she was even prepared for this, i trained day and night. i thought that i would get on my feet, when i got into the stroller i was afraid to go out, because everyone knew me and they poked a finger, yes, i went out at night. you see, my injury. this is a test of those people who were next to me and the fact that i live every day. i appreciate it because knowing that this can be bad. it's been a long journey. you know, i also got kolomieso valery kirillovich. there the guys are dancing in wheelchairs, we were doing rehabilitation there other children, and then i will feel that someone else needs me, that i can help someone else, he taught us to be in order, he taught us to be independent. not that someone owes us, because we got into the carriage, we are such ay-yay, poor unfortunates. give us everything. no, at that time we shamans found me, put me in a sled. just like not that

she was strong, but simply persuaded, and i couldn’t afford it, because i’m an athlete in my soul, my wings grew after the first olympic games. well, mothers are also four stuff, and then 10. steep descent next year will do that fine man. i say this everywhere, that limited people with

unlimited possibilities. that's for sure. i just ran, and now i have skiing and rowing and wakeboarding and parachutes so life is full. and it's not yet stop. i seize the moment today. everything is fine with my daughter today. mom is not sick. this is also a big deal, so the joy comes by itself. it's just not possible. everyone is sad without international competitions where you can't show yourself the whole point of the olympics is lost. but there have always been warriors, there has always been disagreement between countries, but, however, there have never been such protests, as now, and how will the world champion immediately feel, and the olympic champion, if he is not a chelistan, champion, among all, well, here it is the criterion of the very meaning of the olympic games is already lost. if there is a world to gather this,

let's gather the whole world. well, so that the whole team sweeps everything, but this is not right. hello, i welcome everyone who is now happy to see the guests of our today's programs in this edition. well, biden

then goes to kiev, warsaw makes a statement, by the way, nothing new, but nonetheless. apparently a very important message, vladimir putin’s message the day before placed important accents, of course, one way or another , we will touch on all this today, but this one transfer, even two days in advance, is enough to understand that today the topic is security. this is question number one. and listen, in the main western countries , ukrainians talk a lot about this these days on the 22nd 23rd 24th 25th, definitely something terrible will happen. here is your forecast. this is another such hysteria in order to continue to pump up the heat and what is already overheated or true. it's worth getting ready for something serious alexander ivanovich we see that ukraine has lost the initiative, and there are special military operations in the strategic military operation, and therefore you need to cheer up your forces and cheer up your means. here are

the agreements that they allegedly reached on supplies. they have different weapons. uh, biden's visit to kiev is all from this opera, therefore in the near future, in my opinion, what should be expected is that the shelling will intensify. e donbass , the territory that is under the control of russian forces is the territory of russia, in my opinion it will be that. uh, a clear course has been taken towards escalation and continuation of conflicts of some kind of changes, objectively there cannot be no forces and no means. they have in order to radical changes. in the near future, here in the coming days until spring, if it is possible that your data is somehow valid, the day after tomorrow it is already exactly one year since a special military operation has begun, so when we assume that it could be worse, probably nothing can be worse than a war, because there is still and

unfortunately, judging by the rhetoric that the nuclear powers have chosen, a couple of terrible options still remain. well, taking into account the fact that hmm, the kiev regime consists of lakes. naturally, from my point of view, some kind of surprise was not in store. eh, the russian side, indeed. uh, like my colleague said? there won’t be any progress, because they got bogged down in positional warfare, but uh some kind of action of direct action, perhaps even on the territory of russia, they, well, will not be considered. these are pure predictions. we are living in an information war. and in times of thousands of fakes every day, so naturally. these key dates are always used for information confrontation to pump up some date every month, something will happen, the second. of course, by this date there may be some provocations, some actions in order to again use them in information space that here is

the anniversary we made. this is the third, but at the same time, war is not a comic book for us, unfortunately, many people have such a date in their heads, everyone gathered, went in one day. something happened so there is no war. it's a hard war - it's a long war. this death war is a tactic and no one e acts in one day and one hour. therefore, i do not expect something beyond global, but some provocations on this day are quite possible, and given the fact that by twenty. he is the twenty-fourth some plan is supposed to be voiced, uh, which ukraine calls peaceful, taking into account the fact that china, in its conflict with the united states a for global dominance, is going to present its peace initiative and very, uh, is clearly going to present it. these are big prerequisites for the fact that something before this should be. well, plus to everything, we should always be ready for anything even in not very large operations, because not very

large operations of stupid people in the information war can be inflated to any scandal due to exclusively information technologies, therefore, the appearance of high-profile informational occasions these days is very, very likely another question, what will they carry for uh, even a short-term perspective is not necessary. this will be at least some development, but a high-profile informational occasion can happen. it is under such conditions that we discuss, a matters of national security. on monday, the president had a meeting, and from this security of the republic of belarus, two very important areas were discussed. this is an interesting project, an updated concept of national security and such new to the belarusian rumor people's militia. here, if you look at what caught on the most, what caused the greatest resonance. and here's what we noticed.

