when everyone can participate correctly, you said, uh, you don't have to be a member of the peace foundation and uh, apply to join. although today there are more and more such people. uh, people are starting to want to vote for peace. uh, making a small contribution of some kind. uh, who does it? of course, we are very grateful to such people. today we correctly noticed more than 150,000 already , uh, the numbers are approaching 200 thousand, but the volunteers are those who, uh, monthly contribute annually, and to the cause of peace in those of our projects that we are implementing are really more than a million, and moreover, these are people. uh, which refers to completely different professions for different ages. on the board of the funder. today, e includes all the heads of the main religious denominations

of the republic of belarus, all the leaders of the national diasporas living in belarus , that is, on a national religious basis. we do not share within our organization, but show that this is a very important component of the world we are talking about, that the type of pandemic was actively helped medical institutions, how was it? seems about it. yes, you know that at this moment, uh, this is quite difficult, not only for our country, difficult for, uh, the whole world. we really, uh, all were able to see with you who was on the front line of the struggle, who was in that difficult situation when he saved people at the risk of his life, and, of course, we could not but respond and provide our help. and this is not only hmm help was provided by the health institution in the purchase of protective equipment disinfectants, but we really

peace fund activists, all over the country personally visited, uh, all the departments where patients were treated with a view and we supported the doctors supported and morally and a little lost such participation we took at this moment, but we continue today also to support medical e. uh, the establishment of a health care facility is so. uh, all over the country. today we are helping to equip wards for labor war veterans, making them comfortable for the stay of veterans, there are already more than a thousand wards throughout the country. we were able to help arrange. eh, plans. there are so many more another line of work for you. here in belarus there are about a hundred schools where projects are being implemented. and on the patriotic civic education of youth, what kind of projects are these than here? here, the miran foundation is putting a hand in a project jointly with the ministry of education of the

republic of belarus, a project to create a network of schools of peace in the republic of belarus, there are more than 127 such schools, and the figure is large, of course, but today they are willing. e more than we can that's probably to take to the network in order to e was. quality work with these schools. well, of course, the main idea is to help. uh in the upbringing of a young patriot upbringing in a man of a good heart upbringing. uh, a merciful citizen who will not be alien to the concept of and e, does charity work and provides humanitarian assistance, this year has been declared the year of peace and creation, for sure you have such increased attention. what other projects would you like to implement, what are some of the immediate plans. yes indeed. you know that such a year is familiar to us.

really. here is what is declared the year of the world and creation. i think that this is an important message for every belarusian today to think about what he personally can do to preserve peace in this regard, of course, ours. these are the ones that we traditionally continue the fondomer, but even today we are already planning new interesting projects, so we recently held negotiations with the belarusian notary chamber. hmm, our notary colleagues came up with the initiative and we are considering the issue. uh, take custody. mm. uh family homes in every part of the country and we continue to be reliable partner of the state in the international arena.

today, we are a candidate for observer status, he is in the economic and social union 12 is very important for the country, because, uh, this is an opportunity to broadcast the opinion of ordinary people at the international well , thank you, everything is being implemented maxim miskov, the donor of the board of the belarusian foundation, answered the questions of the program. yes of the world, as a result, an analysis of the main events of this week in the information and analytical program is on the website of belarus 24 point bilay and also to in social networks. i forgive mine. all the best.

today our studio is visited by oleg gaidukevich, chairman of the liberal democratic party of belarus, deputy of the chamber, representative of the national assembly of belarus, and aleksey sokol, first secretary of the central committee of the communist party of belarus, the political system of our country is changing right before our eyes, and the parliament has already approved a new law on political parties. what conceptual things are laid down there, that this is a large-scale change in the political system throughout the country. everything changes. this is a bill that worked. or we have been over it for more than one month. it was very serious. this is like a deep work with the participation of the expert community of representatives of political parties. my colleague also participated. here we both sat in the expert council that developed this law. and i really want to note that the drafters of the bill really came from the party, from the people , from the party, and not from above. that is, what the parties wanted, then, in principle, they are in this law and

