likhanah news, so i have a lot of people i know in viber. i immediately parted, some will meet. here is islam thank you for sending it there. so interesting, here is the village about the activities of the village. uh, well, i’m trying to glorify my tsekhans, and i want our telekans to know that they live, uh, an active life, that life on the style of khans has not frozen, and i also really want my virgin lands to flourish, to be remembered and for people to stay here and live. i don’t want to say that i’m turning grief here, but i, yes, i’m involved somewhere to some here, so that the phones know. to remember them and come to us parts.

a frank dialogue on topics relevant to the entire planet alexander lukashenko gave an interview to representatives of foreign and belarusian media in the palace of independence reporters gathered observers and analysts from a dozen countries journalists from the usa russia great britain austria france saudi arabia boats azerbaijan and japan questions sounded relevant and acute, including the situation in the region near the belarusian borders and at checkpoints on the border of belarus with the european union,

commenting on the situation in ukraine, the head of state once again called for peace talks. alexander lukashenko in a conversation also announced a meeting with vladimir putin. it has been held since february 17. assess the situation with their own eyes, foreign media journalists visited the border with ukraine prestur at the pinsk border detachment section was organized by our state border committee journalists from the usa great britain and france austria saudi arabia and katra, representatives of the mass media visited the checkpoint and the border outpost got acquainted with the features and conditions of service of the belarusian border guards both in the function of the pass, and on the site from the green border. here, on the spot , journalists were told what was really happening on the border with ukraine and provocations from the ukrainian side. lithuania ceases cooperation with belarus to ensure the uninterrupted flow of transport across the border. according to the lithuanian side, the state border guard service unilaterally ceases

interaction with our customs and border services. agreements. the lithuanian side did not indicate this is an unfriendly and unconstructive step on the part of lithuania, such a decision may negatively affect the situation with the rhythm of crossing the border by individuals and vehicles, in fact, the neighboring side is trying to relieve itself of responsibility in terms of ensuring the smooth operation of checkpoints on the eve of lithuania announced i was closing the railway checkpoint from the belarusian side. this is benyakonia, according to information from the neighboring side, the resumption freight transportation is planned after the installation of a stationary x-ray control system, the export of belarusian food by the end of the year should add at least 5% ; this task is set by the ministry of agriculture and food as a priority for the russian market, but they are ready to cooperate with all those interested, so deliveries to the european union last year. grew up, despite the sanctions on spread also exports. china is actively working on the african direction. africa is enough.

a new market for us. uh, a new opportunity that's for sure. e, despite the number countries, which is located in africa to a number of supply countries. e, a trial is being carried out and at the moment , yes, it’s too early to say that large volumes have been delivered there, but preferences are also being studied , e, some trial batches are imported on business trips and work is being carried out on this market, the most popular export position meat and dairy products. during the working visit of the delegation of the kaliningrad region within the framework of the project russia belarus a strong partnership in grodno signed a new protocols of intent now zelenogradsk and the municipal district and the zelvensky district executive committee, as well as the svetlogorsk city district and the novogrudok district executive committee will cooperate in depth in the field of science and education, information and youth policy. definitely. these will be such soft

first projects in the field of tourism culture education, and we are the epicenter of the tourism sector of our region. uh, we represent our area quite broadly. we have 17 tourist routes, so we are ready to receive our colleagues in gomel belarusian intellectual exhibition their achievements are presented by 23 organizations of the gomel region, the first regional center where the exhibition is held, the exposition was organized on behalf of the head of state on the eve of the day of belarusian science in minsk our scientists presented the latest developments in the field of robotics, it-technology and healthcare, agriculture only in the post-soviet space, but also in the world in 2 months. the exposition will travel around all regional centers in the national academy of sciences do not exclude that exhibition belarus intellectual will become a traditional humanitarian mission in syria

, the belarusian military began a russian plane arrived in the country, which delivered our medical detachment. after unloading the aircraft, a convoy of belarusian and russian equipment with military doctors advanced to the area for performing the tasks of the series. 45 specialists of the special forces detachment are working . military doctors will help fight the consequences of the earthquake. the detachment included surgical therapists and anesthesiologists. socio-political talk show in essence today, almost a year after the landmark referendum, we will talk about a new structure of political power and, above all, political parties and social movements.

