the sun's rays and the light that simulates the sun heats the panel, er, converting the sun's energy into water heating energy for the home. now we are at -20 mark. this is the lowest point of our quarry, if we compare it with the level of the baltic sea, then we will say 20 m under water and share the intricacies of our work, which they simply adore. yes, it looks like a toy will carry 90 tons of rock . we are laying a foundation for the future. to introduce innovation. this is a concern for the state, and the nation her education.

look, project one day on belarus 24 tv channel. every day we work to ensure that you receive the latest and most useful information . the 20-minute format allows us to talk about what is happening in belarus and the world , share objective facts about a healthy lifestyle, propose projects and films that will definitely become your favorites, they are good. and we achieve peaceful ones as a result of selection. oh god such chicks. need to keep even families with children this and more.

the broadcast is waiting for you in the project 24/7. look at tv channel belarus 24. belarusian winter all its little things. what is breathtaking? some awkward together, not harmony looking at them you feel aesthetic pleasure. do you feel that belarus is closer?

my name is, as before, aleksey viktorovich belyaev but today i am acting in a new capacity as dean of the faculty of journalism of the belarusian state university and today i would like to talk, of course, firstly, about the problems of training modern journalists about who they should become and how we can do this achieve, well, on the other hand the soul of a historian and political scientist cannot ignore topics related to the preservation of historical memory and the current political situation. and, of course, what worries everyone will there be peace in our land? victoria popova and tatyana shcherbina from the studio are in

the studio today alexey belyaev good afternoon. hello hello alexey viktorovich well, the first question is to congratulate or sympathize with you in connection with your new appointment as a fabric of the faculty, everyone reacts differently, that is, i have not yet been your dean. eh, ever since as we saw each other, it seems like a little time has passed. yes, but somehow life is now developing in our fast society. eh, somehow at a very cosmic pace, therefore , yes, positions change, but i think that we people do not change. this is the main thing we stay. yes, but i think that one can, perhaps, congratulate me on the fact that i was given the opportunity to, as it were, head a faculty that is actually legendary, so, of course, i think, any normal person who is somehow in the journalistic environment. of course it turns i would probably be happy that he was entrusted with

such a large, important, interesting faculty, on the other hand. of course , you can sympathize, because the work of modern journalists is very much, and it is more and more responsible. well, those who prepare them, respectively, also take on a large share of this responsibility when you work in the media environment. i do not consider myself a professional journalist. i consider myself so, not not to some extent even, probably, self-taught. although the basic philological education is unconditional, it helps to put letters into words to write some texts. on the other hand, basic historical education and long studies in political sciences make it possible to put some meaning into these words. i hope for those who read. texts that periodically appear in various media

who listen to the performance. i think they're having a good time consuming that information. i'm trying to give alexey viktorovich is reading now. you know, as soon as you were appointed immediately by our opponents. the eternals have dubbed you a body character. that is, they not even familiar with your publications, but something else is interesting. have you considered or not? or is it such a proposal, from which one cannot think for as long as 15 minutes. yeah although i was given the opportunity to think, as they say to sleep with this thought to think until the next day, but i somehow lately start making decisions very quickly, because uh, well, there are such obvious things when two plus two adds up to four very quickly, therefore, yes, i am really well aware that the faculty is extremely difficult, that all journalists, firstly, people are creative, secondly, i know

the teaching environment. doesn't matter. what kind of journalistic mathematical physical history teacher of higher educational institutions, complex people are all very ambitious. everyone has their own ideas about this life. moreover, for example, teachers are used to teaching others. and, of course, it is very very difficult for them to perceive when someone tries to teach them something unconditionally. this is all understood. there is such a moment that when a person is invited. e to one place of work from another, that is often perceived. as some kind of stranger alien, it is not clear that there will always be some kind of wary attitude towards him. at least the first time. that is. i'm all the risks of all these things, as a political scientist perfectly analyzed the excellent understand. maybe 20 minutes it all went much faster. here is further simply

process was such. and why do i need it, we are here and here, as it were, there is. you know, you ended up in turkey. i significantly reduced the time to get to work by 30 minutes, so this moment also certainly played a role. here, well in fact, of course, uh, if you put aside the jokes, then, well, this is a very uh responsible assignment. eh, but at the same time it’s very interesting, i always tried to look for a job according to my interests, because to sit and , for example, as a teacher and teach there for 10-20 years don't read no more books. when you, in general, stop in development, because supposedly you have known everything. you

