[000:00:00;00] but this one transfer, even in 2 days, is enough to understand that today the topic of security is the number one issue and listen, in the main western countries, ukrainians talk a lot about this these days 22 23 24 25, be sure that something terrible will happen. here is your prediction. this is another such hysteria in order to continue to pump up the heat and what is already overheated or true. it’s worth tuning in to something serious ivanovich we see that ukraine has lost the initiative, in a strategic military operation there are special military operations, and that is why you need to invigorate your forces and invigorate your means. here are the agreements that they allegedly reached on supplies. they have different weapons. uh, biden's visit to kiev is everything from this opera, therefore, in the near future, in my opinion, what should be expected is

that the shelling will intensify. donbass, e, the territory that is under the control of russian forces is the territory of russia, in my opinion it will, that is, take a clear course towards the escalation and continuation of conflicts of some kind objectively, there can be no changes; there are no forces and no means. they have in order for radical changes. in the near future, in the coming days until spring, if it’s possible that your data is really something, the day after tomorrow it’s already exactly one year since the start of a special military operation, so when we assume that it could be worse, probably already nothing can be worse than war, because there is still and unfortunately, judging by the rhetoric that was chosen, and the nuclear powers still have a couple of terrible options left. well, taking into account the fact that hmm, the kiev regime consists of lakes. naturally, from my point of view, some kind of surprise was not in store. eh,

the russian side, indeed. uh, like my colleague said? there won't be any progress, because they got bogged down in positional warfare, but some kind of hmm direct action, perhaps even on the territory of russia we won't count them. these are predictions of a pure society, the opinion that we live in an information war. and in times of thousands of fakes every day, so naturally. these dates are always key are used for informational confrontation for pumping up for waiting every month for us some date, something will happen, something will happen, second. of course, by this date there may be some provocations , some actions in order to again use them in the information space, which is the anniversary of what we did. this is the third, but at the same time, war is not fed. unfortunately, many people have such a date in their heads, everyone gathered, went in one day. something happened so there is no

war. it's a hard war - it's a long war. this death war is a tactic and no one e acts in one day, not in an hour, therefore, i do not expect something beyond global, but some kind of provocation on this day is quite possible , given that by 23. he is the twenty -fourth some plan is supposed to be voiced, uh, which ukraine calls peaceful, taking into account the fact that china, in its conflict with the united states a for global dominance , is going to present its peace initiative and very, uh, is clearly going to present it. these are big prerequisites for the fact that something before it should be. well, plus everything, as always, we should be ready for anything even in not very large operations, because a not very large operation of stupid people in an information war can be inflated to any scandal due to exclusively information technologies, so the appearance of high-profile informational occasions these days is very -very

likely another question is what they will carry for uh, even a short-term perspective is not necessarily. this will be at least some development, but a high-profile informational occasion can happen. it is in these conditions that we discussing. e issues of national security. on monday, the president had a meeting of the e with this security of the republic, belarus, and two very important areas were discussed and interesting this project, an updated concept of national security and a new people's militia for belarusian services. here, if you look at what caught on the most, what caused the greatest resonance. and here's what we noticed. this, of course, is these words of the president that the belarusian peacefulness is not a synonym for sacrifice immediately the message is that every man should and not only a man should be able to handle weapons in order to protect at least his own family. and what caught the eye

of many. well, what uh in the vein of the discussion of national security touched on the topic of values ​​and traditions. that is, it is also around the discussion of security topics, but at the same time everything, and our concept will be open, that is, anyone, including from abroad , will be able to get acquainted with it. but alexander ivanovich, what is the main thing you note in this new document about updated here it was clearly stated that 70% of the concept is er, it's updated, but its structure is nonetheless. she has been preserved the same as the current one, she answers. most importantly, the four most important questions in terms of security, what to protect against what to protect? where do i defend and what forces and means to defend this is all clearly their current concept, but in my opinion. eh, if we are talking about a project and a very important statement was made that this is an open concept, these are

fundamental questions. it will be submitted to all popular discussion in the coming time. uh, this is that there is a new quality of content, we know that national security is a state of protection of national interests from internal and external ones. but the goal is added in the project very clearly for the further progressive development of the belarusian society, that is, the goal is clearly traced further. uh, if we answer questions. what to protect against threats? e in the project e, the concept is clear, marked types of angle risks, challenges and direct threats. that is, the stages origin. this is the risk of the stage of formation and development - this is a challenge and a direct threat. this is what exists for e. society and protection is needed.

