[000:00:00;00] the first marat sergeevich what needs to be said is that nothing in life is so upsetting, like a trifle, and therefore everyone is at their own level, that's what yesterday, speaking in one of the dome district executive committee in front of the leadership of the district executive committee. i talked about what you represent for the inhabitants of the kopol district of the state for a person that foreman, foreman of the head of the organization, who is fair in encouraging in bonuses, the one who is fair in providing vacation planning in human terms. he shoots right away a lot of questions that should be sorted out at a higher level, and if in the place of the chairman of the executive committee, then these questions are simply solved based on the situation that exists. yes, the belarusian people's

assembly is a strategic body, and the powers that are granted to it by law today. they are not even talking about the medium-term, but the long-term development of our society in our country. after all, there is a position. er, regarding the adoption of, uh, socio-economic development programs - once, the military doctrine, the most serious document, which will also be adopted at the entire belarusian people's assembly, is the approval of the concept of national security. hearing annually the prime minister on the results of the government's activities, the possibility of planning and holding a referendum, the approval of the legitimacy of the elections, because this is a provision that directly affects the development of society. e, for many years, will there be conflicts of interest between the wind authorities, despite the fact that essentially new state bodies have appeared, whose

powers yes, to a certain extent, it will overlap with the powers of the branches of government, and moreover, it is vested with the right to cancel individual decisions of the branches of power. now, wouldn't the conflict be interesting? in this case, you know, here we are sergeyevich. this is the work that was carried out on the development of documents. it was precisely this that implied the non -admission of the dual functioning of various structures. yes, i understand, you mean, well, the parliament and the entire belarusian people's assembly the entire belarusian people's assembly and uh, the judiciary uh no, everyone these provisions are provided for and within the framework of the functioning of the entire belarusian people's assembly laid down. but the fact that the entire belarusian people's assembly has the right to cancel certain decisions. yes, this is if these decisions contradict, er, the foundations of our system, those cases when they call for various kinds of actions that could harm our

state. if i argue. i am for myself. what formula did you come up with. uh, it turns out that, in fact, the heads of all branches of government will be part of the entire belarusian people's assembly. and this is, in essence. this is a platform where, to put it mildly, they can be pointed out by representatives of another branch of government, yes, by civil society. that is, guys. here the question is a little e is not quite correctly posed or the wrong decision has been worked out, come on. we will correct some of them, returning to history, this is how we should be people 's things, when everyone has equal rights to express themselves, with the exception of the chairman, his deputy and the presidium on those issues that are considered at the meeting. that is it is essentially like a system of higher control. such. we can say it is possible, at least, let's say yes, well, then let's follow the algorithm. this is how it will all happen, for example, an important but controversial issue appeared on the agenda, the delegates gathered at the palace of the republic, for example, and then what, how

is this discussion going? that is, as i understand it, because we do not yet know how it will be online voting, anonymous voting by a majority of votes. at what level should this happen? this is all it's in the law, as i understand it. well , for example, speaking of the prime minister's report. after all, we are discussing it. we are not just a report, but also the opinion of those who will be expressed on the results of this report, on the one hand, on the other hand, each of the delegates, and this was at all previous all belarusians. the parties to the meeting have the right to make specific proposals, and here the entire belarusian people's assembly will give instructions on the most important points, in which, as you rightly noted. they are mandatory all state structures, when speaking about voting, the law stipulates that the chairmen of his deputy and the presidium are elected by secret ballot, and the possibility of open voting is expressed by the vote

of each of the delegates for or against. i think that's because it's conditioned. it e will provide an opportunity, firstly, to promptly resolve the issue from the other side. uh, fundamentally, that is, each of those present has the right to express their opinion, as delegates, which is part of this meeting. is it possible here so directly ask the question how much will the state's vns cost? this is, in principle, separately stipulated and repeatedly stated that all e delegates. with the exception of the chairman and his deputies will perform their duties under the public mandate, i am sure that this will be a minimum amount, which is less than that of other similar organizations. here directly. you, as a minister, supervise an area that, probably, for me personally, to a certain extent , is not so much sick as i am interested in this area sphere of political parties? well, at one time

i had to work quite closely with this direction. here according to the laws for half a year. after the entry into force, the ministry of justice must re-register all parties in our country, especially looking back at the 20th year, where let's be frank, the vast majority of registered political parties did not show themselves at all in protecting the state system. at best, it was silent. that's how big the chances are that all the political parties 15 today in the country yes will pass this relisting. i wonder if we will have couch parties. i'm far from predicting. i am obliged to predict the situation on the basis of the situation that is developing today. yes, on the whole, i believe that the number of parties will decrease. yes, three or four parties. why confirmation? why

