the lord resurrects his own

and what about the world around you?

lord, we sing a baking sheet to sin in sin save the lord to seek the lord is after me live panorama in the studio elena savicheva hello and peace war politics real situation economic provocations and symmetrical answers for three hours, the president of belarus

answered questions from foreign and belarusian journalists, when there is a request for consolidation of society, the belaya rus association initiated the formation of a new party and the main region of russia where so a lot of belarusian new film from the cycle. sakhalin is nowhere closer. today, right after us , the picture of the day will be completed by my colleagues. spontaneous and very frank interview of our president to foreign and belarusian media, on which journalists insisted so much about ukraine , a chance for the fugitives to return to their homeland and tomorrow's meeting with putin. . lithuania is unilaterally terminated interaction with our customs and border services the case is next. what punishment awaits the accused and which of them has already pleaded guilty in full

? we will tell you how the work in the rescue town works in our material. innovations from medicine is quite an intellectual exhibition of belarus began its journey through the regions , the first stop is gomel the latest news from the world of football and hockey. about war and peace, geopolitics of the regional situation, economic provocations and symmetrical answers, for 3 hours the president of belarus answered questions from foreign and belarusian journalists. this event in the president's schedule was completely unplanned and sudden at first. a little backstory that led to this meeting for

more than a dozen reporters. strange. this is the united states britain the state of europe africa and asia organized preston media representatives visited the border with ukraine, of course, they were told about the current situation in this area, including provocative actions on the ukrainian side. many did not limit themselves to this point only, they visited other cities at the industrial enterprises of our country and that's it. at this time, someone was asking for a meeting with the president of belarus, someone comments, and someone about a full-fledged interview alexander lukashenko today admits that it was not in the spirit of belarusian hospitality to refuse. all participants. prestur was invited to the palace of independence, and in that belarusian and russian journalists here is such a spontaneous meeting without any preparation of previously known questions , journalists asked about what many people wanted to have repeatedly been to belarus and even personally communicated with alexander lukashenko, but taking into account the agenda and all the events taking place around our country, the central theme became,

of course, ukraine, in which case is belarus ready to use the army? why has the fighting not stopped so far? and who is really ready to talk about peace in ukraine now? we will definitely show this. of course, the journalists were also interested in the agenda of the meeting with vladimir putin , which will take place tomorrow, the situation at the border, the chance for the fugitives to return home in belarus, the results of alexander lukashenko's visits to africa and the middle east, ilona krasunskaya will tell about everything in more detail. today, it clearly illustrates what the unpredictable presidential schedule of half belarusian journalists is, in general, they were preparing for another event, and as a result, they met the collection of the whole world in the palace while they were here in the parish. every day they showed their reporter persistence, they say, we want an interview with lukashenka, but when our president is in the comments, at least someone was refused, some had to go, right with personal belongings, because the plane or train was scheduled. not me, not you, did not prepare for it, but maybe

it would be better to talk about it, after looking at the composition of our meeting today. i see here old acquaintances of mine who came to me, and we very thoroughly, and some time ago, uh, talked with them in different ways on different topics. i think that in dynamics look at the problems that they are and which they are so persistent. uh, tried to give me some problems and threads to blame. i think this is another one. well, such an interesting feature of our meeting today is a spontaneous meeting, but it does not replace and does not change the announced big conversation with the president. it will certainly take place at night later, as the head of state said. now another priority event is preparing for a message to the people and parliament, where fundamental things will be announced. we are preparing

the message is absolutely frank will be the reaction to all questions. well, a little forward. we will try, as i always say, to look within the framework of this message. therefore , a certain overlay is obtained, and we decided to postpone the big conversation for a while. time goes fast. uh, many issues of the topic speak the journalistic language of their development, and we will find time to get together here and have a serious talk as part of a big conversation, and now the guests have the floor for journalistic issues, but there will be a spoiler. many questions. you have already heard not two , not five, and not even 10 times, and in the hall are well-known people steven rosenberg from the bbc for example , alexander lukashenko was interviewed a year ago , he opens this conversation. how could you have imagined that he would ask something else a year ago. uh, the russian army invaded ukraine, including from the territory of belarus. that is, you allowed, but

