with in-depth study of english on foreign trips, too, when we go somewhere, very often i act as an interpreter for our team, if there is no one around, the children who are the same paralympians train with us, there are 7-8 years old. i always bring them, for example, here is our national team of yegor, they look at them and want to somehow achieve the same results as they do and it is they who are moved by those qualities of the sleeve you experience, as if you want to swim in your hands. well , in general, i want to be the best, but it's hard. and

this is to prove that you are the best. but i would like everyone to understand who is better, probably a certain distance. it's you, well i hope i will i dream of winning gold. she is much more than enough. yes, not sports, i would like, in principle, to be realized in life somehow, so that i have my favorite business and build a good family, so that my children do not need anything. what messages from the past are found today in belarusian shrines? there is the rest of the name,

several letters and scythes, dashes next to it, as if someone was counting something. period of time, most likely, someone so filed a magpie about himself. where does spiritual education begin? we tell the kids. about god, i spend quite a lot of time so that children learn exactly what divine love is, how to communicate with each other to children. what is prosphora and how is it prepared in monasteries? i knead the dough early in the morning, then we put it up and during the day its sticky crossworks. you yourself from this test will turn out somewhere in the five liturgy of large expanses of special liturgical and somewhere around 120 small open spaces, which distinguishes and unites the main religions of the world. of course, it is very important for us that we

offer a spiritual foundation, each religion does this, uh, taking into account its traditions and rules. but in many ways we have a common approach, a look at the family, the answers to these and other questions in the spiritual educational projects on belarus 24 tv channel. memory for the milk yield, yama eats up ahshim. sculptural techniques, we seem to score so

announced that and the story and the energy of the place where they came about the memorial complexes of belarus and look at the documentary cycle the memory of my land on tv channel, belarus twenty-four. in the hands of the book, the book was throated side by side in a word , the most wonderful and suitable respect for this book is the reeling of the generation of

prices, not bypassing our big-eared belarus 20 shatyrs.

what is best to test your erudition and ingenuity correctly tricky questions to start at what age he as you, it seems, could already be called a grandfather. i consider 65 if that's the wrong answer. in instagram subscribers, his army of subscribers is already almost 500 million. who invented the detective hercule pororo thanks nikita

i know so what is the word winter is cold, watch intellectually entertaining projects on our tv channel.

nil elevich hello , on the air, the sass program is authorized to declare i am the host nadezhda sas i welcome you. i will remind. this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening in the world and to understand how these processes, events, people will affect the life of everyone and the life of the country, and the main events of world politics this week. we will tell you right now the military production. in the iranian city of isfahan, they were attacked with the help of strike drones; in tehran, they are sure that israel, which is actually at war with the islamic republic, is behind the attack; they

do not officially confirm their involvement in tel aviv, but allow themselves numerous leaks in the media that detail the details of the operation the strike was probably delivered by a sabotage group that penetrated iranian territory and assembled drones on the spot, which shows new horizons the use of drones for conducting. wars and hybrid conflicts, president of the republic of belarus alexander lukashenko paid an official visit to zimbabwe following negotiations with the president of this country, emerson nangagwa, the head of state noted that within the framework of the mechanization program launched in 2020, farms. zimbabwe the belarusian side delivered almost 2,000 tractors and about 80 grain harvesters. this technique helped to ensure the country's food security, zimbabwe's investment and cooperation projects will become the basis for continuing cooperation. united states joe biden

plans to visit poland by the end of the month, where he will meet with the country's president and ukrainian leader volodymyr zelensky, it will obviously be about the supply of western weapons for the needs of the ukrainian army. poland is not only the main transport and logistics hub in these deliveries, but also more active than any another country. nato is participating in the conflict by sending weapons to ukraine and thousands of volunteers who are fighting at the front in whole units. among the names of the most eminent military theorists, one stands apart, karl von klausov, the teacher of all modern generals and military leaders, and i will begin the program with a quote from him, kind-hearted people can, of course, believe that there is some original way to disarm and defeat the enemy without spilling a lot of blood. they wars also think that this is the true achievement of art. to fight sounds

attractive, but in fact it is a deception that needs to be opened up. there is an extremely dangerous business in which the worst mistakes occur. from kindness and unfortunately, the cynical wisdom of clausowitz has proved its case many times and apparently, many are aware of this even now in moscow and kiev in western capitals, the conflict in ukraine is entering a new even more dangerous and bloody stage. which does not recognize half measures. what will be the new stage of the war and how to prepare for it opposing forces? we will discuss today's program. i am glad to welcome political scientist alexander shpakovsky ruslan nikolaevich pukhov , director of the center for analysis of strategy and technology, a member of the council on the foreign defense policy of the russian federation, and ukrainian military expert yuriy godekin joins our broadcast via skype. we start our program with a quick survey, in your opinion. nato can be considered a full-fledged participant in the