because here is the law that has been adopted to date, it tightens the conditions. uh, the creation and functioning of these public associations, the party cannot be a pr-organization party signboard agree the signboard of the party should be a public structure that makes efforts for the development of our state society. uh-huh and this law. uh, next steps. uh, party nomenklatura. the one that positions itself today. as you said, the couch party fellow travelers will show what degree of trust the citizens of the republic of belarus have in these structures today and those who really enjoy authority today will remain on the road of party building. on the one hand, our people have a program,

which will allow them to develop together with our state in various fields. whether it is sports charity management economic other areas. in addition, predict the situation if we see those enterprising people, of whom we have a lot. the parties should become a source for the personnel potential of our state with a social lift, yes, that's right, after all. i want to hear, first of all , these criteria are mandatory criteria that are already clearly spelled out and tightened in according to reality, as it should be. well, let's call these criteria again. what should be the party in order for it to be re-registered in the law, due to the universal goal for

all parties, regardless of the ultimate goal and functioning for these purposes. there is nothing supernatural these goals are due to the fact that all ports should maintain the constitutionality of the system should not promote terrorism. extremism should not work to undermine. uh, the society that exists in the republic of belarus here in general, universal purpose. i said, in addition, there is a so-called. come on, let's call them arithmetic this membership in the party is an adult citizen who permanently resides on the territory of the republic of belarus , the number for the initiative to create them, e, the party must be at least 5,000 people and for existence. in any case, at regular intervals it will be checked exactly this way and there should be created organizational structures in all regions of the republic of belarus, that is, in all

regional centers and in the city of minsk in each from the regions, the membership must be at least 100 people. at the same time, the organizational structure should be in at least 1/3 of the district centers and districts of the city of minsk in a platoon - this sounds loud. well, therefore, it must dirty the thing to correspond to those positions, what is a party? i more than support this approach, because when there are three people in a party, why are they called sofas, do they all fit on one sofa? yes, but then, at the same time , the bsdpg bsdg party sounds loud and so on. and here they are christian democrats somewhere or else somebody. so he came up with a name for himself, and i like it the most. you know, this is the concept of the organizing committee for the creation of the party. yes, here they are, for 10-15-20 years, hiding behind the concept of the murcommittee and that's it. but well, okay,

more or less to understand the criterion, i 'll add something else. i think how it is not without interesting. this. although. i am sure that those who will be engaged in party building. they are aware of this, that the financing of the party, uh, foreign organizations by states is strictly prohibited, but this is one of the reasons why the party can be liquidated. everything is reasonable, everything is pragmatic , no one can influence from the outside, especially abroad, on the activities of our political structures, you understand, uh. here we are so shy sometimes to say those things that are obviously overdue, well, you see, who finances the party, he dances it. there is nothing new in your phrase, therefore, no one should dance our party, only the state. why is the state of sergeyevich one more

thing, because, uh, our state organizations and individuals, perhaps party support and set amount. uh, 1,000 basals personally per year with the possible funding of these organizations, that is , there is a possibility, but again this should meet the interests that are laid down in universal goals. well, in the same place, if such an interesting wording the state can also support the party and information, yes , and logical yes, and in other ways such a good, vague wording. i really like it because it's real. and why not support when the structure works? well initiates some very important events for the country, act, and so on. why would n't he be supported quite normally? and sergei nikolayevich, at least one political party, will certainly become more. well, now active events are taking place, the committee for the creation of the party was already meeting, belarus yes , finally, she announced her political

ambitions. at the same time, a public association will remain. yes, yes, these are the same communists, they are also sometimes members of belarus, so whether there will be legal conflicts here, and i in general, to be honest, i want to understand how it will be, well, let's say , the public association political party will coexist , people who are, uh, members of another party and civil servants. can they become members of a political party, belarus, these are the questions. i would like to be a little more specific, i'll start with the final question. civil servants may be members of the party, but the constitution specifies that military personnel. uh, the judiciary is representatives of the state committee. controlled organizations by members political parties could not, so here the answer is very simple. it is set out in article 36 of the constitution theoretically the minister of justice has the right to join a political

party. i understand correctly, legally. yes, i answer the previous question. i will say the following is the formation of the party. and uh, i believe that this is the situation that is developing today, it is very wisely considered by the leadership of the public association, belarus and the potential that this public association has today. really. on my opinion allows us to create a party that will be an active player in the political field and will set the tone for the uh undertakings that exist in our country, starting with patriotic education and ending with small deeds in the regions in organizations, so here is the experience that has been accumulated he really should e enter the next stage of development and the formation

of the initiative is quite. it is necessary and will only be useful for our state, in fact, i would like to wish you really good luck for this to take place. together with our guides, you will learn something that you would never have guessed to google, one of the most famous names of the belaya vezha tower , although in its history it is white. she never was. by the way, who did not know this particular tower is depicted on the five-ruble banknote of the legend, historical facts and many unusual sights. belarus has a certain purpose when an arrow or a spear gets here. they slide off