, too, in fact, such a very erroneous point of view is very dangerous. but sometimes people get used to it. yes, all the time, being in one environment in one place. that is why there is such a psychological law that once a person is about 4-5 years old, it is necessary to change the field of activity. eh, well, a little bit even earlier, so when you have new tasks, when you have a need for yourself, it means something new. you discover the world for yourself. so far i've come across the world of journalism. eh, just exactly, as an author, writing, as a participant in various kinds of television programs, as member of some radio show. now i have such a great opportunity to look at the training of professional journalists from a teaching point of view, and there is a very significant difference here, when you decide for yourself, then and how you

want to tell the world, yes, and when you are responsible that you must prepare to release a large number of specialists, as they say for the needs of our economy in its various branches, and what a difficult site you got and your very first fight with political scientist vadim elfimov in the editors' club. let's see that we don't have public criticism. the media we have are dealing with these issues and broadcasting the truth on television and various kinds. there are revealing. we have every day program times for a whole hour. it's just a question of such a spreading of the problems that exist , the question is that the tasks in this case, identifying the shortcoming, then try to eliminate it. they're in to scream oh, here's the potholes on the road. let's take the whole state to hell and be build new ones with good ones. by the way, this position is absolutely not constructive, so i think what is the task of objectivism.

yes, it certainly sounds good. but this can also be a trap, because here you are that you gave an example. yes there, ostensibly objective independent mass media in fact, he told the state exam. yes direction, therefore objectivity. eh, this is, of course, very good, but i can safely assure you that today the information struggle is going on and the journalist is colliding with ideology. out of this fight it cannot turn out to be, he cannot turn out to be an outside observer, so every journalist has to, sooner or later. and it’s better to choose a certain position early and defend it as a state one. of course , this would be constructive and good. so it's still objectivity. or, so to speak, the ideological sharpening should be the first guideline for a journalist. well, vladimir alekseevich, of course, is an experienced journalist himself, a practitioner. uh, both as a leading writer as a journalist, but also as a teacher. for many years at the faculty of journalism, therefore, he it is also clearer from the teaching

point of view, but in our actual words, and here are supposedly picks, there is no big contradiction. e when i spoke about objectivism. i meant that, after all, a journalist bears responsibility; he makes a cast of his time for posterity, leaving his reports in his e, his newspaper notes. uh, some uh tv appearances. well, it’s desirable, depending on the genres of your photographs, leaving a piece of the real life that we have now and according to him, according to this blindness, then the future generation will evaluate us, they will judge our life, that's why the journalists are here. still, there is a task. in my opinion. it is to try to give a cast of this life as close as possible to reality, but no one says that journalists should not be positioned. the journalist is looking for topics . the journalist is looking for some problems. yes

, the journalist looks at this reality. from an angle that other ordinary people would not even think of looking at her from an angle that he they said in the editorial office this is also unconditional. but we must understand the specifics of the work, that's what, uh, in this case, of course, the journalist must choose the right editorial office. that 's great. we understand that, of course, today is journalism. in fact, this is a serious powerful weapon in the conditions. eh, that's this information society and a journalist today. er, well, there are different types of journalism. yes, here are journalists, a social activist a journalist of a socio-political orientation, of course, this is a person who will say things that will be unpleasant to many speak harshly, but that is what he will attract to himself as a journalist. there is the work of expert analysts who sit and think, weigh all the pros and cons, who

say this is good. this is a bad job for a journalist, of course, it should be a little different for him to be clear, he must say. here we are going there, i agree, because for a long time we were taught at the same journalism faculty that objectivity is a stringent situation, and so on , this can be scientific work, but journalism is still of some degree. this or public activity. in order to attract attention, it requires certain actions in a real journalist. here's one that works in the public field. he must shock unconditionally. this is also a style of behavior, a style of speaking, a style of clothing , who can, yes, of course, the highest levels of journalism are when you strike a person with the depth of your thought, when you make him look at things. here with his eyes, with which he himself cannot see your reader-listener. e, your