speaking of spheres, the biological sphere is added there, uh, and i won’t specify for everyone. it’s clear how many epidemics we have experienced over the past decade , episode and uh, various challenges and threats, including those that include laboratories. yes, around our country in the post-soviet space, but they talk about national interests. here you are, too, in your prelude on this issue, they noted that it very clearly emphasizes the fact that such concepts appear in the strategic national interests as the ideology of the belarusian state, patriotic education of the people in belarus as an object of protection. and this is all connected precisely with the goal of ensuring national security. and in general. if we say that it is very important that our country, its originality lies in the fact that once we wanted to be a bridge between the east. and the west, and this is a strategic goal and we still have it, but today's current situation. it says that,

unfortunately, in this situation it is necessary to be able to find e, forces and means in order to develop in our society in our state. uh, i'll just finish a second and, uh , specifically, uh, strategic national interest. we need to note that only if every member of the belarusian society deals with issues of ensuring national security, then our national security will be ensured. everything is rightly said with every word of consent, but people are watching us tv what they want every belarusian wants to live in peace so that there is no war, so that there are no terrorist attacks in the country, so that no one sways the situation to live calmly and develop. by the way, the europeans want this document. this is what we are discussing now, this is the concept of national security of the law of the people's militia , the most important thing is that it comes first from life, and the real conditions in which our country lives now and the second, you can write a million documents. he's fine the most important thing now is over

all these years, especially last year. we are doing everything for national security, that is, we are strengthening it, and why should we do this? again, you want peace. always be ready for war, and the president spoke about this and met journalists halfway. and here is a clear parallel example. eh, with the great patriotic war, someone did not understand her. for example, i understood very well when the ussr was chattering for many years and they said, we will never attack you , there will be no war, the president said more such mistakes in belarus, for example, no one will ever will repeat. we don't threaten anyone. actually. we have never laid claim to any territory. there was and is no aggression on our part, but to believe in fairy tales that you do not threaten us. we won't be anymore. we will also discuss, probably, in the nba this is russia , we did not threaten who our main threat is more. is there is the united states of america is there? ukraine that's who he is the number one threat to us, i would, most importantly, the threat - this is

internal stability in the country, no one from the outside will ever win belarus. here the most important thing is to strengthen, what we are doing, the internal unity of internal political stability. now it has really strengthened, because sorry no enemy, never destroy us. and yet, a colleague will say a lot about this and speaks and speaks correctly, see the informational oleg sergeevich. here we have poland , which is like such a distraught jock. here, uh, asteroids are driving communications, they are pumping up muscles. if it goes on like this, she'll drive herself to cardiac arrest. we have closes the borders. we have the united states of america which belarus for the first time introduced us into its concept of security. more ukraine. well things. that's what the poles are now pumping up weapons, what they do not do at the border, polish lilits do not think about one thing. if they drag the whole of europe into a war, they won't succeed. so poland, for example, got involved, belarus. if suddenly they

would have succeeded sometime, that it would not work, and they and someone would serve time, then there would be no more. an hour later, no one understands from polish politicians and, for example, the lithuanian president, who said, let's move on to red line. he does not understand that in 20 minutes there will be no lithuania. it's just this language trick who is the chief doctor for us, poland. uh, the polish people are not our enemy, but poland itself is an aggressive state that today threatens our national security. and we say this openly, we warn polish politicians about this, that we will never tolerate it. we see it, we watch it, and we have something to answer. why am i asking this question, because from year to year, until the twentieth year, we talked about the fact that we are peace-loving we are, and so it is, but with all this, if we deceive ourselves and do not clearly designate for ourselves, somehow the same americans are an example. they say we have russia we have china belarus they fit in hostile. here kolomoy should be kept in mind as enmity. yes

, it means hostile, but here we must also take into account that politics is a little more complicated. that is, we understand this general trend that we see. we must understand who, if anything, is within these countries from themselves . quite right. i will talk about the information component, when the issue was discussed, including on the people's militia. i had one question, and is done on the tradition of our ideas. the message, from which it is assumed that everyone will protect their home, and based on this, the overall national security will be strengthened accordingly. i have a question, taking into account the fact that in the global information space today there is a clear message from the west through culture through the media through and new media about that individualization, i would even say

atomization. a person within society is a positive process, taking into account the fact that saving oneself and everything will be fine. as a last resort , you can move to new zealand and when this is promoted very, very much for a lot of money. how much money will we spend on ensuring that our correct traditional other values ​​​​of protecting the home of our family of our hearth will be present in the information space. this is the main question, in my opinion, because we hope that that unchanging our traditional values. unfortunately, they are under direct attack under and they are just under threat. they are just trying to shake this base, and returning to poland

