imitation of the sun's rays and light that simulates the sun, uh, heats the panel, uh, converts the energy of the sun into energy for heating water for the house. now we are at -20 mark. this is the lowest point of our quarry, if we compare it with the level of the baltic sea, then we will say 20 m under water and share the intricacies of our work, which they simply adore . yes, it looks like a toy will carry 90 tons of rock. we are laying a foundation for the future. to introduce innovation. this is a concern for the state, and the nation for its education. look, project one day on tv channel belarus 24.

the motto of our participants is not to give up, to fight and go to the end. as far as i remember, it is necessary to say did not laugh. they laughed at me . and i chose the betty option - one. how is that? i remember exactly that in this word only the letter p is doubled. each time, they

surprise us with their reasoning, there are few hills. here, but let's have a chance to restore the tower, we are sure of our answer. yes, of course, and they do everything possible to pick up the main prize. main inventory hard answer. anton watch intellectually entertaining shows on belarus 24 tv channel.

my name is igor skrinnikov. i am the deputy minister for tax collections and today we will talk about all the innovations that have taken place in the tax legislator since january 1 , 23 and relate to individual entrepreneurs. hello, on the air, the program, say, do not be silent in the studio, victoria popova and tatyana shcherbina and today igor skrinnikov is our guest. good afternoon. igor viktorovich

exactly six months ago in the same studio. we are with you discussed the intention to change the country's system of taxation. in particular , they talked about the fact that individual entrepreneurs would significantly reduce the payment of a single tax, and then many citizens said that we were burying entrepreneurship. remember, we discussed this with specific examples. now in february 23, what can you say about the statistics, how our entrepreneurs are getting used to the new system, of course, since january 1, 23, a number of changes have occurred, that is, the changes that she announced in twenty second year. they were implemented with the adoption of amendments to the tax code. as for the directly possible flow of individual entrepreneurs, that is. well, probably now, even in mid- february, but for now it's premature to say definitively. who will be transformed into what tax regimes, because the general tax reporting will be generated based on the results of the first quarter

precisely understanding this provided tax legislation for our individual entrepreneurs to decide during the first quarter on the types of tax regimes that they ultimately want to accept you can say that we are seeing a mass exodus many have said goodbye to their entrepreneurship definitely not, because at this stage . i can only say that, well, these are extremely preliminary figures, that we see a certain reduction in certain tax regimes, but at the same time, a multiple increase in other tax regimes in particular. here is what concerns the new tax regime that we have implemented for individuals , the professional tax. well, let's talk again. the reasons that caused these changes, what happened? well , first of all, what has changed, that is, on january 1 , 23, the simplified taxation system for individual

entrepreneurs plus was finally abolished. if so, there is a global discussion on this topic, that is, we have raised the rates on all taxes that remain for individual entrepreneurs. that is it income tax and single tax payment system. why was this done in the first place? as i already said? that is, we have. we have already counted three tax solutions, and this is a plurality of taxation regimes. that is, we understood that the plurality of taxation regimes for one small category of business. this is not very good, and the multiplicity of taxation regimes with different tax burdens, respectively, led well to unfair competition. and moreover, here again, even if we abstract from the global part competition, well, with organized business , these categories, and competed between you and this is the application of a different tax burden to a self-employed category of individuals who could carry out activities without registering as an individual entrepreneur, individual entrepreneur with their tax

regimes. that is, it led to nu incorrectness in determining tax liabilities. not even, probably, not in this more, but to their unreasonable competition among themselves, so we decided to streamline this system according to this one of these stages. this is the step by step minimization of the alignment clear system of taxation. well, the first was the abolition of the simplified tax system more. well, not to mention the fact that, of course , the simplified taxation system has not fully realized itself, in our opinion , for individual entrepreneurs, because why, probably, we took a radical step, including on the chair, that is, in addition to all of the above this is the possibility of using this taxation system in tax manipulations, therefore, this, among other things , influenced the fact that islam had from me on today, and entrepreneurs have the right to apply two taxation regimes correctly. tell us more about them. well, this is income tax from entrepreneurial activity,

which is what i was talking about and the single tax payment system, well, the single tax payment system certainly implies. it's called the single tax. that is, these are fixed payments. why did we again raise the single tax rates, that is, well , here we need to proceed from the fact that a, according to the analysis, based on this analysis, which was carried out by us of the tax service. we we saw, uh, a rather low level of tax burden precisely by the supply of a single tax, up to the point that up to 22 years, as i always give an example, and an individual entrepreneur who feels activity, well, in the form of retail trade in the largest prestigious shopping centers in the city of minsk , they paid a monthly the amount of the single tax is less than the average citizen of the city of minsk has their own average salary received in the city. that is, and the amount was much less today, you left them in the list of those large shopping centers who can pay a single