laid down that changes uh, two aspects of the main i would like to point out. the first is the requirements for political parties and the ordering of the political field of the country. we have to clean up there. today we are on registration. here in the country there are 15 political parties, of which only a few others actually operate either on paper, or, even worse, are destructive political forces that oppose their own constitution against their own constitution against their own people. called for sanctions someone called for mass riots, and someone lived for decades at someone else's expense at the expense of external financing. i didn’t work anywhere, the leaders of these parties received money from there , empty work books, and, uh, they did everything to destroy the country. that is , after re-registration, we must remove these political parties because they violate the law, and secondly, we make political parties real forces. uh,

the requirements that political parties in the new legislation. this is for example 5,000 years. or belarusians here to such activity to joining the party. they are already in the party. that is, and this is already happening, firstly, parties cannot be separated from other public organizations. in general, the modernization of the political system. i want to say that the adoption of a law on political parties is hmm within the framework of a package of documents, and civil society, and the entire belarusian people's assembly electoral code. and one more thing that we said right now, the studio should have a decision that already exists. this is the creation of an organizing committee on the creation of a political party on foundation of a community organization. belaya rus is an extremely important decision to create a powerful large central presidential party in the country, because it is an incentive for the development of not only this party, but also the rest, because the development of belarus as a party provides opportunities for the development of the communist party, the liberal democratic party and

others. who is truly committed to constructive work. we ’ll clarify this nuance for the good of the country, consciously on the basis of white russia , that is, automatically all participants in public affairs become members parties, or it works differently, society is very wise. the decision was taken. i why it is supported by the public organization belaya rus, it unites people of different views. i know that many members of the communist party are members of belaya rus, members of the liberal democratic party work and are members of belaya rus and a public organization. belarus remains, and a political party is created on the basis of belarus. they go side by side, but this is a political force that is fighting for the power of the party, which is different from a public organization than the main task parties-a struggle for power participation in elections. and do not be afraid of this word, someone is now watching tv and saying the struggle for power, that this is chaos, isn't it? it's just a power struggle. on the street. some kind of constitutional struggle for power, not civilized, but different points of view , there should always be alternatives in the elections, and

this is all that the public association allows. they well represent that the cultural, social, uh, economic interests of citizens who are members of the public association. eh, the people who they are directly involved in political parties and, uh, the party itself represents precisely the political views of these people, therefore the innovations that have been made. what oleg sergeevich said, they are really significant, because there must be real party forces that do not just understand the president's power, for example, gaidukevich. you can't love the falcon. but there are constitutional systems. there is independence. there are the interests of the people, and we must respect them. yes, there is pro-government, we do not hide the fact that the same white russia uh, we and

the liberal-democratic party are both about power, unlike the russian federation where both the liberal democratic and communist parties are in opposition, but this constructive position, which i repeat once again, is aimed at creating precisely the country of a welfare improvement society, and let's just say it, this is the way forward. and today. we are not afraid of this, what is indicated in the law means by the number of members. eh, it was rightly said that we have enough people, there is no need to dwell on this, of course, somewhere there is a certain gradation. somewhere. uh, our members are getting old already. uh, preklo- now the size of the communist party. on average, the average voiceover is somewhere between six and six and a half thousand democratic. i won't chase numbers. here is the

competition. now it didn't work. i'll tell you a figure and someone will think that those who have fewer communists, we have more, we have different approaches, the communists have a very tough approach. e to pay the swedish contributions they really have. i want to praise them, that is, to praise them for being one of the oldest parties that really exist and that has an impact on the development of the country, we have 40,000, but i want to say right away that we have distributed party tickets since 1994. we don't have. these are real party members, but she is re-registered. we are ready, we will submit at least 10.000. e for re-registration five thousandth, and in the current political situation. he reaches, of course, and look there too. most. the main impurity in the law spelled out the task of creating organizational structures in each area. if people don't. it means what kind of parties and moreover, what kind of organizational structure in the region was registered. it is necessary to have structures in