kirill kosyakov and alison will work with you all evening. hello well, i remind you that you can join our discussion. here at the bottom of the screen you see your smartphone on it and please join our discussion and let's get started. well, in general , i’ll probably start with congratulations to our big the team is essentially exactly two years old. we are on the air and it somehow coincided that exactly 2 years ago, uh, on february 11, 2021, more precisely, when you all went out our first issues in the country, the entire belarusian national assembly was held, as it turned out later, this was the last, if the belarusian people's assembly, in its former status, we adopted a new constitution , an updated constitution, we fixed the constitutional status of the entire belarusian people's assembly. and in general, next time it will be held according to the new rules

in a new format with new powers and a lot of work preceded, in principle, to dress the entire belarusian people's assembly in the form in which we will see it and with which every citizen of ours will interact. there were a lot of discussions , and there were still a lot of conspiracy theories of disputes both at the expert level and at the level of armchair experts. well, in general, what we have today. ah. mm, this is clearly already a given, grigory alekseevich. here you are , as a person who was also in the constitutional commission, which, in principle, is such with its bright charismatic point of view. what do you think, what we have come to here is how we see the entire belarusian people's assembly. ah. this is the best of all possible, or still somewhere they did not finish the shortcomings. i am convinced that both the constitutional commission and the citizens who came to the referendum managed to optimize the system

of representative power, in fact, thanks to the emergence of the entire belarusian people's assembly of precisely constitutional powers, and very powerful powers at that. uh, we are the most we build we build this powerful imagine. well, uh, after all, the authorities. yes , the constitution of the representatives of power does not indicate the legislative executive judicial, but in any case, the entire belarusian people's assembly, together with the parliament, of course, the president is a representative body with local councils. there are about 1,300 local councils of deputies. we are essentially implementing the principle that is enshrined in article 3 of the constitution on the supremacy of power of the people and the people illuminate their power directly or through representative bodies. here. uh, just a vivid example of the fact that the people now, uh, have expanded their base of representation of the people, and if there are 174 parliamentarians in the parliament, now the entire assembly of the belarusian people is up to 1200, in fact the base

of the people's representation has been significantly expanded and the entire belarusian people's assembly in the form in which it presented now the constitution is strikingly significantly different from the former all belarusian people's assemblies now delegates. eh, they also have full. they will work in labor collectives, and retain their powers for 5 years of labor collectives of educational collectives at the place of residence, citizens will have even more opportunities to get in touch with them to raise some issues that need to be resolved, brought to the attention of the constantly operating daily, primarily working executive authorities and implemented, therefore. of course, i positively assess what was proposed for the referendum and one more thing. i understand that colleagues also want to speak out . this is a very, very important moment if we compare the previous powers of the head of state. i must say that the president introduced this project. uh, he was the author of the amendments to the amendments to the constitution, uh, those proposals, he

acted with his powers with a number of powerful powers and what was decided before. well, so to speak, you can say in the couloir's office, maybe they brought the documents there, signed it, appointed now it will already be decided publicly transparency clearly uh, expanded we can talk about this, i'll just stop for now, because colleagues are sure they also want to say this account igor i have journalistic question. why i will explain, because you and i, as journalists, can reason and even philosophize somewhere and fly beyond the borders of what sometimes officials cannot say. look, a lot of people say that the entire belarusian national assembly is such a unique thing that is nowhere to be found, first of all, politics can be dealt with in different ways and politics can be charged in different forms, publishing your ideas, participating in any discussions of scientific conferences, scientific forums, open conversations, open communication speech in front of an audience. so both the theory of politics and the practice of politics are multidimensional, but together there are many other questions . the question of a bright leader. can you comment

on this thing? yes, look at this numbers, which i see, in fact, they call me. well, easy from there, when 56% are abandoned. and you know what a public association is, but everyone knows white russia very well according to the rsm and when 40% do not know, that's who these people are. i, for example, uh, here is this information and we believe. we can see some more i tend to interpret slides in a positive way, firstly, and when a person is calmly doing household chores, family and children , education, work, when he is satisfied with the level of payment, when he feels safe, he does not have to pay attention to some ups and downs on which - you send stories, you can’t take advantage of his calm life and not being involved in some processes, as it was in the twentieth year, but uh, as

