abrams and the americans are again such germany is even more involved depending on the united states. if the military-political, which, in principle, is by and large outrageous. er, as to what they are transmitting and will they be trained by the ukrainian military? well, first of all, uh, that means, uh, that means, a significant part of uh, uh, uh, military personnel, especially those who work with complex equipment in the armed forces of ukraine, are already foreigners. here they will send their foreign specialists there, who will formally be dismissed from the ranks the armed forces, uh, the state, there are enough qualified military personnel who have already been on the territory of western states over the past months. they train them there, by the way, english is necessarily included in the training programs in order to facilitate combat. well , you know, they don't need to. there, it means to talk as beautifully as it is done, and you are enough for him to understand some commands and navigate. responsibility in order to be

able to communicate with foreign mercenaries, and, uh, let's say, performs the assigned combat mission. but in general, to be honest, i don’t understand such an increased attention to the supply of awnings, tanks by themselves will not be of decisive importance on the battlefield, of course, you need to look very carefully at the supply of multiple launch rocket systems for unmanned aerial vehicles. ukraine asks for combat aircraft. we in minsk proceed from the fact that if, uh, the special military operation of the russian federation continues to be delayed , let’s say, with numerous oddities, then the west will provide ukraine with all the requested types of weapons. so far, the behavior of the west has long been reminiscent. these are the actions of a man who makes his way into marshlands . he first probes the road with a cane, and then walks lately. walking. more and more confident. of course, we hope that the leadership has prepared

a trap for the north atlantic alliance and sooner or later they will fail, but as a colleague has already correctly said, we are considering various options, including, i would like to emphasize, the deployment of a nuclear weapons on the territory of the republic of belarus thank you. give war an unpredictable thing. yes, and i think one of the reasons for russia's failures in the initial stages of a special military operation was a kind of complacency. yes, we won, uh, syria. yes, before that, we returned the crimea to our homeland. before. generally. we were able, uh, to put georgia in its place. and we have a strong army, ukrainians, who, so to speak, but over the past eight years, having clenched their teeth, were preparing for a big war and drove out a significant part of their e male population through the donbass here you are calling a young man. yes, but he was not under fire, and there many were under fire, so there is a paradox here. way for a number of positions, but

people always fight, not iron. yes, we must understand the ukrainians were simply better than us. yes, this is the first aspect of the second aspect about, uh, the red lines. well, naturally, if you say it's a red line, and then you step back, and you do this several times, it will, of course, uh, lead to the opposite side considering, let's say so your cooperativeness as a sign of weakness, therefore, if this continues, i am absolutely convinced that it is only a matter of a month when the same f16 aircraft will be delivered. why is this war so reminiscent of the first world war, or even, more precisely, the civil war in spain, because at some point, a very serious archaism arose, and no one expected that a would be a war with such a static front. for some reason, it reminds spain of the first world war. first of all, there is a large front line, very long. secondly, e is not in russia ukraine didn't have enough personally. composition, therefore, in general, in a number

of things, we had a loose defense, and we actually had a veil, this is what led to the fact that the ukrainians were able to inflict all sensitive blows on us under the raisins, but at the same time there is one thing that you started talking about, but we got away. this is war. it is very different from all previous wars thanks to elon the masculine. uh-huh now, when the russians don't have starlink, the ukrainians do. we still use it in the battery, well, in depending on the need from six to two guns. the ukrainians actually have all single nomadic guns, because each gun has a starling, why does starling seem to many, that this is just, uh, a connection? no, this is the possibility of exchanging data, yes, that is, they see, hear and can quickly strike at us, we are less of them. we see. we hear them worse, and we have less efficiency, that is, for ukrainians thanks to starlink. eh, managed to dispel. here is this famous fog of war that clauditz spoke, and we degrees we fight in the fog. i will say more, uh, they

don’t need to use tanks in large masses elon musk, having initially created a civilian product, which the pentagon will now take into service, but was able to give to ukrainians. uh, the fact that not a single army in the world americans were going to achieve such opportunities without elon musk in 35. we are talking about how the west is arming ukraine today so we continue our conversation yuriy recalled the first world war. and you know, on the first day of the attack on the somi in 1916, the british lost 60,000 people from behind today in the 21st century. still, such losses are grandiose tragic. although, in fact, you see ukraine is hiding, and the number of personnel losses, but in your opinion, how are things today? who is fighting?