e, so to speak, viz. yes you make him to look at some things that are familiar, perhaps to him , from a completely unusual angle and not only make you, but make you believe that your version of reality is more truthful and more interesting. this, of course, is the pinnacle of journalistic skill. let's return to the question of ideology. what do you think, but it is needed in general today. e, in general, adhering to nekrasov's lines. e, therefore, could you not be a citizen? a journalist is obliged to be a citizen twice, or even triple, so, of course, e, we cannot say that a journalist is just an idiot. eh, this is just a conductor of a particular ideology. eh, in the sense that journalists are creative people. he may have his own visions. but as they said before, there is a general line of the party within the framework that

can fluctuate, but that cannot be deviated. so, when we are now talking about , uh, some kind of ideological foundations. uh, we owe everyone. uh, to be fair to warn that we are talking about socio-political journalism, you can be a good literary critic. and you can be wonderful there, like a singer of animals and tell nosological topics there or show them there is no politics when you shoot there is some cute family of monkeys driving around. there, by nature, you collect photographs of moose. this is one thing, but when it comes to socio -political journalism, when it comes to the fact that a person voices and conveys some thoughts regarding such a cardinal development of society in the economy in politics. they see themselves lined up in front of them. some kind of picture of the world, and it is not in their head contradictory, then

he will be able to convey this non-contradictory picture of the world and you may not be afraid of you and teach or students as a new leader, because you are such an open person, yes, in every possible way. clearly, i will run and cut down on the right to the left. what does it mean to be afraid? i see my mission not in coming and breaking one of the oldest faculties, which for many decades, as they say faithfully served belarusian journalism, my task - i see it. so let them not be offended by teaching or who work for many years at the faculty, but that's just what they work. there for many years, perhaps, plays a cruel joke. today man from outside. maybe with a fresh, not blurred look, those names are everything already and achievements, of course, and a problem. here, in particular, i

have my task. i see that, first of all, uh, to clean up and bring into line with the information of the time, precisely the most meaningful part of the training of young journalists, because already from what i see in a short time at the faculty, i see that there is, uh, a certain skew. eh, in the direction of some philological skills. eh, that's for sure. it is very important, as i said, the ability, uh, to put letters into words in a sentence, the ability to use different styles, the ability to generally present your idea, beautifully competently. this is all fine, but there must be an idea to submit something. e form, uh, in accordance with the content. here i met. so for the time being , uh, in such a very general form with the material. technical base, i will say that this is how a third-party person has never been to this before

faculty, journalism i was very pleased, impressed by what the faculty has. eh, there are really technical means to train a specialist, there is a photo studio, and whether there is a studio and a radio studio , and the necessary computers. that is, this moment this moment is beautiful, and we will talk about it. i don't want to say. no, i don't mean to say that there is no content. but uh, we need to see, after all, what disciplines. you would for this i still need to deeply familiarize myself with the training programs, but i certainly understand that yes discipline socio-political plan. perhaps my experience as a lecturer in political science. e hmm well, let's develop some yes, even maybe author's courses, but a modern journalist. who writes on economic topics, but he has no right not to know the basics, the basics

of the economy, a journalist writing on socio-political topics cannot but know the political science of the state structure. and not just political science, which was read to him within the framework of one semester, was read to him, there were 10-12 lectures held 10-12 classes a journalist should understand. that is, he must thoroughly understand the issues of the structure of modern states , the modernity of complex social systems. a journalist needs a little more than, uh, some physicist, mathematician, uh, to understand, uh, the organization of state authorities , the possibilities of their uh, actions in different directions in different areas. now we have uh, in our lives, uh in leaps and bounds, artificial intelligence. here is an example. gpt is able to generate any ideology based on the texts you

throw it in here is your forecast of how neural networks and their development can affect future journalism. you know, of course, uh, everyone is afraid of modern technology. they were always afraid of them once they were playing and breaking cars , they believed that they would take their earnings from them. once upon a time , the ancient scribes of books were even very distrustful of printing. and even more than that i will say. i gangutenberg my own first book after the invention of the printing press and this technology. he did them in a special way, but he tried, but how to forge them under a handwritten one, i.e. this font. here he is bergovsky's first, he imitated a handwritten font. why because everyone perfectly understood a handwritten book - it's expensive? and if this technology is mass production - it's cheap, of course, no one wants to lose earnings. that's what concerns modern technologies,