for the fame of popularity, speaking about the social base of political parties, the party construction is underway. and the base that has. here, in particular, presented here on this slide is less of a connection. this is just one of the conditions, one of the prerequisites and the deployment of party building, because in particular there are those associations about which there are sufficiently popular and associations that, thanks to their action programs, lead. they demonstrate to society that there is a force that can represent the interest of people, alexandrovich ah. these are the ones that reached white russia, and again, oleg sergeevich spoke about that a political party is distinguished from a public association, in principle, by the desire to fight for power. so, when white russia made a decision about what to become a party, than we did a small remark in

june of last year, we had a program. you were our guests for the first time, you then told me one phrase that i remembered forever that belaya rus is not a socio-political organization, but a political one, that is, ambitions, in fact, already manifested themselves then, we do not ask now. why, because about what when belaya rus becomes a party, probably, journalists have been asking this question for 10 years, that is, it is clear that they have already come to this conclusion. okay well, here's your opinion. why all of a sudden now there is such a need to transform, after all, we see both in numbers and in sociology, in principle, everyone knows, and white russia seems to be working effectively. except for those who do housework. he now said 20 seconds about those who do housework. it is not bad public temperament desire to participate in great public affairs. have not everyone has been like this it will always be like this and , probably, one should not condemn those who really want to live a private life, as for belarus, my colleagues have already said a lot, they will repeat. i will note another

dimension. the need for a political party, but igor said today that in our country, uh, there is such a situation that uh , the head of state said to go to the left, go to the left, said go to the right, go to the right. it's not that i don't mind here. i understand that, but the further, the more people think. why should we go to the left? why do we have to go to the right, what is the reason for this? i mean, uh, civil society, it's not uh, it's never been a mass, but a degree. here are reflections of reflection on what is happening in our country in the world. it is constantly increasing. and this suggests that a so-called activist political culture is being formed. when people want to participate, they don’t want to be just observers, they want to participate in political life. and therefore, a political party. this is probably the optimal form, and political activism can be made simpler. so the first decision to create a party, belarus is more important than the law on political

parties for the political system. guys, if there was no decision on this, 100 laws would have been adopted, uh, the political system would not have developed, i explain now. why does it mean, uh, we used to avoid politics and got the twentieth year. this is one of the reasons. we have always believed why do we have a really strong state in politics, a strong leader, a strong power structure, and even when we don’t we are doing, politicians are taking our place and now these are mistakes. we won't repeat again. it's like with the youth, when we would not deal with the youth and immediately pick up the western centers no, now the answer to the question. when we are in politics. they are behind us somewhere in the west. cause. here we have three or four political parties, we will participate in the elections. we will fight in each other's elections, but when at least someone says a word to our country, we will all stand together. this is called a developed political system. take your head in russia, i will immediately

take the american one from you. the theme there is elephants donkeys. here, look, oleg alexandrovich is now the convincers, confirm everything and the journalists, first of all, they say that belaya rus is the party in power, the liberal-democratic party from the word liberal. the communists immediately go to the right side - this is left liberalism. do not offend. i have my russian. we are like people who are really looking at this story. now it’s like going to the market in an aquarium, because they don’t understand me much. we are here so we lay it out. yes, igor, we talked like that a week ago. here is the party in power left right explanation no party in power is created. i want to draw attention to this and publicly tell journalists and colleagues about this. belarusian civil society is creating a civil society party in our country, a centrist party, but this does not mean at all that this party is in power. but the center is interested in centrism not only and maybe not so much

the authorities. how many people who want? confidence to predict your life is not forward. i just don't know how to shout it loudly, like mr. gaidukevich, so i continue like this. i would like to say that this party is once again why it is not the party of power, but the party of the belarusian society and state. this is the party of our country, which co-ideology will have the unfortunate ideology of liberalism, conservatism , social democracy, and the ideology of belarusian statehood, as far as political parties are concerned. it seems to me that this is definitely missing in our dialogue. traditionally, we have not learned from our school career that the goal political party struggle for power. well , look at least she passed the bill. there are a number of other goals that are currently operating in the part of political parties, so it is definitely wrong to reduce only as if without power. say i

shot the frame. it somehow fits into the fact that there will be a defense of the country , they understand that if the communists are not given the floor, they will take it anyway. well, you know, no one has. it is a genius that the adoption of such an important law in modern realities will certainly contribute to building further political structure and the party structure of society and the country as a whole, but i would like our viewers to have their opinions today. and here, too, i agree. with oleg aleksandrovich, that we are now going to frantically deal with belarus. uh, multi-party construction. here, as if by someone's excuse. and there are two reasons for this, because the first, not everyone will go through registration for this absolutely. i think that 15 will definitely not be the second reason. let's take a look anyway deep in history. yes, but by the time, well , the modern history of belarus will not