, polish politicians think very strongly what to do in the autumn elections, and taking into account the fact that they know very well that the current party, law and justice in the autumn elections will be opposed by non-russians. not in any way. we will not plan them in germany through uh, tuska through uh, the same swabians, and so on and so on, they need to submit as much as possible, and a vivid image of the media. no matter what means, so today to grow up for the voters for the domestic market, because they can not boast of economic success. they cannot boast with belarus, then what effect does this have, that is, there are those in poland who support this in every possible way. look, closing the border. they denote an external enemy, an external enemy is always for internal use. hmm, not only on

an external enemy. you can always find internal enemy and say you are against the fight against external enemies, which are expressed in the closure of borders. it means that you are an internal enemy against us. this is for internal use yesterday, if it goes back to putin's address, and he clearly divided the western elite, yes, our enemy. biden personified, that is, even more clearly in his address, putin was looking for our enemy. giving too big vague definitions for the enemy today means not uniting this weak association. here, if everything is clear and personified. yes unfortunately today, with such simple things, you need to work with the audience, it comes faster. it's just that through the information process the effect is more than one. that's just the nuance the border was closed. they as soon as arrived. it is still in front of the outside

public for america poland has named its national idea for the upcoming elections. he said more america in europe everyone heard it. just think, poland will protect the usa in europe. this is completely surrender, national interest and the border was closed , it is correct to talk about information issues. a byte arrived and shows more. we ready to close the border for everything, to do anything. look at me. what kind of great poland, we're going to collapse everything in europe. this is preparation for the elections - this is information technology, but on the other hand. unfortunately for me and all belarusians, this is the surrender of polish sovereignty and independence completely for today. this ruling polish elite is not independent at all. she is completely in her hands. listen objectors more america in poland it means first of all in europe yes it means less germany it means less than france and the uk is no longer in

europe and not in the european union as a result of the british project for the cross-section of germany and france that meet their economic needs from russian resources. it is exactly the same performed in poland, the external markers and their internal interests have converged. at the same time, one and the same message works perfectly for an external audience, like a connection with america with a big strong friend, but it works the same way inside poland, as the most important thing, yes, the poles are the first. the main germans are not germans, if return to the concept of national security and the second issue that was discussed they are closely related. this is the people's militia. why is this a fairly new phenomenon for us? as you can see , everyone should deal with security, so those who are in the unarmed forces are not in law enforcement agencies, nor in state bodies. uh, seniors are handicapped with

skills that can u wield weapons and fight. that's what the people's militia, that is, uh, in every locality. eh, there was an opinion here. here i read in the press that it is in the villages and in the cities. it will be the same, especially the protection of public order, some public functions of the fulfillment of life, it will not stop there. yes, on approach. if uh, god forbid some kind of conflict will arise armed directly to the front line. everything will be clearly regulated there, there are military administrations and everything else, and somewhere in the rear. maintain public order, public functions, well , sabotage and reconnaissance groups in counteracting the identification of their e, preventing facts of looting. here we see even an earthquake. in turkey, there were factors of looting at once, there are different people . therefore, these functions are in the first place, therefore it all acquires a national character, but it is necessary to lay the regulatory framework for organizational conditions in order for this to work immediately. we sat and thought,

how can we implement all this, how can we get it? whom and how to make it all work. well, belarus declares and always wildly its neutral status of m.i. we always really, as they said experts want to live in peace harmony with our neighbors. and well, taking into account the fact that the ring around our perimeter is now shrinking , in fact, uh, all countries except russia. federations have become unfriendly from lithuania to ukraine, then the best guarantee of independence of sovereignty and such neutrality, of course, is the best guarantee is appropriate training. and here i recall the example of israel , which is also in a hostile environment, therefore, there and uh, they took such measures, including, as the service in the army

of representatives not only of men, but also female, but our western partners. they just don't leave us a choice. we must follow this path so that, as oleg sergeevich correctly said, be ready when, after this chatter about reconciliation, they try to strike. and we will be ready for the second question. and why don’t we say one more thing , it’s important who said that there are no people in belarus who want to defend their country themselves, i travel around the country. i will tell you that there is a request. it’s just that we sometimes orient ourselves on the internet to the opinion of some hipster, whom zybitskaya drink beer and it counts. that's all the belarusian youth is not true, go to the outback and talk there. i'm not saying that everything in this direction is good, but willing people who want can defend their country and want to learn this and be in this people's militia. this is the second point, of course. every man should be able to defend his country. these are all countries. now they understand

differently. there will be no military security, and the third moment of this is reassuring. by the way, i will tell you people far from the army, far from the special services. they, when they don't know anything. and when you don’t know anything, what are you afraid of, that’s why the weight of the components is informational work, what my colleague says explain explain show say and the second moment, when he delves into it even with the help of these collections with the help of teachings, these ones that are carried out in the regions. when he comes out of there, he understands how it all really looks. and myths are collapsing fakes and a person is already starting work the other day we saw that there was a meeting of two presidents alexander lukashenko vladimir putin it is clear what they were discussing questions. there mutual security joint security. it was based on the peace theme. look at the trade turnover under 50 billion, 80% of the implemented allied import substitution programs, as if specifically to show, look, we have a global agenda, but it was very clearly visible from the foreign journalists who

