industrial enterprises or the so-called experts of the real economy, she lost the debacle and is selected. uh, the model that adhered to, uh, thatcher uh, when it was guided by the fact that britain should develop at the expense of speculative capital, that is, stock exchanges, and the concentration of banks, but within itself, but the most important thing is that now they are not competing with the united states of america, they compete with the asia-pacific region, plus competition from the middle east has intensified and therefore such a very difficult financial economic situation. it's good in the uk. these are the resignations that took place in zelensky’s apparatus, the high-profile resignations of a dozen people, a dozen high-ranking officials. some experts. this is being compared with what you say, that a struggle has begun between the americans. and the english influence on

zelensky, do you agree with this or not? completely agree without argument? and it only needs one aspect, to note that when making resignations, it’s not zelensky who makes resignations, but personnel ones, but employees, e, british or american intelligence services that sit there and say this is the one to remove the director today. the cia has not gone by chance. uh, talked, chatted, and the leftovers started yes, so they're really all these personal ones. um, does it matter what high positions they hold there? doesn't represent anything. so they were told, he said, to the arrest officer, they said he was talking, so he said, they said to shut up. here he was silent. now he says the opposite. well, uh, here it is again, yes, back to our closer to the borders, and not so long ago, on the central polish television, they showed a weather forecast, where are the five western ones, eh?

ukrainian regions suddenly became polish. really, the whole lviv region is marked with one color, there and so on. here, whether another redistribution threatens us this year, if not the world, it is at least the closest environment. yes, it should be noted that it was such a very good test of the reaction test of the reaction of removing the reaction from everyone, that is, from all the players and the united states of america from britain from russia and from above, including with ukraine, that is it is clear that poland is playing its game. and that is, not with roles for someone, but with my provocative game, it’s enough, but i think the appearance of this picture with these areas. this is not accidental, but they are clearly interested in hmm in case, but in a certain situation, and which will be favorable for them to hold this blisk, a and

seize these territories, they openly talk about they say, i mean the poles, uh openly. e, in principle discusses. uh, the domor swoon regimen has been around for probably the last 20 years, so of course this represents not a threat to the regime of holding its own on the territory of ukraine, this poses a threat to europe, primarily to germany , france, italy, because the expansion of poland and the holding of such a blatant action will definitely change the balance of power in europe itself. well, that is, the boorish behavior of poland towards germany repeatedly. it's all from the same opera. this is a challenge is a challenge. e to the fact that the first violin. uh in europe uh ready. and in principle, in the case of support from the united states of america, it will play more, but the most important thing here is the aspect

. will warsaw decide to carry out such an operation? well , you know, i just doubt it the least . i think the situation. here's my idea. i'm not an expert. i'm just an outside observer. yes, i am absolutely sure that warsaw will decide, it is just waiting for the moment, after all, for two decades in polish schools in belarus, the map of poland for some reason had borders near minsk and this, and they did not hesitate to work. we have here on the territory. okay, what is not drawn. yes in reality, global deliveries of weapons to ukraine with equipment are already taking place. we 'll figure it out later. well, here's the keynote from last year. he boiled now yes, there are 22 countries left in the world. which have not yet been attacked by great britain yes, among them, belarus will it be possible to maintain a place in this twenty in the twenty-third year? you absolutely correctly said that britain always had plans to

cut off russia from the two seas from the baltic sea to the black sea through belarus through poland through ukraine and connect this space for itself a very strong buffer zone between a technologically advanced germany and an energy developed russia can be read in treatises at the end of the 19th century. everything has been written about it. yes, with the uk’s attempts to create this buffer zone, will uh hmm belarus retain membership in this list, and the lists of countries, uh, which were not included in the uk will definitely retain the main, probably motive with the main reason or strength of us lies in the fact that we hmm thanks to our president very clearly understood. the strength of integration processes is the strength

integration formations in the post-soviet space, it is not in vain that the e-cis is here in minsk, it is not in vain that we intensively developed the theme of the union state and, most importantly , supported this theme of the e-union state, starting from the late nineties. remember how many of those liberal forces were in russia itself that tried to distort, uh, the idea of ​​a union state, to credit and only thanks to the president the idea of ​​​​a union state was preserved, and then it was more than picked up by russia when in fact, the russian federation at some stage was left alone without allies. only belarus acted as that reliable ally, which a. i supported the ideas and the third motive is that we very closely interacted economically financially with the asia-pacific region and the middle

