every week, the heroes go in search of adventure, it's worth driving 25

km from minsk, and you will have an unforgettable time in this place, skin people, how i wanted to spend. we have a rut city, they write shows. here the fish was with him to bring a stone. well, i kizmoh lifted a brush for myself, i could carry such. see who we have here. here we are. so, in my opinion, zaporozhets yes, well, here is one of the first they must complete all the tasks and complete the quest. from what word does the name of the city come from linda river name the king's daughter somehow connected with what we have decided in the legend, nevertheless, to convince visually, and the next ask me brought me here to the elevator center of culture and folk art. and what will we do with songs and stone, scissors and paper will help them, see on our tv channel. hello

, hello everyone, we continue to record ongoing events in order to identify a pattern. nosti in order to analyze how optimal our

strategy is, but also to understand. this is the direction in which the world is moving. although this, of course, is not just a very strong today composition i thank our guests for the fact that today they are waiting for peter petrovsky with us just about. he will join us and let's not waste time , let's start right away with the current belarusian delegation in africa led by the belarusian president, this is what is most important for yourself, what is the main message that you caught dmitry evgenievich for yourself, what did you pay attention to? firstly, there is always such a feeling, and the attitude of european countries to the continent of africa as to some other. yes , we constantly call the third country, but for some reason, but we forget that these are people who are very, uh, striving for progress, because , excuse me, if not the country, the entire periodic table yes, but people who work on the earth, people who work for themselves, and

this one here, uh , this trip led by the president of the republic of belarus is not only at the highest level, uh, the solution of agreements, because more than 20 agreements were concluded, but this is actually a breakthrough in our science, our technology, medicine education. you look how much energy. how many ministers were this money not only e to this country? in general, it is surprising to the african continent that even this atmosphere of negotiations. look, i don’t know what alexander grigorievich is doing with them. but these leaders in different parts of china, india, right now , a day is passing in zimbabwe, they communicate, and we hear. uh, the first person in zimbabwe calls the brother of the belarusian president. that is, these are different cultures on different continents, but somehow it happens very quickly. here is the president of zimbabwe himself, there is some kind of chemistry between them, because that e our president does not flirt with anyone does not

make empty promises, and he says, as it is. uh, you know, probably, there is not such a large number of politicians. yes, who can tell the truth, that is, in this, of course, of course, the president speaks. he says that if you follow the lead, this is what will happen to you. here's what happens. now where the warriors go. yes, he openly talks about it, in general, when we say africa, we understand that especially today this is the place where geopolitical interest. a wide variety of countries . here are our interests there, where, as you can see, this trip, what did you pay attention to first of all, the president once said that we have no geopolitical ambitions. we have geopolitical interests, if we are talking about certain global geopolitical interests. they coincide with the goals of the civilizational camp that we have chosen. we are a military-political ally of the russian federation. we strive to join the shanghai cooperation organization.

connects, to use the definition of chinese colleagues, all-weather strategic friendship with the people's republic of china. here, proceeding from this e we proceed in a global context. here we are in favor of a multipolar world on the other hand, our local interests presuppose progress. e, means belarusian exports to various countries of the world. we export more than 60% of the products that we produce for us. this is just a life survival strategy for the republic of belarus and in this regard, of course, having the russian market, nevertheless, we we strive to diversify supplies and maintain trade relations with a large number of states of the world more than 180 states have trade contacts with the republic of belarus and in africa, our strategy is again to offer projects of mutually beneficial cooperation. when we develop and we are here we are realizing our tasks to promote exports. and our partners receive the necessary equipment and technology. i want to say that, let's say, the minsk tractor

works - it was in the period from 2018 to 2022 that it delivered uh, in the same zimbabwe uh, that means uh about 1800, and units of equipment last year as well, which means that zimba for the first time in the last 50 years of its sovereign history provided itself with grain, it is obvious that there is also the contribution of the republic of belarus here, and our country is a key partner for zimbabwe in the implementation of a rather ambitious national program. agricultural organizations , yes, as you rightly said, africa is not only, of course, the problems of poverty or there, uh, various local armed conflicts, which, by the way, are largely stimulated by outside players who want to fish in this murky water. it is also the fast-growing markets of the fast-growing economies of many countries over the past 15 years. here in the list of fast-growing economies , african countries constantly appear. in this regard, the

