[000:00:00;00] outside the earthquake zone, hotel rooms are being opened for evacuees in russia, they are considering the possibility of transferring the maritime transshipment complex of the bronchi to belarus, st. petersburg, at present, it is capable of handling more than 3 million tons per year, and the design capacity of the complex exceeds 20.5 million tons per year also bronka provides good conditions for the transportation of goods to the port, which is located in the northwest and south of russia. as noted in the russian foreign ministry, thanks to an intergovernmental agreement on supplies to export of oil products produced in belarus through russian ports. last year, 3.5 million tons were shipped. in the uk, priests will now bless same-sex marriages, couples came to this decision by the general synod of the anglican church after a heated debate, the new rule applies only to families that have officially registered their

relationship. marry them. as before , the teachings about the holy matrimony, as about the union between one man and one woman for life, will not change. first blessing one fell- same-sex couples could take place as early as this summer. snow, rain and strong wind , forecasters predict such weather for the weekend in belarus. gusts are expected in most parts of the country tomorrow. winds will reach 18 m/s at night to minus one eight degrees during the day from three frosts to 4 heats on sunday. uh, the cyclone will move east. at night, even more of the republic remains in the genital part, a strong gusty, north-western wind and short-term precipitation persist. mainly in the form snow. the air temperature in the morning will drop to -3 ° in the south of the country and to -10 in the north

at the beginning of the next week we will feel the warm breath of spring in some places across the country it will rain and sleet in some areas fog on the roads sleet at night up to six frosts in the daytime up to three heats in belarus 1 factor over 60+ tonight, amateurs and professionals of elegant age will meet on the same stage and prove that life after 60 is just beginning according to the results of the audition. yes, and stages or castings, allowed 20 artists, with the whole country. the first seven will perform today. of these, only four will go through the next stages, the semi-finals will be decided by the judges. more information about my colleagues 15 hours, but on this i say goodbye to you all

a good and pleasant evening. good evening, this is the economic environment in belarus, one of the satellite tv channels belarus 24. today we will talk on a very sensitive topic of taxation. changes for entrepreneurs, individuals and legal entities, have already been discussed on internet resources without innuendo. we we will dot the and together with competent guests. so what will change for taxpayers, we will definitely find out, and we will also consider the belarusian taxation system as a whole, how it looks against the background of the fiscal systems of foreign countries,

is the updated one really more fair and what tasks for the country allow us to solve the taxes we pay? let's figure it out. today we have experts in the studio who are well versed in tax issues. and like everyone else, we pay taxes sergey nalivaika minister of taxes and duties of belarus sergeya nikhovovsky member of the standing committee of the council of the republic on economics, budget and finance general director of the kommunarka confectionery factory elena kireyeva first projector of the belarusian state economic university doctor of economics professor, dear guests. good evening taxes. it is an integral part of any state. they are very varied. we know this well, therefore we decided to divide our

discussion into three conditional blocks, let's talk about taxes dedicated to individuals, highlighting individual individual entrepreneurs and entities. m farms, well , since we meet on the site of the main television channel of the country , the most popular type of tax , personal income tax, is of particular interest to us, it is paid by everyone who receives income. so how much do people with incomes in the west pay and in which countries the figures are the highest answers in our next story, please. no matter how much a person earns in most cases, it will seem to him that the tax burden in the country is not justified, it is high. this after all, it is natural to count your money, forgetting the public interest, it is common for many, however, it is taxes that help not only maintain and develop the state, but also protect vulnerable segments of the population. the history of the tax system is as old as

the civilization of the first documented mention of tax collections recorded as early as the 18th century bc in babylon in the world using several approaches to calculating income tax. the most popular flat scale and progressive flat provides a fixed percentage of income. no matter how much an employee received 100 dollars or 100,000, the tax rate is the same, such a scale is used, and when using a progressive scale, the tax rate depends on the income of a citizen, the higher the income, the higher the percentage, so in sweden the minimum tax is 20% of earnings. and this is not the limit. the rate rises depending on the amount can reach 52%, in neighboring finland figures. even higher, almost 57% of the british, the minimum tax rates are 20% on income up to