including the development of a neural network. e definitely. uh, we're not going anywhere with her. this is a very big help today and in whole uh, industries, uh, both industrial and public life sectors, the neural network is already used, but, it seems to me naive think that they will replace a person. after all, that's when, again, i have a wealth of teaching experience. i worked for a long time. the time is also very interesting at a university that i respect very much, the belarusian national technical university, where i had to deal with engineering students, as they are called by completely different people than there, students of the faculty of journalism, as i already understand, here are other people than, there students are historians , philologists, political scientists and the humanities in general, but uh, doing the humanities with them . i always tried to convince him that

technique. eh, this is only the external design of a person’s life, a person is still basic. okay neural networks. they will write. they will write better than the authors. yes, but for whom will they do it, who will read them? why is it necessary? because when we talk about journalism about journalism, of course. there is an important village. she responds to these needs of the day. she reacts to problems and not just like that, but so that these problems are then solved and so that life, just an ordinary person, becomes better and easier, but the neural network can write anything. but to read herself will be offended by herself. eh, will this be a big question for us as representatives of humanity, certainly from the point of view. today, after all, work with these large arrays of information, these big data

technologies. eh, this is the most important class of our life. it makes our life very easy when we say that it makes life easier for a person. we assume that a significant part of the work people may not need to do. this means they release free time, what they will spend it on. here is the question. we must ask ourselves not to be afraid of these networks, but to speak well. they allow us to simplify our lives. uh, they free up a lot of free time. what we spent it on, what usefulness the students spent it on recently they baked pancakes and treated the newly-made dean. damn well, and potato pancakes and lovely raspberries hope you enjoy working with creative journalists. in general , i myself, if i have already said, you have read all these references written about me, multiply, by the way,

written by itself created some kind of representation. yes, he created a biography, which then scattered across many sites. well, i'll tell the truth. i didn't lie. yes, but i grew up in a really creative environment, because the faculty of philology, which i graduated from vitebsk state university. it was a very such hmm very creative place for a little while. we have a telegram channel. say don't be silent. subscribe ask questions and suggest guests we are in touch. on the air say it again, don't be silent. and today we have aleksey belyaev, dean of the faculty of journalism of the belarusian state university, visiting aleksey viktorovich well, as it turned out, the learned educators, as it turned out, you also unconditionally believe in the power of education. yes, that's what the mountain said, but nonetheless. you say that

education is necessary and good. uh, and that's a lot of talk about that through the knowledge of education. you can build some kind of, uh, beautiful society, then. explain like a historian. uh, how did an educated german, but managed to instill the ideas of nazism in just a few years and in such a way that they then they even took a direct part in the genocide, including belarusians. well, as a historian of the night from afar, but in fact, uh, if we take the problem. the education of the enlightenment is really here in the history of europe, for example, there was a period that is called the age of enlightenment, and now, just this period was famous for the fact that science and scientific knowledge were erected on some kind of almost divine pedestal, that is, it was believed that science could to replace everything with itself since those times, by the way, two

such mythologemes, e european public consciousness. uh, two such bright personalities, yes, two such bright images that everyone certainly knows, but one is known to people, probably more intellectually developed, and the other is known to everyone , including young people. i'm talking about two scientific myths about these scientists, which are also reflected in the literature. then in art the first dr. faust is a man who e. when the devil tries to seduce him, yes, in fact, it turns out that the devil cannot offer anything to faust, then faust can do it all himself here, it was just the quintessence of that idea of ​​​​science of what higher power faust can make himself gold with mercury faust artificial man homunculi are grown in a test tube, that is, the creator of the scientist is equal to god well, they caught him there in love with a woman, as

always. yes, it ruined him, but this is such a beautiful high story, and young people know more about the other name frankinstein, also dr. frankenstein, who created the living from the dead , it again became at the level of god, yes, that is, he collected the remains of human bodies there legends that both of these appeared in the 17th century in germany, they were almost simultaneously and germany was one of the centers of the science of education of the enlightenment in europe and so on german universities. this is something that's just what was famous for? yes, we smoothly approach those same germans who understand. and then these highly educated people who created the most beautiful science without german philosophy would not have had modern philosophy. uh, as goethe says, this is uh, a reflection of such an artistic german philosophy, and there is uh,

rational thought comrades. such as kant , such as hegel , without whom modern philosophy probably would not have taken place. i don't take. now there are ancient greeks and so on, but here are the basics of dialectical philosophy. e hegel we are a school in soviet times and e, this is a wonderful cultural heritage, which is philosophy is a science that makes you think. yes, philosophy is science. in general, about everything , science, which allows you to comprehend the world in a complex way. everything, together all these scattered pieces of the mosaic and yes people brought up on goethe, brought up on kant, there on fichte nasled. and god knows, and hegel , yes, they suddenly give birth. this monster is a monster of fascism, a monster, nazism is born. this is logic, strict rationality without a soul, yes, strictly rationality without a soul.

