to write about what, well, what an updated concept, well, everything is clear with it , another document of the security forces for the security forces, as it were, that ordinary people in general are in no way concerned with. let's answer them, after all, the concept. how it was created who wrote it, who participated and what what will be its further fate exactly how how? how, when it can be accepted. uh, while working on the, uh, draft concept, we set up an intervezial working group that included representatives. i have already spoken 34 e state bodies and organizations members scientific scientific expert community scientists. uh, representatives of the academy of sciences, that is, our leading institutes of scientific institutes. such as the academy of science, the belarusian institute for strategic studies. this document, firstly, was not born in an office somewhere. and we studied every sphere, every position, worked out, argued , looked at everything, weighed everything, as it were, all the pros and cons, in order to add e. this or that area,

uh, those are the risks, the challenges, the threat that exists today, in order to develop those response measures to these challenges and threats to decompose everything on the shelves. if e considered, for example, the sphere of economic security, then there were specialists and ministers, economics, the minister of finance, ministers, e, labor and social protection, therefore, e, i would not say that this is a military document, we brought the discussion of these provisions to scientific site on the expert site. more than 30 scientific and practical conferences have been held on various sections of the concept of national security , more than 200 articles have been published, if not more, in various media arguments. eh, contradictions. uh, criticism from even our opponents. i haven't heard or studied. yes, there were many many different comments, there were many opinions, we studied them and accordingly came to a common denominator by the end. and after that , they just gave it. they submitted a document for

approval by a member of the security council and submitted it to the security council for presentation to the chairman of our security council, the president of our country , alexander buggy. lukashenka in general. i say the draft concept has been approved and we were instructed to continue further work at the dialogue sites in order to explain the people to the people. what is the difference, let's say, between military documents and nationwide funds that are constantly yes so that people understand that this document is intended to protect their national interests. improving the quality of their lives to increase their social guarantees for the protection of our historical truth of the peoples of power. foundations of the rule of law. all this is here. we have laid all these provisions of the constitution, we have laid all this in the position of the national concept, alexander grigorievich is another question that was raised at the security council, this law, and the people's militia. there are also many rumors of speculation, but nevertheless, why will he work as this people's militia, and who can decide on

the adoption of this law. i consider it timely, based on this really difficult military-political situation. these are the challenges and risks that are being formed today in relation to the republic of belarus, the old xiaomi war is not won by the army of the war the peoples win, therefore the whole people, if necessary, must stand up for the defense of their fatherland. and for this he must have the opportunity. and for this it should be , let's say, legalized. and for this reason , in order to legitimize the possibilities of citizens and the voluntary desire of citizens to protect their fatherland, their home, their locality. here is a law passed. eh, look. if we take, uh, in terms of the number of military organizations of the state, maybe i will reveal some, let's say, secret information, uh, the structure of the military organization the state is not the armed forces in the composition of somewhere up to one and a half. millions of people in the event of a declaration of martial law and the transfer of the economy to war footing, and the population.

we have over 9 million, so the remaining 8 million. of course, they will work in industry to teach people how to grow bread . on the ground to protect public order to combat banditry on the ground suppression looting of the fight against sabotage distributor groups that will go to certain regions of the area. this is what the people's militia is intended for, the people who remain directly will not be called up. uh, at one time or another, to perform tasks as part of the armed forces , the structure of the military organization of the state on the ground. they will prove the responsibility for the formation of the people's militia detachments is entrusted to the local authorities. general responsibility, but the direct leadership of the units of the people's militia. it is entrusted to the territorial bodies of the ministry of internal affairs, that is, it will be an e structure that will provide local police with assistance in fulfilling the tasks

of public order. well, and other tasks in accordance with martial law. it will be voluntary or it will be formed also on the principle of some kind of conscription of people who, for example, do not fulfill the tasks set by the armed forces. they stayed uh at home and then theirs too. maybe somehow they can somehow call or it is exclusively voluntary. it's exclusive voluntary e. the desire of citizens to stand up for their own, firstly, they will not be exempted from doing their job e quit their jobs in their free time. well, of course, by the decision of one or another leader. they can be released for a certain period of time from the performance of their civic duties, that is, in their jobs. they will, uh, be released by the leaders with pay and perform as public teams in the field at one time or another, according to. these are the duties of a person to provide these tasks on the ground. they will be issued with small arms, the weapons will be kept with them to live. they will live at home and eat. they will be at home. this is

