my colleague also participated, the two of us sat on the composition of the expert council that developed this law. and i really want to note that the drafters of the bill really came from the party, from the people , from the party, and not from above. that is, what the parties wanted, then, in principle, they laid down in this law that two main aspects are changing . i would like to note the first one is the requirements for political parties and the streamlining of the country's political field. we have to clean up there. today we have on registration. here in the country there are 15 political parties, of which only a few others actually operate either on paper, or, even worse, are destructive political forces that oppose their own constitution against their own constitution against their own people. someone called for sanctions, someone called for mass riots, and someone lived for decades at someone else's expense at the expense of external financing. didn't work anywhere. these parties

received money from there, work books are empty and, uh, they did everything before the destruction of the country, that is we these political parties must remove it for june after registration. they can not. yes, they will not pass, because they break the law. second, we are making the political parties real forces. uh, the requirements that political parties have new legislation. this is for example 5,000 years belarusians. here's to such activity joining the party. they are already in the party. that is, and this is already happening in the first place, it is impossible to separate the party from other public organizations in the whole modernization of the political system. i want to say that the adoption of the law on political parties. this e is within the framework of a package of documents, and civil society, and all the belarusian people's assembly of the electoral code. and one more thing that we said right now the studio should make is the decision that already exists is the creation of an organizing committee to create a political party on the basis of a public organization. belaya rus this is an extremely important

decision to create a powerful large central presidential party in the country, because this is an incentive for the development of not only this party, but also the rest, because the development of white russia as a party gives opportunities for the development of the communist party of the liberal democratic party and others. who is truly committed to constructive work for the good of the country. let's clarify this nuance, and consciously, on the basis of white russia , that is, automatically all participants in public conduct become members of the fingers. that's very wise. the decision was made. i why it is supported by the public organization belaya rus, it unites people of different views. i know that many members of the communist party belong to belaya rus, members of the liberal democratic party work and are part of belaya rus and a public organization. belarus remains, and on the basis of white russia a political party is being created. they go side by side, but this is a political force that fights for the power of the party , which is different from a public organization.

son, the main task of the party is the struggle for power , participation in elections and there is no need to be afraid of this word . someone is now watching tv and saying the struggle for power is not chaos? there's just a power struggle in the streets an unconstitutional power struggle, no civilized, but different points of view , there should always be an alternative in the elections, and this is all that the public association allows. they basically represent that cultural social. uh, the economic interests of citizens who are members of a public association. uh, people are those who belong to political parties. they are directly and, uh, the party itself represents precisely the political views of these people, therefore, those innovations that have been made, what oleg sergeevich said, u said, they are really significant, because uh there must be real party forces who do not just understand the president's power. for

example, gaidukevich sokol may not be loved, but there is a constitutional system. there is independence, there are the interests of the people, and we must respect them. yes, there is pro-government. we do not hide the fact that the same white russia , e, are pro-government, and we and the liberal democratic party, unlike the russian federation, where the liberal democratic and communist parties are, as it were, in opposition, but this constructive position, which once again i repeat, it is aimed at building the country's society, increasing welfare, and let's say it this way, this is the way forward. and today. we are not afraid of this, what is indicated in the law means by the number of members. eh, it was rightly said that we have enough people, we shouldn't stop there. of course, somewhere goes,

a certain gradation, somewhere. uh, our members are aging already, uh, the advanced age of the communist party, on average, the average voice is somewhere between uh 6 to 6 1/2.000 democratic. i won't be behind the numbers chase. here is the competition. now it didn't work. i'll say a number and someone will think who only fewer communists you have more we have different approaches the communists have a very tough approach. e to pay the swedish contributions they really have. i want to praise them, that is, praise them for being one of the oldest parties that really exist and that has an impact on the development of the country, we have 40,000. but i want to say right away that we have been handing out party tickets since 1994. it's real party members, but for re-registration. we are ready, we will file at least ten thousand. and for re-registration, these thousandths, but in the current political situation. we achieve,

