everything is open. these are fundamental questions. it will be submitted for public discussion, and in the near future. eh, this is that there is a new quality of content, we know that national security is a state of protection of national interests from internal and external threats, but the project adds a very clear goal for the further progressive development of the belarusian society, that is, the goal is clearly traced further. uh, if we answer questions. uh, from what to protect from threats? uh, in the project, uh, the concepts are clear designated types of image risks, challenges and direct threats. that is, the stage due to the birth of the tarik, the stage of formation and development is a challenge and a direct threat. this is what exists for e. society needs protection, speaking of spheres , a biological sphere is added there and

i won’t specify for everyone. it’s clear how many epidemics we have experienced over the past decade , an episode and uh, various challenges and threats, including those that include laboratories. yes, around our country in the post-soviet space, but they talk about national interests. you, too, in your prelude to this issue, noted that it very clearly emphasizes the fact that such concepts appear in the strategic national interests as the ideology of the belarusian state, patriotic education of the people in belarus as an object of protection. and this is all connected precisely with the goal of ensuring national security. and in general. if we say that it is very important that our country, its originality lies in the fact that once we wanted to be a bridge between the east. and west and this is a strategic goal and we still have it, but the current

situation is today. it says that, unfortunately, in this situation it is necessary to be able to find e, forces and means in order to develop in our society in our state. uh, i'll just finish a second and uh , specifically speaking of strategic national interests. we need to note that only if every member of the belarusian society deals with issues of ensuring national security, then we will have national security secured, everything is correctly said with every word of consent, but people are watching us on tv, what they want, every belarusian wants to live peacefully, so that there is no war, so that there are no terrorist attacks in the country, so that no one sways the situation to live peacefully develop. by the way, the europeans want this document. this is what we are discussing now, this is the concept of national security of the law of the people's militia , the most important thing is that it comes first from life, and the real conditions in which our country is now living and the second can write a million documents. he's fine the most important thing now for

all these years, especially last year. we are doing everything for national security, that is, we are strengthening it, and why should we do this? again, you want peace. always be ready for war, and the president spoke about this at a meeting with journalists. and here is a clear parallel example. eh, with the great patriotic war, someone did not understand her. for example, i understood very well when the ussr was chattering for many years and they said that we never entered the rise of the war if the president said more such mistakes in belarus, for example, no one will ever repeat. we don't threaten anyone. actually. we have never laid claim to any territory. there was and is no aggression on our part, but to believe in fairy tales that you do not threaten us. we will be no more. we will discuss more. probably he is worth biden, russia speaking, we did not threaten who our main threat is anymore. is there is the united states of america is there? ukraine that's who he is the number one threat to us, i would uh, most importantly,

the threat is internal stability in the country no one from the outside will ever win belarus. that's the most important thing - this is the strengthening, which we are doing, of the internal unity of internal political stability. now it has really strengthened, because sorry no enemy, never destroy us. and yet, nevertheless, a colleague will say a lot about this and he says it right, oleg sergeevich says the information letter, see. here we have poland, which is like such a mandatory jock. here, uh, asteroids are being driven in, they are pumping up muscles. if it goes on like this, she'll drive herself to cardiac arrest. we have closes the borders. we have the united states of america, which for the first time introduced us to belarus more in its concept of ukraine's security. well, i'll say a popular thing. here's what the poles are now pumping up weapons what they do not do at the border polish lilits don't think about one thing. if they drag the whole of europe into a war, they won't succeed. so poland , for example, got involved, belarus. if suddenly they