, change direction, and so on. by the way, this year? belarus 24 let's pay attention together to the events that have become extremist activity in europe as a global catalyst for chaos, provocations to inter-religious hatred is legal, then after that we will look for the cause of what happened and we will analyze who tends to talk a lot, but

do nothing, europe was multicultural and tolerant only in words stupidity and fear, liberals do not depend on it , and this is different in the author's project is different. watch new releases on belarus 24 tv channel. our participants will give their knowledge not only to peers, but also adults about people and the world in fifth grade. we went through that the moon attracts water and because of the moon there is an ebb tide option, yes, because i read that nefertiti was the queen of ancient egypt, in order to get into the superfinal they need to be quick-witted. i am sure that 1 mm is less than 1 m 1,000 times, because a is 100 cm in one meter, and 10 mm in 1 cm, have an excellent memory and think logically. i answered no, because

i know exactly what anchovy is. this is a fish purple or magenta color invented by the dates, and it is a shade of purple. as far as i know, watch an intellectual entertainment show. i know on tv channel belarus 24. there is one more aspect that, in my opinion, needs to be discussed. well, again , the normative document is adopted, the law is adopted, civil society. yes, what interests me most is non-profit organizations. i am a supporter of the grant system in general. yes , when there is a whole system of ngos that are given a task, and we will give them a task when the government gives the task. well, that is, under strict control, on that this money is being spent and they

absolutely clearly perform certain function tasks or implement projects, because it is impossible to hang up all the tasks there, from cruelty to animals to active work on the internet networks , on government agencies. this is my opinion it's not a secret that the massive emergence of ngos working on western grants it is always a harbinger of a colored revolution if we remember georgia 20,000 public associations of ngos yes. ukraine on the eve of maidan 70,000 public associations and non-profit organizations kazakhstan 16 and so on and so forth , on the eve of the twentieth year, we already had a public vision or initiatives financed from abroad, which were covered up. with seemingly plausible goals, and then, to put it mildly, they took to the streets and shook the country. what lessons have we learned from the behavior of ngos and what conclusions should we draw? how

should we carry out this control and work with them control, we will comply with the legislation of the republic of belarus and, as you rightly said, those public associations which e financed themselves abroad, which, under a plausible pretext , set plausible goals, but in fact were engaged in undermining the state , today serious work has been carried out to verify them even where the requirements of the law are not met. they were eliminated by the decision of the supreme court of the republic of belarus, saying that it is the national legislation, and these are the normative legal acts that are adopted today, in particular, the law on civil society. it's literally there. clear and understandable it is written that civil society is citizens of the republic of belarus, foreign citizens and stateless persons, permanently residing on the territory of the republic of belarus

and fulfilling those norms of legislation that are accepted. in addition, a characteristic is given by the subject of civil society. but, speaking about civil society, approaches to these concepts, it is probably necessary to state the following fact, after all. uh, in general, the approach to civil society, the one that we applied in this law, it is very different from those, uh principles according to which e western philosophers and ideologists approached civil society and no one as an integral part - this is civil society. on the one side. it was an opposition to the state from the other side. it was the theory that the state should provide. assistance to the subjects of civil society in general of civil society, while the rights remain only with the subjects of civil society, and the duties only in the state

are perfectly our law. e, first of all , they state the principles and main tasks for interaction between civil society and the state, and this is probably its uniqueness. the main single goal of civil society and states should strive to preserve sovereignty, state integrity and preserve peace and social stability in our country, therefore , probably, this position is especially reproachful critics and annoying, but as for the position on non-profit organizations, organizations must not be said the next, again , a barrier was created for similar actions that were previously also in terms of financing from the outside foreign countries and in happiness. e tasks, that is, in fact, all those, er, universal

