we must clearly understand several important reference points that, well, the operation that began a year ago led to a long strategy, a long one designed for a decade of the western world. it all started with the destruction of the sef bloc, the warsaw pact , such a very important milestone was the budapest memorandum from which it is going like this. look what the west did to us. we removed weapons from our territories, which guaranteed us a certain immunity under the promise that no one would impose sanctions or touches our border further. i remember those reports very well, how we cut down our soviet tanks, sawed towers, sawed everything , destroyed ammunition, that is, in essence, strategies. the west was disarming.

our territories of our states, and this is one of the military security, one of the crowds of sovereignty, so an inexperienced state, in fact, which only appeared on the world map, was deprived of this stability, and then everything was very simply chosen, the state that is really powerful in terms of population. yes, but in in which there was an internal split and this split was always there, it was a century, and they played perfectly on this and really. we must understand that this strategy sooner or later led to the armed seizure of these territories by the west. only the reserve has become more cunning, it no longer unleashes such wars as it once unleashed in vietnam. yes, and it turned out at home. a whole galaxy. today he learned to do. it's by someone else's hands. in this case, the hands of the ukrainians, i agree. uh, with the conclusions and arguments that were voiced and

military-political global and political and economic what oleg sergeevich spoke about in one frenchman, i will only add an ideological one. uh, the fascistization of consciousness, ukrainian, ukrainians in the broad sense of the ukrainian nation. e, it really began long before the special military operation, and even until the fourteenth year of the fourth, before the first orange revolution , they worked, of course, as a supporter. uh, the white radio company saw it with his own eyes, and uh, the most interesting thing is how, uh, the kiev authorities of different times justified this fascisation. well, first of all, they said what happened to the baltics look there. there, citizens who are not citizens, there is a revived cult of the ss legions and nothing, they say, happens to the state state, it lives normally and is accepted in europe , and we will be accepted . giving an interview to the president, though not in

the frame, and behind the scenes, he said that you understand complex states in terms of the language of bilingualism from the point of view of federal devices. well, they don’t take the european union into nato, they don’t take simple ones. that is why it disappeared was destroyed. yugoslavia is a complex large state taken in parts. so viktor andreevich shchurchenko said, my task is to make ukraine become mono and ethnic simple one language one vira one army one idea ideology state. then my elite, together with ukraine, will be taken to nato and the european union. maybe i am saying anti-western, but how can that be? do you really think that russia will come to terms with the fact that 40 miles the state will coexist with it with nazi ideology, and the anti-russian russophobic ideology will coexist with it viktor andreevich then honestly said that we will make every effort and

force russia to reckon with the fact that its gas pipes will be eliminated to protect ukrainian citizens in nato uniform, and that’s all . these are sub-slogans of the freedom of democracy. i want to remind you that the west comes to all countries to liberate peoples, but at the same time not a single people has received freedom. if we take ukraine, i am far from thinking that ukrainians want to fight all their lives they want to die, they want to starve, they want to suffer, supposedly they are fighting for this, the baltic states have not gained independence, and not a single country of the post-soviet space. where pinned, the west did not work and a bit of suicide, of course , that's it. you correctly said only about what was the goal for a mono-state, a mono-ethnic state, to become part of the european union, it will end all by the fact that there will be no new states or peoples, and there will be no one to join the european union about the peoples . ah, well, it's been simple since 2014. uh, in any case , everything in ukraine should have ended

with an armed conflict. it was the goal. the west doesn't matter. whatever period this happened, but it would definitely happen. russia is very patient. and in general, including us, we are very patient. they were waiting for a generally peaceful resolution of the situation in 2014, when ukraine was divided into east west. there is international law. the fundamental right is the right of peoples to self-determination, if a part of eastern ukraine has declared its right to be a people, to be, decide to understand with whom a they carry out no political cultural policy if we lived according to the rules of international law, yes, and when international law acted, they would be given such an opportunity and there would be no military operation today in ukraine, it would be those republics that were would be part of ukraine, but which had either its own complete absolutely free e-policy, as they saw fit. well, this did not suit anyone, because i will repeat it again. eastern ukraine western ukraine without no one needs eastern ukraine, because

all the main natural resources that are needed today are concentrated on the territory of eastern ukraine. therefore, i want to say that we were introduced along the same path. we have already told you that all the masks have been dropped. eh, already and the medal are crooks. here are these runaway queues or with a white fascist, and in an interview. i'll just say one moment. i want everyone to remember this moment, and this moment is often forgotten and not paid attention to it. after all, even at the moment when everything was kneeled, and it was already beginning, but a military operation. yes, and there was a referendum on the territory of the lpr and the dpr. yes, there was an opinion of the people. what kind of people decided that's why the opinion of the peoples, who then came under the control of the kiev regime and the people involved in the will, products. what is the violation of the law? yes, the holy alignment has determined where the right of the people is. mi, but

i, again, i want to project onto us again , i want to say we are great, so the way. remember these flirting, these flirting with manna deceit, that we are with the russians, and these questions fluently, like you and here they are. eh, you think reform for a very long time, right? good nationalist alexander the fruit of the reform plan , then they quickly published it, because the indignation erupted immediately from them, a large large number of people from these coup d'étatists and uh, the medal is already uh, they established the nazi, the nazi slogan of the hitlerites. uh, the already fugitive cook said that they would have left if they had left the dkb. remember, e. well, of course, the state is this is an old narrative that they erased two with what they said for up to a year that did not exist such plans. and what she said this week is mediocrity, who does not know a single language, she said the russian word, not our choice. this is not the choice of our bochkov grandfather and grandmothers. this is