would have succeeded once, then it will not work, and they and someone will serve time, then there will be no more. in an hour no one understands from polish politicians and, for example, the lithuanian president, who said, let's move on to the red line. he does not understand that in 20 minutes there will be no lithuania. it's just this language trick who is the chief doctor for us, poland. uh, the polish people are not our enemy, but poland itself is an aggressive state that today threatens our national security. and we say this openly, we warn polish politicians about this, that we will never tolerate it. we see it, we watch it, and we have something to answer. i why they ask the question, because from year to year, until the twentieth year, we said that we are peace-loving, we are, and so it is, but above all at the same time, if we deceive ourselves and do not clearly designate for ourselves as, for example , the same americans. they say we have russia we have china belarus they fit in hostile. that's who we should

have in mind, how hostile is right, hostile means, but here we must also take into account that politics is a little more complicated. that is, we understand this general trend, which we we see we must understand who if what, it is within these countries themselves it is clear and gleb is considered, and how it was noticed. quite right. i will talk about the information component, when the issue was discussed , including on the people's militia. i had one question, and it is done on the basis of tradition on our ideas the message, from which it is assumed that everyone will protect their home, and based on this, the general national security will be strengthened accordingly. i have a question, taking into account the fact that in the global in the information space today there is a clear message from the west through culture through the media through a new media that

individualization. i would even say atomization. a person within society is a positive process, bearing in mind that saving oneself and everything will be fine. as a last resort , you can move to new zealand and when this is promoted very, very much for a lot of money. how much money will we spend on ensuring that our correct traditional other values ​​\u200b\u200bare protecting the home of our family of our hearth, they will be in the information space are present this is the main issue, as i believe, because we hope to remain unchanged our traditional values. unfortunately, they are under direct attack under and they are just under threat. they are just trying to shake this base, and returning to poland

, polish politicians think very strongly what to do in the autumn elections, and taking into account the fact that they know very well that the current party, law and justice in the autumn elections, will be opposed by non-russians . not in any way. not we and will implant germany through e, let through uh, the same schwab, and so on and so on, they need to present the most , uh, vivid image of the media. no matter what means, so today to grow up for the voters for the domestic market, because they can not boast of economic success. they cannot boast with belarus. this is what effect it produces, that is, there are those in poland who in every possible way support this yes, well, look, closing the border. they denote an external enemy, an external enemy is always for internal use. moreover, on

external enemy. you can always find an internal enemy and say you are against the fight against external enemies, which are expressed in the closure of borders. it means that you are an internal enemy against us. this is for internal use yesterday, if we return to putin's address, and he clearly divided the western elite. yes, biden personified our enemy, that is, putin was looking for our enemy even more clearly in his appeal. giving too big vague definitions for the enemy today means not uniting this weak association. here if everything is clearly personified, yes, unfortunately today with such simple things, it is necessary to work with the audience faster. it's just that through the information process the effect is more than one. that's just the nuance the border was closed. they as soon as arrived. it is still in front of the outside

public for america poland has named its national idea for the upcoming elections. he said more america in europe everyone heard it. this is what you think. poland will protect the united states in europe this is completely surrender, national interests and the border was closed correctly to speak about information questions. a byte arrived and shows more. we are ready to close the border for everything, to do anything. look at me. what kind of great poland, we're going to collapse everything in europe. this is preparation for the elections - this is information technology, but on the other hand. unfortunately for me and all belarusians, this is the surrender of polish sovereignty and independence completely for today. this ruling polish elite is not independent at all. it is completely in the hands of more america in poland, which means in first of all in europe , yes, this means less germany, this means less france and

the uk is no longer in europe and not in the european union as a result of the british project to cut off germany and france, which correspond to their economic needs from russian resources. it is exactly the same performed in poland, the external markers and their internal interests have converged. at the same time, one and the same message works perfectly for an external audience, like a connection with america with a big strong friend, but it works in the same way inside poland, as the most important thing, yes, poles first. the germans are the main non-germans, if you go back to the concept of national security and the second issue that was discussed, they are closely related. this is the people's militia. why this is important for us is a rather new phenomenon with anvarovich. as you can see, yes, and everyone should be engaged, therefore, those who are in the unarmed forces are not in law enforcement agencies, nor in state bodies. uh, seniors are handicapped with

