lose, but at the current moment e, except for the established rate in the amount of 93 lys-23 years in e. 20% we see that the income tax benefits that were they were preserved. e, in general, the entire list of expenses that a business entity can attribute to reduce taxable profits. he is hard on me . uh, we understand that there were no more standardized expenses, which also did not increase for the formation of a tax on profits, that is, there were no other conditions that significantly changed the activities of these business entities sergey anatolyevich well, i can't help but ask you a question from our editorial group. that's what everyone was very interested in. when in the republic, uh, you heard and accepted these tax changes. did you have an internal conflict between you, as a senator, and you, as the head of an enterprise? no for sure. i

know that both i and my colleagues in the council of the republic are all state people and think in terms of states and patriotic , we all understand that the filling of the budget depends on the social services that the state provides to our citizens. and if i apologize forgetful expression. the wallet will be empty, then you won’t get it from it and you won’t finance this or that event, therefore, of course, there were no such doubts and voted plus. eh, i repeat, as leaders. i understand how each article is formed and, accordingly, there are many other mechanisms to adapt to changing conditions. well, completing the block of questions about key tax changes. uh, i propose to look at a short plot of olga anishchenko's resume specifically for the economic environment. tax code, of course, not dogma and interest rates and approaches in general, if there is a strong argument

, the code reacts with amendments from the new year, frankly speaking, there were quite a few for both individuals and businesses, but that’s all, this is not only fiscal tasks for the sake of let’s figure it out. why so, let's start with perhaps the loudest know-how of 20-23 professional income tax - this is generally a novelty. it is offered to self-employed citizens who do their own small business with the right not to register an individual entrepreneur by itself without employees. in a word, for physicists. and yes it was suggested that this is not an obligation. it is possible to remain on the single tax as before, but the new mechanism is simply convenient when you download the application quickly. you just pay in income. yes, perhaps, all the reporting in any way. our citizens can simply fulfill their tax obligations without any unnecessary administrative, because all interaction will be based on a remote digital procedure, from registration to calculating the amount of taxes,

paying the amount of tax, no declarations, and so on. order confirmation. individuals who have already switched to the new tax regime in a month, realizing that they will pay 10% of their income. and if the income is solid and all 20, but i emphasize a voluntary decision in his favor, by the way, the insurance premiums of the social protection fund for the future pension, including in this tax, they are already included and this is important insurance for the future and then the tax lays down the key principle of justice because of this, including the tax authorities , explaining why transformation is important and necessary approaches to taxation for small businesses from the income received, respectively, if the income has not been received, but the tax is not paid. this is a great advantage compared to the flat tax, which required the payment of tax for the period before the start of the reading activity, the payer. could not assume the income received or not, but here there is no income. there is no obligation to pay for a year, which

also applies to individuals. increased tax on the first batch of about ten percent was an increase. the thing is, it's changed estimated cost. a square meter in different settlements, she pulled up the total amount. in any case, you will have to pay under this scheme. next year, then the rates in land tax and for the population for business have grown. a single tax for individual entrepreneurs and individuals who do not switch to professional income. grew by 2%, the budget is always focused on social spending, medicine, social education, support, this rule, without exception, for understanding spending on healthcare from the new of the year. grew 12%, education plus nearly 12 implementation of social policies. plus 17. moreover, only these three areas make up almost a fifth of the expenditure part of the budget, and all these figures are percentages. it is necessary to provide something, it is impossible to do this without raising the stakes. we all want, we are even sure that

doctors will come to our call and serve us in the clinic. the children will definitely go to school, and their parents or our grandmothers will be given pension benefits, and so on, they will definitely do it. it's on time. yes, it happens not without sin on places, but the system has been working for decades. and our taxes will not open america - this is a guarantee that it will always be so. but there are still large state investment programs for new medical institutions, for example, this is laid down, as the construction budget is also growing. not only housing, roads, security and national defense. finally, these costs. it's not a secret. have grown noticeably. we all understand why and even for individual entrepreneurs this year the simplification was completely canceled, leaving only two general tax regimes. this is a 20% income tax. and single tax the simplified system by and large was the benefits for businesses of abuses of the mass with one clear goal to minimize payments in the tax is knowledge. so by and large. changes are overdue, well, or simply in full swing, this is the people's version of the

forecast of the ministry. our business will no longer achieve for the sake of tax savings, creating a lot of individual entrepreneurs . lena fedorovna well, if we look at our tax system as a whole. here are some it performs macroeconomic functions in other words, for which we pay taxes. what state tasks are solved in this case? the two taxes are regulatory and fiscal, but if we speak in such a way that it is probably understandable. and now the main function is to ensure the economic security of the state, its stability, macroeconomic stability and taxes in this way. e form this airbag . give the opportunity to carry out

all planned projects. not only social projects economic projects allow us, uh, to function in such a fairly complex turbulent world. here, providing its citizens, its population, its enterprises, its business entities. here , certain revenue bases, and certainly what we also said today, taxes perform regulatory functions. that is, we can choose that direction. e economic, which is more priority at the moment. we can support certain business entities. e, in order to direct financial flows at the expense of tax incentives in some direction is also interesting, so i repeat once again. uh, macroeconomic stability to ensure the economic security of the social guarantee. this is what is directly or indirectly