conflict in ukraine word. yes alexander well, from the point of view of direct involvement in the conflict, probably not, but in fact, of course, i supply weapons, providing various hybrid ones. uh, ways to support the armed forces of ukraine for this, of course, is a party to the conflict. yuriy is a direct participation in the hostilities on the territory of ukraine. moreover , nato military personnel have been present on the territory of ukraine for a long time until february 24, 2022 as instructors of the armed forces. ruslan, you know, there is an opinion that the increasing involvement of nato in the conflict in ukraine is not least dictated by the lack of evaporation of fear about the response of the russian federation, that is, at some

point for the western curators of the zelensky regime, russia appeared in the form of a paper tiger that intimidates, threatens, but does not take any action in order not to allow the west. here is a full fall into this game. you started with a quote from claudia claudia to be surprised, and i would like to return this quote to you, saying that humanity in war is inhumane russia tried to carry out, and the operation at the initial stage was quite humane means, and the same clauses he said that the initial disposition of the war, if it was not straightened out correctly, then it is very difficult to correct mistakes, it was here that the trap occurred, as if russia had incorrectly set the disposition and tried to behave humanely. as a result. we are where we are, so uh, the main problem. with all the direct participation of nato, it lies not in nato, but lies in our

russian e heads, yes, and if we don’t rebuild this head, then a special military operation may perhaps drag out the methods of rebuilding. perhaps there is a war. the case of the young, as choi said, the cure against wrinkles. see how dynamically the ukrainians and their western curators are acting. and we're still rocking the old fashioned way. yes on the one hand. e. we always have an excuse that the russians harness slowly and drive fast. yes , the red army was largely defeated in the forty-first year, and in the forty-second year, until the end of the forty- second year, it received a number of significant defeats, but we must remember that the soviet union was not alone in that war, the soviet union had powerful allies who supplied him with equipment, including

gasoline combat gear trucks, after all. otherwise, we rode horses. now ukraine has all these powerful allies, and yet the soviet union was a huge bottomless reservoir with the people of russia , by the way, notice one thing when nato countries support ukraine, but there are already hot heads who want to clash with russia directly . for example, the head of the defense committee of the british parliament. he stated that the uk, already involved in the conflict in ukraine, must now face russia face to face. elwood called for an increase in the uk defense budget and also to reverse the government's earlier decision to cut the british army by 10,000 men. let's listen to direct speech. we are at war in europe. we need to move to martial law. we provide weapons to ukraine we

need to meet with russia face to face. they leave all the work to ukraine. yuriy , in your opinion, how to react to the same russian federation well, such statements are forced to strike already at the alliance, or the fact is that there is rather, and the reluctance to bring to such a hot phase, and the situation the leadership of the russian federation or rather, there are no methods and levers of influence on those. nato well, the fact is that the russian federation, represented by its leadership, has long demonstrated that incredible tolerance for all provocative statements made by the west. ah, so western speakers. here, uh, we remember them all very well. e, i won’t repeat it now, but i’ll say that the main thing

is that the time will come, and it’s probably already it has come that we are indeed the russian federation since. uh, the third world war, as i believe, it is already in its prologue, that is, the main part. the truth has not yet come , so in this prologue, the russian federation has the right to inflict. uh, preemptive strikes with a compensatory weapon. moreover, in places of accumulation of the weapons that are supplied to ukraine, i mean, first of all, such states as poland, romania well, including great britain, which has already exploded to such an extent that it allows itself too a lot in their statements. and even more so in their actions. i think that the hour is not far off when the west will shudder from the fact that the russian federation, what it can and what it can’t, it can do a lot. well, president

of the republic of belarus alexander lukashenko noted that the west has not abandoned its plans regarding belarus ukraine continues to arm forcing a tough response, belarus is already there in the west, they will lose their hands in ukraine, they don’t know these cooks. why are the ukrainians, on the one hand , asking us not to fight with ukraine, so that the troops do not move further there , somehow they do not propose to conclude an attack, but on the other hand, they are preparing this explosive. blend and arm them. more lithuania in general about making noise. why do they need it? why is it not clear, therefore, we are forced to react harshly. why , alexander, how to evaluate, in your opinion, the allied grouping of troops that is currently holding back for nato, uh, deployed in recent months on the territory of the republic of belarus and conducting active exercises, after all