skills that can u wield weapons and fight. that's what the people's militia, that is, uh, in every populated paragraph. eh, there was an opinion here. so i read in the press that it is in the villages and in the cities. it will be the same, especially the protection of public order, some public functions of the fulfillment of life, it will not stop there. yes, on approach. if uh, god forbid some kind of armed conflict will arise directly to the front line. everything will be clearly regulated there, there are military administrations and everything else, and somewhere in the rear. maintain public order, public functions, well, sabotage and reconnaissance groups for counteracting the identification of their e, preventing the facts of looting. here we see even an earthquake. in turkey, there were factors of looting at once, there are different people . therefore, these functions are in the first place, therefore it all acquires a national character, but it is necessary to lay the regulatory framework for organizational conditions in order for this to work immediately. we sat and thought,

how can we implement all this, how can we get it? whom and how to do it all, as a working mechanism, belarus declares and has always declared its neutral m. i. status we always really , as experts said, want to live in peace agreement with our neighbors, eh, but taking into account the fact that the ring around our perimeter is now shrinking , in fact, uh, all countries except russia. operations have become hostile from lithuania to ukraine, then the best guarantee of independence of sovereignty and such neutrality, of course, the best guarantee is appropriate training. and here i recall the example of israel , which is also in a hostile environment, so there and uh, we went to such measures, including, as the service in the army

of representatives not only of the male, but also of the female, but our western partners. they just don't leave us a choice. we must follow this path so that, as alex sergeevich rightly said, be ready when, after this chatter about reconciliation, they try to strike. and we will be ready for the second question. and why don’t we say one more thing , it’s important who said that there are no people in belarus who want to defend their country themselves, i travel around the country. i will tell you that there is a request. it’s just that we sometimes orient ourselves on the internet to the opinion of some hipster who drinks zybitskaya beer and this is considered. that's all the youth of belarus is not true. go to the outback and chat there. i'm not saying that everything in this direction is good, but willing people who want can defend their country and want to learn this and be in this people's militia. this is the second point, of course. every man should be able to defend his country. these are all countries. now they understand

differently there will be no military security and the third point of this is reassuring. by the way, i will tell you people far from the army, far from the special services. when they don't know anything. and when you don’t know anything, what are you afraid of, that’s why the weight of the components is informational work, what my colleague says explain explain show say and the second moment, when he delves into it even with the help of these collections with the help of teachings, these ones that are carried out in the regions. when he comes out of there, he understands how it all really looks. and myths are crumbling fakes and a person is already on another information work the other day we saw that there was a meeting of two presidents alexander lukashenko, vladimir putin, it is clear that they discussed issues. there mutual security joint security. it was based on the peace theme. look at the trade turnover under 50 billion, 80% of the implemented allied import substitution programs, as if on purpose to show. look, we have a global agenda. but it was very clear from the foreign journalists who

spoke with the president. they transmit mood and that's their own, but politicians and their regimes. uh, they have this question endlessly. this is the president's answer. they ask the question again after one. well, when will belarus enter into e, war in e ukraine . why do they want it so much? why is this topic for them not to hear it. the answer is they still gave this informational story, yes. well, no matter what the belarusian president answers, anyway, i will ask precisely in fact, this is not the first time we see that people come here not to hear answers in order to space to ask a question. in the end. before him in front of them in front of everyone now in front of all western media, i don’t like the word everyone by everyone, because this is a very big generalization, but in front of all western media whatever they are, even the american republican democratic ones there is the question of the information presence of control of someone else’s

information space . today, through the institution of editors-in-chief, and these media , the idea of ​​​​confrontation is being promoted, what is good for americans when confrontation is not on their own territory, yes, to everyone what is good, because that they are well aware that yes, they control a certain proportion of space, a very large one too large for an external factor in the new media, but at the same time they know that they are less present in the classical media. yes, they have such a way out, they meet with the first person whom i trust here in order to express at least a brief question mark, let's listen. how did the president answer, together with the russians, to fight from the territory of belarus, or that only in one case so far, if at least one soldier with