this, of course, these are the words of the president that belarusian peacefulness is not a synonym for sacrifice, immediately the message is that every man should and not only a man should be able to handle weapons in order to protect at least his own family. and what caught the eye of many is that in the key of discussing national security touched upon the topic of values ​​and traditions. that is , this is also around the discussion of the topic of security, but that's all, but our concept will be open. that is, anyone, including those from abroad, will be able to get acquainted with her. but alexander ivanovich, what is the main thing you note in this new one? the document updated here it was clearly stated that 70% of the concept is updated, but the structure is nonetheless. she has been preserved the same as the current one, she answers. the most important four critical issues in terms of ensuring security, what to protect from what to protect? where to protect and with what forces and means

to protect this is all clearly their current concept, but in my opinion. eh, if we are talking about a project and a very important statement was made that this concept is open, these are questions of principle. it will be submitted for public discussion in the near future. uh, this is that there is a new quality of content, we know that national security is the state of protecting national interests from internal and external threats, but in the project the goal is added precisely very clearly for the further progressive development of the belarusian society, that is, the goal is clearly traced further. e. if we answer questions, uh, from what to protect against threats? e in the draft e of the concept is clearly marked, the types of risks are challenges and directly threats, that is, the stages of inception, the attack, the stage of formation and

development is a challenge and direct threats. this is what exists for e. society and protection is needed. e , speaking of spheres, a biological sphere is added there and i will not to concretize for everyone, it is clear how many epidemics we have experienced over the past decade , an episode and uh, various challenges and threats, including those that include laboratories around our country in the post-soviet space, but they talk about national interests. you, too, in your prelude to this issue, noted that it very clearly emphasizes the emergence of such concepts in strategic national interests as the ideology of the belarusian state, patriotic education, the people of belarus as an object of protection. that's all connected with the goal of ensuring national security. and in general. if we say that it is very important that our

country, its originality lies in the fact that once we wanted to be a bridge between the east. and the west, and this is a strategic goal and we still have it, but the current situation is today. it says that, unfortunately, in this situation it is necessary to be able to find e, forces and means in order to develop in our society in our state. uh, i'll just finish a second and, uh , specifically speaking of strategic national interests. we need to note that only if every member of the belarusian society deals with issues of ensuring national security, then our national security will be ensured. everything is rightly said with every word of consent, but here people are watching us on tv, what they want, every belarusian wants to live peacefully, so that there is no war, so that there are no terrorist attacks in the country, so that no one sways the situation to live peacefully develop. by the way, the europeans want this document. that's who we are now we are discussing, this is the concept of national

security, the law on the people's militia , the most important thing is that it comes first from life, and the real conditions in which our country now lives and the second one can write a million documents. he's fine the most important thing now for all these years, especially last year. we are doing everything for national security, that is, we are strengthening it, and why should we do this? again, you want peace. always be ready for war, and the president spoke about this and met journalists halfway. and here he clearly spent parallel example. eh, with the great patriotic war, someone did not understand her. for example, i understood very well when the ussr was chattering for many years and they said that we would never enter the rise of the war, the president would say such mistakes in belarus, for example, no one will ever repeat. we don't threaten anyone. actually. we never applied. and on what territories there was and is no aggression on our part, but to believe in fairy tales that you do not threaten us. we won't be anymore. we

will discuss more. probably he is biden worth russia we not threatened who is our main threat anymore. is there is the united states of america is there? ukraine that's who he is the number one threat to us, i would, most importantly, the threat - this is internal stability in the country, no one from the outside will ever win belarus. that's the most important thing - this is the strengthening, which we are doing, of the internal unity of internal political stability. now it has really strengthened, because forgive more than one enemy, we will never be destroyed. and yet, a colleague will say a lot about this and says and says correctly, informational pension alexey sergeevich look. here we have poland, which is like such a mandatory jock. here , uh, drives communications asteroids, pumps up muscles. if it goes on like this, she'll drive herself to cardiac arrest. we have closes the borders. we have the united states of america , which belarus for the first time introduced more necessary thing into its concept of ukraine's security. here is what the poles are now pumping up

weapons, what they are doing, the polish lilits are not doing on the border, they are not thinking about one thing. if they drag the whole of europe into a war, and will not work. so poland, for example, got involved, belarus. if suddenly they would have succeeded sometime, that it would not work, and they and someone would serve time, then there would be no more. an hour later, no one understands from the polish politicians and, for example, the lithuanian president, who said, let's go to the red line. he does not understand that in 20 minutes there will be no lithuania. it's just this language trick who is the chief doctor for us, poland. uh, the polish people are not our enemy, but poland itself is an aggressive state that today threatens our national security. and we say this openly, we warn polish politicians about this, that we will never tolerate it. we see it, we watch it, and we have something to answer. why do they ask this question, because we have been saying from year to year until the twentieth year that we are peace-loving, we are, and so it