, has its own effect. well, of course, the effect. eat the effect lies primarily in the fact that the republic of belarus, the military-political leadership of our country, understanding the nature of the emerging international situation, notes a trend towards escalation of the international situation, which found additional confirmation in the decisions made on the supply of weapons to ukraine, we developed a set of measures in advance aimed at ensuring the security of belarus it is quite obvious that alone and on our own we cannot at the present stage, guarantee the security of our states. the defense budget of the same poland for the next year is 20 billion dollars. this is about 20 times more than the defense budget of the republic of belarus. and they want to increase it here, you can only respond with asymmetric decisions. well, first of all, uh, our russian allies have provided our country with additional weapons. these are the s-400 complexes and the iskander missile systems for independent operation, which

the belarusian army passed, but secondly, uh, it means on the territory of belarus according to allied military doctrine. we have the military doctrine of the union state with russia, a regional group of troops of the union state has been deployed, that is, the russian military contingent has arrived, which is conducting combat coordination activities together with the army of the republic of belarus, which must be understood here in this situation, of course, uh, these troops insufficient for some offensive operations in the belarusian army, plus the russian military contingent. well, let's just say they are capable of fulfilling the task of protecting our republic, but not offensive actions. secondly, uh, the initiative introduction of war is prohibited by the constitution of the republic of belarus , article 18. this means that this is the edition of the constitution that was adopted last year at a referendum, but uh, firstly, we always reserve the right according to our military doctrine to apply a preventive strike if belarus becomes aware of

specific aggressive plans against our republic. we have the right to deliver a preemptive strike, and as far as i know, that means to all our neighbors. i mean, those who profess an unfriendly policy towards belarus through other diplomatic channels have received this information . here we have iskanders, we have polonaises. there are several hundreds of these complexes. and in principle, the ability to inflict fire damage on e capitals, e neighboring nato states and ukraine kiev - this takes into account the change in rhetoric from here, because if over the past year we have regularly heard from danilov, it means other speakers of the ukrainian regime, a threatening statement that that they will strike at territory of belarus in recent times. so, they have moved to all sorts of peaceful initiative. says it's very important here. while we may not need to conclude any

facts, you are not going to any. now just one moment must be taken into account, the current situation. ukraine is being pushed by its western development partners, let's say, to counter-offensive actions in this regard. them of course. i would like to enlist, some guarantees. the countries of belarus to disorganize the belarusian russian military-political alliance in order to in order to calmly move here, uh, according to the voiced plan, that is, cut cut this land corridor from the donbass to the crimea. there they will advance, and here in any case, even realizing that we will not attack, but they must from the point of view. here is the art of war to keep a grouping of 20,000 people. they keep here, you know? and, of course, no facts. we will conclude nothing with them and will not do anything with this regime. you see, there is no peace in any country, e ministry of war. everyone has only ministry of defense, however, wars happen, so no scenario can be ruled out.

uh, i’ll say no more even excluding scenarios that russia will conclude some kind of conditionally call obscene peace, a la savyurt or a la, even the treaty of brest-litovsk with the west, if ukrainian pressure is strong and quite, perhaps, e this will put belarus even more difficult position. yes, therefore, you must understand that, of course, the belarusian people with their tragic history must have a scenario, including keeping the defense one including and without russia, therefore, of course, the local establishment should think about it. what are the possibilities of building up e personnel of armaments e you e, can you talk about, and especially based on your own vk 20. 20 was marked by an active phase of arming ukraine in the west well, there are different thoughts in the

same european union of the chairmen of the european people's party, the leading factions, the european parliament, weber said that the european union , against the backdrop of the situation around ukraine, needs a kind of military economy. according to weber, ess is now unable to quickly to provide the necessary weapons not for their own defense not for ukraine well, the day before, the united states of america and germany, which for a long time refrained from supplying tanks to kiev, agreed to send combat vehicles, leopards and abrams, and the last decision of the western countries is strange to wear heavy weapons stands to ukraine in detail and in our story. the supply of weapons to the kiev regime is causing more and more disputes within nato, it becomes difficult for an ally to agree, so the meeting of the contact group on ukraine at the rammstein airbase in germany did not give much results. even with all the loud us promises we will support ukraine for as long as it takes, now we are at a

