pull to remember by quotes, the famous white dew the viewer will be able today at 21:30 on tv channel belarus 3 before that on the cultural channel will show one of the last big interviews with the writer at 21:05. watch the tuning fork program. the faces of those who burned the belarusian villages and the names of the punishers who killed the children of the old women after the war worked as teachers in schools, born in the ussr and who became nazi accomplices in their place of service of the ses battalion. they participated in almost every large-scale punitive expedition. after the war, the traitors of the motherland searched all over the union and were judged in belarus where the punishers committed their crimes. look, in the second part of the film, the punishers are zirli wankers from the no statute of limitations series of a joint project of the agency or the news and the hospital security committee. tomorrow, on march 1, before the panorama on belarus 1 and belarus 24 tv channels

, the state security committee of belarus, together with the tv news agency bill, tv and radio companies present a project on the genocide of the belarusian people during the great patriotic war. percussion the strength of the third reich, the executioners in the form of the ss, it was formed with the assistance of the ss leader of the ss heinrich the anthem the bloody route of the punishers of the der lewangers of belarus left in its bloody shame on the territory of seven regions, if we are talking about the pre-war administration 24 born to destroy against whom the elite unit of nazi germany fought

watch on wednesday, march 1, belarus 1 and belarus 24 in front of the panorama. well, new information from my colleagues at 15:00 on our air. all the best. uranishne forest

makes its way, the sun is flowing so hidden breath, at least not cut off this judgment, that the trunk is not large. hello , i welcome everyone who is with us now, i am very glad to see the guests of our today's program of this edition. well, biden in kiev then goes to warsaw and makes a statement , by the way, nothing new, but nonetheless. apparently a very important message. vladimir putin, in his message the day before, placed important accents . well, of course, one way or another, we will

touch on all this today, but this one listing, even in 2 days, is enough to understand what the topic is today. security. this is question number one. and listen, mostly western countries , ukrainians talk a lot about this these days on the 22nd 23rd 24th 25th, something terrible will definitely happen. here is your prediction. this is another such hysteria in order to continue to pump up the heat and what is already overheated or true. here it is worth tuning in to something serious ivanovich we see that ukraine has lost the initiative, and there are special military operations in a strategic military operation. so she needs to cheer up her powers her means herself cheer up. here are the agreements that they allegedly reached on supplies. they have different weapons. uh, biden's visit to kiev is everything from this opera, therefore, in the near future, in my opinion, what should be expected is

that the shelling will intensify. e donbass, e, the territory that is under the control of russian forces is the territory of russia, in my opinion it will be that. uh, a clear course has been taken to escalate and continue the conflict of some changes, for the time being, there can’t be any objective way, there can’t be no forces and no means they have in order for radical changes. in the near future here in the coming days until spring, if it’s possible that your data is really the day after tomorrow it’s already been exactly a year since the special military operation began, so when we assume that it could be worse, probably nothing can be worse than war, because there is still and unfortunately, judging by the rhetoric that the nuclear powers chose, a couple of terrible options still remain. well, taking into account the fact that hmm, the kiev regime consists of lakes. naturally, from my point of view, some kind of surprise was not in store. eh,

the russian side, indeed. eh, how said my colleague? there will not be any progress, because they are bogged down in positional wars to the side, but uh, some kind of hmm direct action, perhaps they will even carry out on the territory of russia. these are pure predictions. we are living in an information war. and in times of thousands of fakes every day, so naturally. these key dates are always used for information confrontation to pump up some date every month, something will happen, the second. of course, to this date, there may be some provocations , some actions in order to again use them in the information space, which is the anniversary of what we did. this is the third, but at the same time, war is not a comic book for us, unfortunately, many people have such a date in their heads, everyone gathered, went in one day. something happened so there is no war. it's a hard war - it's a long war.

this death war is a tactic and no one e acts in one day and one hour. therefore, i do not expect something beyond global, but some provocations on this day is quite possible, given the fact that by twenty. on the twenty-fourth day, it is supposed to voice a certain plan, a, which ukraine calls peaceful, taking into account the fact that china, in its conflict with the united states a for global domination , is going to present its peace initiative and, very, clearly, is going to present it. these are big prerequisites for the fact that something before this should be. well, plus to everything we must always be ready for anything, even in not very large operations, because not very large operations of stupid people in the information war can be inflated to any scandal due to exclusively information technologies, therefore the appearance of high-profile informational occasions these days is very, very likely another

question, what they will carry for, uh, even a short-term perspective is not necessary. this will be at least some development, but a high-profile informational occasion can happen. this is the context in which we are discussing. e issues of national security. on monday, the president had a meeting with this security of the republic, belarus and two very important areas discussed and interesting is the project of an updated concept of national security and such a new one for the belarusian rumor. people's militia. here, if you look at what caught on the most, what caused the greatest resonance. and here's what we noticed. this, of course, these are the words of the president that the belarusian measure-love is not a synonym for sacrifice, immediately the message is that every man should and not only a man should be able to handle weapons in order to to protect at least one's own family. and what caught the eye of many was that in

