shmat, e chago told at self-correction it appeared. i w- for many i fly peculiar. and with such it patriotism to command your own land, your vulkovian land. well, i'm at home simonovich not to forget about this tikava. well right in that she didn't become the center of the calgas, and she's not at the butt house. the olympians do not converge on the air at home and the gomels elk and bypassed what to grind e, more leaving these places. and yet history will take place. the army is the plates that were on the officers, and the soldiers were buried in common graves. something else

written. well, 1929 apparently, they did this in the twenty-ninth year, we are in a place where the old times, according to our convictions or the approval of the settlement, then the local villagers or residents organized a cemetery here according to our silence, and in the twenties, on top of these already closed fry with cemeteries. so, they made the burial of the soldiers of the first world war, they collected all over the district those who were buried were noted and well, there was a special team. it wasn't in one day. not in one year, then here there are only losins nearby. there were trenches there were battles, and. well, actually, there were a lot of people there. in memory of this, that it was here , people collected money and put up such a cross.

well, they brought some of the plates that they kept, so to speak, that they could find. in the breastplates of soldiers of the first world war for the city path this is between simony and kholmsky. once upon a time, people traveled, and it connected, respectively, pinsk with brest or with kobrin, whatever, but with a very old road. and this is a high section of the road. that is, here the sand is a mountain. here is the place that the local name is the lake and which are very close to the old-country path, literally 10 m, from the edge among the sand of all this. here is such a fairly round and regular shape. yamina with diameters of 70 meters is its origin. well, no one knows, but the bottom line is that when they dug peat here in the sixties, they found, well, for themselves people.

they determined that there was about 1.5 m of peat behind here. i myself then participated in this as a kid. that is, it is not something that someone invented and told something. i saw it all myself and even took it out and took it out with people were taken out and so on. and along with peat or in the place of this peat, stakes of a sufficiently large diameter were dug out, but the sharpening of the colic was interesting, to which the locals said that it was not our people who sharpened it like that, because usually coll was sharpened into four edges. and these stakes were sharpened on 8 faces. i myself observed them or remember it's all such a mysterious place. why is it here or how did it come about? well, you can guess. but the fact that the depth of the peat was about 1.5 m, respectively. somewhere 1,500 years ago, if

proceed from the calculation that a millimeter is also deposited there a year. it was just clean here, but because of one and a half thousand. such sentiments have been going on for fifteen hundred years. they gave birth to fyodor danil yanchuk, a well-known stratum and, accordingly, here arose, well, a group i don’t know, maybe the earth is like this here, maybe something else, because for some reason there is no such thing in other places, and here is a litvinka i found that here are two of a person we say this, who wrote a book. fedor danilovich klimchuk translated a new commandment. to the local mov fyodor danilovich klimchuk is for us, well, somehow my rooms, which we try to go to or continue his work, somehow how can we remember this, well, an absolutely

outstanding person who offered so much strength, well, somehow save . well, the fact that our place or our yaselda pripyat is a shin and west of these rivers. this is the brest region. and it was then that these soviet scientists recognized that this was about the homeland of the slavs. well, that's something to be proud of.

the postscript program for today is a guest of our studio oleg gaidukevich, chairman of the liberal of the democratic party of belarus, deputy of the chamber, representative of the national assembly of belarus and aleksey sokol, first secretary of the central committee of the communist party of belarus, the political system of our country is changing right before our eyes, and the parliament has already approved a new law on political parties. what conceptual things are laid down there, that this is a large-scale change in the political system of the whole country. everything changes. this is a bill that worked. or we have been over it for more than one month. it was very serious deep work with the participation of the expert community of representatives of political parties. my colleague also participated. here we both sat in the composition of the expert council that developed this law. and i really want to note. it should be noted that