go far. here in the period from 90 to 94. you by the time when the country was already near aleksandrovich lukashenko, then it was the political arena of the country , there were also 21 political parties. it existed, but at that time did people even know, at least heard that it was 90 years old, when the political party, but then the goal of most of these parties, which had very bright such glossy pro-european covers, in fact, candy wrappers had one goal further general privatization, as on they call her homeland and, uh, plundering, in fact , people's property, therefore, on that and so the resident of the country did. the only correctly weighed wise political decision as the leader of nations, he staked on the institution of civil society on the trade union organization on the youth organization, veterans and so on, and over time it,

as a matter of fact, show us one more remark wait, then, the president, when he made the decision of this batch operations. there was another very important reason, and here it is. a here stands the legend of belarusian politics by and large, he will confirm me in the supreme council, which was the ninety-fifth ninety-sixth year. can you imagine all the parties betrayed the country, even the communists then turned away not these communists who are now, but others whom you will call me a communist, it was nonsense. and one moment. here you have named a number. who does not know about public organizations. you don't have to be afraid of it. in ukraine, everyone is politicized, every second knows all the political parties, and the country is in ruins. the smaller the society very highly politicized. this means that the country is more reliable and calm. well, for us. i know that story, for example, from thirty percent of the creative class. yes, if a little more, then the country, in principle, is in a permanent house, which is why i say, well , just understand, i asked a question about something that our political system is being built in by

three more significant parties, which in fact can also be called institutions. after all, you understand that the leader of the party and the president of the party and the people representing. party in the field, if this party will ministers deputies, then, in principle, these people will also have enough weight, how to deal with him, this is competition. this is wonderful. can you imagine three parties or four competitors that this is not integration into the system of separation of powers, but political parties are specific, but a segment of civil society that is an intermediary between the state and the people and it performs significant functions of the function of reflecting national interests or interests large social group bringing it to power. this cannot be taken into account. eh, you can, but for public associations have a looser structure for this. but uh, and in addition, it has other functions that are more humanitarian, perhaps public, then, as

a political party, it is aimed precisely at political processes and at bringing e interests not just in an abstract form about the form of certain political meanings to the authorities, which should these to think again, as a journalist i ask, because a journalist write headlines. are there any parties? someone will come to power. i'm not talking about now president. how will it be possible in this situation, when the president, without a party vns, balances the situation to understand which party is in opposition, and which is in power? how do you, how will you consider yourself the opposition will not read? opposite. sorry for the journalists. the question is such a soul, the leading position of oleg gaidukevich. well it sounds real. well , they themselves have taught our audience a little about the beautiful wording of the pro-government opposition . okay. no questions. well, let's start with the political aspect. yes there is

a political system political system included in the political system. this is a classic of political science, which includes the political party, public associations , religious organizations, the state represented by its subjects. and vns. now, as a state body, it is also included in the political system, and the political structure will only be stable when these political authors are consolidated together. defend and national and move. yes, although, but this does not exclude that they cannot be in opposition to each other in terms of their statutory goals of tasks and programs aimed at the evolutionary development of the dynamic development of the state so that it strengthens and develops, and here they compete with each other. in principle, they solve the same problem, they form public opinion, plus they generate a plast of politicians, which, having come to power, will just carry out about the state police in terms of nationality sergeevich, remember your example. i promise to start the second one with him, i want to tell you that this is our national path path. yes, and this is the national way. he is an example for many post-soviet countries in

the post-soviet space. look at the constitutional and legal reform. e, the people's national kurultai, appears in kazakhstan. this is, in fact, the prototype of our vns. it appears now in russia the state council of the state council of kyrgyzstan and the nation, and the national kurultai, moreover, both local and republican kurultai, is everything that is watching us. i joined our discussion, we are talking about new realities and the belarusian political system. we are discussing the belarusian national assembly, we don’t fully understand, but our experts are those who really direct questions to whom are extremely direct. we talked about the fact that belarus not so long ago decided to become a political party, but at the same time, the status of a public association of belarus will also be retained by aleksey oleg aleksandrovich, how will this work? i would like to put the accents very precisely, belarus did not