of course, and look there, the most important thing is that the law does not include the task of creating organizational structures. in every area. if there are no people, it means what kind of party it is, and moreover, that the organizational structure in the region has been registered. it is necessary to have structures in districts and cities at least 1/3 of the region. that is it. well it a priori correct. why if the party is structured. it means that it is supported by the people and another important point. you understand that this law is a step forward for the development of political parties and the whole country. i will explain why those parties that are able to re-register for all for the people for the government for officials. it is immediately clear that this is a real political force that must be reckoned with. one should rejoice, what is a tough law, if the communists passed it is a force, if we passed it is a force, who did not pass did not pass, so that no one would think that we want country where different. only the point of view will not

be this, there is no need to be afraid of the word opposition. but what's this what's the difference? that's what we need to understand, we will argue in the elections with the communists from white russia and the liberal democratic party has been and will be a constructive position, but what is the question , we will stand together with the falcon with the communists with white russia and defend our country to defend national interests to fight with admins to support our president. his people have chosen. but that we can't officials criticize? as criticized so will we criticize and i very much applaud the creation. uh, the belaya rus party - this is a very important step. you don't understand yet. can someone what does this mean, now the political field will be structured over time. here is the ruling party. this is not a bad word centrist powerful strong, supporting the president. there are communists on the left flank. there is a right -wing center party, the liberal democratic party. we will try to unite on our own by the elections other right-wing

conservative patriotic forces and we will to criticize and defend the country together is wonderful and people will have an alternative in the elections. everyone has the right to vote. for whom? hu likes the communists vote more than that, the president here unites everyone. he won over 80% in the elections. but this does not mean that those who voted for lukashenka in the presidential elections will support belarus in the parliamentary elections. many of them will support the communist, they support lukashenka, and it is more interesting to support the communists in parliament. this will be more interesting the main thing is civilized, because i’ll translate it into a simple one. an example we are arguing here here we will argue the studios with a falcon, and the theories of mars lenin figuratively speak about something else for god's sake , god forbid someone will say a word to our country with poland lithuania together. if you say, let's get up and fill our faces, we carried out, if possible, some kind of social research. what is the level of trust in the party among the people now, because, well, that's how it looks. thank you

5.000 people. i want to tell you that e rating or level of trust every year is growing. previously, he was somewhere around me, if aleksandrovich's popolicy is somewhere within 20% today, somewhere around 27, closer to 30%. here, uh, the rating is zero when it comes to destructive parties. yeah, we didn't deal with political parties. it couldn't be, uh, head of state. eh, in these two years, all his words have come true. he never said, don't artificially make these policies the right way to go the european way. there is no need to go, even the russian path has its own way, so we, for example, will have a russian assembly above everything. this is extreme. it’s good if someone starts playing politics with the leaders of political parties, including the entire belarusian assembly, they will quickly land and put them in their place. this is the highest body of power of the people and it is fine in the country, but at the same time , the law on political parties, the law on civil society, these are the pillars and

the decision to create a party on the basis. white russia - this will be an incentive for the development of parties. this was not there before. now , after the adoption of these decisions, several years will pass and you will see that the political reality it will be completely different, i want to say the words of lukashenka again. so he always said, uh, and part of the people kept his word in the twentieth year. i wanted political reforms, but guys, not on the street, and the most amazing thing, here they are, the president kept his word, despite the fact that the war is on, despite the fact that sanctions, despite the fact that it would seem, what a development of the people of power. what kind of development of democracy should be clamped down now, the president is still going. uh, as the person who keeps his word, we develop both people's power and democracy. that's all we are now discussed, you know, the main platform for discussion. it should be on the street, and on the basis of the parliament, the councils of the republic, where each political force can express its

point of view in terms of the functioning of government bodies in terms of the development of certain bills. i mean, uh, really. here is e. well, let's say that in order to move, of course, of course, and this is a modern society , you understand, as for street fights. well, it's like this below, this all does not happen. and more than that, i would like to add that an important change, even if , uh, a political party is registered, but in the process of its activity will be monitored, besides the fact that we said destructive effectiveness or to undermine national institutions and the constitutional order, then, uh, the deadlines are set. when will e, these powers are all eliminated. that's all, an unregistered political party has no right to lead. any activity on