districts and cities at least 1/3 of the region. it's, well, uh, it's a priori right? why, if a party is structured, it means that it is supported by the people and another important point. you understand that this law is a step forward for the development of political parties and the whole country. i will explain why those parties that are able to re-register for all for the people for the government for officials. it's right away it is clear that this is a real political force that must be reckoned with. we must rejoice, what is a tough law, if the communists passed this force, if we passed this force, who did not pass did not pass, so that no one would think that we want a country where different only one point of view will not do this, there is no need to be afraid of the word opposition. but what is the difference, what should we understand, we will argue in the elections from the communists from white russia and the liberal democratic party has been and will be a constructive position, but what is the question we will stand together with the falcon with the communists with

white russia and defend our country to defend national interests. his people have chosen to fight the aces to support our president. but why can't we criticize officials? as criticized so will we criticize and i very much applaud the creation. uh, the belaya rus party - this is a very important step. you do not yet understand, until someone maybe what this means, now the political field will be structured over time. here is the ruling party. it's not a bad word centrist powerful strong, supporting the president. there are communists on the left flank. there is a right -wing liberal-democratic centrist party. we will try to unite other right-wing conservative patriotic forces on our base before the elections, and we will criticize and defend the country together. this is great and people will have an alternative in the elections. everyone has the right to vote. for whom you like, for whom you don’t hear , moreover, the president here unites everyone. he won over 80

% in the elections. but this does not mean that those who voted. belarus will support lukashenka in the presidential elections in the parliamentary elections . many of them will support communism. they support lukashenko and the communists will be supported by the parliament. it will be more interesting , the most important thing in a civilized way, because here i will translate it into a simple one. an example we are arguing here here we will argue the studios like a falcon, and the theories of marseilles, lenin figuratively, i say, something else for the sake of god, someone will say a word to our country from poland and the saint together. you say, let's get up in the face, i'll fill it, you can do some social studies. what is the level of trust in the party among the people now, because, well, everything looks beautiful 5,000 people. a. well, i want to tell you that the rating or the level of trust is growing every year. previously, he was somewhere in the middle of everything alexei sergeevich, somewhere within 20% today. somewhere around 27, closer to 30%. here, uh, the rating is

zero when it comes to destructive parties. yeah, we didn't deal with political parties. it couldn't be, uh, head of state. eh, in these two years, all his words have come true. he never said do not artificially make these political european ways. you don’t even have to go your own way, even the russian way, so we, for example, will have a russian assembly above everything. this is extreme. it ’s good if someone starts playing politics with the leaders of political parties, including the entire belarusian assembly, quickly grounds and puts it in its place. this is the highest body of democracy in the country, fine, but at the same time , the law on political parties, the law on civil society, these are the pillars and the decision to create a party on the basis. white russia - this will be an incentive for the development of parties. this was not there before. now, after the adoption of these decisions, several years will pass and you will see that the political reality will be completely different. i want to say the words of lukashenka again. so he always said, uh, and

part of the people kept his word in the twentieth year. i wanted political reforms, but guys, not on the street, and the most amazing thing. here they are , the president kept his word, despite the fact that the war is on, despite the fact that the sanctions, despite the fact that it would seem, what development of the people of power. what kind of development of democracy should be clamped down now, the president is still going. uh, as the person who keeps his word, we develop both people 's power and democracy. that's all that we have now discovered, you understand the main platform for discussion. it should not be on the street, but on the basis of the parliament of the council of the republic, where every political force can express its point of view. e in terms of the functioning of government bodies in terms of the development of certain bills. that there is uh, really. here is e. well, let's say that in order to move, of course, of course, and you

understand this modern society, and what about street squabbles. well, it's like this below, this all does not happen. and i want to add even more that an important change, even if a political party is registered, but in the process of its activity will be monitored, in addition to the fact that we said destructive effectiveness or to undermine national institutions and the constitutional order, which means uh, deadlines. when will e powers. whose all these have been liquidated, that's all, an unregistered political party has no right, uh, to conduct any activity, yes, the territory of the republic, belarus, this is also very important. in connection with this change, as you can see, the upcoming parliamentary elections, we have elections in one data