35,000 pounds 40 on income up to 150,000 and 45%. for even higher income. but france is considered a country with one of the most stringent tax systems, the french themselves constantly complain about the amount of their taxes, and some of them even run away to other countries and pay taxes there, but the main feature of the income tax in france is that it is taken to calculate non-specific individual, and it is very unprofitable for a household in the country to be single and childless taxes will be the highest when earning up to 26.000 euros per year, the tax rate will be 14% up to 72.000 30 everything that above 153.000 euros 41%. but if the frenchman is rich, please be kind for another from 250 to 500.000 euros

3% tax in addition to 500.000 euros four, but the famous tax on millionaires, according to which the state took away 75% of the income of those with incomes over 1 million euros. a similar system in the us taxes there also depend on the size of the family. true balances range from 10% to nearly 40%, with the top 5 countries with the highest income tax rates being the divoire code. there people give away sixty percent of their income in second place. finland is almost 57% further than japan and denmark is there for an income tax of almost 56%. and austria closes the rating with 55% the figures are impressive, that is , people transfer up to 60% of their income in the form of tax, but sergey eduardovich and what does the taxation system for individuals look like in belarus and what

changes have occurred in it since the new year? well, you know, you were absolutely right in saying that the tax on income is the most massive tax that applies to almost everyone who receives income. here is a significant part of uh, changes in tax legislation in twenty-third year, they didn’t touch it at all, because we have an income tax rate. it has already been indirectly indicated here. she, uh, flat was 13% and is 13%, i want to pay attention. which, by the way, is one of the lowest income tax rates. e in europe and if we take those benefits and tax deductions that are provided e, in accordance with the law, then we estimated the effective income tax rate, the so-called it drops below 11%, in general, if we take

the country, uh, the changes affected eh , current year. first of all, individual entrepreneurs. i mean income tax changes. and here it is also no hmm not a super innovation, no surprise at all. in my opinion, this is a thing, to be honest, for a long time, announced that for individual entrepreneurs the taxation system will change from january 1, 23. we have passed the next stage of these changes. and i think the most radical here and the most important is the most significant. probably this is the introduction of a new mechanism, the so-called tax on professional income yeah, that is, this digital platform, when any citizen who is engaged in those types of activities that are defined in the resolution of the council of ministers, he can

download this application to his gadget to reflect there, alas. about which he receives and will automatically calculate his tax liability. well, in accordance with those terms. e, when the time for payment comes, it means that he will be obliged to transfer this payment, but you noted that a special tax regime has been introduced since january 1, 23 for the self-employed tax on professional income, and the column is dreaming and what is its essence is the decree of the council of ministers. in accordance with which the list of activities is defined, and who is engaged in these activities, they can use it, and the tax on professional income and there the person, the citizen, determines for himself, or he. uh, as a self-employed person, you correctly noted that he carries out this activity, or he registers. with what individual entrepreneur and carries out this activity and pay income tax in

common established system of taxation. she, too, since january 1. mm is 20%, so it is easy for a person to sit down to count. which model of taxation is more profitable for him, which one we have to apply, but comparison, of course, of income tax rates abroad. yes, this is up to 60%, we heard in the republic of belarus yes, 13%, but, i beg your pardon. i'll just add, if we are talking about the tax on professional income, then the rate is generally 10%. uh-huh from the revenue reflected 10%. there further. it is still split, some goes directly as a tax payment, and some this amount withheld. the social protection fund is in progress, that is, in parallel with the fulfillment of the tax obligation, the citizen also fulfills his social obligations , that is, there is no need for additional reports in the calculations not only to the tax authority, but also to the social protection fund in the ministry of labor,

but in any case, uh, comparison of the tax burden on individuals, but it is in favor of our country. it is much lower with us , and you said that the effective rate is much lower due to those benefits and preferences that exist with sergei anatolyevich, we are, uh, going, uh, along the path, in fact, of abolishing certain, uh, tax benefits. there, including for individuals. i mean, uh, property taxes. e for individuals and a famous example from last year. yes, when it is necessary to pay real estate tax already for the first apartment. tell us how these decisions are combined with the implementation of the principle. yes, and justice. that's what the abolition of benefits is behind them - this is one of the factors in the implementation of social justice. and today one apartment or two apartments. there is an apartment you pay,

