two for minsk residents is building 18 houses, five of them have already been settled in 2022, three more high-rise buildings are under construction. all housing, such as electric water supply and cooking in all apartments. the construction of two kindergartens will be ensured by the construction of two kindergartens only with the help of electricity for children, cozy safe playgrounds and educational institutions. one kindergarten is already under construction, which will be provided, and in the second quarter of this year. presumably may . uh, our school is under design, one given school. will construction also started in the second quarter of this year, a school for 1,020 students, playgrounds and parking spaces and races are being built separately from each other. uh, playgrounds are being built inside the courtyard, so that it would be convenient in general in the minsk region. a number of new social significant objects will appear in the near future. these are the kindergartens in borovlyany and logoysk, the school of the village, the new polyclinic. outer school. they will also start building in soligo. the ministry of communications will issue

an envelope with a stamp with the cultural capital of belarus in 2023 on it sights of the city slutsk belts and the cathedral of st. archangel michael a monument to anastasia slutskaya and gymnasium number one the oldest school in the country on the reverse side, background information and educational facts, thematic series updated annually since 2010 presents beats by mail and other printed novelties. cygnus, lyra and eagle are three constellation-themed stamps and the astronomy series is yet another premiere. in the series birds of belarus in circulation issued a stamp with the image of the common highlander in the spring philatelists will be pleased with stories dedicated to belarusian folk games. three silver and bronze medals in individual competitions and second place in the team tournament with such baggage, the freestyle national team of belarus is returning from krasnoyarsk, where the first stage of the new international tournament champions cup took place over two days. on the slope

of nikolaevka, adrenaline was running high and a sea of ​​emotions was raging behind the jumps of freestylers from the three countries of belarus, russia and kazakhstan , full stands of fans were attentively watching. already this week. our athletes will perform at the second stage of the champions cup in yaroslavl aleksey good evening good evening this year in

belarus has been declared the year of peace and creation, but this is our choice. yes, this is our path. here is our view of what can prevent us from the outside from implementing these plans about external threats. we've talked more than once over there remind yes, yes for probably the last two years. we clearly described our enemy, our opponents, the entire collective west that opposed us explained why , uh, sanctions were imposed against us. why were going political opposition groups on the territory of poland in the baltic countries. why did various destructive armed formations gather? but what can actually prevent us from achieving our goals from outside forces. this is, of course, a situation where we will not be able to predict their actions. and we see that our special services. the department, uh, is acting as quickly as

possible. and we know that at the end of the twenty- second year, the president held an open meeting on the plans that our opponents had with the western intelligence services, including including the capture of some regional centers on the territory of the republic of belarus with a certain input. and the support forces of the nato countries, all this e took place. i think they didn't give up on those plans, er, in 20. and the third year. they, understanding how we work, work, will effectively try to predict on their own, they are afraid to lose. well , it’s logical for them to lose - it’s definitely the bankruptcy of their large bank corporations, distrust of them as a key force, and on planet earth, therefore, of course, we understand that now they will attract

a maximum of experts from different regions of the most remote cells of the deepest factories of thoughts so that they think how to open us, but we have definitely been within the platforms more than once. e on television media. eh, in belarus they explained and explained, and the president said more than once that the most important threat is inside us. what if, hmm, we don't unite ourselves. we don't understand ourselves. what threat we are fighting, and most importantly, we will not understand. what kind of future will they draw, and the future is very simple for us, there will be no sovereign state will not be independence , the country can plunge into a state of eternal permanent or change of power revolution, or permanent civil war. well, it doesn't thicken. no, well, you know, we do not condense, because they are these plans. i mean discussing western thought factories. it is very

intense and open most important and not to be afraid. uh, i agree to promote it, looking at ukraine in principle, everything is possible. now, if we hadn’t survived in the twentieth year, it would have been worse than in ukraine, so, as you understand it, you definitely need to understand that those forces who would have come to power in the event of victory in the velvet revolution of the twentieth year. first of all, they would be war-oriented, enmity with the russian federation, suppression of dissent on the territory of the republic of belarus, and here various advisers in the form of career employees. e of the western intelligence services, which would consider us e as, e, they are now doing on the territory of ukraine, that is, for them the value in the life of a citizen of ukraine means nothing, they can lower any person into an expense. any number of people, exactly the same situation. it also took shape on the territory of

