[000:00:00;00] economic provocations and symmetrical responses for three hours, the president of belarus answered the questions of foreign and belarusian

journalists, when there is a request for the consolidation of society, the belaya rus association initiated the formation of a new party and the main region of russia where there is so much belarusian new film. from the sakhalin cycle, there is nowhere closer today, immediately after us , my colleagues will complete the picture of the day. spontaneous and very frank interview of our president to foreign and belarusian media , which journalists so insisted on about ukraine a chance for the fugitives to return to their homeland and tomorrow's meeting with putin the first issue of the panorama in a couple of minutes a big report, another unfriendly step of the official vilnius after the announcement of the closure of the railway pass. lithuania unilaterally ceased interaction with our customs and border services. the case is next. what punishment awaits the accused and which of them has already

pleaded guilty in full ? all over the world. we will tell you how the work in the rescue town works in our material. innovations from medicine is quite an intellectual exhibition of belarus began its journey through the regions, the first stop is gomel. details in the panorama will summarize the results of the profile department, as well as discuss the latest news from the world of football and hockey. about war and peace, geopolitics of the regional situation, economic provocations and symmetrical answers, for 3 hours the president of belarus answered questions from foreign and belarusian journalists. this the event on the president's schedule was completely unplanned and sudden at first. a little background that led to this meeting for

more than a dozen reporters. strange. this is the united states britain , the state of europe, africa and asia, organized a crime, media representatives visited the border with ukraine. of course, we were told about the current situation in this area, including provocative actions on the ukrainian side. many did not limit themselves to this point only, they visited other cities at the industrial enterprises of our country and that's it. at this time, someone was asking for a meeting with the president of belarus, someone comments, and someone about a full-fledged interview alexander lukashenko today admits that it was not in the spirit of belarusian hospitality to refuse. all participants. prestur was invited to the palace of independence, and in that case, belarusian and russian journalists, here is such a spontaneous meeting, without any preparation of previously known questions, the journalists asked about what many people wanted to have been to belarus many times and even personally communicated with alexander lukashenko, but considering the agenda and all the events taking place around our country. the central theme was, of course, ukraine. in what case is belarus

ready to use the army? why has the fighting not stopped so far? and who is really ready to talk about peace in ukraine now? we will certainly show this , of course, journalists were also interested in the agenda of the meeting with vladimir putin, which will take place tomorrow, the situation on the border, the chance for the fugitives to return home in belarus, the results of alexander lukashenko’s visits to africa and to middle east ilona krasunskaya will tell you more about everything. today, it clearly illustrates what an unpredictable presidential schedule is in half of belarusian journalists, in general, he was preparing for another event, and as a result he met colleagues from all over the world in the palace while they were here in the presture. every day they showed their reporter persistence, they say, we want an interview with lukashenka, but when our president in the comments, at least someone was refused, some had to go, right with personal belongings, because the plane or train was scheduled. not me, not you, did not prepare for it, but maybe

it would be better to talk about it, after looking at the composition of our meeting today. i see here old acquaintances of mine who came to me, and we very thoroughly, and some time ago, uh, talked with them in different ways on different topics. i think that in dynamics look at the problems that they are and which they are so persistent. uh, tried to give me some problems and threads to blame. i think this is another one. well, such an interesting feature of our meeting today is a spontaneous meeting, but it does not replace and does not change the announced big conversation with the president. it will definitely take place. but a little later, as he said, the head of state. now another priority event is preparing for a message to the people and parliament, where fundamental things will be announced. we are preparing an absolutely frank message to be a response

to all questions. well, a little forward. we will try, as i always say, to look within the framework of this message. therefore , a certain overlay is obtained, and we decided to postpone the big conversation for a while. time is running fast. uh, many problems of the topic, speaking in journalistic language, are developing in their own way and we will find time to get together here and, e, have a serious talk as part of a big conversation, and now the guests have a word for journalistic issues, but there will be a spoiler. many questions. you have already heard not two , not five, and not even 10 times, and in the hall are well-known people steven rosenberg from the bbc for example , alexander lukashenko was interviewed a year ago , he opens this conversation. was it possible to assume that he would ask something else a year ago. uh, the russian army invaded ukraine, including from the territory of belarus. that is, you allowed to use

your territories now as a stand for the invasion of ukraine . are you ready to do it again if the president of russia first asks briefly. eh, yes, ready to listen to me further. do not cut out this phrase just so that you understand my reaction, but are ready. why ready? and i have already brought this point of view to high-ranking officials m, who wear epaulettes on their shoulders. in the western world, i will not specify. i brought just such a point of view. i am ready and not just to provide, but i am ready to fight together with the russians from the territory of belarus only in one case so far, if at least one soldier with a gun comes to our territory from there to kill my people in a civilized language, i say, not folk, if from the territory of ukraine you talk about ukraine