turning point in the russian-ukrainian conflict, this is not the time to slow down, this is the time to dig deeper. we will not surrender the main topic of the meeting was the discussion of kiev's deliveries of heavy tanks. first of all, it was about leopard 2, poland, denmark and finland immediately gave their consent. however, not a single country of the alliance has the right to transfer the leopard. without the permission of the manufacturer of these tanks in germany, berlin was split here the allies refused, poland did not expect this and even announced the creation of a coalition of countries to transfer tanks to kiev without the frg position. unacceptable, what else does berlin need to open its eyes and start acting in accordance with the potential of the german state of berlin should not weaken or sabotage the actions of other countries later, the frg agreed to supply a leopard to kiev, but only if the united states sends all its abrams tanks in the pentagon to such the ultimatum was not agreed, explaining this by high

material and technical costs. we have to weigh all the pros and cons before making such decisions just like that and i'm sure that in the near future a decision will be made, but i don't know how this decision will look like, according to experts, indecisive scholz. trying to hide behind the backs of the americans. because the distribution of too many weapons and ammunition. can seriously affect a nation's defense capability given that tanks and ground forces are typically the primary combat power in warfare and last but not least german dissatisfaction. anti-war rallies are constantly held in the country calling for a halt in the supply of weapons to kiev, in the end , the scholsa was persuaded. he could no longer ignore, neither washington nor other allies in the berlin bloc promised to supply kiev with 14 leopard 2 tanks and allow their

export from other countries. well, by the way, according to recent sociology, 41% of germans believe that the government should not expand arms supplies to ukraine 25% consider it a necessity 26 think that now there are too many supplies. well, of course, their no one hears the voice and it is important to note that if the scholz eventually blew away, or surrendered. there is a state such as, for example, hungary, which refuse to supply weapons to ukraine, and right now an expert on security policy, military historians from hungary , valens, kut himself, is joining our airwaves. i myself am a boiler of dry programs, i am also very glad to be here. thank you remains the only state for the european union that does not have a technician first. perhaps

it could be to expose yourself to some kind of pressure from other western states are exposed to freedom on foot, which motivates the body to follow a serious understanding on the part of the state and the population that this is not our war. we do not provide war equipment because we do not want to participate in it. this is the official position and mass conviction of the population. to what extent is nato per se prepared for the high- intensity, long-term conflict that we have seen in ukraine for decades, many european armies lacked training funding even for short-term operations such as in iraq dagestan now. to fight if necessary

, there is clearly a lot of pressure on the european military in terms of providing military assistance and the fact that the lack of resources and reserves is clearly making itself felt and the message from various countries that they have reached the point where they can no longer be supported these coasters. unfortunately, in the last 30 years europe has invested too little in the military-industrial complex. thanks a lot. thank you for your time and for your participation in our program. thank you let's talk. actually about the supply of western weapons. ruslan here, in your opinion for a start. let's discuss that over the past 12 months, quite a

lot of equipment has been provided in the opinion of, uh, some experts , the most important were the heim missile systems for other artillery . sight. why did tanks suddenly appear now, if we are talking about tanks, so we are no longer envisaging a defensive position, it is an introductory position, you know tanks, uh, with all their vulnerabilities. and we see how many of them were stuffed. and even during this military operation and others, the only possibilities still remain. maneuver and breakthrough of static defense, therefore, so to speak, without tanks, nowhere later. we must not forget that over the past 11 months, ukrainians, who did not have very many tanks, mainly used tanks as a kind of long-range sniper rifle, unfortunately, only one crew of ten

states to lead for horizontal shooting from a tank, but if he can do it serious serious weapon, but i will say more. with all due respect to our tank builders, our tank is very good, let's say the profile is not very small. yes, it is quite tenacious, but the same leopard has an engine one and a half times more powerful and the gun shoots further, so these tanks will inflict serious damage, if possible with your permission , by crashing the schedule. a compare here, first , let's pay attention to e, the countries that a have already agreed to provide ukraine with heavy military equipment. well, it's not that wide. yes, that's how it would be like a list states, some of them are still trying to resist. well, you see, the germans are well aware that the ukrainians with their worship of culture. uh, world war ii and banderit in a quick way. he draws some ss e, symbols, and even no one will be able to control it. it will be recorded.