here is faust from whom the devil took the soul. here we get the same. how do you see. see, in general. the legend of frankenstein, and his frankenstein monster, it should have made you think. why are you investing? here in these dead pieces of bodies life, what do you want? this is the same as later our brilliant horror, russian writer mikhail gaakov, with a dog 's heart, told e through the mouth of professor preobrazhensky that i can, of course, make a man out of a dog, but why if any russian woman gives birth to the same, yes, that is do you understand the meaning of these eternal struggles? yes, all these attempts. e with the creator e to turn there to become at least one level or rise

above it, yes, the misfortune of humanity , humanity sometimes burrows, as they say, yes, and goes somewhere deep flight, which then leads to both gorgeous, yes, the deepest fall. we are so eager for the sun we forget. eh why? yes , that appears. eh, now you understand how, it turns out, it turns out that yes, this e is excessive rationalism, but sometimes it will help for the performance. and some kind of exclusivity itself yes, multiplied by a certain snobbery. i'm so smart all of myself. and you are nobody there, i taught you and the same germans. yes, they told us how many years they taught us, we created a state for you. here this is the famous in history, norman theory of the origin of russia that supposedly the scandinavians came, in fact, these germans, led by rurik, and these stupid, incompetent

slavs took control, taught them everything , created a state for them. i mean, it's all historical. in fact , the role of the scandinavians has long been refuted. the only question that is greatly exaggerated is that we were offered sources written by these german authors there, miller, who was one of the first to write the history of the russian state. they were offered offered their author's point of view is saturated through and through. here it is with nazm further everything grew like a snowball, therefore, of course. of course, how such smart cultured people, uh, create such monsters , such monsters, uh, soul. responsibility morally uh, some kind of ethical component . here it should lie largely inside. no, this is an exclusively scientific rational approach to the world. that's what we say our ideology is practically, akin to

religion. yes, uh, religion, ideology is something that is not focused on a walkie-talkie, it's a feeling, and first of all, when we talk about society, we must understand that relations are within society. yes, it is not regulated by laws. especially in today's society, but the laws are growing. from what from a sense of justice from a feeling that, here is something that is not subject to rational analysis, because justice is at the heart of all laws. what is justice? this is actually our subjective idea of ​​how should yes, what should be and any law, because it is based, uh, the basic position on what we want to achieve. that's it this justice. therefore, if you have lost a sense of justice, you have lost, in general, the sensory perception of the world is emotionally based, including on empathy for others. yes

, to the idea that i can be in the place of another person. if you have lost this, then you will follow the letter, not the spirit , and as a result, you understand. and you have long , by the way, been proposing to call collaborators, clearly and with the usual word traitors, but let's listen to your colleague doctor of historical sciences. natalya column was not long ago in our studios. here's what she said. larisa genusha the first days of the war are already bombing minsk , blood is shed, brest is in the blood, the great poet larisa geiner is collecting pears to undermine the unremarkable german army and the red skin of the german army signed and pears and the ocean contributed to the undermine of the belarusian. i want to emphasize the army, not only for peace, but to emphasize, and

on the territory of occupied belarus they received, and not occupational little stamps, and the flight of the stamp, moreover, in my articles and in the newspaper you can give, but an example, but hmm rations, which they received and daily, in addition to sausages, cereals and so on , be sure to have coffee in hungry minsk yes, nowhere. get rid of the fact that these people do not need. here we abstract, but from their position, so to speak , from everything people who every day walked around minsk around the city. and where the gallows were not empty. well, first of all, uh, according or not? there is an opportunity to discuss with a colleague, now at least in absentia, and, secondly, it may really be a matter of terminology. why are there historians in your writings? i mean, this memory