not the choice of the belarusian nation, the man said. this is the seam she is under the criminal president that she is lying. here's a man who lies all the time . here's a swede. yes, she kind of went into politics and stated that they wrote to her, they breathed her out there, but they tried to deceive russia and our citizens in august september. and she said that putin is wise now she is in change the blame. and then they just wanted to, but the team was there. same evening. this is a nationalist nazi to the core in the wound. he was always russophobic, and then and now they simply deceived him. although i remember the interview of and the latvian, by the way, to russian channels and the same evening, which was ordered like this. although their ideology stands the guys haven't changed at all. they just covered up. now. she says that the russian language is not her

choice. what language does she speak with her children? is she in russian? of course. matte and now bustle, but you need let's just say it straight. she loses even the remnants of authority. here in this circles. look, what a discord is going on there, what is going on there at all. they got it again from a dusty box in an old one. and it feels like they didn't even change their clothes. they took out naphthalene, shook it off, put zenon, and it appeared that he says sveta should be in prison. they are fighting. why are they fighting, they are fighting for money for the heads of these whites, because each head of these emigrants, it costs money, my friends, what is more terrible is that there is no no geology. not the palm we're talking about. not the protinus. if one is a fool, then the second is just a traitor who, for the sake of power and money, will say today and against putin tomorrow for putin the day after tomorrow, what else is scary? they say what they have been told, and now in

politics and in the future in our construction of ours. we must take all this into account and now we take it into account when we change the legislation, when we introduced the entire belarusian assembly, when we adopted a number of laws aimed at developing civil society, because it is more terrible than people without the ideology of faith what can you be sure about it. prankker do you remember recently called this belarusian former singer, who lives in moscow, stole a fur coat by last name, shirt, offered to head ours in moscow. she agreed right away normally. leading you know the elements that andrey evgenich spoke, which we all say is the rejection of the russian language. yes, they all broadcast in one way or another. this is a conscious policy. west of the anglo-saxons, first of all, to expose russian-speaking people as outcasts. it doesn't matter if you're russian, belarusian, or you're just the same tatar who speaks

russian in russia. yes, he also knows his native, this is tatar, that's not the point. for what? this is all done to expose the outcasts, but they will not succeed. for one simple reason, firstly, russian culture is self-sufficient. it can even exist under such pressure, and secondly, their logic is based on a mistake, about which president yushchenko told you to force russia, so if you think to force russia, you are already losing in advance, because it is impossible. you you are wrong. i don’t think that all of them are corrupt, they didn’t speak purely. all of them are andrey evgenievich never. we do not say the word all i am even from this top. i think that the same franc ideological consent is brought together by french nationalists or nazis by racism by russophobia and yes , it’s no coincidence that radio liberty, yes, they almost

put up a literary monument, but they ate the nazi one, it’s on and they make him get acquainted, a military and hromada diet . uh, hours of another real war. well, this is nazism to refine consciousness. i want, i want viewers to know these are the statements about the fact that russian language is not our russian language not ours five or six years ago i can be wrong. well , about five or six years ago i flew. if i’m not mistaken, amsterdam is next to me near brussels, i was not a very famous person back then and they didn’t know me all the way to minsk at the transfer airport and quite famous people, the belarusian lightning, flew almost in amsterdam. uh, uh, vladimir niklyaev. here. i just remembered the name, i found aleksey yunukevich. remember such, yes, and even three people more pure russian throughout throughout.

uh, boarding the plane on no longer flying visit the name duty free uh passport control, shouted to each other. we didn't hear smiles. that's what they laughed at and said to a friend. look and these people, belarusian nationalists found a lot of these great nationalists in the vastness of russia , who, by the way, were processed by a bartender, and we know in which theaters they, by the way, work. yes? yes, but the scar is here, yes. and you and i. here you mentioned the lettuce, and what they didn’t know, but the lady knew about his connection with the belarusian popular front, and therefore, let’s be frank, when he returned from the words they didn’t want to. he wanted to be a minister, he was not appointed to any ministerial positions, but we tolerated the system as elerant. yes, these are all the following points, and about, uh, this whole ideology of them. we also allowed them

to actively participate. hold up your ideas. now this. at the vessel, and where was his souvenir shop located at the police school on masherov street was this center of his, that is, after all, we conducted, by and large, social experiments, showing incredible in belarusian, they seem to be shady, trying to negotiate with them, and working according to the rules that we received in response to an attempted coup d'état. the same analogy goes for a special military operation. russia is not from the age of 14. and since the fourth year, the fourth year, the orange revolution everyone knows that the real yanukovych won was forced to hold a third round, thanks to which yushchenko's attention to severodonetsk is going to the congress of the south and east of ukraine, which makes russia refuses to support him in order to preserve the integrity of ukraine, and so on and

purposefully work gradually as healers. as a result, people come to power talking about the russian yes, you, that under yanukovych, on every website of their ministry, there was an eu flag hanging ; under the yanukovychs, i was in kiev the ministry of foreign affairs, the very centers are a specific area, in my opinion, yes, the flag of ukraine is huge, this is under the yanukovychs and the flag what pro-russian european union, and tell more? alex something else yes, the fourteenth year russia from 14 year patiently tried to achieve with us. belarus, as an intermediary, the implementation of the minsk agreements, big scandals, than the kiev delegation did not, in the end, expect the people to vote, see poroshenko goes to the polls. what program does he come from, the program and the world in june he is elected president august is active, people have chosen zelensky. let's do it again.