women gradually stabilize their economic situation. there, some time ago, we observed with difficulties, which are naturally of interest to us. we also help this country to extract minerals. we 've been working with them for quite some time now. we are in it sense here is the visit of the president. it's kind of like this. here. uh, a good result, the crown of long-term cooperation is that even viktor vladimirovich started his projects there as a sheen. i also wanted to add something about your remark about the fact that the leaders are different states. well , lukashenka knows how to build relationships with strong subjective leaders who are masters in the good sense of the word in their country, which is guided by the primacy of national interests with such politicians, regardless of religious races and ideological differences. we find a common language. so it would be suga chavez so we have somers on gagwo president zimba in sardogan with russian president putin with the

chinese leader xi jinping with people who themselves are responsible for their words. they expect the same from their partners, which is why lukashenka is here. in this case, he really found a friend for himself and his brother nangago is known in the american on the american continent, he also has a nickname corresponding to a crocodile in political circles. that is, this is a fundamental uh, a veteran man, anticol colonial movement. here, of course, are the messages of the belarusian president, both political and proposals in the field of business cooperation. what did they find understanding there, and what for us is africa the president the day before, answering journalists' questions on this topic? and he spoke very clearly. let's listen without africa there can be no prospects in the world. in general, here are the resources. there are people here. every year people here are becoming more and more educated, the latest technologies are coming here, the world cannot develop without africa. therefore, we are

our friends here. we came to friends, wherever just have not been to africa, uh, in whatever country? whoever i date, they are our friends. we negotiate with them in the name of our peoples. we have never agreed, we do not agree between the other two third countries at the initiative of my friend. we discussed the issue of cooperation yesterday. e zimba of belarus and mozambique mosa. the largest country with a coastline of 1,000 km, an agrarian country requires huge investments in agriculture. we already have experience and the president says this is my friend the president. e mozambique and we're coming soon time to discuss how to transfer our experience of zimba belarus to mozambique we go in peace. we are not going the way the colonial-colonialists once went,

the way they captured and exploited the people. we bring technologies here and we teach people here these technologies. well, here is an absolutely extremely clear objective look at what is happening on a partner who is now called the belarusian president's brother. this suggests that, in principle, we can plan long-term. uh, interaction on this region. pyotr petrovsky has joined us , but for now, let's give the opportunity take a breath alexander ivanovich but we are one way or another we are now walking around this topic and see what the president said about this. but they forgot the africans, they forgave these centuries of apartheid genocide that the belgians from the congo did what france did there in algeria in libya well, the british, of course. right now, when they are lining up on this huge and we understand very well the very diverse african continent, external contacts. they take into account what was

decades and centuries, in principle, one way or another. otherwise continues. now we see that the african continent in many of its areas is turning into a testing ground for medicines, and the social structures of these tribes do not just appear here. how do you see it? today we will say so e colonialism, then. rather, these genes are at the gene level of africans at the gene level. name me a country in africa that was not a colony, well, conditionally, only south africa can be called well, that's all. everything else was all colonies and today, when there is a departure, even a mass departure, let's say so. eh, well, the collective west from africa, we are seeing this in the stormy isu pagan in other countries. here, er, in general, the nation- states that are created. they are already trying to, let's say, push the bases out , including, basically, there are a lot

of french military bases there. and at this level, of course, it will happen. but the fact that they remember it and know it, of course, it will be for many generations. it ’s already inscribed in their history, it’s inscribed forever in history, otherwise you won’t go there, but on today is the day, in general, such a picture is obtained that if, in general, the world economy, so to speak, in the economy, recession issues will be observed, very also with the main serious ones, then the development of the world economy will only proceed today only at the expense of african countries. they develop, they want to develop, and today they play a big role in this. russia china and today. i hope belarus is even. there will be on its feet will deal with this issue issue. only there is always one remains. and what will they pay? well then, let's remember the old picture of barter. well , in general, they have something to pay for. they

have they have resources and these resources, including rare land material. therefore, we need to have something at the expense of what, how and where to go and develop. we are talking about colonialism in africa, and he acquired, if he speaks so directly somewhere in the sixties and seventies of a new form, so-called neo-colonialism, the basis of which is not an equivalent exchange, that is, france what to do with its former colonies involved them in some kind of monetary unions, where france determines the entire monetary policy of these countries ; moreover, france until recently dominated in terms of mining some of the rare earth metals and not only rare earth metals. what we see from, uh, the visit of the president of belarus to the zimba, that the president of belarus offered the zimba is an equivalent exchange. that is, we are tractors for you.