, yes, this applies not only to ukraine. this also applies to our other neighbors, who behave even more inadequately, if they commit aggression against belarus, the answer will be the most severe. the cruelest and the war the wording will acquire a completely different character, plus or minus the same, but the underlying reason is to try to catch lukashenka on the question of this, of course, it’s very funny to watch you say invasion. and i believe that no invasion i'm sorry i was almost the protagonist 14-15. there , in the years when the clashes between russia and ukraine began, i was absolutely in the subject , no one else was in this topic, because both the position of putin’s russia and the position of ukraine poroshenko were on my table. i've seen it all and i've seen it many times talked about, uh, how it could all end, what putin asked me about and i

brought to poroshenko and what poroshenko answered i brought to putin rushed between the two to prevent this from happening. i always ask myself a rhetorical question when assessing a situation. why did the authorities of ukraine begin to strangle russians and russians in ukraine and in the donbas ? why did they drink, get drunk on them, and so on. after all , the problem is, and these events in the donbas did not begin with putin or with russia, they began as an internal indignation in ukraine itself and the impetus for this was given by the maidan and the flight, the departure of yanukovych at that moment to the donbass , he went there in order to restore order in ukraine from the donbass. this is where it all began. and here is putin. and here russia is also

such a fact, irrefutable irrefutable, so i'm not talking about the fact that you insulted everyone and everything you burned people in odessa whom you burned. no nationalist-minded people, well , or how to say the nazis now. i don’t want to use these theses and i don’t want definitions, but they burned people who had a different point view in a democratic state by democratic supervision and mostly russian-speaking people. remember in odessa the world is silent. therefore, this is not an invasion by the ukrainian authorities, they themselves provoked this operation, it was necessary then to agree with russia that there would be no this war, but everything was aimed, starting and including with the minsk agreements, i repeat, so

that it was aimed at unleashing war in order to prepare ukraine for this war, yes, do not prepare, they say it wrong, ukraine was just an excuse. to start here this war, the reasons for this were wanted, the united states of america and someone in western europe now, of course, they have sobered up. well , probably, but for great britain, first of all, they pushed ukraine into this war. well, we got this war. and here the invasion is no invasion. i think it wasn't. you consider this an invasion. i think this is the protection of the interests of russia and those people, if the people who lived there , the russian people, there is a lot of talk about the possible achievement of peace in ukraine, but the fact remains that there is no result, in the first it’s not that during the days of the special operation, lukashenka called zelensky to talk to attempt to resolve the conflict, minsk

provided its platform for negotiations, but the so-called negotiators. at first they agreed, then for days they rode on the belorus messengers, then they completely disappeared from the radar. and ukraine c. the result was banned at the legislative level. whatever negotiations want peace in ukraine let's start talking about peace tomorrow and the guns will stop firing. let's start tomorrow. i know what i'm saying, but you don't want that. you are this you don’t want to, but you will jump to the point that the military will come to kiev and turn away the heads of politicians, together with zelensky, the ukrainian military will come to kiev and put everyone in their place, because they are a meat grinder there, and you run around europe and ask for some kind of weapon to applause fighter jets and more. today you are the culprits of the escalation, you can blame russia. okay, we will proceed from yours, but today people are dying, about whom you said, let's stop this.