we will endlessly repeat just because he is a russian speaking jew. from krivoy rog from the south of ukraine made a career in russia that is he had the so-called pro-russian electorate behind him, what did he do? he immediately said that the minsk agreements were almost a national betrayal, and even began to include poroshenko and the third force that would stop the war. unfortunately, things got worse, so what about what he said? i want to draw a parallel with belarus, here it is. well, yushchenko mentioned. the fact is that throughout our history, we from ukraine have been trying to carry out the same scenario, belarus, if we take yushchenko scarves in 2004, remember dressed, if for the sixth year our radical opposition, led by melikevich, was dressed in scarves and sent to the square. the only thing is that it is a strong state, we removed it, but in parallel the same and after the elections. what happened to this scarf, he traveled all over europe to sanction the nag and decide some kind of there, i remind you

that recently milenkevich, in an interview with a propagandist there, said that he lost. uh, those elections and the same results that they were really reflected, the way voted the people remember how many tent cities stood on the square and imposed sanctions and sanctions against belarus, they themselves admitted that on the basis of false facts , sanctions were imposed against belarus. fuss, by the way, also said in an interview recently that he then lost one gate and these will say. if they remain, of course, e in history in history, you know, here we are just really. i agree with vadim frantsevich, it is necessary to repeat and repeat, because young people do not know about it. some of them were even born later than the fourth year, and already in the next elections in belarus they will vote. and this must be understood, this is really very important, but we must already get used to that thought, let it go. she still holds us, that we were deceived, we were seduced, but we were deceived.

we tried to look at it in a normal human way in a slavic way, yes, but it turns out, no, this does not work in the western system of values. and so, proceeding from this. well done, lukashenka, who always lived with his own mind, proceeded solely from the interests our state and our people. this is what we must continue to do now with the whole common society, well, more or how before the twentieth year they tried to recruit us all, then alexander grigorievich told something like this. well, no, i didn’t use such terminology, but alexander grigorievich didn’t tell about the same, but bolton told yes, yes, yes, how he recruited or like alexander , for example, here, grigorievich of the union of journalists arrived. uh, we should once hold a competition within the framework of the eastern partnership. uh, among the journalists there east partner. well, as if it were a sacred contest, why is there no 15 minutes of conversation at the end they say , you know, we are still very worried. here, how

would you turn off russian channels, too . the main trip. yes, this is exactly the kind of rhetoric i had at a meeting with the e fiona with the e-americans with the french and so on, and the french ambassador of the cdu was fraying. we knew that he was grinding restaurants here, you know how many journalists. eh, asking them. e. and how is your situation, and if the government changed, would you support or e did not support. who is weak link? who is prose? the dance asked our employees, as a rule , at the same time, what you say, our activists ran, who you remember fought, even at gas stations, russian television went in defense of statehood only in return for what they offered us. and if they wanted a belarusian tv channel to be broadcast, or forcefully broadcast ont, they wanted that american russian agenda. most importantly, you can protect anything. history shows that it all ends in a lot of blood definitely a lot of blood. i was in vitebsk

and they told me that the trucker was alone. and this is such a normal electorate. these are men of working professions, when it began in the twentieth year. it was after, and uh, it was talking about these satanists, uh, protestants, these freemasons that were in the ranks there. e state revolutionaries. you know the names of these people, the franks, and so on. they said, we would arrange for them here. would you show them the ban on the russian language and so on, how did it all end? remember. here are the ones who are now on trial for extremes, of which they are trying this here technology is not an extremist. yes, there or those who leaked data, a mother of two children and a member of some kind of fascist movement, a culturologist. yes, and here they have the same doshkevich , remember some language on the market , extremists came there, uh, from a white-red-white t-shirt, with a chase they made a remark to him to figure it out. remember we have barbershots open. yes, they came to figure out how dare you, in honor of the chekists to name they

provoked what they are now discussing on their e, fugitive propaganda resources. that is why the belarusians are somehow not such ukrainians, they are aggressive on the maidan, they ask everything, but will there be a civil war in belarus or will they not. although they are not afraid of war. they call her, they discuss with them now the main e, their main path as they consider victory and return. belarus is the path to power , and they do not discuss others in practice , they think. here zelensky’s ukraine is winning and the ukrainian army will come up and attack belarus, and now they are most offended. why is zelensky not meeting with sweden? why bidens spoke and mentioned that belarus and ukrainian tv channels were there and so on, yes, because there is not some kind of conspiracy. this is fascist consciousness. culture. cancellation - this will be part of fascism. so they

canceled russia in belarus and they don’t give a damn that you are tikhonov’s there, when they took several people from the sense of this kolyanovsky into their service, we know. how many of them we know exaggerate their numbers by 10 times, for example, everything is past what you said that they are waiting for some kind of victory there and then, according to the half-clinian kind, no there or how many people are there, they are still very worried that it is terrible that belarus has not yet bombed its oil. yes, they experience it every day. why doesn’t it work why the poles don’t attack, they want blood , and even if it doesn’t work out for them, this blood for them, this drawing into the war is money. this is their political longevity, even for the duration of the war, millions can be spent during this time. they are looking at zelensky, they are looking at podlyak, an arrest officer who was put to death by millions. they are needed. recently, yes, uh, i watched ukrainians that discussed. they also discuss a lot about belarus and attention to such a thesis appeared, they say, well, when this belarusian government returns the property, then