the drafters of the bill did indeed come from the party, from the people, from the party, and not from above. that is, what the parties wanted, then, in principle, they laid down in this law that two main aspects are changing. i would like to point out. the first is the requirements for political parties and the ordering of the political field countries. we have to clean up there. today we are on registration. here in the country there are 15 political parties, of which only a few others actually operate either on paper, or, even worse, are destructive political forces that oppose their own constitution against their own constitution against their own people. someone called for sanctions, someone called for mass riots, and someone lived for decades at someone else's expense at the expense of external financing. didn't work anywhere the leaders of these parties received money from there , empty work books and, uh, did everything to destroy the country. that is, we are these political parties. we need

to remove it for june after re-registration. yeah, so they won't get through, because they're breaking the law. secondly, we are making political parties, uh , real forces. uh, the requirements that the political parties of the new legislation. this is for example 5,000 members or belarusians. here's to such activity to join the party. they are already in the party. that is, and this is already happening , firstly, parties cannot be separated from others public organizations and, in general , the modernization of the political system. i want to say that the adoption of a law on political parties is within the framework of a package of documents, but civil society, and all the belarusian people's assembly electoral code. and one more thing that we said right now the studio should have is a decision that already exists - this is the creation of an organizing committee to create a political party on the basis of a public organization. belaya rus is an extremely important decision to create a presidential party, a powerful large central aside, because it well, for the development of not only this party, but also

the rest, because the development of white russia as a party provides opportunities for the development of the communist party of the liberal democratic party and others. who is truly committed to constructive work for the good of the country. and let 's clarify this nuance, and consciously on the basis of white russia , that is, automatically all participants in public affairs become members of the party, or is it a different way for a public organization to work. this is a very wise decision. i why him i support in general with the organization belaya rus , it unites people of different views. i know that many members of the communist party are members of belaya rus, members of the liberal democratic party work and are members of belaya rus and a public organization. belarus remains, and on the basis of white russia a political party is being created. they go side by side, but it is a political force that is fighting for power, the party is different from the social organization than the main task of the party - it is the struggle for power to participate in elections. and do not be afraid of this word, someone is watching tv now and says wrestling. what is chaos no? it's just a

power struggle. there is an unconstitutional struggle for power on the street, not civilized, but different points of view, there should always be an alternative in the elections, and this is all that the public association allows. they basically represent that cultural social. uh, the economic interests of citizens who are members of a public association. uh, people are those who belong to political parties. they directly and uh, the party itself represents exactly the political views of these people, so those innovations that have been made. what is said, uh, said oleg sergeevich, they are really significant, because uh , there must be real party forces that do not just understand the president's power, for example, gaidukevich. you may not like the falcon, but there is a constitutional system. there is independence, there are interests. the people and we

must respect them. yes, there is pro-government. we do not hide the fact that the same white russia , e, are pro-government, and we and the liberal democratic party, in contrast to the e russian federation, where the liberal the democratic and communist parties , as it were, are in opposition, but this constructive position, which i repeat once again, is aimed at building the country of society, increasing prosperity, and let's say so, this is the way forward. and today. we are not afraid of this, what is indicated in the law means by the number of members. eh, it was correctly said that we have enough people, we don’t have to stop there, of course, there is a certain gradation going on somewhere. somewhere. eh, our members are getting old already e old age now chi. and for the mystical party, on average

, the average sound is somewhere between six and 6.5 thousand democratic, i will not chase numbers. here is the competition. now it didn't work. i'll say a number and someone will think who only fewer communists you have more we have different approaches the communists have a very tough approach. e to pay the swedish contributions they really have. i want to praise them, that is, uh, praise them for being one of the oldest parties that really exist and that has an impact on the development of the country, we have uh 40,000, but i want i must say right away that we have been handing out party tickets since 1994. these are real members of the party, but she is re-registered. we are ready, we will submit at least 10.000. e for re-registration here is the five thousandth, but in the current political situation. it achieves, of course, but look there, the most important thing is not numbering in the law, the task of creating an organization is spelled out. structures in each region,

if there are no people, it means what kind of party it is and moreover, that the organizational structure in the region was registered. must have structures in districts and cities at least 1/3 of the region. that is, well, this is a priori correct. why, if a party is structured, it means that it is supported by the people and another important point. you understand that this law is a step forward for the development of political parties and the whole country. i will explain why those parties that are able to re-register for all for the people for the government for officials. it is immediately clear that this is a real political force that must be reckoned with. one must rejoice, what is a tough law if the communists have passed this strength, if we have passed, is strength, who has not passed and has not passed, so that no one thinks that we want a country where there will be no different point of view alone. it is not necessary to be afraid of the word opposition. but what is the difference in what we must understand, we will be in the elections.