there are no taxes for an apartment or a house. here you pay taxes and for everyone. uh, today's conditions, approx. here is the diagram of your shows. eh, the same and the amounts are relative. they are small on their own, i know that 40-50 rubles. here they are not some such amount, which is an objection. but uh, like a tax payer, like uh, the head of the enterprise understands that the larger the withdrawal, the fewer items in the budget are not covered by sources. eh, we're all used to walking. uh, to school to the university to the clinic and we understand that all this needs to be contained and, accordingly , less removed, and e. more budget revenue, but by and large. uh, these decisions are aimed at equalizing the conditions of taxation. well in this particular example for apartment owners and apartments, yes in private houses. yes, if you allow, just

add, here you are good. in my opinion, the sample was made on income tax, i am convinced that if you made a similar sample on e land tax real estate tax on the so-called property payments, the comparison would be about the same in the benefit of our country, because well, let's call a spade a spade. after all, there are a number of countries in the same western europe well, the so -called developed country. yes, where real estate is relatively inexpensive and we see advertising to buy there, uh , you buy apartments at home, but when it comes to maintenance, including tax obligations, the numbers there, of course, go off scale and sergei anatolyevich absolutely agrees, if speak. about our country, the real estate tax rate for individuals is 0.1%. well for the most part, it's about nothing. it is also the same regardless of the value of the property, and here i think you very

correctly drew attention to social justice, for some reason a person who owns a house, uh, some uh, well, a simple ordinary small house, he was the payer of the object. no, there is no real estate tax, and the owner of one apartment is also the owner of this property. he didn't show up, therefore. eh, if we talk again here about taxation, then you correctly noted. we just left. from this benefit, equalized these conditions and now all citizens of our country are in the same conditions or fedorovna. please tell us how you assess the state of tax literacy of our people, and it is at a high level, or we still have something to work on, because here, preparing for transmission. uh , i had to read various sources , i got the impression that there, well, everyone is too literate, because they openly discuss tax avoidance schemes , tax avoidance is a criminal offense. we do not recommend anyone to do this. so

here is the state of tax literacy, whether we have high or low tax literacy, generally a very interesting term, because tax literacy. this is not primarily about how to pay taxes and how we know how to pay. taxes, tax literacy are part of the tax culture. it's actually, uh, tax literacy. this is trust in the state. it is an understanding of one's rights and obligations to taxpayers. yes, in some part e study of tax legislation is included in tax literacy. well the more we have to say that tax literacy is an understanding and trust of the state understanding of tax policy, the tax system that the taxpayer not only pays taxes, but also finances his own social programs and social guarantees. uh, now uh, tax literacy uh is, well, i would say already

at such a serious level, because, starting from educational schools, there are optional classes on tax literacy. e hmm significant in this e significant share or significant value is adopted by the education system, starting from schools and secondary specialized institutions of higher education. e, practically everywhere in the economic profile total in the economic profile. e, we are approaching the study of taxation programs. but this is such a qualifying component, as far as the general informational position is concerned, here it is unconditional. this and that's what we have gathered now is an increase in tax literacy, this is an explanation on the websites of the ministry of taxes and duties of state bodies and information media mass media are actively involved in

certain explanations on tax legislation. and uh, according to the services that are used, therefore, uh, tax literacy is not about how to evade taxes, tax literacy is about how to understand tax laws. in any case, uh, seeking to understand these issues are our people. yes, our neighbors have all the possibilities. there is the internet there is a website of the ministry of taxes and duties it is very informative, for example, there is all legislation question answer all possibilities. for this there is. but, if we complete the block of questions on the taxation of individuals and move on to individual entrepreneurs. here, sergei noted that there have been significant changes in the tax regime for individual entrepreneurs, but if consistently , this is the essence of these changes. well, if, uh , go in stages, then, probably, the most

