get the necessary technology technology. i want to say that, let's say, the minsk tractor plant - this is in the period from 2018 to 2022 delivered e. in zimbabwe, too, uh, that means, uh, about 1800. uh, units, equipment and last year. uh, it means that for the first time in the last 50 years of its sovereign history, zimbabwe has completely provided itself with grain, it is obvious that there is also the contribution of the republic of belarus here, and our country is a key partner for zimbabwe in the implementation of a rather ambitious national program of agricultural mechanization. how are you correctly said africa is not only, of course, the problems of poverty or there, but various local armed conflicts, which, by the way, are largely stimulated by external players who want to fish in this troubled water. these are also fast-growing markets, fast-growing economies of many countries over the past 15 years. here is the list quickly. the economy has constantly featured

african countries in this regard as zimbabwe is gradually stabilizing its economic situation. difficulties were observed there some time ago, of course. are of interest to us. well, we help this country to extract minerals. we 've been working with them for quite some time now. we are in this sense here is the visit of the president. it's kind of like this. here. uh, a good result, the crown of long-term cooperation is that even viktor vladimirovich shein started his projects there. i also wanted to add something about your remark that lukashenka is able to build relationships with different leaders with strong subjective leaders who are masters in the good sense of the word in their country, which is guided by the primacy of national interests with such politicians, regardless of religious races and ideological differences. we find a common language. so it would be, bitch chavez , so we have a president. zimba in a sardagan with

russian president putin with the chinese leader xi jingping with people who themselves are responsible for their words. they expect the same from their partners, which is why lukashenka is here. in this case, he really found a friend for himself and nangagov’s brother is known in the american on the american continent, he also has a nickname, corresponding in political circles to the crocodile. that is, this is a principled man, a veteran of the anti-colonial movement. here, of course, are the messages of the belarusian president, both political and proposals in the field of business cooperation. they found understanding there. and what for us is africa the president the day before, answering questions from journalists on this topic. and he spoke very clearly. let's listen without africa there can be no prospects in the world. in general, here are the resources. there are people here. here people every year become all the education here comes the newest technologies. the world

cannot develop without africa. therefore, we are our friends here. we came to friends, wherever you were in africa, uh, in whatever country you were? whoever i date, they are our friends. we negotiate with them in the name of our peoples. we have never agreed, we do not agree together against third countries on the initiative of my friend. we discussed the issue of cooperation yesterday. uh, zimba would be belarus and mozambique mozambique is the largest country nearby, the coast is 1.000 km, an agricultural country requires huge investments in agriculture economy. we already have experience and the president says this is my friend the president. e mozambique and we will soon discuss how our experience. zimba belarusian transfer to mozambi we are going in

peace, we are not going, as when the colonialists retreated to the colonial, how they captured and exploited the people. we bring technologies here and we teach people here these technologies. well, this is an absolutely extremely clear objective look at what is happening on a partner who is now called the belarusian president's brother. this suggests that, in principle, we can long-term to plan. uh, interaction on this region. pyotr petrovsky joined us, but for now, let's give the opportunity to take a breath alexander ivanovich but we are one way or another we are now leaving this topic and see what the president said about this. but they forgot the africans, they forgave these centuries of apartheid genocide that the belgians from the congo did what france did there in algeria in libya, but the british, of course. now when they line up on this huge and we understand perfectly very diverse african continent external contacts. they

take into account what has been decades and centuries, in principle, continues one way or another. now we see that the african continent in many of its areas is turning into a testing ground for medicines, and social structures are tribes. it's not just that they appear here. how do you see it? today we will say so colonialism, or rather, these genes at the gene level of africans at the gene level. name me a country in africa that was not a colony, well, conditionally, you can name only south africa well, that's all. everything else, everything was colonies, and today, when there is even a mass exodus, let's say, uh, the collective west from africa, we are seeing this in the burkins of acs pagan in other countries. here, uh, in general, the nation- states that have been created. they are trying. uh, let's say oust the bases,

including basically a lot of french military bases. here it is at this level. naturally, this will happen. but the fact that they remember it and know it, of course, it is will be for many generations. it is inscribed in their history, it is already inscribed in their history. it means you won’t go there, but for today nowhere, yes, in general, such a picture turns out that if in general the world economy, so to speak, there will be recession issues, very well with the main serious ones, then the development of the world economy will just go only for today day only at the expense of african countries. they develop, they want to develop, and today they play a big role in this. russia china and today day. i hope belarus is even. there will be on its feet will deal with this issue issue. only one always remains. what will they pay for? well then , let's remember the old picture of barter. well, in

