and the very meaning of the olympic games is already lost, if the whole world is going, then let's gather the whole world, well, to sweep the whole team, but this is not right. what messages from the past are found today in belarusian shrines? there is the rest of the name, a few letters and a scythe, dashes next to it, as if someone was counting something for a certain period of time, most likely, someone

gave himself a magpie like that. we tell children how spiritual education begins. about god, i spend quite a lot of time so that the children know exactly what divine love how children communicate with each other. what is prosphora and how is it prepared in monasteries ? crossworks. you yourself from this test will turn out somewhere in five liturgies of large prosphora, specially liturgical ones, and somewhere around 120 small open spaces, which distinguishes and unites the main religions of the world. of course, it is very important for us that we offer a spiritual foundation, every religion does this. e hmm, given their traditions and

rules. but in many ways, we have a common approach, a look at the family, answers to these and other questions in the spiritual educational projects on belarus 24 tv channel

. together with our guides, you will learn something that you would never have guessed to google, one of the most famous names of the belaya vezha tower, although for its history of white. she never was. by the way, who didn’t know this tower is depicted on the five-ruble banknote of the legend, historical facts and many unusual sights when an arrow or a spear gets here. they slide off

change, direction, and so on, with reliable protection there are many curious and legendary characters. this year , watch on belarus 24 tv channel

. hello, on the air, the program sas is authorized to announce that i am the host nadezhda sas i remind you. this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening in the world and understand how these processes, events, people will affect the life of everyone and the life of the country. negotiations between the president in belarus and russia, alexander lukashenko, and vladimir putin, the head of the states discussed issues

of further development of belarusian-russian relations, as well as integration cooperation within the framework of the union state alexander lukashenko said at the talks that the union programs with russia, of which there are 28 in total, have already been completed by 80%. we are deepening. what are we doing in order to, well, somehow overcome the barriers that are artificially created for us. i do not mentally say food. we have ensured labor safety does not say that people should be dressed. we are it done. e in all directions, therefore , we will have decent positive changes, what can i say to the people of belarus and russia in the highest state, i want to note that, and the trade turnover is growing, it has reached a record level. yes, last year over, 43 billion dollars. in dollar terms and what is most important and what makes me very happy is that we are expanding here, and so, in principle, this work was well organized, but

opportunities in the field of cooperation are being addressed, primarily industrial cooperation. hungarian foreign minister peter sijarta made an unexpected visit to minsk to discuss according to him, the official budapest of all the eu countries takes the most constructive position on the peaceful solution of the conflict in ukraine , consistently refusing to transfer weapons to ukraine and insisting on the priority of diplomacy following the results of negotiations from the yart, a program of cooperation between foreign countries was signed with the leadership of the foreign ministry. political departments of belarus and hungary for 2023. president of the republic of belarus alexander lukashenko met with representatives of foreign and belarusian media in minsk to meet foreign journalists from austria azerbaijan great britain qatar russia saudi arabia usa france japan, the head of state answered the most pressing questions regarding the conflict in ukraine and

the position of the parties to the war and peace of belarus' reaction to the developing situation, and also made a resonant proposal. why is python moving? you pass poland to him there through your channels, we are ready to accept him in minsk and have a serious talk if he wants peace in ukraine and even putin will fly up in minsk see you. here, the three of us are two aggressors and a peace-loving president. why not for the sake of ending the war. now, if he wants to end the war? i’m manually flying the three of us, i guarantee you that vladimir vladimirovich putin will come here, the three of us will sit down and solve the whole problem, all problems have been solved here , i can convince putin of something. we will now

announce around the world that the president of belarus invites him to belarus in brussels , another meeting of defense ministers of the western coalition, which provides military support to the zelensky regime, took place head of the pentagon catches austin promised to provide kiev with everything necessary for a large-scale offensive this spring. at the same time , some promises to provide combat aircraft. what the ukrainian government insists on was not mentioned. in the united states , ball hysteria continues to develop ; three more unidentified flying objects were shot down over north america in a week. this time , the pentagon did not blame china, there was even a version that we are talking about extraterrestrial aircraft, however, soon, junior partners refuted by the white house usa romania and ukraine, in order to keep up with

the sovereign, also announced the appearance of unidentified balloons in the airspace. well, in the information war, the one who tells the truth always loses, he is limited by the truth, a liar, can carry anything he said, american science fiction writer, robert sheckley today we will talk about information wars and their impact on journalism, society and international relations and explore this very interesting topic. a political scientist will help me. vadim borovik. and vladimir konstantinovich mamontov, general director of radio, says, moscow, director of the smart internet foundation, by tradition, we begin our program with blitz millet. and, of course, in your opinion. is there a place for objectivity in the era of post- truth and the predominance of social networks? you know, there is a place, nevertheless , definitely. eat. just. uh, this place

