[000:00:00;00] the information received will be prepared by the instructions of the executive branch, which will be implemented in the future. the marathon of the world of childhood, the creation of kindness and mercy, announced the belarusian children's background in the year of its thirty-fifth anniversary from march 1 to the end of the year in all regions, the planned festive events for children will be purchased and donated medical rehabilitation equipment to help educational institutions of health care social protection, in addition , will send household appliances and things to the orphanages of the family. like as part of a marathon the action flowers of kindness will continue, apple seedlings will be purchased throughout the country and , together with the children, a symbolic children's apple orchard will be planted.

with their projects, but to live with warmth and care for our little citizens of the republic of belarus and the thirty-fifth anniversary is not a milestone. yes, this is a lot, but this is only a set of forces and opportunities for implementation of various programs and projects , the piggy bank of the belarusian team at the winter games of asian children has already replenished with five medals. this morning daniil bychkov climbed the podium for the second day in a row yesterday. behind the silver mixed relay. then for bronze in individual competitions at a distance of 500 m. a little later , our young men replenished the piggy bank with bronze in the relay at 3,000 m. and here bychkov, by the way, won his third award in the company of matvey mager roman zelenin and timofey thus, in the piggy bank of the belarusian team there were five medals, three of them in the short track. one in ski jumping and figure skating in total 57 sets are played at the competitions. medals in 10 sports will last the asian winter games

until march 5th. hello greetings to all who are with us now, we are very glad to see the guests of our today's program of this edition. well , biden then leaves in kiev, warsaw makes a statement, nothing new, by the way, but nevertheless, apparently, vladimir putin placed a common important message with a message the day before important accents, but of course, one way or another , we will touch on all this today, but this one transfer, even in 2 days , is enough to understand that today the topic of security is the number

one issue. and listen, mostly western countries, ukrainians talk a lot about this these days on the 22nd 23rd 24th 25th, something terrible will definitely happen. here is your forecast. this is another such hysteria in order to continue to pump up the heat and the fact that it is already overheating or true. here it is worth tuning in to something serious ivanovich we we see that ukraine has lost the initiative, and there are special military operations in a strategic military operation. therefore, it needs to invigorate its forces, its means to invigorate itself. here are the agreements that they allegedly reached on supplies. they have different weapons. uh, biden's visit to kiev is everything from this opera, therefore, in the near future, in my opinion, what should be expected is that the shelling will intensify. e donbass, e, the territory that is under the control of russian forces is the territory of russia, in my

opinion it will be that. e, taken, clear well. we have a well and the continuation of conflicts of some kind of changes objectively shows there can be no strength and no means. they have in order for radical changes. in the near future, in the coming days until spring, if it’s possible that your data is really something, the day after tomorrow it’s already exactly one year since the start of a special military operation, so when we assume that it could be worse, probably already nothing can be worse than war, because there is still and unfortunately, judging by the rhetoric that chose nuclear powers still have a couple of terrible options. well, taking into account the fact that hmm, the kiev regime consists of lakes. naturally, from my point of view, some kind of surprise was not in store. eh, the russian side, indeed. uh, as my colleague said? there will not be any progress, because

they are bogged down in positional wars to the side, but uh , some kind of hmm direct action, perhaps they will even carry out on the territory of russia. these forecasts are pure opinion, we live in an information war. and in times of thousands of fakes every day, so naturally. here these key dates are always used for information confrontation to pump up some date every month, something will happen, something will happen, second. of course, by this date there may be some provocations, some actions in order to again use them in the information space, which is the anniversary of what we did. this is the third, but at the same time, war is not a comic book for us, unfortunately, many people have such a date in their heads, everyone gathered, went in one day. something happened so there is no war. it's hard war is a long war. this death war is a tactic and no one e acts in one day and one hour. therefore, i do not expect something beyond global, but some provocations on

this day are quite possible, given that by twenty. on the twenty-fourth day, it is supposed to voice a certain plan, a, which ukraine calls peaceful , taking into account the fact that china, in its conflict with the united states a for global domination, is going to present its peace initiative and, very, clearly, is going to present it. these are big preconditions that something before it should be. well, plus everything. we should always be ready for anything, even in not very large operations, because not very large operations of stupid people in the information war can be inflated to any scandal due to exclusively information technologies, so the appearance of high-profile informational occasions these days is very very likely another question is what they will bear for uh, even a short-term perspective is not necessarily. this will be at least some