the key discussion of national security touched on the topic of values ​​and traditions. that is, it is also around the discussion of security topics, but at the same time everything, and our concept will be open, that is, anyone, including from abroad, will be able to get acquainted with it. but alexander ivanovich, what is the main thing you note in this new document updated here it was clearly stated that 70% of the concept is updated, but its structure is nonetheless. she has been preserved the same as the current one, she answers. exactly this. key to the four critical questions in terms of security, what to protect against what to protect? where to protect and with what forces and means to protect this is all clearly their current concept, but in my opinion. eh, if we are talking about a project and a very important statement was made that this is an open concept, these are

fundamental questions. it will be submitted for public discussion in the near future. uh, it's that there's a new quality filling. we we know that national security is a state of protection of national interests from internal and external ones. but the goal is added in the project very clearly for the further progressive development of the belarusian society, that is, the goal is clearly traced further. uh, if we answer questions. what to protect against threats? e in the project e, the concept of clearly marked types of image risks, challenges and direct threats. that is the stage of origin. this is the risk of the stage of formation and development - this is a challenge and directly threats. this is what exists for e. society needs protection, speaking of spheres, a biological sphere

is added there and i won’t specify for everyone. it’s clear how many epidemics we have experienced over the past decade , episode and uh, various challenges and threats, including those that include laboratories around our country in the post-soviet space, but they talk about national interests. you, too, in your e prelude to this question, noted that it very clearly emphasizes the fact that such concepts in strategic national interests, as the ideology of the belarusian state, patriotic education, the people of belarus as an object of protection. and this is all connected precisely with the goal of ensuring national security. and in general. if we say that it is very important that our country, its originality lies in the fact that once we wanted to be a bridge between the east. and the west, and this is a strategic goal and we still have it, but the current situation is today. she says that, unfortunately,

one must be able to to find, uh, forces and means to develop in our society in our state. uh, i'll just finish a second and uh , specifically speaking of strategic national interests. we need to note that only if every member of the belarusian society deals with issues of ensuring national security, then our national security will be ensured. everything is rightly said with every word of consent, but people are watching us on tv, what do they want, every belarusian wants to live peacefully, so that there is no war, so that in there were no terrorist attacks in the country, so that no one swayed the situation to calmly live to develop. by the way, the europeans want this document. the one we are discussing now is the concept of national security, the law on the people's militia , the most important thing is that it comes first from life, and the real conditions in which our country lives now and the second, you can write a million documents. he's fine the most important thing now for

all these years, especially last year. we do everything for national security, then we strengthen it and why should we do it? again, you want peace. always be ready for war, and the president spoke about this and met journalists halfway. and here is a clear parallel example. eh, with the great patriotic war, someone did not understand her. for example, i understood very well when the ussr was chattering for many years and they said that we would never enter the rise of the war, the president would say such mistakes in belarus, for example, no one will ever repeat. we don't threaten anyone. actually. we never claimed any there was and is no territory of aggression on our part, but to believe in fairy tales that you do not threaten us. we will be no more. we will discuss more. probably he is biden, it is worth russia, we did not threaten, who is our main threat to is there is the united states of america is there? ukraine that's who is the number one threat for us, i would , most importantly, the threat - this is internal

stability in the country, no one from the outside will ever win belarus. that's the most important thing - this is the strengthening, which we are doing , of the internal unity of internal political stability. now she really strengthened, because i'm sorry not one enemy, never destroy us. and yet, a colleague will say a lot about this and says and correctly says the informational oleg sergeevich, look. here we have poland, which is like such a disposable jock. here, uh, asteroids are driving communications, they are pumping up muscles. if it goes on like this, she'll drive herself to cardiac arrest. we have closes the borders. we have the united states of america, which belarus for the first time introduced more necessary thing into its concept of ukraine's security. here the fact that the poles are now pumping up arms , what they do not do, the borders of the polish lilits, do not think about one thing. if they drag the whole of europe into a war, they won't succeed. so poland, for example, got involved, belarus. if suddenly they would

have succeeded sometime, that it would not work, and they and someone would serve time, then there would be no more. an hour later, no one understands from the polish politicians and, for example, the lithuanian president, who said, let's go to the red line. he does not understand that in 20 minutes there will be no lithuania. it's just this language trick who is for us, poland's chief physician. uh, the polish people are not our enemy, but poland itself is an aggressive state that today threatens our national security. and we say this openly, we warn polish politicians about this, that we will never tolerate it. we see it, we watch it, and we have something to answer. why do they ask the question, because from year to year, until the twentieth year, we said that we are peace-loving, we are, and so it is, but with all this, if we deceive ourselves and do not clearly designate for ourselves as, for example , the same americans. they say we have russia we have china belarus they fit in hostile should be understood as hostility,

