between all nature presents turkey with a new test in the country began a snow storm in istanbul snow fell. many cities turned into ruins and in syria the number of victims of the earthquake. in this country, more than seven hundred are being searched, the survivors most affected by the tremors were alehahma and lataki. among the inhabitants of germany, the protest mood is heating up. life in the country is becoming more expensive at a record pace . politics and cabinet show faces. i'm also worried about the rise, the prices, where this will lead, how we should pay for everything. it is now a very difficult financial situation. it is caused by high inflation and other reasons. i am students, so i am completely self-financed. i work multiple jobs at once. i note the cost of

pork in germany last year increased by 57%. moreover, almost all varieties of meat and meat products imitated the germans have to live in savings mode. more than 23,000 belarusians registered in over 200,000 checks for 18 million rubles have already been issued as professional income tax payers. as noted in the relevant department during january, that is, at the beginning of the work of the new tax regime in the country, a large-scale explanatory work and basic questions were carried out. belarusians have already been removed from citizens and are actively connected to the new regime. the main issues were still the delimitation of the types of activities that can be used by payers, as well as a proposal to expand the list of types of activities, since the list is defined set by the government and includes today only those activities that, in accordance with the civil code does not apply to entrepreneurial tax

authorities, really consider all citizens' appeals. yes, and we are ready to take the initiative to the regulators, so that the civil legislation is already being corrected, with the expansion of the types of activities of which they refer to as entrepreneurial and, in parallel, the expansion of the types of activities for taxpayers on fresh income. that is this work will be carried out during the current year and i remind you to be registered. as a payer, to get acquainted with the amount of tax, write network checks and interact with the relevant authorities remotely via a mobile application. and all the questions. you can find out on the website of the department or vkontakte center. new information from my colleagues at 15:00 on our air. all the best. hello, hello everyone

, we continue to record ongoing events in order to identify patterns in order to analyze how optimal is our strategy. well, to understand in what direction the world is still moving. although this, of course, is not easy, but we have a very strong squad today . i thank our guests for the fact that today they should be waiting with us at petr petrovsky just about. he will join us. ah, and let's not waste time right away, let's start with the current belarusian delegation in africa and led by the belarusian president, this is what is most important for ourselves, what is the main village for ourselves, dmitry evgenievich caught what did you pay attention to? firstly, uh, there is always such an attitude of european countries to the continent of africa as to

some other. yes, we constantly call the third country uh for some reason, but we forget that these are people who are very, uh, striving for progress, because well, excuse me, if not the country, the entire periodic table yes, but the people who work on the earth are people who work for themselves and this one, uh, this trip led by the president of the republic of belarus, is not only at the highest level, uh, the solution of agreements, because more than 20 treaties have been concluded, but this is actually a breakthrough breakthrough of our science of our technology of medicine education. you look how much energy. how many ministers were in this delegation a breakthrough not only, uh, to this country? in general , it is surprising to the african continent that even this atmosphere of negotiations. look , i don’t know what alexander grigorievich is doing with them, but these leaders are in different

parts of china, india, right now, a day is passing in zimbabwe, they communicate, and we hear. uh, zimbabwe's first person calls brother of the belarusian president. that is, these are different cultures on different continents, but somehow it happens very quickly. here is the president of zimbabwe himself, there is some kind of chemistry between them, because our president does not flirt with anyone, does not make empty promises, and he speaks as it is. uh, you know, probably, there is not such a large number of politicians. yes, who can tell the truth, that is, in this, of course, of course, and the president speaks. he says that if you follow the lead, this is what will happen to you. that's it what happens. now where the warriors go. yes , he openly talks about it, he himself is silent. in general, when we say africa, we understand that especially today this is the place where geopolitical interests converge. you are from different countries. here are our interests there, where, as you can see, this trip is what you paid attention to in the first place. well,

the president once said that we have no geopolitical ambitions. we have geopolitical interests, if we are talking about certain global geopolitical interests. they coincide with the goals of that civilizational the camps we have chosen we are a military-political ally of the russian federation we strive to join the shanghai cooperation organization binds us, using the definition of chinese colleagues, all weather strategic friendship with the people's republic of china. here, proceeding from this e we proceed in a global context. here we are in favor of a multipolar world on the other hand, our local interests presuppose progress. e, means belarusian exports to various countries of the world. we export more than 60% of that products that we produce for us. this is just a life survival strategy for the republic of belarus and in this regard, of course, having the russian market, nevertheless, we strive to diversify supplies and maintain trade relations with a large number of states in the world more than 180

