or gaps you need to address right now. yes, in order for this information space of the joint union state

to work in both directions and become real. yes, a very difficult topic, it is caused primarily by the fact that, m-m, the principles of work are a-a media component in belarus and a media component in russia over the past 30 years. they were completely different. and remember how the so-called independent about the media, uh, in the russian federation, their focus was changed only in fact after their own in 2022. and so, uh, everyone could a-a broadcast in completely different keys completely opposite and often the state agenda was obscured or moved to some other position thanks to the active work of private media platforms, which, uh, were financed, uh, and not

by government funds or by private uh, by corporations, and this caused some kind of unhealthy resonance in the minds of a simple, uh, russian layman, so, first of all, turn task is not for us for the belarusians. we know how to work. in the interests of the state, we know how to work in the interests of our people, the task for russians is to figure out for themselves where the interests of their russian people are, where the interests of the russian state are. uh-huh and where are the main well, let's call them not enemies, but those who resist those who resist. it's by inertia. there are many more. that's when they will have a clear understanding inside themselves of how they want hmm protect their information field from negative

influence, then we can very easily resolve issues within the framework of creating an allied holding, but everything would be fine if we had time, but we don’t have time. and the russian federation does not have time, the union state does not have time, therefore, there is only one way out, and take our model and distribute it as a derivative, uh, not only to moscow, moscow region, uh, st. petersburg, leningrad region, express, drop it all over the territory of the russian federation to distribute the content of our content. and our the messages are our meanings, because we have already clearly defined within the framework of the program, belarus a for e. the period since the creation of the union state has not moved one iota. the very idea of ​​a union state, and we did not

have liberal politicians, but technologists. we did n't have any uh, pro-western liberal media that could discredit this idea, so we have to take it. aggregate collect do images do. uh, similarity and use our model, just in the work of the union holding, you know, i'll be honest. i'm always i'm practicing and on my mind. that's how soon although the competitors, of course, i should not say, but as soon as belarus 24 and belarus one, as independent belarusian tv channels. eh, they will enter the cable networks of moscow, st. petersburg and central russia in general, we can say that the process has moved off the ground, as long as they are not allowed there and do not want to be allowed to. well, accordingly , we are talking about the fact that business prevails over the interests of the state ideology.