an opportunity to legitimize the desire of a citizen to secure his home, his place, where you live. uh, keep order for your family for your children. here, uh, on the ground, an important point to understand, i also see that people are wondering if there are territorial troops. there is a people's militia. it is the same. this completely different things or the people's militia is part of the territorial troops. that is, explain here, please, this is not exactly the same territorial troops. this is, as it were, a structural unit that will be recognized through the military enlistment office, and provided , uh, with military uniforms. well, and, accordingly, weapons will also live , uh, not at home. and e in the place where e is determined, the headquarters of the territorial defense area or the pants of the territorial defense and the territorial howl. slightly wider range of tasks territorial troops will be involved in the protection of some specific objects in their regions in their corners of the region of the region

to perform some tasks to cover sections of the state border, but and so on. people's militia. this is, firstly, uh, people who will not be called up, the armed active armed forces in the territorial troops, other structures , serving in the people's militia or performing tasks as part of the people's militia, it does not exempt from responsibility or from the possibility of being called up or mobilized, that is, er, if necessary , one who will perform tasks in the people's militia as necessary. it can be recognized if the state of health allows, accordingly, it fits the category of conscription and can be drafted into the active army. how will the category be determined? is it possible for a person to join the people's militia, that is, obviously, it is also impossible to directly take everyone there who wants it correctly. in principle, in the law on the people's militia, in practice, a wide field of activity and opportunities is given to the leader. uh, the governor, first of all, the chairman of the district executive committee on making a decision whether to give a person a weapon or not, if

a person is able, in my understanding, he has legs, two hands have the strength to take a machine gun in his hands and stand up for his home, such a right he will be given here are the lists naturally, the president set the task that, of course, the work will be carried out and in peacetime the categories of citizens we have women will be studied. why if someone from the female wants to stand up for his fatherland, and he has e power of the possibility of desire, why not remember the history of the great patriotic war. we have partisan detachments. there are examples when women led and led successfully. here, therefore, this is not forbidden, but the most important thing is that this is the desire of a person, closing this topic in the media , they wrote that an experiment had recently taken place. about the organization of the people's militia, how successful was it in the clinical area, a detachment of the people's militia was created from local citizens, with appropriate coordination of e-territorial bodies of the state security committee of the ministry

of the interior. in a short time, they gave people weapons in their hands, conducted fire training with them, first of all, they told them what tasks they would perform and in general , hmm, everything turned out. in general, it's great. i think in our country the male citizens no longer scare anyone, the call to the training camp. these are all fake, uh, the arguments for the mobilization of some kind of secret mobilization, probably, the citizens have already appreciated and the president has repeatedly spoken and the minister of defense. yeah from the court of my state the secretary sounded not happy that there was no secret mobilization in the country of the president. he says, the truth, first of all, the truth, if we need to mobilize. i think we will be the first to hear this is the essence of the president. here, and not someone else no fake information. that is why. all gathering events that are taking place today on the territory of our country are planned events for 20-25 days, uh, in order to restore the skills of uh and people. in general, they always show desires, aspirations and good results.

show all here are our military reserves. e men who once at some time passed military service show good results to quickly restore their skills. this suggests that our defense of our state is indeed of a nationwide character . alexander grigoryevich, just like you said about the defense of our state this week. we have a holiday on february 23rd. we can't get past. especially given the current time, that you wish all the defenders of the fatherland on this, er, good pleasant holiday. this good holiday. really. e, defenders of the fatherland day e. the right decision, probably , was taken by the president at one time to unite e, earlier it was the red army of the naval flo . that is, this holiday was celebrated, only the military personnel of the armed forces now celebrate it. uh, servicemen of all structures of the power bloc of all those who are serving and those who have served. that is why this is our common

holiday, and this year we are celebrating the 105th anniversary of the formation of the armed forces , this is really not far-fetched. it's uh a holiday that, uh, over the years has already uh, accepted. eh, such a historical, let's say from the guise, here is the basis of e, unites all of us. and what i want to wish today, indeed, probably, the civil people look at our president, as our supreme commander-in-chief, to people in uniform, as a guarantor of the stability and security of our state from people in uniform. today, peace on our earth really depends in many ways, so i take this opportunity. of course, i want to wish all servicemen to our president, first of all the strongest health energy vivacity. success optimism in solving problems of protecting our national interests in protecting our state alexander grigoryevich well , the final thing is that for you as the state secretary of the security council of belarus today the number one issue is peace and security on the territory