who helps ukraine to fight and how are things going with mobilization in the country ? that is, there is enough of everyone on the street of old men, teenagers, men, total mobilization is coming. this means they will call and women of all ages. what kind of starlink are we talking about? this is the first. second i would like uh my colleagues in the studio and our audience. remind them that we are in the 21st century and the rate of the russian armed forces in such wars is done primarily on non-contact warfare. that is, there are not even tanks here , and perhaps even to some extent , artillery, short-range medium -range missiles, and even more so missiles. uh, it means, e

hypersonic e engine, of course, this is the future of all russian wars today still absolutely i emphasize does not apply everything. modern means that have already been adopted by the russian army. can it be that we still do not understand this while it is still going on, as i said in the first word with you in the preface of this war. and as president putin said, we have not even started yet, therefore, to say that we are about to compare tanks with a wedge with world war i and world war ii. in today's war in ukraine, they will not go on, they must be burned for border of ukraine i think we will soon we will come when such messages go. and now, when the first echelons of leopards burn down in

western ukraine, then it may be that the ardor of western religion leaders will decrease in supplying such heavy weapons to ukraine. yes, yuri well, you are right that you should not forget about anti-tank weapons, and it seems that the army has no problems with this, especially given the complete air superiority directly on the front line. western tanks still fought with air superiority of their own air force and i would like to bring the graphics to the screen. this comparative characteristics of the t-72 and the leopard. here yuri stressed that despite certain indicators. uh, russian technology is still more durable. yes yuri is hardy maneuverable and more better armed. e such innovations the latest technology. like the t-14 armata tanks, they are just undergoing state tests. so in the

future, if they replace in this war, and she still considers it to be long, they will still show themselves on the battlefield. argue with yuri. i won't for the simple reason that he's in there situation. in ukraine knows better me, i can say one thing that there is no contradiction between the lack of personnel and the presence of starlink. yes, this is how to compare warm with soft, if we are talking about tanks, uh, the fact is that our tanks e we often see them, yes, uh, they even perform without dynamic protection, which is extremely strange for a country that has dynamic protection the soviet union invented it, so when we look at a tank. we must look. uh, not only, as it were, on his tactics specifications. and how it is used is with him. this is modern protection, he has shells, like a leopard or old ones, like ours, because the same armats are not in service, by the way, when ukrainians sneer at us that this is the second army in the world, but unfortunately

the ground forces of the russian federation are not the second in the world, when russia pursued an ambitious rearmament program. first of all, the air force was overloaded, the only fleet of the strategic deterrence force, nuclear forces, and conditionally, by the time the special operation began, a huge number of modern weapons did not have time. enroll overland the troops on which the brunt fell, therefore often. eh, as they say, the devil is in the details. yes, we do not see the whole picture. well, and it's also important to note that everyone is talking about tanks , many in ukraine rejoice at this event, but an important point, about which many forget this and the maintainability of equipment. it is unlikely that in ukraine now it will be possible to deploy in workshops with the necessary equipment and all the necessary components. and you know , well, here to transport for repairs in poland, but, frankly , troublesome costly alexander ukraine counts on a blitz, that is, striking means creating a concentration of

armored fists in the direction of the main attack in my opinion. well, let's say the most strategically significant direction is a strike in order to cut off the supply between the donbass and crimea. will we succeed? time will tell, which means, uh, russian technology in my opinion, soviet technology in the confrontation with nato technology is able to withstand and the current special military operation has shown that russia really has advantage at the same time, i do not agree with the thesis of such a total air supremacy. in my opinion, air supremacy is at least challenged the more the russian federation delays, as a colleague has already said. yes, the well-known phrase of president putin we have not started yet. so it's time to start, because at the very beginning of ukraine there was no air defense system; now ukraine did not have jet systems taken on

fire by modern ones such as khaimov. now there is ukraine was not capable of large-scale offensive operations. now capable. i'll tell you one more unpopular idea that they grab children on the street there. fathers are separated from their families. this is terrible from a human point of view, but you started the transmission with a quote from the war. this is not about, uh, spillikins, if you need to recruit a certain number of personnel to complete a military task. he needs to be picked up. in our country, too, during the years of world war ii , detachments existed outside the city ; in the actions of the parties. there, indeed, there is a total war, total mobilization of the population, any crimes are committed by the ukrainian special services. with absolute impunity