development, but informational loud. here may happen. this is the context in which we are discussing. e issues of national security. on monday, the president had a meeting with the security of the republic, belarus, and two very important areas were discussed and interesting, this is a draft of an updated concept of national security and such a new one for the belarusian rumor. people's militia. here, if you look at what caught on the most, what caused the greatest resonance. and here's what we noticed. this, of course, these are the words of the president that the belarusian mercifulness not a synonym for sacrifice, the message is immediately that every man should and not only a man should be able to handle weapons in order to protect at least his own family. and what caught my eye. many that in the key discussion of national security touched on the topic of values ​​and tradition.

that is, this is also in the district of discussing security topics, but that’s all, and our concept will be open, that is , anyone, including from abroad, will be able to get acquainted with it, but alexander ivanovich that the main thing you note in this new document about the updated here it was clearly stated that 70% of the concept was updated, but nevertheless its structure. it remains the same as the current one. she answers. the most important four critical questions in terms of security, what to protect against what to protect? where to protect and with what forces and means to protect this is all clearly their current concept, but in my opinion. uh, if we are talking about a project and a very important statement was made that this is a concept open these are fundamental questions. it will be submitted for public discussion in the near future. uh, it's that there's a new quality filling. we know that national security is a state

of protection of national interests from internal and external ones. but the project adds a very clear goal for the further progressive development of the belarusian society, that is, the goal is clearly traced further. uh, if we answer questions. what to protect against threats? e in the project e, concepts clearly defined types of image risks challenges and immediate threat. that is the stage of origin. this is the risk of the stage of formation and development - this is a challenge and a direct threat. this is what exists for e. society and protection is needed. speaking of spheres, a biological sphere is added there and i won’t specify for everyone, it’s clear how many epidemics we have experienced over the past decade

, an episode and, uh, various challenges and threats, including those that include laboratories around our country in the post-soviet space, but they talk about national interests. you, too, in your prelude to this issue, noted that it very clearly emphasizes the emergence of such concepts in strategic national interests as the ideology of the belarusian state, patriotic education, the people of belarus as an object of protection. and this is all connected precisely with the goal of ensuring national security. and in general. if we say that it is very important that our country, its originality lies in the fact that once we wanted to be a bridge between the east. and the west and this is a strategic goal and still we have now, but the current situation is today. it says that, unfortunately, in this situation it is necessary to be able to find e, forces and means in order to develop in our society in our

state. uh, i'll just finish a second and uh , specifically speaking of strategic national interests. we need to note that only if every member of the belarusian society deals with issues of ensuring national security, then our national security will be ensured. everything is right with everyone with a word of consent, but here people are watching us on tv, what they want, every belarusian wants to live peacefully to avoid war, so that there are no terrorist attacks in the country, so that no one sways the situation to live calmly and develop. by the way, the europeans want this document. this is what we are discussing now, this is the concept of national security of the law of the people's militia , the most important thing is that it comes first from life, and the real conditions in which our country lives now and the second, you can write a million documents. he's fine the most important thing is that now for all these years, especially the last year. we are doing everything for national security, that is, we are strengthening it, and why should we do this?

again, you want peace. always be ready for war, and the president spoke about this and met journalists halfway. and here is a clear parallel example. eh, with the great patriotic war, someone did not understand her. for example, i understood very well when the ussr was chattering for many years and they said that we would never enter the rise of the war , the president would say more such mistakes in belarus, for example, no one will ever repeat. we don't threaten anyone. actually. we have never laid claim to any territory. there was and is no aggression on our part, but to believe in fairy tales that you do not threaten us. we won't be anymore. we will discuss more. perhaps he is biden is russia threatened, who is our main threat to is there is the united states of america is there? ukraine that's who he is the number one threat to us, i would , most importantly, the threat - this is internal stability in the country, no one from the outside will ever win belarus. here is the most important thing it is to strengthen what we are doing internal unity of internal political