significant and hmm caused a stir, let's say , in the business environment. this, of course , is the abolition of the simplified taxation system for individual entrepreneurs, and reduction in the activities of hmm for the payment of a single tax and an increase in this single tax rate for the remaining types of activities. so, here too, in my opinion. everything is very predictable and consistent. the first thing i want to pay attention to is the simplified taxation system and hmm the single tax for individual entrepreneurs is special taxation regimes that were introduced temporarily so that the business could somehow develop to its feet and then , as it grows, switch to the generally established taxation system and not create unlawful tax competition for e-e

large respectable economic entities. unfortunately, for many years. and we observed that these special regimes were used not to get back on their feet, but to obtain, let’s say, undue tax advantages over bona fide economic entities, therefore , such a decision was made to first reduce the types of activities for individual entrepreneurs that can be carried out using a simplified taxation system, and starting from the current year generally get away from these activities, but in my opinion. again, this is not detrimental. e, economic entities, they can either carry out, as i said, types of activities, or by paying taxes according to the general established system of taxation , if they fall under those types of activities that are determined by the councils of ministers, they can register as payers of tax on professional income or that in

my opinion, the most correct way is to register a legal entity. and there at them again, if the choice is either they can pay a simplified taxation system at a rate of 6% or pay general e-taxes under the general established taxation system. well, keeping track of income costs. uh-huh and all the other components we did the analysis uh, 2,000 in 2013 there was uh, a reduction in the rate, uh, under the simplified taxation system a little bit in history, of course, but they were reduced there. shops 7% to five, and then a business union a number of business unions is it's all fixed, you made commitments that you gave us just lower those rates. we will create in a year we will create at least 20,000 jobs with wages of 500 dollars, they kept their promise not

over. eh, all these years, not a single year. no more create want to say from sole proprietors today. no wages 500 dollars average wages for individual entrepreneurs who applied the simplified taxation system 540 rubles. not dollars an attempt to evade unconditionally. that is, when lobbying some interests are promised, then they are not kept, just like talking about social responsibility about politics. e about the ability to agree to comply with obligations , it must be noted that many individual entrepreneurs. the simplified taxation system was abused, which often led to violations related to the cashing out of funds and tax evasion, the cash thus obtained was used, among other things, to finance anti-state manifestations, on the other hand, similar

the tax regime was frankly preferential for individual entrepreneurs and it is time to grow out of short pants and start working in conditions in which all legal entities work, bear the full tax burden and social responsibility , and our president drew attention to the need to eliminate distortions and equalize tax conditions. let's get a look. that's decided that the individual entrepreneur should rise to a higher level and how all there individuals and legal entities pay. the taxes made the decision these exceptions are some individual entrepreneurs. we looked at them. bourgeois e much larger than those who today pull factories, the same amkodor , for example, and so on, compare with individual entrepreneurs, heaven and earth, so here we already have distortions. well, it is necessary to work in a civilized way, artisans will remain, who, uh

, exclusively do something with their own hands and will sell at the price at which they can sell these are unique people whom we must support artisans. these we agreed to leave, and everyone else must pay taxes, as expected. it is during this there time period of this year. there are a few more months. we will bring this into line so as not to offend anyone, the time has come and the simplified taxation system for individual entrepreneurs has been cancelled. tell sergeevich whether the ministry of blogging and collection, well, monitors such decisions of individual entrepreneurs. now we can already say that they are flowing much more. what category do we certainly control and analyze these flows. for us. this is extremely important and interesting and necessary. eh, it's another matter that you correctly say after a quarter,

somewhere by the end of the month of april. we can give an objective picture. what happened, because it happens that a business entity as an individual entrepreneur during january determined which taxation system he would use. and we have a taxation system. hmm, if we are talking about the general taxation system, when a quarterly declaration is submitted, the declaration will be submitted in april. so after the twentieth of april. we will see it, and then we will be able to count, let's say, this individual entrepreneur and the end of april. we will already have a complete picture of which of the individual entrepreneurs, which path elena fedorovna preferred , please tell me, here you are, as a well-known scientific methodologist, yes, in the field of developing tax systems. don't you see the risks of leaving many individual entrepreneurs to the shadow sector of the economy. and what risks can be associated with such decisions? well