the state property is privatized, and we must help the belarusians do it. look here. well, uh, we are talking about the fact that america stands behind many things. although great britain is also there , here we recalled a little british. well, mostly british projects. it was an attempt to destroy the russian federation than they are now dreaming of. uh, spokesman china's foreign ministry wars in india made a very interesting statement to the chinese nothing. he doesn’t say that, just in case, he reminded them, when they talk about the russian federation, what america has glorified over the past century in thesis, what you understood, listen to the history of the united states of america america is the largest producer of war, considers china the united states did not fight. in just 16 years of its 240-year history, the united states has initiated about 80% of the armed conflicts in the world since the end of world war ii. they are now say that this is the first conflict. e after world war ii and unleashed it , russia, the united states most of all violates the sovereignty

of other countries and interferes in the internal affairs of other countries after the end of world war ii, the united states tried to return more than 50 foreign governments. states are cruel. they interfered in elections in at least thirty countries and tried to kill more than 50 foreign leaders, and the us warriors against afghanistan iraq and syria led to the death of more than 900,000 people and 37 million refugees. we heard it while it will be. america's militant tendencies in the world will not continue with the hegemony of the us germanist policy with horror in the photo of biden in warsaw with the children with whom he surrounded himself. the only thing to take pictures with ukrainian children killed in iraq went. let the kurdish children say thank you, libyan children are syrian children, but it’s easier for him to stand and do these tomboy shows, so, in all their american politics, meanwhile, the statements were made by both putin and baidan. uh,

the russian federation suspends the validity of the treaty on the reduction of restrictions on strategic offensive arms. let's listen to putin. that the west is directly involved in the attempts of the kiev regime to strike at the bases of our strategic aviation, the drones used for this were equipped and modernized with the assistance of nato specialists. and now they also want to inspect our defense facilities. in the modern conditions of today's confrontation, this sounds like some kind of nonsense. come on, vladimir vladimirovich sent dahi announced about what they come out. well, what is fraught with in the first place, but you can expand your nuclear arsenal, firstly, yes, secondly, you can place it where you please. or am i confusing something like this, the fact is that the contract has lost all meaning. let's recall what a treaty on the reduction of strategic offensive expression is, a whole system of treaties has been developed since

the late sixties, which regulated the procedure for developing the use, and preferably not the use of nuclear weapons. this also included a ban on missile defense so that there is a mutual threat of destruction. it would be holding back. well, except for two regions, one in the soviet union, one in the united states is a treaty on the non- proliferation of nuclear weapons. this is an agreement for the same, these are gorbachev's times for not testing e in any environment, and here is the pinnacle of the entire treaty on the reduction of strategic arms even before that was e, a shorter-range medium-range missile. this is the last crisis of the cold war of the eighties when we stood on the brink. here are the collisions nato and the warsaw pact. what is the absurdity? in addition, just think about it, yes, it means that the americans do not allow russian inspectors to enter their own territory. yeah, but they demand from russia and when she refuses , they raise this issue in every possible way in international organizations, and openly.

they say that they are striving for the destruction of russian statehood , they practically do not hide the fact that they delivered this blow, including on airfields, but also what putin was talking about. this is an important factor two nuclear nato countries france and britain they are out of of this treaty, like china, yes, like china well, china is still connected there with the number of gods, but we will not talk about that. in this case , there is a confrontation between nato's sleep, and france has the entire triad of nuclear weapons. so what is the meaning of this agreement, but i want to tell you that in the russian federation, in all seriousness. a revision of a whole series of, uh, treaties and agreements, which concern not only weapons, but also membership in international organizations, is being discussed now. look at the boorish behavior in the obse. why is she why? we need this organization without russia and belarus, this organization loses its meaning . what the hell is he doing there?

canada only because canada participated in the second world war on the territory of europe until recently, even though the brigade was not there now, in general canada what are you doing there in europe when you go to direct insults and russian and our diplomats, the organization for security cooperation in europe if we 'll get out of there. well, find the difference from the council of europe, how no one needs it, no one will need some organizations, but not it's just bad organizations. the situation that has developed in the international olympic movement. it does not suit anyone, not russia, not belarus, not china, not very many other countries. these are issues related to cultural cooperation culturally. what cultural exchange? if we send you our exhibition? tomorrow you can arrest her and declare to me the law a and how and a number of other issues, therefore the united states, their minions are destroying the entire system, not only of the post-war world. some of these agreements have a longer history, so we saw the circus from

the european politicians of the nazis. it means that they behaved. well, not just ugly is the meaning of an international organization, when it was created, everyone should know this so that people from different points of view can hear each other, if we don’t want to hear each other, why meet, but plus from yesterday’s speech, for example, the belarusian delegation. i saw. which, despite the opposition, despite the insults in europe among many deputies. now the belarusian speech and our the voice was heard extreme. let's listen. yes, we have a video. the prologue of the special military operation that is currently taking place in ukraine was the expansion of nato to the east, which was accompanied by the deployment of offensive weapons. today, more than 30,000 nato soldiers armed with offensive weapons are concentrated near the borders

of belarus. belarus also remembers well the massive bombing of peaceful sevsk cities by nato aircraft. i don't know how else you can implement a memory that works on the principle of remember here, but don't remember here. nerves of steel vladimirovich necessarily club editor, well, the latvian forest brother, e from the pro-nazi latvian regime. uh, swearing in relation to the russian federation. we return to the times of soviet diplomats of the twenties of the cold war, when they endured and now the legendary diplomacy of the great country was tempered in such situations even worse, so i wanted to add about what is possible, of course, it’s to go out everywhere , slam synchronously to the door, and, as it were, leave all possible international organizations, but why go out? need to get out of there?