is, but with all this, if we deceive ourselves and do not clearly designate for ourselves as, like the americans, for example. they say we have russia we have china belarus they fit in, enmity, that's who we should be referring to as enmity. yes hostile means, but here we must also take into account that politics is a little more complicated. that is, we understand this general trend that we see. we must understand who, if anything, this is within these countries themselves . quite right. i will talk about the information component, when the issue was discussed , including on the people's militia. i had one question, and is done on the tradition of our ideas. the message, from which it is assumed that everyone will protect their home, and based on from this, the overall national security will be strengthened accordingly. i have a question, taking into account the fact that in the global

information space today there is a clear message from the west through culture through the media through and new media that individualization. i would even say atomization. a person within society is a positive process, taking into account the fact that saving oneself and everything will be fine. as a last resort , you can move to new zealand and when this is promoted very, very much for a lot of money. how much money do we spend on so that our correct traditional other values ​​​​of protecting the home of their family of their hearth, they will be present in the information space. this is the main question, in my opinion, because we hope that our traditional values ​​\u200b\u200bare unchanged. unfortunately, they are under

direct attack under and they are just under threat. they are just trying to shake this base, and returning to poland, polish politicians think very strongly what to do in the autumn elections, and taking into account the fact that they know perfectly well that the current party is right and justice in the autumn elections, non-russians will oppose. not in any way. it is not we who will implant in germany through e, tuska through e, the same swabians, and so on and so on, they need to be presented as much as possible, but a vivid media image. no matter what means, so today to grow up for the voters for the domestic market, because they can not boast of economic success. they cannot boast with belarus. this is what

effect it has, that is, there are those who are in poland is supporting this in every possible way, look, closing the border. they denote an external enemy, an external enemy is always for internal use. moreover, on an external enemy. you can always find an internal enemy and say you are against the fight against external enemies, which are expressed in the closure of borders. so you are against us, you are an internal enemy. this is for internal use yesterday, if it goes back to putin's address, and he clearly divided the western elite, yes, our enemy. biden personified, that is, even more clearly in putin was looking for our enemy in his appeal. giving too big vague definitions for the enemy today means not uniting this weak association. now, if everything is clearly personified, yes, unfortunately

today with such simple things, you need to work with the audience faster. it's just that through information processes the effect is more than one one. that's just the nuance the border was closed. they as soon as arrived. it is still in front of the outside public for america poland has named its national idea for the upcoming elections. he said more america in europe everyone heard it. just think, poland will defend the usa in europe. this is completely surrender, national interest and the border was closed correctly, and about information issues came and shows more. we are ready to close the border for everything, to do anything. look at me. what kind of great poland, we're going to collapse everything in europe. this is preparation for the elections - this is information technology, but on the other hand. unfortunately for me and all belarusians, this is the surrender of polish sovereignty and independence completely for today. this ruling polish elite is not

independent at all. she is completely in her hands. listen to object more america in poland it means first of all in europe yes it means less germany it means less france and the uk is no longer in europe and not in the european union as a result of the british project to cut off germany and france that meet their economic needs from russian resources. it is performed in the same way for poland, the outer markers have converged and their internal interests. at the same time, one and the same message works perfectly for an external audience, like a connection with america with a big strong friend, but it works the same way inside poland, as the most important thing, yes, the poles are the first. the germans are the main non-germans, if you go back to the concept of national security and the second issue that was discussed, they are closely related. this is the people's militia. why is this important for us , a fairly new phenomenon ivanovich as

you can see , everyone should deal with security, therefore those who are in the unarmed forces not in power structures, nor in state bodies. uh, seniors are handicapped with skills that can u wield weapons and fight. that's what the people's militia, that is, uh, in every locality. eh, there was an opinion here. so i read in the press that it is in the villages and in the cities. it will be the same, especially the protection of public order, some public functions of the fulfillment of life, it will not stop there. yes, on approach. if uh, god forbid some kind of armed conflict will arise directly to the line front. everything will be clearly regulated there, there are military administrations and everything else, and somewhere in the rear. to maintain public order, public functions, well, and sabotage and reconnaissance groups in counteracting the identification of their e, preventing the facts of looting. here we see even an earthquake. in turkey, there were factors

of looting at once, there are different people , therefore, these functions are in the first place, therefore it all acquires a national character, but it is necessary to lay the regulatory framework for organizational conditions in order for this immediately earned. we sat and thought, how can we implement all this, how can we get it? whom and how to make it all work mechanism yury nu belarus declares and has always maintained its neutral status, and we always really, as experts said, want to live in peace consent with our neighbors. and well, taking into account the fact that the ring around our perimeter is now shrinking, in fact, uh, all countries except russian ones. federations have become unfriendly from lithuania to ukraine, then the best guarantee of independence sovereignty and neutrality such, of course, the better is the guarantee is