general, they have something to pay for. they have they have resources and these resources, including rare earth material. therefore, we need to have something at the expense of what, how and where to go and develop. we are talking about colonialism in africa, but he acquired it, if he says so directly somewhere in the sixties and seventies years of a new form, the so-called not about neolism, the basis of which is not an equivalent exchange, that is, france what to do with its former colonies involved them in some kind of monetary unions, where france determines the entire monetary policy of these countries ; moreover, france until recently time dominated in terms of mining part of the rare earth metals and not only rare earth metals. what we see from, uh, the visit of the president of belarus to the zimbabs, that the

president of belarus offered the zimbas is an equivalent exchange. that is, we are tractors for you. we give you the modernization of agriculture, and in return after the modernization of agriculture. you will provide yourself with food, including food for us. m-th agricultural goods at least, which we cannot produce under objective climatic conditions the second moment. we provide for you. uh mining machinery. you will provide us with the raw materials that we need, including for import substitution and in electronics as well, that is, we see a completely new philosophy of relations, where is the african partner. this is not, uh, an errand boy, when everything is sucked out of him as much as possible and nothing is given to him in return and then they ask. why such rich soils

such a climate cannot provide food for african states. and this is becoming a real partner. africa is the second continent in the world, there is one and a half billion people and, most importantly, a dynamic population. if europe and even already asia sags a little, the african continent shows quite good dynamics. ukraine is now turning into a colony ukraine maybe it’s not turning into a classic african colony. it turns into a latin american quasi-state of the type, when external management, debt load and complete hmm complete dependence on technological technological currency, otherwise, uh, fetter the leadership and make it practically a puppet. here is what we see here generally correctly. today these concepts of colonialism should be transferred to the existing agenda, for example, compared with ukraine, or, in principle, such a narrative is

incorrect and should be abandoned. well, of course, at the level, probably, of official diplomacy. e should choose an expression, as for the level of, let's say, expert publicists of politicians, then there is a lot of freedom to maneuver, allowing you to call a spade a spade, if the state provides itself with tax customs revenues only by 25%, and 75% of the budget is formed by foreign loans subsidies, subsidies, other forms of payments, if the armed forces are waging war solely on the basis of the supply of foreign weapons equipment and they themselves declare that they are defending the interests of the military-political bloc, which they do not belong to. well, how is it, otherwise we can call it because they no longer talk about the fact that they protect the interests of ukraine in general in fact. if you look at, uh, uh, the current conflict

in terms of the declared interests of the supporters. in fact, we are talking about the fact that the war began after the west rejected the proposal of russia on security guarantees key e, the key thesis of these proposals was that it was necessary to agree to the west of the russian federation to ukraine that ukraine will not be a member of nato that is, we can say that these tens of thousands, and some are talking about hundreds of thousands of losses, that's the ukrainian armed forces of the ukrainian people. they are, well, simply. uh fell. uh. now she said that it would be nice to take ukraine into nato to harm russia . now you understand, this decision will be made or not taken depending on the situation on the line of contact today . there is no need to take ukraine nato for the simple reason that this will force the west to use the so-called fifth article of the charter of the north of the atlantic alliance and enter into direct military

confrontation with the russian federation, their military-political thought is based on the postulate that it is impossible to be drawn into the direct military channel of the german foreign ministry, which will remind not just girl not just even wrote some party. this is the head of the foreign ministry of the largest european power declares nato is waging war against russia very simply means that de facto nato is waging war against russia means supplying ukraine with equipment and weapons and sending there the so-called hybrid formations, which are not formally related to the armed forces of the countries of the north atlantic alliance but in fact consist of, uh, former military personnel who are or have terminated their contractual relations. or they use the cover legend in order to mean to fight on the territory of ukraine, that is. e, ber god, in principle, called a spade a spade. here, and the fifth article is not needed in a direct

military confrontation. they don't get involved moreover. we know that trade relations between russia and the countries of the north atlantic alliance are maintained, moreover, gas is pumped through the territory of ukraine and there are no military actions. so, here, uh, this segment of the energy, let's say, cooperation is not affected. it’s not ukrainian radical nationalists, nazis, and so on, which means they don’t encroach on the safety of this pipe. well, somehow in russia this topic is also being discussed. i'm colleagues. i am talking about the colony with, as it were, i convey what many people say and are related to ukraine is not in order to offend ukraine, which is already lower than ukraine, now here is dmitry evgenievich and when we see terrible photographs here, we will not show them in principle , so that she would see it here when she was leaving the battlefield for something, trying to hide, that foreign mercenaries are fighting with pipes of their hands and heads, but this is savagery. it