tax, but have raised the rate. we last year in the twenty-second year. we raised the single tax rate to 13% of the tax exemption level. that is, this is the total income tax rate this year already in the twenty- third year. the increase was associated with an equalization by bringing the level of tax exemption to 16%, that is, in fact. this is the level of tax exemption that exists with income tax, if paychecks are used, well, such a simplified accounting procedure, relatively speaking, therefore, having increased the rates here, although again, i would like to immediately, probably, draw attention to the fact that, and if we nevertheless followed these positions of our actual bringing up to 16% withdrawal, tax rates, in particular in the city of minsk, would have to be understood, not even up to three times, as it has been implemented four to five times. that is , we just thought that it would be. still quite high and it has been suggested that there is an increase of up to three times. this is what concerns single tax rates. well, i wonder why you

are so loving, i would say to those who sit. in in general, in these shopping centers. uh, and is engaged in the sale of goods to this category of people. well, probably, but it shouldn't be otherwise, because these are our payers. it's like i always say to the absolute majority of our payers. they are bogus. certainly understandable. we really know we understand that there is a possible concealment of income. but these are still our lamentations, and we must work with them so that they pay in full and in good faith. for our part, we must certainly create conditions for them to pay. tax. well, in particular the single tax. that is, it may be, of course, not quite correctly perceived that we are creating conditions, but by raising the united tax, we are pushing them to switch to a more organized and civilized form of business vision and the appropriate application of taxation.

directed, because it is clear that the system of paying unified fixed payments of unified taxes is, but extremely unpopular in general , we can say if we accept the global trend, because often, but it is difficult to determine, but the real fair rate of taxes, because someone will always pay more, someone will pay less , someone will oppose taxes, in general, there are such world practices, of course, probably, yes, uh, but as a rule, this is associated with the strange middle east which is rich in oil and other natural resources. unfortunately, we cannot allow ourselves to do this, that is, we proceed from the fact that the tax system must be fair and that each taxpayer must fulfill the tax obligation in good faith. well, as a result quarter. here are your forecasts to change or the number of taxes paid hmm i do not assume unambiguously, because i will say, so and we just tried to separate the opposition either. posnoe personality

and present this trend last year, when exactly the same was the hay increase in tax rates, then the simplified tax system increased and the single rate, as i already pointed out, increased at the end of the twenty-second year. they happened in no way decline. in principle, the total global number of individual entrepreneurs. this did not happen, and the decline in revenue from individual entrepreneurs. yes, the level of income from individual entrepreneurs in total income controlled by the tax authorities. it is always from year to year, in fact, plus or minus the same from two to two and a half percent. that is, this trend continues, but if we compare it with last year, again, about last year, then there is a decrease in revenue. we did not see, but in general, comparable valuable ones from individual entrepreneurs, and payments increased by about 14%. individual entrepreneurs. on

taxation issues, she spoke about the fact that it is extremely important for our authorities that they understand this new system. and er, it means that they continued to develop. you also attended this seminar. what do you think , well, it was interesting whether your meeting was one thing with us journalists. it is a different matter to be discussed when hundreds of such not very smiling elits look at you, it is desirable. well, i would not say, probably, that they were not very friendly, just the same our meeting. here in the city of minsk she passed one of my mind, extremely constructive. i immediately said before the meeting, what uh? we are here to discuss. tell explain why all or other measures were taken and hear. if there is a constructive proposal, this is what this dialogue platform was for. i will not say that there were some direct, but super proposals, that is, the majority, but all those present,

but i am talking about the entrepreneurial environment. that is, business people. still, they were interested. as much as possible under the current circumstances. what modes can be applied and how correctly and correctly unconditionally fulfill tax obligations, that is, this was also the goal of our event in many respects. this means that the majority of entrepreneurs are ready, yes, to lead unconditionally unconditionally. and it's important to them. why are we even now on purpose, when, including this year now, when we made adjustments on purpose, yes, this is a temporary lacquer about the first quarter. why do i say that the correct figures for statistics on admission are based on the results? we will understand already by the results of the first quarter, that is, we specifically laid down this temporary varnish, to do business , this small business is often, which well , not always, but have the appropriate education. that is, so that they can still calmly figure it out and choose for themselves the taxation system that will be most comfortable and convenient for them. again , based on the criteria that have been established