the appropriate preparation. and here i recall the example of israel, which is also in a hostile environment, therefore, there and uh, they took such measures, including the military service of not only males, but also females, but our western partners. they just don't leave us a choice. we must follow this path so that, as oleg sergeevich correctly said, be ready when, after this chatter about reconciliation, they try to strike. and we will be ready for the second question. and why don’t we say one more thing , it’s important who said that there are no people in belarus who want to defend their country themselves, i travel around the country. i will tell you that there is a request. it’s just that we sometimes orient ourselves on the internet to the opinion of some hipster who drinks zybitskaya beer and this is considered. that's all the belarusian youth is not true, go to the outback and talk there. i'm not saying that everything in this

direction is good, but willing people who want to can defend their country and want to learn this and be in this national militia. this is the second point, of course. every man should be able to defend his country. these are all countries. now he understands differently. there will be no military security, and the third moment of this is reassuring. by the way, i will tell you people far from the army, far from the special services. when they don't know anything. and when you don’t know anything, what are you afraid of, that’s why the weight of the components is informational work, what my colleague says explain explain show say and the second moment when he delves into it even with the help of these collections with the help of the teachings, these are the ones that are carried out to the regions. when he comes out of there, he understands how it all really looks. and the myths are crumbling fakes and the man is already his own work. the other day we saw that there was a meeting of two presidents alexander lukashenko, vladimir putin, it is clear that they discussed issues. there mutual security joint security.

it was based on the peace theme. look at the turnover of 50 billion for 80% of the implemented allied import substitution programs, as if specifically to show, look at us there is a global agenda, but it was very clearly visible from foreign journalists who communicated with the president. they convey the mood of their own, and politicians and their regimes. uh, they have this question endlessly. this is the president's answer. they are through one re- request. well, when will belarus enter into e, war in e ukraine. why do they want it so much? why is this topic for them not to hear it. the answer is they still gave this informational story, yes. well, no matter what the belarusian president answers, i still i will ask exactly in fact , this is not the first time we see that people come here not to hear the answers in order to ask a question in our space. after all.

before him in front of them in front of everyone now in front of all western media, i don’t like the word everyone by everyone, because this is a very big generalization, but in front of all western media whatever they are, even the american republican democratic ones there is the question of the information presence of control of someone else’s information space . today through the institute of chief editors. these media are promoting the idea of ​​confrontation, what is good for americans when confrontation is not on their own territory , yes, to everyone what is good about the constant presence of the topic of war outside their own field in a foreign information field, yes, they all come here to convey tension to us, no, in order for everyone to have their own the question to bring nervousness, because he is well aware that yes, they control a certain fraction of the space, a very large one too large for an external factor in the new

media, but at the same time they know that they are less present in classical media. yes, they have such a way out, they meet with the first person, whom i trust here in order to express at least a brief begging manner their dishes, runs from an uncomfortable question, turned around and went on autopilot. and let's listen. as the president answered, they are ready to fight together with the russians from the territory of belarus, or that only in one. for now, listen, if at least one soldier with a gun comes to our territory from there to kill my people. this applies not only ukraine this also applies to our other neighbors, who behave even more inadequately, if they commit aggression against belarus , the answer will be the most cruel and the war will acquire a completely different character. if

the meeting of the president by journalists were really shown on all european tv channels on american ones, i now fantasize. i understand that this is a fantasy. but it would be the effect of an exploding bomb, because all this spoon that was poured on the ears of the europeans is still spitting that belarus is some kind of aggressive state. it all collapsed, because look, the maidan biden is coming. he talks so much about the war. if you wanted peace. so i said, he was 3 days ago, i was here a week ago. i said, he would have said what he came out and said from 4 pm today, as i am in kiev, not a single rocket will fly to the donbass. i am in minsk for 6 hours in the palace of independence with alexander racer. lukashenka putin flies there and we start a conversation in the world. they showed alexandrovich one showed in europe an amazing fragment. i now i will definitely ask you and i to look at it, then we will continue, of course, to discuss it there. this occasion to communicate with

the belarusian president gave foreign journalists the opportunity to go to the border with ukraine to talk, including with the military, and here is one of the foreign journalists. he approached our military and asked and showed in his report. if you have to fight, you 're ready there amazing, just let's hear the answer, i think that's the way to nibble, let's, they heard it mmm. well, and, accordingly fully confirmed their template, which they actually build wild hordes from the east since the time of tolkien, yes, who will come, give money to the americans. they will cover us, we could have shown and could have shown something else, but they showed exactly what, uh, why they went for us, didn’t like anything for our perception.