we give you the modernization of agriculture, and in return after the modernization of agriculture. you provide for yourself food, including us food theme. m-th agricultural goods at least, which we cannot produce under objective climatic conditions the second moment. we provide you with, uh, mining equipment. you will provide us with the raw materials that we need, including for import substitution and in electronics as well, that is, we see a completely new philosophy of relations, where the african partner is. this is not, uh, an errand boy, when everything is sucked out of him to the maximum and does not give him anything in return and then they ask. why such rich soils such a climate cannot provide food for an african state. and

this is becoming a real partner. africa is the second continent in the world, there is one and a half billion people and, most importantly, a dynamic population. if europe and even asia are already sinking a little on the african continent , quite good dynamics are turning ukraine into a colony now ukraine may not be turning into a classic african colony . it is turning into a latin american quasi-state of such like, when external management closes down and complete hmm complete dependence technological technological currency, other, uh, fetter the leadership and make it actually a puppet. here is what we see here generally correctly. today these concepts of colonialism should be transferred to the existing agenda, for example, compared with ukraine , or, in principle, such a narrative is not rooted and should be abandoned. well, of course, at

the level, probably, of official diplomacy , one should choose an expression that concerns the level, let's say, of expert publicists politicians, then there is a lot of room for maneuver, allowing you to call a spade a spade, if the state provides itself with customs tax revenues of only 25%, and 75% of the budget is formed by foreign loans, subsidies, subsidies, other payment forums, if the armed forces war exclusively, relying on the supply of foreign equipment and weapons, and they themselves declare that they are defending the interests of the military-political bloc, which they do not belong to. well, how is it, otherwise we can call me because they no longer talk about what they protect the interests of ukraine in general, in fact , if you look, here is the current conflict from the point of view of the declared interests

of supporters. in fact, we are talking about the fact that the war began after the west rejected russia's proposal for security guarantees . we can say that these tens of thousands, and some say hundreds of thousands losses, that's the ukrainian armed forces of the ukrainian people. they are, well, simply. uh, palisa said that it would be nice to take ukraine into nato to spite russia, now you understand, this decision will be made or not taken depending on the situation on the line of contact today. there is no need to accept ukraine into nato for the simple reason that it would force the west to invoke the so-called article 5 of the charter of the north atlantic alliance and enter into a direct military confrontation with the russian federation, their military-political

thought is based on the postulate that it is impossible to be drawn into the direct military channel of the german foreign ministry, which will remind you not just a girl , not because they even wrote to some party. this is the head of the foreign ministry of the largest european power declaring nato is waging war against russia , it means very simply that de facto nato is waging war against russia, which means supplying ukraine with equipment and weapons and sending there so -called hybrid formations that have no formal relation to the armed to the forces of the countries of the north atlantic alliance, but in fact they consist of uh former military personnel who are or have terminated their contractual relations. or they use the cover legend in order to mean to fight on the territory of ukraine, that is. e, ber god, in principle, called a spade a spade. here, and the fifth article is not needed in

direct military consultation. they don't get involved anymore. we know that trade relations are maintained between russia and the strange north atlantic alliance; moreover, gas is pumped through territory of ukraine and no military action. so, here, uh, this segment of the energy, let's say, cooperation is not affected. it’s not ukrainian radical nationalists, nazis and others, which means they don’t encroach on the safety of this pipe. well, somehow in russia this topic is also being discussed by colleagues. i'm talking about the colony. with, as it were, they convey what a lot of people say . this is connected with ukraine, not in order to offend the already lower ukraine now, here is dmitry evgenievich and when we see these terrible photographs, we show them fundamentally we won’t, because whoever saw us here when it’s all over, leaving the battlefield for something, trying to hide that foreign mercenaries are fighting there and hands and head with pipes, but this is wildness. it's like these tribal wars in africa, because you don't have

to think about these colo. the stories that were there, but it's terrible. i think for the red cross this is also a headache for the global organization. what to do? from this, well, do not know the humanitarian situation, the humanitarian situation. there we have long been talking about the fact that there exist humanitarian catastrophe, but in fact, these uh, some separate ones, you can’t even call them troops, because when a soldier like that doesn’t do some sort of formation of absolutely incomprehensible people, and who do such things with their dead , it doesn’t matter, then what they do with the prisoners. yes , it does not fit into any framework at all. and this, of course, goes beyond the understanding of humanity in general. and this should definitely be further investigated, what the russian federation is talking about now, because e there should be respect, if there is a convention, the usual normal swiss, the convention is the attitude towards prisoners, and what happens sometimes. it just goes beyond the understanding of the

human. attention, in general, what about tanks, as a military expert, alexandrovich i ask you a lot of times they talk about leopards about abrams, but on the other hand, we see that biden tricked the schultz. he promised to say, i am abrams and you are leopards, he went. and in the end, now the americans are saying that it’s good, if we hand over abramets by the end of the year, and how significant this can affect how it runs. uh, the operation in ukraine was silent, a special military operation, the ukrainian armed forces had somewhere around 2.850 tanks on the move. that's because there was how much it was repaired there, and it was removed from the saves , these things went further in the process today. uh, it's estimated that they have about 150 left there. basically, this is the t-72b3 here and or are solid. this is what