states have trade contacts with the republic of belarus and in africa our strategy is again in the proposal of projects of mutually beneficial cooperation. when we develop and we are here we realize our tasks of promoting export. and our partners receive the necessary equipment and technology. i want to say that, for example, the minsk tractor plant delivered this in the period from 2018 to 2022. uh, in the same zimbabwe, uh, that means, about 1800. uh, units, equipment, and last year, uh, it means zimba for the first time in the last 50 years of its sovereign history provided itself with grain, it is obvious that there is also a contribution from the republic of belarus here is our country is a key partner for zimba in the implementation of a rather ambitious national program. rural economy, yes, as you rightly said, africa is not only, of course, the problems of poverty or there, er, various local armed

conflicts, which, by the way, are largely stimulated by external players who want to fish in this troubled water. it is also the fast-growing markets of the fast-growing economies of many countries over the past 15 years. here in the list of fast-growing economies , african countries constantly appear. in this regard, the women gradually stabilize their economic situation. there some time ago watched with difficulty naturally are of interest to us. we also help this country to extract minerals. we 've been working with them for quite some time now. we are in this sense here is the visit of the president. it's kind of like this. here. uh, a good result, the crown of long-term cooperation is that even viktor vladimirovich started his projects there as a sheen. i also wanted to add something about your remark about the fact that the leaders are different states. lukashenka knows how to build relationships with strong subjective leaders who are masters in the good sense of this

words in their country, which is guided by the primacy of national interests with such politicians, regardless of religious races and ideological differences. we find a common language. so it would be suga chavez, so we have president zimba with erdogan with russian president putin with the chinese leader , earth sits with people who themselves are responsible for their words. they expect the same from their partners, which is why lukashenka is here. in this case, i really found myself a friend and brother nangago known in american in the american continent, he also has a nickname corresponding in political circles to a crocodile. that is, this is a principled man, a veteran of the anti-colonial movement. here, of course, are the messages of the belarusian president and political and proposals in the field of business cooperation. what did they find understanding there, and what did africa president think for us the day before, answering questions from journalists on this topic? and he spoke very clearly. let's listen without

africa there can be no prospects in the world. in general, here are the resources. there are people here. here people every year become more and more educated the latest technologies come here, the world cannot develop without africa, therefore we are our friends here. we came to friends, wherever you were in africa, uh, in whatever country you were? whoever i date, they are our friends. we negotiate with them in the name of our peoples. we have never agreed, we do not agree between the other two third countries at the initiative of my friend. we discussed the issue of cooperation yesterday. e zimba of belarus and mozambique, you are the largest country nearby, coastline 1.000 km, agricultural country requires huge investment in agriculture. we

already have experience and the president says this is my friend the president. e of mozambique and we will soon discuss how to transfer our experience of zimba belarus to mozambique. we go in peace. we are not going the way the colonial-colonialists once went, the way they captured and exploited the people. we bring technologies here and we teach people here these technologies. well, here is an absolutely extremely clear substantive look at what is happening on a partner who is now called the belarusian president's brother. this suggests that, in principle, we can plan long-term. uh, interaction on this region. pyotr petrovsky joined us , but for now, let's give the opportunity to take a breath alexander ivanovich but we are one way or another we are now leaving this topic and see what the president said about this. but they forgot the africans, they forgave these

centuries of apartheid genocide that the belgians from the congo did what france did there in algeria in libya, but the british, of course. that's now when they line up on this vast and we understand very well the very diverse african continent external contacts. they take into account what has been decades and centuries, in principle, continues one way or another. now we see that the african continent in many of its areas is turning into a testing ground for medicines, and social structures are tribes. it's not just that they appear here. how do you see it? today we will say so colonialism, then rather, these genes at the gene level of africans at the gene level. name me a country in africa that was not a colony, well, conditionally, only south africa can be called well, that's all. everything, the rest, all were colonies, and today, when there is a withdrawal, even a mass withdrawal, let's say so. eh, well,

the collective west from africa, we are seeing this in the burkins acs pagan in other countries. here, uh, in general, the nation- states that have been created. they are trying. uh, let's say to push out the bases, including, basically, there are a lot of french military bases. here it is at this level. naturally, this will happen. but the fact that they remember it and know it, of course, it will be for many generations. this history is already inscribed in them, it is inscribed forever. story. otherwise, you won’t go there, but today the day generally turns out to be such a picture that, if in general the global, so to speak , recession issues are observed in the economy, very well, with the main serious ones, then the development of the world economy will just go only today, only for account of african countries. they develop, they want to develop, and here in this a big role is played by

plays today. russia china and today. i hope belarus is even. there will be on its feet will deal with this issue issue. only one always remains. what will they pay for? well then, let's remember the old picture of barter. well , in general, they have something to pay for. they have to pay off. they have resources and these resources, including rare earth material. therefore, we need to eat at what expense, how and where to go and develop . peter we are talking about colonialism in africa, and he acquired, if he directly says so somewhere in the sixties and seventies of a new form, the so-called non-colonialism, the basis of which is not an equivalent exchange, that is, france what to do with its former colonies involved them in some kind of currency unions, where france determines