a gun comes to our territory from there to kill my of people. this applies not only to ukraine. this also applies to our other neighbors, who behave even more inappropriately. if they commit aggression against belarus, the answer will be the most severe? the most severe and the war will acquire a completely different character significant sporting events in the context of the whole world were very worthy of our girls 4.10.12 places the level of competition in russia today you know what therefore , we hope that these are promising guys. they will show the result of key news in the future and belarus sports facts are the flagship of belarusian

football. and this, despite a significant renewal of the composition and a change in the coaching bridge of a new generation of belarusian athletes. today we can pay more attention to our hockey, so today we are attracting more children, 40 places are being vacated there for young guys. there is an opportunity to take the young. they make stars out of them. look at belarus 24 tv channel. traveling around belarus and discovering new sights is another attraction. bridles. tomb of the family zavish, personally, it reminds me of a miniature egyptian pyramid, but few people know that besides it, there are also ruins-estates of the family behind visha, which are located in pervomaisk. we get acquainted with the original belarusian traditions. and we , again, yes, where we are taking the bald agatha makes the body of a cat

from the dough, the eyes are berries, the ears are fat, and the tail is village sausage, most importantly, we experience vivid emotions. if the meeting of the president by journalists were indeed shown on all european

tv channels on american i would now fantasize. i understand that this is a fantasy. but it would be the effect of an exploding bomb, because all this spoon that poured on the ears of the europeans is still pouring that belarus is some kind of aggressive state. it all collapsed, because look, the maidan biden is coming. he talks so much about the war. if he wanted peace, so i said, he had 3 days ago even back. i said, what would he say, he came out and said from four in the evening today, as i am in kiev, not a single rocket will fly to the donbass. in minsk, 6 o'clock in the palace of independence, everything alexander grigoryevich lukashenko , putin arrives there and we started. and they did not show alexandrovich, they showed an amazing fragment in europe. now i will definitely ask you and i to look at it, then we will continue, of course, to discuss it hmm uh , i gave foreign journalists a reason to communicate with the belarusian president, it is possible

to go to the border with ukraine to talk, including with the military, and here is one of the foreign journalists . he approached our military and asked and showed in his report. if you you have to fight, you are ready there amazing just the answer let's listen, of course it will. this is how we will gnaw. but no , they heard, uh hmm, and, accordingly, they fully confirmed their template, which , in fact, they are building wild hordes from the tail since the time of tolkien, yes, which will come and gnaw. give money to the americans. they will cover us, we could show and they could show something else, but they showed exactly what, uh, actually why they went for us. why are they still closed to our perception? why for us? we're going to bite, right?

this is also an obviously sarcastic moment of the subtlety of the language, and for a simple english translation, let's eat it. yeah well, all of you have a radical connotation. why is this moment torn out without previous dialogue? after all, this is clearly not the first question that has been asked. yes, the same journalist who performed the interview with the president now has 7 minutes left. not the first day, working in a structure that was at one time, but created in order not to take notes during the interview, because he already knew that he said that everything was written. and why the borders are being closed here sounded, but i added, because we conducted a visa-free regime and for poland, when tens of thousands of citizens come here, they see what is happening here, that the economy is developing peacefully, people’s eyes are burning, because they work for yourself and your country. and

they have prospects for normal peaceful prospects. and when they come, it's all 10 times more, because there are relatives , familiar friends, but they closed the border and the militarization of poland continues. eh why? e it's very important here. uh, a special military operation in ukraine because our fugitives answer why do western journalists ask such a question, because they bet on the defeat of russia and then they will take on belarus ukraine is strategically important, and belarus is five times more important than, uh, ukraine here here is the answer why western journalists ask such questions, see oleg sergeevich raised the topic several times already about the fact that the president invited the biden and indeed many turned immediately into hochma. yes, the president is trolling biden, come here, but it seems to me that i just agree with alex sergeyevich , many were confused, because this is the shortest way to stop the bloodshed, and on