now use your territories as a substitute for the invasion. are you ready to do it again if the president of russia asks briefly at first. eh, yes, ready to listen to me further. do not cut out this phrase just so that you understand my reaction date, why are you ready? i have already brought this point of view to high-ranking officials m, who wear epaulettes on their shoulders. in the western world, i will not specify. i brought exactly this point of view. i am ready and not just to provide, but ready to fight together with the russians from the territory of belarus only in one case so far, if at least one soldier with a gun comes to our territory from there to kill my people in a civilized language,

i say, not to the people, if you are talking about ukraine from the territory of ukraine , yes, this applies not only to ukraine. this also applies to our other neighbors, who behave even more inappropriately, if they commit aggression against belarus, the answer will be the most severe. the most cruel and the war will acquire a completely different character , plus or minus the same wording, but the underlying reason is to try to catch lukashenka on the question of this, of course, it's very funny to watch you say invasion. and i believe not invasion i'm sorry i was almost in charge incumbent in the fourteenth fifteenth. there, in the years when the clashes between russia and ukraine began, i was absolutely in the subject, no one else was in this topic, because both the position of putin’s russia and the position of ukraine poroshenko were on my table. i saw all this, and i talked many times about, uh, how could it all end,

what did putin ask me about and i brought to poroshenko and what did i answer? poroshenko i brought to putin tossed between the two, so that this would not happen. rhetorical question, i always when you evaluate a situation, you ask yourself. why did the authorities of ukraine begin to strangle russians and russians in ukraine and donbas? why did they drink, kill them, and so on. after all, the problem is, and these events in the donbass did not begin with putin or with russia, they began as an internal indignation in ukraine itself and the impetus for this was given by maidan and flight, yanukovych’s departure at that moment he went to the donbass to restore order in the donbass ukraine that's where it all started. and here is putin

. and here russia is also such a fact, irrefutable irrefutable, so i'm not talking about insulting everyone and everything you burned people in odessa whom you burned. no nationalist-minded people, well, or how to say the nazis now. i don’t want to use these theses and i don’t want definitions, but they burned people who had a different point of view in a democratic state through democratic supervision and mostly russian-speaking people, remember in odessa. therefore , this is not an invasion by the ukrainian authorities, they themselves provoked this operation it was necessary then negotiate with russia that there should be no of this war, but everything was aimed,

including the minsk agreements, i repeat, that was aimed at unleashing a war in order to prepare ukraine for this war, you can’t prepare. they say it wrong, ukraine was only an excuse. to start this war, the reasons for this were wanted, the united states of america and someone in western europe now, of course, they have sobered up. well, probably, but for great britain, first of all, they pushed ukraine into this war. well, we got this war. and there is no invasion intrusions. i think it wasn't. you consider this an invasion. i think this is the protection of the interests of russia and those people. if those people who lived there, the russian people, there is a lot of talk about the possible achievement of peace in ukraine, but the fact remains that there is no result, in the first, not that during the hours of the special operation lukashenka called zelensky to talk to attempt

to resolve the conflict, minsk provided its platform for negotiations, but the so -called negotiators. at first they agreed, then for days they rode on the relay to belarus then completely disappeared from the radar. and ukraine c. the result was banned at the legislative level. whatever negotiations you want peace in ukraine let's start talking about peace tomorrow and the guns will stop firing. let's start tomorrow. i know what i am saying. well, you don't want that. you don’t want this, but you will jump to the point that the military will come to kiev and turn the heads of politicians together with zelensky, the ukrainian military will come to kiev and put everyone in their place, because they are a meat grinder, and you run around europe and under applause, ask for some fighter weapons and stuff. today you are the culprits of the escalation, you can blame russia. okay, we will proceed from yours, but today people are dying, about whom you said, let's stop this.