moreover, until recently, france dominated the entire monetary policy of these countries in terms of mining some of the rare earth metals and not only rare earth metals. what do we see from the visit of the president of belarus to zimbam, which the president of belarus proposed zimbab is an equivalent exchange. that is, we are tractors for you. we give you the modernization of agriculture, and in return after the modernization of agriculture. you will provide yourself with food, including food for us. m-th agricultural goods at least, which we cannot produce under objective climatic conditions the second moment. we provide you with, uh, mining equipment. you will provide us with the raw materials that we need, including for import substitution and in electronics, including, that is, we

we see a completely new philosophy of relations, where the african partner. this is not, uh, an errand boy, when everything is sucked out of him as much as possible and nothing is given to him in return and then they ask. why such rich soils such a climate cannot provide food for african states. and this is becoming a real partner. africa is the second continent in the world, there is one and a half billion people and, most importantly, a dynamic population. if europe and even already asia sags a little, the african continent shows quite good dynamics. ukraine is now turning into a colony ukraine may not be turning into a classic african colony . it turns into a latin american quasi-state of the type, when external management is criticized and complete hmm complete

dependence on technological technological currency, otherwise, uh, fetters the leadership and makes it virtually puppet. this is what we see today, generally correct. these concepts of colonialism today should be transferred to the existing agenda, for example, to compare with ukraine or, in principle, such a narrative incorrect and should be discarded. well, of course, at the level, probably, of official diplomacy. uh, you should choose an expression, as for the level of let's say, expert publicists of politicians, then there is a lot of freedom for maneuver, allowing you to call a spade a spade, if the state provides itself with tax customs revenues only by 25%, and 75% of the budget is formed at the expense of foreign loans subsidies subsidies, other forms of payments, if the armed forces e wage war solely on the basis of deliveries of foreign weapons technology and

they themselves declare that they are protecting the interests of the military-political bloc, which they do not belong to. well, how is it, otherwise we can call it because they no longer talk about the fact that they protect the interests of ukraine in general in fact. if you look, uh, here's the current conflict in terms of the declared interests of the supporters. in fact, we are talking about the fact that the war began after the west rejected russia's proposal for a security guarantee key e, the key thesis of these proposals was that it was necessary for the west of the russian federation to agree to ukraine that ukraine would not be a member of nato. that is, we can say that these tens of thousands, and some say hundreds of thousands of losses, are the ukrainian armed forces of the ukrainian people. they are, well, simply. uh fell. uh. now she said that it would be nice to take ukraine into nato to harm russia, now you understand, this decision will be made

or not taken depending on the situation on the line of contact today day. there is no need to accept ukraine to nato for the simple reason that this will force the west to use the so-called fifth article of the charter of the north atlantic alliance and enter into a direct military confrontation with the russian federation, their military-political thought is based on the postulate that one cannot be drawn into a direct military channel of the german foreign ministry which will remind not just a girl not just even wrote to some party. this is the head of the foreign ministry of the largest european power declares nato is waging war against russia very simply it means that de facto nato is waging war against russia, which means supplying ukraine with equipment and weapons and sending there the so-called hybrid formations, which have no formal relation to the armed forces of the countries of the north atlantic alliance but in fact consist of e, former military personnel

who are or terminated their contract. or they use the cover legend in order to mean to fight on the territory of ukraine, that is. e, ber god, in principle, called a spade a spade. here, yes, and the fifth article is not needed and in a direct military confrontation. they don't get involved anymore . we know that trade relations between russia and the countries of the north atlantic alliance are maintained, moreover , gas is pumped through the territory of ukraine and there are no military actions. so, here, uh, this segment of the energy, let 's say, cooperation is not affected. it’s not ukrainian radical nationalists, nazis, and so on, which means they don’t encroach on the safety of this pipe. well, somehow in russia this topic is also being discussed by colleagues. i'm talking about the colony i’m conveying what a lot of people are saying, and those who are connected with ukraine are not in order to offend the already humiliated

ukraine now, here is dmitry evgenievich and when we see these terrible photographs, we will not show them on principle, so that she will see it here when that's all, leaving the battlefield for something, trying to hide that foreign mercenaries are fighting there with pipes of their hands and heads, but this is wildness. it's like these tribal wars in africa, because you don't have to think about these colo. stories that there were, but it's terrible. i think for the red cross this is also a headache for the global organization. what to do? from this, well, do not know the humanitarian situation, the humanitarian situation. there we have been talking for a long time about the fact that there is a humanitarian catastrophe there, but in fact, these uh, some separate ones, you can’t even call troops, because such a soldier will never do some sort of formation of absolutely incomprehensible people, uh who do such things with their dead, it doesn’t matter what they do with the prisoners. yes, it's not at all what limits do not fit. and this, of course,