what hurts them, or rather from there? what exactly will bring them some pain, so russia did the right thing. she left the cis announced her exit from the cis, we left eurovision doomed. it's a pain big turn. and why, because immediately a little bit, a different rhetoric began on the american side, they began to talk about the need to somehow solve it. or maybe it’s not necessary, because but just the same, russia’s withdrawal from start-3 hits the americans, because the americans start-3 - this is what it is certain quantity. uh, warheads, i'm right , i'm not a military man, yes, that should be, huh? and uh, as far as i read from many military experts, they say that america is not capable of producing these warheads today without russian uranium. yes, therefore, when russia will do this in quantities that will not be controlled by the united states. the united states will not be able to respond in kind, and this is scary for them. that is why i say

that when we talk about withdrawing from any international treaty or some other you need to calculate and determine exactly what will be at the point and hurt the moment adding. when you go out, you need to understand what will happen. here's a war, for me a little, as it were expressed here, such as about vladimir putin's speech. he practically didn't mention the soviet space after he didn't mention it. and yet, russia, as the leader of this space of ours, should have a program for the development of the post-soviet space, attention riveted to russia not only within the country, but also from the outside, a concrete example of bologna how many times already says the bologna process, again we did not come out ourselves, we were expelled. although there were constant talks about leaving, yes, that's right. thank you, lord, yes, but what we are creating here is the same huge shanghai cooperation organization in russian ownership. we need to create our own educational space so that chinese students come to us. this means that we should have

common standards with china, india, iran, and with other countries with whom we can potentially cooperate, that is, these exits should to make us not weaker, but stronger only educational, but also a lot of other points, on which we are now already in the journalistic sphere in this regard , some strategic things should be built. here are the new spaces. you’ve already posted, let’s say, when all constructions end, if they tell the truth. none of the western politicians was delighted that putin made such a statement that participation in this treaty was suspended, stoltenberg said painfully. let's hear it's dangerous situation for all of us, if president putin wins in ukraine we must understand that this is a war of choice. this is a war of aggression. the russian side that invaded neighboring ukraine and ukraine of course has the right to defend itself. we are members. nato is, we all have the right to support ukraine, and that is exactly what we are doing,

of course, as nato we are supporting ukraine at the present time. we are taking a step forward. even more. we have more modern weapons. we have consultations with ukraine on various types of weapons. well because how to make sure that all systems of all weapons work as they should, because you need to understand that this is not only about providing new systems that provide. artillery armor zenit on missile systems that have already been delivered no all the necessary spare parts ammunition maintenance fuel required for operation let me remind you through the audience that this was the head of an organization that since 2001 has killed 900,000 people. well, according to the most conservative estimates. yes, after the words. here, uh nato benseca, remember the words of lavrov than a more long-range weapon system will be delivered to ukraine by all russia will be forced further from its borders to move this danger away other words of lavrov but they

cannot be in line. they cannot. here, too , the russian federation is behaving extremely carefully, adhering to all those norms of agreements that are in force at least within the framework of the united nations after such words. be. uh, russia has, uh, the same principles and the same approaches as nato has in the united states of america. any smoke , any group means separatists who are in line of sight with the american military base, which more than 600 were supposed to instantly receive russian armored weapons of the eptura. e for war with the hated american regime or the nato regime. this would be a symmetrical answer, but russia , i repeat, behaves with extreme restraint and adheres to the provisions of the un charter no other documents to finance or provide weapons to various unrecognized regimes. one remark. why did russia

see it this way? because it is a state. but lithuania, what did the president of lithuania say at this week is crazy. i can't say about him. he says let's go to the red line. let's move on, the president says. elephants that do not solve the conflict that he so asks, he begs. let's not have a big war in lithuania in 20 minutes, how can a politician say that, and russia is responsible for the whole world today, therefore, someone was expecting more harsh statements from vladimir vladimirovich putin from the message, because he took every word of answering and speaking of the future. eh, in general about the future of our countries. i agree with vadim france yet, but i heard something good for myself, especially in the economy. in my opinion. here are the words of the president of belarus, he was held by the electoral program of the ninety-fourth year. and the fact that we must create our own import and substitution, that is, on the contrary , create our own import substitution and they heard him, and today putin spoke at a message with lukashenka's program

for 94 years. how the soviet space should be built for me is much more a plus than the right, because in the way fuck russia, who won when? i am 100% sure of this. to be honest, i agree with you. i also heard putin’s speech, a lot of theses of our head of state over the past five years and even ten, which are constantly repeated, as it were, and now, well, putin’s words at a meeting with our president about what we managed to save. uh, post-soviet legacy soviet legacy post-soviet for the period refers to industrial enterprises, which are now very uh, two models are needed. here, i look, uh runaways. uh oh some of them, such yenkos were always worth that they were accepted. they say that belarusians represent a nation of cowards, because belarusians are those who survived the conflicts , hiding somewhere, well, some kind of nonsense. we are the heirs of the belarusian partisans, we are the heirs of the reds on february 23. yes, this is our