spoke with the president. they convey the mood of their own, and politicians and their regimes. uh, they have this question endlessly. this is the president's answer. they're through one anew request. well, when will belarus enter into e, war in e ukraine. why do they want it so much? why is this topic for them it does not hear the answer. they still gave this informational story. yes yes. well, no matter what the belarusian president answers, anyway, i will ask exactly in fact , this is not the first time we see that people come here not to hear answers in order to ask a question in our space. after all. in front of him in front of them in front of everyone now in front of all the western media here i am i don’t like the word “all by all”, because this is a very big generalization, but in front of all western media whatever they are, even the american republican democratic ones are faced with the issue of the information presence of control of someone else's information space.

today through the institute of chief editors. these media are promoting the idea of ​​confrontation, what is good for americans in confrontation not on their own territory, yes , to everyone what is good about the constant presence of the topic of war outside their own field in a foreign information field, yes, they come here to convey to everyone we don’t have tension, in order for everyone to bring nervousness with their question, because they are well aware that yes, they control a certain share of space, a very large one too large for an external factor in new media, but at the same time they know that they are less present in classical media . yes, they have such a way out, they meet with the first person, whom i trust here in order to express at least a brief interrogative manner their dishes, runs from

an uncomfortable question, turned around and went on autopilot. and let's listen. how the president replied that they were ready to fight together with the russians from the territory of belarus, or that only in one so far it would be better if at least one soldier with a gun came to our territory from there to kill my people. this applies not only to ukraine. this also applies to our other neighbors, who behave even more inappropriately, if they commit aggression against belarus , the answer will be the most severe. the most cruel and the war would take on a completely different character. if the meeting of the president by journalists were indeed shown in all european tv channels on american i now fantasize. i understand that this is a fantasy. but it would be the effect of an exploding bomb, because all this spoon that poured on the ears

of the europeans is still pouring that belarus is some kind of aggressive state. it's all collapsed, because look, it's coming. maidan kyiv biden. he talks so much about the war. if he wanted peace, he told you, it wasn’t him 3 days ago , i said here back, he would have said what he came out and said from four in the evening today, as i am in kiev, not a single rocket will fly at donbass i'm in minsk 6 hours in the palace of independence, everything is alexander igorievich. lukashenka putin flies there and we started, but in the world they showed aleksandrovich one showed in europe an amazing fragment. now i will definitely ask you and i to look at it, then we will continue , of course, to discuss it there . journalists. he approached our military and asked and showed in his reportage. if you have to fight, you

are ready there amazingly, just let 's hear the answer, i don't know. well, and , accordingly, they fully confirmed their template, which, in fact, they are building wild hordes from the east since the time of tolkien, yes, which will come and gnaw. give money to the americans. they will cover us, we could show and we could show something else, but they showed exactly the one, uh, why they went for us, we didn’t like it for our perception. why we will gnaw for us, right? this is also an obviously sarcastic moment of the subtlety of the language, and for a simple english translation

, let's eat it. come on, you have a radical connotation. why is this moment torn out without previous dialogue? after all, this is clearly not the first question that has been asked. yes, the same journalist who is doing an interview with the president now has 7 minutes left of his not the first day, working in a structure that was at one time, but created in order not to take notes during the interview, because he already knew that he said everything was written. and why the borders are being closed here sounded, but i added, because we conducted a visa-free regime and for poland, when tens of thousands of citizens come here, they see what is happening here, that the economy is developing peacefully, people’s eyes are burning, because they work for yourself and your country. and they have prospects for normal peaceful prospects. and when they come, it's all 10 times more, because there are relatives , familiar friends, but they closed the border and

the militarization of poland continues. eh why? e it's very important here. uh, a special military operation in ukraine because our fugitives answer why do western journalists ask such a question, because they bet on the defeat of russia and then they will take on belarus ukraine is strategically important, and belarus is five times more important than, uh, ukraine here here is the answer why western journalists ask such things. oleg sergeevich touched on the topic , after all, several times already about the fact that the president invited biden and indeed many immediately turned into a joke that the president is trolling biden. here come, but it seems to me that i just agree with alex sergeyevich, many were confused, because this is the shortest way to restore the bloodshed, and on the ukrainian front, we are well aware that this is never in the interests of the united states of america even once. and that's why they told the presentations about it. of course they won't,

but still. it wasn't trolling . and what does it mean to be ironic, if on our land in the same palace of independence, e, the signing of the minsk agreements took place? i don't i think that the chancellor of germany or the president of france, uh, is less in status than the president of the united states, so, of course, president lukashenko proposed the most uh. hmm , the shortest way is the easiest. e, means, e option of the decision of questions. after all, it would seem such a complex conglomeration of how to figure out how it means that expert groups work, some councils are not government organizations, but the key is e, which means that in peace negotiations lies precisely in that. is. yes, uh, so, uh, invite the instigators of this conflict initiator of this conflict. these