stability. now it has really strengthened, because forgive more than one enemy, we will never be destroyed. and yet, a colleague will say a lot about this and speaks and speaks correctly, look at the information pension alexey sergeevich. here we have poland , which is like a mandatory jock. here, uh, asteroids are driving communications, they are pumping up muscles. if it goes on like this, she'll drive herself to cardiac arrest. we have closes the borders. we have the united states of america which belarus for the first time introduced us into its concept of security. more ukraine. well things. that's what the poles are now pumping up weapons, what they do not do at the border, polish lilits do not think about one thing. if they drag the whole of europe into a war, they won't succeed. so poland, for example, got involved, belarus. if suddenly they would have succeeded sometime, that it would not work, and they and someone would serve time, then there would be no more. an hour later, no one understands from polish politicians and, for example, the lithuanian

president, who said, let's move on to red line. he does not understand that in 20 minutes there will be no lithuania. it's just this language trick who is the chief doctor for us, poland. uh, the polish people are not our enemy, but poland itself is an aggressive state that today threatens our national security. and we say this openly, we warn polish politicians about this, that we will never tolerate it. we see it, we watch it, and we have something to answer. why do they ask the question, because from year to year, until the twentieth year, we talked about that we are peace-loving, we are, and so it is, but with all this, if we deceive ourselves and do not clearly designate for ourselves as, for example, the same americans. they say we have russia we have china belarus they fit in hostile. that's who we should have in mind as enmity, yes, hostile means, but here we must also take into account that politics is a little more complicated. that is, we understand this general trend that we see we must

understand who if what, it is within these countries themselves was noticed. quite right. i will talk about the information component, when the issue was discussed, including on the people's militia. i had one question, and is done on the tradition of our ideas. the message, from which it is assumed that everyone will protect their home, and based on this, the overall national security will be strengthened accordingly. i have a question , taking into account the fact that in the global information space today there is a clear message from the west through culture through the media through and new media that individualization. i would even say atomization. a person within society is a positive process, bearing in mind that

saving oneself and everything will be fine. as a last resort, you can move to new zealand and when this is promoted very, very much for a lot of money. how much money will we spend on ensuring that our correct traditional other values ​​​​of protecting the home of our family of our hearth will be present in the information space. this is the main question, in my opinion, because we hope that that unchanging our traditional values. unfortunately, they are under direct attack under and they are just under threat. they are just trying to calculate this base, and returning to poland, polish politicians think very strongly what to do in the autumn elections, and taking into account the fact that they know very well that the current party, right and

justice in the autumn elections, will be opposed by non-russians . not in any way. it is not we who will plan in germany through e, tuska through e, the same swabians, and so on and so on, they need to present as much as possible, and a vivid image of the media. no matter what means, so today to grow up for the voters for the domestic market, because they can not boast of economic success. they can't brag. what effect does this have, that is, there are those in poland who strongly support this yes. look, closing the border. they denote an external enemy, an external enemy is always for internal use. moreover, on an external enemy. you can always find an inner enemy say you are against the fight against external enemies, which are expressed in the closure of borders. so

you are against us, you are an internal enemy. this is for internal use yesterday, if we return to putin's address, and he clearly divided, the western elite, yes, our enemy. biden personified, that is, even more clearly in his address, putin was looking for our enemy. giving too big vague definitions for the enemy today means not uniting this weak association. here, if everything is clear and personified. yes unfortunately today, with such simple things, you need to work with the audience, it comes faster. it's just that through information processes the effect is more than one. that's just the nuance the border was closed. they once arrived bytes. it is still in front of the outside public for america poland has named its national idea for the upcoming elections. he said more america in europe everyone

heard it. just think, poland will protect the united states in europe. this is completely. this means that the national interest and the border were closed , it is correct to speak about information questions. a byte arrived and shows more. we are ready to close the border for everything, to do anything. look at me. what kind of great poland, we will destroy everything in europe here. this is preparation for the elections - this is information technology, but on the other hand. unfortunately for me and all belarusians, this is the surrender of polish sovereignty and independence completely for today. this is the ruling polish elite, not independent at all. she is completely in her hands. listen to object big america in poland it means first of all in europe yes, it means less germany, it means less france and the uk is no longer in europe and not in the european union as a result of the british project to cut off germany and france, which correspond to their economic needs from russian