belarusian holiday, because the belarusian communist detachments on these dates, at the behest of the belarusian national commissariat, created by josi. fami vissarionovich stalin near petrograd, stalin's defense of soviet power, here. we the heirs of these e people, they are some kind of so that they say that all of belarus was spending independence, sovereignty there, well, they themselves live on the money of the polish vilnius. you saw how they are lithuanian. you saw how they rejoiced at the biden. the owner came to space, he watches tv. now i'm political scientists say that there is a belarusian model of russian statehood and not only in words. here we conducted courses on the history of the belarusian statehood. they introduce we teach political economy. they are considering this moment even in education. this is important laws, respectively. and putin's message sounded a very interesting point. we

are well aware that the economic model. uh, our social oligarchic russian is different, so putin has taken a step towards rapprochement. remember what he said about the legarchs today for russian society. it is important not to profit from the sale of natural resources from above. there is something else enrichment of some units, yes, and here, in other words, you did for the motherland how you develop your native country. and this one here the thesis that lukashenka has been resounding for all the years while he is in the grip of other theses. if you listen, you can hear and see. i would return to my thesis that the best antidote for this e from the absorption of belarus from the collapse of belarus is our complexity. here is a complex state in a complex, for example, energy system, it is difficult to build a nuclear power plant, but it is necessary, because

the nuclear power plant on the territory of belarus has its own. yes, it's a complex system. but this is a guarantee of our energy security. political system in which a new representative supreme body appeared all belarusian. people's assembly. it’s difficult, of course, it’s difficult, because we are going our own way, but this is the foundation of the belarusian statehood, the party system, which i now know, and the party of aleksey sergeyevich announced that it would hold an extraordinary congress to re-register the committee of bey rus and not the party of the republican council . but i saw the norkotitete in russia, but now i meant the liberal democratic party went it's a pity we only got our parties confused. now it will be less, the only thing that it must be brought to a legitimate normal existence. so any

education system. take the journalistic environment criticizes the policy of our multi-vector approach. what is the difficulty, it is the difficulty of building relations simultaneously with the united states with the european union with africa with china southeast asia of the russian federation being simultaneously in motion not joining the sco euroset is difficult, but complexity allows us to maintain sovereignty it is difficult if you are not lukashenka well, by the way, the difficulties are very different, they say the west is not exactly the same. but still europeans communicated with foreign diplomats. that's how they try to deceive something there. something there is some sense americans, by the way, are very simple. they are primitive. uh, i think that's how pompeo talked to the president. football directly so quickly means, come on, you father come back, yes, that's all. this is american style. by the way, it often brings them, uh, some kind of fruit, but in our region. you see that, to put it mildly, they get far. we also talked there.

let's so you have films transferring it, we give everything for free. we have the media that produces all this, and we will simply replace everything for you . yes, close the russian. i say no questions, let's show your films. only you at home they they said the funniest thing. they said, no , we don’t have state-controlled media in america, it’s very funny, we have different ones and therefore it will never work out, you know, because really these are very different values ​​that are inside us, uh, a little humorous. now literally a couple of minutes is not necessary to discuss, but you can especially the second episode. well, uh, andrey sergeevich said about the fact that they suspended, yes, the membership, yes of the ancient uh, russians in uh, in the union of journalists. uh, what would await us, yes, here are the democratic liberal fugitives , lethal portosevics, the court is now going on and tells a lot of interesting things once again. he said that he worked in vilnius at the headquarters. this one is

actually true. it's just a signboard of the headquarters of completely different people, controlled by so protosevich was forbidden to criticize the headquarters of svetlana tikhanovskaya and mention other competing politicians, except for some other initiatives. uh, well, the second is sometimes makarov who, as we know, including russian ones, live in their fictional world of not education, ignorance, not propaganda. uh, there is some kind of dissonance when their ecosystems get them, the same thing happened to a well-known propagandist for such a scumbag and there are fakes to blow. you know, blogger, kind of independent, but funny. we know about it, for example, how it is all financed so he asked in a conversation with one person. and by the way, from what here the bud is also there. yes, he started, why aren't they joking with him? well, the man explained it further to him, dud was very surprised. let's listen. why has no one tried george bush jr. and why is he not considered

a war criminal for the same reason, well, the us is permanently a member of the security council , these initiatives can be blocked at any moment . don't admit it either the jurisdiction of the international criminal court and, after the cleansing, donald trump imposed sanctions against the chief prosecutor of the international criminal court, who initiated the investigation, and he even sanctions crimes against american soldiers in afghanistan. well, that is, the americans do not recognize international investment, like do not bother us. that is , when we say when the russian authorities. we say, uh, i focus on international experience. they often say so, but there is also a reason for this. they come up with almost nothing, and then again there is question and these people teach e russia to live. they

are so easy to catch on inconsistency, which is what russian propaganda does with great pleasure. so you can heal friends. today they said that the americans are not allowed to visit them, but the russian bases must be checked; the same with the elections ; and if this is an american election, they can cast a president to stand up and pray. for bloggers of a multi-millionaire, this discovery was nikolai ivanovich, who told me how the question was first raised that she had arrived all were cured. yes, wild americans say, i mean, why watch us? as an osce mission to us. he says? yes, you are a member, the americans members would now pass, he says, let's come to you for the elections, as for the choice to us. well, yes, you are a member. yes, here. let's all observe and you are told, they have been there for some time in general