to argue with the communists from white russia and the liberal democratic party has been and will be a constructive position, but what is the question , together with the falcon with the communists from white russia, we will stand and defend our country , defend national interests, fight against aces, support our president. his the people have chosen. but why can't we criticize officials? as criticized so will we criticize and i very much applaud the creation. uh, the belaya rus party - this is a very important step. you don't understand yet. can someone what does this mean, now the political field will be structured over time. here is the ruling party. this is not a bad word centrist powerful strong, supporting the president. there are communists on the left flank. there is a right- centrist liberal-democratic party. we will try to unite other rightists on our bases before the elections. conservative patriotic forces, and we will criticize and defend the country together. this is wonderful. and the people in the elections will have

an alternative, everyone has the right to vote for whom. hu likes the communists vote more than that, the president here unites everyone. he won over 80% in the elections. but this does not mean that those who voted for lukashenka in the presidential elections will support white russia in the parliamentary elections. many of them will support the communists. they support lukashenko and the communists will be supported by the parliament. it will be more interesting civilized, because i'll translate it into a simple one. example. we were arguing here, we’ll argue like a falcon in the studio, and figuratively, i say, for god’s sake , god forbid, someone will say a word to our country with poland from lithuania together. if you say, let's get up , i'll fill my face. if possible, some kind of social research was carried out. what is the level of trust in the party among the people now, because, well, everything looks beautiful 5,000 people. a. well, uh, i want to tell you that u rating or level of trust every year grows earlier. that he was somewhere, if from

memory oleg sergeevich is somewhere within 20% today, somewhere around 27, closer to 30%. here, uh, the rating, as far as destructive parties are concerned, is zero. yeah, we weren't involved in political parties couldn't be. here, uh, head of state. e, for these 2 years all his words have come true. he never said don't make it artificial to find policies to go the european way the right way. there is no need to go, even the russian path has its own way, so in our country, for example, the russian assembly will stand in itself above everything. this is extreme. it’s good if someone starts playing politics with the leaders of political parties, including the entire belarusian assembly, they will quickly land and put them in their place. this is the highest body of democracy in the country, but at the same time, the law on political parties, the law on civil society, these pillars and the decision to create a party on the basis of belarus, this will be an incentive for the development of parties. here. that wasn't there before. now

, after the adoption of these decisions, several years will pass and you will see that the political reality will be completely different, i want to say the words lukashenka again. so he always said, uh, and part of the people kept his word in the twentieth year. i wanted political reforms, but guys, not on the street, and the most amazing thing, here they are, the president kept his word, despite the fact that the war is on, despite the fact that sanctions, despite the fact that it would seem, what a development of the people of power. what kind of development of democracy should be clamped down now, the president is still going. uh, as the person who keeps his word, we develop both peoples' power and democracy. that's all we are now main platform for discussion. it should not be on the street, but on the basis of the parliament, the councils of the republic, where every political force is. maybe tell your point of view e in terms of functioning. uh, government authorities in terms of development. those or other bills, that is, uh,

really. here is e. well, let 's say that in order to move, of course, of course, and this is a modern society , you understand, as for street fights. well, it's like this below, this all does not happen. and more than that, i would like to add that an important change even if a political party is registered, but in the process of its activity will be observed, except that we said destructive activity or to undermine national institutions and the constitutional order, then the deadlines have been determined. when will e, these powers are all liquidated. that's all, an unregistered political party does not have the right to conduct any activity on the territory of the republic of belarus, this is also very important. maybe i'll throw

in some firewood first. this is fire. and you then him fires up when you interact with people. you must understand who you are talking to. and to speak with them in a language that is understandable and accessible to them, these movements are similar to the work of a jeweler . jewelers make beauty. and we save lives all in the interests of their state patients. why do patients travel? well, this is the brand brand of belarus - this is the quality of knowledge, understanding and arguments, as well as questions that lie on the surface in the author's project markov nothing personal. don't miss new releases on channel belarus 24. we talk about the most interesting from the world of science, dizziness