the territory of the republic of belarus is also very important. due to this change, how do you you see the upcoming elections to the parliament parliament we have elections in one data constituency. this is what people should know. we don't have elections based on party lists, so it's still, uh, the election methodology itself. it remains the same, we will know the person. and this is important. this is also important, of course i do not hide it. we have different opinions. for example, i was and remain a supporter of the proportional majority system. this is part of the deputies. in my opinion , they should be elected according to party lists, the only thing i fully agree with the head of state. he's always on these offers replied that it would now be somewhat artificially premature. but i think we will come to this and the first step in the law has been taken. we removed some restrictions from the constitution. she further changed the electoral

system at the professional stage. well , in the twenty-fourth year, elections in one data district, but something has changed and the first electoral code is very significant. it's an updated one, uh, a democratic second single day. for the first time we are electing deputies of all levels on the same day, the third moment everything is in in accordance with the law on political parties , re-registration will take place and only those parties that have passed re-registration will come to the elections and are a political force under the new legislation. they still have this priority right to nominate candidates for deputies without collecting signatures. that is , whether they have a choice, the most important thing is that in elections it is for people to have a real choice. and i think that's what we're doing now. well, the fourth point is the last important one. this is that the entire belarusian assembly will stand above all of us, as the highest body of the people power representative, which will actually see to it that any political discussion, as the twenty-fourth year crosses. in which year the 25th presidential

election did not pass the constitution and the law, and i also want to say very importantly, and the head of state has always emphasized this. we are going. we are moving forward today, taking into account that the draft law has already been considered and approved; it is important that we do not make the mistake of our neighbors in russia, let's say. how many political parties, especially before elections spoiler batches? uh-huh it's terrible, you see, when people don't know who to vote for, who to choose next, there is only one central party , which is the dominant dominant, but still, uh, parties are formed with spoilers that take away votes from both the dominant and the liberal democratic and communists. this is the first. second, we have to look. it's just negative , to put it mildly, the experience of ukraine look, i don't remember from memory, more than 260 parties, where something was created. it's chaos, it's chaos. uh, so we

have to take it easy. i'm sure, that over time we are calmly considering. we will still be able to work out a mechanism for our immediate and distant neighbors to switch to a mixed electoral system, in general in connection with these changes. is there a surge of political activity expected, maybe some new parties will appear. the very fact. here, for example, uh, it means that the decision to create a party based on belarus is, by the way, not just a decision made. and just because of the surge in political activity, belarusians became more active after the twentieth year. they are not indifferent. we we see various initiatives. and this is just the time for such a real, e constructive constructive policy. and someone else is afraid. why do we need parties? for what? she is generally something friends of my country, where everyone has one opinion does not happen. and if there is no

discussion, there will be no different points of view in the parliament, there will be no political disputes , including no forward movement. if there is no discussion, everything uh, dead should not be like this. therefore, we must extract noah's mistakes. that's right, a colleague said. in russia, they also led political parties at the beginning, as soon as the party lists saw that they had broken away from the people and switched to a proportionally majoritarian electoral system. uh, but without a party, then where is politics beyond politics on the street, if people cannot be realized by political parties, if we recognize that people have the right to have different points of view within the framework of the constitution. for example , we have a different view of the economy. we are not going to say that all of one opinion does not happen. you are in the family, come home . the husband has one opinion and the wife has the second. mother-in-law has a third and all fourth. yes listen to it a compromise comes, the head of the family slammed his fist on the table, he says it will be like this, but he listened to everyone i translate into belarusian.