decide to become the belaya rus party and initiated the creation of a political party. it's not the same public union. belarus remains in our political social space, works , solves all the tasks that are assigned to it, but our activists are our citizens, uh, who are members of the republican public administration. belarus took the initiative to create a political party. it is open to all for any citizen. the name is already russia, we assume that the name will be valid, belarus political party, belarus but uh, why not because a public association, belarus but, because that belarus is a political brand of our country. this is something that is not just recognizable today. and what is will not get confused. i think we will work. so everything is clear. so the first uh, it’s very good that belarus remains a public organization, because i don’t do it from a secret, many members of my party know the communists are members of a public organization, there

is nothing wrong with that, but the second point. so we talked about being an opposition party, not an opposition one. you know we don't use these terms. thanks to us, and thanks to the politics that was in belarus and the radicals and slandered our word, for example, the opposition is associated with something very bad. but yes. you are right, absolutely people, when they hear the position, and many of them listen to what kind of opposition they immediately associate with something bad, in fact, this is an alternative opinion. and now i'll link a simple example. here i am the leader of the party. i support our corner state in many issues and will stand by its side to the end. and i don't like some minister. i'll be about it say that it is not working properly and will criticize the officials. and that i have no right to do so. that's what politics is. and that's what a party is and we'll argue on these issues. and that's okay. but when they spoke in germany, he would say, if this minister was your fellow party member, you would insist on changing him, but can you change? if, for example, well, it's still not a park, there would be a party decision. if i am for

a lot of what lukashenka says but here is the increase in prices, there is a moratorium on price increases dictatorial in a good way, that's wrong. not liberal. well, it’s already going to be like that, it’s just that our party supports it, which means that it won’t support something. this is fine. this is fine. this is politics. and most importantly, parks allow people to see different points of view. this is democracy. we have always talked about our belarusian democracy. they are not being public organizations of the party participating in the selection. anyway, one of the goals in addition to protecting the constitutional order. we have now written in the law a lot of things that the parties must do. this is the unity of people . i will also tell you that the parties will save many people from radicalism, because let's take russia, which has been dealing with this issue for many years. not everything should be taken from them, but here they have five factions in the state duma. and they argue, many people who went out there with navalny's white ribbons went to normal parks, because they saw that it was necessary to engage in civilized politics,

and we must give people an alternative. that's what we talked about here behind the scenes, but about that including political parties will be represented in all the belarusian people's assembly public associations. here is a translated example. and that one person, maybe in a political party, might be married to a union. this is the largest shtar organization in general, but at least two or three, then four options for how to get into the national assembly yes, well, let's say, this person who really wants to decide fate. but doesn’t it work? so in this way we reduce the chances for other people, it doesn’t work, alena, but there are, as it were, two examples, yes, again, the nineties, almost three dozen parties, and a bright charismatic leader appears who says dear country. let's not go to the party with some program. follow me alexander grigorievich. lukashenka one second third and

people follow him, an example is less pleasant, let's say 2020, after all, tikhanovsky did not have parties, baba rick did not have a party , all the people who tried. well, one way or another , there was no party to fight for power. and we slavs always strive to have some ideas personified in some a specific person. that's who it is am, which makes me skeptical about party building. god grant that this situation will change in the near future. here are our viewers, they will call today. three other leaders, uh, ldpb except for gaidukevich, it is unlikely that white russia will get three leaders from the communists as the party will get . yes, everyone will know the leader. well, no, well, in white russia there is a situation, but we all, according to our psychotype, want to see a specific person. who is this anyway? well, what are we talking about? this can be this party

the construction was started by the president so that at this important moment for us the ground was created, so that new leaders were formed by specific people, what if our society is used to the fact that there is one person, and in principle, there is nothing to change, our society is used to, you know there is, uh, a mechanism that was once tested in a neighboring country, when the current leaders, who are absolutely trusted by the majority, say in the country that dear citizens in the next elections. i recommend that you cast your vote for this man. i told him trust. and i believe that he will lead the country, just as i led the right chickens. vote, please, you are used to not used to. the fact is that the construction of power, the system of checks and balances that is now built, it still assumes the president as a leader, as the head of state and the entire belarusian people's assembly, which acts has even more powerful powers than the president, no matter how strange it may sound, that is, of course. ah, a new habit. as someone said habits