of collaborators lives on about what happened in minsk in years, firstly, well, the very word collaborationism. where did it come from, that is, collaborators. uh, they began to call people to france, that is, the collaboration of cooperation. yes, collaboration is such a buzzword now . i do not like him. that's right, firstly, because you can eat there are russian analogues of absolutely calmly applied cooperation. here, and in this case, well , french collaborators began to be called laboratorists in french, that is, those who collaborated with the germans. this is, uh, the government of marshal pitten, which the vichy government was sitting in vichy, which essentially signed the capitulation of france and which embarked on the path of direct cooperation. she helped the germans organize the life of her citizens, the work of factories, which then supplied equipment to the eastern front and collected for the germans. here the harvest is by or the germans in fine french

wine. well, then they had a negative connotation in france, but for the french , the word collaborator, of course, yes, collaborating. uh, for a long time after the war we have no such philological there were no explorations. we have written good serious books. that's about e people who collaborated with the nazis, and there was such a thing. the red book of the belarusian researcher romanovsky, uh, it was called in belarusian saudelniki no collaborators. and everything is clear, clear and understandable, then already in the nineties they began to impose this narrative on us gradually, replacing the word traitor. uh, accomplice bandit criminal, yes , it definitely was. eh, whole again. uh, a special operation to infiltrate through various

western funds. e into our historical science of certain visions. yes, certain approaches. they tried to tell us that, well, historical science. it must be objective uh, the term collaborators in the west is a bad negative. come on, but you will approach western science, but for us it is for our citizens. this term is just from the fact that you call a person a traitor about a criminal or call him a collaborator. indeed , a lot of attitudes are changing, and, uh, collaborationism, as a scientific term. yes he used, i used it when i was working on my dissertation it is a thing, yes, that makes a person think differently language is a way of thinking. yes, a way of understanding reality, therefore, i am always a big opponent of using any foreign words, if we have our

own, these are not analogues, but our own words, which reflect the essence of the phenomenon. and when we just give up the form, being replaced by another more beautiful, more aesthetic one , we give up the essence. just in history, for example, there are such plots that are very difficult to bewitch and which are very difficult, in fact, to hide here is the history of the great high-quality history of the atrocities that were committed on our land by the german nazis and their henchmen. these collaborators are traitors, uh, this story that we see is very difficult to hide. although our ukrainian neighbors they left, but from their history. they have forgotten these horrors. they forgot eriha. they forgot koch, who was a guileiter of all ukraine, like bandera they killed their own ukrainians just because they did not want to live in this bandera

nationalist paradise, when all this, uh, the story began. yes, we have already discussed. this is somehow one of the transmissions with you, which, of course, was imposed step by step gradually. and those who were at the head of ukraine , either consciously or out of misunderstanding, did not make any attempts. it's a hitch at some point. it all crossed a dangerous line and began to grow as an active opposition to these attempts, even those of our opponents , to rewrite history. well, first of all, uh, i want immediately tell our opponent and everyone else. eh, no matter how history is rewritten, but all the same, the historical reality will come out. well, look, ukrainians are fighting bolshevism with this right-wing de-communization with monuments and so on , they behave in exactly the same way as the bolsheviks, the bolsheviks did. they wanted to erase all

the historical memory of the period of tsarism ; they destroyed monuments to tsars; they destroyed books. here are the temples, yes, some historical buildings. uh, did they manage to rewrite? no, it didn't work anyway, uh, all those bits of knowledge. all it all came out anyway. here is beautiful. there is a moment, uh, connected with the spasskaya tower of the kremlin. that is, the bolsheviks also hung a star on it, and there, as they say, everything was removed in the end, in the end, anyway, at the entrance gate. it turned out that this icon was preserved, which was well hidden by someone with a net , hung with plaster and smeared over, supposedly, then they fought with religion. yes, they destroyed them now after many years they opened it and it turned out that this icon was preserved there true. history, real history, it's still not is forgotten. there are people, and here are historians, who

bit by bit collect this information, which, of course, face huge problems. today, for example, we have to write our history. e even recent years. yes, now it will be necessary to overcome the boundaries of permission to receive. even for example, the belarusian history of russia, but now that's what the majority is. yes , this is a gap in human connections, if only poland and we just have human connections to a lesser extent, but what has happened? ukraine what have they done baltic states? i want to say, yes, lithuania. or a significant part of our historical heritage is stored in lithuania only because the grand duchy of lithuania once received the name of the first lithuanian and then the true russian female. yes, the archives are on, our historical events are described there. this is the metric of the grand duchy of lithuania was given to vilnius to lithuania today, belarusian