yes, hostile means, but here we must also take into account that politics is a little more complicated. that is, we understand this general trend that we see. we must understand who, if anything, this is within these countries themselves . quite right. i will talk about the information component, when the issue was discussed, including on the people's militia. i had one question, and is done on the tradition of our message ideas. based on what , it is assumed that everyone will protect their home, and, based on this, the overall national security will be strengthened accordingly. i have a question, taking into account the fact that in the global information space today there is a clear message from the west through culture through the media through and new media that individualization. i would even say

optimization. a person within society is a positive process, given that saving yourself and everything will be fine. as a last resort , you can move to new zealand and when this is promoted very, very much for a lot of money. how much money will we spend on ensuring that our correct traditional other values ​​​​of protecting the home of our family of our hearth will be present in the information space. this is the main question, in my opinion, because we hope that our traditional values ​​remain unchanged. unfortunately, they are under direct attack under and they are just under threat. their they are just trying to shake this base, and returning to poland

, polish politicians think very strongly what to do in the autumn elections, and taking into account the fact that they know very well that the current party, law and justice in the autumn elections, will be opposed by non-russians. not in any way. it is not we who will implant in germany through e, let them through e, the same swabians, and so on and so on, they need to present as much as possible, but a vivid media image. it doesn't matter by what means, so today to grow up for the voters to domestic market, because they cannot boast of economic success. they cannot boast with belarus. this is what effect it has, that is, there are those in poland who support it in every possible way. look, closing the border. they denote an external enemy, an external enemy is always for internal use. moreover, on

an external enemy. you can always find an internal enemy and say you are against the fight against external enemies, which are expressed in the closure of borders. so you are against us internal enemy. this is for internal use yesterday, if we go back to putin's address, and he clearly divided the western elite. yes, biden personified our enemy, that is, putin was looking for our enemy even more clearly in his appeal. giving too big vague definitions for the enemy today means not uniting this weak association. here, if everything is clear and personified. yes, unfortunately today with such simple things, you need to work with the audience, it comes faster. just through information processes, the effect is greater one. that's just the nuance the border was closed. they once arrived bytes. it is still in front of

the outside public for america poland has named its national idea for the upcoming elections. he said more america in europe everyone heard it. just think, poland will protect the united states in europe. this is completely. this means that the national interest and the border were closed , it is correct to talk about information issues. a byte arrived and shows more. we are ready to close the border for everything, to do anything. look at me. which one greater poland, we will destroy everything in europe here. this is preparation for the elections - this is information technology, but on the other hand. unfortunately for me and all belarusians, this is the surrender of polish sovereignty and independence completely for today. this ruling polish elite is not independent at all. she is completely in her hands. listen to the objectors big america in poland it means first of all in europe yes it means less germany it means less france and the uk is no longer in

europe and not in the european union as a result a british project to cut off germany and france that meet their economic needs from russian resources. it is exactly the same performed in poland , external markers and their internal interests have converged. at the same time, one and the same message works perfectly for an external audience, like a connection with america with a big strong friend, but it works the same way inside poland, as the most important thing, yes, the poles are the first. the germans in chief are not germans, if we return to the concept of national security and the second issue that they discussed closely connected. this is the people's militia. why is this important for us, a fairly new phenomenon from ananavich, as you see , everyone should deal with security, therefore those who are in the unarmed forces are not in law enforcement agencies, nor in state bodies. uh, seniors are handicapped with skills that can u wield weapons and

fight. that's what the people's militia, that is, uh, in every locality. eh, there was an opinion here. so i read in the press that it is in the villages and in the cities. it is too the most will be, especially the protection of public order, some public functions of the fulfillment of life, it will not stop there. yes , on approach. if uh, god forbid some kind of armed conflict will arise directly to the front line. everything will be clearly regulated there, there are military administrations and everything else. and somewhere in the rear. to maintain public order , public functions, well, a sabotage reconnaissance group to counteract the identification of them, to prevent the facts of looting. here we see even earthquake. in turkey, there was a fact of looting at once, there are different people , therefore, these functions are in the first place, therefore it all acquires a national character, but it is necessary to lay the regulatory framework for organizational conditions in order for this to work immediately. we sat and thought,

how can we implement all this, how can we get it? whom and how to do it all, yuriy elast declares that the working mechanism is and has always declared his neutral status , and we always really, as experts said, want to live in peace and harmony with our neighbours. and well, taking into account the fact that the ring around our perimeter is now shrinking , in fact, uh, all countries except russian ones. federations have become unfriendly from lithuania to ukraine, then the best guarantee of independence of sovereignty and such neutrality, of course, is the best guarantee is appropriate training. and here i recall the example of israel, which is also in a hostile environment, so there and uh, they took such measures, including the military service