belarus, that is, we would not have managed with a purely rupture of economic relations with russia. i think it would be too soft. well , that is, in any case, they would try to make anti-russia out of us. in any case, in any case, alex is well another statement. yes, it concerned the need to unite, to rally, so that rockets would not fly and bombs would not fall. yes, to belarus. these are also the lessons of the twentieth, this is the knowledge of the president, and the president’s good knowledge of history, ah modern, and we know europe, like the west, uh, through those technologies, the division of society led to the fact that civil wars of confrontation and subspecies began within a particular country. uh, the protection of democratic forces was introduced. uh, some kind of peacekeeping force. nato it would be in any way. i'm sure that's why the president just shows that in the event of

a negative scenario after the twentieth year. and definitely here there would be, uh, a very intense war, fighting, and. we would once again turn belarus into a theater of military operations and, uh, the solution of some questions of the mighty of this world, but it was thanks to the strong will of the president in those days that he was able to change history and pay attention. how many after that was the publication of such they perhaps they were not so public, but at the same time the phenomenon of belarus was considered why the technologies of the velvet revolution failed in the twentieth year, because they were completely sure. remember how we were sure that all those, let's call it not even political opponents, but simply political puppets of managers who

were taken in order to carry out this velvet revolution, they were extremely confident in their victory so they programmed them so they inspired, but just very operational very fast. uh, the president's response to these challenges. e is actually the way belarus from uh war from bloodshed. and now we can calmly not discuss these topics exclusively. you know, like the experts, or the scientific community, but we must understand. uh , what could it really bring me negative for belarus, you know, these are the people who actually did then these statements. after all, they are now talking quite calmly about the need to bomb, that belarus could start a war, that they will come here with weapons. you know, when i try to explain to people, it's elementary that there is a continuation of these words, right? these are not bombs. she doesn't understand this house. he lives

, uh, 90% of them fuck them there, but let's say a few percent of the bachista will also live there. yes, but she won't understand. that's when we talk about rallying. we must take into account the fact that this will affect everyone, if not god we let this war on our territory once again it will affect everyone. well, all right, many of the president's theses. it was just about the fugitives and concerned the possibility of their return, the atonement of guilt and the mechanism of return. that is why, in your opinion, the president considered it necessary to touch upon. this is extremely unfavorable for the leaders of the protest and the west as a whole, and the fact that, if you look at the reaction of our opponents, it caused a violent shock. yes shock. uh, indignant criticism of the discussion they began to make, and harsh statements do not believe us. well, of course it is. already on the verge of absurdity. uh their statement look like.

but, it is important to understand that in fact the president, e, began to apply the same methods that were used by western political technologists. that is, we don’t act by force, we don’t act aggressively, but we act, soft soft power, soft politics, and its essence lies in only one thing, if they aggressively, uh, are now trying to gather various, and political groups are from uh, fugitives and more radical ones to collect some, and the bank of formation or there destructive sabotage groups? and then they lead to what in order to e give, good happiness, to these people, well, no, right? well, no, of course, with their hands, with their lives, they are trying to achieve their economic political goals, what goals of those that were in the twentieth year, they

remained the main task. and if the economic one, it is clear that the key economic one is transit and the position of our republic. here is the baltic sea in the black sea. from west to east it is clear natural resources that are here and the geopolitical location is clear, the one who controls e, belarus is the one, in principle, controls this connection between europe between e, between west and east, modern between europe and eurasianism, and the eurasian space. and this is a connection. most importantly, e does not allow the votes to fully control europe. hmm, even so, and therefore, when the president speaks about, our citizens who, for one reason or another, were forced to leave. he appeals to common

sense. why do you need? and for the sake of some other people's goals of ideas to destroy your life, come back if you are for it for 2 years, but you realized. hmm inside i realized that on west in the border countries of poland and the baltic countries . nobody needs you. you occupied here. uh, good positions had a good salary. and there you come and do some kind of ancillary work, then uh, you will definitely strive to return to the territory of belarus, because here you have a and you have relatives here and uh, there u real estate. e at home, but the most important thing is the realization that you are a member of society here. you can develop and fulfill yourself , but there is a way that has integrated into various

opposition groups integrated into destructive power structures. and why did they integrate, because they are already ideologically changed in their minds already. geo- images, these images, they are all destructive, they are focused on coming and proving communication to prove, uh, to the belarusian society that they are better, that they were not recognized at some stage, and they are better. but this is, uh, what element, uh of uh, of the biggest sins is vanity, uh, and vanity and pride are correct. and this is the most terrible thing of all these pride in vanity. these are these people, they the most dangerous ideologically, but they are charged with negative , destructive. e, ready to destroy her loved ones. these are the people who should stay there, why, uh, because uh, time will pass and also