, we, for our part, are accordingly conducting the most large-scale russian work, that is, starting from the central office of the ministry for the tax collection ending with all our inspections. well, it really is. so, before recording , we also discussed the article again, that we ourselves are ready to become individual entrepreneurs. here i didn't want tax advice. yes, but it’s true by tax consultants, but now i don’t ask a little about them, but this temporary varnish generally concerns how we have it today, if i didn’t pay something and so on, it’s as soon as a fine arrives at me. well, not quite so, again, we proceed from the fact that and then what we said in the very. or that is now us for individual entrepreneurs there are two systems of taxation from january 1, twenty-three? and the fact that the simplified tax system has been canceled in our country is often asked if i need to go somewhere to the inspection to send some notification statements, messages , etc. and so on, that i am already a non-payer of heights , this system of taxation is not in the law, so there are no notifications, no messages,

no visits, all the more it is not necessary to do so. and here the question is those who were on the single tax, respectively, the single tax is paid in advance and the declaration an advance is presented, that is, and accordingly the majority of the flesh boxes of conscientious carpenters. they submitted a tax return before january 1, 23. uh, the rates for january were the old rates, the new rates. these are elevated. they will be applied, only now they are applied from february 1, respectively. ah. if we follow the norms of the law without all the time lags that we implemented , then i applied for a single tax, sort of, like during. where should we already apply it, but again, understanding that people need to decide. we gave this temporary cloud, the whole first quarter. that is , they look if he sees that his business is not entirely convenient for a single tax. he always has the opportunity to switch to an income tax system, because income tax is fair

taxation, there is income and you pay. no income. you don't pay anything. and here, this is the most correct and fair tax regime, in contrast to the single tax, because you always have to pay there. the most important advance. we are entrepreneurs in stock it remains possible e to register as an individual and e, to carry out activities without the status of an individual entrepreneur, paying tax on professional income. e according to statistics. uh, well, five entrepreneurs. well, not a small part, but they chose this very alternative form of tax payment. and why do you think, well , firstly, this is the tax regime, about which we have already promoted it, which we advertised on january 1, 2023, and the tax on professional income. this is a completely digitalized tax regime absolutely remote tax regime, which does not require any physical interaction of the real interaction of the tax service and the carpenter. that is

, it is quite simple, and this one again, but returning to what i started from the very beginning, that is, my colleagues and i, that is, this economic bloc. uh, in the government, the ministry of finance is not on the economy, that is, we are conducting systematic work to create a clear system. that is, there are, relatively speaking, kids, that is, these are citizens who decided to try themselves in the business that he he alone is an individual and he decided to try his hand at business. here is for him there is currently tax income. this is an absolutely simple tax regime with a total rate of 10%, which also absorbs the deduction of the french protection in order for this individual to be able to. earn more for your future pension, that is, in the future, if you are already growing, developing, and a want to expand your business. you can go to the category of individual entrepreneurs. there is an opportunity to attract hired persons already up to three people and then the next step is already implementation. organization of the creation of a legal entity. well, there are already craftsmen

who have counted. yes, approximately, if your income does not exceed a thousand conventional rubles there, then it makes no sense to pay a single one. exactly. it is more convenient to choose this mode, it is definitely more profitable. yes, but here you need to understand that in order to become a payer of the pass tax and must meet all the criteria that are defined by the legislator, first of all , the activity must be deducted absolutely independent, you should not have employers, plus everything. you must fit into the framework that is determined by law in relation to the list of activities that are currently allowed to be carried out here . i must say right away that i am often asked a question. why? well, the list of activities is somewhat limited. we proceed from the fact that these are individuals, they do not carry out entrepreneurial activities. because they are not registered as individual entrepreneurs and a under the first article the civil code clearly defines the types of activities that can be deceived and not registered

as an individual entrepreneur. that is, therefore, the list, which is determined by a government decree. it, in fact, corresponds to the types of activities that are listed in the civil code. another point is that we understand that this may not be enough, and we are working with her in the economy to ensure that this list may be expanded, but all the proposals that we will work out and to contribute further the government will certainly be based on a detailed analysis in doing so, but really understanding that the category of citizens that can fall into this tax regime. this is the so-called freelancing, we specifically, without waiting for the adjustments of the civil code. so, when we were preparing the tax legislation for these years, we brought this category of freelance into a separate category and we specifically provided for them the possibility of doing business to be a taxpayer on the right to income on january 1, 23 in this part there, and the main criteria. you gotta work like i said one on one's own. you must find your customer via the internet. you must provide

services to perform work not together, the customer's money and the result of the work performed , the services provided must be transmitted via the internet. that is, then you fall under the category of freelance and, accordingly , you can easily apply the tax on professional income, but here it’s right to say right away that we have established and defined a separate restriction and brought it to our carpenters. this applies to certain types of professional services, the deductions of which are associated, or you are required to obtain a license to permit other documents, or such activities, only to an individual. i managed to find an employer via the internet, not an employer of the employer’s customer, just the same, he should not have, because it’s just the same. we also draw attention to the fact that, dear colleagues, uh, so that there is no possible substitution of labor relations, because if we see that there is a legal entity, and that with