let's do it all now. uh, there's no for that, you don't want that. and i won't even say. you in europe are ready for this. europe wants this. she knows that maybe the americans don't want this and tilted europe put her in a pose. and i do whatever they want with it. here is the situation, and you ask some questions there aggression, will there be aggression from the side? belarus well, i have already answered this a thousand times 12 - this is an ancient question. i look at grisha azaryonka. he falls asleep when you asked this question, because he has long understood. it is known that we are peaceful people. we know what war is. we do not want war, and we are by no means going to send our troops to the territory of ukraine, if only you from there and commit aggression against belarus at the beginning of next week, the biden

flies to poland to work out the agenda from warsaw to minsk, 50 minutes of flight, how they say, if so parents, you can continue talking about the world, welcome to belarus alexander lukashenko invites you personally and even putin will fly up to meet in minsk. here, the three of us are two aggressors and a peace-loving president. why not for the sake of ending the war? now, if he wants to end the war? and i'll send a plane to the crackers, if anything, it hurts, it's accepted. we have a sea of ​​​​international airports, its number one landing here was once clinton flew in on a similar plane. and here in your presence, the three of us. i guarantee you that vladimir vladimirovich putin will come here, the three of us will sit down and solve the whole problem, we will solve all problems here, our president is a frank person, even. if someone does not like it, calls a spade a spade, perhaps something could not be made public, but he will not be this public

check. panic would have been unavoidable, as it was perceived by insight intelligence data. i read them , you want to involve belarus in the war, this is already being proposed by the minister of defense. stupid neighboring states to be drawn into belarus in the war. do you dream about it so that we crossed the border of ukraine poland lithuania why the border with ukraine we have 1.200 km. in poland or yours is 1.300 how much is 2.500? if we are drawn into the war, the front thus increases for belarus and russia by 2,500 km. it means that we russia, our allied group, will not be able to fight all this, quotes from documents, will not be able to fight there from

the black sea to the baltic, the correct military calculation will not be able to fight yet, because we are not preparing for the war for mobilization in belarus we are not conducting the second third mobilization. russia did not announce the correct calculation, but empty stupid we will not give you this chance. but if only you dare to enter our earth, the answer will be terrible. the westerners know what and with what weapon the answer will be terrible. and then you won't argue. and what about the army in belarus of 25-30 thousand, we have an army of 75,000 in peacetime, but if you dare to fight with us, we deploy an army of up to 250,000, this is half a million in the first stage, in the second third stage. so we are now training, so do not

mislead people, no one needs war and for now not today. here is this aggression of expanding its this aggression. let's negotiate peace. east side ready for it if you're ready for it i say if because i know you're not just not ready. it would be a terrible tragedy for you if peace negotiations began now, you need a war, they already catch teenagers on the street , catch them on the street in ukraine and send them. that is , someone has already escaped there, someone has died, there is no one to fight there, but you don’t stop. you are slowly starting your military there throw more than twenty thousand mercenaries. they are fighting there, these are people from outside. how much is lukashenko zero? and you reproach me that i am

going to or have started some kind of war there from my people i am sending there. no, i don’t send people there and i’m not going to do it if such a situation suddenly developed that one of my colleagues already asked the question that you also wanted to ask, not a single belarusian journalist would repeat it, firstly, this not professional and you need to respect someone else's time, especially when they asked for so long meeting with the president himself, but again, in the tenth round, the austrian colleagues put the mobilization of the so-called part of belarus into such a formulation. yesterday i was on the border with you in the brest region, and on the border with ukraine, and we showed us there, and the fortifications from the ukrainian side. we then talked with local ukrainians there, but i didn’t want to ask, but in

the form of the local population, i got the impression that literally everyone was anxious. and what can you say, uh, in your countrymen to these people, and who are afraid that their sons will be sent to the territory of ukraine to participate in hostilities. yes, there is anxiety, especially this anxiety appeared. after the rocket fell on that territory, wherever they were, but if the rocket flew from there. so tomorrow the soldier and the president may come. that is, i constantly say this, if someone comes from there, we will be forced to defend ourselves. the basis of anxiety is in this, and not in the fact that i will gather their children from the bay and send them to ukraine there in the west i called people with a fifth see . such a scenario. they want us to go there and not only there, preferably in poland and lithuania, and it was power. what they want. but