resources. it is exactly the same performed in poland , external markers and their internal interests have converged. at the same time, one and the same message works perfectly for an external audience, like a connection with america with a big strong friend, but it works the same way inside poland, as the most important thing, yes, the poles are the first. germans the main ones are not the germans, if we return to the concept of national security and the second issue that was discussed, they are closely related. this is the people's militia. why this is important for us is a fairly new phenomenon ivanovich, as you can see, security should be dealt with by everyone, therefore those who are in the unarmed forces are not in law enforcement agencies, nor in state bodies. uh, seniors are handicapped with skills that can u wield weapons and fight. that's what the people's militia, that is, uh, in every locality. uh, here was an opinion. so i read in the press

that it is in the villages and in the cities. it will be the same, especially the protection of public order, some public functions of the fulfillment of life, it will not stop there. yes , on approach. if uh, god forbid some kind of armed conflict will arise directly to the front line. everything will be clearly regulated there, there are military administrations and everything else. and somewhere in the rear. maintain public order , public functions, well, a sabotage reconnaissance counteraction group identifying them e, preventing the facts of looting. here we see even an earthquake. in turkey, there was a fact of looting at once, there are different people , therefore, these functions are in the first place, therefore it all acquires a national character, but it is necessary to lay the regulatory framework for the organizational conditions in order for this to work immediately. we sat and thought, how can we implement all this, how can we get it? whom and how to do it all,

yuriy elast declares a working mechanism and has always wildly oriented her neutral status and we always really, as the experts said, want to live in peace consent with our neighbors. and well, taking into account the fact that the ring around our perimeter is now shrinking , in fact, uh, all countries except russian ones. federations have become unfriendly from lithuania to ukraine, then the best guarantee of independence of sovereignty and such neutrality, of course, is the best guarantee is appropriate training. and here i recall the example of israel , which is also in a hostile environment, so there and uh, we took such measures, including including not only male, but also female representatives serving in the army, but, uh, our western partners simply do not leave us choices. we must follow this path

so that, as alex sergeevich rightly said , be ready when, after this chatter about reconciliation, they try to strike. and we will be ready for the second question. and why don’t we say one more thing, it’s important who said that there are no people in belarus who want to defend their country themselves, i travel around the country. i will tell you that there is a request. just we are sometimes guided on the internet by the opinion of some hipster who drinks beer in zybitskaya and this is considered. that's all the belarusian youth is not true, go to the outback and talk there. i'm not saying that everything in this direction is good, but willing people who want can defend their country and want to learn this and be in this people's militia. this is the second point, of course. every man should be able to defend his country. these are all countries. now they understand differently there will be no military security and the third moment of this soothes. by the way, i will tell you people far from the army, far from the special services.

when they don't know anything. and when you don’t know anything, that you are afraid, therefore the weight of the components is informational work, what my colleague says explain explain show say and the second moment when he delves into it even with the help of these collections with the help of these teachings that are carried out in the regions. when he comes out of there, he understands how it all really looks. and the myths are crumbling fakes and man already on another information work the other day we saw that there was a meeting of two presidents alexander lukashenko, vladimir putin, it is clear that they discussed issues. there mutual security joint security. it was based on the peace theme. look at the trade turnover of 50 billion, 80% of the implemented allied import substitution programs, as if specifically to show, look, we have a global agenda. it was very well seen from foreign journalists who talked with the president. they convey the mood of their own, and politicians and their regimes. eh, they have this one endlessly question this is the answer of the president. they are through

one re-request. well, when will belarus enter into e, war in e ukraine. why do they want it so much? why is this topic for them not to hear it. the answer is they still gave this informational story, yes. well, no matter what the belarusian president answers, anyway, i will ask exactly in fact , this is not the first time we see that people come here not to hear answers in order to ask a question in our space. after all. before him before them before everyone is now in front of all western media, i don’t like the word everyone by everyone, because this is a very big generalization, but in front of all western media whatever they are, even the american republican democratic ones there is the question of the information presence of control of someone else’s information space. today, through the institution of editors-in-chief, and these media, the idea of ​​​​confrontation is being promoted, what is good for americans

in confrontation not on their own territory, yes , to everyone field, yes, they all come here to convey tension to us. no, they come there in order to each bring nervousness with their question, because they are well aware that yes, they control a certain share of space, a very large one too large for an external factor in new media, but at the same time they know that they are less present in classical media . yes, they have such a way out, they meet with the first person, whom i trust here in order to express at least a brief interrogative manner their dishes flees from an uncomfortable question, turned around and went on autopilot. and let's listen. as the president answered, they are ready