needs to be conquered. it just needs to be recaptured today, and e. hmm, uh, all sorts of punishments can fall on you, but in general, you don’t have to be for the truth, if you already got down to business in journalism, the real one still exists, no matter how we don’t eradicate it from life, but it is, i immediately remember a brilliant quote from the movie what is the strength of the brother, the strength is in the truth. this is probably the main main challenge for my colleagues, the information front. today should not fall solely on the creation of fakes , the manipulation of propaganda, we bring your answer , i am not a supporter of idealism, but nevertheless, in general, build a national or international policy on lies and fakes. it's always a vulnerability, because sooner or later it exposed and served trust therefore therefore should be the basis. true, national interests should be the basis, but it is completely naivety that we are telling

the truth and revealing all the cards. this, of course, can't. to take place in today's reality, well, the basis of the basis must be the truth, you are the guru of journalism. it seems to me a person who thoroughly understands this incredible interesting area. and the sphere of mediacracy. here, in your opinion, the emergence of social networks has perverted journalism, because there are opinions that today every blogger is already a journalist. each leader of public opinions is already a journalist and objectivity has faded into the background , exclusively subjective whips. and also, if supported by a rude word of publication. here they really capture the masses. well, you know, let's start with the fact that the world has changed very much and the media environment itself. it has also changed in that journalism, when we say good quality journalism. we can imagine anything. you know, i am like that in the form of dusty newspapers of some binders

or something else people, come to your senses, keep in mind this never and will never happen again. e. that same objective journalism is true, journalism new journalism will look sometimes. it's like blogging, sometimes not. in short, we may not recognize it. in fact. she is definitely making her way. she definitely. uh, it cannot be said that this is some kind of perversion in the great matrix, which was there once we were there or the masters, as they put it. yes, or there guru of all sorts of pawned you go listen when we did our projects. being very young journalists, elderly journalists told us how we perverted everything. and now the time has come. and now we, it turns out , are called, it means people who, it means, they did it, they did it. and hmm, here we started with the truth, and here, in fact

, it should continue. this is the most important thing, and what has become more difficult is that everyone can express their piece of truth. here is the mosaic. this is a new one. not everyone understood it. it is necessary to work with this. this is a completely new reality, which is now such journalism. that's all, the old one will not. well well, now i would like to draw attention to the definition, information warfare is purposeful actions to achieve political, economic, military or other goals of a strategic level and is carried out by disseminating specially selected and prepared information that, in a necessary way, affects the civilian population of the authorities and the armed forces opposing the country about the information iron curtain of modernity. more details in our story. on february 27, at the beginning of russia’s special military operation in ukraine, the european union declared

about the intention to ban the broadcasting of russian media on its territory, it took only 2 days to discuss such a global issue, and already on march 2 it was officially announced that the broadcast and distribution of the content of the russian media sputnik and arti in europe was officially announced from that moment on in the uk germany france and spain a. also, the satellite on the territory of all countries of the union lost access to its european audience. and these are several tens of millions of people who commented on their decision in brussels rather ambiguous european policy. they covered themselves with such concepts as democracy and freedom of speech, and the russian ban itself. the media is the defense of these principles, by doing this we are not attacking freedom of speech, but protecting freedom of speech, but i have a feeling today that we are not doing enough. we need to go. first you need to understand how these. the companies were organized to identify the actors of the sources of dissemination the european union in this matter should act more ambitiously, strengthening

its resilience. however, with this attitude european authorities. do not agree. even local journalists, in their opinion, the very decision to ban russian broadcasting. the media looks pretty controversial because. it violates human rights. generally. not to mention the right to freedom of speech and to receive information, and in the end it looks not like protecting the european union, but like an attempt to suppress any freedom of thought in the country , the problem is that this decision was made and implemented by governments, but in principle, european legislation does not give the government the right to ban the media, including propaganda in liberal democracies , the right to allow broadcasting or cancel it is exercised by independent bodies and independent regulators. such comments are not paid attention in the european union; the course has not been changed, therefore, over time, pressure on russia has increased and in may last year, moscow was forced to pass a law on the project of mirror response worlds. now the local

prosecutor's office can deprive foreign licenses, and their journalists will also be prohibited from distributing information materials of these publications or broadcasters in russia, at the same time, according to the editor-in-chief of the media group, russia today and the rt channel and margarita simonyan , not a single employee will be laid off in any country. and despite all the bans, the russian media will continue their work. even contrary to the wishes of brussels, we bypassed and will bypass as we do. i will not say as long as the interests of our motherland require us to do such work. we will do this , the belarusian media turned out to be objectionable, and the belarus 24 tv channel was disconnected from satellite broadcasting in the countries of the european union and the pacific region. although even before the ban, the coverage area of ​​the belarusian international tv channel.