, they had no idea someone would be watching them. as a result, some two people agreed there and the conditions were 100 meters from the site , accompanied by the police, they did not ask anyone for documents not to look. well, here's to you elections, when they even delayed observers were the same news, when the presidential elections, i will remind you that these are all organizations. naturally, with the omission, of course, once the soviet union and the warsaw bloc. i don’t know if it was possible to change something puppet, everyone knows, starting from the united nations organization and ending with just knew that we would touch on the topic with a speech. let me remind you of our osce diplomats. and that the observers of the osce, neutral organizations of the secret, supplied the ukrainian military with intelligence. they didn't actually work. information received from a surveillance camera. all of it was transported immediately to kiev so that they could monitor the actions of the troops, e.g., in the dpr and russian e, military convoys were detained

by an employee of the osce mission in the donbass . one goal tells that he came to collect information about dangerous food enterprises. the situation in the dpr and from other functions that are not characteristic of the osce, which he performed on the words of video information, in general, the mission. the quotation was not controlled by the video surveillance system was completely almost in kiev data from cameras with a contact line went only to kiev, immediately there was its own team that analyzed this data and then gave out the result, in fact. is this the organization of the block. uh, nato but once a number, why was it created? yes security and europe this helsinki is one of the brainchild. you are right, the right of the soviet union, including the diplomacy of the loud brezhnev doctrine, well , they turned, yes, they trusted and signed a guarantee agreement. e security of borders. there would also be one more surprise for the dude signed an agreement where, after the military border, there were unbreakable questions, where are the czechoslovaks, where

is yugoslavia, where is the german democratic republic of germany, where is the soviet union, where is the promise not to expand the military infrastructure? turnatu once again emphasize. it began to expand even before any geopolitical aggravation , moreover, and this aggravation was a consequence of the expansion of nato's military infrastructure to the east. if at least one international treaty that the united states has not violated itself. well, there probably is. yes, yes, the budapest morandash, in general, scammers. in the truest sense of it. e words on words even there are no documents. uh, but in the meantime there are such good bells and besides from disturbing attempts. the west to isolate russia has largely failed, according to the material published in the newspaper. oh god. here it is just a quote. a closer look beyond the west shows that the world is far from unity. well, in the sense the rest of the world does not want to support. uh, nato translation yes, the conflict has revealed a deep global rift and the limits of us influence on

a fast-paced, changing world order. it's good. the second special operation separates. west from the rest of the world since the announcement of its - this is euronews e, tells the quotes of the interviewed people. it was also asked why they think the us europe supports ukraine us uk europe respondents mostly thought it was about protecting ukraine's democracy or its own security, especially in europe against the latter. however, people in china, india and turkey are skeptical of these statements. . many believe that kiev's support is driven by a desire to maintain dominance. west i'm glad that, well, it comes. yes, even notorious such as the lies, who collected 500,000 delivered. take trump. he is directly related to america. biden rides around warsaw in kiev at this time, the man-made disaster in the united states was well promoted. he went there to the people and people say where is our canoes. why is he not dealing with the problem within the country. he traveled even before it became

known, kiev and wrote while this sleepy joe there, i am traveling with you americans and will always be with you. and do you know anything about democratic is justice standards? west yes, for example, let's take the pentagon, if you have a screenshot, yes, the first screenshot, it is signed like this , the muscle of moscow's strike on ukraine's energy infrastructure is a war crime. well, the second screenshot of the american bombing of a hospital in afghanistan is not a war crime reads, the pentagon standards is so right. it's so convenient. yes? well, this is the decision on the way out of this treaty. what is fraught with this ? will it remain only a statement or in fact russia is now a dangerous period. eh, this nuclear risk management. this pumping up ukraine with weapons, all these belligerent statements - this is an increase in escalation. putin shows with such a step,

guys. stop because back in the west a strong opinion is being formed. and by the way, their role should not be underestimated there. they are puppets , but nevertheless they work more specifically for this. duda is the same lithuania, but this statement. let's move away from the red lines. the same ukraine zelensky regime of russia that russia does not use nuclear weapons should not be underestimated their opinions, because they are considered specialists in russia and they are not attracted as independent politicians. namely, as those who, well , understand something, you understand? i saw putin here. he's a slave. they're the same you worked. there so how is it with them, you know many of the administration. they here it is not like the president of ukraine about this quality, he says, will not accept putin shows. don't joke, medvedev is trying to treat him somehow frivolously, but it's the deputy chairman of the security council who marked these uh lines, if you start some kind of large-scale offensive and now you will have such a

critical mass of weapons in the direction of ukraine russia in the direction of crimea russian territory, guys. this border is the 24th military doctrine of russia, where the procedure for the use of nuclear weapons is written. we are approaching this point and russia is flagging this neatly. russia is actually accepting yet another attempt at containment. does anyone like these aggressive aspirations of the nato countries or not? a no good life does it on the other hand, russia articulates and demonstrates its own determination and excellent experts. yes, you, by the way, very correctly said they are considered experts. well, these comrades are hardly experts on russia, because hmm , they cannot understand the logic of decision-making that exists in the russian