are the anglo-saxons, in particular the united states, because the kiev regime is controlled from the outside and we will not repeat this evidence for the hundredth time, it is too obvious, respectively, president lukashenko as an experienced politician with, e, a brilliant instinct. he suggested the shortest way . biden arrives, putin arrives, they shake hands, they discuss , they draw something. yes, they agree. in no case can this be viewed through the prism of irony, this is a real option. here, yes. and you'll see, when sooner or later, then this the option will be implemented, because all the same, probably, the superpowers will negotiate. well, maybe it will be electricity . lukashenka heard in the united states of america the other day, who commented on this. donald trump said that putin is president? there would be no 24 hours of war. let's listen to what arguments he accompanied everything. people i literally on the same night as i recognize my pobeda, i will call two people

who know who putin and zelensky and tell them. we need to meet. we'll meet, i guarantee i can work things out. i i know exactly what to say to them, i will tell this one to the other the second and i will tell you to better agree. we will conclude an agreement within 24 hours. but we offer the initiative, and trump is her father. this suggests that this initiative is absolutely sensible and pragmatic, and it can really ensure peace between the two countries, when european politicians begin to lie that there is no way to peace now lukashenka understands everything perfectly, realizing the situation shows once again. it's all this way it's simple. you just don't want to go through it. that's all. that's the truth let's continue the conversation. so, finally, we are trying to understand, after all , for whom biden came, and who needed this meeting more in kiev. come with

us. and we continue the biden in kiev, uh, we were surprised. we were definitely not surprised. yes, i probably uh, i was not surprised, because the biden had, but one chance to ride in an agai, and walk there in the polluted yes american polluted territories. and at least try to explain something to trump's root electorate. as a matter of fact, it goes, yes, to people who do not earn very much, and then they will also live in the contaminated territory and their contaminated water could come. yes, as long as it's not in aha, that's the trick for him. it was presidents' day in the usa. well, that's the official name of presidents' day, he could spend it either with his electorate, huh? where he

gets the most points. he did it, his electorate looks at, uh, foreign policy , or he could spend it with a republican who is not with the electorate specifically at home and get a hat. he weighed and weighed not the most, then he decided to decide his headquarters just where he can get better press better and bigger press. he was able to get in kiev about what , in fact, and there was no need to look for two options. the only question was whether he would get the same good press from warsaw. yes , he would most likely get yesterday's press. e last. well, the first comments after his speech said yes to the people. it went in, because his speech was built on the simplest repetition of what was already known without overworking, plus there were children at the end. the children were chinese not speaking, well, typical ukrainians are great. yes, it's a sign we're working in

sign system. we need to get used to it. sorry, let's get it. if we need to get used to the fact that we work simultaneously in e, the real plane and in the system of signs. and if now the system of signs gives more points for some of the politicians, he works with the system of signs. what does this mean for us? here, let's practically conclude, i absolutely support the sign system of symbolism. we see that in general western culture is involved in this. not only, by the way, western, yes, and what symbols should we then use to generate new or lift from it is our choice. and this we return to the first question. do we want to create a new symbol system? or should we really invest in promoting traditional values, sadly it sounds, but the simplest things. i, we are the mother of the world, that's what we

wrote in cursive there in schools in kindergartens, the first words that we drew. now all this works not through words. it works through images of emotions. yes we need to come up with new advertising that would appeal to the younger generation when you they started talking about the fact that the people's militia will rely on adults even, well, there, and even the old people yes, that's right, but when we talk about the example of israel, the example of israel begins with what the example of israel begins with the fact that everyone knows that they will go to army at a young age of kindergarten is quite right and when the first political magazine is designed for a younger student. this is fine. yes, it is necessary to work with a younger audience and yes, through the language that they have, maybe it is not necessary to come up with a new value system. need to invent a new language, the language of images, the language of emotions. which would now be perceived by a young youth audience

, which would give the effect of trump when he speaks in short, clear words, he, when he speaks with politicians, he uses longer words when he speaks in public space. he defines short words biden tries, knowing that he speaks badly tries at all silent silence reduce. everything in the system of views is tense, or and so on. yes, it sounds funny, but they work through emotions in order to to involve young people, among other things, one moment is not the first time, the united states of america stakes in solving internal problems on external factors. so was the centennial visit. biden. this is another business visit. listen to me today ukraine and europe are the main source of income for the united states of america this year. they've made millions of dollars and they want to make millions more. i came to watch investments, so that everything would spin and spin , launched ukraine to the last ukrainian.