broadcasting covered 174 countries belarus 24 banned and in ukraine such a decision was made by the national council of the country, the minister of information of belarus vladimir pervtsov noted that when something objectionable is immediately closed, journalists are subjected to repression the media are closed, but this is not the first fact and not the last, how they really are, when it is unprofitable for them, they simply crack down on the worthless objectionable media, how they close the accounts of politicians, how are they uh? well, let's say they introduce into a digital flask those who are not pleasing to them, but we have all observed this. this is another one. er, fact, this is another proof that there is no liberal high- standard democratic politics. no. well, media expert denis zharkikh denis joins our broadcast i thought you heard the content of our story together with us. how do you generally feel about such braids in the media, no matter what motivates it. the main thing is that today

extremely nervous and emotional for all participants in the world process of time , this information iron is being built. well, i think, good afternoon, i think that when the information hmm actually war ends, or rather, let's say, information contact between the warring parties, then it begins. ah, the hot war. that is, there is no other way. that is , when people are still able to speak, they are no less inclined to grab weapons. this is probably the most important thing, and when the european union is there these euro officials, they say, here we are defending some kind of freedom of speech. yes, no freedom of speech. you are not defending, you are translating, and this is very clearly visible to others. and actually a question. you translate,

you burn the conflict even more. you drive him even more into, let's say, such a confrontational phase, and what does this lead to ? only to one to the loss of life to the destruction of houses to and to further. in general. uh, an increase in hmm actually the area of ​​war denis a. tell me, is there an opinion that in the current conditions, success in information war requires maximum brightness, speed , rigidity of response. and now, many people even say that the zelensky regime is allegedly allowed to regularly outplay russia in this field , precisely because they are thinking not about long-term reputation, but about momentary hype. here you personally agree that in such conditions serious world players. the same as the same russian federation, china , which, in the information support

of foreign policy, is aimed at avoiding scandal, is doomed to look faded against the background of such as the current ukraine, you understand the whole question whom does it affect if we are dealing? let's say with professional consumers, but we are talking. in general, this is a consumer society. it came to us, then, of course, a bright wrapper will act on them. there's something else, which means some sensational things. but it's all like a system of manipulation, firstly, information wars. they precede the hot phase of the war and accompany the war and then continue, therefore it is absolutely wrong that the information war ends with the beginning of the hot phase. no, accompanies and enhances second. here you are talking about brightness. yes , our russian partners had enough brightness and enough. we have a lot of bright ones. uh, let's say people on television. well, this cannot be denied, and the resonance does not come out very well sometimes

and they go too far, and especially on the eve. from the fourteenth year they went so far that i was already sure that no one in kiev would ever meet with flowers. it was a mistake. they worked incorrectly with belarus , they worked incorrectly with ukraine, this is my opinion. here is ah. well i don't mean all the many worked correctly and thank god today, within the framework of the union state , it works very correctly. and today we show how it was necessary to work until there was no such military operation, second. i want to finish. what is the problem is not in the brightness, the problem is in the control of information platforms. that's the problem. you must see the root of the problem. uh, they closed it there or they closed russia today or they closed the russian channels there is youtube, but you accustomed the user to youtube without developing your own stream. you transferred a user from yandex to google there they are engaged not only in the consumption of information, but also in business today, which provide information about

russian pessimism and reduce views. well, again kana which e broadcast a different point of view artificially inflate the view turns into recommendations in this way manipulates consumption. you see, agree that, again, such closures, the same rush there, is a manifestation of the weakness of western society, because it was a professional platform that performed its work professionally. yes you know i i disagree with my colleague when he says that we did everything wrong. we so on. well, everything, not everything, okay, look , by and large, what we wanted, including russia and belarus, i think, in fact, we wanted to live together and peacefully. we wanted a huge wonderful economic political human continent from lisbon to vladivostok, that's what we offered them. here's where to start. that's why you built arteries, they were to be pinched and so on and so on margarita simonyan is generally an excellent journalist.