will be formed and this, of course, too positively, because it develops, probably, the authorities. here, uh, in relation to white russia, this is not scorpion, not precocious. we have some solution, but white russia e has long heard we know the contribution to stabilization. our society is the consolidation of social development, so the fact that they are striving for their creation of a political party is wonderful, but there is one main feature that distinguishes a public association from a political party. this is really a desire or, uh, such a statutory provision. eh, fight for power in legitimate ways and trouble. here are those the parties were talking here, whether we know the leaders or not, which 15 parties were created, maybe now there are fewer invest e, will carry out this registration re-registration. they did not participate in the elections. and in this regard , people did not know, that is, in fact. here. uh, this phenomenon of not participating in elections led to their scenery. white russia all the time, so to speak , in plain sight, but the opposition. i think you noticed correctly. and that only representatives

of a political party can act, a different opinion. look what opinion, they are deputies requests for appeals for submission of proposals a set of measures that they use in order to influence the executive branch of the minister, and so on and one more aspect, we are supposed to have about 400 representatives of civil society in the composition of the entire belarusian people's assembly . this is a wonderful third - this is a representative of civil society. it will also be the party's public association of the trade union. by the way , i was surprised that they know about the trade unions, uh, 22 percent or something? it's amazing fantasy i advocate for work inferior most often offer him would like to say the protection of trade unions just people are so used to what they are, that they help. so to say that even the public association of the trade union. this is a trade union, so stay in belarusian, therefore, this moment, but e recalls the nineties and young people should know those students who study, so

that thanks to representatives of civil society. yes. these were veterans. yes, a society with disabled people, others were public associations, by the way, the communist party refused that there was their representation, purely under some kind of party list in the supreme council thanks to these fifty deputies, who were not elected by districts, but they were from public associations. we got free education. yes, it is, so to speak, somewhere 50 to 50. well, according to the budget , there were radical proposals for everyone to pay for their studies, in universities and so on. and this is an achievement, so it seems to me, that 's what it says, but the influence of the party, and the significance of the party, when the parties will e work for the general interests. er, that's definitely a good thing. and if suddenly the party deviated from the course, not even the head of state, but from the course that the belarusian people's assembly determined itself, but the strategy from the socio-economic program that was approved. then maybe the party will look at the right things. well, look what america is there, i just finished the topic. well, all right,

actually. we are the republican democrats because of the pro-american course. they don't turn away. they can arrange foreign policy a little differently there social policy. well, in fact, the same thing is fierce, a good example, because for 20 years there were parties that opposed the constitution of state symbols, they wanted to completely change the state system, which , by the way, was not in any country in the world, not in one and the fact that we have now adopted a law is an orderly one, these are the parties that will remain , they can be whatever opposition they want, but they do not have the right to speak, but about belarusian, and one more point about responsibility. i think, that every political party that will undergo re-registration, in addition to its political activities. this is a common dispute that should be specifically responsible. i can say how , uh, we can come to the practice when the parties that have entered the parliament will receive specific referrals, as in other countries some ministry of some area of ​​work and people will see how they cope she or not,

for example. we have no secret in our history that karpenko, who is related to the communist party, he once headed the ministry of education. and this is a good example when the party bore specific responsibility for a specific area of ​​work . i will not have ministers in belarus and they will bear responsibility and justice, but the communists are ready to bear responsibility and our party is ready to bear responsibility for a specific service to the united states , it is belarus today on in fact , a true country of opportunity for those people who have their own citizenship, who are politically savvy, who want to participate. including the mechanisms governing the country is responsible for certain decisions and are ready for this. here there is already the right to choose or a public organization. do you have more high-reaching plans and political ambitions. it doesn't matter if you join the party of haidukevich sokol,

belarus the real country of opportunities is not sitting on the couch or through the mechanisms of word of mouth says that something is wrong with us . here, i would do it differently. but maybe this is it, in general, people will always find it. they will always be today they won't have left not a single argument not to take this person in a referendum for an updated constitution yes, it was about the redistribution of powers. it was about the fact that the belarusian society has matured, that we have seen that the belarusian society is ready to bear the responsibility to make the most important decisions , ready to be active and not only to nod at the president. yes. e. is it possible to make a decision? can't you just be a little more careful? i probably bring this example from program to program. it is the brightest it is all the same prices. well why no one no one, except the head of state, then raised this issue on prices, did not decide or not