which sometimes individual subjects, involving in their employees, transferring into the category of individual entrepreneurs. this is where the substitution we identified showed higher tax liabilities. now, taking into account the fact that the simplified tax system has left, we see that it is possible that, according to certain requests, questions of use are being worked out, and categories of tax payers. we are immediately different from him, perhaps yes, that is, when the activity is carried out transparently. that is, i am the payer of the entry tax. i always say. well you must be absolutely independent of its customer. that is, if the customer, especially if it is your former employer, clearly dictates to you what you should do? who should you do? how much should you do? and most importantly - the income that i earn. i will then hand it over to this, seemingly external manager,

that is, of course, we will present higher tax liabilities, because this is a scheme that is associated with the substitution of labor relations. well, what will prevent him from registering perry and performing again and again and again the customer is registered, of course, lots and lots. i will say this by creating this system. why, again, our main message is the maximum transfer of business to digitalization here due to the fact that this is an absolutely digital mode, we simultaneously implemented a number of analytical tools that we use and given the significant amount of information that is generated by the tax authorities. we just analyze and we see these flows. we are literally at the end of the first quarter. i will even say not according to the results of the first quarter. i'm not even in order not to wait for the first quarter, already in january, he instructed our inspectorates to ensure that we already orientate individual mistaken individuals that they incorrectly apply the tax on passage and, moreover, we

see this absolutely remotely. that is, we do not need to run after him to check him and so on. that is, we see this based on the analysis of our information systems, and we have instructed our tax services to ensure that we are such payers who, in our opinion , are mistaken, so that we now have them on time oriented so that later there would be no reason for us to present higher tax liabilities. let's take a short break, i remind you, we have a telegram channel. say don't be silent. subscribe ask questions and suggest guests we are in touch. on the air say again, don't be silent, and our guest is igor skrinnikov, deputy minister for taxes and dues. igor viktorovich, it is very interesting to discuss such a figure with you , it was said on this cripple that in the budget for january 1 in minsk yes from individual entrepreneurs

received 374.5 million rubles. what is slightly more than 2% of the budget, how would you comment on this figure, is it a lot or a little? well, always when we talk about numbers. probably this is an extremely conditional concept , that is, well, it is difficult to determine whether it is a lot or a little, that is, when i look at the list of people who are busy and who belong to individual entrepreneurs. it seems to me that, well, as if there were a very large mass of them in the city, of course. this is a big mass. yes, yesterday i was literally here our colleagues. there, the special services sent me a link, including including the amounts paid by an individual entrepreneur or one of the bloggers. i laid out how many kindergartens can be built. ladies there sports facilities and so on. yes, yes, yes, this is certainly good and the message is what it is about. i have already said, that is, but we are confused by something else, that we do not see the next step. that is our

category of individual entrepreneurship. she stalled. it is simply in an even mode, but in a light mode, that is, these two two and a half percent of the total budget revenues, controlled by the tax authorities. they are all for 10-15 years. this is one and the same indicator, that is, we do not see progress and the reforms that we propose. this is just the same in the first place, not even on the subject of increasing this share in budget revenues in order to create more modern business conditions and thus pushing this category to the next step towards growth in the first. and from here, there will certainly be an attraction of tax revenues in the future, but again, if going back to raising tax levels is clear to them, then definitely. this is , first of all, the equalization of the tax burden in order to minimize unfair tax competition, therefore, to say this is a lot of

deceit- not all of this is very conditional, of course. this is good. i can say unequivocally, because of course these amounts form local budgets. and accordingly, there is a development of the social sphere, and so on and so forth. let's igor viktorovich now consider special cases, but the introduction, why is a single tax being introduced for individual entrepreneurs renting housing? and this began last year. well, first of all, he was the only tax for them. it is now not introduced this, well, last year, when there was the first wave. here's an increase in single tax rates. we paid attention to uh, the flow of individual entrepreneurs who feel the short-term rental of property, ah. it is in the tax regime where income tax is paid. and what immediately embarrassed us in this part, and those incomes that were recorded as single tax payers when we compared them with the income that we began to reflect

as income tax. we saw a decrease, that is, an increase in the number of income tax payers in plus. but at the same time, a multiple decrease in income is negative. and this despite the fact that the twenty-second year was quite active for the most part in terms of tourist demand. we really understood that this market was quite in demand, and we really understood that, and in this part it goes. well, not entirely conscientious, but in my opinion, even somewhere a severe reduction and concealment of the objects of taxation of their own. that is , it is absolutely true that landlords lease under the contract, for example, for rubles, but in reality it is absolutely true in order to simply, but regulate this area. we decided that this, and the type of activity should be carried out using just the same single tax. we determined the rates, we did not raise them so much that, uh, this