and the fact that she is now engaged in the information war - she could not have dealt with it, she would be brilliant, she would have been engaged in the information world, information friendship and so on, so we wanted a completely different swindler, such as a barrel, the barrel was the smallest, if you are from this all bullshit, yes. big swindlers never wanted this, in general, it turns out that in the fourteenth year they concluded the minsk agreements in order to mean pessimizing not in order to pessimize me what kind of visitor today yes, no google in order to win in advance in the world's huge world battle to advance and turn ukraine, which we wanted, not at all. believe me, not a single person in belarus or in russia wanted this. that's how to fight this tragedy the president said, vladimir putin is a tragedy, in fact. eh, no one wanted this tragedy. therefore, if we from the very beginning it was somehow different with figs

in our pockets with lies and all sorts of nonsense , this current one, which. unfortunately, now we have enough everywhere as at least right. we you they began to work differently. we worked. wait, wait, then, wait , look, if we if we didn't do it this way from the very beginning. you know, but what if i would do it with my conscience, what would i do with my concept of life about the truth about everything else , you know this is also capital, which is, of course, oil. it's expensive and so on. and this is the feeling of being right. which is helping today. in this difficult in a difficult history in the tragedy, only the feeling of rightness helps the russians to endure what is happening. this is a special operation when pushed and brought down in battle by and large, no one needs, including europeans, only possibly americans.

yes, and even then, some kind of hour yes, two really beautiful peoples of peaceful peaceful slavic great happiness that , for many reasons that can still be conveyed, make belarus so they didn’t drag yours into a conflict with russia, which was like this here, between other than that, well, that's a fact. all this multi-vector so -called collapsed, years of trials and glory came, god is absolutely dear to absolutely means, uh. thank you for recognizing the great. no, you didn't argue. we know that you are here. i will not admit anything here that i said, it was really. no, let's not get nervous. thank you first, when we talk to you, a normal joke does not make the operation calmly

carried out in cold blood. yes, we wanted exactly what we wanted. we will share with you now. let's do what we wanted correctly , absolutely agree with the message you wanted to say about this. i wanted to confirm the words of putin who confirmed from lisbon the far east was. and you tell the prosecutor not the prosecutor, but your lawyer opinions, well, it goes on like good, but methods, and trade wars. naked wars before each new year, she is the vice-premier, who could not understand for the reception, we did not know the price of gas. this is the correct behavior within the framework of the union state is a shame. when you come to us here with your calculators. you show centripetal forces within the framework of a union state, or you have disgraced yourself, thank god that today we are setting an example. it is necessary to trade, how to stand back to back during a military conflict, how to be a friend to support a friend in the foreign policy arena and the position was normal, any partner is interested in a strong ally. and if we could get $18 billion in the west,

that's good. we could buy more of your products, you can also say better products to you, so there is no need to talk nonsense and it will be good if the union state has trading partners in all parts of the world, but today we overpay with an intermediary. today. we are forced to have discounts of 30-40% for oil products and gas. today we have to lose billions of dollars. today, the russian budget to lose due to illiterate policy. and firstly, any strong state demonstrates strength and is not forced to get involved in a war. the beginning of the war. this is already a defeat. this must be understood, so let's take a cold shower , stop throwing hats. listen, smart and wise people, of course, and i'm not talking about myself. i'm talking about those who don't come with a calculator all the time in order to show that he is the greatest. the strongest partners are always equal. yes, there are such friends, and such lawyers, then enemies are not needed and protected. i want it myself. by the way, to any of your loud,

clearly stated questions, yes or constant and whatever you want or laminations and anything, i can absolutely calmly answer you. if in our conversation between the two countries you do not understand why are we motivating ours? difficult relationships, why they were difficult, and we will not understand yours. you see, we came to an understanding. they are nowhere. we didn’t come with you, we won’t come to an understanding, because bawlers who are looking for momentary profit on any platform. quickly her scream. as loudly as possible, without understanding and without going into the fact that in fact the problems were much more complicated, and they don’t need to talk about it so completely, unlike some. i heard

alexander grigoryevich lukashenko speak about this frankly and with great pain, your president and we are not the last person. in general , he is very, very close to us, and you know something of this gorlopansky and this lack of understanding of russian realities. i didn’t notice something from him, why is she from? she is the suddenness of the future and it's deep there. over there there is a deep understanding. why came with calculators. yes, because it is oil and money, by the way, therefore, from a calculator, and what else to come with, did belarus sit at these negotiations with a calculator without a calculator? for example, i have always taken it calmly and positively. and why shouldn't we talk about each other talking about our mutual peace there were times of another thing, that the correct behavior of peaceful times provoked a war, you know? i'm telling you about the mistakes that led. you started our actions? well enjoy to say or is it

useless? why? no, you said absolutely everything. then i called you a bawler in peacetime, you need to sit out of a calculator in peacetime, but you have to keep in mind that how the forces that are enemies of us and belarus look at it , we have our own fights here. and at this time, other people are much more natural to use it and so on. here is this thing. we must also remember. one point very designation of the problem is not enemy position. you must understand this if you will constantly. and we're on this battlefield turn off the prosecutor. yes dear