western society will be eastern european. there 's more baltic countries out there, will try to get rid of them, because if they already have, uh, charge destruction, it's uh, not realized. on the territory of belarus they were sold there, they will begin to smash stores there. uh, because of the bad life of the car dealership, and everything else. well, that is individual approach is the segmentation that was designated by the attorney general. yes. uh, what was indicated by the resident, that a commission is needed, which will be dealt with individually in relation to each, is a reasonable approach. that is, he responds exactly to the messages that you are saying. well , of course, i understand that in practice it will be quite difficult to do so that, and not, as he says, punish the guilty person. and at the same time, not to forgive someone who is really an enemy of the country, then another question as forecasters. they leaked tikhonovskaya, but with the world political arena has descended until trump

alant merkel runs johnson is a handsome man, yes, who is now trying to be photographed with such an interesting cap in the background. ah. these roosters are about the ninetieth year. well , let me give you a forecast for 2023. you can name at least three more names of political names that will follow them, you know. i'll probably comment on the basic principle. why are they, uh, removed and this principle will work in the twenty-third and beyond the basic principle, uh, and approach to analysis. uh, such rotations lies in the fact that these personal ones do not represent any political force and have no support within society and within the masses. remember how you removed it. johnson was just taken out. was it some sort of democratic election?

this is not an election. there is practically no corporation there. yes, the big owners of banks have gathered. e industrial enterprises and decided to hire this manager for this period of time. let him work, in fact, residents, chancellors, prime ministers. this simple, but miserable nothing, and not meaningful e managers, but who, in which case, can suddenly turn up and change, therefore, we need to understand. the most important thing is who, and in europe , is not currently fulfilling the task of corporations or banks. and who do we see? uh, definitely, we see, yes, there are, uh, some m-m contradictions between germany and the anglo-saxon world there are contradictions between hungary and europe yes, there are contradictions between uh the whole of europe, the anglo-saxon world and serbia yes, that is,

uh , they understand that these personal they create a resonance, an unhealthy resonance. uh, like nato structures, like structures of the european union , and in principle, uh, in the mode of governing europe, but this should not be, especially when the west is leading. uh, a very tight confrontation not only with russia, but in principle with the collective east plus china here. and, of course, uh, the front must be united, so, most likely, we will see in the near future, uh, attacks or some kind of technology, including elements, and protest technologies, it is territory. uh, maybe germany uh, maybe uh we'll see and uh, hungary in the balkans, but the danger of the anglo-saxon world or anglo-saxon political technologists, that is, british american ones, is that they, uh,

often act within the framework of certain clichés and not completely hmm and deeply understand the interests of a european, not even a citizen, but european business owner. yes, there are large business owners in europe, there are also owners of large corporations, there are owners of banks, companies and what we see, there the position of scholz in other european countries, large france italy is just an element when large european corporation owners come to these appointees to these managers and say what you are doing. do you live here? we pay taxes here and you get from these taxes, and yours, including, uh, bonuses will earn a fee, therefore, you are not acting in the interests of the united states of america, but acting in the interests of us, our companies. let's not think a little about how

to please washington, but let's think about how to please us. and why because if you do n't, tomorrow there will be protests and protests this can result in the fact that the guys will come and start cutting everyone's head, and they perfectly understand this. you are very beautifully democratic. i would even say expert diplomatic. here is how the situation would be described. let's. i will ask direct questions. i want direct answers. so schultz will retire at 23. i think they won't eliminate him. i think that vučić will leave, i will try to remove the orbán, they will not be able to remove him , they will try, but they will not be able to remove him, because the support from the hungarian people really wanted this i really wanted to hear exactly this, because it is a bit contradictory, yes, the statements above are macron, well