goes beyond the understanding of humanity in general. and this should definitely be further investigated, what the russian federation is talking about now, because there should be respect. there is a convention, the usual normal swiss convention for the treatment of prisoners. yes, and what happens sometimes. it just goes beyond the understanding of the human. attention, in general, what about tanks, as a military expert, alexandrovich i ask you a lot more times they talk about leopards about abrams, but on the other on the other hand, we see that biden played schultz. he promised he said, i'm abrams and the leopards, he went. and in the end, now the americans are strange, they say that it’s good, if we transfer abramets by the end of the year, and how significantly this can affect how it proceeds. uh, the operation in ukraine, she was silent, the special time of the operation of the ukrainian armed forces was somewhere around 2.850, tanks on the move. that's because there was how much it was repaired

there, but it was already removed from conservation. e in the process of going these things to date. uh, it's thought to be somewhere around 150. they've got tanks left. but basically it’s a t-72b3 here and uh, or solid. this is what has been transferred, poland poland has transferred the tanks most of all, and today we can say, so 200 of these 40,250 tanks, which will be handed over to the ukrainian armed forces. they won't change the situation. they will create difficulties. yes, this is a rather difficult target to hit and, let's say, of the order, somewhere around 4-5 you need points to hit one tank, this is a heavy tank t-72 - this is a medium tank, there are about 45-47. leopard sixty-two 63, well, depending on armament and armor, up to 60 m. that's pretty

, let's say, e complex, and in electronic terms , weapons and training, they could not master it. well , training here will take at least 2. months, this will change, that's the fundamental picture. i said no, well, the difficulties for the russian expressed forces will not create the question that if they scatter them, let's say, along the entire front line. they are nothing at all if they create some kind of tank armor fists. for the offensive, she is also zaporozhye, like them want. that's it, it's going to be quite a difficult target for a very interesting episode. now it has happened. we see that the united states recently said that they are ready to use any means to protect south korea , including nuclear weapons, and in this case they saw how offended the ukrainians were. what kind of ukraine nobody promised to use

nuclear weapons? or at least scare them somehow, and for south korea i’m ready to write with peter why such injustice is quoted south korea, together with israel, is allies of the united states of america in nenatu and therefore the united states has its own military base there and seeing, certain hmm uh, certain activity of the dprk, and the activity uh, it should be admitted, uh, quite successful when dprk drones can fly uh over the palace of the president of the republic of korea yes , this is the reason only in kandera or all - this is also an attack from china, uh, including from china, because the dprk is an ally of the people's republic of china and the dprk would never have done such actions without consultation with china, moreover, it follows consider this whole situation together with taiwan. china tells the united states of

america that if pandora opens around taiwan, then pandora opens around south korea, because a peace truce of some kind between the dprk and south korea has not been signed or organized, so there are two cases that will start to operate one together with the other and americans. making such statements. it is said that they are allegedly ready to raise whether it is certain that the front is thus gradually transferred there to the south asian region. i leave ukraine in that the form in which it is now present not yet. e in my opinion, at the same time, you need to understand that, nevertheless, the main strategic adversary in the united states of america is not russia china, e, the russian federation is interpreted as yurin suret. that is, this is a current strategic threat, an adversary, the people's

republic of china, an adversary that is throwing a serious challenge to american gigionism in the field of economics. and much of what is happening in europe now must also be interpreted in the context of the confrontation between the united states and china here the united states of america seeks to gain full political military economic control over the european union. it will be strengthened at the expense of its resources, which in the future, according to the plan of american strategists, should allow them to make a technological breakthrough and defeat china in the competition in the field of the artificial intelligence economy. and so on. it is in this context that this war should be considered. naturally. in this regard. they will create tension in china and the direction of the korean exactly in the direction of taiwan and that was the visit of the pilose. now we see that a new means head of the north american congress is planning to visit about the country of touch. yes, i'm a provocation. it is clear there that, on the domestic political front in china, this will also be played out with various kinds of

american forces that are there. so, how to incite on the one hand. uh, leadership, china to some decisive action on the other hand to reproach the softness of the leader. we have already seen all this. well, this is important. here's another thing not to forget, the united states of america is the only power that has experience in using nuclear weapons. it's not for testing purposes. that is, they used nuclear weapons against the civilian population of japan, and military expedient with this demonstration. it seems yes, militaristic japan was approaching its decline by this time . japan's defeat. it was only a matter of time. here, uh, quantity. it is the civilians who died, not the military. this is a huge tragedy in the history of mankind, which, by the way, is hushed up and american strategic documents allow the use of nuclear weapons repeatedly, the united states of america simulated various kinds of exercises, where it was supposed to use nuclear weapons against the soviet union, then against russia, and by the way, uh, uh, one of these