transferred, poland poland most of all transferred tanks most of all and today we can say, so 200 these 40-250 tanks, which will be handed over to the ukrainian armed forces. they won't change the situation. they will create difficulties. yes, this is a rather difficult target to hit, and let's say about four or five, you need points to hit one tank, it's a heavy t-72 there - it's a medium tank, there is about 45-47. leopard. sixty-two sixty-three, well, depending on weapons and armor up to 67 tons. that's enough. let's just say, it's complicated, and in electronic terms, weapons and training. they couldn't master it learning here would take at least 2. months it will change here is the

fundamental picture. i said no, well, difficulties for the russian expressed forces. they will also create the question that if they scatter them , let's say so, along the entire front line. they are nothing at all if they create some kind of tank armor fists. for the offensive, she , too, zaporozhye, as they want. that's it, it's going to be quite a difficult target for a very interesting episode. we see that the united states recently said that it is ready to use any means to defend south korea, including nuclear weapons, and in this case, they saw how offended the ukrainians were. what kind of ukraine nobody promised to use nuclear weapons? or at least scare them somehow, and for south korea i’m ready to write with peter why such injustice is quoted south korea , together with israel, are allies of the united states of america in non-natu and therefore the united states has its own military base there and

seeing certain hmm but a certain the activity of the dprk, and the activity e, it must be admitted, e, is quite successful when the drones of the dprk can fly e over the presidential palace of the republic of korea yes, this is the reason only for the kander, or is it still an attack from china, uh, including from china, because the dprk is an ally of the people 's republic of china and the dprk would never do such actions without consultation with china moreover, this whole situation should be considered together with taiwan. china tells the united states of america that if pandora opens around taiwan, then pandora opens around south korea, because the peace truce of some sort between north korea and south korea has not been signed, nor organized, so here are two cases

that will start to operate one together with the other and the americans. making such statements. they say that they are allegedly ready to raise certain ones, does this not mean that the front is thus gradually transferred there to the south asian region. i leave ukraine in the form in which it is now present not yet. e in my opinion, at the same time, you need to understand that, nevertheless, the main strategic adversary in the united states of america is not russia china, e, the russian federation is interpreted as yurin suret. that is, this is a current threat strategically, the enemy, the people's republic of china, is an adversary that poses a serious challenge to american gigionism in the field of economics. and much of what is happening now in europe must also be interpreted in the context of the confrontation between the united states and china. military economic control of the european union. it will increase due to its

resources, which in the future, according to the plan of american strategists, should allow them to make a technological breakthrough and defeat china in competition in the field of artificial intelligence economics. and so on. it is in this context that this war should be considered. naturally. in this regard. they will create tension in china and in the direction of korea and in the direction of taiwan, and here was the visit of the pilose. now we see that a new means the leader of the north american congress are planning to visit about the country provocation. it is clear there that, on the domestic political front in china, this will also be played out with various kinds of american forces that are there. so, how to incite on the one hand. uh, leadership, china to some decisive action on the other hand to reproach the head of the zenpin for softness. we have already seen all this. well, this is important. here's another thing to remember, the united states of america is the only power that has experience in the use of nuclear weapons. it's not for testing purposes.

that is, they used nuclear weapons against the civilian population of japan, and military expedient from this demonstration. she appears dubious. yes militaristic japan by now the defeat of japan was approaching its sunset . it was only a matter of time. here, uh, quantity. it is a huge tragedy in the history of mankind, which, by the way, is hushed up and american strategic documents allow the use of nuclear weapons repeatedly, the united states of america simulated various kinds of exercises, where it was supposed to use nuclear weapons against the soviet union, then against russia, and by the way, uh, uh, about one of these kinds of teachings that were given in the years obama's condensation was written by the north american press, among the targets that they intended to hit was the republic of belarus, and uh , uh, in general, the idea was that russia was attacking the baltic countries, uh, the states, in response. this means that protective measures are used to

inflict a nuclear defeat on russia. here the republic of belarus does not participate in these offensive actions of russia. it's just, as it were, receiving nuclear strikes, as an ally of the russian federation, that is, you see, by and large. the only thing that means protection from this kind of aggressive aspirations it is to strengthen its armed forces, returning to the question of ukraine , china is very clear about how he sees the situation. so we quote the us bitcoin as the largest initiator of the ukrainian crisis, if they really care about the ukrainian people, it is worth stopping the supply of weapons. here is the attitude to this issue. and in parallel, baidy began his election campaign the other day and said that if he had been president, the war would not have started this first. and secondly, even now he said that it is easy to achieve peace, it is easy. let's go trump let's listen to our weakness and incompetence joe biden has brought us to the brink of the third world