uh, and posted on social networks and for russians, so to speak, yes, and for belarusians. yes, and german dances with soviet symbols that crush our earth . this is something more than just that, therefore the germans. i understand perfectly why they do not want. but the fact that it will radicalize the russian population. i regularly see cars with ukrainian license plates in moscow with a high degree of probability. it is unlikely that the ukrainians arrived, so someone uses it, but i have never seen this car come up to pierce its wheels there or, i don’t know, beat it. you can imagine that in ukraine, uh, a russian car with russian numbers, that is, the russians did not radicalize, but this supply of us with unconditional divisions, yuri, is a question for you in your opinion. why exactly tanks, as it is widely discussed that ukraine is experiencing a shortage of shells, and the same artillery guns, huge problems with air defense

are even more with aviation, but all western leaders unanimously say tanks. here is our answer. well , this is a kind of weapon in the ideological war. i want to remind you that the story is with holy javelins. we remember what a huge propaganda hype was unleashed about these anti-tank missile systems. and what came out of it this is the first. second, i would not like to delve into performance characteristics or other machines, but i will say one russian military equipment is an order of magnitude higher in all. characteristics for all emphasize, what is western technology? he drew attention to the characteristics of the tanks, which were provided by western curators to ukraine abrams challenger - two leopards and leclercs from the uk. well

, what is surprising is that it seems that western leaders have neglected the main rule for supplying the army, which is to achieve maximum unification of the types and models of weapons that they provide. how yes ukrainian soldiers. maybe in a short time to learn how to manage such complex foreign equipment, that is, alexander turned out to be such a motley delivery that it was calculated to agree. the logic is the logic lies in the fact that they give those volumes that they are able to provide, it is perfectly necessary to understand that tank building is a complex industry, including for the nato state. why are the germans resisting? i will argue with ruslan here, probably, this is not connected with ideological reasons, or these ideological reasons are secondary, in fact, simply the leadership, the bundeswehr,

the leadership of germany, who still have some rudiments of self-subjectivity there , understand that by transferring the tanks to the armament of ukraine, they themselves remain generally vulnerable from the point of view security and to an even greater extent will buy abram america even more the degree of germany is even more involved, depending on the united states, a happy military-political, which, in principle, is by and large transcendent here, as for what they transmit and train or ukrainian military personnel. well, first of all, uh, so, uh, uh, military personnel, especially those who work with sophisticated equipment in the armed forces of ukraine so, they are foreigners. so they will send their foreign specialists there, who formally will have enough qualified military personnel from the ranks of the armed forces and nato states, who have already been on the territory of western states over the past months. they teach them there, by the way, in the program

english is necessarily included in the course in order to facilitate. well, you know, they don't need to. there, it means to talk as beautifully as it is done. it is enough for them to understand some commands and navigate the terrain in order to be able to communicate with foreign mercenaries. and uh, oriens, let's say, fulfills the assigned combat mission. but in general, to be honest, i don’t understand such an increased attention to the supply of a tank, tanks by themselves will not be of decisive importance on the field combat, of course, you need to look very carefully at the supply of multiple rocket launchers of unmanned aerial vehicles, ukraine asks for combat aviation. we in minsk proceed from the fact that if this is a specially military operation. to the federation will continue to be delayed, let's say with numerous oddities, then the west will provide ukraine with all the requested types of weapons. so far, the behavior of the west has long

been reminiscent. this is the action of a man who makes his way into marshlands . he first probes the road cane, and then goes lately. walking. more and more confidently. of course, we hope that the russian leadership has prepared a trap for the north atlantic alliance, and sooner or later they will fail, but as a colleague has already correctly said and we are reading various options, including the deployment of nuclear weapons on the territory thank you republic of belarus. you know war, eternal predictable. yes, and i think one of the reasons for russia's failures in the initial stages of the special military operations. it was a kind of complacency. yes, we won, uh, syria. yes, before that, we returned it. before that, in general, we were able to put georgia in its place at home. and we have a strong army, ukrainians, who, so to speak, have clenched their teeth over the past 8 years, but have been preparing for a big war and driven

a significant part of their male population through the donbass here you are calling a young man. yes, but he was not under fire, and there many were under fire, so here, paradoxically, in a number of positions, but people always fight, they are iron. yes we have to understand the ukrainians were just to improve us. yes, this is the first aspect of the second aspect about the red lines. well , naturally, if you say it's a red line and then you step back and you do this a few times, it will, of course, uh, result in the opposite side being viewed, let's say your promptness, as a sign of weakness, so if this will continue, i am absolutely convinced that it is only a matter of a month when there will be a fast. for planes, the same f-16s. why is this war so reminiscent of world war i or even, to be more precise, the civil war in spain, because at some point a very serious archaism arose, and no one expected

that it would be a war with such a static front. why does this remind spain of world war i? well, first of all, a big front line, very long. secondly, neither russia nor ukraine had a sufficient number of personnel. therefore, in general, in a number of things, we had a loose defense. and we actually had a veil, this is what led to the fact that the ukrainians were able to raisins deal us all sensitive blows, but in doing so there is one thing that you started to say. we went to the side. this is war. it is very different from all previous wars thanks to elon the tarlinka mask. uh-huh now, when the russians don't have starlink, the ukrainians have we still use it in the battery, well , depending on the need, from six to two guns, the ukrainians have almost all the guns. night wanderer because each gun has a starling. in what way does starling seem to many to be just a connection? no it is the possibility of exchanging data, yes, that is, they see, hear and can quickly strike at