exercises, which was cited during the years of the obama condensation, was written by the north american press among the targets that they intended to hit there was the republic of belarus, and eh , uh, in general, the idea was that russia was attacking the baltic countries, uh, the states, in response. this means that protective measures are used to inflict a nuclear defeat on russia. here the republic of belarus does not participate in these offensive actions of russia a. it's just, as it were, receiving nuclear strikes, as an ally of the russian federation, that is, you see, by and large. the only thing that means protection from this kind of aggressive aspirations is to strengthen their armed forces, returning to the issue of weapons to ukraine. china very clearly indicates how it sees the situation, which means that the us’s weak energy is quoting the biggest initiator of the ukrainian crisis, if they really care about the ukrainian people, it’s worth stop deliveries weapons. here is the attitude to this

issue. and in parallel, baidy began his election campaign the other day and said that if he had been president, the war would not have started this first. and secondly, even now he said that it is easy to achieve peace, it is easy. come on trump, listen to your weakness and incompetence joe biden has brought us to the brink of world war iii. we are on the brink of a third world war. if anyone does not know, as president, i will bring peace through force. peace through the power of what has never happened before if i were the president of the war between russia and ukraine would not even now, despite the huge loss of life and the destruction of most of the country. i would make a peace agreement within 24 hours right now could make a peace agreement of force. yes, maybe they

have repeatedly seen in the east. this we have seen repeatedly, how peace was brought. yes , by force. ah, to iraq, to ​​libya, to other countries that have now ceased to simply exist, so you know, honestly, i don’t want to believe, i don’t want to believe either one spoken word, because the world never brings peace through force, or if they do, it is somewhat different and not at all from this side. definitely not the person you want to believe. while it's interesting that he's in this campaign, first, look at the statements that are being made. yes, this is also an indicator on the other hand. look at the second moment. he decided to stand up for traditional values ​​and made a similar statement. literally the day before, the side created only two sexes, and then trump promised to stop the racists and i quote perverts who stretch their hands to children. we are going to defeat the cult of gender ideology. this after all suggests that, not so much

from the ramp. how much about the fact that the poor, of course, for these words, but he probably relies well on the study of the number of americans for whom both the situation with ukraine and the situation with gender experiments are not the norm. well, firstly, uh, it really takes place like uh in the west, they say what culture wars are, but we must understand that some political technologists are the same american westerners consider these inflated cultural wills of war to be purposeful actions in order to move the electorate away from real pressing problems. moreover, we should not mix the value-based traditional value of all rhetoric with geopolitics, do not forget that he also talks about traditional value. and thirdly, uh, in principle, trump's policy and biden's policy

are very similar. trump wanted to put europe on his oil and gas needle dram, biden. it made the only difference that trump had a strategy. uh, like this a sharp e sharp fight with china straight without any ukrainian case that he was not interested in, and biden plays a more complex game with biden. behind him are a transnational company, primarily of a financial nature. and behind the trump are, first of all, raw materials industrialists, uh, for whom it is in many ways more profitable for them to just hit china, people shouldn’t build, that the republican will change. uh, the publication's democracy will definitely change the american economy the american forms their foreign policy in two different camps. uh, just oh himself paints himself in different colors in values ​​in some strokes of geopolitics, but the strategy

is one to consolidate. this is the greatness, uh, the united states, which they are gradually losing, that here such a version and not a version cannot be overlooked, perhaps even the main current scenario of the war in ukraine in the sense that it is not ukraine that is needed here for something. ukraine is needed only to weaken europe, you know what processes are going on in europe , respectively, uh, a sharp rise in the cost of resources for an industrialist is already unprofitable to work in europe for many many they are transferred precisely to the usa where energy resources are 3-4 times cheaper, you can imagine, so when, in general, the americans achieve their goals and europe weakens, she will not need ukraine. they will simply forget it, meanwhile ukraine does not refuse the diploma. such ways we remember last week, the president, as if carefully, casually said that the ukrainians, the

ukrainian side is addressing proposals for a non-aggression pact. and here we see what, well, the resonance caused by these words, because some people comment differently, see one thing uh in these words, others other. we see that the poles were very frightened. they don't guess the edition speech. the commonwealth writes that kiev is trying to establish a dialogue with minsk, ignoring the marginal opposition, and many experts agree that the west is trying to say through poland that not all provocations. the ukrainians are still exhausted. and it would be necessary to involve belarus in this conflict, so the factor of ukraine cannot be written off. what diplomatic negotiations with pavlovich should be taken seriously. uh, the willingness of ukrainians to solve problems through diplomatic means belarus does not need to conclude any special bilateral acts. because we do not plan to attack anyone again, the constitution of the republic of belarus, adopted in its

article 18, specifically states that our country does not wage an aggressive war with its territory, therefore, our neighbors have nothing to fear and it does not make sense to offer us certain solutions. so, why has ukrainian rhetoric changed, firstly, you need to understand that ukraine is now, uh, asking for an additional volume of weapons equipment, because he is planning a so-called counter-offensive in order to cut the land corridor from the crimea e. to the donbass region in this regard. naturally, the presence on the territory of belarus of a certain russian military grouping, the regional group of the union state of the belarusian armed forces, performs the function of shackling some of the human resources of ukraine with which there are already not many, since people have to be forcibly taken away by the armed forces. by the way, by the way, i'll say cynically, but i don't see it. that's if we're on the moral side let's take a human question, then, of course, this is