fight came to warsaw, get ready poles before last pole. close borders. come on, choke. we are the money he will come to the white house and tell the representatives of the military-industrial complex. how many more contracts? how many millions? how much more land will they take? how many businesses is money. now i absolutely agree about the meaning, for example, watching the speech of the president of russia, i was more interested in the non-military component, which was mused all over. and what's the point? what are the meanings? what are the new prices you are benchmarks for development within russia will be coming decades, because it is important for belarus because we are the union, i have heard many. uh, many paid attention to one more such moment, and i will ask the directors. show this video, and zelensky his facial expression when he met the bideno. well smiled, they hugged each other, but when the bilateral and extended meetings took place. look at his face. it is evil. and this

anger. he cannot hide, and many are now wondering what biden could say to zelensky that the president of ukraine has become gloomier than a cloud to say or say, because i think deep down zelensky understands this little circus and the game that he himself plays. and when he sees that in fact there is no experience, all these beautiful words are not for zelensky, zelensky is like steel, ukrainians are like steel. well, does he really not understand in the depths of his soul that they promised me to use the planes. uh, common words for all requests, as americans know how to communicate, smile from ear to ear, of course. everything, let's see. tomorrow after tomorrow. and how will they do it? i will only look at mine interests only on their own interests. and there will probably be a lot of words, but the effect of the visit of the us president turned out to be not the one that the kiev regimes were counting on, to be calculated on the american one. yes, there is naturally. on the inner surface, it is more

to provide, e, additional financial military assistance at a rate, primarily fighters. maybe, uh, it's no secret that the ukrainian regime is negotiating to drag him in in some uh way. uh, at least some kind of nuclear warhead, yes, in simple terms language. just some kind of tactical nuclear weapon. at least just place it in kiev . they think it will be insurance. i don't have such conversations, but what about these victorious reactions, what do they say? here the baydyn hugged zelensky well, you remember how he, uh, hugged a korzai from afghanistan, and like uh, three weeks before fleeing afghanistan, that means, uh, a telephone conversation took place with the president in the next afghanistan drive. and biden. said what it means to support america and afghan democracy. she is unshakable, and after 3 weeks. the afghans were already hanging on the chassis to escape from this very afghan democracy,

so uh, so, uh, everything is strategically clear. they need a meat grinder here. here they need a regional war for the americans and they need us to be involved, that's not just the americans, and i'll just support it. you can continue. uh, the munich security conference is essentially a manifestation of the fact that no matter how we talk about the west, they are united in their anti-russia in this project of theirs, and risha sunok, the shortage of weapons among the european members of the atlantic alliance is not should cause panic, the depletion of europe's military arsenals is not a problem and the main argument. as he explains it, they were already intended against russia , well, uh, stoltenberg nato secretary general in the alliance is not as afraid of the third world war as russia's victory in the conflict in ukraine, that is, we must be perfectly aware that we see what happened in munich it should be cut into quotes and within. here. uh, that active brisk information policy that we

need, as i said. gleb means to show it on all channels, because it's not easy some score of russophobes. this is some kind of hateful person's score, hateful ideology, what they said there does not fit into the head of a normal person and a european. that is, uh, if you remember, the previous munich conferences, well, uh, sharp grin, they never bared it means that they put a lot on this war very simply before, you excuse me, i can’t help but say that you you know, for decades we have been trying to change the government in russia and they say so, and this is belarus standing nearby, and this i saw everything with my own eyes, but so far it has not happened. let's think about how they are now using the situation in ukraine and change the government. this is what all people should know. that is the price of democracy by choosing freedom. we say it, sometimes people don't understand, some listen to the macron, listen to the ball. when lexus and vovan called him, and he openly said that this is a gray area. it's not the people who live there. this is

our territory, let's figure it out. that's right. you know what's alarming is that they loosen their tongues like that, it says that they still confident in their victory, they are the bank. they are precisely because to speak like that to the whole world. uh, it means that they spit on diplomatic norms, that they use negotiations in order to deceive partners, that the arsenals were already intended for russia. that is, how can this be explained? this can be explained by the fact that their current operation. well, excuse me, i'll get in, again from my side, maybe not in time for their current operation to be quickly completed, because at the same conference in the fields, they met with the vans. and they are with him behaved completely differently, because they know their senior desks. nyor, right now he's scratching his turnips and thinking it's necessary. here's

something quick. win, because china will start next and china will start in full. china will start on the whole indian. the pacific region in parallel with this will begin the massacre for artificial intelligence and a conference in the hague. these february 14 military use of artificial intelligence was proclaimed with the filing of the us the same exercises in the arctic ocean for the first time in military fighter jets in the north of greenland this is all that they already see, and they are still stuck in the old war, they are still stuck in a war where real resources are divided. and they will continue to fight for virtual, so they are ready today. yes, they are ready for a quick victory here, because they have no other option, if they do not win quickly here, then there they lose completely sit down, there, uh, it sounded here that why