let's do it all now. uh, there's no for that, you don't want that. and i won't even say. are you in europe is ready for it europe wants it. she knows that maybe the americans don't want this and tilted europe put her in a pose. and i do whatever they want with it. this is the situation, and you ask some questions there - aggression, will there be aggression from the outside? belarus well, i have already answered this a thousand times 12 - this is an ancient question. i look at grisha azaryonka. he falls asleep when you asked this question, because he already understood for a long time. it is known that we are peaceful people. we know what war is. we don't want war and we are by no means going to send our troops to the territory of ukraine, unless you from there, do not commit aggression against belarus at the beginning of next week, the biden flies to poland to work out the agenda from

warsaw to minsk 50 minutes of flying. as they say, if you are a parent, you can continue talking about the world, welcome to belarus alexander lukashenko personally invites and even putin will fly up to meet in minsk. there are 2 aggressors and peace-loving presidents in the ranks. why not for the sake of ending the war? now, if he wants to end the war? and i’ll send a plane here nearby, if anything, it hurts, it’s accepted. we have a sea of ​​​​international airports, its number one landing here was once clinton flew on a similar plane. and here in your presence the three of us. i guarantee you that vladimir vladimirovich putin will come here, the three of us will sit down and solve the whole problem, we will solve all problems here, our president is a frank person, even. if someone does not like it, calls a spade a spade, perhaps something could not be made public, but he will not be this public

checking, panic would be unavoidable, as it is perceived by insight intelligence data. i read them , you want to draw a war into belarus. this offer the minister of defense already. foolish neighboring states to drag belarus into the war , you dream about it, so that we crossed the border of ukraine poland lithuania why do we have a border with ukraine 1.200 km. in poland or yours another 1.300. how much is half a thousand? if we are drawn into the war, the front thus increases for belarus and russia by 2,500 km. so we are our union russia the group will not be able to fight all these quotes from documents will not be able to fight there from the black sea to the baltic the correct

military calculation until we can fight, because we are not preparing for the war to mobilize him in belarus and russia did not announce the second third mobilization of the correct calculation, but empty stupid we will not give you this chance. but if only you dare to enter our earth, the answer will be terrible . the westerners know what and with what terrible weapon the answer will be. and then you won't argue. and what about the army in belarus 25-30 we have an army of 75,000 thousand in peacetime, but if you dare to fight with us, we deploy an army of up to 250,000, this is half a million in the first stage, in the second third stage. so we are now training, so do not mislead people, no one

needs war, and not yet today. here is this aggression of expanding its this aggression. let's negotiate peace. the east side is ready for it, if you are ready for it i say if because i know that you are not just not ready. for you it would be a terrible tragedy of a catastrophe if peace talks, you need a war, there are already teenagers being caught on the street, they are being caught on the street in ukraine and sent to the front. that is , someone has already escaped there, someone has died, there is no one to fight there, but you don’t stop. you are slowly starting your military to throw more than twenty thousand mercenaries there. they are fighting there, these are people from outside. how much is lukashenko zero? and you reproach me that i am

going to or have started some kind of war there from my people i am sending there. no, i don’t send people there and i’m not going to do it if if suddenly there was such a situation that one of the colleagues had already asked the question that you also wanted to ask, not a single belarusian journalist would repeat it, firstly, this is not professional and you need to respect other people's time, especially when for a long time they asked for a meeting with the president himself, but again, in the tenth round, the austrian colleagues put the mobilization of the so-called part of belarus in their own wording like this. yesterday i was on the border with you in the press area, and on the border with ukraine, and we showed us there, uh, fortifications with the ukrainian sides. we then talked to the local population of ukrainians there, we didn’t manage to talk , i wanted to ask, but hmm in the form of the local

population, i got the impression that literally everyone was anxious. and what can you say, uh, in your countrymen to these people, and who are afraid that their sons will be sent to the territory of ukraine to participate in hostilities. yes, there is anxiety, especially this anxiety appeared. after the rocket fell on that territory, wherever they were, but if the rocket flew from there. so tomorrow maybe soldiers come and the president. that is, i constantly talk about this, if someone comes from there, we will be forced to defend ourselves. the basis of anxiety is in this, and not in the fact that i will gather their children from barakhta bay and go to ukraine there in the west, i called people with a fifth see. such a scenario. they want us to go there, and not only there, preferably later, to lithuania

and the authorities it was. what they want. well, we 'll only go one way until i see another. therefore, these people can be calm, but still they will be in anxiety. at you have children. not yet, now, when you have your own children, then you will understand me and those people will understand, no matter how i convince you. in this, if there is even the slightest probability and danger, you will still be worried, therefore our people are in this anxiety. well, they agree with me and believe that i will do as i tell you. well, i didn’t finish, after all, my most important task is even more important than going to ukraine, but only the brainless in the west do not understand this. i must ensure the security of the country, first of all in the west and in the early days of the war operations. i said it. you see how