, after all, millions of shares, and the macron is a person who, well, today, he woke up, he is on the side of the encas-saxons. tomorrow i woke up, he is on the side of the european french business, so the biden continues. the situation that is now developing on his drain through secret documents suggests that the corporation is tired of him and they will clean him up. well, there is also a change in england is possible. i can't even remember his last name is still so really. at a significant premier , the same thing will not happen to him that the slime of rhinestones after 8 months. you know, great britain , i must say, in passing, an element of how the look is now draining or destroying the royal family. here it is no longer unimportant about the prime minister, it is important how they discredit and devalue, and the status of the

royal family. who does it does it. uh, the united states of america, which, in principle, are themselves representatives of the royal family, but with their help. yes, but you have to understand that this is enmity within the anglo-saxon world. it's like, uh, since the war between the united states of america and the united kingdom, the constitution is nowhere. it will not be saved. uh, and so, uh, another prime minister is important right now. this is what is unambiguous. for what purpose is he a native of e? from financial circles before. uh, remember that the previous ones even uh, boris jones what idea they promoted the idea of ​​a new british empire idea, uh where the sun never sets they said, let's bring production back to us to the uk the same thing that trump literally said, there 6 years ago. yeah, and you have

to understand that this is a group of owners, industrial enterprises, uh, or so -called experts, real economies, they lost the fiasco and were chosen. uh, there is a model that adhered to, uh, thatcher when she was guided by the fact that britain should develop at the expense of speculative capital, that is, stock exchanges, and the concentration of banks, but within itself, but the most important thing is that now they are not competing with the united states of america they compete with the asia-pacific region plus the middle east, competition has intensified and therefore such a very difficult financial economic situation in the uk itself is good. these are the resignations that took place in zelensky’s apparatus, the high-profile resignations of a dozen people, a dozen high-ranking officials. some experts

compare this with what you say, that a struggle has begun between american and british influence on zelensky. do you agree with this or not, i completely agree without argumentation, but it only needs spice. e it should be noted that resignations are not made by zelensky, but by personnel, but by employees of, uh, british or american intelligence services who sit there and say to remove this today. well, the director of the cia did not go by chance. e, talked, talked and the abandonment began. yes, therefore, in reality, they are all these personal e, no matter what high positions they occupy there, they are nothing of themselves. so they were told, says the arrestovich, they said to speak. so he said, they said to shut up. here he was silent. now he says a few the opposite. well, uh, here it is again, yes, let's get back to our borders closer, and not so long ago

, a weather forecast was shown on central polish television, where five western, uh, ukrainian regions suddenly became polish. in fact, the whole lviv region, tam and so on are marked with one color. here, whether another redistribution threatens us this year, if not the world, it is at least the closest environment. yes, it should be noted that it was such a very good test of the reaction of the reaction of the removal of the reaction from everyone, that is, from everyone players and the united states of america from britain from russia and from above, including with ukraine, that is, it is clear that poland is playing its game. and that is, not with roles for someone, but with my provocative game, it’s enough, but i think the appearance of this picture with these areas. this is not accidental, but they are clearly interested in what would hmm happen, but in

some situation, and which would be favorable for them to carry out this blitz, a and capture these territories, they openly. they say i mean the poles, uh openly. e, in principle discusses. uh, the domor regime has been over the past 20 years, so, of course, this is not a threat to the regime of holding its own on the territory of ukraine, it is a threat to europe, primarily to germany , france, italy, because the expansion of poland and the holding of such egregious actions will definitely change the alignment of forces in europe itself well, you boorish behavior of poland in relation to germany repeatedly. it's all from the same opera. this is a challenge is a challenge. e to what first violin. uh in europe uh ready. and in principle, in the case of support from the

united states of america, poland will play, but the most important thing here is the aspect, will warsaw decide to carry out such an operation? well , you know me. i just doubt it the least . i think the situation. here's my idea. i'm not an expert. i'm just an outside observer. yes, i am absolutely sure that warsaw will decide, it is just waiting for the moment, after all, for two decades in polish schools in belarus, for some reason, the map of poland had borders near minsk and this, and not this, were not shy about work. we have here on the territory. okay, what is not drawn. yes, there is already a global supply of weapons to ukraine with equipment. we'll figure it out later. well, here's the keynote from last year. he boiled now yes, there are 22 countries left in the world. which have not yet been attacked by great britain yes, among them, belarus will it be possible to maintain a place in this

twenty in the twenty-third year? you absolutely rightly said that britain always had plans to go through belarus through poland through the baltic states through ukraine to cut off russia from the two seas from the baltic to the black sea and connect this space for itself to make a very strong buffer zone between a-a, technologically advanced germany and energy-developed russia, this can be read in treatises at the end of the 19th century. this buffer zone. will uh belarus retain its membership in this list, but the lists of countries. e, which was not included in the magnificence will definitely retain the main, probably the leitmotif with the main reason or force. us is that we hmm thanks to our president very