why will we gnaw for us, right? this is also an obviously sarcastic moment of the subtlety of the language, and for a simple english translation, let's eat it. come on, everything, you are a radical connotation. why is this moment ripped out without previous dialogue? after all, this is clearly not the first question that has been asked. yes, the same journalist who performed the interview with the president now has 7 minutes left. not the first day, working in a structure that was at one time, but created in order not to take notes during the interview, because he already knew that he said that everything was written. and why the borders are being closed here it sounded, but i am supplemented because we conducted a visa-free regime for poland, when tens of thousands of citizens come here, they see that here what is happening with us is that the economy is developing peacefully. people, people's eyes are burning, because

they work for themselves and for their country. and they have prospects for normal peaceful prospects. and when they come, it's all 10 times more, because there are relatives , familiar friends, but they closed the border and the militarization of poland continues. eh why? e it's very important here. uh, a special military operation in ukraine because our fugitives are answering why do western journalists ask such a question, because they made a bet to the defeat of russia, and then they will already take on belarus. ukraine is strategically important, and belarus is five times more important than, uh, ukraine . here is the answer why western journalists ask such things. invited a biden and indeed many turned into a joke right away. yes, the president is trolling biden , come here, but it seems to me that i just agree with alex sergeevich , many were confused, because this is the shortest path

to restoring the bloodshed, and on ukraine front we are well aware that this is never in the interests of the united states of america, not even once. and that's why they told the presentations about it. of course they won't, but still. it wasn't trolling . and what does it mean to be ironic, if on our land in the same palace of independence, e, the signing of the minsk agreements took place? i don't think the chancellor of germany or the president of france, uh, is less in status than the president of the united states, so of course president lukashenko proposed the most uh. hmm the shortest way is the easiest. e, means, e option of the decision of questions. after all, it would seem such a complex conglomeration of how to figure out how it means that expert groups work, some councils are not government organizations, but the key is e, which means that in peace negotiations lies precisely in

that. is. yes, uh, that means, uh, invite the initiators of this conflict, the initiator of this conflict. these are the anglo-saxons, in particular the usa, because the kiev regime is controlled from the outside and we will not repeat this evidence for the hundredth time, too obviously, respectively, president lukashenka as an experienced politician with a genius instinct. he suggested the shortest way . biden arrives, putin arrives, they shake hands, they discuss , they draw something. yes, they agree. in no case can this be viewed through the prism of irony, this is a real option. well, yes. and to see and when, sooner or later, it means that this option will be implemented, because , probably, the superpowers will still negotiate. well, maybe it will be electricity heard in the united states the other day. states of america lukashenka know who

commented on this donald trump said that putin is president? there would be no 24 hours of war. let's listen to what arguments he accompanied everything. people i literally on the same night as i find out my pobeda i will call two people , you know who i won’t tell putin and zelensky. them. we need to meet. we'll meet, i guarantee i can work things out. i know exactly what to say to them, i will tell this one to the other the second and i will tell you to better agree. we will conclude an agreement within 24 hours. but we are the initiative suggest, and trump is her father. this suggests that this initiative is absolutely sensible and pragmatic, and it can really ensure peace between the two countries, when european politicians begin to lie that there is no way to peace now lukashenka understands everything perfectly, realizing the situation shows once again. it's all this way it's

simple. you just don't want to go through it. that's all. that's the truth let's continue the conversation. so, finally, we are trying to understand, after all, for whom i would come to kiev, who would be more we need this meeting, by the way, biden is with us in kiev, uh, they were surprised. well, aren't you surprised? no? yes, i probably uh, i was not surprised, because the biden had, but one chance to go to agaya and walk there through the polluted yes american polluted territories. and at least try to explain something to trump's root electorate. as a matter of fact, it says, yes, people who do not earn very much, and then they will also live in the contaminated territory and drink contaminated water could come. yes, as long as it's not in aha

, that's the trick for him. it was presidents day well, such is the official name of the day of the presidents, he could spend it either with his electorate, eh? where he gets the most points. he did it, his electorate looks at, uh, foreign policy, or he could spend it with a republican who is not with the electorate, specifically in his own place and get a hat. he weighed it up and decided not the most, his headquarters simply decided where he could get the best press, the best and big press. he was able to get in kiev about what , in fact, and there was no need to look for two options. the only question was whether whether he will receive the same good press warsaw yes , most likely he will receive yesterday's. e last. well, the first comments after his speech said yes to the people. it went in, because his speech was built on

the simplest repetition of what was already known without overworking, plus there were children at the end. the children were not returned by the chinese, typical ukrainians are still yes, this is a sign, we work in a system of signs. we need to get used to it. sorry, i'll get it. we need to get used to the fact that we are working simultaneously in e, the real plane and in the system of signs. and if now for someone of politicians, the sign system gives more points, he works with the sign system. what does this mean for us? here, let's practically conclude that the system of signs symbolism absolutely supports. we see that in general western culture is involved in this. not only, by the way, western, yes, and what symbols should we then use to generate new ones or raise them from this is our choice. and this we return to the first question, do we want to create? a new symbol system or should we really