of not only male but also female representatives, but uh, our western partners, they just don't leave us choices. we must follow this path so that, as oleg sergeevich correctly said, be ready when, after this chatter about reconciliation, they try to strike. and we will be ready for the second question. and why don’t we say one more thing, it’s important who said that there are no people in belarus who want to defend their country themselves, i travel around the country. i will tell you that there is a request. it’s just that we sometimes orient ourselves on the internet to the opinion of some hipster who drinks zybitskaya beer and this is considered. here are all the youth of belarus not true. go to the outback and chat there. i'm not saying that everything in this direction is good, but willing people who want can defend their country and want to learn this and be in this people's militia. this is the second point, of course. every man should be able to defend his country. these are all

countries. now they understand differently. there will be no military security, and the third point is what calms. by the way, i will tell you people far from the army, far from the special services. when they don't know anything. and when nothing you know that you are afraid, therefore the weight of the components is informational work, what my colleague says explain explain show speak and the second moment when he delves into it even with the help of these collections with the help of these teachings that are carried out in the regions. when he comes out of there, he understands how it all really looks. and the myths are crumbling fakes and people are already on a different level the other day we saw that there was a meeting of two presidents alexander lukashenko , vladimir putin, it is clear that they discussed issues. there mutual assurance joint security. it was based on the peace theme. look at the trade turnover of 50 billion for 80% of the implemented allied import substitution programs, as if specifically to show, look, we have a global agenda. well , it was very well seen from the foreign journalists who

spoke with the president. they convey the mood through their e, politicians and their regimes. uh, they have this question endlessly. this is the president's answer. they are through one re- request. well, when will belarus enter e, war in e ukraine why do they want it so much? why is this topic for them it does not hear the answer. they don't care and so on. here's an informational story, yes. well, no matter what the belarusian president answers, anyway, i will ask exactly in fact , this is not the first time we see that people come here not to hear answers in order to ask a question in our space. after all. in front of him in front of them in front of everyone now in front of all the western media here, i do not like the word everyone by everyone, because it is a very big generalization, but before all western media whatever they are, even the american republican democratic ones face the issue of the information presence of control of someone else's information space.

today, through the institute of editors-in-chief, and these media, the idea of ​​confrontation is being promoted, what is good for the americans in confrontation not on their own territory, yes to everyone what is good about the constant presence of the topic of war outside their own field in a foreign information field, yes, they all come here to convey tension to us no, so that everyone to bring nervousness with their question, because they are well aware that yes, they control a certain proportion of space, a very large one too large for the external factor in the new media, but at the same time they know that they are less present in the classical media. yes, they have such a way out, they meet with the first person, whom i trust here in order to express at least a brief interrogative manner their dishes, runs from

an uncomfortable question, turned around and went on autopilot. and let's listen. how the president answered ready together with the russians to fight with the territory of belarus or that only in one bye listen if at least one soldier from there with a gun comes to our territory to kill my people. this applies not only to ukraine. this also applies to our other neighbors, who behave even more inadequately, if they commit aggression against belarus, the answer will be the most cruel , the most cruel, and the war will take on a completely different character. if the meeting of the president by journalists were really shown on all european tv channels on american ones, i now fantasize. i understand what it is fantasy. but it would be the effect of an exploding bomb, because all this spoon that

was poured on the ears of the europeans is still pouring about the fact that belarus is some kind of aggressive state. it's all collapsed, because look, it's coming. maidan kiev biden. he talks so much about the war. if you wanted peace. so i said, not here 3 days ago, even here i said back , he would have said what he came out and said from 4 p.m. today, as i am in kiev, not a single rocket will fly to the donbass. i am in minsk for six hours in the palace of independence near alexandra nikolayevich lukashenko putin flies there and we started again in the world, and they did not show aleksandrovich, they showed an amazing fragment in europe. now i will definitely ask you and i to look at it, then we will continue, of course, discussing it. this occasion to communicate with the belarusian president gave foreign journalists the opportunity to go to the border with ukraine to talk, including with the military, and here is one of the foreign journalists. he approached our military and asked and showed in his report. if you have to fight, you are amazingly ready there,

let's just hear the answer. i don't know who will be now. this is how we will gnaw. but no. well, and, accordingly, they fully confirmed their template, which , in fact, they are building wild hordes from the tail since the time of tolkien, yes, which will come and gnaw. give money to the americans. they will cover us, we could show and they could show something else, but they showed exactly what, uh, actually why they went for us. why are they still closed to our perception? why for us? we're going to bite, right? this is also obviously sarcastic. moment of the subtlety of the language, and for simple translations of english connotation. why is this