, turn it off. turn it off. please. let's hear the opinion on the topic of our today's program of the president of the republic of belarus aleksandrovna. this is the authority that people who follow the news need to understand. not always able to separate truth from lies when they are a real participant in the events. and you get a huge amount of information in the form of lies and fakes , it is really difficult to separate the truth from the lies. in the west, politics, in principle, has long been turned into a staged movie, people were accustomed to this format of presenting information, so the truth is sometimes uninteresting. here , in fact, denis, a heated discussion, very wise words

were heard from the mouth of the president of the republic of belarus. now, if in today's conditions it makes sense to fight for the truth, if it has been replaced by narratives that imply that everyone has their own truth and the one who has it looks more convincing is stronger, even if it comes down to manipulations and simplifications, when it’s already war, then propaganda goes directly, when propaganda and propaganda is directed exclusively at supporters, and it is not directed at people who are on the other side, those people who are declared on the other side, as a rule, not people, as a rule. i don't always speak like pro nose from the point of view. e, means already military propaganda. uh, as a rule, people there who die on the other side, they obya. they blew themselves up there, they shoot themselves. we see it very well, therefore, in this regard

, it’s just, understandable, and therefore, i would very, uh, i would suggest e in further discussion, firstly, listen to the presenter. uh, because in fact, it is the presenter who should lead. eh, and not immediately try to yell at someone right away, but from the point of view of what you need to defend your truth. i think that it is necessary not only to lag behind one's own truth, because, well, now they have seen that a person has his own truth. here he does not allow others to defend. well, you need to understand, what is the truth of the other and really. here is what a colleague said very well. don't include the prosecutor. thank you come here. dim i want you reacted. i want to say that there is no need to be nervous again. this is a manipulator, please, what is an increase gentlemen - this is one way to manipulate the discussion. am i talking to you about techniques right? and that's what we need to understand. i'm not talking about the fact that russia took the wrong position in terms of approach and the approach was absolutely correct,

because the control of eurasia the union of eurasia the union of german german capital, asian capital and russian capital was generally a powerful country, but a powerful region trade economic, but they deceived us on our, so to speak, open arms and capable of cooperation. they told us lies. well, the question is different. we, having, for example, a union state, often demonstrated inability to negotiate, without creating a centripetal force within this entity, somewhere we, working with ukraine, i think we went too far on the eve of the same events with the rhetoric that was directed at the population and somewhere escalated the situation by creating not, let's say, not friendly to us forces within the country. they created the russian special services worked and created these sectors and everything else was there, but there were also a few. i mean, information channels. even we in belarus have formed such an opinion that they overdo it a little bit.

and today we must understand with you, here are all sorts of vulnerabilities, that today the collective launch controls the main information platforms, that they absolutely unreasonably restrict the broadcasting of our channels, we must do some work, even including correcting errors and working more effective in order to defeat my goal is our common victory, and not my goal is to somehow offend my russian friends partner. well, what are we talking about the information war, the war of the 21st century right now with the guests in the studio, there is an opportunity to hear an exclusive commentary from alexander malkevich, a russian journalist, tv presenter general director of the tv channel, st. petersburg, who is right now on the front line alexander hello, a special operation has changed a lot in russia including in the system of relations the power of society, and before it was difficult to imagine that officials would quickly

respond to the publications of the same bloggers or publications of the leading telegram channels. and now that is exactly what is happening. do you have the feeling that state propaganda, which has shown its ineffectiveness against the propaganda machine from the west and ukraine , is being replaced by strong patriotic journalism. what does russia benefit from in the end? you know , it's often said that there were surgeries to come up with. because a number of processes are running useful to our countries for our culture and of course, for our traces of information, so yeah patriotic journalism was always just uh, it wasn't trendy. unfortunately, now the trends have changed, but as for

the reaction to the publications of bloggers. um, in general, this is standard practice in our country. mm. the so-called incident management and the ability to respond to it. uh, so here i would take one heap would not interfere with us, really, the authorities are learning to respond quickly to those risks to those threats that, uh, come from the network. a patriotic journalism - it's still a little different, but, but the demand for it, the demand for uh, is also front-line poetry. well, actually she called. this is real, yes , high-class, high-level citizen journalism. she is really in demand and very cool. what? its time has come, what do you see as the secret of the success