researchers are cut off from the opportunity to study their historical heritage thanks to. here are the boundaries prohibition and everything else understanding that, well, how would the political policy of the scientific community should be, the scientific community should communicate. we have such an understanding, but they do not, and try to get it again from the topic. here we have a lot of love for our polish friends. talk about how the red army destroyed the poles. what bad soldiers are the red armies? what good soldiers of the regional army ah. try to get access to the polish archives in order to study, for example, the situation with the red army soldiers who were captured after this famous one. uh, the soviet-polish war of 1919-21. the poles are completely trying to cut off the opportunity for us to study how they muzzled and killed our soldiers, who turned out to be, you understand alexander of course

, the question is the question of historical memory. uh, the responsibility of the scientific community, scientists are people too. they also live in their own states. they also perform to some extent. eh, we are the orders of our countries, when we talk about objective history, yes, then all the same, every nation writes history from its own point of view. roth skimming history through the prism of their state and their interests , but again, there are objective things , there are events that happened, what happened there in 1385 in the current belarusian cream, a strong union was concluded to be interpreted. this event. we can do it differently. but we are now coming to such moments when they don’t even try to interpret history and try to rewrite it, they just try to prohibit it, just delete it and not give the opportunity to find out

about any fact. after all, you can treat the leaders of the communist movement differently, but the monuments that were to them the streets that have been named after them make us turn to these people once again. remember this story as soon as we remove the symbol from space. yes, we are closing this symbolic space. that's how uh a simple man who is filmed by historical studios all the time how he can try to comprehend what happened he still needs a reminder to help us with your optimism. you said that communism will emerge from communism, but historical memory still returns if someone does not can regain its historical memory, it is dying like a people for the time being. let's uh, let's take a break. after a short pause , we will return to this studio as a basis, while subscribe to our telegram channel. say, do not be silent, but look for all our releases on the youtube channel, belarus alone and on the website of the belteller

radio company. on the air again, say, don't be silent, and in our studio, the dean of the faculty of journalism of the belarusian state university alexey belyaev alexey viktorovich, we will probably have time to ask you just one question at the end. last time. i remember very tortured. when, when, day, hour, when will stop his own, but now it is already clear to everyone that this is all for a long time and seriously, but i wanted to ask you a question, look at the view of the twentieth year, then eh, what 's next judging by your question. yes, you want to lead us to the fact that some more apocalypse awaits us, yes, that is, it is logical to assume that a special military operation will be followed by nuclear bombardments of each other and the world will plunge into the eternal nuclear earth, or aliens will attack. this issue is also already getting very intensified now. yes, i saw the map all reports of alien sightings are marked.

so, there is no living place on the map of the usa, that is, all americans see them directly . the question is: then why are aliens so attracted to the usa? you see. well, or are they watching them very much, or are they manipulating them? yes, the next thing is that the world order has already collapsed, which was established after the second world war. and we are waiting for reformatting, by the way, what our president openly spoke about in his recent communication with foreign belarusian journalists hmm but this is, uh, obviously really the thing is that the old principles don't work. eh, the old ties have been lost and , accordingly , some new principles of the new international community must be created and a new hierarchy, a new system, where everyone will have their designated place. and here we understand that this is

a military activity that is taking place now on the southern borders of belarus in neighboring territories. uh, all that right here, uh, such perseverance that the western world is trying to defend its elusive right to be the world hegemon and the only pillar and a pillar of international relations, of course. all this is very sad. that is, here the conflict is clearly expressed, which should end . the victory of one of the parties is only a question of whose, that is. if this is the victory of the west, then it turns out that they will finally finish off this world, because they have already , for 500 years, established their colonial system to part with, which they absolutely did not want to, when they could not, there are purely political and physically keep subjugation

of very distant countries. they created economy systems. subordination created this global world, where everything rests on the economic center of the united states on the dollar, as a world currency on some standards and some international law, which is again dictated by washington well, if today, god forbid, they win again, then this is the end everything, but they will not win or lead. only because, if only for one reason, that hmm for the victory of the military-technical confrontation. today they do not have enough strength to eat. eh, today. most importantly, they were always very afraid of mine they didn’t scold me and they said that i’m so bad that mankind invented atomic weapons here i, for example, for myself e my views, yes, i revised it, if there were no nuclear weapons, today there would be even more chaos catastrophe nuclear weapons continue to be a deterrent