to fight together with the russians from the territory of belarus, or that only in one so far it is better if at least one soldier with a gun comes to our territory from there to kill my people. this applies not only to ukraine. this also applies to our other neighbors, who behave even more inadequately, if they commit aggression against belarus , the answer will be the most severe. cruelest and the war would take on a completely different character. if the meeting of the president by journalists was really shown on all european tv channels on american ones, i now fantasize. i understand that this is a fantasy. but it would be the effect of an exploding bomb, because all this spoon, which probably poured on the ears of the europeans, is still spitting that belarus is some kind of aggressive state. it all collapsed, because look, the maidan

biden is coming. he talks so much about the war. if you wanted peace. so i said the same, he had 3 days ago, i was here a week ago. i said he would what he said, he came out and said from 4 pm today, as i am in kiev, not a single rocket will fly to the donbass. i am in minsk for 6 hours in the palace of independence with alexander racer. lukashenka putin flies there and we started, but in the world they showed alexandrovich , they showed an amazing piece in europe. now i will definitely ask you and i to look at it, then we will continue, of course, to discuss it there. the reason for communicating with the belarusian president gave foreign journalists the opportunity to go to the border with communicate with ukraine, including with the military, and here is one of the foreign journalists. he approached our military and asked and showed in his report. if you have to fight, you are amazingly ready there. just answer, let's

listen. sorry likes, i think that's how we will gnaw, but no, we heard em. well, and , accordingly, they fully confirmed their template, which, in fact, they are building wild hordes from the east since the time of tolkien, yes, which will come and gnaw. give money to the americans. they us we could cover up, we could show something else, but they showed exactly what, uh, why they went for us, no. no, why are they still closed for our perception? why will we gnaw for us, right? this is also an obviously sarcastic moment of the subtlety of the language, and for a simple english translation, let's eat it. come on you radicals connotation. why is this moment torn out without previous dialogue? after all, this is clearly

not the first question that has been asked. yes, the same journalist who is now half an interview with the president has 7 minutes left of his the first day, working in a structure that was at one time, but created in order not to write during the interview, because he already knew that he said that everything was written. and why the borders are being closed here sounded, but i added, because we conducted a visa-free regime and for poland, when tens of thousands of citizens come here, they see what is happening here, that the economy is developing peacefully, people’s eyes are burning because they work for himself and for his country. and they have normal peaceful prospects perspectives. and when they come, it's all 10 times more, because there are relatives , familiar friends, and they closed the border and that's it. the militarization of poland continues. eh why?

uh, here is very important. uh, a special military operation in ukraine because our fugitives are answering why do western journalists ask such a question, because they bet on the defeat of russia and then they will take on belarus ukraine is strategically important, and belarus is five times more important than, uh, ukraine here here is the answer why western journalists oleg sergeevich raised the topic several times already about the fact that the president invited biden and indeed many turned it into a joke right away. yes, the president is trolling biden, come here, but it seems to me that i just agree with alex sergeyevich , many were confused, because this is the shortest way to restore bloodshed, and on the ukrainian front, we are well aware that this is never interests of the united states of america never. and that's why they told the presentations about it. of course they won't go for it. but nonetheless. it wasn't trolling . and what is there, but hmm means to be ironic, if on our land in the same palace

of independence, e, the signing of the minsk agreements took place. i don't think the chancellor of germany or the president of france, uh, is less in status than the president of the united states, so of course president lukashenko proposed the most uh. hmm, the shortest way is the easiest. uh, that means, uh, a variant of resolving the issue , after all the councils are not governmental organizations, but the key, then, is in peace negotiations and lies precisely in that. is. yes, uh, that means, uh, invite the initiators of this conflict, the initiator of this conflict. these are the anglo-saxons, in particular the united states, because the kiev regime is controlled from the outside and we will not repeat this evidence for the hundredth time, it is too obvious,