business still became unprofitable, but at the same time, what is the peculiarity of this mechanism, and single tax payers to the declaration present an application that reflects the list of objects that are for rent, and taking into account the information resources that we have, including analytical systems that analyze advertisements. we can easily identify objects that are offered for short-term lease and compare them with those objects that we have declared as an object of taxation, due to which, even if tax is not paid on these identified objects, we will simply simply present the amount of a single skill, that is, we have reformatted our work, that is, if before, in particular, with income tax, we certainly had to run around the city, i’ll say it straight and let’s look for them, who is there, an unscrupulous payer, rents out these apartments, but

they don’t pay anything . now we will simply analyze our information systems and present them with tax liabilities for payment. that's what it was for when the internet, remember? absolutely right, because right here. unfortunately. yes, our apartments are very wide change used booking, that is, they used these services, and we really understood that the lion's share of income does not go to the republic of belarus at all , that is, we were actually provided with the facts when these payers, these foreign platforms open accounts outside the republic of belarus to these accounts outside the republic of belarus, another point is that this pressure has led to the fact that these foreign sites are not working now absolutely right and they still need to work within our segment, including internet segment. and here is our field of action, including a new one from the list and in

physics, which can pay a single tax. you were services extensive. the list actually. e according to this scheme. you, too, from this, those activities that we have reduced, and they have been reduced. these are only those species that were little used by our weeping, that is, they are essentially from the total number. that is, last year we had almost 33,000 single-tax payers of individual entrepreneurs there. that is, if we saw that there were some other types of activity, they were not actually carried out, or they wandered around, relatively speaking, up to 500 people in the ip wheel. i mean, well, here it is. these species offered their reduction. therefore, first of all, it concerns individuals, as the experience of our previous meeting showed, e spectator. uh, crime stories are the most popular. uh, look at the screen. it is reported that the director of the building was inherited with the help

of the company for which the lease was drawn up, he decided to legalize the money, but in fact, the entrepreneur asked the premises to himself. it is not surprising that his activities attracted attention. according to the documents of the enterprise, it did not work, but in reality the income was regular and, as it turned out, the ip belonged to a relative who had no relation to the business of such fictitious partners. the merchant had a lot of actual profits going to controlled private enterprises thanks to. what significantly reduced the income of the main company and several times decreased taxes. this was done in order to obtain tax preferences for the use of special the taxation regime and the payment of taxes in a smaller amount, in fact, the activity was carried out by one enterprise, which had to pay vat income tax income tax, that is, payment. technology in accordance with the generally established procedure, according to the results of the audit, it was established that the businessman did not

pay more than 200,000 rubles. taxes under the business splitting scheme, and the money received as a result of the gray scheme, the owner of the building spent on his own needs. well, we see that the multiplicity of these tax regimes lead to grey. schemes for sure. yes, ah, again, including and based on this , we proposed these possible restrictions , first of all, as far as the simplified tax system is more concerned, because that's what, i said, at the very beginning of the simplified tax system and entrepreneurship . they didn't justify themselves. not only is there a low tax burden, but a low tax burden. she contributed to the creation of possible schemes for the manipulation of tax liabilities. and most importantly, again, this is a nuance that is connected with the fact that entrepreneurs can absolutely calmly, without control, without any restrictions, withdraw cash money, and personal cash is always an opportunity for further manipulations, both with tax

legislation and other areas here , it will help you deal with these, why was it profitable? that is, it is a low tax burden, that is, it is a low tax burden and, of course, this is in conditions where the current income tax is 20%, that is, we have already raised the tax, among other things. for these purposes, that is, and each considers it given, apart from those possible consequences. and on payment they, god forbid, here, as here already in our story. we showed there already in the framework of criminal cases, that is, perhaps the head responsibility of subsequent ones, that is, many are thinking. she was given the risk of creating tax manipulations, not paying extra taxes, or better, easier, plus everything. i say, everyone counts money, if there is no such tax savings, that is, there will be no incentive to implement other scheme. there is also the famous american phrase. to the billings judge anyone can arrange his affairs so that his taxes are as

low as possible, for no one is obliged to pay more than that law requires an interesting thesis, of course, here simply in my opinion. there is always a very thin line between tax manipulation and tax optimization of legitimate tax optimization. and here it is always very important to understand, because to optimize taxes. i can also through investing. i cough up the investment, directing to profit in new development acquires certain objects. that is, i , accordingly, can minimize my tax liabilities, but i'm talking about an organized business in the form of the same tax on the added value of income tax or and so on. that is, i am increasing my capitalization. that is, i become richer, but at the same time i pay less, that is, here i will say, so all over the world now this is the topic what i just said is a highly discussed topic. this is not