very bad, terrible. now, if we take the issues of solving the military problem, then, in essence . eh, all methods. in this case they are justified. so ukraine is forced to resort to forced mobilization. this is another mobilization wave. and in the same conditions, about 20,000 grouping. they are holding. so in the belarusian direction, of course, they would like to receive some guarantees from our government. this does not mean at all that ukraine, e, has stopped its unfriendly policy towards belarus that they gave us the arrested property worth about a billion, disbanded paramilitaries from belarusian extremists. there, according to our ministry of internal affairs, about 200 people are united in some kind of terror battalions there. there, this kalinovsky is still there, some means a bow, the formation of this also does not occur. today is hosting a combat training event their public speakers hedgehog. he spoke about the fact that they plan to transfer the war to the territory of the republic, belarus, so we simply believe that this

another military trick, as it was a military trick, as it suddenly turned out. uh, the signing of the minsk agreements, which was later announced by merkel aland and ukrainian president poroshenko johnson, you understand this is some kind of specific culture. now it is political, when it is customary to sign international treaties in advance, knowing that you are not going to comply with them, and then also be proud of the perfect maximum. really. now johnson said that the norman fa- format was a screen, that is, he repeated the narratives and merkel and alanda and, well, poroshenko it is clear and why they burn the last bridges so that diplomacy can work accurately and will start working sooner or later anyway. well, it will start working if, of course, military luck falls on the pike scales, everything will be decided. in my opinion, in the theater of operations. they are out there somewhere. as for belarus, it is quite clear that after the failure of the color revolution

in 2020, after the failure of the sanctions policy against our country. it's already a task intended to destroy the economy. means to cause here social upheavals hunger riots, the so-called and subsequently introduced. it means that their marian who also did not happen , it is clear that belarus is economically holding on. yes , we have lost something in the economy. well, next year, even according to their forecasts, a gradual recovery growth is predicted. we have found new partners. we have strengthened interaction with russia in general, but we have not succeeded. they piled up. here is a plot against the president of the creation attempt. here are some completed partisan structures also failed. this is where it begins again. here is an old dance with a tambourine and, of course, they hope that he will be able to inflict. uh, the military defeat of russia is incomplete yes, but one that would cause serious unrest in russian society, destabilization processes, when russia would

not be up to belarus offers, so i think all this , that this is, uh, another game means in order to mislead official minsk well, as for peace initiatives, we are always open to them. i repeat our constitution our national anthem the whole character of our defense policy and foreign policy. he says that belarus is not going to fight with anyone. we don’t need to sign anything for a couple of minutes, we’ll take a break, after which we will continue our conversation. we continue our conversation. so smoothly, approaching the fact that some conclusions can be drawn from what is happening here, if we outline the main points along which now the formator along which the world is moving, let's scale the conversation a little bit against the backdrop of the next coven of globalists in davos. ah. for some reason, people here remembered the soros article for the ninety-third year. and now i look in a variety of accounts and accounts and posts, they recall this article. hmm, which belongs to the billionaire oligarch soros

. it means that he writes there, but writes like the inhabitants of the eastern europe can be used as a labor force in future conflicts to reduce the number of deaths in western countries, according to soros. the west will not suffer a loss in manpower, unlike the east and europe, and next to it there is still a black one, this is the founder of the media corporation. nan who loves this idea very much and once again emphasized it for the common good, it is necessary to destroy 2 billion. a person communicates to say that this idea is not new for him in the ninety- sixth year. he enlightened him for the first time. he he voiced this and now regularly returns to this topic. just recently, in new york, he delivered such a speech. we need depopulation. i'm not talking about getting rid of anyone here reported, he was present at the meeting. i have five children myself, but one in four people in the world does not get enough food. and without

access to good water, it is unreasonable to expect that we can continue to live like this, and there is too much material to end with words. that's what dmitry evgenievich is. it's just like uh already people call materials, yes, or, uh, bags. yes? uh-huh that's just expressed, as many black bags as possible. yes, excuse me, as few black bags as possible from the side of the taz, yes. naturally. uh, this policy is absolutely clear, and we see that since 2011. e after the twin towers. uh, in america, the hands were free to aggressively pursue their military policy on other continents, other countries, and uh, this is such a policy. from the nato side they understand that we can test new weapons. we we can dictate our terms. we can

pump out resources, we can put our people at the head, and this or that government of this or that country, which is important to us at the moment, yes, without resorting to anything on our part. we lived as we live. we only win. we're giving back, uh, weapons. yes, why poland handed over their tanks to everything, because, well, he has old tanks. they are now counting on leopold's new technique in the same way, because they supposedly bled themselves out. yes, uh, nato is giving away everything it doesn't need. guys you only fight, you only fight, because no one counts in you. you are humus. you have worked out the material, even if you are still living and fighting, you have already worked out the material, and any country should understand this. belarus ukraine kazakhstan this is just material for nato if they need it in