goals, which he enumerated in relation to the parties. they are also listed for public associations and organizations. and that is, uh, the appearance of any goal that hmm will have a destructive effect on stability in our society will be allowed. uh, stop the activities of such a structure. today i notice that this topic is still a little bit. revives the basics of the registered initiative. yes , and young people try their hand at charity projects there constructively and in for the good of the country, thank god, but what ngos are appearing in belarus now and what niches are still free, in your opinion, today the number of such organizations as you have already noted , about 300 organizations are developing the women's

movement. it is always a matter of personality, because as soon as personalities begin to appear in the leadership of any movement active it immediately gives. results. it is significant speaking about the international society in our country, it should be noted that more than 90 public organizations unite various kinds. there are more than 90 nationalities in our small country. by the way, for youth organizations, it is also necessary to say this is more than 250 organizations, including children's, uh, which unite representatives of the youth, and these are uh, the main directions are patriotic, military-patriotic somehow. uh, 20 also became uh, hmm a catalyst for the development of such organizations, what do we lack? you know, i won’t say it right off the bat, because the range of those public associations that we

now have, probably, firstly, reflects the realities and thoughts of our citizens. secondly , here, facing, again, returning to the previous question. as for non-profit organizations, those that have lost their functions were with such names and some even difficult tasks. just illuminate, and some sports, even to my regret, it's me, like i have a sport relationship. i have not heard of such sports and have not seen how people do it, therefore. in this situation, there should probably not be, first of all, an artificial push to create these organizations. secondly, our modern youth is a women's movement. they themselves see these niches and, you see, we do not prevent the creation of such organizations by the ministry of justice and those structural units that are intended for this. on the contrary, they

provide assistance, including in the preparation of documents and in methodological support. activities. well, you see, uh, i'm a supporter of the fact that the department of justice definitely should not be involved in stimulating the creation of public organizations. it should, in fact, intelligently regulate these initiatives. and not what to prompt here realize here to create it completely. it seems to me that it is not necessary to put either a cover, but let's take one more moment. this is what concerns the electoral legislation. yes, it’s also a big plast, in fact, but photo and video shooting. banned that's all that the opponents of the authorities noticed. what about selfies with ballots from the booth, you can’t do now and you can’t send it all that they noticed. and here are the amendments to the electoral code. you would note that there are quite key ones, a good proverb, everyone talks about what hurts him. well, they also say yes

, beauty is in the eyes, looking by and large, so those who have made such an expression. hmm, they don’t understand, uh, the meaning of the electoral process in general and, uh, the degree of influence of the electoral process on uh, the development of the state, so i can note. i would note that i changed the criteria. to the deputies everything is absolutely reasonable, and uh, pragmatically, that is, a person who, uh, has some kind of benefits on the territory of other states, cannot be a deputy. well, this is the same for the status of a presidential candidate, it directly relates absolutely correctly. you made the phrase, who finances a public organization, someone dances it. and here is the same situation. if you are at the same time your own country, if you are devoted to your state, then you definitely will not look for an em jar of jam on foreign territory. well let's talk straight if u you have dual citizenship, second citizenship. yes, if you have different

cards give you another year from another state of opportunity, there is unhindered travel and so on. well, that is, there are certain forms that have been playing me in a match for two decades; this immediately becomes a barrier to being elected to the same parliament or to the post of the second president. i would like to point this out in terms of the organizational part of the electoral process. this is that for the first time in 2024 there will be a single election day and in preparation for making such a decision by preparing a proposal. everything was calculated repeatedly, both in terms of the calendar, and in terms of the algorithm process itself. here's the holding. it's a rather complicated process, when one day is chosen.

uh, several categories of deputies from me to assure that this process is thought out this process , uh, calculated and all conditions will be created for this day to pass in an organized manner and bring the results that should be the result should be one, those people should be elected , which are really are patriots of our state, in fact, it will be like that. it is good for the whole country, because for the first time we will vote on the single voting day , well, sergey nikolayevich ask the last philosophical question, probably, i still need to say that everyone now needs to carefully read all these adopted regulatory documents, all these laws, because there are many nuances and see what interests you, for sure. it will be possible for everyone to ask the last near-philosophical question. i often i tell employees that you criticize, offer , offer to do or act. now everyone has the opportunity to make the history of the country. everyone has a job for the benefit

of civil society as part of the party, delegating to leave the vns. yes, that's what you want a person to do. uh, to really get your hands on these tools. get into the composite organs and what qualities do you really need to possess for a sufficiently long time? in the troops today i came to the conclusion that the defender of the fatherland, the defender of the national security, in fact, is each of us. why i will explain, because there are enough threats to national security in the economic sphere, the social sphere, in the legal one. well and so on i will not enumerate