's like these tribal wars in africa, because you don't have to think about these colo. the stories that were there, but it's terrible. i think for the red cross this is also a headache for the global organization. what do? from this, well, do not know the humanitarian situation, the humanitarian situation. there we have been talking for a long time that there is a humanitarian catastrophe there, but in fact, these uh, some separate ones, you can’t even call troops, because when a soldier like that they won’t do some sort of formation of absolutely incomprehensible people, er, who do such things with their dead , it doesn't matter what they do with the prisoners. yes, it does not fit into any framework at all. and this, of course, goes beyond the understanding of humanity in general. and it should definitely be further investigated, what the russian federation is talking about now, because there should be respect. there is a convention, the usual normal swiss convention

for the treatment of prisoners. yes, and what happens sometimes. it just goes beyond the understanding of the human. attention, in general, what about tanks, as a military expert, alexandrovich i ask you a lot of times they talk about leopards about abrams, but on the other hand, we see that biden tricked the schultz. he promised he said, i'm abrams and the leopards, he went. and in the end, now the americans are a country says it's good, if before the end of the year we transfer abramets, and how significantly this can affect how it proceeds. uh, the operation in ukraine, she began a special operation time, the ukrainian armed forces were somewhere around 2.850 tanks on the move. that's because there was how much it was repaired there, but it was removed from preservation, these things were already further in the process. to date, uh, it is believed that they have about 150 tanks left. basically, this is the t-72b3. that's

uh, or hard. this is what was transmitted, poland poland has transferred the most tanks most of all to date. we can talk, so 200 of these 40-250 tanks, which will be handed over to the ukrainian armed forces. they won't change the situation. they will create difficulties. yes, this is a rather difficult target to hit, and let's say, about four or five, you need points to hit one tank, this is a heavy tank t-72 - this is a medium tank, there is about 45-47 tons. leopard sixty-two 63, well, depending on armament and armor up to 67 tons. that's enough. so to speak. e complex a c electronic plan. they will be able to master weapons and training for training here, it will take at least 2 months 2 months about six months. well , half a year - this will change, that's the

fundamental picture. i said no, but difficulties for the russian armed forces. they will also create the question that if they, uh, well, scatter them, let's say, along the entire front line. they will do nothing at all if they create some kind of tank, and armor fists. for the offensive, she, too, zaporozhye, as they want. that's it, it's going to be pretty tricky value, very interesting episode. now it has happened. we see that the united states recently said that they are ready to use any means to protect south korea , including nuclear weapons, and in this case they saw how offended the ukrainians were. what kind of ukraine nobody promised to use nuclear weapons? or at least to scare them somehow, and for south korea, which to enter everything peter, why is such injustice in quotation marks south korea, together with israel, is allies of the united states of america in non-natu and therefore the united states and having there

own military base and seeing, certain hmm uh, certain activity of the dprk, and activity e, it should be admitted, e, quite successful when the drones of the dprk can fly e over the palace of the president of the republic of korea yes , this is the reason only in the dprk, or is it still an attack by the side china, uh, including from china because the dprk is an ally of the people's republic of china and the dprk would never have done such actions without consultation with china, moreover, it should. here is the whole situation to consider together with taiwan. china tells the united states of america that if pandora opens around taiwan, then pandora opens around south korea, because the peace truce between the dprk and south korea is not signed

or organized, so there are two cases that will start to operate one together with others and the americans, making such statements. they say that they are allegedly ready to raise certain prices, does this mean that the fron is thus gradually transferred there to the south asian region. i leave ukraine in that the form in which it is now present not yet. in my opinion, at the same time, it is necessary to understand that, nevertheless, the main strategic adversary in the united states of america is not russia china, e, the russian federation is interpreted as yurin suret. that is, this is a current strategic threat, an adversary, the people's republic of china, an adversary that is throwing a serious challenge to american gigionism in the field of economics. and much of what is happening in europe now must also be interpreted in the context of the confrontation between the united states and china here the united states of america seeks to gain

full political military economic control over the european union. it will be strengthened at the expense of its resources, which in the future, according to the plan of american strategists, should allow them to make a technological breakthrough and defeat china in the competition in the field of the artificial intelligence economy. and so on. this is the context in which this war should be viewed. naturally. in this regard. they will create tension in china and the direction of the korean and the direction of taiwan and here was the visit of the pilose. now we we see that the new head of the e north american congress is planning to visit about the country of tach. yes, i'm a provocation. it is clear there that, on the domestic political front in china, this will also be played out with various kinds of american forces that are there. so, how to incite on the one hand. uh, leadership, china to some decisive action on the other hand to reproach the softness of the leader. we have already seen all this. well, this is important. here's something else to remember, the united states of america is the only power that has experience applications.