of mr. zelensky’s propaganda machine, why the majority of ukrainians have not been able to take a more balanced objective look at the causes of the war and its course of ukrainian propaganda for a year. it's my favorite question, and he is such enough. the answer will be voluminous. so, first of all, hmm talented performers, well, let 's express this, maybe it's for here they are popular things, but it's true and podlyako and arrestovich. and these are people who know how to work. uh, with the media they know how to work for the camera quarter 95. they are, after all. uh, all of their resources are refocused on creation. mm obscene sketches of various performances of the show there, that is, everything for the front. everything for victory in this case, they have it all of sufficient quality , plus, uh, there is, a certain freedom creativity, so strong speakers

creative ideas scenario finds. it's true. this is the second time. e, the most severe cleansing, something that e we have repeatedly talked about, but we had a passage yard, and still have something to say. the situation has more or less improved. uh, so, well, imagine, here's one side. you have a cleared information field. there is only one opinion one endless this all-out telethon across all channels. uh oh, so to speak, we won e and talented speakers, bright, speakers are good screenwriters. eh, that's all there is. well, here it is. uh, in this totality, the totality of such an offensive. well, the key to some success in terms of zombies. yes, because, well, normal. a citizen of ukraine turns on, so to speak, e

switches channels and how they are known anecdote. i'm just switching to you now, just everywhere the same thing and completely e in such a super concentrated form. hmm, nonsense is heard. and about the fact that yes, these grandma knocked down a jar of cucumbers. drone grandfather shot down the plane, but in such large numbers. eh, well, it's already working. you know, no matter how difficult a thing is to dispute, it means, well, if every person tells you about it, well, you involuntarily think about it, maybe this is the way it really is, therefore. the component of success is like this, and we should, in addition to the truth, also learn how to present this truth in an interesting way, brightly tasty with

a sense of humor with irony itself. eh, it didn't always work. that is on our side. true, this is our main weapon, but hmm, this is a discordant opinion and not a very good one, because strictly speaking, uh there were facts that coulters were introduced , including into a patriotic environment, and through this they also rocked the situation or tried to rock it. therefore , professionally trained people fought with us according to the high canons of the information war. and we often did. it is not that the handicraftsman is now amateur performance. yes, uh, the initiative of bloggers of the patriots is there, uh, military correspondents, eh. well , we still lack, let's say, a rigid system, but we, of course, learn from our

mistakes. i just wish it was faster. thank you very much, let's continue our conversation. many say these propagandists. and such and such tv channels need to be closed and these ones should be reined in. there is a line between a propagandist and a warrior of the information front. it, in my opinion, lies here, where a person is now, here he is, he is here, if he is a war correspondent, then here he is at war now and he tries to write the truth, e, to penetrate where each other does not penetrate e to reveal such, uh, such genuine springs and mechanisms of war there, which, apart from him, no one and no one by chance, our president vladimir vladimirovich putin had such a moment when he listened and listened to all his superiors. there, then, subordinates and so on. who's there? he has a military unit, and then he says, come on, guys, war correspondents,

they will come to me, and i will talk to them and listen to them. but tell me, please, can a journalist be a patriot, because patriotism is first and foremost. oh, and you , as a citizen, do not need this patriots. this is such an outstanding category, which she is in you. and he doesn’t turn off other positive professional human qualities, but again, look patriot that i don’t see that we have a lot of shortcomings, but at the same time, but at the same time i am a patriot and at the same time this is the main thing - this is such a story. this is a farvator. yes, that's it , it's okay to be a professional and a patriot. this is right. now it broke out in the west, when from the lips of a journalist who has a very respected hersh power award,

information appeared about how nord stream 2 was blown up. a wave of hatred hit him from his own fellow citizens and the only reason is that you know there is such a principle mike kantz damage in the west, my country is bad or good proven or right. and that's exactly what this is about. that is, he was jammed because he suddenly became not a patriot. although in my opinion. this is just an indicator of patriotism - this is the condemnation of illegal or legal illegal actions of your state. this is a good wish for him. it seems to me vadim how do you think we will be objective, and at home we want from our fellow citizens. uh, more support. national interests, and often often, sometimes we try to retouch some issues and outline some more clearly. this is true, but the question is why which mass media should be trusted by those who are able to bear responsibility for what was said, because the publication

is registered, there is a chief editor , there are corresponding journalists, there is the ministry of information, and in case it is proved that that they disseminate this or that false information will be directly liable when the person somewhere abroad. it is already dependent, perhaps on foreign intelligence services, perhaps simply depending on the economic dependence of one or another oligarch , respond to such media platforms as youtube, but his mother does not close it, his information may be worn. uh, not even just uh, his personal judgment. yes, but it may be imposed. uh, a third -party judgment, this must be understood, therefore , those media outlets that are forced to work with national interests cause more confidence. first line of national interests. no need to be afraid. what do you mean where? listen? once again , the truth cannot be discussed. if today you are ready to tell the truth, sometimes to the population according to some economic experts. you will line up people in the exchange offices to tell the truth with you