, of course, it's certainly a very interesting question. shadow economy. it existed exists in almost all countries, regardless of the level of development of this country. and for some reason, we have, uh, thinks that, in general, the shadow economy. it is based on. e, some specific it or a hard investment tax, nothing like that, that is, there is a certain category of people who will always look for ways to avoid taxes in the shadow economy. uh, more to do with the problems associated with it. with the rational development of e with the creation of bureaucratic barriers with the impossibility of acquiring some goods and services, that is, taxes, of course, are present in this system and in some part of the business, including, what are you talking about, small business, it still risks , as long as it can be profitable for it but on the other hand, when

a certain hmm forgiveness is created. in particular. here, sergey eduardovich spoke quite a lot today about the tax on professional income, when, in principle, such a form is provided for individuals, uh, organizing the participation of tax authorities in practice, replacing all accounting for them for uh, entrepreneurs from the tax authorities. this simplifies tax administration, and we certainly understand that in some part, if an individual entrepreneur or physical. a person shares his risks, it is obviously easier for him not to deal with taxation at all, but to use the system that is currently more acceptable for him. and in particular, that mobile application about professional income. it allows you to take it off. uh, part of the labor for these individuals is to release them. as a matter

of fact, these are the problems that they themselves would i would probably create it for myself if they started to go into some kind of shady business sergey anatolyevich, please tell me, here you are, as a senator, people certainly come to the reception. you visit the regions, talk with representatives of electronics, enterprises and individuals, including individual entrepreneurs. tell people care. uh, questions about taxation about these changes that have taken place ask you these questions. and if you take it more broadly, people understand these changes. of course, the question. i'm sorry sergeevich i think what is not in the top is exactly the question in the top housing and communal services of the road - this is what is the top, but entrepreneurs often ask questions. i always ask in conversation. and how old are you as entrepreneurs and when a person says 5 10 15 tons in five years. uh, anyway, if he does not create conditions, then

he will remain an entrepreneur, in fact, this is an artisan, as we call them today. and in our republic there are many examples when entrepreneurs from one store turned into a network structure for 10 for 15 years have grown from one barber shop there to all salons. eh, here, that is, the one who grows, he, of course, will transfer and find forms of ownership for himself today in order to conduct a decent business. and when, after five and 10 years, he is one entrepreneur, there is one legal entity, the person is another legal entity, and already there are doubts whether this entrepreneur is able to conduct honest business with the state compete with large enterprises compete in the market of the republic compete outside republic we are always questions that behold we ask narrow addresses to them at the territorial services of the ministry of taxes and they already give a professional answer. we must

understand very well that not everyone can be businessmen and entrepreneurs, of course, sometimes we are. unfortunately. after all, a person does not succeed in business. yes, the tax system of the state is to blame, anyone else, but not him, but we must understand that this is a rather narrow plast of people. this is a special category of people who are given to engage in gallant enterprises , unconditionally, unconditionally, therefore, here, er. well, of course, it's easier to nod or shove someone there. and it's even easier to say that there's a bad tax system there, or someone else is to blame, sergei eduardovich approached a very interesting question very fairly. and timely of course, we need to explain to our viewers. why the topic of tax changes is so actively promoted by separate information resources, we will call them destructive. that's why non-friendly forces are so actively escalating the situation with a change

in taxation, and there is destruction. ip someone predicts how class and problems with the formation of the budget and the effects of sanctions against our country that people just do not come up with because there are simply no meaningful reasons for these panic moods. moreover, you are absolutely correct, because the tax issue is one of the elements that these destructive elements pull out and use. yes, that is, there are a number of others, but this topic is always hot hot. it is easy, as if warming up, and, uh, with all responsibility i declare that the overwhelming for the most part, the meaning is distorted when this information is presented. hmm, therefore, that is , some things are not agreed upon, some things are deliberately held back. and here comes the negative. well, if once again