clearly understood. the strength of integration processes, the strength of integration formations in the post-soviet space, not in vain, the cis is here in minsk, it is not in vain that we intensively developed the theme of a union state and, most importantly, supported this theme of a union state, starting from the late nineties. remember how many of those liberal forces were in russia itself that tried, but to look for. uh, the idea of ​​a union state from crediting it only thanks to the president, the idea of ​​a union the state was preserved and then it was already more than taken up by russia when , in fact, the russian federation at some stage was left alone with no allies. only belarus acted as that reliable ally, which a. he supported the ideas and supported and the third motive is that we very closely

interacted economically financially with the children's pacific region and the middle east, which gave us the opportunity, first of all, that they began to perceive us not as some kind of backward agrarian country, but to perceive sally as the industrial side a technological country, and most importantly, a country that can successfully do business with everyone, regardless of any sanctions, and threats of restrictions, and once you can do business with us. and most importantly, we fulfill our obligations, and this is appreciated in difficult conditions. you know, i'm summing up what you said, i want to emphasize one idea that they began to really perceive as an independent independent player in the political and strong, no matter how they try to distort this idea . what exactly will teach 23 years even

the shoemaker is to understand war technology. a very relevant topic and more tanks more weapons for ukraine bmp people are starting to understand the specifics. you have to give them their due, look here. challenger leopards are in themselves yes, heavy tanks yes? the same leclercs, yes, the french ones are not very adapted to the war on the black soil and ukraine well, okay, there is another factor. e deplorable state of two-thirds of ukrainian bridges and bridge structures. yes, then a question. why send them to ukraine ukraine is a testing ground, and for testing a modern look the armament feature of these tanks is abram leopards. uh, and all other nato countries in

that they, and hmm, can be integrated into the system by a network of central combat control, and since 2004 they began to modernize these abrams, and leopards, and integrate blocks into them that allowed, but you see the computer system that controls the battle. these tanks guide them and tell them where to shoot, where the threat is. moreover, the modernization provided, including the placement of certain even phones external phones on the outside of these tanks. how do i know at one time, i just had to translate these articles from english from uh british magazines to american magazines that described, well, the order of modernization of these tanks. why is a telephone needed in order to be able to connect the infantryman with the crew, and if in the event of a failure of the communication system, or

the central control network, what does this mean? and the west is trying to enter the territory of ukraine. this is my beautiful, they saw in the twenty-second year to apply modern combat control methods. this is the basis. now it's intelligence. it's a radio fight. yes, this is the suppression of various signals. this is the use of satellites. and some blocks are integrated, and they are trying to throw these abrams there in order to see how they will work there 10 tanks 20 30 tanks, even if they are burned ah, they will understand there in 2 3 4 days. uh, whether this model is successful or unsuccessful, that is, how many ukrainians will die in this case, does not matter at all. it does not matter at all, because, and the engineer of these defense corporations will make their conclusions conclusions will sell. this is once again the pentagon the pentagon will request this money from the

state budget. and that's why it's a business. nothing personal good. well, it may be unexpected then for the layman turn. yes, but as it is, japan for some reason they began to call it the new ukraine, many experts talk about it out loud. for the first time since world war ii, she is doubling military spending and tying it to the rapidly growing threat from china, given the size of the japanese economy. these plans could bring the country to third in military spending after the united states and china, behold, should these awakened samurai be underestimated. yes, you noted correctly. this is such a cliché about japan that this is a new ukraine in asia, uh, was given in the global times chinese edition, and from the position of what that japan, the united states

of america can use uh, as quasil force in confrontation with china, that is, not taiwan conflict, well, the reason for the conflict, maybe taiwan or some islands, but the americans themselves fight with their own, but with soldiers. want they want to fight with the hands of japanese, proven technology. and that's what the chinese are talking about. hmm, it's clear that the militarization of japan does not bring anything good in the region, but it's important to realize that , er, the japanese are really far from politics, and hmm, they don't track much. eh, what their government is conditionally doing, but what the government says, they will do, but it is traditional for them and it is important here is the aspect e of understanding. like the japanese themselves, despite the fact that heramoshima nagasaki were related to the united states of america a. remember, uh, traditionally they