, e . in the country and the same people, but the policy should be based on the truth, the policy should be based on national interests. you understand about this. this must be understood there is truth at the core, that is, at the core of what the president does, a works to ultimately raise the standard of living, but already work with information. it must be first of all, effective and such restrictions. that's exactly about it. now i want to talk with you in more detail, the main tool of information warfare is visual influence and manipulation, and the most terrible thing. there are no outright lies in modern wars. the main task of state departments for information security is to prevent its spread in modern wars the transition from the geopolitics of the buttons of politics to work with images and meanings has intensified, and through the mass media, societies form positive or negative

attitudes towards the foreign and domestic policy of the state, the image of ideas and propaganda. moral values, in other words, create a positive or negative brand of the country, and now i want to draw your attention to a fragment of the film, which shows very well how public opinion is manipulated. now there is an information war for each of you, is it news, each of which is a potential bomb. wait, it's unbelievable, got the news in the last topic, we'll change it. let's watch. so, the city of volzhsk , an accident at a thermal power plant, one person died two blocks without electricity, he was just lucky about the chic news. well, what does this news from a small town have to do with a political agenda. look, i’m explaining on my fingers two blocks without electricity, one person died, we’re calling the local administration that we’re there . they just tell me. well, in order not to take responsibility, we take it. this is a moo, let's go to

any civil activist. what kind of relationship does any civil activist have with any local administration, well, about like a cat and a dog. absolutely true, and therefore this civil activist will tell you with great pleasure out of a ninety-nine percent guarantee that everything is bad with this administration and roads and schools. and in general, it’s strange how this, the city of volzhsky is still worth the governor , it’s not all going to c grade yet, we go to our friend engineer and ask him, mr. engineer, but we know you something. about the accident at the volzhskaya tpp well, of course, he doesn't know anything, and we have information, mr. engineer, that this accident could have happened due to some kind of breakdown, and the gearbox has broken down. here we have a question. can the gearbox cause an accident, of course, it can, the engineer says, and we also know, mr. engineer, that these gearboxes are swedish-made. and,

perhaps now, under the conditions of sanctions in russia , when any deliveries are prohibited , you can find these swedish gearboxes somewhere. well, in general for he was answered. we go further, call the relevant ministry and ask questions. how do you feel about the problem of supplying swedish gearboxes under sanctions, subject to problems, any official hangs up, well done, but we inquisitive guys go even further and call the minister himself with the question of how quickly import substitution will replace these veteran gearboxes for us. they just stop answering the chic finale, but in the finale we go to any more or less well-known human rights activist to comment on the words of the minister. what is the answer to us? what's the type, what do you want from ministers president putin president putin

what do we have as a result, the headline is a catastrophe volga putin's minister turned a blind eye to the death of a man, volzhsky well , as soon as we explain that the culprit of all the bad news , this becomes an emotional background. well, here it is. it seems to me that the moment of creating things that capture the masses is most clearly shown. it becomes easier to manipulate society, especially when there are such skillful guys, media experts. denis do not want you all the same a rude phrase, how to resist this is important. uh first, don't litter yourself

too much unnecessary consumption of information. this is harmful, like overeating oversleeping in moderation, the second is to choose those sources, the average of which was confirmed by specific events over a long period of time, and vice versa, cut off the sources. eh, if you saw that stuffing came from one or another information channel, we often see that tomorrow they will start bombing from somewhere or tomorrow. uh. so, they told the russians , you urgently leave the country on such and such a date , the second wave will begin, the third wave mobilization, or there, will soon close the borders of these sources. you've been told this eight or nine times already. why would you want this channel? by the way, an example not so long ago, i was in the european parliament, came to the enemy platform , arranged such a discussion, many more were looking for a long time, so you know what they told me, huh?