invest to advertise traditional values, sadly, it sounds, but the simplest things. i, we are the mother of the world, that's what we wrote in cursive there in schools in kindergartens, the first words that we drew. now all this works not through words. it works through images of emotions. yes, we need to come up with new advertising that would act on the younger generation, when you started talking about the fact that the people's militia will rely on adults, even, well, there, and even the old people yes, that's right, but when we are talking about an example israel's example israel begins where israel's example begins with the fact that everyone knows that they will join the army at a young age of kindergarten quite rightly and when the first political magazine is designed for a younger student - this is normal. yes, it is necessary to work with a younger audience and yes

, through the language that they have, maybe it is not necessary to come up with a new value system. we need to invent a new language, the language of images, the language of emotions. which would now be perceived by a young youth audience, which would give the effect trump when he speaks in short, clear words, when he speaks with politicians, he uses longer words, when he speaks in public , he uses short words. biden tries, knowing that he speaks badly , tries in general to be silent to keep silent. everything in the system of views is tense, or and so on. yes, no matter how funny it sounds, but they work through emotions in order to connect, including young people, one moment , not for the first time, to the united states of america make a bet in solving internal problems on the external factor it was a hundred years old, but the biden visit. this is another business visit. listen to me today ukraine and europe

are the main source of income for the united states of america this year. they've made millions of dollars and they want to make millions more. he left to look at investments, so that everything would spin, he launched ukraine to the last ukrainian. fight came to warsaw, prepare the poles to the last pole. close borders. come on, choke. we are with you it is money will come to the white house and tell representatives of the military-industrial complex. how many more contracts? how many millions? how much more land will they take? how many businesses is money. now i absolutely agree about the meanings, for example, watching the speech of the president of russia, i was more interested in the non-military component, which was mused all over. and what's the point? what are the meanings? what new prices are you benchmarking for development within russia in the coming decades, because it is important for belarus because we then heard the union many. uh, many paid attention to one more such moment, and i'll ask her sixes.

show this video, and zelensky his facial expression when he met the bideno. well smiled, they hugged each other, but when the bilateral and extended meetings took place. look at his face. it is evil. and this anger. he cannot hide, and many are now wondering what biden could say to zelensky that the president of ukraine has become gloomier than a cloud. here, what's not to say or say, because i think deep down zelensky understands this little circus and the game he himself plays. and when he sees that in fact there is no experience, all these beautiful words are not for zelensky, zelensky is like steel, ukrainians are like steel. well, does he really not understand in the depths of his soul that they are used by planes, they promised me. uh, common words for all requests, as americans know how to communicate, smile from ear to ear, of course. everything, let's see. tomorrow after tomorrow. and how will they do it? i will look only at my own interests only at my own interests. a there will probably be a lot of words, but the effect of

the visit of the us president was not the one that the kiev regimes were counting on. to provide more on the inner surface, uh , additional financial military assistance , primarily through the supply of fighter jets, maybe the ukrainian regime is openly negotiating to drag them in at least some way. uh, at least some kind of nuclear warhead, yes, in simple terms . just some kind of tactical nuclear weapon. at least just place it in kiev . they think it will be insurance. i don't they talk like that, but as for these victorious reactions, what do they say? here the baydyn hugged zelensky well, you remember how he, uh, hugged a korzai from afghanistan, and like uh, three weeks before fleeing afghanistan, that means, uh, a telephone conversation took place with the president of the next

afghanistan traffic police and biden. said what it means to support america and afghan democracy. she is unshakable, and in 3 weeks. the afghans were already on the chassis to escape from this very afghan democracy, so uh, so uh, everything is strategically clear. they need a meat grinder here. here they need a regional war for the americans and they need us to be involved, that's not just the americans, and i'll just support it. you can continue. uh, the munich security conference is essentially a manifestation of the fact that no matter how we talk about the west, they are united in their anti-russia. in this project of mine. eh, risha, the shortage of weapons among the european members of the atlantic alliance should not cause panic. the depletion of europe's military arsenals is not a problem and the main argument. how is he explains, they were already intended against russia , well, uh, stoltenberg nato secretary general in the alliance is not so afraid of the third world war

as russia's victory in the conflict in ukraine, that is, we should perfectly what happened in munich should be cut into quotes and within the framework here . uh, that active brisk information policy that we need, as i said. gleb means to show it on all channels, because this is not just some kind of russophobes score. it's some kind of score. e man hateful hateful ideology what they said there is not fit in the head of a normal person and europeans. that is. uh, if you remember the previous munich conferences, well, uh, sharp grin, they never bared it means that they put a lot on this war very simply before, excuse me, i can’t help but say that you know, we for decades they have been trying to change the government in russia and he says, and this is belarus should become. and we saw it all with our own eyes, but so far it has not happened. let's think about how the situation in ukraine is being used now and change power. this is what all people should know. that is the price