decide, well, raise something, simple prices are rising. this is bad for global things about some super ideas, but about national security, and about protecting the interests of the motherland, this is all fine legal aspect yes, we are still going through it. we haven't finished it yet. yes, and we are doing this systematically. we do not have one, only the law of the vns. like some kind of fragmentary law, yes , which reformats the political system of the bunch, there is a law on the foundations of civil society bundle goes electoral code changes in the electoral code, and the political parties of public money. they are all interconnected. they correlate with each other and systematically reformat our political system, but again , legally, but not in fact , it will take a much longer way, because psychologically, we still live according to the old constitution, according to the authoritarian, as the president of the constitution said, where one person , essentially shapes this public policy, but all other

still see some. the problems are correct, and including, as it were, probably, in terms of decision-making, firstly, because there is no line of leverage today and no authority. yes, they will appear later. and secondly, the practice has not yet been formed. yes? yeah, let's say courage once again there is a reason, the third reason is not only courage. let's tell one more truth, just after all, after unprecedented sanctions hit our country. i will speak for myself. for example, i avoid the park now and say less now criticize uniform should be. now the time will come to criticize, when the situation will really be easier. now this is also the reason we sometimes see something, but we avoid harsh criticism. we are solving this with parliamentary inquiries. this does not mean that we do not raise the problem , they do not shout, they simply do not promote this problem. why because they are beautifully pr. now, when the country is actually declared war, by the way, in russia there is a similar situation. now i often go to

the state duma. they used to be among themselves. the factions fought really hard. i am now all the parties arrived, as one stand and defend russia i think this is correct. and now, for example, we will argue little with romanov, because the country is under pressure. but when we hold out, then we will probably argue, in my opinion, in general, common challenges - this is understandable. i'm still talking to you about how it all begins. here, in fact, look at you now, the question has come, just about the economy, but about the fact that, uh, you criticized capitalism very harshly in your speech somewhere. what's the look. what will be the economic program of the party, belarus an electromancer in his lecture under criticism of capitalism, does this mean that the party of belarus will strive to compare socialism, in general for me, as if socialism is now such a very blurry story, because sweden is also socialists. but speaking of capitalism, i really believe that today it is not viable. the economic system is the degree of complexity of the economy of industry,

technology, such that no invisible hand of the market can regulate it. if we talk about socialism, i see in it, really an advantage, uh, and they consist in the fact that socialism is, if we talk about it , really interpret it, how uh, not coarse. eh, how is it? unfortunately , this is being done based on sources on a deep understanding of what socialism is, this is that economic political cultural system , the center of which is a multidimensional person, the development of personality. now, if society is built, so it has its goal not to maximize profits, not there, growth in consumption, but the quality of a person, the quality of his personality such a system can truly be called socialist. i think that it is the future of something you in fact. you can enter the coalition, yes, and you will have holes in the position, because uh, i agree a lot, the white communist, that's all, but it's not bad. this is a normal discussion, that is, we

should discuss social projects. so i suggested, uh, to get acquainted with some of our data. why is the demand for the projects offered by our public association so high, because it is the most social oriented projects aimed at those tasks that each of us see as relevant for ourselves for society for the state degree of support degree of participation degree of trust in such public associations. and how belarus as a belarusian republican youth union is determined not only by the social orientation , indeed, of the general population and these programs, but also by the position of leaders and popularization of activities, and this is basically in the best sense of the word about state associations that can serve here as a prototype, and the future of party building and in general speaking of party building. we must understand that this is a very serious challenge from a theoretical point of view, a challenge to all of us and the scientific community and academic researchers and

journalists, including those who are faced with the issue. how to answer numerous questions is a challenge to practitioners. see nikolai ivanovich uh. so, when you talk about the fact that people have a question about some kind of social security, this is absolutely agree. but what about the party system. i ask myself, again, from the point of view of a journalist, a person who has to talk about this or that candidate. believe me, almost all candidates tried to party history, except for, well, bright leaders like aleksey sergeevich to hide, because they did not consider party affiliation bonuses in the election campaign. and, because we have not developed for 20 years, the socio-political development has been developing . i will explain why we should develop this about the presidential election. everyone has already forgotten. i let me remind you again. we will be in the twenty -fifth year, all the homeless people from the street will run, who wants to then some western agent again will invest millions of dollars