us, we are less of them. we see. we hear worse and we have less efficiency, that is, for ukrainians thanks to starlink. eh, managed to dispel. that famous fog of war that klaus was talking about. and we pretty much fight in the fog, i'll tell you. they no longer need to use tanks in large masses elon musk, having initially created a civilian product, which the pentagon will now take into service, but was able to give to ukrainians. what's this not a single army in the world, the americans were going to achieve such opportunities without elon musk by the thirty-fifth year. we are talking about how the west is arming ukraine today so we continue our conversation yuriy recalled the first world war. and uh, you know, on the first day of the somi attack in 1916, the british lost 60,000 men from behind

today in the 21st century. still, such losses are grandiose tragic. although in fact, you see, ukraine is hiding, and the number of personnel losses, but in your opinion, how are things today? who is fighting? who helps ukraine to fight and how are things going with mobilization in the country ? that is, there is enough of everyone on the street of old men, teenagers, men, total mobilization is coming. this means that women of all ages will also be called. what kind of starlink are we talking about? this is the first. second i would like uh my colleagues in the studio and our audience. remind them that we are in the 21st century and the headquarters of the russian armed forces

wars are made primarily on non-contact warfare. that is, there are not even tanks here , and perhaps even to some extent , artillery, short-range medium -range missiles, and even more so missiles. e, it means, e hypersonic e engine, of course, this is the future of all wars in russia today, i absolutely emphasize that it does not use everything. modern means that have already been adopted by the russian army. do we really not yet understand this, while it is still going on, as i said in the first word with you, the preface of this war. and as president putin said, we have not even started yet, therefore, to say that we are about to compare tanks with

a wedge with world war i and world war ii. in today's war in ukraine, they will not go on, they must be burned for border of ukraine, and i think we will soon come to this when such messages go. and now, when the first echelons of leopards burn down in western ukraine, then it may be that the ardor of western religion leaders will decrease in supplying such heavy weapons to ukraine. yes yuri well, you are right in that that one should not forget about anti-tank weapons, and it seems that the army has no problems with this, especially given the complete air superiority directly on the front line. western tanks still fought with air superiority of their own air force and i would like to bring the graphics to the screen. this is a comparative characteristic of the t-72 and the leopard. here yuri stressed that despite certain indicators. uh, russian

technology is still more durable. yes yuri hardy maneuverable and more better armed. e such innovations the latest technology. like the t-14 armata tanks, they are just undergoing state tests. so in the future, if they replace in this war, and she still considers it to be long, they will still show themselves on the battlefield. argue with yuri. i won't for the simple reason that he's in there situation. in ukraine, he knows better than me. i can say one thing, that the contradictions between the lack of personnel and the presence of staling. no, yes, it's like comparing warm to soft, if we're talking about tanks, uh, the fact is that our tanks e we often see them, yes, uh, they even perform without dynamic protection, which is extremely strange for a country that the soviet union invented dynamic protection, therefore, when we look at a tank. we must look. uh, not only, as it were, on his tactics

specifications. and how it is used is with him. this is modern protection, he has shells, like a leopard or old ones, like ours, because the same armats are not in service. by the way, when ukrainians are ironic over us, how is it this is the second army in the world, and unfortunately the ground forces of the russian federation are not the second in the world, when russia pursued an ambitious rearmament program. first of all, the air force paratroopers, the fleet, the strategic deterrence forces, nuclear forces, were overloaded, and conditionally, by the time the special operation began, a huge amount of modern weapons did not have time. to enter the ground forces, on which the brunt fell, therefore often. eh, as they say, the devil is in the details. yes, we do not see the whole picture. well, and more it is important to note that everyone is talking about tanks, many in ukraine rejoice at this event, but an important point about which many people forget is the maintainability of equipment. it is unlikely that in ukraine now it will be possible to deploy in workshops with the

necessary equipment and all the necessary components. and you know, well, to transport for repairs in poland, well, to be honest, troublesome costly alexander ukraine is counting on a blitz, that is, striking means creating a concentration of armored fists in the direction of the main strike and in my opinion. well most let's just say that a strategically significant direction is a blow in order to cut off the supply between the donbass and crimea. will it succeed? yes , time will tell, so, uh, russian technology. soviet technology, in confrontation with nato technology, is, in my opinion, capable of withstanding, and the current special military operation has shown that russia really has an advantage in a number of types of weapons; however, i do not agree with the thesis about such total air supremacy. in my opinion, air supremacy is at least more contested than