constituency. this is what people should know. we do n't have elections based on party lists, so it's still, uh, the election methodology itself. she remains the same. we will know the person, which means that this is important. this is also important, of course i don't hide. we have different opinions. for example, i was and remain a supporter of the proportional majority system. this is part of the deputies. in my opinion, they should be elected according to party lists, the only thing i fully agree with the head of state. he always answered these proposals that it would be somewhat artificially premature now. but i think we will come to this and the first step in the law has been taken. we removed some restrictions from the constitution. she further changes the electoral system on the professional floor. well twenty the fourth year, elections in one data constituency, but something has changed and very significantly the first electoral codes. he is updated, he is democratic for the second single day. for the first time, we elect deputies of all levels on the same day, the third moment everything

will be re-registered in accordance with the law on political parties, and only those parties that have been re-registered and are a political force under the new legislation will come to the elections. they still have this priority right to nominate candidates for deputies without collecting signatures. that is do you have a choice, the most important thing is that in the elections it is for people to have a real choice. and i think that's what we're doing now. well, the fourth point is the last important one. this is that the entire belarusian assembly will stand above all of us, as the highest representative body of the people of power, which will actually ensure that any political discussion, and crosses the twenty-fourth year. in what year the 25th presidential election did not pass the constitution and the law, and i also want to say very importantly, and this is always about stressed the head of state. we are going. we are moving forward today, taking into account that the draft law has already been considered and approved; it is important that we do not make the mistake of our

neighbors in russia, let's say. how many political parties, especially before the spoiler party elections? uh-huh it's terrible, you see, when people don't know who to vote for, who to choose next, one central party, which is the dominant dominant, but still , uh, parties are formed with spoilers that are taken away from both the dominant and the liberal democratic and communists vote. this is the first. second, we have to look. it's just negative, to put it mildly , the experience of ukraine look, i don't remember more than 260 games from memory. they have created something there. this is chaos the name is chaos. uh, so we have to take it easy. i 'm sure in time we'll calmly given. we will still be able to work out a mechanism for our immediate and distant neighbors to

switch to a mixed electoral system, in general in connection with these changes. is there a surge of political activity expected, maybe there will be some new parties. the very fact. here, for example, uh, it means that the decision to create a party based on belarus is, by the way, not just a decision made. and just because of the surge in political activity, belarusians became more active after the twentieth year. they are not indifferent. we see various initiatives. and now, just the same time is such a real, e constructive creative policy. and someone else is afraid. why do we need parties? for what? she is generally something friends of my country, where everyone has one opinion does not happen. and if it doesn't there will be no discussion in parliament of different points of view, there will be no political disputes, including no forward movement. if there is no discussion, everything dead should not be like this. therefore, we must extract noah's mistakes. that's right, a colleague said. in russia, they also led political parties at the beginning, only

the party lists saw that they had broken away from the people and switched to a proportional majority system of elections. uh, but without a party then, where is politics next politics on the street, if people cannot realize themselves political parties, if we accept that people have the right to have different points of view within the framework of the constitution. for example, we have different views on the economy. we are not going to say that all of one opinion does not happen. you are in the family, come home. the husband has one opinion, the wife has the second. my mother-in-law has a third and everyone listen to find a compromise comes, the head of the family slammed his fist on the table, he says it will be like this, but he listened to everyone i translate into belarusian. we've been arguing parks and leaders and we'll be arguing hard, come the president, according to the constitution, with a fist, bitch, whoever doesn’t want to work, everyone ran to work, and a russian assembly is standing over them, if someone is like this, if a wife brings a family to the family, she ran to the left, her russian

assembly immediately by the scruff of her neck and on place, but i’m transferring to politics , if the leader of the party played too much, win these political ones, we will quickly put him in our place, you see, democratic centralism acts like in the country, like rules and law in the communist party. that is, there are questions; there is a problem; it is discussed by region, by place. all levels. all discussion has gone to the highest genus. and here is how sergeevich said on the table. this is how the whole country decides. here, god forbid, i will lower the officials now in the places of the president of such a team. the thought will never come up that everyone was a million percent of the party of belarus, they can start right now, so that they would not do ahead, there should be different points of view, when you know the communists, they should communicate with us, communicate, listen, we will express our opinion then the country will move these 5,000. very important. we are last year.