the ukrainian front, we are well aware that this is never interests of the united states of america never. and that's why they told the presentations about it. of course they won't, but still. it wasn't trolling . and what does it mean to be ironic, if on our land in the same palace of independence, uh, went signing the minsk agreements. i don't think the chancellor of germany or the president of france, uh, is less in status than the president of the united states, so of course president lukashenko proposed the most uh. hmm , the shortest way is the easiest. e, means, e option of the decision of questions. after all, it would seem such a complex conglomeration of how to figure out how it means that expert groups work, some councils are not a government organization, but the key is e, which means that in peace negotiations lies precisely in

that. is. yes, uh, so, uh, invite the initiators of this conflict the initiator of this conflict. these are the anglo-saxons, in particular the united states, because the kiev regime is controlled from the outside and we will not repeat this evidence for the hundredth time, it is too obvious, respectively, president lukashenko as an experienced politician with, e, a brilliant instinct. he suggested the shortest way . biden arrives, putin arrives, they shake hands, they discuss , they draw something. yes, they agree. in no case can this be viewed through the prism of irony, this is a real option. here, yes. and you'll see, when sooner or later, then this the option will be implemented, because all the same, probably, the superpowers will negotiate. well, perhaps it will be heard in the united states of america the other day . lukashenka, do you know who commented on this ? donald trump said that putin is president?

there would be no 24 hours of war. let's listen to what arguments he carried out all this. people i literally on the same night as i find out my pobeda i will call two people, you know who i won’t tell putin and zelensky. them. we need to meet. we'll meet, i guarantee i can work things out. i know exactly what tell them, i'll tell this one to the other the second and tell you to better negotiate. we will conclude an agreement within 24 hours. but we propose an initiative, and trump plagiarizes it. this suggests that this is an absolutely sound and pragmatic initiative, and it can really ensure peace between the two countries when european politicians begin to lie that there is no way to peace now. lukashenka understands everything perfectly, realizing the situation shows once again. it's all this way it's simple. you just don't

want to follow it. that's all. that's the truth let's continue the conversation. so, finally , we are trying to understand, after all, for whom, damn it, would come, but in kiev, who needed this meeting more , it’s called biden with us in kiev, uh, they were surprised. well, you're definitely not surprised. no, forgivable. yes, i, probably, i was not surprised, because biden had, but one chance to go to aga and walk there through the polluted yes american polluted territories and at least try to explain something. trump's root electorate, in fact, in agai, yes to people who are not very many earn, and then they will live in the contaminated territory and drink contaminated water could come. yes, as long as it's not in aha , that's the trick for him. it was the day of the presidents of the united states

. well, this is the official name of the day of the presidents, he could spend it either with his electorate. and where he gets the maximum points. he did it, his electorate looks at, uh, foreign policy, or he could spend it with a foreign republican sector specifically at home and get a hat. he estimated, weighed and decided not the most, he decided his headquarters just where he was can get better press better and bigger press. he was able to get in kiev about what , in fact, and there was no need to look for two options. the only question was whether he would receive the same good press from warsaw . well, the first comments, after his speech, said that yes, the people went in, because his speech was built on the simplest repetition of what was already known without

overworking. plus there were kids at the end. the children were chinese e do not return, typical ukrainians. warsaw yes, we know it, we work in a system of signs. we need to get used to it. sorry, this is volume. we need to get used to the fact that we are working simultaneously in e, the real plane and in the system of signs. and if now for some politicians the system of signs gives more points, he works with the system of knowledge. what e? and what does this mean for us? here let's practically conclusions absolutely support the system of signs symbolism. we will see that in general western cultures. only involved in this