moment torn out without previous dialogue? after all , this is clearly not the first question that has been asked. yes, the same journalist who performed the interview with the president now has 7 minutes left. not the first day, working in a structure that was at one time, but created in order not to take notes during the interview, because he already knew that he said that everything was written. and why are the borders closing here it sounded, but i am supplemented because we were visa-free regimes for poland too, when tens of thousands of citizens come here, they see what is happening here, that the economy is developing peacefully, people’s eyes are burning, because they work for themselves and for their country. and they have prospects for normal peaceful prospects. and when they come, it's all 10 times more, because there are relatives , familiar friends, but they closed the border and

the militarization of poland continues. eh why? u here, uh, very important. uh, a special military operation in ukraine, because our fugitives answer why do western journalists ask such a question, because they made a bet on the defeat of russia and then they will take on belarus ukraine is strategically important, and belarus is five times more important than uh, ukraine that's the answer why western journalists ask such oleg sergeevich touched on the topic, after all, several times already about the fact that the president invited biden and, indeed, many immediately turned into a joke that the president is trolling biden. come here, but it seems to me that i just agree with alex many people are confused by sergeevich, because this is the shortest way to stop the bloodshed on the ukrainian front. we are well aware that this is never in the interests of the united states of america, not even once. and that's why they told the presentations about it. of course they won't, but still.

it wasn't trolling. and what does it mean to be ironic, if on our land in the same palace of independence, e, the signing of the minsk agreements took place? i don't think the chancellor of germany or the president of france uh, less status than the president of the united states so, of course, president lukashenko proposed the most e. hmm, the shortest way is the easiest. e, means, e option of the decision of questions. after all, it would seem such a complex conglomeration of how to figure out how it means that expert groups work , some councils are not government organizations, but the key is e, which means in peace negotiations and e lies precisely in that. is. yes, uh, that means, uh, invite the initiators of this conflict, the initiator of this conflict. these are the anglo-saxons in particular the usa

because the kiev regime is controlled from the outside and we will not repeat this evidence for the hundredth time, it is too obvious, respectively, president lukashenko as an experienced politician with, uh, a brilliant instinct. he suggested the shortest way . biden arrives, putin arrives, they shake hands, they discuss , they draw something. yes, they agree. in no case can this be viewed through the prism of irony, this is a real option. here, yes. and you will see when, sooner or later, this option will be implemented, because they will probably come to an agreement anyway. superpowers. well, maybe it will be electricity . lukashenka heard in the united states of america the other day, who commented on this. donald trump said that putin is president? there would be no 24 hours of war. let's listen to what arguments he accompanied everything. people i literally on the same night

as i find out my pobeda i will call two people , you know who i won’t tell putin and zelensky. them. we need to meet. we'll meet, i guarantee i can work things out. i know exactly what to say to them, i will tell this one to the other the second and i will tell you better reach an agreement. we will conclude an agreement within 24 hours. but we propose an initiative, and trump plagiarizes it. this suggests that this is an absolutely sound and pragmatic initiative, and it can really ensure peace between the two countries when european politicians begin to lie that there is no way to peace now. lukashenka understands everything perfectly, realizing the situation shows once again. it's all this way it's simple. you just don't want to go through it. that's all. that's the truth let's continue the conversation. so, finally, we are trying to understand, after all , for whom biden came, and in kiev, who needed this meeting more, is called with us. we continue the biden in kiev uh

surprised. we weren't exactly surprised. no, sorry, yes, i probably wasn’t surprised , because biden had, but one chance to go to aga and uh, walk around the polluted yes american polluted territories and at least try to explain something to trump’s root electorate. as a matter of fact, in agai, yes, to people who do not earn very much, and then they will also live in infected area, and their contaminated water to come. yes, as long as it's not in aha, that's the trick for him. it was the day of the presidents of the united states. well, this is the official name of the day of the presidents, he could spend it either with his electorate. and where he gets the maximum points. he

did this to his electorate looking at uh, foreign policy or could spend it with a stranger with the republican electorate. specifically , he lags at home and gets a hat. he weighed up and not the most he decided he decided his headquarters just where he could get the best press the best and biggest press. he was able to get in kiev about what, in fact, and it was not necessary , uh, to look for two options. the only question was whether he would get the same good press from warsaw. yes, he would most likely get yesterday's. eh, the last one. well, the first comments, after his speech, said that yes, the people went in, because his speech was built on the simplest repetition of what was already known without overworking. plus there were kids at the end. the children were chinese e do not return, typical ukrainians. and yes, this is a sign, we

are working in a system of signs. we need get used to. sorry, this is volume. we need to get used to the fact that we work simultaneously in the real plane and in the system of signs. and if now for some politician the system of signs gives more points, he works with the system of signs. what does it mean for us? here, let's practically conclude that the system of signs symbolism absolutely supports. we see that in general western culture is involved in this. not only, by the way, western, yes, and what symbols should we then use to generate new ones or raise ours from this choice. and this. we return to the first question, do we want to create a new symbol system? or should we really invest in promoting traditional values, as sad as it sounds, but the simplest thing. i, we are the mother of the world, that's what we wrote in cursive there