only characteristic of belarus or it is characteristic of everyone, because when the latest on to coloring this week was cash counting, ie according to the richest people on the planet, they pay the least in taxes. even being in america or europe, where the level of tax rates is quite high , much more than, for example, the republic of belarus, but due to which they pay less. they just pay less by investing in development, that is, they invest in development, the capitalization of the business is growing, in fact, people are getting even richer, but taxes are actually paid even less. and we have such an investment. you can, of course, our tax system. it absolutely corresponds to all the patterns that are used in the world. this statement also made me think that no one has the right to limit or the ministry of taxes and duties, but to optimize their income in the legal field frank well, we are always in

the legal field, of course, we do not optimize, we do not increase or reduce our income. that is, these are not incomes of the ministry of taxes , this is up to the state budget of the republic of belarus, and we do not leave anything for ourselves from these incomes, that is, these are all revenues that go to the budget are those possible deviations that we identify before adding and collecting the budget. it's all about the budget. and these incomes are directly in the tax service. they do not remain everything is said everything unconditionally at the final colleagues and the ministry of taxes and duties several times from the lips of speakers, including prime minister roman golovchenko. uh, the essence of the requirement of the head of state sounded. this is the prevention of excessive interference, there are no controlling and supervisory bodies of the activities of the subjects of the expansion of preventive measures. well , that is, to put it simply, control, but it will become less, and it has already become less, that is, it has been over the past 5 years,

but the level of verification activities. it has decreased, decreased by a multiple, and i even return to our conversation today, what i talked about some time ago. i said bluntly, that is, we could certainly already now. in a certain way, carpenters seeing that they, well, in our opinion, are mistaken. we want to speak precisely and we want to wish it to be so. we could check even worse now and present tax liability, but we present absolutely true, are considered absolutely true. we offer to cope and offer to understand so that they understand, that is , if they are wrong, then they must choose a different tax regime, respectively , pay other tax payments, that is, the entire work of the tax service. for the last five years, it has been precisely built on this that our priority is definitely cameral control, that is , cameral control lies in the fact that we, again, absolutely remotely without touching carpenter's activity. we analyze our information systems. and when, apparently , a certain one does not correspond, we send

a notification to the payer with a request for an offer. either give us an explanation or clarify the tax business, then we clarify these explanations, if they absolutely suit us, we have no complaints about the payment, but if they do not suit us and the payer himself voluntarily, do not specify your tax obligations further already. of course, we can move on to more serious, but tax measures, but in general, a complex of precisely control measures over the past 5 years. it has been cut from your speeches. that's for the last six months. i conclude that you yourself personally and in general the ministry is inspired by the transition to digital and by the amount of information that we have today with the tax authorities. you have emphasized this more than once. this is what you now have ways, well, without leaving, yes, from the office, what is called tracking all processes. but what is the indicator that you need to worry about the relationship already, there citizen remains the main excess of his

expenses over income. or something else absolutely right. yes, we have a lot of information resources and it is one thing to have resources. the main thing is that there are analytical tools that will allow processing this array of data, because physically due to, well, the human resource , it is often simply impossible to do this in the plot, we looked, yes, when a guy is sitting on such a pile of accounts, i don’t know how it is possible that - something to catch. well, here you need to understand in more detail, there were some conditions checks, but in general, here, specifically in this situation, we are already talking about when this is a real control verification event , that is, well, there are only a few of them , relatively speaking, that's what we are returning to, again, the previous question, that is, we have reduced this test load as much as possible, that is, all work, it behaves lytically and remotely, therefore, returning to

physical leaves, of course, we have a number of markers taken into account. the information that comes to us, which is our information resources are analyzed for these markers drop out we see a number of categories of individuals that we may be interested in one of these categories. these are those citizens who have significant expenses, but at the same time we do not see sufficient income to cover these expenses. and if this category falls into our field of vision. we are certainly starting to study this individual in more detail. again, we send him a notification, and we show the calculation where at what stages of what periods he had an excess of expenses and ask him to explain where and where there is income in order to confirm these expenses. that is, when everything is transparent, everything is often transparent, of course, of course. we have recently seriously revised our approaches, because, in

general, we have always been told a lot. it was given on the subject of what they gave me there, they gave me a loan, and so on, but again, having serious informational capabilities, we can a-a absolutely calmly remotely refute the facts, either donations or mutuals, as they fall into the field of view. uh, these individuals who have expenses exceed income. this is someone who gives you vodka, or, well, there is certainly a tip. yes, we have quite a lot of appeals from our citizens who complain, who ask there you look, i have a neighbor there, i don’t know someone else there, or you offended me somewhere there, please, i see, well , this category also falls into our category. we also analyze and study the main category. on what we are oriented last years passwords. this is definitely a business that is analyzed and prevented as well