, as an example, let's even take the same real estate tax, the taxation of apartments. hmm, for many years we have been saying again, the real estate tax rate for individuals, it is unchanged 0.1% but these 0.1% are applied to the tax base, that is, to the cost of one meter with an increase in value meters, but the tax itself is certainly growing, yes, but the rate itself does not change , but it’s always like this everywhere, but for some reason they pushed it out in our country, which means that with an increase there by 11, in my opinion, percent m-m of the cost of a meter square. it means that already ah-ah-ah guard, uh, real estate tax payments will also increase, which means that, firstly, i want to take this opportunity to say that in 2023 no property taxes will rise, because the cost of 1 m. adopted in 2020 the second year. we are all

citizens who paid an advance payment for this apartment was partly paid. last year , they will make an additional payment of 23, that is, that's why meters have risen in price. let's say. so the tax will go next in 2024. in fairness, if we talk about minsk , then even this is an increased cost, let's say, it is three times less than the market price. well , this is the one who carries the destructive. uh, there's an expression in muddy water, uh, fish, easier to catch, and so they create this background for what someone creates who has enjoyed tax evasion for years and understands today with the development of technology. it is becoming more and more transparent. well, and , accordingly, they want to continue the same regime that was 10-20 years ago, but we have already outgrown this regime a long time ago and have entered a completely different digital dimension, which allows us to track all this. well, again

this traditional recommendation. you do not need to believe everything that is written in internet resources of dubious origin. there are official portals. there are official state media, there is a deputy. there are specialized specialists in the corps, there is an opportunity to find out something within the framework of the appeal of citizens, there are many options, so the information must be shown absolutely correctly to speak from the point of view of communication in general. i have my own opinion. i will say the communication of citizens with states with our state with government agencies. but, in my opinion, such an already built system that somewhere some citizens even abuse it. here i absolutely agree with you. there is such a wording, too, she went. i understand from hmm media right information hygiene. well, what you are talking about is definitely understand who to listen to. what to listen to and in

these aspects, i'll be honest with him. maybe i'll deviate a little from the topic. uh, you have to listen to the president when you are talking even within the framework. i think my colleagues will agree with me. some informing you give simple examples about food security. he said when yes, somehow everyone was so bewildered, can they buy us? well, go buy something else about the construction of a nuclear power plant , he said, well, who turned out to be right prokovidnye things, he said and turned out to be the whole world and these are the moments. here you type, yes hmm, that's all, here, listen to the president. and you don't have to listen. this one, uh, the whole stream, uh, chernukha or whatever it is. ha, this is an important informational hygiene. absolutely true, but the block of questions about individual entrepreneurs must be stated that there are changes in the taxation regime for our entrepreneurs. this is an evolutionary path to civilized work in modern conditions. and this is not a spontaneous decision, but a balanced and

thoughtful step. after all, we all have to to adapt to the new requirements of the time, as it is to work in a new way and is marina romanovskaya escala realistic? answers let's see. i realized that the moment had come to realize my own, as if nothing so small, to open my own business. well, i wanted something that would benefit people, and when i saw that we were opening a new shopping center , because this is a chance, aleksey tropukh easily remembers preferences, he opened a coffee shop for regular visitors less than six months ago and did not lose the cozy place is popular in hometown start own business speaks, as in making coffee. the main thing is nothing not to miss working according to all the rules for boris with a legal education, the moment of principle, before. than to receive a subsidy from the state was trained further in the shock of knowledge. there on taxes on marketing, on many other disciplines. it helped a lot, then later on. i have already arrived with

a ready business plan. i work and, like any conscious, responsible citizen, i understand that our health is our roads and so on. now we are off business as well as this. you can't deceive customers because you can't fool the consumer, so it's nothing new for me. everything is stable. since 2023, without any unnecessary fears , individual entrepreneurs have been working according to new rules for solving more than a one-time shortage of time in the past , the state orients entrepreneurs towards a civilized approach. this also applies to trade and production, the result of work in the new format should be, first of all, simple and understandable conditions for doing business. it is important to exclude the plurality of tax regimes. this allows you to increase participation of small businesses, financing government spending and even out the burden on entrepreneurs changes in taxation. this is not a reason to be afraid