more the russian federation is slowing down, as a colleague has already said. yes, the well-known phrase of president putin we have not started yet. so it's time to begin, because at the very beginning of ukraine there was no air defense system; now ukraine did not have jet systems that modern ones such as khaimov took on fire. now there is ukraine was not capable of large-scale offensive operations. now capable. i'll tell you one more unpopular idea that they grab children on the street there. fathers are separated from their families. it's terribly human points of view. but you started the broadcast with a quote to war. it's not about here. uh, spillikins, if you need to recruit a certain number of personnel to complete a military task. he needs to be picked up. in our country, too, during the years of the great patriotic war, there were detachments on fire, there was stalin’s order, they shot cowards, deserters, ponikers, and, according to the laws

of wartime, very quickly, which we see in the actions of the parties. there, indeed, total war, total mobilization of the population, any crimes are committed ukrainian special services. absolutely with impunity they enter cities that were previously occupied by russian troops and, on the slightest suspicion, cooperation with the russian federation. these people disappear, you understand what we see from our side. in zaporozhye, in melitopol, the gunners of the ukrainian artillery are detained; as a punishment, they are escorted out of the zaporozhye region. well, what are you doing? i am at the very beginning of the russian colleagues. at the very beginning of the special operation. i am not the only one in russia who has enough experts of a serious level who spoke the same thing needs to be struck at the energy infrastructure began to be struck six months later with the appointment of the suroviki. on why, because in the war the situation develops in this way. that what seems now cruel excessive after some time

will seem justified and the sooner russia starts to fight with the use of all conventional weapons, the sooner we will end this war, we will escape the many millions of victims. yes, and if at the moment there is some type of weapon that is able to break this impasse strategic, because we recalled the first world war, then it was tanks. and what now if we analyze the information? which is in the open space about the capabilities of the russian military-industrial complex and about those types of equipment that are in service with the russian army, such weapons in russia are unconditional. there are already mentioned flavor tanks here. so i have a question they have in the zone its not. no, why? do they exist at all? that's the problem? this is a very important point to be answered, but in russia has a sufficient number of conventional weapons of the same missiles. well, it’s good that they began to strike at energy infrastructure facilities. why are they not hitting the places of unloading unloading. uh,

they don't see western military equipment. maybe they don't see. maybe uh, one more question. why in the direction where the private military company wagner operates, in principle, having the ability to quickly make certain decisions. there are advances agree, where does the ministry of defense work, where does it mean, as i was told by people who actually speaking in the combat zone, they serve, which means they received information, for example, by means of intelligence. apparently, it is necessary to coordinate the strike with the headquarters of the headquarters with someone else in two days the answer comes. let's just say there's nothing there. that's it, well, yuri, i would like you, as a military expert, to analyze and give a general assessment of the military prospects that we have at the moment, and with the involvement of wagner pmcs, russia has made quite significant progress lately. and i would ask my colleagues to display the current map of the front line, let's pay attention to it. yuri

please give you the floor, well the point is that private military companies are today that are taking part in a special military operation. this is definitely a very important element. e in the actions of the russian armed forces. but this is an element of a breakthrough defense. that is, it is not the avant-garde once again emphasizes. uh, today the ukrainian military is very cool. noticing that the armed forces of russia are in one or another sector of the front, especially in the sector of coal, uh, and. uh, in general, in the donetsk direction, they are replenished with reserves very intensively. i will say so russia has 25 million reserve resources, that is, 25 million reservists. i think that, if they still want to create such private companies, then, uh, there will be those resources that

could allow russians to do this with russian citizens, looking at the map and analyzing those hmm statements that are present in the media say a lot about the impending large-scale offensive against zaporozhye or kharkov, but also about the likely spring breakthrough in the branch of the sea of ​​\u200b\u200bazov in order to block the land corridors of crimea, which alexander ruslan also commemorated on your look that today looks more realistic i can say one thing, if i was mortgaged, and if i had influence. on zelensky because it is quite obvious that in addition to the military, there are also political considerations. there are sponsors. by the way, i don't think that the americans are so straight forward, just like the europeans, uh, they are determined to drag out the war, but that was not your question. i would strike at the crimea. the point is that the crimea is a very vulnerable thing, and