facts of payment of wages in an envelope. that is, these are the main areas that are subject to tax control, but if we are talking about individuals, that is, again , tax control. i say, but preventive cameral control, that is, we do not go there, we do not distract enterprises. we do not pull these individuals. we analyze a legal entity, when we see the risks of hiding income, then we analyze, and the management of the owners of this person is the employees of this street, when we see that the owner, roughly speaking, in the absence income. there are cars, palaces, steamboats, relatively speaking, as i say, a reasonable question. where does all this come from when your company has it? it seems like there's nothing, and you're there, it seems like you're getting nothing. here is a reasonable question. then we begin to ask questions already to him as an individual, and at the expense of what did you buy the palace? and where did you get the money for this, my grandmother gave, and of course. yes, we accept these expenses, but we analyze

the grandmother's ability to pay, because trust me. i had to deal with the fact that grandmothers gave there so much money. i am always glad when there are such grandmothers who can give so much money, every time you told us about grandfathers, maybe there are grandfathers and grandfathers , there is everything there is a lot , we were also very popularly told that there were extremely expensive cars and cottages , they bought due to the fact that the whole summer was there, or the berries were collected. well, here we are last year there or a small taxation, that is, here is the excess amount, if they are and for some reason we just simply stopped declare here these incomes from mushrooms berries. although there was so much noise there , it dawned on the head of state that the tax service. yes, there was a tax on mushrooms and berries, although no one introduced any science. we just put a little barrier for not quite conscientious losses that tried to manipulate this topic, and

for some reason this kind of income all at once. he just simply eats. gone, but at the same time , we are not a single mushroom picker, there is nothing to impose on anyone. yes, they didn’t show a single ruble to anyone, otherwise they will save citizens unscrupulous, we must, uh, behave more modestly . well, we are always for what ah-ah, again the issue of organized business. that is, these are different categories of payers, but an organized business. it is always more transparent and in many ways people understand more and more. they want what they have, they just want to show her somewhere in some way and use all the benefits, but in order to use it. they really understand that they must conduct business transparently and pay taxes in full, because otherwise, and again i say we start with a legal entity, but end with an individual. and we have all these analytical activities. they are always held together. let's take

a moment now. let's break, after a short pause , we will return to this studio, while subscribe to our telegram channel. that's what it's called. say don't be silent. leave your comments. offer us guests, and look for all our releases on the youtube channel of belarus alone. here they are lined up, everyone has four columns on them and left machine guns to shoot belarus 24 tv channel presents a new documentary a journalistic cycle in which the story is without distortion and fiction. you will see for the first time published german documents in the military chronicle and materials of investigative cases on the crimes of the nazis against the belarusian people,

high-altitude injuries of famous settlements have been established . subjected to destruction, including together with the inhabitants and the memories of witnesses of those most tragic events at night. we're not like the ditch was. and there is a pack of such a cut of troshki, so that there is a sun lounger, which was nowhere to be seen. she there were five children, the smallest was six months about how terrible fascism is and what destruction and suffering it brings to the world in the genocide project without the right to life

, watch on belarus 24 tv channel. real conditions. this is not good. this is not bad. it's just a wonderful country. we have a wonderful state, wonderful vertical of power, but there is no ideal propaganda genius, puppeteers in that they offer us a solution to problems, which would not exist if these same puppeteers were not next to us, the problems must be solved, and not hack and hunt from their presence, a simple formula for both political and personal happiness, the author's view and they say a fool on the main events in the country and the world. do not miss the new releases of the propadanda project on belarus 24 tv channel. on the air again, say, do not be silent, and we are visiting deputy minister for

taxes and duties igor skrinnikov, who not so long ago fell into the lens of a fugitive and a telephone scammer. tried you. well, how to provoke, or something, and you gave him worthy rebuff? let's listen. home take taxes, what else should i talk to you about? igor viktorovich a year has passed, what benefit have you brought us for this one year already? lovnoe i don’t remember according to the news, it was not completed there. how much you have already been given somewhere, probably. igor viktorovich ah i think this is a worthy reaction, of course, he did not expect such a rebuff, but it sounds sobering for the fugitives. return to the country and pay taxes, but it seems to me that this is

the behavior of this blogger. in general, his reaction says that they feel some of their inaccessibility, or what? well, firstly, both he and his wife are such rather entertaining characters. eh, this is not our first communication with him and with his property. well, he does not only call me, that is, they live, you correctly described. here, in many ways, somewhere, some kind of telephone scammer, relatively speaking, he, well, who is calling, but it is clear that they need to somehow exist. and i’ll probably even say more, probably try to survive, because where they are now to a large extent. i'm sure, probably, that nobody needs them. that's all, therefore , right here on this hype, they are trying some. restrain interest in his wife, the last time i called. she finally, in general, already told me, she says, you are manipulating me. i say yes as you imagine. i say, you