it behaves more. how lithuania is behaving so far from an economic point of view. they constantly provoke transferring responsibility to the belarusians to me. so they closed the checkpoints. e. what is this? this is an economic provocation. this means that there is no trade, which means that there is no economy. and gradually gradually. they arrange these provocations, well, axes before the time. right now we are thinking about how we have made a decision, how to respond to this, we will respond. soft. at first they will not understand by effort. we also enough leverage for that. it still leads to bad things. we don't want this. why , even if the reporters do not share the point of view of alexander lukashenko, they still go to belarus, cut off the phones, insist on an interview, the answer is obvious, because these are 100% ratings millions of views. yes, and you need to work out the task of the editors, bloodthirsty belarus from here. all these questions with unpretentious background

have not yet been a single interview. there were no mobilization of political prisoners. were prisoners. ah. recently, not sentences, but journalists are more accurate. and when to stop it? but he is the law , we don’t have any political prisoners, because we don’t have such a political article in the criminal code. well, you came up with it for yourself and talk in the west, political prisoners, political prisoners, and so on and so forth people with different political views , thousands of thousands of hundreds of thousands of people, they live in our society from a different point of view, but they did not violate the law, but the one who violated the law is broken it doesn't matter who

he is a politician nobel laureates everything else equal before the law talk to gregory. he is your colleague a journalist, why was he killed? forgive me, they are in the know, i 'm telling you this story. grisha will tell you. after that, he told in detail, but surprisingly no one remembered not about reiner. nobody is such a protoseevich. only the facts are another chic fragments of this conversation very briefly. you know, today in minsk there is a trial of the most famous so -called. well, you see, nevertheless, no western journalists came there. for some reason, they are not interested in him at all. i don't knew this. why didn't you go. eh, protosevich. why doesn't he fire the prisoner? why didn't you go there? why don't

you ask about it? he broke the law, so he sits in the dock. what kind of solution will there be, taking into account. uh, his behavior is repentance and so on. and then it's a court matter, but you didn't go there, to put it mildly, double standards. so i tell you to water any prisoner, you name it, we will explain to you and show what this political prisoner did why he is imprisoned there and then you say water the prisoner, but you don't talk about the fact that we took a step forward, not only with our inner ones. well, those who fled, having committed a right violation here. let's turn the page. come let's figure it out. that is, i personally, there are so many belarusian journalists here, i am sure with my point of view. they do not want our

compatriots hanging out somewhere with you abroad, either in england or in france, i don’t want this. and even in poland where today there is no one to work in hospitals. but bad belarus our doctors are in great demand there. i don't want i want them to live here and work here and we are ready to forgive what can be forgiven. this is the kind of democratic dictatorship we have, and about a chance , a commission has been working in belarus for a week already, which is ready to accept and consider the application of those who have gone abroad, but really want to return home to publicly apologize for their wrong topics every time we see. more and more people made a mistake, succumbed to emotions and so on. each case is ready, to consider individually emotions. and because of including ukraine, now they have enough of a variety of successes from belarus continues in response, poland closes the beaver gardens today, lithuania railway point. why, allegedly, the belarusians representing

the interests of the belarusians, do not defend, uh, the interests of those people who are against the regime here, and it seems, as they are, they still had ways of retreat. well, if you don't like it, they want to run away . now this opportunity is being taken away from them by closing the borders. why do you think they are silent? or maybe they are afraid that after all those belarusians who are now there and who turned out to be deceived will want to return, but it’s not profitable for them to returned, who wants to return, return do not want to return, do not return. if you want to check what will happen to you in belarus well, contact the commission by viewing your question and we will give you an answer. and you'll see if it's worth coming back or not? what is more democratic, perhaps, but sobchuk nadia, i believe her, because i remember her, you can still say from childhood, when she started. a strong belarusian girl has had her sports career. i was very disappointed when i found out that she hesitated there in the twentieth year. she spoke frankly