in schools in kindergartens, the first words that we drew. now all this works not through words. it works through images of emotions. yes we need to come up with new advertising that would appeal to the younger generation when you started talking about that the people's militia will rely on adults even, well, even the old people yes, that's right, but when we talk about the example of israel, the example of israel begins with what the example of israel begins with the fact that everyone knows that they will go into the army at a young age the age of the kindergarten is quite right and when the first political magazine is designed for younger students. this is fine. yes, it is necessary to work with a younger audience and yes , through the language that they have, maybe it is not necessary to come up with a new system values. we need to invent a new language, the language of images, the language of emotions. which would now be perceived by a young youth audience

, which would give the effect of trump when he speaks in short, clear words, he, when he speaks with politicians, he uses longer words when he speaks in public space. he defines short words biden tries, knowing that he speaks badly , tries to keep silent altogether. everything in the system of views is tense, or and so on. yes, it sounds funny, but they work through emotions in order to involve young people, among other things, one moment not for the first time, the united states of america stakes in solving internal problems on external factors. so was the centennial visit. biden. this is another business visit. listen to me today ukraine and europe are the main source of income for the united states of america this year. they've made millions of dollars and they want to make millions more. i came to watch investments, so that everything would spin and spin , launched ukraine to the last ukrainian.

fight came to warsaw, prepare the poles to the last pole. close borders. come on, choke. we are the money he will come to the white house and tell the representatives of the military-industrial complex. how many more contracts? how many millions? how much more land will they take? how many businesses is money. now i absolutely agree about the meanings, for example, watching the speech of the president of russia, i was more interested in the non-military component, which was mused all over. and what's the point? what are the meanings? what new prices have become benchmarks for development within russia will be in the coming decades, because it is important for belarus because we are a union of states. i have heard many. uh, many paid attention to one more such moment, and i will ask her to show this video, and zelensky his facial expression when he met the bideno. well smiled, they hugged each other, but when the bilateral and extended meetings took place. look at his face. it is evil. and this

anger. he cannot hide, and many are now wondering what biden could say zelensky that the president of ukraine has become more gloomy to say or say, because i think deep down zelensky understands this little circus and the game in which he himself plays. and when he sees that in fact there is no experience, all these beautiful words are not for zelensky, zelensky is like steel , ukrainians are like steel. well, does he really not understand in the depths of his soul that they are used by aircraft. i was promised, uh, common words for all requests, as americans know how to communicate , a smile from ear to ear, of course. everything, let's see. tomorrow after tomorrow. and how will they do it? i i will look only at my own interests only at my own interests. and there will probably be many words, yes, the effect of the us president's visit turned out to be not the one that the kiev regimes were counting on. it was calculated then naturally. on the inner surface, it is more

to provide, additional financial military assistance, primarily the supply of fighter jets, perhaps the ukrainian regime, it’s no secret , is negotiating to drag in at least some way. uh, at least some kind of nuclear warhead, yes, in simple terms language. just some kind of tactical nuclear weapon. at least just place it in kiev . they think it will be insurance. i don't have such conversations, but what about these victorious reactions, what do they say? here baydin hugged zelensky well, you remember how he was hugging a korzai from afghanistan , and like, uh, three weeks before fleeing afghanistan , that means, uh, a telephone conversation took place with the president in the next drive of afghanistan. and biden. said what it means to support america and afghan democracy. she is unshakable in 3 weeks. the afghans were already hanging on the chassis to escape from this very afghan

democracy, so uh, so, uh, everything is strategically clear. they need a meat grinder here. here they need a regional war for the americans and they need us to be involved, that's not just the americans, and i'll just support it. you can continue. uh, the munich security conference is essentially a manifestation of the fact that no matter how we talk about the west, they are united in their anti-russia in this project of theirs, and risha sunok the shortage of weapons among european members the atlantic alliance should not cause panic. the depletion of europe's military arsenals is not a problem and the main argument. as he explains it, they were already intended against russia , well, hmm, and stoltenberg, the nato secretary general in the alliance, is not so afraid of a third world war as russia's victory in the conflict in ukraine, that is, we must be perfectly aware that we see what happened in munich it should be cut into quotes and within. here. uh, that active brisk information policy

that we need, as i said. gleb means show it on all channels, because this is not just some kind of score of russophobes. it's some kind of score. e man hateful hateful ideology, what they said there does not fit into the head of a normal person and europeans. that is. uh, if you remember the previous munich conferences, well, uh, sharp grin, they never bared it means that they put a lot on this war very simply before, excuse me, i can’t help but say that you know, we for decades they have been trying to change the government in russia and say so. and this belarus must become. we saw it all with our own eyes. well, it hasn't worked out yet. let's think about how they are now using the situation in ukraine and change the government. this is what all people should know. that is the price of democracy by choosing freedom. we say it, sometimes people don't understand, some listen to the macron, listen to the ball. and when lexus and vovan called him, and he said openly, this is a gray