leadership. and today. we must clearly know that the russian federation is able to build up its nuclear strike potential. what did putin say about the fact that russia can use nuclear weapons to increase russia until it is exactly not necessary. look, everything is so very good it happened there, as they say it should exactly, yes. it can be seen that this is how it is. why because not only did russia say and hurt, well, leaving st-3, and right there, china quite clearly defined its position. he and here is the statement that was released today. or rather, a plan for yes consisting of twelve points, as far as i understand, yes, for the peaceful settlement of the conflict in ukraine , if you read this plan, then we also read that

china has very clearly defined its position, and it will go hand in hand with russia, that is why, by the way, alexander lukashenko said during an interview with chinese death. what the president said now without the opinions of china is not solved at all, it is impossible even to solve a single problem. uh-huh, he said and actually announced the president of belarus, this plan . uh-huh and which will be made public. and this is the china program, watch the whole year. they tried to persuade china, e, to move away from russia to retreat. yes, balancing for whom? accept the leadership of china, you yourself identified china as a threat. apply officially. come on russia we will now deal with it next will be, uh, you are on the way and what, what else did the president say in an interview china makes any of his statements, unlike the west , uh, everything. having calculated. it's not these american shows that he gave the example of balloons. yeah, uh, that would be a really serious offer. uh

, put on the table already in world politics and it will not be possible to ignore it china must be present. yes, you need to listen there, if you want with the chinese, then the americans do not want to. they are all stupid here. i do not want to upholster the lithuanian people. these are our friends, simple people are fools of politics. well, like the americans. here we considered the first point, it was necessary to end the real integrity on this, and the reaction of the americans says what these officials say that they don’t want peace, they don’t want peace, which means that now we need to chat up the chinese proposals to find in her critical links. and you offer something other than supplying it weapons. and mercenaries. you are not suggesting anything to fight fight fight fight. china suggested, but they hardly

want to listen, but they will be very scared. when there is a threat, personally to them. understand when already in their house will be able to prioritize. and how would that be with the last statement they say that they can. if anything, here, then there will already be some steps on their part, mikhailovich, to your previous question. why did you publish, say, an article in your post? yes, because they do not have monopoly, because there are excellent media the people's republic of china who interview our president, there are africans who broadcast in english , there are arabs who broadcast in those key languages ​​of the european union, they do not have a monopoly, so they are forced from time to time even in their media to publish the truth. now, if there weren't all this conglomerate, free alternative thought. they would tell us, as at the end of the soviet union, about democracy. wind change freedom and so on. in this sense, i sing of the complexity of the belarusian media market, which presented by the beltian radio companies and

belarus today and the world by the modest news agency minsk, the news of the belarusian dumka, which vadim francevich, put on his feet , made a magnificent thinking magazine. part of the big media empire knew it was fair to say that the opposition media flourished here as well. uh, their editors used to come to the editors' club. this stopped after they began to receive, quite frankly , money from abroad to overthrow the state system. we hinted at it , i told them about it on the air. they are still they were indignant that we were running into if we press, what now turned out in white-bearded, how much money did he receive? how much money they brought the radius of freedom and the euro radio to the cyclist, they were supported abroad. and that our officials did not flirt with them. and that he they felt it all seeing. and that we weren’t there right up to the ministers , who thought that, well, the first interview, you need to give a white one, she ’ll wait for these yes, that’s why you came to them

you brought them to the fore when they began to feel, almost the owners, when i remember well, well remember the situation. uh, dryly, there was a problem. there, people opposed the construction of a shopping complex next to the church. the republic wrote that state television showed zero reaction. only here the bike, so he wrote the same one, they came from the district administration. now this will not happen, firstly, the state media has become toothy. see. how many issues, including uh, are raised? secondly, we see, uh, and this is the demand of the president, that officials began to listen to uh, the opinion and position state media, they began to understand, and i think that if someone began to calm down to read, well, the situation, here it is , will change. no, the belarusian media is the level to which they have risen as a result of the struggle of the twentieth year , they will definitely not get rid of it, but i am sure that our

state apparatus will also. e should work in the same mode, a little more experience in the newspaper, gadyukevich is, therefore, you are getting here, until it is registered. you understand the most amazing thing is the logic of action. here are the ones you were talking about in one frantsevich, exactly repeats the logic that is used by the western world in terms of information processing. first they flirt, and then it's the state, yes. in powder, of course, and the next one, like a pipe, goes to the same swing, they told a lot. eh, how do they work? information from the inside and we will definitely tell you more. follow our program. see what an independent press is. i think that you will be shocked, we are completing our program and, as always , some entertaining news. eh, here what was in the obse is hysteria. i think that this behavior of this latvian is hysterical, and the pseudo-deputy is hysterical,

things are bad with them. i think this is my opinion. they are exactly yes. that is why such a reaction. well, in general, they have been sending something to each other's psychiatric hospital lately. here is the statement, the prime minister. estonian prime ministers of estonia kloss quote nato countries should establish control over moscow and forcibly rewrite the mentality of russian citizens so that threats never leave the russians again. she was answered by meps from ireland mikvah wallace reacted crazy take over the hospital, god help him in his mouth. this is the first time in a week. well, the second arrived psychushka and sent the head of the ministry of foreign affairs of slovakia, e, the head of the slovak foreign ministry rostislav shook, and the war in ukraine in social networks and condemned putin's carpathian collaborators and sent the hungarian example of urban, i can't quote you, but believe me, it's just three letters. this is an obscene word, and wrote in his facebook