she said that there are many like her. we were mistaken. we misunderstand it, she said, honestly frankly. what was the team of staffs not to look to close, not to set a bad example, so they are afraid of these processes. tomorrow, our president will have talks with vladimir putin , each meeting is accompanied by conspiracy theories, everything to the heap, and about the loss of sovereignty, a joint attack , mobilization in belarus, another wave in russia, it is clear that there will be a lot of talk about a pseudo agenda, both before and after the visit and discuss security will be, but the main issue. this is not what we are trying to find options for a better life for our people, and tomorrow's meeting with the president of russia is primarily in the interests of the belarusians. in russians. we are later. during this difficult time, we realized that we can do what we can, the russians can do one of the most important issues that we will discuss. we still want to see how the government

of belarus is fulfilling russia, the tasks we have set for the governments, there were many, first of all , economic tasks in terms of energy single market for import substitution. how are these programs financed and implemented? this is a whole range of issues, so we will discuss all issues. and if we come to the question of our joint grouping in belarus of course, we will discuss this closed topics, no, we must now respond to any whist visas and any word of the world will no longer be. the former phrase of our president. this was said at the start of the pandemic. as we can see, it applies to all geopolitical processes and the conflict that accompanies them. moscow to the west today ears are developing rapidly. dangerous weapons, threats and so on. you, as the first and main ally of russia, come out with a solution in this. if you see, then how , given what you are asserting, moscow

claims that today trust has already been lost. you have reached the global level of our conversation at this global level, this is not a conflict between moscow and the west that should be considered. just this global conflict between america and the west. on the one hand, and china on the other hand, this is not russia's main china for them. main, it is considered between the west and china and russia east here. you can connect iran and so on globally, this conflict, and the most acute is the phase of this conflict. this is a conflict between, as you said, moscow and the west, the acute phase of this conflict is such a nuance. this is the first. second well, there is no need to repeat. trust is lost, but it is necessary to talk to the americans. i tried

to get through to bring the position that they are now fighting the whole world. they are at war not only with china, not only with russia, but also with europe , with their allies, they put europe in such a pose, that there is nowhere else. europe is unhappy with this situation. you look into the nord stream blew up. why did natural gas go to europe and there should not be any threads that connect russia with europe, and above all these economic ones, if the foundation is strong the economy between europe and russia is strong, then the rest of the political diplomatic ethical norms. that's it, it will come later, they blew it up. further, protecting their market, the americans made the most attractive conditions for foreign companies in this way. and european companies smelled

better conditions rushed to america. these are friendly steps. look e. recent events with ukraine leopard. two leopard 2 europeans. they strove to defend themselves. we have nothing ourselves, we won’t give tanks, that today, a few weeks later, like nice little drags, these tanks were dragged to ukraine by the macrons, and the schols, and everyone else. well, it’s completely humiliating, who is in control today and the main protagonist in europe, you can name no, i’ll name you the last terrible hyena in europe today i manage it, so i recently had the opportunity i'm honored to say that the best option for europeans is to unite with russia here , resources there. high technologies. and that would be

the main pole. coins the americans and the chinese came to my friendly attitude towards china would be jealous of this alliance and there would be three powerful points on which our planet would rest trust no one else. how to live on alexander lukashenko even after such statements, i was not disappointed, given this situation, and taking into account the external management of the kiev regime in its current configuration, taking into account the laws that they have adopted in a direct veto for negotiations with the leadership of russia, do you consider the kiev regime in its current state, in principle able contracts, and with whom what to talk about absolutely frankly, my point of view is always with whom to talk about the world. i don't think it will seem strange. this dialogue needs to be done.

i am convinced of this from the military, the military of ukraine have, to put it mildly, an excellent point of view and position, unlike the political president zelensky and vladimir zelensky - this is well known and the upcoming reshuffle of the military bloc, as many already say, is just talking about it, but the most professional military is most convinced that a war is needed stop. here you will see that we do not care and the russians director will have to negotiate with the military of ukraine and no politicians, and you see what kind of politicians from all over the world have collected, uh, they say, all the heads. e say you know not to do. as it is customary for us to say the slavs, the ukrainians know this, they say, everyone knows how. but to go there to fight at the front, or at least eat there, during