east, which gave us the opportunity, first of all, that they began to perceive us not as some kind of backward agrarian country, but sally to perceive the industrial side as a technological country, and most importantly, a country that can successfully conduct business with everyone, regardless of any sanctions, and threats of restrictions, and once you can do business with us. and most importantly, we fulfill our obligations in difficult conditions, this is appreciated. you know, i'll sum it up, what did you say? i want to emphasize one idea that they began to really perceive it as an independent independent player in the political arena and a strong one, no matter how they try to distort this idea . what the 23rd year will definitely teach even

as a shoemaker is to understand military equipment. very hot topic yes more tanks more weapons for ukraine bmp people are starting to understand the specifics already. you have to give them their due, look here. challenger leopards are in themselves yes, heavy tanks yes? the same leclercs, yes, the french ones are not very adapted to the war on the black soil and ukraine well, okay, there is another factor. e deplorable state of two-thirds of ukrainian bridges and bridge structures. yes, then a question. why send them to ukraine ukraine is a training ground, and for testing modern weapons, these tanks are a feature. ah, leopard abrams, uh, and all the rest nato countries in that they, uh, can be integrated into the system by a network of central

combat control, and already since 2004 they began to modernize these abrams, and leopards, and integrate blocks into them that allowed, and the system a computer that controls you see the fight. these tanks guide them and tell them where to shoot, where the threat is. moreover, the modernization included, among other things, the placement of certain even external phones on the outside of these tanks. how do i know at one time, just e had to translate these articles from english from uh british magazines to american magazines that described, well, the order of modernization of these tanks. why is a telephone needed in order to be able to connect the infantryman with the crew, and if in the event of a failure of the communication system, or the central control network, what does this mean?

and the west is trying to enter the territory of ukraine this is my beautiful seen in the twenty-second year to apply modern methods of combat management. this is the basis. now it's intelligence. it 's a radio fight. yes, this is the suppression of various signals. this is the use of satellites. and some blocks are integrated, and they are trying to throw these abrams there in order to see how they work there 10 tanks 20-30 will work there, even if they are burned ah, they will understand there in 2 3 4 days . uh, whether this model is successful or unsuccessful, that is, how many ukrainians will die in this case, does not matter at all. it doesn't matter at all, because, while the engineers of these defense corporations will make their conclusions, they will sell the conclusions. it's the pentagon once again the pentagon will request this money from the state budget. and that's why it's a business. nothing personal good. well

, it may be unexpected then for the layman turn. yes, but as it is, japan for some reason, they began to call it the new ukraine, many experts talk about it out loud. for the first time since world war ii, she is doubling military spending and tying it to the rapidly growing threat from china, given the size of the japanese economy. these plans could take the country to third place in military spending behind the us and china, so should these be underestimated? awakened samurai. yes, you noted correctly. this is such a cliché about japan that it is a new ukraine in asia, e, was given in the chinese edition of the global times, and from the position of what that japan, the united states of america can use e, as a quasi-force confrontation with china, that is, not a

conflict with taiwan well, the reason for the conflict, maybe taiwan or some islands, but the americans themselves fight with their own, but with soldiers. they want to fight with the hands of the japanese, proven technology. and that's what the chinese are talking about. hmm it's clear the militarization of japan does not bring anything good in the region, but it is important to realize that , uh, the japanese themselves are really far from politics and hmm, but they don’t track a strongly. uh, what their government does conditionally, but what the government says, they will do. well, it's traditional for them and it's also important here aspect e understanding. like the japanese themselves, despite the fact that hiroshima nagasaki were related to the united states of america a. remember, uh, traditionally they gather every year, and pray to remember, but no political topics are not raised. who

is to blame in this sense, they change they invite the american word to these events, but here a very important aspect is that e islands from each other the population of the islands and the attitude towards americans are completely different from each other in akinawa. we know there is an american base. so these are the atrocities that are being done by e, american soldiers in okinawa, it causes a strong protest. and the people of okinawan. no need to convince that the americans are evil, but no one hears them. uh-huh okay convinced watch 2023 and money. the united states again reached, well, the state long limit once again on january 19, it amounted to 31.4 trillion us dollars. yes, it's a lot or a little, well, if the total amount of american money in the world is about 644 trillion. well, it