of democracy by choosing freedom. we say it, sometimes people don't understand, some listen to the macron, listen to the ball. and when lexus and vovan called him, and he said openly, this is a gray area. it's not the people who live there. this is our territory, let's figure it out. that's right. you know that it is alarming that they have loosened their tongues so much, this suggests that they are still confident in their victory, they are the bank. they are precisely because to speak like that to the whole world. uh, it means that they spit on diplomatic norms, that they they use the negotiations in order to deceive partners that the arsenals were already intended for russia. that is, how can this be explained? this can be explained by the fact that their current operation. well, excuse me, i'll get in , again from my side, maybe not in time for their current operation to be quickly completed, because at the same conference in the fields, they met with the vans.

and with him they behaved in a completely different way, because they know that their senior desks. ner, right now scratching his turnips and thinking, so necessary. here's something quick. win, because china will start next and china will start in full. china will begin on the whole indian. pacific ocean. in parallel with this, the massacre for artificial intelligence and a conference in the hague will begin. on february 14, the military use of artificial intelligence was proclaimed at the suggestion, the united states the same exercises in the arctic ocean for the first time in military fighters in e, in the north of greenland this is all that they already see, and they still stuck in the old war, they still stuck in a war where real ones are divided resources. and they will continue to fight for virtual, so they are ready

today, yes, they are ready for a quick victory here, because they have no other option, if they do not win quickly here, then they lose completely in the night, sit down there, uh here it was said that why is zelensky so sad well, yes, sad sad unsatisfied, let's just say, in a simple way, yes? eh why? i will express my version, because what he wanted to hear did not sound natural, but in my opinion. biden is also preparing for twenty fourth year for elections. and what kind of luggage is she going with, and this is his trip to ukraine, what is he mozgovoy, right? to continue, this is also evidence that he has nothing to show the americans in foreign policy that he has in his luggage. e about the minsk conference yes, there was a high-ranking representative of china, with whom contacts were supposed to take place before the conference, but then uh, because of this chinese probe, these contacts did not take place, that

is, uh, the european european establishment has no idea what will happen next and china uh, the intrigue is that there are no statements about what his vision is for the continuation of this conflict, so uh, now i think that there will be the last breath of this collective west to pump up arms in order to support quickly and win . if not, then they will negotiate with china, isn’t this ivan’s vision of china, and just on the sidelines of the münker conference - this is many times he was now called one of the most senior chinese diplomats. he says we are convinced about ukraine, we we are convinced that this crisis situation can only be resolved through peaceful negotiations. this is the first time. well, the second is a message, first of all, probably, to ukrainians, some forces do not want peace in ukraine and their strategic goals extend beyond the borders of this country. that is, what we all said today, ukraine is not the goal. yes, this is only an intermediate stage,

yes, let's go. the fact is that the collective west sees that europe still calculates two moves ahead, but the americans calculate much further and any wars. how much would they did not continue, still end in negotiations and peace, therefore, if in the near future, they will be activated. here are these attempts to seize the initiative to achieve great success, for which in order to have more advantageous conditions for negotiating. that's the maximum they can hope for. uh, the side of the west sounded that it is impossible to defeat a nuclear power, therefore , about a comprehensive victory, it is possible for uh, our oppositionists to say that we will win in ukraine and take on belarus, but everyone who sensibly and objectively evaluates. they they understand that there is no victory, because it will not be objective, there can be more advantageous conditions for the world in order to make peace and concentrate, including on

countering china, because the us national security strategy china comes first, not russia russia and could not answer normally the question could, who asked him, but listen, and you can supply weapons to ukraine a. why can't i supply weapons to russia, what's wrong with that? what is the difference boral tried to explain what it is something else, but i think that a normal explanation cannot be given. of course , here's another question so that we can somehow put it together, here are the different opinions that were voiced today. in this program, when you really observe what is happening in ukraine, you try to understand how they came to such a life that it is clear that there are many different factors, but at the same time you need to understand that there is an important internal factor. at some point, they played politics, pulled, pulled, tore the state and poured in or demons of various stripes. nazis we see now tanks that drive with crosses. these nazi greetings, and the assignment of the honorary title of edelweiss to one

of the brigades and so on, the west does not see this. why because he already played this card in the 20th century, anaha, it works well and now we are building a civil society. we continue to build laws on political parties on civil society, updated status. this is how we can build our civil society in such a way that after a while it does not turn into a rupture. where's how to these demons will pour into ukraine, the nazis are there, and we are for somehow an attempt to replace it. the idea of ​​patriotism , let's pack into the idea of ​​patriotism something that has nothing to do with patriotism and some uncle across the ocean will tell us how and with whom to wage war. here is oleg sergeevich what we should focus on today is a very complex topic, but i will try to be very brief. the first is not to confuse democracy with permissiveness and the absence of law and the absence of any rules in