and the people will be intoxicated. so, for this , too, political parties must be why presidential elections in all countries of the world is a controlled process. this does not mean that there are no people in power, but democracy, but no one lets a person from the street into the elections a person who does not have management experience. nowhere is this. look at america someone out there a person who is very important is running for elections aspect yes, in the updated constitution , the right of political parties to nominate delegates to representatives of government bodies, the sixty-ninth article, has appeared. yes, there was no such right of a political party, and therefore it was still. well, albeit indirectly, if not directly, but in general, an argument not to advertise your political affiliation is now, by and large, a political party. yes, the right to nominate from among its members candidates for representative office. it was very good. and you know what it was. the law, which here is someone cleared whining on the internet, listen, they stole the law. now there will be no party. you don't understand, i'm the leader of the party, that this law is a gift for

the party, you know that who has been re-registered. this is a real political force, which will be reckoned with both officials and people will know. this is a gift, but someone says it's bad. but, please pay attention to the previous slad, if it was with regard to areas of activity, we again, we often talk about politics, but apart from politics. that's when our respondents answered the question about what areas of activity of the belarusian republican youth union are considered priorities for them. there, in the list of these directions, all those directions were indicated, uh, in relation to which our political parties. eh, and those who go for re-registration can and should realize themselves. this is a social request a request which, in fact, was voiced by our compatriots. here is another one the widest field for all those who want to become active players in the field of political struggle, not only the struggle for power, but the struggle for realism. lization of the national interests of our country well, look really. here i am again surprised, after all, so many large people who do not know about

the public association at all. here is for me. i understand, of course, that it is possible, this is the politicization of society. it is not so needed, we look at ukraine yes, when a party is created immediately after the series or a person who comes to power. in some area. he immediately organizes a party and leads people by subscription. here is the list history. she doesn't threaten us. we are now talking about the fact that we can parties can nominate candidates there to ensure that the representative bodies of power. we say that the parties, uh, win the hearts of the mind and move in some right directions, but the people are again worried because what if we win the parties and bring in those people who are completely unprepared for this, it is said . let them look at the leaders and in fact vote parties. look, this is the physical system in ukraine, for example, zelensky led the business. i'm not against show business, but they don't know how to manage.

and this can happen here, take a party, bring half a point, maybe, but we didn’t make it for them, the citizens of the country, of course, we must learn our own responsibility for the decision made, to know that we are responsible for the decision made, we must unconditionally understand the programs. it is a certain work in order to cast a vote for someone. it is natural, struggle at some stages. uh, mistakes are made, but these mistakes should not be strategic and what is generally built. this is also not bad, in principle, to some extent that i don’t know the party there, in detail. yes, i know the head of state. yes , so to speak, his course. yes, it is also a big one, so to speak, the property of the republic that we are moving in line with the decisions that are made at the level of parliament at the level of the head of state. now this is such a soft transformation, but with this arbitrator. from the side of the vns from the side so to speak, here yes, it's basically an insurance policy. now generally taken. the course of this from the constitution

follows the strengthening of the powers of the government government . now much more will be responsible for the economic situation for the same prices and so on for the republican budget. they will carry, uh, the draft republican budget, essentially on their own. yes, not the president, he wears, and the government now has a very important norm. and this is also here. uh, those are the origins of the conflict, which were when the parliament passed the law without financial support. where is the head the state had to go. he had to object to this law. so here is the government. now, e will also fulfill this role of control over, e, the project that is brought in if costs are reduced. uh, uh, revenues go down, expenses go up , and so on. that is. generally. this is also very important experts one word. a remarkable norm has appeared, in addition to the fact that the government will also be behind

the economy programs, a number of other leaders will also speak publicly, so to speak, we have a norm. remarkable in the twenty -first, in my opinion, article of the constitution that everyone bears responsibility, social responsibility for the well-being of our society and should make a strong contribution. it's not just that we will sit on the stove and someone will work. also , some piece of our work should also be given to society. this is a potentially strong norm and direction for everyone, including parties, in my opinion. here completes program, i just wanted to say about responsibility. well, they did a really great job, they took responsibility a year ago, they made a choice and said yes to the updated constitution. and now, in these important, difficult, difficult 2 years. you should probably take it. the responsibility is to figure it out, learn and understand what

we really want and what country we want to live in, and i, probably, will say a radical thing. look at the last 2 years. we have carried out such a revision of the political field of the party public association deputies. a now we have to conduct another revision of the voters, so those who are abroad will not be able to vote now. economic

provocations and symmetrical responses for three hours, the president of belarus answered questions from foreign and belarusian journalists, when