we have argued parks and leaders and we will argue toughly, the president came according to the constitution with his fist, bitch, whoever does not want to work, everyone ran to work, and the russian assembly is standing over them, if someone is like that, if the wife ran to bring the family to the left, her russian assembly is immediately put by the scruff of the neck and into place, and i transfer it to politics, if the party leader plays too much, win these political ones, we will quickly put him in his place, you see, as in the country, as in the country, as the rules and the law in the communist party, democratic centralism. that is, there are questions, there is a problem being discussed by regions, locally, at all levels. all discussion has gone to the highest genus. and here is how sergeevich said on the table. this is how the whole country decides. god forbid that the officials now in the positions of the president will never give the team the idea that everyone was a million

percent of the party of belarus now they can to start, so that they are not ahead , there must be different points of view, you know everything in the communists, they must communicate with us, communicate, listen, we will express our opinion, then the country will move with these 5,000. very important. we are last year. here are the political parties that support both the head of state and the course that is being pursued, uh, the public association is precisely such weighty mass ones. we created what e patriotic union, and we are today. here we go, everything is coming together, that is, we have some kind of problem, there is still. something we're about to. here is the last time at the base. e white russia gathered and discuss this problem. we are working out, let's say, a plan of action, joint activities that are being carried out and will continue to be carried out. that is, this is also we show people that it is not

just the communist party or the liberal democratic party, for example, on their own. and we say that there are many of us united front. yes, absolutely true, but there are nuances in the law. and the prohibition of financing the party from abroad, how can parties secure themselves such injections, in general where to get money from? uh, what oleg sergeevich at the beginning of the program said the event has a lot planned for each party. uh, just spend it, well, it’s clear that any event costs funding. but where then, where to get the money? well, uh, i say about us we have what was said. we, uh, pay membership dues. so, that is, the party finances itself. your yes, that is, uh, we uh, we can also maintain offices. we can hold real events, what we have enough of these funds for, we continue to work printing house. that is, we have the right to engage in publishing activities. and

yet, we are not doing it yet, but we will be doing it. this is the implementation and various abbreviations. here is what concerns the party of the times of the ussr, for example, that is, here is such a plan. merchant activity , unlike public associations, is forbidden to political parties, which is why, and the fact that funding is correct, how can a party express an opinion or act in the interests of the state, if uncle son allocates millions of dollars? to this tune they will correspond, the national interest with such funding. if you took even a penny from poland or america you work for this country and ask people a question as party leaders. here are some radical ones who have now fled abroad for 10-15 years and are not working anywhere. how is that possible, here is the leader of the communist party working. i always work, there was never a day that the work book was not somewhere and where they were carried out. uh,

functional responsibilities, how can this be the first second funding. we are well aware that the policy of this finance. the main thing is that these finances should be only belarusian in law. there is another important change in political parties: we have lifted the ban on financing political parties from local republican budgets. there is such an opportunity, but i will immediately explain to people, they will ask. have you gathered now, so the parties are not giving money to these 15, and close. now nobody can do anything. now parties will exist. at their own expense, at the expense of members of their parties, that is, someone brought a sofa, someone brought a pen, someone rented an office. someone else did something, but in the future, of course, after the development of the political system, when the re-registration takes place, the elections are the criteria for what to whom how much what to give there in general, in principle, only to the party that the people support and in fact it will be to finance. all the same, the voter, as in the whole world. there is simply some kind of system that is being created in the future, but not now. it will again be

artificial, and the head of state correctly said that it does not live artificially. it won't survive. here you can take money now to please everyone, take care of the park, and how to realistically calculate who is supported more, who has more money elections choice one way elections. and how many percent voted for whom. here are our spain yes , the parliament and local councils, which means how many deputies how many gained percent. here we have one system of circles, you can’t just watch the deputation, because, for example, somewhere 15% 18% of candidates were recruited. this is a serious support figure, so these are just elections. how much party enjoy popularity among the people, this is the only criterion. we have already talked about the ban on funding from abroad. at the same time, for sure, political parties have connections with their counterparts in other countries, with someone you only communicate with her and what benefits can be derived from this. well, i will say this, i am like a belarusian politician and deputy. uh, i don't have

friends abroad. i believe that there are colleagues to cooperate with everyone nearby. eh, where there are national interests of belarus the fact is that the world has changed a lot. uh, here's the political left that used to be left no longer left in europe, but it is not clear who is right - this is wrong. but it’s not clear who , for example, my party is called liberal democratic, but we had nothing to do with western liberalism, so we have our own belarusian liberalism with a hint of the ministry of internal affairs and the kgb, which means it’s wonderful. and here is such a good belarusian liberalism, but i'm not talking about that. i believe that just the same , the development of the political system of parties will contribute to international cooperation. i will give a simple example in all foreign parliaments. there are factions. uh, factions of various parties. and when the deputies come there they are asked. what political force do you adhere to, but everything is changing very quickly. anyone who has it is clear that they are now developing a leftist movement. uh, the communists come to power in many countries. the left is coming along nicely. is