here are the political parties that support both the head of state and the course that is being pursued, uh, the public association is precisely such weighty mass ones. we created what e patriotic union, and we are today. here we go, we all go together, that is, we have some kind of problem, there is still. something we're about to. here is the last time at the base. e white russia gathered and discuss this problem. we are developing, let's say, an action plan, joint activities that, uh conducted and will continue to be conducted. that is, this is also we show people that it is not just the communist party or the liberal democratic party, for example, on their own. and we say that there are many of us united front. yes, absolutely true, but there are nuances in the law. as for the prohibition of party financing from abroad, how can parties secure themselves such injections,

where do they get money from? uh, what oleg sergeevich at the beginning of the program said the event has a lot planned for each party. eh, just spend, well, i understand that every event costs funding. but where then, where to get the money? well, uh, i'm saying what was said about us. we, uh, pay membership dues. so, that is, the party finances itself. your yes, that is, uh, we uh, we can also maintain offices. we can carry out real events, what we have enough of these funds for, then we have a printing house. that is, we have the right to engage in publishing activities. and yet, we are not doing it yet, but we will be doing it. this is the implementation and various abbreviations. that's it as for the party of the times of the ussr, for example, that is, here is such a plan. merchant activity, unlike public associations, is forbidden to political parties, which is why, and the fact that funding

is correct, how can a party express an opinion or act in the interests of the state, if uncle son allocates millions of dollars? under this tune, they will meet the national interests with such funding. if you took even a penny from poland or america you work for this country and ask people a question like leaders parties. here are some radical ones who have now fled abroad for 10-15 years and are not working anywhere. how is that possible, here is the leader of the communist party working. i always work, there was never a day that the work book was not somewhere and where they were carried out. uh, functional responsibilities, how can this be the first second funding. we are well aware of the politics of this finance. the main thing is that these finances should be only belarusian in law. there is another important change in political parties, we have lifted the ban on financing political

parties from local republican budgets. there is such an opportunity, but i will immediately explain to people, they will ask. are you gathered now? let's go party money handing out these 15 no, and close. now no one will get anything now the parties will exist. at their own expense, at the expense of members of their parties, that is, someone brought a sofa, someone brought a pen, someone rented an office. someone else did something, but in the future, of course, after the development of the political system, when the re-registration of the elections takes place, what criteria will how much what to give there in general, in principle, only to the party that the people support and in fact will finance it. all the same, the voter, as in the whole world. there is simply some kind of system that is being created in the future, but not now. it will again be artificial, and the head of state correctly said that it does not live artificially. it won't survive. here you can take money now to please everyone, do the park well? and how to realistically calculate who is supported more, who has more money in the elections, elections are one way elections. and how many

percent voted for whom. here are our spain yes, the parliament and local councils, which means how many deputies how many gained percent. here we have one system of circles, you can’t just watch the deputation, because, for example, somewhere 15% 18% of candidates were recruited. this is a serious support figure, so these are just elections. how much the party is popular among the people is the only criterion. we have already talked about the ban on funding from abroad. however, certainly political parties have connections with their counterparts in other countries, with whom you communicate most closely and what benefits can be derived from this. well, i will say this, i am like a belarusian politician and deputy. uh, i don't have friends abroad. i believe that there are colleagues to cooperate with everyone nearby. eh, where there are national interests of belarus the fact is that the world has changed a lot. uh, here is the political left, which used to be left, is no longer left in europe, but it is not clear who is right - this is wrong. but

it’s not clear who, for example, my party is called liberal democratic, but we had nothing to do with western liberalism, so we have our own belarusian liberalism with a hint of the ministry of internal affairs and the kgb, which means it's wonderful. here is such a good belarusian liberalism, but i'm not talking about that. i believe that just the same, the development of the political system of parties will contribute to international cooperation. i will give a simple example in all foreign parliaments. there are factions. uh, factions of various parties. and when the deputies come there they are asked. what political force do you adhere to, but everything is very fast is changing. anyone who has it is clear that they are now developing a leftist movement. uh, the communists come to power in many countries. the left is coming along nicely. isn't the communist party developing these relations? this is good. we try to communicate with the entire spectrum of political forces in europe and right centrist with those who are ready to work together with belarus in our common interests. i want to say that the communist party of belarus, uh, mutually.