is zelensky so sad well, yes, sad sad unsatisfied let's put it simply, yes. eh why? i am my version i will express it, because what he wanted to hear naturally did not sound, and in my opinion, biden is also preparing for the twenty -fourth year for the elections. and what kind of luggage does he come with? and this is his trip to ukraine, what do we have, right? this is also evidence that he has nothing to show the americans in foreign policy that he has in his luggage. e about the munich conference. yes, there was a high-ranking representative of china, with whom contacts were supposed to take place before the conference, but then uh because of uh, this probe chinese, these contacts did not take place, that is, uh, the european european establishment has no idea what will happen next and china uh, the intrigue lies in the fact that there are no statements from him about what his vision

is for the continuation of this conflict, so uh, now i think that there will be the last breath of this collective west to pump up weapons in order to win quickly and win. if it means negotiate with china, isn't that a vision. china to you just in the fields in munich. conference - it was called many times now one of the most senior chinese diplomats. he says we are convinced about ukraine, we are convinced that this crisis situation can only be resolved through peaceful negotiations. this is the first - once , in the second - this is a message , first of all, to the ukrainians, some forces do not want peace in ukraine and their strategic goals extend beyond the borders of this country. that is, what we all said today, ukraine is not the goal. yes, this is just an intermediate step. yes, the fact is that the collective west is he sees that europe is still calculating two moves ahead, but the americans are calculating much further and any wars. no matter how long they

continue, they still end in negotiations and peace, therefore, if in the near future, they will be activated. here are these attempts to seize the initiative to achieve great success, for which in order to have more advantageous conditions for negotiating. that's the maximum they can hope for. uh, the side of the west sounded that you can’t defeat a nuclear power, so about a comprehensive victory, it’s possible for uh, our e oppositionists say that we will win in ukraine and take on belarus, but everyone who is sensible and objectively evaluates. they understand that there is no victory, because it will not be objective, there can be more advantageous conditions for the world in order to make peace and concentrate, including on countering china, because the us national security strategy china comes first, not russia and couldn't answer. normally, they could answer the question, who asked him, but listen, and you can

supply weapons to ukraine a. why can't i to supply weapons to russia, what's wrong with that? what is the difference borol tried to explain that this is different, but i think that a normal explanation cannot be voiced. of course, here is another question so that we can somehow put it together, here are different, but the opinions that were voiced today. in this program, when you really observe what is happening in ukraine, you try to understand how they came to such a life that it is clear that there are many different factors, but at the same time you need to understand that there is an important internal factor. at some point, they played politics, pulled, pulled, tore the state and poured in or demons of various stripes. the nazis we see now are tanks that drive with crosses. these nazi greetings, and the assignment of the honorary title of edelweiss to one of the brigades and so on, the west does not see this. why because he already played this card in the 20th century, anaha, it works well and now we are building a civil society. we continue

to build laws on political parties on civil society updated status of the air force this is how we can build our civil society in such a way that after a while it does not turn into a rupture. where, in ukraine, these demons will pour in, there are nazis, and we are somehow trying to replace them. the idea of ​​patriotism , let's pack into the idea of ​​patriotism something that has nothing to do with patriotism and some uncle across the ocean will tell us how and with whom to wage war. here is oleg sergeevich what we should focus on today is a very complex topic, but i will try to be very brief. the first is not to confuse democracy with permissiveness and lack of law and the absence of any rules in politics and in the construction of civil society. this is the first mistake of ukraine when everything should be democratic, everyone can be. so what if it's a fascist democracy? so what if this party opposes the constitution, they have the right to vote. this is

democracy and freedom. so what, they want to move to belarus to remove the russian language with the states to destroy the constitution, all we have done is democracy. this is the first mistake that you should never make, so that this does not happen, and the second error. this is an external factor to allow politics, ukraine first collapse. the ussr allowed it, belarus i watched recently. you know, this should be shown on tv . when i sit down, i can say it's okay tikhonovskaya sits and talks with the head of the 40 fund, and he complains, belarus is one of the first countries that kicked us out of here. so this is our happiness, thanks. lukashenka must be told to remove the external factor from politics forever, as soon as we launch them here, these funds of these diplomats who are sitting at round table, and we count them, as we have elections or before you know, we will try democratically to meet your standards. and you hear us hear

us end. all the collapse on the part of the two points is not to confuse democracy with the law, and the second is to remove the external fact, and then we will not allow this yuri to be created, the corresponding hmm mechanisms, and they have already been created. that is the first stage. here is the formation. it is over with the new political reality, that is, the law on political parties on civil society has been adopted all belarusian people's assemblies ended with a change in the electoral legislation. yes, the next stage is the next year, a reboot of such a political system, but in ukraine , uh, this situation. hmm, this situation did not come in one year there, uh, at least three decades, the entire political elite was decomposing , including because the means of production everything in ukraine belonged to the oligarchs. in our country , the means of production belong, er, to the belarusian people, and naturally the oligarchs