we'll only go one way, as long as there's no other. therefore, these people can be calm, but still they will be anxious. do you have children. not yet, now, when you have your own children, then you will understand me and those people will understand, no matter how i convince you. in this, if there is even the slightest probability and danger, he will still be worried, therefore our people are in this anxiety. well, they agree with me and believe that i will do what you want. i say. well, i didn’t finish, after all, my most important task is even more important than going to ukraine, but only the brainless in the west do not understand this. i have to ensure the security of the country, first of all in the west and in the first days of military operations. i said it. you see

how it behaves more. how lithuania is behaving so far from an economic point of view. they constantly provoke transferring responsibility to the belarusians to me. so they closed the checkpoints. e. what is this? this is an economic provocation. so, trade no, it means no economy. and gradually, gradually, they arrange these provocations, well, axes before the time. right now we are thinking about how we have decided how to respond to this, we will respond. soft. at first they will not understand by effort. we also have enough leverage for this. it still leads to bad things. we didn't want this. why, even if the reporters do not share the point of view of alexander lukashenko , they still go to belarus, cut off the phones , insist on an interview, the answer is obvious, because these are 100% ratings millions of views. yes, and you need to work out the task of the editors, bloodthirsty belarus from here. all these questions

with unpretentious background , not a single interview has done without mobilization to water the prisoners and dictators, who are the internal situations of the country, and hundreds were whole, and hmm, long-standing sentences, and the journalists are a bunch. ah, when will it stop? we have people in prison, and you have people in prison. there is a bad law, but it is the law . we don't have any political prisoners, because we don't have such a political article in the criminal code. well, you came up with it yourself and talk in the west, political prisoners political prisoners and so on and so forth people with different political views thousands of thousands of hundreds of thousands of people, they live in our society from different points of view, but they have not violated the law,

and the one who violates the law is violated no matter who he is a nobel politician laureates other all equal before the law talk to gregory. he is your colleague a journalist, why was he killed? well, you see, all the same, no western journalists came there. for some reason, they are not interested in him at all. i don't knew this. why didn't you go. eh, protosevich. why doesn't he fire the prisoner? why didn't you go there? why don't

you ask about it? he broke the law, so he sits in the dock. what kind of solution will there be, taking into account. uh, his behavior is repentance and so on. and then it's a court matter, but you didn't go there, to put it mildly, double standards. here, i'm telling you to name any political prisoner, we will explain to you and show that this is a police prisoner. why is he incarcerated there, and then you say water the prisoner, but you don't talk about the fact that we took a step forward, not only with our inner ones. well, those who fled, having committed an offense here. let's turn the page. come let's figure it out. that is, i personally, there are so many belarusian journalists here, i am sure with my point of view. they do not want our

compatriots hanging out somewhere with you abroad, either in england or in france, i don’t want this. and even in poland where today there is no one to work in hospitals. but the bad one, belarus our doctors are in great demand there. i don't want i want them to live here and work here and we are ready to forgive what can be forgiven. this is our democratic dictatorship. for a week now, a commission has been working in belarus, which is ready to accept and consider the application of those who went abroad, but really want to return home with a public apology. i confess to my wrong topic every time we see. more and more people made a mistake , succumbed to emotions and so on. each case is ready to consider individually emotions, and for including ukraine, now they are enough of the most miscellaneous spectra from belarus continues in response, poland closes the beaver gardens today, lithuania railway point. why, allegedly

, the belarusians representing the interests of the belarusians, do not defend, uh, the interests of those people who are against the regime here, and it seems, as they are, they still had ways of retreat. well, if you don't like it , they want to run away. now this opportunity is being taken away from them by closing the borders. why do you think they are silent? or maybe they are afraid that after all those belarusians who are now there and who ended up they will want to return deceived, but it is not profitable for them to return now, who wants to return, return do not want to return, do not return. if you want to check what will happen to you in belarus well , contact the commission by viewing your question and we will give you an answer. and you'll see if it's worth coming back or not? what is more democratic, perhaps, but sobchuk nadia, i believe her, because i remember her, you can still say from childhood, when she started. as a strong belarusian girl during her sports career, i was very disappointed. when found out that she ate there.