seems to be a little, it seems to be, yes, but given that this amount has grown 32 times in 40 years, and each time they raised this limit. well then, that's probably a lot. to avoid default, the ministry of finance is ready to take extraordinary measures. although they seem to me very clear. yes, they will give up again. certain contributions to social funds , pension funds, as the american always suffers, in your opinion, where is the ceiling. finance yes, and how it will affect ordinary people. and most importantly, what will it lead to. yes , it is necessary to note the most important thing here. aspect that in 2012, and this debt exceeded the volume of gdp. that is, now it is 130% more than these 31.4 trillion, and the gdp of the united states of america, that is, even the real economy, even the work

of the financial sector of the united states of america even the work of the entire defense complex, which is 50% of us gdp does not compensate for external debt. yeah, but the question arises, how to return? it is clear that this is a ah model, yes, mmm can exist, uh, further only at the expense, well, further expansion is understandable, but the question is who will buy these bonds, and they will only buy if the federal reserve regime will turn. the united states of america is no longer just, but into a certain element of hegemony, but into an element of harsh terror in relation to all other countries. that is, he will be those strange ones who are in dependencies. come already to demand that they buy this debt by neither financial nor economic mechanisms. uh,

liquidity will be determined by the mechanisms of profitability and reliability, and people will come saying you don't want to buy. your government doesn't want to buy our bonds or banks. well , you might not wake up tomorrow. well let's talk straight 2 years ago. this was harder to do. than now. they tied everyone to this military special operation so much. well, okay, but let's literally question it. yes the eternal fear of any belarusian of all years. yes , not only 23, that these american pieces of paper, they will turn into candy wrappers. that's how much this fear is justified now. hmm, and or we are still exaggerating a little with regard to the next few years, at least. well, you know, our task. e is not, here you and i are not to thicken, e, colors or engage in propaganda to speak? yes, quickly, come on, you’re heading towards the bank to publish your hard-earned

dollars or there, converted belarusian rubles to dollars. but no, we are extremely objective. and most likely, we will simply advise you to sit on the news feed and see what china is doing. what the countries of the near drain are doing, they do everything unambiguously. they do everything in order to get rid of dollars in their calculations. remember december. uh, the president of the people's republic of china where did he go to the middle east ? energy resources from the dollar. she tied the euro to her own, and not to currencies of her own free will. still, they were forced in many ways, including through banking restrictions. yes, but the question is

why these empty candy wrappers. as you rightly said, they can exist, that is, they can have a real value, when they are what they are what is tied to the gold standard abandoned in the seventies, the bratman woods system was destroyed, then why because gold is too small for the speculative financial model to develop began to tie e to oil and gas, as if there are much more of them than e, gold, but now in china and in russia and in the middle east there are good financiers and economists who perfectly understand the financial and economic strength of the united states naturally. eh, and understands the weaknesses of this model and now we see, but very uh hmm, the growth of this weakness. well, let's still, honestly, let's say, yes, that the weakening of the dollar and the increase in mutual settlements in other currencies and reserves in other state

currencies. this is the process today. uh, obviously the dollar is unlikely to be threatened, as for at least the next few years. this is my deep. beliefs are absolutely right. yes, this is confirmed by figures; this is confirmed by the situation in the military today . it’s not that america somehow provided its energy needle, on which it planted europe and, plus , provided military orders for its enterprises for years ahead, thanks to the fact that all other reserves have already been taken. well, if objectively, well, okay, but the direction. i like it now about information security, it’s impossible not to talk about it, while the united states has begun to aggressively curb the technological development of china and russia and yes, in general, but also the chinese tiktok, in particular. on the contrary, we are now more and more ready and want rapprochement with russia in the information space. the plan for 23 years

has been repeatedly voiced to create a single media holding. and not only the question is not simple. we personally have long been showing the political product of the russians here on our territory all the time. yes, but they also have a lot to learn. the moon, including in terms of building information work. here on your opinion, what hot problems or gaps need to be addressed. do you think now. yes, in order for this information space of the joint union state to work in both directions and become real. yes, a very difficult topic, it is caused primarily by the fact that, m-m, the principles of work are a-a media component in belarus and a media component in russia over the past 30 years. they were completely different. do you remember how the so-called independent media organization was formed?