war. we are on the brink of a third world war. if anyone does not know, as president, i will bring peace through force. peace through force, which has never happened before. if i were president, the war between russia and ukraine would not even now, despite the huge loss of life and the destruction of most of the country. i would make a peace deal within 24 hours right now could make a peace deal peace through strength. yes, maybe they have repeatedly seen in the middle east. this we have seen repeatedly, how peace was brought. yes, by force. ah, to iraq, to ​​libya, to other countries that have now simply ceased to exist, so you know, honestly, i don’t want to

believe, i don’t want to believe a single word, because peace never brings the consequences of force, or if brings, then a little differently and not at all from this side. definitely not the person you want to believe. although it is interesting that he is in this election campaign, firstly, look at the statements they make. yes, this is also an indicator on the other hand. look at the second moment. he decided to stand up for traditional values ​​and made a similar statement. just the day before, boxing created only two genders, and then trump promised to stop the racists and i quote the perverts who stretch their hands to the children. we are going to defeat the cult of gender ideology. after all, this suggests that, not so much trump, but that the poor, of course , depends, but he probably relies well on the study of the number of americans for which both the situation with ukraine and the situation with gender experiments are not the norm. well, firstly, uh, it really takes place

like uh in the west, they say what cultural wars are, but we must understand that some political technologists, the same american western ones, consider these inflated cultural wills of the war to be purposeful actions in order to push back e, the electorate from real pressing problems, moreover, we should not confuse the value-based traditional value of all rhetoric with geopolitics we forget that he also talks about traditional value in the third place. e. in principle, trump's policy and biden's policy are very similar. trump wanted to plant dram, biden on his oil and gas needle in europe. it made the only difference that trump had a strategy. uh, such a sharp e sharp fight with china straight without some kind of

ukrainian case that he was not interested in, and biden plays a more complicated game with biden. behind him are transnational companies, primarily of a financial nature. and behind the trump are primarily industrialists raw materials producers, uh, for whom it is in many ways more profitable to just beat people in china, it’s not worth building, that the republican will change. uh, democratic republicans will definitely change the american economy the american forms their foreign policy different two camps. uh, just outline themselves drawing themselves in different. colors in values ​​in some strokes of geopolitics, but there is only one strategy to consolidate. this is the greatness of, uh, the united states, which is not lost, that such a version and not a version cannot be ignored here, maybe even the main one the current scenario of the war in ukraine in the sense that it is not ukraine that

is needed here for something. ukraine is needed only to weaken europe, you know what processes are going on in europe, respectively, it is sharp but the rise in the cost of resources for an industrialist is no longer profitable to work in europe, many are already transferring a lot to the usa where energy resources are 3-4 times cheaper, you can imagine, that's when in general -then the americans will achieve their goals and europe will weaken, it will not need ukraine. they will simply forget it, meanwhile ukraine does not refuse diplomatic these. we remember the past. for a week, the president, as if carefully, by chance, said that the ukrainians, the ukrainian side, is addressing proposals for a non-aggression pact. and here we see what kind of resonance these words caused, because some people comment differently, they see one thing, uh, in these words, others see something else. we see that the poles were very frightened. they resent the publication of the speech. the commonwealth

writes that kiev is trying to establish a dialogue with minsk, ignores the marginal opposition, and many experts agree that the west, through poland, is trying to say that not all provocations. the ukrainians are still exhausted. and it would be necessary to involve belarus in this conflict, so the factor of ukraine cannot be written off. what diplomatic negotiations pavlovich himself should be taken seriously. uh, the willingness of the ukrainians to solve the problems of belarus through diplomatic means, there is no need to conclude some special bilateral facts. the fact is that we do not plan on anyone for the

question, let's take a human, then, of course, this is very bad, terrible. now, if we take the issues of solving a military problem, then, in fact, affairs. eh, all methods. in this case they are justified. so ukraine is forced, resorting to forced mobilization. this is another mobilization wave. and in the same conditions, about 20,000 grouping. they are holding. so in the belarusian direction,