and i think. that all the same, the remnants of reason are preserved on all sides, and in conditions where no one can win, uh, or victory will be the result from zero sum, when everyone dies, sooner or later you will have to agree. now the question is about that e offset, for example, the same ukrainian ukrainians. uh, it's just that the parties designate for themselves the conditions for negotiations. and it's sad that the ukrainians allowed themselves to be dragged into this bloody mess to make themselves not even a bargaining chip. yes well do transform yourself. it's just that in some material with which they play there cubes that are shifted do not need to be thrown away. it's terrible, but we understand that in fact e shifts. eventually it will run out and, uh,

some new world will be established. the order here is mass people who stretch their little hands to shift these cubes. yes, but they will also decide among themselves, and, unfortunately, those who are now shouting, we are standing here to protect all of humanity. we're fighting the aggressor here. we are your only hope here. give us everything, and they will remain in complete non-existence. they will then rake. here are these terrifying blockages to deal with their problems. let's really hope that they still have enough strength and means, because as usual after such e, games. well and bloody countries themselves account for, yes, which fell, remember what happened to our republic. after the end of world war ii, we were recovering, we reached the level of 1913, in my opinion, we reached there in the mid

-fifties. well, i'm exaggerating, but in fact we had to. we had to deal with the restoration of our country. here is to restore all these huge destruction. from scratch, if not for help , again, there are the same other soviet republics that suffered to a lesser extent. all would not be the same there in part machines were taken out of germany, e.g., in the form of reparation of equipment, it is also unknown what happened to the republics, belarus, but here we are again returning to what we discussed in the previous part. still, our historical memory has been preserved at the level of the people at the level of our political power and our leader, and the fact that, for example , alexander grigoryevich was often poked at the beginning of a special military operation, even back in 2014, when all the events began. after this coup d'état when they told ukraine to alexander yuryevich

, you are doing something like. why are you friends with them, and not bad. but we saw that the policy was actually aimed at not dragging us into the new war, so as not to take at least one careless step, after which you would not get out of this abyss later on. let you better sweat it, let it be better to tear your clothes there , scratch yourself, but you are walking along this thin edge. you saved yourself your life, if you fall there, clean beautiful, yes, then nothing will help you. there are lines that should not be crossed. thank you very much for today's conversation. i hope not the last one stayed with you, but as always, we managed to discuss only a small part. good luck on your new post plot and may you really. it will be possible to benefit our beloved faculty of journalism. and we tatyana shcherbina victoria popova

say goodbye to you today. goodbye. goodbye. and now aleksey belyaev says i want to wish us all peace i want to wish us keep everyone healthy. i would like to wish all of us to be kinder to each other, if we just can in the year of peace and creation, which is now taking place in our country. and, firstly, uh, learn to live in peace with each other, then we will succeed and create something new.

significant sports events in the context of the whole world were very worthy of our girls . they will show the result of key news in the future and belarus sports facts are the flagship of belarusian football. and this, despite a significant renewal of the composition and a change in the coaching bridge, the formation and development of a new generation of belarusian athletes. today we can pay more attention to our hockey, so today we are attracting more children, 40 places are being vacated there for young guys. there is an opportunity to take young guys out of them

to make stars. watch on tv channel belarus 24. culture, history, architecture , collected by the 19th century project in the role of a man, of course, golovans jumping ropes all departed not in the yard. after the paint, especially the number one acceleration of this legend. these details of doylitva yakim have been toiling about for hundreds of years, and today the most prominent and rare for the belarusian speech of storkness is the cartouche on the central cut design.

x architecture of belarus on our tv channel to win in sports arenas, sometimes you need to foresee every step of the opponent. let's go. in which city is the football club of the french ligue 1 psg sergey hoa based in paris, the participants of the program will fight in the battle of the mind in translation from english, this is a team sports game , literally means a ball with paint. what are these talking about? dmitry bint for the correct answers they will get points, and for the wrong ones

they will lose them name the length of the marathon distance. true or athletes who were the first racket of the world in singles, watch the intellectually entertaining show heading on belarus 24 tv channel

. live you watch the main news at noon with you pavel lazovik. hello, and in this issue, an accident near bobruisk collided with a tractor 11 affected. 12 concrete initiatives to resolve the crisis chinese foreign ministry releases peace plan for ukraine