gather every year, and pray to remember, but do not raise any political topics. who is to blame in this sense, they change they invite the american word to these events, but here a very important aspect is that e islands from each other the population of the islands and the attitude towards americans are completely different from each other in akinawa. we know there is an american base. so these are the atrocities that are being done by e, american soldiers in okinawa, it causes a strong protest. and uh, okinawans. you don't have to be convinced that americans are evil, but no one hears them. uh-huh okay convinced watch 2023 and money. the united states again reached, well, the state long limit once again on january 19, it amounted to 31.4 trillion us dollars. yes, it's a lot

or a little, well, if the total amount of american money in the world is about 644 trillion. well, it seems to be a little, it seems to be, yes, but given that this amount has grown 32 times in 40 years, and each time they raised this limit. well, then, probably, there are a lot of cases here, to exclude cases, the ministry of finance is ready to accept extraordinary measures. although they seem to me very clear. yes, they will again refuse certain contributions to social funds of pension funds, as the american social sector always suffers. here in your opinion, where is the ceiling. finance yes, and how it will affect ordinary people. and most importantly, what will it lead to. yes, it is important to note the most important thing here. aspect that in 2012, and this debt exceeded the volume of gdp. that is, now it is 130% more than these 31.4 trillion, and the gdp of the united

states of america, that is, even the real economy, even the work of the financial sector in the united states of america, even the work of the entire defense complex, which is 50% of the us gdp, does not compensate for the external debt. yeah , but the question arises, how to return? it is clear that this is a ah model, yes, mmm can exist, uh, further only at the expense, well, further expansion is understandable, but the question is who will buy these bonds, and they will only buy uh, in the case when the federal reserve regime is turn. the united states of america is no longer just, but into a certain element of e-hegemony, but into an element of harsh terror in relation to all the rest of the countries. that is, it will be those strange ones that are dependent. come already demand that they buy this

debt not by financial mechanisms, not by economic ones, but by the mechanisms of profitability and reliability, liquidity will be determined, and they will come, - he says, you do not want to buy. your government doesn't want to buy our bonds or banks? well , you might not wake up tomorrow. well let's talk straight 2 years ago. this was harder to do. than now. they are so attached to this one military special operation to himself all. well, okay, but let's literally question it. yes , the eternal fear of any belarusian of all years. yes , not only 23, that these american pieces of paper, they will turn into candy wrappers. that's how much this fear is justified now. hmm, and or we are still exaggerating a little with regard to the next few years, at least. well, you know, our task. e is not, here you and i are not to thicken, e, colors or engage in propaganda to speak?

hurry up, come on uh, heading to the side bank to issue yours, and hard-earned dollars or there, converted belarusian rubles into dollars. but no, we are extremely objective. and most likely, we’ll just advise you to sit on the news feed and see what china is doing . they do everything in order to get rid of dollars in their calculations, but remember in december. uh, the president of the people's republic of china where did he go to the middle east ? in fact, the dollar was from oil from a real resource and tied to the yuan, which russia did immediately after it untied oil. energy resources from the dollar. here the euro is tied to its own, and not to currencies of its own free will.

still, they forced us in many ways, including through restrictions. yes, but the question is why . these empty candy wrappers, as it were correctly said , they can exist, that is, have a real value, when they are for what. what is tied to the gold standard abandoned in the seventies bratman woods system destroyed, then why because gold too little for a speculative financial model to develop, they began to tie e to oil and gas, as if there are much more of them than e, gold, but now in china and in russia and the middle east there are good financiers and economists who perfectly understand financial and economic power of the united states of course. eh, and understands the weaknesses of this model and now we see, but very uh hmm, the growth of this weakness. well, let's still, honestly, let's say that the weakening of

the dollar and the increase in mutual settlements in other currencies and reserves in the state and other currencies. this is the process today. e is clearly the dollar, it is unlikely that something threatens, at least for the next few years. well, this is my deep. beliefs are absolutely right. yes, this is confirmed by figures; this is confirmed by the situation in the military today . it’s not that america somehow provided its energy needle, on which it planted europe and, plus , provided military orders for its enterprises for years ahead, thanks to the fact that all other reserves have already been taken. well, if objectively, well, okay, but the direction. to me i like it now about information security, it is impossible not to talk about it, while the united states began to aggressively curb the technological development of china and russia and in general yes, well, and chinese tiktok in particular. on the contrary, we are now

more and more ready and want rapprochement with russia in the information space. the plan for 23 years has been repeatedly voiced to create a single media holding. and not only the question is not simple. we personally have long been showing the political product of the russians here on our territory all the time. yes, but they also have something learn. we have, among other things, in terms of building information work. here's what you think are the hottest issues or gaps you need to address right now. yes, in order for this information space of the joint union state to work in both directions and become real. yes, a very difficult topic, it is caused primarily by the fact that m-th principles worked. ah, the media component in belarus and the media component in russia over the past 30 years. they were completely different.