performed by tax payments. our opponents often reproach the belarusian tax system that it is cumbersome and that tax rates are too high. although, in fact, it turns out that this is not the case, but if you look at it, in general, how it looks against the background of the fiscal systems of other states. of course, i run the risk of being objectively, but i am absolutely convinced that our system is absolutely competitive at the level of the most developed countries and to say that it is somehow superfluous, cumbersome or superfluous. reserved, i definitely wouldn't, uh, not enough. what tax code in the world spells out the principle of good faith of the taxpayer, we have it, and therefore, let the spiteful critics take it for the sake of interest. they'll just look. this is one thing in terms of rates. we also looked and compared even briefly so, and in terms of control

pressure or function. i gave examples that fold decreased. uh, this is a load, and today, uh, the automated system and databases that we have, they allow us to work very precisely and identify only those entities or those citizens who really deliberately and deliberately violate tax legislation. our tax burden is slightly more than 26% at the moment. this, of course, without a social protection fund, but you can say this is what sergei eduardovich was talking about. that it is certainly competitive, uh, compared to others. states even up to the one in the state, with which we are in a single conditioned bloc, if our tax system is now acquiring a service character as a union state. we keep saying, uh, digital services. what is a service is providing

taxpayers, uh, conscientious taxpayers, with additional services, that is, taxes become reduced by the tax office and this one is reduced. uh, uh functionality uh fiscalization, but rather aims at opportunity. uh, service provision of some additional benefits. we started talking about what is also a tax on professional income, which sits on a mobile platform. this is, strictly speaking, the state's assistance to the taxpayer so that he can organize it in this way. that is, he no longer needs tax consultants for small businesses, he can safely rely on the help of the state, which, on his own, will take and collect taxes for him, that is, in fact, we are talking about, well, such digitalization, yes, that is, electronic services are included in our tax life. please tell us when we will be able to switch to full

digitalization of e-tax administration. well, you know the question is, of course, such an interesting one. hmm, we have such a task. it is set by the head of state, and we are ready for the tax system. it probably won't be immodest. e more than many are ready for digitalization, even in some part more than economic citizens, but hmm unfortunately, but this automation and the transition to digital largely depends on how relevant are the database information resources that we use, because, well, i'll give you an example. the information provided by the state traffic inspectorate for the calculation of transport tax is of rather high quality. here, unfortunately, we have a problem with, uh, calculating land tax on real estate, they are being resolved, but, unfortunately, as quickly as we would like, therefore, given that there is a very large segment and the circle of these information bases, with which we cooperate, it

is extremely important for us that these databases are up-to-date, so that they are reliable, but on our part. well, there is readiness, and we see how we need to move. uh, i can present it like this, probably, the next stage. hmm, which we set for ourselves . that is, it will not be necessary to pay separately for one property for land tax. uh, transportation tax. that is, it will be possible for a citizen to pay with one payment by pressing one button. it is very comfortable. very convenient sergey cooking can not help but ask you. in insight exclusive information for the economic environment, should we expect any major changes in tax legislation in the near future? and if so, what are these innovations that are in demand in the country today, or we have already perfected the tax system. well, nothing is

perfect, so this is firstly, and secondly, life dictates. it was right in your story that it was said somewhere that the tax code is not a dogma, but it changes, in accordance with how the world is changing, if we talk about the position of the ministry of taxation, i i think my colleagues will agree with me. we are in favor of stability, and i think, i am convinced that an increase in the receipt of payments should be sought on the path of expanding the tax base; they are on the path of raising the tax rates themselves. it is along this path. we are moving forward and what we discussed today, there is also a departure from part of the benefit. this is just the expansion of bass taxation in order not to raise rates, so i think, i'm convinced that if everything goes like this , everything will be stable as we plan, then no such sudden gestures

will not happen, but there are some, well, i don’t know the polishing, but this is life dictates, so i have already said something and i think you will agree with me. you don’t make decisions on these decisions, there is a wide discussion of the economic entity, citizens are not involved in this process, therefore this is not some kind of classified information, therefore well, i don’t see such global prerequisites for any radical changes. today, i summarize our conversation dear colleagues. you have the opportunity to contact taxpayers. and once again focus on the most important aspects. and so taxes are a burden or a tool for solving common problems. well, it depends, of course, on the attitude of a person to this issue, whether it is time or a tool, so i take this opportunity to want. i would like to wish everyone, of course, good peace, peace of mind, confidence in the future. i want to wish

prosperity and wealth, as it may not sound unusual, and i want to assure that no one wishes taxes more sincerely than a tax official - this is responsibility. our civil social responsibility and a citizen and an enterprise that operates in the market and we are competitive in the export market. so, many hit russia and many enterprises in our republic to compete in other markets. and, accordingly, our tax system. she 's competitive, that's the conclusion. yes, as manufacturing workers from the real sector did , the level of tax literacy determines the level of civilized society. we all want to live in a sterilized society, so i am for tax literacy. thank you for your opinion, we thank our guests and say goodbye to you. live through and pay taxes and then the economic environment will be favorable for you, goodbye.