politics and in building a civil society. this is the first mistake of ukraine when everything must be democratic, everyone can be. so what if it's a fascist democracy? so what if this party opposes the constitution, they have the right to vote. this is democracy and freedom. so what, they want to move to belarus to remove the russian language from the state to destroy the constitution, all we have done is democracy. this is the first mistake that should never be made so that this does not happen, and the second mistake. this is an external factor to allow politics, ukraine first collapse. the ussr allowed it, belarus i watched recently. you you know, this should be shown on tv . when i sit down, i can name it's okay tikhonovskaya sits and communicates with the head of the 40s fund, and he complains, belarus is one of the first countries who kicked us out of here. so this is our happiness, thanks. lukashenka must be told that the external factor should be removed from politics forever, as soon as we launch these

funds of these diplomats who are sitting at the round table, and we report to them how we conducted the elections or before we observe, we will try democratically to comply your standards. and you hear us hear us end. all the collapse from the two points is not to confuse democracy with the law, and the second is to remove the external fact, and then we will not let this happen, the corresponding hmm mechanisms should be created, and they have already been created. that is the first stage. here is the formation. the new political reality is over, that is, the law on political parties on civil society has been adopted ; all belarusian people's assemblies have completed the change in the electoral legislation. yes, next step next year, a reboot of such a political system, but in ukraine , uh, this situation. hmm, this situation did not come in one year there, uh, at least three decades,

the entire political elite decomposed, including, because the means of production in ukraine belonged to all oligarchs. in our country, this means of production belongs, er, to the belarusian people, and naturally the oligarchs played with their puppet parties. this is what they led to, by the way, very interesting figures raised, uh, exactly a year ago, when the government of ukraine was discussing the budget it gave a certificate to the verkhovna rada explaining the number of people living in ukraine, and there it was. the number was recorded with the government at 35 million. imagine it was 51 million . 5 is now officially in russia, five more are in europe, that is, -10, and another 5 are not accounted for anywhere, but they also fled all over the world usa canada and

latin america that is, now there are no more than 20 million people in ukraine, we say this, why is that what led irresponsible politicians who were, yes, perhaps more attractive to the youth and went in, so they lost this information war on images. uh, so, uh, the russian side, but in the end, look what happened as a result of a belligerent country with a catastrophically low level for such a territory. the population, and in order to prevent this, we launched this formation of a new political reality. and they will not allow these laws, rules and procedures, regulations. they will not allow such people as in ukraine to come to power never heard. if the two key components yes are external internal

policy factor and e, information control. yes, we allow, we can prevent politicians. all the more the same. uh, the fascists in germany came in a democratic way, so, and the first country that kicked out von soros on a grand scale was just the united kingdom, if you remember a little history, so, uh, yes, you can physically contain at the level of the system of internal barriers of some - then individuals or political parties from being present in politics. can this be done with the other side until we control the information space . to popularize our image and we will not invest real money in advertising the simplest things, and then more complex things. we won't be able to keep the next and next and next generation from opting for the flashy blanks, swung by technology. buddy with

foreign structures speaking different languages ​​and dressing nicely and they'll still have nice socks, yes, like rows. here we can't, we can't fix forever political reality in a situation where no external force is able to push through its man. if we can't control information, control information. today, the primary control of information, based on the control of the emotional sector of the cultural ideological. yes, but the cultural informational one here is a very substantive remarque literally for a minute, therefore, supplementing our system of checks , contradictions, and balances of barriers. we must take the best from these quarterers, because that everything they do is in the information space. it's just brilliant. it was better

that these quartermen had money and a kommoiska, with which he did not spare anything, there was no need for ivanovich to become our talisman, what tasks did we have. here we talked about tools specifically to strengthen our society. if possible, say so in general, but no external influence can be productive if there is internal unity, if people are confident in the future, if they have stability, stability and in the economy and in politics and in culture and in all other relationships , including family, therefore, we have spiritual and moral values. speaking in a scientific language, speaking in a simple way, then you need to hear your people speak and always pursue a fair policy. what the president of our country has repeatedly said is the main conclusion. in my opinion, which we have made of the twentieth year. this is for the modernization of all aspects of our society, including the political system and those. uh,

constitutional changes that could back adopted and is now being implemented, and all the belarusian people's assembly and the political party for the development and development of civil society are aimed at all this, including the information component of information security. therefore, if we hear people react, then there will be no external influence. to what extent and whoever, uh, would not tie up under it, it will all go into the sand. that is why we must hear our people and not only the authorities, which is located in the central organs. well, the district executive committees and village councils and collective farms and enterprises. thank you. thank you for your opinion, which was voiced in this program today. i thank our guests for sharing their thoughts on the events taking place . thank you to our viewers for today everything , see you in a week happily.