, they enter cities that were previously occupied by russian troops and, on the slightest suspicion of cooperation with the russian federation, these people disappear. you understand what we see from our side in zaporizhia in melitopol, ukrainian artillery gunners are being detained, and as a punishment you are being escorted out of the zaporozhye region. what are you doing? i'm at the very beginning of russian at the very beginning of the special operation, i’m not the only one in russia who has enough experts of a serious level who said the same thing, it is necessary to strike at the energy infrastructure, they began to strike six months later with the appointment of harsh officers for why, because in a war the situation develops in this way. that what seems now brutally excessive will seem justified after some time and the sooner russia starts to fight using all conventional types of weapons, the sooner we will end this war and run away multimillion victims. yes, and if at the moment there is some type of weapon that

is capable of breaking this dead end is strategic, because we recalled the first world war, then it was tanks. and what now if we analyze the information that is in the open space about the possibility of the russian military-industrial complex and about those types of equipment that are in service with the russian army, such weapons in russia are unconditional. there are already mentioned here. of the armata tanks, only i have a question. they are in the zone of their own. no, why? they are, at all? that's the problem? this is a very important point to be answered. well, in russia there is a sufficient number of conventional weapons of the same missiles, well, they began to carry strikes against energy infrastructure facilities. why don’t they strike at the places of unloading and unloading, uh, they don’t see western military equipment. maybe they don't see. maybe uh one more question. why in the areas where the private military company wagner operates, in principle, having the ability to quickly make certain

decisions. there are advances agree, where operates the ministry of defense. where does it mean, as people who actually serve in the combat zone told me, it means that they received information, for example, it is necessary to strike with intelligence means, it is necessary to coordinate with the headquarters, the headquarters. with someone else two days later the answer comes. let's just say there's nothing there, that's all. well, uh, yuri, i would like you, as a military expert, to analyze and give a general assessment of the military prospects that we have at the moment, and now, with the involvement of the wagner pmc, russia has had quite significant successes in recent time. and i would ask my colleagues to display the current map of the front line, let's pay attention to it. yuri please give you the floor, well the fact is that a private military company today, who are taking part in a special military operation. this is definitely a very important element. e in the actions of the russian armed forces. but this is an element of a

breakthrough defense. that is, it is not the avant-garde once again emphasizes. uh, today the ukrainian military is very cool. notice that e armed forces. e of russia on one or another sector of the front, especially fron on the sector uh carbon, uh, and. uh, in general, in the donetsk direction, they are very intensively replenished with reserves. i will say this: russia has 25 million e reserve resources, that is, 25 million reservists. i think that if they still want to create such private companies, then there will be those resources that could allow russians to do this with russian citizens, looking at map and analyzing the statements that are present in the media, they talk a lot about the upcoming large-scale offensive on

zaporozhye or kharkov, but also about the likely spring breakthrough in the branch of the sea of ​​\u200b\u200bazov in order to block the land corridors of crimea, which alexander ruslan recalled, in your opinion, that today looks more realistic, i can say one thing, if i were laid, and if i had influence. on zelensky because it is quite obvious that in addition to the military, there are also political considerations. there are sponsors. by the way, i don’t think that the americans are so directly as vehement as the europeans, but are determined to drag out the war, but that was not your question. i would hit the crimea the fact that the crimea is a very vulnerable thing, and throughout the entire military history, crimea managed to be kept from strike c by a land strike. only once in the nineteenth year from loshchev, i was able to keep him from the reds, and already in the twentieth year he could not, therefore, in order to

break the company. i would direct all my possibilities there, and as i understand it, this is the strengthening of the tactical retreat that surovikin made, and it shows that the russian leadership, the military leadership, relatively personally understand this colossal risk, however, once again. this is pure water. intellectual provocation. i don’t have any mora the right to say that it will be exactly like this, yes alexander, please, let’s say that your opinion is in solidarity with ruslan. e, the head of the main intelligence directorate of the ministry of defense of ukraine budanov, it must be said that the handwriting of the ukrainian special services, the characteristic handwriting of the ukrainian special services during the current conflict, was the announcement of their actions in advance. here budanov recently in an interview with the western press started that it all started in the crimea in 2014, everything is there and will end ukraine does not hide its aggressive aspirations of the direction of the crimea i do not presume to say that the ukrainian

offensive will necessarily be successful ; moreover, there may be counter-offensive actions of the russian federation e. now yes or there soon that will change. uh, the idea of ​​the ukrainian side, again, the same budanov stated that after the russian troops left kherson, they would already be in the crimea in december, and he was echoed by various uh, western military commanders hodges. and so on they did this kind of provocative stuffing, we'll see, but i can say one thing, of course, the russian federation needs to be radically rebuilt in my opinion. i will not go into military matters here. still not a military specialization. it seems to me that it is necessary to rebuild the command and control system, but this is more visible to the general staff command. but what's going on behind the lines means, hmm, how a special military operation is perceived in different regions. here, uh, what is the approach of big business? yes, when far away