, lack of appetite, apathy, pale skin, with such symptoms, fallen wax , a third of the population of the whole world turns to the doctor, ask the most exciting questions and give. answers to them by the body with oxygen, walking in the park will not work if the hemoglobin in the blood is low. the less hemoglobin, the less oxygen the cells and organs receive, and the greater the likelihood of hypoxia of oxygen starvation. watch the popular science project science mania on our tv channel. how do you see the upcoming parliamentary elections ? parliament, we have elections in one given constituency? this is what people should know, we do not have elections based on party lists, so the election methodology itself remains,

and this is important. this is also important, of course i do not hide it. we have different opinions. for example, i was and remain a supporter of the proportional jelly system. this is part of the deputies. in my opinion, they should be elected according to party lists, the only thing i fully agree with the head of state. he always replied to these proposals that it will be somewhat now artificially premature. but i think we will come to this and the first step in the law has been taken. we removed some restrictions from the constitution. she further changes the electoral system to the professional, but the twenty-fourth year , elections in one data constituency, but something has changed and very significantly the first electoral code. he is updated, he is democratic, the second single day of the naked. for the first time we are electing deputies of all levels on the same day, the third moment everything will be held in accordance with the law on political parties re-registration and only those parties that have passed re-registration will come to the elections and are a political force under the new

legislation. they still have this priority right to nominate candidates for deputies without collecting signatures. that is , whether they have a choice, the most important thing is that in elections it is for people to have a real choice. and i think that's what we're doing now. well, the fourth point is the last important one. this is that the entire belarusian assembly will stand above all of us, as the highest representative body of democracy, which indeed will see to it that any political discussion, a 24 year will cross. what year the 25th presidential election did not pass the constitution and the law, and i want to say something very important, and the head of state has always emphasized this. we are going. we are moving forward today, taking into account that the contract has already been reviewed and approved; it is important that we do not make the mistakes of our neighbors . you see, in russia we will allow. how many political parties, especially before the spoiler party elections? uh-huh it's terrible, you know

when people don’t know who to vote for, who to choose next, one central party , which is the dominant dominant, but still, uh, parties are formed with spoilers that take votes from both the dominant and the liberal democratic and communists. this is the first. second, we have to look. it's just negative , to put it mildly, the experience of ukraine look, i don't remember more than 260 games from memory. they have created something there. this is chaos. it's so chaos. uh, so we have to take it easy. i'm sure in time we'll calmly given err. we will still be able to work out a mechanism for our immediate and distant neighbors to switch to a mixed electoral system in connection with these changes. is there a surge of political activity expected, maybe

some new parties will appear. the very fact. here, for example, uh, it means that the decision to create a party based on belarus is, by the way, not just a decision made. and just because of the surge in political activity, belarusians became more active after the twentieth year. they are not indifferent. we we see various initiatives. and now, just the same time is such a real, e constructive creative policy. and someone else is afraid. why do we need parties? for what? it is generally that something is friends of my country, where everyone does not have one opinion. and if there is no discussion, there will be no different points of view in the parliament, there will be no political disputes , including no forward movement. if there is no discussion, everything dead should not be like this. therefore, we must extract errors as well. that's right, a colleague said in russia they are the same political parties also led at the beginning, only the party lists saw that they had broken away from the people and switched to a proportional majority system of elections. uh, but without parties, then