of our country thank you very much for the interview. we educate, first of all, involuntarily, we educate a full-fledged citizen of our society, how to maintain a balance between the state and each individual, we came to parliament there in order to defend the interests of their voters, the interests of the country. now, when you are betrayed, it's the same as if your hands are punched, and you seem to forgive. you can, but there is no hug. in my opinion, the more control, the better the law, the better the law is not to let go of the helm of fate, well, through the complexity of the difficulties for yourself. here you try in these situations. you become stronger. you already see things differently. this is probably the only thing for you and me that we must do to save our hearts once. and

two children in our country and in the countries of all, probably all countries of the world, to conscientiously go about their business, let's talk about value. at our landrocks, with a skin kilometer , we are approaching where we can joke off the chestnuts that they hawked for us did not go to waste. no,

people's bloodworms come to life. scar, i wish i had keyberali for us zhikhars and zhikharki of belarusian veskas even more teak belarusian songs and traditions. come to the cultural and historical project on the pyraminulai on belarus tv channel twenty- four things for you around the clock, do not switch. removed our daily task to talk about belarus to the country and abroad. more than 100 million viewers around the world have access to the projects of our tv channel.

so what is belarus

like ? feel. she needs to be seen with my own eyes. hello dear, on the air of the tv channel belarus 24, watch us every day witches do, belarus is closer.

the club of editors on the air of belarus 1 and belarus 24 is a program in which we are trying to understand the events that are taking place in the country and the world, usually over the past 7 days, although 7 years, again 7 years, although we look behind, of course, e far, far away. e in the past times , because, well, from there the origins of what is happening today e in around our country and i mean the very main topic, which we will say today for a year. e first es svo, but a little later, according to tradition, i will introduce the guests who came to our studio today dmitry alexandrovich zhuk, the head of the holding , olga shpilevskaya, director of the representative office of emt rk world, outlined today. belarus head of the belarusian women's union, one hygienist, head of the knowledge society, oleg gaidukevich, deputy of parliament party leader

henry krivoshey in the director general of the news agency chairman of the belarusian. union of journalists, good evening. well, so ukraine open. today, the western and pro-western media in the first year of the great tragedy, certainly a great tragedy. only as it seems to me, not a year, but already how many nine ten the fourteenth year. yes, in the fourteenth year it began to begin with what, uh, everything. it's over. uh, today there was a complete coup d'etat in ukraine , a lot of people died, the oppression of the russian-speaking population of a special operation began. eh, it started somehow it started anti-terrorist. yes they have it there it was called about the operation on the territory of donbass. i don’t know where they saw terrorists there. especially at first , they began to fight. yes, sweeps began on these. uh,

based on those events, there are already artistic horror films. uh, filmed with creepy footage. well, then you know everything. now let's look at a small e, the report can be argued for a long time. could what is happening today have been avoided or not? i always thought not. and i think each of you felt the same way. we talked about this a lot, nikolai sergeevich cheeks. yes, he spoke here. uh, for a long time before the start of his that believe ukraine, uh, within those uh borders that it uh, at that moment was no longer there, it turned out to be right. over time. we have seen what ukraine has lost. how many a fifth of his territories to the west are going to stop a special military operation, but he can do it, because russia is not ready. as far as i understand, prepare to stop from our own under certain conditions , supplies weapons everything new new ukraine ukraine is losing territory is losing e people and it's been going on for, like, a year now. so the conflict

was inevitable, and the president of our country, alexander grigoryevich lukashenko, he gave a big one the day before. interviews with chinese media agency very hua and some media corporations and told why vladimir putin, in his opinion, made such a decision? let's listen. the russian ukrainian conflict is a year old, yes, we are talking about the causes of this conflict, but a lot is seen from a distance, as we say, and in order to assess the causes of this conflict, we must pass a certain time. it's purely chinese style never need to rush. the time will come, we will dot all the and but absolutely agree with president putin , who says that the root causes do not lie in russia, mockery of the russian-speakers of the russian language. they

were up to 14 years old and it was all pumped up. ah, western states. naturally, no country. neither america nor china would allow their imitators to mock people who simply speak russian and live in russian customs, accept russian culture, especially the insult reached the president of russia from ukraine and the entire russian leadership. there is a whole bunch. cause. there in the fourteenth fifteenth year. the minsk agreements were adopted here in minsk. yeah, normal agreements and ukraine signed these agreements. it was necessary to follow this path, and today the guarantee of donbass would be ukrainian and controlled from kiev, all sorts of rough edges would have been