the meps, with a balanced, balanced point of view, say, nadia, we read the russian media because this is the only way to collect information from various sources. what are you talking about, you can make your own picture. and then the person understands that he makes the decision vladimir first, you are right. these are, uh, normal people. they, uh, instinctively or from their experience, they will make their way through some kind of, well, balanced factory knowledge. similar to the truth, if only because everything that we have seen now in this film, you know, is necessary for this girl, who listens to him with her mouth open. this is a journalist. the one that this editor-in-chief is on salary for her. god knows what department? yes, it is clear, or rather, in what? yes, he, firstly, she needs to be told listen ask him a simple question. how much do you get paid for this, so that you build

such concept schemes? why are you spending them great here. why are you so frightened that putin is such a terrible enemy for a long time that it happened to you and these are the questions that could be given to these young girls and my boys who work well. by the way, the diagram is shown absolutely normally. yes hmm these are the questions. uh, throwing them there. we, this, too, applies to hygiene information, we are like once at the forefront of the fight against this european swamp, which has long turned into what we are the only thing we hmm we can do. maybe, i don’t know this old woman, already quite weak europe can be pulled out of this flame in time. from this swamp. yes , drag it somewhere. uh, moscow suburbs to a sanatorium, so that it comes to its senses a little. well, they are, by the way, otherwise here's another highlight. hey sportsman. he will never take, for example, the height of a jump, if he did not psychologically imagine that one of

the ways of manipulation. nations by peoples - this is convince the people of their own failure. all of you are incapable of anything, you need people from the third rome who will come and teach you, so to speak , to manage these complex mechanisms, so it is very important to keep and faith in your own strength. you know what else i would like to discuss with you. so we understand that, probably, the first president of the virtual era is vladimir zelensky, and the virtual mediacracy is more detailed. i’ll tell you right now, because at the end of june, representatives of british computer graphics studios tale smith garden susie overcoste and others came to kiev to make a 3d hologram for the president of ukraine and here it is in the form of this hologram. zelenskiy addressed european leaders at the event. fandrish forum landon, 2022 and it looked extremely realistic, broadcasting the address of president zelensky using a 3d avatar hologram

. the creators of this avatar said that they smoked to demonstrate innovations that changed the world, and then zelensky's holographic capsule visited, except for london and stockholm and paris. so, are we getting close? to the fact that even the presidents of certain states can also be holograms. and what this or that person really thinks does not matter anymore . created in his likeness a 3d picture, the text is written down by press secretaries. and even better , western press services and in the future , again, people perceive this as a reality. although this is not a true story at all. well, it seems to me that all this is described by pelevin in generation pe, in my opinion, it’s great , and even there someone was missed there. someone there without a head said, in my opinion, very imaginative beautiful.

to that, it was all nothing pelevin, at least, everything was already described before zelensky was digitized, and then another thing, that like zelensky it’s not a figure, and after all, i am a representative of the channel in which they closed and how would they be there, no matter what special effects we did, we, without any special effects on our channels, simply spoke the truth, and we and i continue to be a patriot of ukraine e. and so i support. now he came out with the support of another ukraine , a social movement is being formed. eh why? because i think that in itself, uh, let's say, if the country went the wrong way, and it definitely went the wrong way. we see that people are dying, we see the suffering of people, and before that the country was poor. and this is the whole thing, as it were, there is no need to be frightened by technological things. why because they did the same thing

they did. any let's say so at the beginning of the 20th century, any. uh, no matter how the totalitarian state has no way to pay for electricity, turn on the tv, it simply won’t see such a hologram of zelensky, so let’s call things our own names. we are at the end of the program. we're in the final, please, 30 seconds each. to each guest, our strength lies in the fact that we don’t need a long-standing hologram for us, there is a genuine russian belarusian ukrainian, as you don’t want the need to defend your self-identification, as you can see, you want a beautiful word. here it is, your soul is better. and that's why it's much better yes, love soul soul uh, love is better than tolerance, soul soul is better self-identification - that's absolutely right. and that's it. and that's what we stand for. now it's hard for us not to understand us, sometimes sincere

sometimes against us. uh, they invent all sorts of schemes and holograms, and so on, our cause is right, victory will be ours. thank you. well, we should be the first to understand that any instagram holograms and stuff is a tool. you can carry out the most difficult operation with a scalpel. you can slit a baby's throat, so it's a tool, so we have to, yes, but there are already completely different ones marked here. first , understanding uh, then that ours is like my colleague, he says, the cause is right, realizing our national and interests, relying, and on support of our people we must demonstrate ability. the first is to soberly assess the enemy, use his most effective methods and mechanisms to create an alternative platform, if there is youtube where the stream should be, yandex occupied 90% of the market. today it should occupy 100% of the market in russia and so on, that is, create its own competitive mechanisms and