of course, they would like to receive some guarantees from our government. this does not mean at all that ukraine, e. extremists. there, according to our ministry of internal affairs, about 200 people are united in some kind of battalions there, there are terrors there, there is this kalinovsky and there, some kind of bow, the formation of this also does not occur. today is hosting a combat training event their public speakers. it is said daily that they plan to postpone the war. on the territory of the republic of belarus, therefore, we simply believe that this is another military trick, as it was a military trick, as it suddenly turned out. uh, the signing of the minsk agreements, which was subsequently announced by merkel aland and ukrainian president poroshenko is now johnson , you understand this is some kind of specific culture. now the political one, when it is customary to sign international

treaties in advance, knowing that you are not going to comply with them, and then also be proud of the completed act, he said that the normandy format was a screen, that is, he repeated the narratives of both merkel and aland and well , poroshenko understandable why they burn the last bridges so that diplomacy can work accurately. anyway, sooner or later it will start working, but it will start work in the event that it will, of course, military luck falls on the pike scales, yet everything will be decided. in my opinion, in the theater of operations. they are somewhere else here, as far as belarus is concerned. it is quite clear that after the failure of the color revolution in 2020, after the failure of the sanctions policy against our country, because the task was to destroy the economy. means to cause here social upheavals hunger riots, the so-called and subsequently introduced. means his marians, who also did not happen it is clear that belarus is economically holding on. yes , we have lost something in the economy there, but

next year, even according to their forecasts, a gradual recovery growth is predicted. we have found new partners. we have strengthened interaction with russia in general, but we have not succeeded. they piled up. here is a plot against the president of the creation attempt. here, some completed partisan structures also failed. this is where it begins again. here is an old dance with a tambourine and, of course, they hope that they will be able to inflict a military defeat on russia incomplete. yes, it is one that would cause serious unrest in russian society, destabilization processes, when russia would not be up to belarus and then, then they will take care of us and at the same time ask us to notice more when it does not offer to conclude any facts about the non-attack, so i’m all this i think that this is, uh, another game with the aim of misleading the official minsk. well , as for peace initiatives, we are always open to them. i repeat our constitution our national anthem our whole character defense policy and foreign policy. he says that belarus is

not going to fight with anyone. we don't need to sign anything for a couple of minutes, we'll take a break. then we will continue our conversation. we continue our conversation. here. smoothly, approaching to draw some conclusions from what is happening here, if we outline the main points along which the formator is now, along which the world is moving forward, we are slightly scaling the conversation against the backdrop of another coven of globalists. ah, for some reason, people remembered soros's article for the ninety-third a year and now i look in a variety of accounts and accounts and posts recall this article mm, which belongs to the oligarch billionaire soros, the name for the new world order of the future nato, but what is interesting is that it fits perfectly into the context of ongoing events. so what he writes there describes how the inhabitants of eastern europe can be used as a labor force in the coming conflicts to reduce the number of deaths in western countries, according to soros. the west will not tolerate losses in manpower,

unlike the east and europe and next to it there turner is the founder of cnn medical corp. which is very fond of this idea. and once again he emphasized it for the whole common good, it is necessary to destroy two billion people, in general it must be said that for him this idea is not new. yes, in 2006 it was illuminated for the first time. he voiced this and now regularly returns to this topic. just recently in new york about such a speech we need depopulation. i'm not talking about getting rid of anyone here reported, he was present at the meeting. i have he has five children himself, but one in four people in the world does not get enough food. and without access to good water, it is unreasonable to expect that we can continue to live like this, and there is too much material to finish with words. that's what dmitry evgenievich is. it's just that people already call materials, yes, or , uh, bags. yes? uh-huh that's how the quarrel with

spoke out, as many black bags as possible. yes, excuse me as much as possible, as little as possible, uh, black bags from nato, yes, of course. uh, this policy is absolutely clear, and we see that since 2011. e after the twin towers. uh, in america, the hands were untied to aggressively pursue their military policy. on other continents , other countries, and uh, this is such a policy on the part of nato. they understand that we can test new weapons. we can dictate our terms. we can siphon resources. we can put our people at the head, and this or that government of this or that country, which is important to us at the moment, yes, without resorting to anything on our part. we lived as we live. we only win. we give back, uh weapon. yes, why poland handed over

all of its tanks, because, well, not the old tanks, they are now counting on japan's new equipment in the same way, because they allegedly bled themselves. yes, uh, nato is giving away everything it doesn't need. guys only fight, only fight, because no one counts in you. you are humus. you have worked out the materials, even if you are still living, crawling and fighting, then you have already worked out the material, and any country should understand this. belarus ukraine kazakhstan this is just material for nato if they it will be necessary in the twentieth year. remember, he said that this is the territory. it 's all grey. the zone was singled out as a separate word. it is very good to fight in these territories, because the war is not taking place on the territory. nato is not needed on the territory, not one of the nato countries it goes on the middle side with the russian federation uh-huh, in the same way they considered the