the battle, they were not there. well, how did you throw his arrest officer away from this one, and there everyone says that the military understands this. military surrounded and so on. soon it will be under artyomovsk bakhmut. people are thrown there like cannon fodder and they are ready to sacrifice millions of ukrainians quote. the military - they understand this and the military will be able to negotiate with russia can agree on the incredible, but it is necessary to take steps in this direction and not set preconditions, before sitting down at the negotiating table, the conversation with journalists lasted more than 3 hours in the details of the negotiations between our president and the leader of the uae, alexander lukashenko's vision of world transformation and new points pillars, as well as all the important theses on ukraine , the conversation turned out with the maximum concentration of relevant statements and answers to all exciting questions, so, of course, this conversation with journalists will become the main topic tomorrow's club of editors, and will also be

discussed on the author's platforms and in the final program of the main broadcast of the television version of the president's interview with foreign belarusian journalists. we will show on saturday at 19:00. as always, it will be very interesting and he is the french veronica botha and ivan martynovich news agency. already today, the statement of the belarusian leader is actively discussed by the expert community, of course, the invitation from our president to the american to come to minsk to talk about peace, he really wants peace for ukraine biden himself, big question. here's how experts comment on this topic? minsk can act as a negotiating platform, which will allow not to erupt. these are the threats from the barricades from behind the front line towards moscow and minsk from washington, but to come directly and talk about how to reach a peace agreement, but to take into account, and

the opinion of all parties a and ukraine and the west and russia, but in order to to find a formula for applying reconciliation in ukraine, and indeed such an option would be interesting if we were sure that a the united states really wants peace, because ukraine is used by the americans to achieve their own goals, and, firstly, the task of exhausting russia has not been solved. secondly, and the robbery of europe, because not all businesses have yet flowed from the european union from germany france a to the united states. therefore, from the point of view of american elis, first of all, democratic elites and even more so, let’s say that group of the democratic party that directly support biden, a their concept is that war should continue while the peace agreements. at the moment, the united states is not needed, they are not interested in peace in ukraine, they want to use ukraine

to weaken russia and belarus, constant subversive work against our countries, president lukashenko, like president putin, demonstrates the readiness of our states to defuse international tension and talking about it, uh, the problem is exclusively with the us which refuses to recognize our national interests and respect our sovereignty and territorial integrity. uh, that's why i i believe that, of course, peace initiatives should be voiced, but taking into account national interests and taking into account the fact that the united states is unlikely to inflict major defeats on ukraine without inflicting major defeats on ukraine . and here is another confirmation of the words of our president that the west is not interested in peace in ukraine; their true desire lies in inciting the ukrainian conflict. this is once again demonstrated by the european parliament. european

mps reject amendment to resolution on ukraine calling for talks documents, in which she said that the european parliament considers ukraine's victory possible only due to continuous and increasing supplies of all types of weapons, it was proposed to replace it with a call to the eu to make efforts to ensure a ceasefire and negotiations. most parliamentarians. he spoke in favor of the steady pumping up of the kiev regime. weapons, an adequate opinion remains, unfortunately, zelensky did not drown and begs for more weapons, but he does not say a word about peace. how many of his people he still ditch before the european commission talks about peace. and how many more people in europe have to leave their jobs or their homes before nato allows these negotiations to take place. i would like to know what happened to germany the locomotive of europe scholz told us that without russia

there will be no peace in europe. first they sent helmets, now they send tanks to kill russians. i'm worried about europe though. bargaining continues ukraine will receive much fewer tanks than it was promised, bloomberg writes with reference to the minister of defense of germany, according to history of germany and portugal is the only one. who committed themselves to send an improved version of leopard 2 14 of them promised berlin three lisbon about 30 obsolete leopards cooked up. poland is true. the condition of many leaves much to be desired. such recognition by germany speaks of the complete failure of the efforts by the west; the possibilities are indeed drying up, understandably, which confirms that the supply of weapons. in ukraine , the european arsenals of weapons are practically devastated. hangars and even in the dumps of decommissioned weapons, with regard to border realities, then the next unfriendly and unconstructive step from vilnius is nothing but iron curtains, the notorious

democracy. lithuania stops cooperation with belarus to ensure the uninterrupted flow of transport across the border. according to the lithuanian side, the state border protection service unilaterally ceases interaction with our customs and border services, from now on , the work of the lithuanian border services, which we have observed over the past few years , is now officially backed up by a certain statement. the lithuanian side did not indicate the reasons for the denunciation of the agreement, this is an unfriendly and unconstructive step on the part of lithuania, such a decision may adversely affect the situation with the rhythm of crossing the border by individuals and vehicles, in fact, from the limiting side, it is trying to relieve itself of responsibility in terms of ensuring the smooth operation of checkpoints. at the same time, the reasons for the termination of interaction are not indicated. let me remind you that the day before, lithuania announced the closure of the railway checkpoint according to the information from the neighboring side