forgotten long ago. so the russian federation , according to vladimir putin, defended its national interests, was forced to accept such decisions. but what did the west do before that? we know that starting there in 2001, it unleashed a large number. e wars, anat's blog and killed a large number of people , and all of them were under the auspices of the defense of democracy of the national interests of the civilized western democratic world. so what did it all turn out to be? let's hear from the american experts themselves as a result of the war. i want to draw attention to this. we didn’t come up with these figures; the americans themselves give as a result of the wars that unleashed the united states after 2001. almost 900,000 people died more than 30-8 million table refugees. yes, and so the light is still democracy, our teachers of democracy , human rights, have killed 900 since 2001. e

people are what we managed to count. we understand latency, yes, in iraq alone this is a figure. it is known for over a million people have died since the invasion. so we found out that the west, when it actually suspects that an operation is in its interests , is ready to make such decisions, where a million. uh, victims, it's okay, no one brought sanctions against the united states of america to the olympics, how does he drive the athlete went like this. eh, just one thought. here we are now talking about the anniversary of a special military operation. and someone, as the president correctly in an interview, says he is worried or asks such a question. maybe you shouldn't have started it. maybe there was some way to avoid it. so it would not work, nothing ever happens that weapons and money are supplied to some country. it's just that simple, because he worries about it on the example of ukraine. we see, it's great that the west never does anything for someone, he does for himself and pumping

weapons, pumping rhetoric, supporting this regime. it was made with one purpose to unleash a war. they are in order for there to be peace, this was all long before the fourteenth year since the collapse of the ussr, from ukraine they did this project with less success with great success. they did it in the baltics, but the baltics are a little further from the borders and there is no military potential, that is, well , no military potential, but it worked out with ukraine. and if a special military operation had not begun, i will say this thought, which, perhaps, someone would not like , would have been strikes on belarus, i am convinced. i am simply convinced of this, if a war broke out on the territory of russia, and we know that the attack on russia would be 100%, for this everything was done, belarus would be attacked. for what purpose, in my opinion, not in order to seize at the initial stage divert the attention of the russian federation in order for it to have to defend itself on the territory of belarus because we are allies and wage

war on our territory, there would be much more victims than unclear. no, the twentieth year, yes. for the twentieth year, this is all we are now , uh, ukrainians are going to do with him. yes , open all the conflicts around russia that the west inspired, they started. after the collapse of the ussr, support for any nationalist sentiments of any issues. i want to remind now about the chechen war , but sometimes we don’t forget where some chechen terrorists who killed great britain are now resting. great britain still does not issue more than that, these double standards apply to other countries. and where are the terrorists who committed in turkey, e, which are still european, they don’t give out and demand something from turkey , therefore, what the audience should understand is a specially military operation - this is a forced measure of options for others, there would be no war would have come in an even worse form in our investigation more,

maybe , even the matter is not only in ukraine , the president, correctly said, is a whole tangle. here, let's get to the facts. two pockets of military tension were formed, which one way or another would have flared up. this is eastern european at once , several of you have listed ukraine this and transnistria is because of the caucasus and the pacific against china, that's all this pandemonium. taiwan they forget that in addition to taiwan there was also hong kong why is it so easy for the chinese, for example, to understand the belarusian position . uh, it didn’t work out there, they were transferred to belarus. this, too, needs to be done clearly and then covid. by the way, speaking of who started it. why do you need to watch the americans designate just their documents you need to read the two main opponents in the international oreniya china and russia against they unfold the pressure system. and it started. it did not begin in the fourteenth year. she's not even coming. putin

here you think about it, a strategy for expansion is being adopted. nato in the ninety-seventh year, this is the weak yeltsin, this is russia, weakened which they say, is falling apart in the ninety -ninth year, september cost the russians only a little bit to show their teeth there, a march to pristina, then in september of the ninety-ninth year, a multi-national command is created, the north- east against whom she sent from finland were going to fight then or with sweden or what? of course not, next step. george putin fraternizes with him. look, russia was the first to turn out to be us support after the september september 2001 terrorist attacks, which completely provided all the logistics in afghanistan. russia withdrew its troops from kosovo russia withdrew the base cam ran vietnam russia withdrew the lordess response of the missile defense system and they lie, because they say, we will deploy in poland and romania against whom, yes, that is. here they are already