area. it's not the people who live there. this is our territory, let's figure it out. that's right. you know what's alarming is that they've loosened their tongues like that confident in their victory, they went into a trick of the post. they are precisely because to speak like that to the whole world. uh, it means that they spit on diplomatic norms, that they use negotiations in order to deceive partners, that the arsenals were already intended for russia. that is, how can this be explained? this can be explained by the fact that their current operation. well, excuse me, i'll get in , again from my side, maybe not in time for their current operation to be quickly completed, because at the same conference in the fields, they met with the vans. and with him they behaved in a completely different way, because they know that their senior desks. nyor, right now he's scratching his turnips and thinking it's necessary. here's something quick. win,

because china will start next and china will start in full. china will begin on the entire inga pacific ocean. the region in parallel with this will begin the massacre for artificial intelligence conference. in the hague. these february 14 military use of artificial intelligence was proclaimed with the filing, the united states the same exercises in the arctic ocean for the first time in military fighter jets in e, on north of greenland is all that they already see, and they are still stuck in the old war, they are still stuck in a war where real resources are divided. and they will continue to fight for virtual, so they are ready today, yes, they are ready for a quick victory here, because they have no other option, if they do not win quickly here, then they lose completely sit down, there, uh here it was said that why is

zelensky so sad well, yes, sad and not satisfied, let's put it simply, yes. eh why? i will express my version, because that what he wanted to hear, of course, did not sound, but in my opinion, biden is also preparing for the twenty-fourth year for the elections. and what kind of luggage does she go with, and this is his trip to ukraine, what do we have? this is also evidence that he has nothing to show the americans in foreign policy that he has in his luggage. e about the munich conference. yes, there was a high-ranking representative of china, with whom contacts were supposed to take place before the conference, but then uh, because of this chinese probe, these contacts did not take place, then there is uh, the european establishment has no idea what will happen next and china uh, the intrigue is that there are no statements from him about what his vision

is for the continuation of this conflict, so uh, now i think that there will be the last breath of this of the collective west to pump up arms in order to win a quick victory, if it means negotiating with china, is this not china's vision of ivan them just on the fields in munich. conference - this is many times he was called now one of the most senior chinese diplomats. he says we are convinced about ukraine, we are convinced that this crisis situation can only be resolved through peaceful negotiations. this is the first time, the second time - this is a message, first of all, to ukrainians, some forces do not want peace in ukraine and their strategic goals extend beyond the borders of this country. that is, what we have already said today. ukraine is not the goal. yes, this is only an intermediate stage, yes there should be. the fact is that the collective west sees that it is two steps ahead europe is still calculating, but the americans are calculating much further and any wars.

no matter how long they continue, they still end in negotiations and peace, therefore, if in the near future, they will be activated. here are these attempts to seize the initiative to achieve great success, for which in order to have more advantageous conditions for negotiating. that's the maximum they can hope for. uh, it sounded from the west that it is impossible to defeat a nuclear power, therefore, about a comprehensive victory, this is possible for uh, our e oppositionists say that we will win in ukraine and take on belarus, but everyone who sensibly and objectively evaluates. they understand that there is no victory, because it will not be objective, there can be more advantageous conditions for the world in order to make peace and concentrate, including on countering china, because the us national security strategy china comes first, not russia and couldn't answer. normally, the question could, who asked him, but listen, and you can

supply weapons to ukraine a. why can't i substitute weapons for russia, what's wrong with that? what is the difference borol tried to explain that this is different, but i think that a normal explanation cannot be sounded. of course , here is another question so that we somehow put it together, here are different, but the opinions that were voiced today. in this program , when you really observe what is happening in ukraine, you try to understand how they came to a life so clear that there are many different factors, but at the same time you need to understand that there is an important internal factor. at some point, they played politics, pulled, pulled, tore the state and poured in or demons of various stripes. the nazis we see now are tanks that drive with crosses. these nazi greetings, and the assignment of the honorary title of edelweiss to one of the brigades and so on, the west does not see this. why because he already played this card in the 20th century, anaha, it works well and now we are building a civil society. we continue

to build laws on political parties on civil society, updated status. this is how we can build our civil society in such a way that after a while it does not turn into a rupture. where are these demons pouring in ukraine, the nazis are there, and we are somehow trying to replace them. the idea of ​​patriotism , let's pack into the idea of ​​patriotism something that has nothing to do with patriotism and some uncle across the ocean will tell us how and with whom to wage war. here is oleg sergeevich what we should focus on today is a very complex topic, but i will try to be very brief. the first is not to be confused democracy permissiveness and the absence of law and the absence of any rules in politics and in the construction of civil society. this is the first mistake of ukraine when everything should be democratic, everyone can be. so what if it's a fascist democracy? so what if this party opposes the constitution, they have the right to vote. this is