played with their puppet parties. here what they led to, by the way, raised very interesting figures, exactly a year ago , when the government of ukraine was discussing the budget of the verkhovna rada, it gave a certificate explaining the number of people living in ukraine and there it was. the number was recorded with the government at 35 million. imagine it there were 51 million. in the census in soviet times in the ninetieth or ninety-first, it became 35, which happened from these 35.5 officially there are now in russia five more in europe , that is, -10 and another 5 are not counted anywhere, but they also scattered all over world usa canada e latin america that is, now there are no more than 20 million people in ukraine, we are talking about why this is what irresponsible politicians led, who were, yes,

perhaps more attractive to the youth and went in, so we lost this information war on images. uh, so, uh, the russian side, but in the end, look what happened as a result of a belligerent country with a catastrophically low level for such a territory. the population and so, in order to prevent this, we launched this formation of a new political reality. and these are the laws they will not allow, the rules and procedures of the regulations. they will not allow such people as in ukraine to ever come to power. if two key components yes external internal policy factor and information control. yes, we allow, we can prevent politicians. all the more the same. uh, the fascists in germany came in a democratic way, so, and the first country that kicked out von soros on a grand scale was

just the same great britain, if you remember a little history, yes, you can. physically contain at the level of e system internal barriers of some individuals or political parties from being present in politics. it can be done by the other side until we control the information space. to popularize our images and we will not invest real money in advertising the simplest things, and then more complex things. we won't be able to keep the next next generation from choosing the bright empty tech-swept ones. buddy with foreign structures speaking different languages ​​and beautifully dressed and they will also have beautiful socks, yes, like a row. here we will not be able, we will not be able to fix

the political reality forever in a situation where no external force is able to quiet its man. if we are not able to control information information control, today the primary control of information based on the control of the emotional ee of the cultural ideological sector. yes, but the cultural informational one here is a very substantive arch for literally a minute, therefore, complementing our system of checks, contradictions , balances of barriers. we must take the best from these neighborhoods, because everything they do is in the information space. it's just brilliant. it was better that these quarterrs had money and komomoykov, whom he did not spare anything to take, no need for colleagues alexandrovich that could become our amulet, what tasks do we have. here we talked about tools

specifically to strengthen our society. if possible, say so in general terms, but no external influence can productive if there is internal unity, if people are confident in the future, if they have stability, stability in the economy and politics and culture and in all other and family relations, including, therefore, we have spiritual and moral values. speaking in a scientific language, speaking in a simple way, then you need to hear your people speak and always pursue a fair policy. what the president of our country has repeatedly said is the main conclusion. in my mind we're made of twentieth year. this is to modernize all aspects of our society, including the political system and those e, changes to the constitution that may have been adopted back and are now being implemented, and the entire belarusian people's assembly and the political party for the development and development of civil society are aimed at all this, including

the information component of the information safety. therefore, if we hear people react, then there will be no external influence. to what extent and whoever, uh, would not tie up under this, it will all go to sand. that is why we must hear our people and not only the authorities, which is located in the central organs. well, the district executive committees and village councils and collective farms and enterprises. yes thanks. thank you for your opinion, which was voiced in this program today. i thank our guests for sharing their thoughts on the events taking place. thank you to our viewers for today, see you in a week happily. together with our guides, you will learn something that you would never have guessed to google, one of the most famous names of the belaya vezha tower, although for

its white history. she never was. by the way, who didn’t know this tower is depicted on the five-ruble banknote of the legend , historical facts and many unusual sights when an arrow or a spear gets here. they slide off, change direction, and so on, the face of a warrior from more reliable protection in a head-on collision. really. such a blow was allowed, walking along the embankment you can meet many curious or legendary characters jack sparrow oh sorry captain jack sparrow , which will remain in memory for a long time i see a bison for the first time, they were born, by the way, this year. hi watch on belarus 24 tv channel. this is a show in which

there is humor excitement and dexterity, so that it is not excruciatingly painful and ashamed of the past years. it is better to be in our program to the viewers dr. is a model let it be. yes, god knows, right. well, yes, we had latin in the first six months. it should have been for a long time and it's not true that two teams will compete for the main prize and the title of being better, that is, the circumference of the circle is 200 meters -1. each of them is connected with belarus by its own

unique and unrepeatable history. that's when you leave everything behind and start from scratch behind your back. this is such a big push to overcome yourself to reach some new stage of your development. i hmm today, i am a member of the belarusian dancesport federation. this is our home, where we give our soul, our creativity, our talent

to belarus on our tv channel. live news briefly the topics of the issue shrovetide week is celebrated on forgiveness sunday. tomorrow the orthodox believers