and remember how it was formed so called, independent about the media e, in the russian federation, their focus was changed only in fact after their own in 2022. and so, uh, everyone could a-a broadcast in completely different keys, completely opposite, and often the state agenda was obscured or left. uh, to some other positions thanks to the active work of private media platforms, which, uh, were financed, uh, and not by government funds or but by private corporations, and this caused some kind of unhealthy resonance in the minds of a simple uh russian inhabitant, therefore a first of all, the task is not for us for belarusians. we know how to work. in the interests of the state, we know how to work in the interests of

our people, the task for russians is to figure out for themselves where the interests of their russian people are, where the interests of the russian state are. uh-huh and where are the main well, let's call them not enemies, but those who resist those who resist. it's by inertia. there are many more. that's when they have a clear understanding inside themselves of how they want hmm protect our information field from negative impact, then we can very easily resolve issues within the framework of creating an allied holding, but everything would be fine, if we had time, but we don’t have time. and the russian federation does not have time for a union state, there is no time. therefore, there is only one way out, but to take our model and distribute it as a derivative, and not

only to moscow, the moscow region. uh, st. petersburg, leningrad region, express, drop it all over the territory of the russian federation, distribute content our content. and our messages are our meanings, because we have already clearly defined within the framework of the program, belarus a for e. the period since the creation of the union state has not moved one iota. the very idea of ​​a union state, and we did not have liberal politicians, but technologists. we didn't have any uh, pro-western liberal media that could discredit this idea, so we have to take it. aggregate collect do images do. uh, similarity and use our model, just in the work of the union holding

, you know, i'll be honest. i am always practical and in my opinion. that's how soon although the competitors, of course, i should not say, but as soon as belarus 24 and belarus 1, as independent belarusian tv channels. eh, they will enter the cable networks of moscow, st. petersburg and central russia in general, we can say that the process has moved off the ground, as long as they are not allowed in there and do not want to be allowed in. well, accordingly, we are talking about the fact that business prevails over the interests of the state; the ideology is different. well, this is tougher, but i agree. here, let's talk a little more about independent media, since we're already at the end. ideology. eh, information that is alien to us has disappeared. uh, that 40 for many years paid 54 influential figures. the media is bloomberg senn and many others, right? and from 2016 to 20, he

spent $131 million to cover world events, as he sees perfectly. here, it's really great. but what is it is a cross on american democracy and media independence or is it a good example to follow. ah, you know, we must also add that the same soros funds paid a lot. a-a research question research manipulation of public opinion, public consciousness, and in all post-soviet ones, that is, why was this done? not for the sake of what, ah, the quarrels wanted to see, only exclusively themselves on these channels. he did not pay correctly for himself, he paid correctly for the transmission of the necessary meanings, conflicting ideologies or ideas, and one must understand that he was quarreling. he is

not a philanthropist, who, uh, just invested in these media, he always, uh, profited from this why, because through these, but media platforms, promoting certain or others are liberal. eh, the idea, he, thus, naturally could promote his function more easily, but promote it. there literature publications prepare the right politicians. there, for which they paid correctly. that is, he was, but hired, and the manager was such an agent. e state department, which, uh, came up with. uh, a very wonderful training technology, and young politicians who are there in 5-10-15 years, but can carry out a velvet lula evolution and rule the country. why take over the country? if you can prepare an elite, then resell a newspaper, that's what he did, that is. eh, so when we talk about

why he bought these channels, what he broadcast, and he broadcast. uh, in principle, creating an illusory picture through, uh, media platforms, but i did n’t come up with anything new. we remember more than once, u within the framework and the work of our u different dialogue sites. uh, here the tv channel discussed what e, the quarrel was read, in principle, by zhany bodilyar, a and his simulacra simulations and uh, nothing new. they did not come up with, that is, it is hyperreality. e, in which u are immersed, the population is immersed by the elites, and they feel er, the state there is a euphoric state, and the right choice of democracy. uh, hmm liberalism and so on, but the bottom line of all this is all this illusion.