democracy and freedom. so what, they want to move to belarus to remove the russian language from the state to destroy the constitution, all we have done is democracy. this is the first mistake that you should never make, so that this does not happen here, and the second mistake. this is an external factor, let's say politics, ukraine collapsed first. the ussr allowed it, belarus i watched recently. you know, this should be shown on tv . when i sit down, i can name nothing terrible tikhonovskaya sits and communicates with the head of the soros foundation, and he complains, belarus is one of the first countries that kicked us out of here. so this is our happiness, thanks. lukashenka must be told to remove the external factor from politics forever, as soon as we launch these the funds of these diplomats who are sitting at the round table and we are counting down to them, as we held the elections or before you know, we will try democratically to meet your standards. and you hear us hear

us end. the whole collapse of the country is not to be confused with democracy with the law, and the second is to remove the external fact, and then we will not let this happen, the corresponding hmm mechanisms should be created, and they have already been created. that is the first stage. here is the formation. i have a new political in reality, it is over, that is, the law on political parties on civil society has been adopted ; all belarusian people's assemblies have completed the change in the electoral legislation. yes, the next stage is the next year, the reboot of such a political system, but in ukraine, uh, this situation. hmm, this situation did not come in one year there , uh, at least three decades, the entire political elite was decomposing, including, because the means of production are all in ukraine belonged to the oligarchs. our means of production belong to, e, belarusian people and naturally the oligarchs played their

puppet parties. this is what they led to, by the way, very interesting figures raised, exactly a year ago , when the government of ukraine was discussing the budget of the verkhovna rada, it gave a certificate explaining the number of people living in ukraine and there it was. the number was recorded with the government at 35 million. this imagine there were 51 million. according to correspondence in soviet times in the ninetieth or ninety-first, it became 35, what happened from these 35.5 is now officially in russia, five more in europe that is, -10 and 5 more are not taken into account anywhere, but also scattered around the world usa canada, latin america that is, now there are no more than 20 million people in ukraine, we are talking about why this is what the irresponsible politicians who were yes led to ,

perhaps more sympathetic of the youth. and they came in, so they lost this information war on images. uh, so, uh, the russian side, but in the end, look what happened as a result of a belligerent country with a catastrophically low level for such a territory. population and so, in order to prevent this, we launched this formation of a new political reality. and they will not allow these laws, rules and procedures, regulations. they will not allow such people as in ukraine to ever come to power. if the two key components yes are external internal policy factors and e, information control. yes, we allow, we can prevent politicians. all the more the same. uh, the fascists in germany came in a democratic way, so, and the first country that kicked out von soros on a grand scale was

just the same in the uk, if you remember yes, a little story, so hmm yes, it is possible to physically restrain at the level of the system of internal barriers some individuals or political parties from being present in politics. it can be done by the other side until we control the information space . to popularize our image and we will not invest real money in advertising the simplest things, and then more complex things. we can't keep the next and next and next generation from choosing bright blanks, overwhelmed by technology. buddy with foreign structures speaking different languages ​​and dressing nicely and they'll still have nice socks, yes, like rows. here we will not be able to, we will not be able to fix

the political reality forever in a situation where no external force is able to push through its man. if we are not able to control information information control, today the primary control of information based on the control of the emotional ee sector of the cultural ideological. yes, but cultural information about this here is a very substantive remarque literally for a minute, therefore, supplementing our system of checks of contradictions of balances of barriers. we must take the best from these quarterers, because everything they do is in the information space. it's just brilliant. it was better that these quarterrs had money and cloakrooms, whom he did not spare anything to take, ivanovich does not need what can become our amulet, what tasks do we have. here we talked about

tools specifically to strengthen our society. if possible, say so in general, but no external influence can be productive if there is internal unity , if people are confident in the future, if they have stability, stability both in the economy and in politics and in culture and in all other and family relations, including, therefore, we have spiritual moral values. speaking in a scientific language, speaking in a simple way, then you need to hear your people speak and always pursue a fair policy. what the president of our country has repeatedly said is the main conclusion. in my opinion, which we have made of the twentieth year. this is, well, the modernization of all aspects of our society, including the political system and those e, changes to the constitution that may have been adopted back and are now being implemented , and the entire belarusian people's assembly and the political party for the development and development of civil society are aimed at all this, including the information component

of the information safety. therefore, if we hear people react, then there will be no external influence. to what extent and who if, uh, if it weren’t tied up under it, it would all go into the sand. that is why we must hear our people and not only the authorities, which is located in the central organs. well, the district executive committees and village councils and collective farms and enterprises. yes thanks. thank you for your opinion, which was voiced in this program today. i thank our guests for sharing their thoughts on the events taking place. thank you to our viewers for today, see you in a week happily.