then to this. they were preparing not even in the fourteenth year, they all begin, that you remember the situation that was in hong kong. here is what happened in belarus . if you study carefully, you will discover, well , quite simple, lying on the surface on the surface of the source of information. you'll see that it was absolutely a blueprint for how it all happened. all this has been tried. in hong kong, another small ban, which means that another war was very much needed, given the fact that it was necessary to stop the nord stream. here is the convergence the european union and russia at a certain moment practically launched the nord stream, which could really be a european continent, which means that the americans could not strengthen it from the inside. yes , there was poland, the position of lithuania, but still the will of germany, the will of france, the same was enough for that time in germany. yes, austria occupied positions. she is now trying too even in this name situation. yes, this is not supplied, and the americans needed something radical here in order to destroy these projects

heartily. here is the rabbi. ukraine was bridgehead. let's still remember a short report prepared. and why was putin forced to do this for a moment of attention, a prosperous ukraine with peaceful cities and happy citizens in a matter of years went from a coup d'état to a hot confrontation in 2014, the streets of the capital plunged into controlled chaos with a barricade and people with pots on their heads became an indispensable attribute. kiev holiday of disobedience with pleasure. visited by western politicians without fear for their lives us assistant secretary of state victoria nuland fed the protesters with livers to start active actions on the part of supporters of democratic change was not enough, but malice and desire for reprisal. to do this, they organized the execution of protesters , sniper groups killed several dozen

people, the events were broadcast. live from several cameras subsequently , the names of the dead were entered in the list of the heavenly hundred, and from their death they made a cult of sacrifice for the future of great ukraine in many ways. this became the foundation for the development of the ideas of nazism in the country. for many years, who received funding from local oligarchs, they transferred young sports guys to the format of armed militants, put them at the heart of the right sector and others. the neo-nazi divisions divided the country into two camps, while in kiev they built a new great ukraine with support. find their superiority. in the east of the country

, they looked with horror at what was happening. moreover, they did not forget to call them quilted jackets and colorados openly raised the issue of coercion and a new form of ukrainian poetry on may 7, 2014 , a black company arrived in mariupol subsequently battalion. zozov after 2 days, a column of civilians was shot, celebrating victory day. those days were remembered and the punitive operations in the odessa house of trade unions of anti-maidan activists were locked in the building and set on fire, poisoned by smoke and 48 people were burned alive, several dozen. wounded civil confrontation in ukraine grew into an armed conflict. the east of the country was literally put on the threshold of survival. all this time in ukraine there was

a struggle against dissent, separatists and enemies declared anyone who dared to speak contrary to the general line of the already official maidanov of kiev , a series of high-profile political assassinations swept the country. on february 28, 2015, the former chairman of the kharkiv administration, aleksey kolesnikov, suddenly falls out of the window of the seventeenth floor in kiev. mikhail cherchitov, who dared to speak in the verkhovna rada in defense of the russian language throughout the entire time and active participation in the construction of a new state under the flag of anti-russia was taken by western partners. ukraine pumped up weapons the country created nato training centers for a group of british instructors that have been operating since 2015. in ukraine, said

the british minister of defense benus as a prankster. i'm glad to be with you ukraine know, if you remember we sent you 100 troops to work in the training center as part of operation arbidol back in 2015, but we can consider any options. in the same conversation, the official, apprehensive about russia's reaction, supports ukraine's desire to acquire nuclear weapons, and he himself announced the withdrawal from the budapest memorandum zelensky has consultations at the frame as if for their results there will be no faster guarantee for our state. ukraine matami povna right counselors and mustaches. by the ninety-fourth lesson, her face would have been on her face in russia

. such a development of events was followed with justified apprehension by the kremlin put forward a proposal. look after the security architecture, which should take into account the interests of all parties in the united states completely ignored the proposal to sit at the negotiating table in the white house had completely different plans for the shock fist. west was ready to fulfill its mission , the shelling of donbass in 2022 intensified every month. russia was forced to respond to calls for help from the east. ukraine began a special military operation. it's very short. if you know, yes, look, some very important reference points have been mentioned here, we must clearly understand that, well, the operation that began a year ago led to a long-term strategy, a long-term one designed

for a decade of the western world. it all started with the destruction of block sef, the warsaw pact was such a very important milestone. here is the budapest memorandum, from which it is being assembled like this, look. what did the west do to us. we have removed weapons from our territories, which guaranteed us a certain immunity under the promise that no one will impose sanctions and will not touch our borders further. i remember those reports very well, how we cut our soviet tanks, sawed towers, sawed everything , destroyed ammunition, that is, in essence, the west's strategy was to disarm our territories.