called me and i say. you were trying something. i say, but the main thing, in fact , is just that i have something to discuss with them, and they and he and she are tax debtors. they must in budget of the country. they say, this is not our country. i say, and even then call at all if this is not your country, well, i say, well, now you are a legal citizen of the republic of belarus. you have not fulfilled your tax obligations. for now, singing is credited daily, and you have to go back and pay your taxes, that's the basic premise i've been trying to convey to him and her. and then it's, well, no more than it's legal for all hell. that is, or there are, or who paid and i’ll say everything normally, so we didn’t do it, of course, special. samples we don't specifically analyzed these fugitives, that is, well, i will say, so that separate debtors certainly take place, and they must pay the country's budget tax payments, while

their physical presence. at the same time, it is a must. well, they can fulfill their tax obligations without being physically present. quite right. they can fulfill their tax obligations and remotely another point, that ah, returning to these idiotic comrades. they say. and tell me how much i say, but i can’t say how much i don't know, on the other end of the line. it wouldn't be you, basically. yes, no, it’s just from them that i know how much they owe another moment. i say , you want to know, i say come to me, he will tell and show everything, they know exactly what they wanted to know, and where our taxes are spent. i say, i say well, come, i say, i will tell you everything, where our taxes are spent. for some reason they don't want to go strange, they want to say how much we owe. i say, well, i can't tell you either. there. where we are directing you, you are trying in every possible way to ignore. here is this information do not

get this information. now say yes, tell me how much i owe. i say, come, i will certainly discourage you this arrogance. i just can't imagine. that's what 's going on in the minds of people who call in return for a tax collector punishing not even a single case, that is, they are confident in their actual impunity. they think that e bloody regime will not reach them, their hands will not reach. here, well, it's hard to say. this is probably not quite the sphere of competence of the tax authorities , of course. for us. they must go we are taking all legal steps to meet our tax obligations and of course these tax obligations. they will and why let us, if here we hear the case back. uh, there in the same united states and you are a debtor yes, not non-payment of taxes there, you didn’t pay extra, he is put on the wanted list, criminal prosecution, and so on and so forth, and even from other countries they are returned to their homeland

by force. we have such no such practice exists. that practice was it and there is another point that we are now with a number of countries, this one, including tax interaction, including, probably, in terms of law enforcement . it is not as constructive as we all would like, that's all, but these again, an odious personality, they are presented as some kind of political refugees. although they are nothing more than absolutely simple scammers. well, we found out today that there are other approaches to taxation and little entrepreneurship. in general, the transition to number. this is a system. you hope it will be objective, fair, and to a greater extent will reflect a fair competition. tax yes between subjects, but i would like to know that you have already warned us in advance. what other transformations are envisaged in your department for the near future? hmm

, first of all, all the work that is being carried out and built in the tax service is the provision of electronic services for our payers. starting this year, we have launched a test mode for payers of a simplified taxation system. we ourselves for these payers we keep records of income. this is simplified. i say, we ourselves calculate tax liabilities and payments by analyzing what they presented to him, if everything corresponds, and he absolutely agrees with this , and he only has to conditionally sign a tax return and fulfill tax obligations. that is, the creation of these services here is our main work. and our main task, which we will implement in the future , is to improve the numbers. so absolutely the interaction of the app. already even released, yes. with the truth - it certainly is. yes, because professional income, otherwise we have it only on a digital application, no physical interaction is carried out here. now here's what i said about, the last one is the classic taxes under

the simplified taxation system. this is a small business. these are our legal entities , taking into account the fact that the ip is no longer applicable, that is, for this category we launched a test platform, which we will run around and watch during this year. what roughnesses are possible to refine unconditionally together with the business hear their proposals so that in the future it becomes the most effective system remotely, again, the interaction of the tax payer. that is, again, i repeat, in fact. for the bad guy, we will calculate all his income and calculate the amount of tax that supports you to pay from these incomes. thank you for visiting us today. thanks e. we paid attention to this certainly important issue. let your website develop and the tax office in our system. dedication we tatyana shcherbina victoria popova say goodbye to you today, goodbye. goodbye. and now igor skrinnikov is speaking, dear payers. the purpose of our meetings uh, the goal is for us

to convey those messages in connection with which the tax legislation has been changed and adjusted, the tax service has always been open and remains open. we are always ready to help tell and explain, as well as dragging words that appear in tax legislation. live wisely. work hard now. culture history architecture everyone has it collected by the water project in the nineteenth century. uh, in the role of a man, of course,

golovany jumpers didn’t leave everything in the yard of geese-beauties about love for hormones, and she is especially the number one acceleration of this legend to the hetalandian details to the elite. they have been toiling about it for hundreds of years, and today the most bodai, chiseled and rare for the belarusian speech of storkness is potatoes on the central resolite of the design of the wife of the design. on top of the ravana of belarus

on our tv channel. in this issue the president of belarus