republic of belarus, if we had not received real support and protection from the russian federation, we would not have resisted under it with us would be the same here. i think, we must also recall the theory of the so-called golden billion. she fits in very well. here in all these words specifically the golden billion. there are two billion here. well , there is a theory of a golden billion usa canada and western central europe and japan australia this is the golden billion. which consumes 86% of all planetary resources 86%. but there is another verification - this is the theory of the golden billion. it is that on our earth on our planet, let's say calmly, it can be fully provided for, only 1 billion can live. this immediately raises a question. and where to child the other six? yes? well, they are already doing the

calculations. well, they say, by the end of the year, even eight is already eight months old. here is the situation. what arises and this theory of the golden billion. they are firmly entrenched in the political elite. i will not do everything to support her absolutely. with alexander sechansky, you understand, this is the theory of the golden billion. and in general, er, it means that the perception of one's own civilization as a kind of messianic one has always been there, from the crusades to the slave trade. so nazism is not an invention after all. e africa latin america slavic peoples. they always carried a certain light. who means they taught to believe in god correctly? why did they expand? they created their own living space, which means the route from above the people

from above the gentlemen. now, it means that they explain what democracy is to all other peoples, and they are not the only ones. think back to the heads of european barrel diplomacy. imagined what does europe mean a blooming garden, then around the jungle they really see the world like that, do you understand? you see he has 5 children. uh-huh and he says it's wrong, it's one in four people in the world is starving, that is, it's not turner with his family eats a lot. uh-huh. you're all unnecessary people here, and it would be nice to get rid of you. that kind of thinking is clauschwap. see what they write. but it's simple. well, if they say so in plain language, these are racists, satanists, social darwinists, enemies of the human race, and you just need to tell them, fuck you to hell. here is the story from this opera or not in one, firstly. we we see that the media are now distracted by the indignation of muslims about the burning of the koran rightly, this is absolutely unacceptable.

uh, such things are absolutely justified by this indignation, but we see that on the territory of ukraine now there is a mockery of orthodoxy. just recently, in one of the temples, putin was expelled, as they said, with a disco in costumes of the devils of the temples of the ukrainian orthodox church. let's see how this happened. yes, here, here, we have here, and or , for example, the strikes that occurred now in vsu. it hit the temple with pha-hamars, is it from this whole opera or are they absolutely different cases. here even deeper said. so alexander pavlovich demonstrated an attempt to change human anthropology , human nature, that is, to change the understanding of the family, to change the understanding of value, but on the other hand, how does this tactic happen? yes, the protestant church has already been broken, see the female priesthood,

homosexuality and other things are trying to break the catholic church in rome from the inside. in the orthodox church, in its structure, it is enough complicated, because there are 15 autocephalous churches, in order to change something, some dogma, you need to organize some kind of all-orthodox cathedral. and you look, after all, the patriarchate of constantinople, which, as many experts say, is subordinate to american foreign policy in the forties. he is trying to organize this pan-orthodox cathedral, but so far it has not been possible, because the largest orthodox church, the most conservative one, is the russian orthodox church , all non-greek practical churches have gathered around it and plus one greek patriarchate of jerusalem and they have a strategy now to recognize these schismatic autocephalous churches under their control. and through these churches to promote the transformation,

the dogmatism of the introduction of homosexuality. e female priesthood. these are all rhetoric in orthodox and orthodox dogma, so what is happening in ukraine today is a hmm testing ground. including a religious step. what next step will be the recognition of other autocephalous churches. uh, the schism of orthodoxy is a collection of these modernists, a further on, what is the ultimate goal, and then on the ultimate goal is submission, orthodoxy, this ideology of harari quarrel, so that it fits completely. here, in theory, and a golden billion in theory. eh, the admission of a person to any technology, because that 's when we talked about the questions of the golden billion. here is the second question of admitting a person to certain digital technologies. the dictatorship of the genetic dictatorship, when

modern medical technology gives the opportunity to those who have the means and money to change their genome to polish how many say, and others. eh, here's the rest of the not golden billion to live. uh, like in a colony, like, uh, to some kind of slave class, uh, on the periphery of human society, then the main question arises in such a complex world, which is through the media through our colleagues. i don't know if my colleagues started me feeling that we perceive the ethics and the task differently. and i mean those who are on opposite sides of the information war, but all over this world. what is the way of the belarusian? that is, here we are to what from what we must go. we are the way of a sovereign independent state, which , together with its allies, partners, opposed this unipolar