throughout the entire military history, they managed to keep the crimea, and there from a land strike. only once in the nineteenth year from loshchev, i was able to keep him from the reds, and already in the twentieth year he could not, therefore, in order to break the company. i would send all my possibilities there, and as i understand it, this is the strengthening of the tactical retreat that surovikin made, and it shows that the russian e, the military leadership relatively personally understand this colossal risk, however, once again. this is pure water. intellectual provocation. i don't have any mora the right to say that it will be exactly like this, yes alexander please your opinion about let's say so with ruslan is in solidarity. e, the head of the main intelligence directorate of the ministry of defense of ukraine budanov, it must be said that the handwriting of the ukrainian special services, the characteristic handwriting of the ukrainian special services during the current

conflict, was the announcement of their actions in advance. budanov recently stated in an interview with the western press that it all started in crimea in 2014. it will all end there. ukraine does not hide its aggressive aspirations towards crimea. the offensive will certainly be successful ; moreover, there may be counter-offensive actions of the russian federation now, or there in the near future, which will change. eh, the intention of the ukrainian side, again, the same budanov stated that after the russian troops left kherson, they would already be in the crimea in december and he would be in torah or various western military commanders hodges. and others did this kind of provocative stuffing, we'll see, but i can say one thing, of course, the russian federation needs e fundamentally rearrange in my opinion. i will not go into military matters here. still, i am not a military specialist, but it seems to me that it is necessary to rebuild the command and control system . but this is more visible to them than the general staff command. but what's going on behind the lines

means, hmm, how a special military operation is perceived in different regions. here. uh, what's the approach of big business? yes, when far from all of the eighty-three russian billionaires, and these are in fact the owners of the economy, have taken a clear public political position, and many take not just a two-handed treacherous position in relation to the russian federation and at the same time continue to manage their assets, is unlikely . this is somehow combined with the goals of victory in the war, when mobiles are against russia. won and not only ukrainian resources, but the resources of the collective west and resource analysis is not in our favor, therefore, it is urgent to take certain measures to inflict lightning strikes to be more effective than the enemy in this regard. well, military production, of course, and who is more positioned by many western politicians and current exes sounds like the red

lines have evaporated they just don't everyone is fighting the way he wants the way he can, but apart from that the negotiations completely forgot everyone echoes that the result of this battle is this clash from the west and the east, if possible, and so to speak, it will be on the battlefield in the face of the question. do you agree with this alexander briefly? why are ukrainians under the cycle now? because lukashenka once said that we would deploy palanes complexes and strike in your capital, and they know very well both in kiev and back that if lukashenka said, it will be done. now, if russia moves to the same decisions, then, of course. only on the battlefield. i am sure that today here are the diplomatic options to resolve this conflict. no, there must be some kind of military turning point, and then the parties, of course, will start talking about negotiations in your opinion. apparently, the spring will be hot. yes, i absolutely agree with mr. shpakovsky that only some

at least a tangible victory at the front. yes, uh, tangible exactly uh, it will be able, so to speak, to think with the west with whom to sit down at the negotiating table, but it’s not emphasized that the west, represented by the united states and moscow, should sit at the negotiating table, since, uh, a special military operation. the russian federation then unconditionally began to put forward conditions for such negotiations. nobody is eligible today. the russian federation dictate the terms of the peace negotiations, and so on and so forth, let me remind you. what else if not god forbid, as we have already mentioned here between russia and ukraine, something khasavyurt will be signed, then you can imagine what will happen inside the social e-e, then the establishment e-e in the russian federation will be a social explosion, that is, the

society will not understand the leadership of the state, which ruslan will take such measures, the final words of today's war program are often very long and take time. uh, as we remember, the korean war was 3 years old and the iraqi war was early years. yes, that's why we somehow got used to the fact that wars transient. here we see that a special military operation has been going on for 11.5 months, so uh, unfortunately, we do not know what the future is preparing for us, so it is very important uh that society has what is called in english a beautiful word, brazil with and. in russian. it cannot be translated. this is an opportunity to mobilize to take a blow and strike back, because every time the society in russia could do this, russia won, and an example of this was the second world war, the great fatherland war. every time you deflated, handed over your army to russia. lost, which was, in fact, with the

coming of the bolsheviks to power. i think all the experts agree on this and i think no one expects that the war in ukraine will end soon. in the past 12 months , the stakes have become too high for either side to afford to show weakness. the future world is conquered on the battlefields, and therefore the quotes will end. all the same karl von, clausovitz battle is the only effective way to wage war. its goal is the destruction of enemy forces, as a means of ending the conflict. thank you well, now i am authorized to declare. its arms deliveries demonstrate the west's rejection of diplomacy