, the resumption of freight traffic is planned after the installation of a stationary x-ray control system from the belarusian side. this is how the american proteges of vilnius decided to show the local population who is the boss in the house, and at the same time defiantly spit on today's national holiday. in lithuania, the day of the restoration of the state. after all, it was on this day in 1918 that an act on the restoration of the country's independence was signed in vilnius. selling independence to ordinary citizens in lithuania, the country has become a solid leader in terms of inflation in the eu over 22 %, solid fuels, fuels and lubricants, gas, heat, electricity, bread, milk, meat, restaurant services, and cafes are becoming more expensive, and therefore the outflow of the population continues, for example, from from january to august last year, 30,000 people left lithuania , twice as many as in the twenty-first year during the same time, and

the 52-kilometer-long barbed fence on the border with belarus cannot hold it back. our president wished the citizens of lithuania the speedy restoration of the state political economic course, which would meet the real interests of the lithuanian people, this is stated in the congratulation that alexander lukashenko sent to the people of lithuania, as the head of state noted. belarusians. we have always aimed at peaceful and friendly coexistence. the centuries-old neighborhood has established inextricable ties between our peoples, the foundation of which is joint families, sincere friendship , a common business memory of history, despite unsuccessful attempts. lithuanian guiding elite to change the government elected by the belarusian people is unreasonable. hostile and deceitful policy towards our country, belarus has been and remains open to the people of lithuania, tuned in to cooperation and dialogue , evidence of this is the decision to extend the visa-free entry procedure for 23 years for you, i know that the lithuanian people also

share the desire to live in harmony with the belarusians. and here are the results of one of the latest questions of public opinion in poland, if briefly they know how to create problems for themselves, this is how simple poles characterize actions leadership of the country the level of approval of the acceptance of refugees from ukraine among citizens. poland is rapidly declining, if in october, and 71% of the respondents confidently declared their willingness to help displaced persons, ask them for housing, provide material support , today there are almost two times less of those who wish, in addition, 38% were categorically against the fact that refugees from ukraine had the opportunity stay in poland also 55% of poles believe that refugees receive more assistance from the state compared to the citizens of poland themselves k unfortunately, the government of the countries neighboring us, whether it be the baltic states or poland, acts solely to please its western

partners, forgetting not only about the interests of its own inhabitants, but also trying to harm its neighbors at all costs, which we have been observing since the twentieth year. today, the trial began in the case of putil rudik and protoseevich, who are the founders of the telegram channel, which was recognized as a terrorist organization last year by a convicted person incriminating inciting social hatred, organizing mass riots and preparation of persons for participation in them, a conspiracy or seizure of power in an unconstitutional way , the creation of an extremist formation and the financing of its activities, details. ksenia has no lebedevs. today, the minsk regional court started a trial in the case of neksta, whose organization was recognized as a terrorist organization last year. this is a telegram channel that in 2020 coordinated protests on the territory of belarus among layan rudik and roman protoseevich accused by stepan, if the latter is in the dock and admits his guilt in in full, then putili and ruzik is

abroad, where they are hiding from the belarusian justice. this is a criminal trinity. in august 2020. an unsanctioned mass event was provoked , which later turned into a photo booth with the police, which was accompanied by molotov cocktails, beating law enforcement officers by riots on the streets of belarusian cities, the accused, in turn, acted as coordinators of the protest. just pay attention to the message that was published on the resource. interesting fact upside down paddy wagon cannot pack people. in the center, at the strength of 30 riot police, three paddy wagons, three minibuses, i ran the whole center, it’s time to leave, and in the stale 2 policemen on the square and two traffic cops in the sections, a couple of cops at most, you can go out and not be afraid. do not hand over the detainees, stand in a couple in the event of the arrival of law enforcement agencies and the start of detentions, the first thing you should