2020. remember, he said that this is the territory. it's all gray, a zone, that is, because it was good for separate people to fight in these territories, because the war is not going on on the territory. nato is not needed not on the territory, none of the nato countries. it goes on the middle side with the russian federation. yeah , they also considered the republic of belarus in the same way if we did not receive real support and protection from the russian federation, we would not have resisted under it, we would have had the same thing here. i think we need to remember more. the theory of the so-called golden billion. she fits in very well. here in all these words specifically the golden billion here is 2 billion, but there is a theory of the golden billion usa canada and western central europe and japan australia this is the golden billion, which consumes 86%. all planetary resources 86%. but there is another verification. this is

the theory of the golden billion. this is what is calm on our earth on our planet. let's say that it can be fully provided for, only 1 billion people can live this is stupid, but the question immediately arises. where are the other six? yes, well, they are already carrying out calculations. well, they say, by the end of the year, even eight are already eight. yes, yes, yes, that's the situation what arises and this theory of the golden billion. they are firmly entrenched in political casting. still, i will not do everything in order to support her; i absolutely agree with alexander sechansky. eh, you see, this is the theory of the golden billion. and in general, er, it means the perception of one's own civilization as a kind of messianic one. it has always been, starting with the crusades, ending with the slave trade, which means nazism is not an invention after all.

e africa latin america slavic peoples of the world by force they constantly carried. light, that means they taught correctly to believe in god it means that they expanded their living space and created it, that means the race of superhuman superhumans . now, it means that they explain what democracy is to all other peoples, and after all. this is not the only turner, he will remember the head of european diplomacy of the barrel who imagined what europe means a flowering garden, which means that around the jungle they really see the world like that, you understand? you see, he has five children. uh-huh and he says that it's impossible, but every fourth person in the world is starving. i mean, it's not a lot of thorns with your family eating. uh-huh. you're all unnecessary people here, and it would be nice to get rid of you. that kind of thinking is clauschwap. see what they write. well, it's simple. well, if it’s to be

said in simple terms, it’s a racist and satanists, social darwinists, enemies of the human race, sometimes they just say, fuck you to hell. this is. here is the story from this opera or not in one . - got distracted. now, to the indignation of muslims about the burning of the koran, this is absolutely unacceptable, and such things, therefore outrage is absolutely justified. but we see that on the territory of ukraine now there is a mockery of orthodoxy. just recently, in one of the temples , putin was expelled, as they said, with a disco in costumes of the devils of the temples of the ukrainian orthodox church. let's see how this happened. yes, here we have here, and or, for example, the blows that occurred now in so hit the temple with pha-hamars , is this all from this opera, or are these completely different cases. i would go even deeper here. here is alexander pavlovich demonstrated an attempt to change

human anthropology, human nature, that is, and uh, change the understanding of the family to change the understanding of value, but on the other hand, how does this tactic happen? yes , the protestant church has already been broken, see the female priesthood, homosexuality and other things are trying to break the catholic church in rome from the inside. the structure of the orthodox church is quite complex, because 15 autocephalous churches, in order to change something , some dogmatics, it is necessary to organize some kind of all-orthodox cathedral. and you look, after all, the patriarchate of constantinople, which, as many experts say, has been subordinated in many respects to american foreign policy since the forties, is trying to organize a pan-orthodox council, but so far it has not been possible, because the largest orthodox church, the most conservative one, is the russian orthodox church

, everyone gathered around it practically non-greek churches , and plus one greek patriarchate of jerusalem, and they have a strategy now to make these schismatic autocephalous churches signs under their control. and through here these churches promote the transformation, the dogmatism of the introduction of homosexuality. e female priesthood. these are all rhetoric in orthodox and orthodox dogma, so what is happening in ukraine today is a hmm testing ground. including a religious step, such a next step will be the recognition of other autocephalous churches. uh, the split of orthodoxy is a collection of these modernists, and then what is the ultimate goal, and then subjugation to the ultimate goal, orthodoxy is quarreling with this ideology of harari so that it

fits completely. here, uh, in theory and golden billion in theory. eh, the admission of a person to any technology, because that 's when we talked about the questions of the golden billion. here is the second question of admitting a person to certain digital technologies. the dictatorship of the genetic dictatorship, when modern medical technology give the opportunity to those who have the means and money to change their genome to polish, as many say, and others. eh, here's the rest of the not golden billion to live. uh, like in a colony, like, uh, to some kind of slave class, uh, on the periphery of human society then the main question arises in such a complex world, which is through the media through our colleagues. i don't know if my colleagues started me feeling that we perceive our own ethics and task in different ways. and i mean those who are on different sides of the information war, but