where is politics beyond politics on the street, if people cannot be realized in political parties, if we recognize that people have the right to have different points of view within the framework of the constitution. for example , we have a different view of the economy. we are not going to say that all of one opinion does not happen. you are in the family, come home . the husband has one opinion, the wife has the second. mother-in-law the third and everyone listen to find a compromise comes, the head of the family slammed his fist on the table and says it will be like this, but he listened to everyone i translate into belarusian. we have argued the party leaders and we will argue toughly, the president came according to the constitution with his fist. suknul, who does not want to work, everyone ran to work, and the entire belarusian assembly is standing above them, if someone is like this, if you bring your wife to the family, she ran to the left, her russian assembly immediately by the scruff of the neck and into place, and i transfer to politics , if the leader of the party played too much, win these political we will quickly put it in its place

on e, you see, as in the country, as in the country, as in the rules and law in the communist party , democratic centralism. that is, there are questions, there is a problem being discussed by regions , locally, at all levels. all discussion has gone to the highest genus. and here is how sergeevich said on the table. this is how the whole country decides. here, god forbid that the dead men are now in the places of the president. koeman team. never give rise to the idea that everyone was a million percent of the party. belarus can start ahead would not have done should be different points of view. you know completely the list by the communists, they should communicate with us, communicate, listen, we will express your opinion, then the country will move for you is very important. last year we were political parties that support both the head of state and the course that is being pursued, public

associations are just such weighty mass ones. we created what e patriotic union, and we are today. here we go, we all go together, that is, we have some kind of problem, there is still. something we're about to. here is the last time at the base. e white russia gathered and discuss this problem. we are working out, let's say, a plan of action, joint activities that are being carried out and will continue to be carried out. that is, this is also we show people that it is not just the communist party or the liberal democratic party, for example, on their own. and we say that there are many of us united front. yes, absolutely true, but there are nuances in the law. and the prohibition of financing the party from abroad, how can parties secure themselves such injections, in general where to get money from, what oleg sergeevich at the beginning of the program said the event has a lot planned for each party. uh, just spend it, well, it’s clear that any

event costs funding. but where then, where to get money, but uh, i say, about us we have what was said. we, uh, pay membership dues. so, that is, the party finances itself. your yes, that is, uh, we uh, we can also maintain offices. we can hold a number of events, what we have enough of these funds for, then we work printing house. that is, we have the right to engage in publishing activities. and yet, we are not doing it yet, but we will be doing it. it is an implementation of various abbreviations. here is what concerns the party of the times of the ussr, for example, that is, such a plan is commercial. cheskaya activity , unlike public associations of political parties, is prohibited, which is why, and what is correct in terms of financing, how can a party express an opinion or act in

the interests of the state, if uncle sam allocates millions of dollars? to this tune they will correspond, the national interest with such funding. if you took even a penny from poland or america you work for this country and ask people a question as party leaders. here are some of the radicals who have now fled abroad for 10-15 years and have not been working anywhere. how is that possible, here is the leader of the communist party working. i always work, there was never a day that the work book was not somewhere and where they were carried out. uh, functional responsibilities, how can this be the first second funding. we perfectly understand the politics of this finance. the main thing is that these finances should be only belarusian in law. there is another important change for political parties: we have lifted the ban on financing political parties from local republican budgets. there is such an opportunity, but i will immediately explain to people, they will ask. have you gathered now, so the parties

are not giving money to these 15, and close. now no one will get anything now the parties will exist. at their own expense, at the expense of members of their parties, that is, someone brought a sofa, someone brought a pen, someone rented an office. someone else did something, but in the future, of course, after the development of the political system, when the re-registration takes place, the elections are the criteria for what to whom how much what to give there in general, in principle, only to the party that the people support and in fact it will be to finance. all the same, the voter, as in the whole world. there is simply some kind of system that is being created in the future, but not now. it will again be artificial, and the head of state correctly said that it does not live artificially. it won't survive. here you can take money now to please everyone, do the park well? and how to realistically calculate who is supported more, who has more money elections, elections are one way elections. and how many percent voted for whom? here are our parliament and local councils, so how many deputies?