all of the 83 russian billionaires. it is in fact the owners of the economy who have taken a clear public political position, and many take not just a two-handed treacherous position in relation to the russian federation and at the same time continue to manage their assets, this is hardly in any way compatible with the goals of victory in the war, when not only ukrainian resources are the resources of the collective west, and resource analysis is not in our favor, therefore, it is urgent to take certain measures to deliver lightning strikes to be in this regard, more effective than the enemy. well, and military production, of course, and who more than many current former western politicians sounds that the red lines have evaporated ; completely forgotten. everyone echoes that the result of this battle of this clash with the west and the east, if possible, and so to speak

, will be on the battlefield. blitz question. do you agree with this alexander briefly? why are the ukrainians quiet now, because lukashenka, in his time said that we would deploy polonaise complexes and strike at your capital, and they are well aware both in kiev and back that if lukashenka said, this will be done. now, if russia moves to the same decisions. so, of course, only on the battlefield. i am sure that today here are the diplomatic options to resolve this conflict. no, there must be some kind of military turning point. and then the parties, of course, will start talking about negotiating your opinion. apparently, the spring will be hot. yes , i absolutely agree with mr. shpakovsky, that only some at least tangible victory at the front. yes, uh, tangible exactly uh, it will be able, so to speak, to think with the west with whom to sit at the negotiating table, but not with kiev, they emphasize that the

west, represented by the united states and moscow, should sit at the negotiating table, since , uh, a special military operation. the russian federation then unconditionally began to put forward conditions for such negotiations. nobody is eligible today. the russian federation dictate the terms of the peace negotiations, and so on and so forth, let me remind you. what else if god forbid as we already here it was mentioned between russia and ukraine that something khasavyurt will be signed, then you can imagine what will happen inside the social e, that means the establishment, e in the russian federation it will be a social explosion, that is, the society will not understand the leadership of the state, which will take such measures ruslan final the word of today 's war program is often very long time-consuming. and as we remember, the korean war lasted 3 years and early the

iraqi war found seven years. yes, that's why we are somehow used to the fact that wars are fleeting. here we see that a special military operation has been going on for 11.5 months, so uh, unfortunately, we do not know what the future is preparing for us, so it is very important, uh, that society has what is called in english a beautiful word, brazil with and. in russian. it cannot be translated. this is an opportunity to mobilize to take a blow and strike back, because every time the society in russia could do this, russia won, and an example of this was the second world war, the great fatherland war. every time you deflated the russian army was losing, which was, in fact, with the coming of the bolsheviks to power. i think all the experts agree on this and i think no one expects that the war in ukraine will end soon. in the past 12 months, the stakes have become too high for either

side to afford to show weakness. the future world is conquered on the battlefields, and therefore will end with a quote. all the same karl von, clausovitz battle is the only effective way to wage war. its goal is the destruction of enemy forces, as a means of ending the conflict. thank you well, now sas is authorized to declare. its arms deliveries demonstrate the west's rejection of diplomacy. fashion can be a different art. fashion for ecological culture and we also do not forget about the classics. we instill a sense of beauty. and

we get aesthetic pleasure. watch every week in the fashion culture project. about people who, no matter what, go to their goals. i do a lot of consulting for clients. i have a lot of applicants. i am not a supporter of diets, because a-a in each of i find a lot of pros and a lot of cons. i teach at a culinary school-studio. ah. well , it's still probably more of an option for those who just want to learn how to cook. i hope that soon, perhaps at school, we will open how some courses are already all the same, how, according to the greater qualifications of our thieves, they do what their heart tells them to do. uh, the main function of the chef is to

come up with dishes, train the staff and watch, uh, so that the technology is not violated and the return of the dish is the way you came up with, and i realized that i absolutely do not know. to me it seemed. it's very embarrassing. and when i started to study. here are the first steps. i realized that this is very interesting. watch in the project belarusians on our tv channel

good evening on the air panorama in the studio of ekaterina tikhomirova and the main events of this wednesday the death toll after the earthquake in turkey and syria continues to grow the loss of salvation and the miracle

of life among the big, hot stability of the state and a fair solution to the most important issues in people's lives .