unjust world, where there is no equivalent exchange, where there is a division into higher and lower into those who have everything and those who have nothing, we opposed this if the west is called the free world. yes , only free for the elite, then we must be a fair world for all . manifestation to date until the end. here for today. just purely geopolitically, even either we or they, and this will continue until we win, i can’t do it from the thought that some part of our viewers. basically. i think that on youtube on the internet, but at this moment to think that we, as propaganda, are laying down some kind of special

narrative, which, as they usually say, divert attention from the fact that there are internal issues, and confuse it into conspiracy theories. now the quarrel has been brought up on purpose. but how to overcome and is it necessary to overcome this nihilism, which is very often artificial absolutely yes, in order to create communication noise, and so that an important idea does not reach the addressee dmitry evgenievich how do you look at this? do you know for sure we should respond to this? it would be very clear and understandable. because uh, naturally, uh, those messages in the form of 40 you see all the other comrades. uh, in quotation marks they are uh, we see what it leads to and we must talk about it, and we must take a clear position is correct. here, uh colleagues, they said that we were speaking. an ally of the russian federation we stood for the truth, we are not

shy and are not afraid to say what is happening there and that we will never cross over to the other side, because after passing, uh, all the hardships. having passed the second world war, having passed the genocide of the belarusian people, yes, now start dancing. uh, ass in front of someone, how does? ukraine, well, in ukraine, so many people died during the second world war when the nazis simply destroyed and now you go out with these flags. well, what does it say? do you honestly understand? it would just be very sad for me to be born in this country, where my parents received inhuman hardships. as children during world war ii where my grandfathers died. in the familiar relatives , they were in the camps in the same way and went through such hardships and then to see how these same

descendants come around you and tell you how to do it. yes, never tin let the belarusian in this world. what is a good question ? we criticize. they have the right to such a point of view, such an unbeliever thomas, yes, who is sitting somewhere at home on the couch, which means, sucking on a lollipop, he will say, and what is being told here, then you are here for me. explain why there is no salary in switzerland why do i need all these quarrels of yours and so on? firstly. what did we tell a lie, a quarrel with this did not speak. yes? find on the internet, yes, the second question. they do not have a directed influence on international relations and on individual sovereign countries, including ours. states. after all, there is another famous interview of the same quarrel, where he quite specifically says that yes, i provoke political crises in different countries in

order to make money on them, he loves business. well, right, that is, as he said. e, classic yes, at least not marx, marx simply borrowed the phrase. now, if it comes from the mouth of profit, there is no such crime as capital, if something needs to be understood, and naturally, uh, understanding the international context in which we are in it does not distract us in any way from internal problems, on the contrary, allows you to look at these problems differently. here are some of these problems caused by objective external factors. well, let's say that's why no swiss salary. speaking about the fact that it is not entirely correct to compare switzerland and belarus yes, switzerland, which has not faced a military threat since the 19th century, and belarus, which, thank god, is after the end of the great patriotic war. yes, they directly survived the catastrophe of the collapse of the soviet union , which, in its consequences, was probably no less painful than great. patriotic war. it's just like that right there

. there were no such tragedies, but it was a life tragedy of individual people. how many died, how many they were born to imagine counting in our country in the ninety- seventh year, our state is boys, here you have an international consist, and now someone is thinking about sectoral sanctions. how much strength does it cost to sell, let's say potash fertilizer from belarus, which they blocked , blocked our access to the sea, block our partner's banking operations, threaten us sanctions confiscation of assets. here their world is based on the correct supposedly. and of course, we will oppose the rules together with those states. they also adhere to the primacy of the right to the sovereign right of peoples to determine their future in the future multipolar world, of course, uh, any state model will have the right to life if this state model is supported by the sovereign choice of society. here 's how they do some kind of universalist.

uh, universalist rules that are arbitrarily interpreted fairly, drunk a sheriff in washington who also swings his baton right to left, so he doesn't know who's right? whoever is guilty, considering only himself, means the chosen messiah. here's how, uh, quoted by you anyway. well, that won't happen. this is the path to a belarusian, a sovereign path, so president lukashenka has been leading us for this since the fourth year. in fact, they are constantly trying to destroy it. see it doesn't work. this means that even a small country, if it has a sovereign will, has the right to exist, that is only that revolution has the right to life. who can protect herself thank you thank you for being part of our program today. all thanks to our viewers for being and thinking with us for today everything.

in the hands of the book throated side by side, choking with a skin word. for all the manifestations of a person, the most wonderful and worthy of respect is creatively, this book in books lives on the thoughts of the past , memorandums in different people.

appreciate passing for our dry belarus 20 shatyrs