n't the communist party developing these relations? this is good. we try to communicate with the entire spectrum of political forces in europe and right centrist with those who are ready to work together with belarus in our common interests. i want to say that the communist party of belarus, uh, interacts so to speak in an international format, this is a party that is communist labor social. so we, uh, try to interact with everyone, it is clear that these are the parties in the post-soviet space. and in many of our countries they are banned, unfortunately, either they act under a different abbreviation, but nevertheless we meet, exchange experience, share problems. and uh, like in our country, let's say that they have an uh situation, then we, in principle, often own in the parliaments of neighboring countries. they only we see quite unsightly behavior. yes , when representatives of different parties sort

things out in a not entirely civilized way in belarus in general, such a multi-party system may not turn into. here is such a disgrace. here's the job. this is what i said at the beginning progressive. uh, for the development of the political system of the stage, so that such horror and shame is what we see on tv, when the diets are happy to sit and when they reach assault, yes scuffle and all. this is unacceptable, especially to people. the highest representative body of power in the country. therefore, we say that the platform should be for peaceful regulation. everyone has the right to these free microphones and express their point of view. and the representation of deputies that is present in the hall. they will either support this point of view or not, and there it all goes by force. well, well, well, this is

a mirror of what is happening. there, for the same sake, for example, it takes place on the streets and what we see is that the show, but in fact there are no democratic elections in them , all the financial corporations that stand behind these parties see financing. yes, and in order to yes financing uh, lobbying for some oligarchic interests, what is a secret, or what ? this is what we must avoid in any case, we do not need a political show , we need normal development. our own country and i think that we have taken a very important step in this direction by adopting the constitution for all peoples, this constitution protects against this. well, now all that's left is to work. thank you very much for a very interesting conversation. i hope that such changes will really benefit the country and the development of democracy. thank you. thank you.

what is a collection of belarusian cuisine? what are the recipes there? how many of them, about 100, are unique recipes by the author of the book, as you noticed alexander vashchenko, but his book is based on the work of the famous belarusian ethnographer nikolai nikiforovsky. what is the uniqueness of these recipes, as it were, and above all, the fact that they are adapted to modern technology book published in three languages, this is very important, because many dishes, and they are presented today on our table. we're all preparing a fridge. and this is star belarusian cuisine, we

are making a loaf. we eat potato pancakes, and bake potatoes, and these dishes are in english. uh, for the first time presented and at the same time the ingredients that are used in these dishes are absolutely available today. but if the recipes that are already today are not characteristic of our modern diet. are there many such recipes? in this book there are no such recipes a little uh, almost 90% of recipes. they are no problem today. you can cook the only thing we cook today, and in the oven, right? ah, on fire, and then they cooked. it was the same oven. and of course we can comply. here is some kind of technological recipe process, but the oven conveys a special taste of the dish. i would like to add more. what is here at the end of the book, and there is, hmm , a reference book of old names, because

the recipe contains words that we cannot always understand, including items of utensils that are called in old belarusian some language and looking at this guide , you can easily understand everything, uh, also in this book, huh? there is a chapter that is dedicated to omens according to beliefs, and which are connected with food, for example. eh, if a neighbor came to the house to borrow bread, even if the family was poor, one could never refuse a lot of examples generally related to bread, and therefore this book provides an opportunity to get acquainted, not only with the dishes of belarusian cuisine, but with the traditions of learning the customs of our ancestors, and, accordingly, to get acquainted with the history and the culture of our country. when

did you hold a book in your hands again? they leafed through page after page greedily, tasting every word from all manifestations of human creativity. the most amazing worthy of attention. this book in books lives at home, the voices of people of the past are distinctly heard, everything that mankind has done has been preserved, as it were, by magic on the pages of books.