to develop your own business. confidently, anastasia has had her own retail store for many years as an individual entrepreneur, and since this year she has not hidden a cafeteria for children, so that not to miss the important , the mother with a six-month-old daughter in her arms had to scrupulously delve into the documents . that's really, really, who wants to always find a way. we want it to be a space in which it is good can bring time to the whole family and children and their parents. i want to work quietly and always when the reporting periods. i'm trying. on the very first day, there are quite a lot of individual entrepreneurs of some stores to make everything deep, and everyone creates something that either likes it or is just looking for profit. who has what interests, that's all working for the good. 100 products per day are capable of being produced at this production

site. the first machines were manual. now switched to high-tech equipment products - this is furniture in the warehouse does not linger limited liability company cooperates with large internet sites, a high rate for business and a very real goal, if you work according to the rules we participate in various tandars that allow us to increase our production. honestly, you always need to work in the market. we have not seen any more problematic problems in paying taxes. this is when something broke on the machine tools due to the short supply of raw materials there. that's the problem, and the problem is taxes. we can not see dress, as expected question. how it works further was not left unanswered with entrepreneurs, meetings are held across the country , seminars are organized, lectures, information about changes in legislation is available on the official website of the ministry of taxes and duties in social networks and instant messengers, and

while some argue and comment on changes in the virtual environment. others earn real money. we see dear experts, that for respectable taxpayers who sincerely love their country, they want to do their own business and earn funds for your family. tax changes do not create problems, and sergey eduazodovich. please tell me, turning to the question about the e-taxation regime for enterprises for such large subjects of the economy no. say, this year the income tax has increased by 2%. from eighteen to 20%. what is the reason for this and what other tax changes have been adopted for enterprises. hmm. well, you know, probably, by and large, this is what there are such major changes for legal entities that

took place in 23, what was it connected with, e.g. previous years, it was given the opportunity for local authorities to increase the income tax rate to 2%, so it turned out that three regions in our country took advantage of this right and still looked, um, did not come to the conclusion that, well, it’s more correct will. if the bet is still the same. well, we have already decided to increase it to 20%, that is, sergey anatolyevich, here's a question for you, as the head of a large factory of a large enterprise. please tell me how the increase in the income tax rate will affect the performance parameters enterprises, how will this affect selling prices for products? it will definitely not affect the selling prices in any way. here , as for the efficiency of the enterprise, well , not only through profit it is possible to evaluate the efficiency of the enterprise, there are a number of

indicators that evaluate this as the enterprise's market share expands. what is the salary level. are tax revenues from this business growing? that is, what this enterprise gives to the republic at the school, but is a taxpayer, so price increases which entrepreneurs are accustomed to, or you can look at it at the expense of revenue and think about how to increase the revenue of an enterprise, if you need a rate of return, if we are talking about efficiency, then even show more or efficiency calculations. now has changed. and that's the meaning to me, he is very impressed if the enterprise does not develop, that is, it does not invest depreciation. accordingly, it will pay more taxes if the enterprise develops and returns depreciation to the development of the enterprise, but, accordingly, according to the calculation of the consolidated efficiency, it will pay less

taxes. well, i also want to add that income tax is not a pricing tax. and when we talk about the fact that the profit will be increased by 2%. this can in no way affect the price of the price. we have something completely different. well, it's supply and demand. first of all, the establishment of price regulation for individual goods is the number of payers paying income tax. we don't have much. uh, the main share of the entrepreneurial segment. we paid just a simplified tax system was very correct. yes, special taxation regimes are separate entities. e paid, well, other types of tax payments, that is, income tax - this is mainly a tax for large business entities. first of all, state forms of ownership or commercial entities that have a significant market share and occupy a significant market share. e yes of course, the subject may

lose part of the profit, but at the current moment, in addition to the established rate in the amount of c e, 93 23 years in e. 20% we see that tax breaks on the profits that they saved, in general, the entire list of expenses that a business entity can attribute to reduce taxable profits. he's not hardened. uh, we understand that there were no more standardized expenses, which for the formation of a profit tax, too, that is , there were no other conditions that significantly changed the activities of these business entities sergey anatolyevich well, i can’t help but ask you questions from our editorial team . here's everyone else. didn't care. when are you in the republic, heard and adopted these tax changes you did not have an internal conflict you, as a senator, and you, as the head of