all over this world. what is the way of the belarusian? that is, here we are to what from what we must go. we are the path of a sovereign independent state, which, together with its allies and partners, came out against this unipolar unjust world, where there is no equivalent exchange, where the division into higher and lower into those who have everything and those who have nothing we opposed this if the west is called the free world. yes , only free for the elect, then we must be a fair world for all . here for today. just purely

geopolitically, even either we or they, and this will continue until we win, here i can not do from the thought that some part of our viewers. basically. i think that on youtube on the internet, but at this moment they will think that we, as propaganda, are laying down some kind of special narrative, which, as they usually say, divert attention from the fact that there are internal issues, and confuse it into conspiracy theories. now the quarrel has been brought up on purpose. but how to overcome, is it necessary to overcome this nihilism, which is very often artificial absolutely yes, in order to create communication noise, and so that an important the idea did not reach the addressee dmitry evgenievich how do you look at it? we definitely need to react to this very clearly and very clearly and understandably. because, uh, naturally. uh, those messages in the form of soros. you see all the other comrades. uh, in quotation marks they are uh, we

see what it leads to and we must talk about it, and we must take a clear position correctly. here, uh, colleagues said that we were speaking. an ally of the russian federation we stood up for the truth, we are not shy and are not afraid to say what is happening there and what we we will never cross over to the other side, because after passing e, all hardships. having passed the second world war, having passed the genocide of the belarusian people, yes, now start dancing. uh, ass in front of someone, how does? ukraine well, in ukraine, so many people died during the second world war, when the nazis simply destroyed and now you go out with these flags. well, what does it say? do you honestly understand? it would just be very sad for me to be born in this country where my

parents received non-human decisions, as children during world war ii where my grandfathers died. where familiar relatives were in the camps in the same way and went through such hardships and then to see how these same descendants come around you and tell you how to do it. yes, never live let the belarusian in this world. what is a good question put really always there and we do not criticize. they have the right to such a point of view such an unbeliever thomas, yes, who is sitting somewhere at home on the couch, which means that i suck on the lollipop. and that everything is told here, it means that you tell me right here. explain why the salary is not like switzerland why do i need all these times of your shmoros and so on, well, firstly. what did you not tell the truth quarrel with this did not speak.

yes? find on the internet, yes, the second question. they do not have a directed influence on international relations and on individual sovereign countries, including in our state there is another famous interview of the same quarrel, where he quite specifically says that yes, i provoke political crises in different countries in order to he kindly earns on them, well, right, that is, as he said. eh, classic yes, although it's not marx, it's marx just borrowed the phrase. now, if the case is in the mouth of interest on profits, there is no such crime that capital does not commit, this must be understood. that's natural. eh, understanding the international context in which we are in no way distracts us from domestic problems, on the contrary, it allows us to look at these problems in a different way. here are some of these problems caused by objective external factors, well, let's say, here's why they are like switzerland’s seventh-year salary, the kid’s country is developing saying that it’s not entirely correct to compare switzerland and

belarus yes, switzerland, which has not faced a military threat since the 19th century, and belarus, which, thank god, is after the end of world war ii. yes, they directly survived the catastrophe of the collapse of the soviet union , which, in its consequences, was probably no less painful than great. patriotic war. it's just that direct . there were no such tragedies, but it was a life tragedy of individual people. how many died, how many were born in the representative to calculate, because since the ninety-seventh year, our states have been in the international context for you. and now, under sectoral sanctions, someone is thinking. how much strength it costs to sell, let's say potash fertilizers from belarus, which they blocked , blocked our access to the sea, blocked banking operations by a partner, our partner is threatened with sanctions, confiscation of assets. here their world is based on the correct supposedly. and of course, we will oppose the rules together with those states that also adhere to the primacy of the sovereign

right of peoples to determine their future in the future multipolar world, of course, uh, any state model will have the right to life, if this state model is supported by the sovereign choice of society. here's how, and not at all some kind of universalist. uh, universalist rules that get pretty arbitrarily interpreted by a drunk sheriff in washington who also swings his baton from right to left, so he doesn't know who 's right? who is to blame, considering only himself, then chosen messiah. here's how, uh, quoted by you anyway. well, that won't happen. this is the path to belarus, the sovereign path, so president lukashenka leads the path for the fourth year for this. in fact, they are constantly trying to destroy it. see it doesn't work. this means that even a small country, if it has a sovereign will, has the right to exist, that is, only that revolution has the right to life. who can protect herself thank you thank you for being part

of our program today. so tnank you to our viewers for being and thinking with us for today everything.

tv channel belarus 24 broadcasts for you around the clock, do not switch our daily task to talk about belarus, country and abroad. more than 100 million viewers around the world have access to view projects. business and developing hospitable bright and festival