respectively, president lukashenko as an experienced politician with, e, a brilliant instinct. he suggested the shortest way biden arrives putin arrives shake hands discuss draw something yes agree. in no case can this be viewed through the prism of irony, this is a real option. here, yes. and you will see when, sooner or later, this option will be implemented, because , probably, the superpowers will negotiate anyway. well, maybe it will be electricity . lukashenka heard in the united states of america the other day, who commented on this. donald trump said that putin is president? there would be no 24 hours of war. let's listen to what arguments he accompanied everything. people i'm literally on the same night as soon as i know my pobeda, i will call two people , you know who i won’t tell putin and zelensky. them. we need to meet. we'll meet, i guarantee i can work things out. i

know exactly what to say to them, i will tell this one to the other the second and i will tell you to better agree. we will conclude an agreement within 24 hours. but we propose an initiative, and trump plagiarizes it. this suggests that this initiative is absolutely sensible and pragmatic, and it can really ensure peace between the two countries, when european politicians begin to lie that there is no way to the world now is not. lukashenka understands everything perfectly, realizing the situation shows once again. it's all this way it's simple. you just don't want to go through it. that's all. that's the truth let's continue the conversation. so, finally, we are trying to understand, after all, for whom biden came, and in kiev, who needed this meeting more, by the way, biden with us in kiev, uh, were surprised. well, you're definitely not

surprised. no, i'm sorry yes, i guess i wasn't surprised, because biden had, but one chance to go to aga and uh, walk there on the polluted yes american polluted territories and at least try to explain something to trump's root electorate. as a matter of fact, vagae, yes, people who do not earn very much, and then they will also live in the contaminated territory and drink contaminated water could come. yes, as long as it's not in aha , that's the trick for him. it was the day of the presidents of the united states . well, this is the official name of the day of the presidents, he could spend it either with his electorate. and where he gets the maximum points. he did it his electorate looks at uh, foreign policy or could spend it with a stranger with the electorate

republicans. specifically, he lags at home and gets a hat. he estimated weighed and not the most that he decided decided his headquarters simply where he can get the best press the best and big press. he was able to get in kiev about what, in fact, and there was no need to look for two options. the only question was whether he would get the same good press from warsaw. yes, he would most likely get yesterday's. e last. well, the first comments, after his speech, said that yes, the people went in, because his speech was built on the simplest repetition already known without overworking. plus there were kids at the end. the children were chinese e do not return, typical ukrainians. and yes, we know it, we work in a system of signs. we need to get used to it. sorry bulky. we need to get used to the fact that we work

simultaneously in the real plane and in the system of signs. and if now for some politician the system of signs gives more points, he works with the system of signs. what does it mean for us? here, let's practically conclude that the system of signs symbolism absolutely supports. we will see that in general, western culture is involved in this. not only, by the way, western, yes, and what symbols should we then use to generate new ones or raise them from this is our choice. and this. we return to the first question, do we want to create a new symbol system? or should we really invest in promoting traditional values, as sad as it sounds, but the simplest thing. i, we are the mother of the world, that's what we wrote in cursive there in schools in kindergartens, the first words that we drew. now it's all does not work through words. it works through

images of emotions. yes, we need to come up with new advertising that would have an effect on the younger generation , when you started talking about the fact that the people's militia will rely on adults, even, well, even the old people yes, that's right, but when we talk about the example of israel, the example of israel begins where does the example of israel begin with that everyone knows that they will join the army at a young age of kindergarten quite rightly and when the first political magazine is calculated for a younger student. this is fine. yes, it is necessary to work with a younger audience and yes , through the language that they have, maybe it is not necessary to come up with a new value system. we need to invent a new language, the language of images, the language of emotions. which would now be perceived by a young youth audience , which would give the effect of trump when he speaks in short, clear words, he, when he speaks with politicians, he uses

longer words when he speaks in public space. it defines short words biden is trying, knowing that he is speaking badly , trying to keep silent at all. everything in the system of views of tension and so on. yes, no matter how ridiculous it sounds, but they work through emotions in order to connect , including young people, one moment, not for the first time, the united states of america relies on external factors in solving internal problems. so was the centennial visit. biden. this is another business visit. listen to me today ukraine and europe are the main source of income for the united states of america for this year. they've made millions of dollars and they want to make millions more. i came to watch investments, so that everything would spin and spin, launched ukraine to the last ukrainian. fight came to warsaw, prepare the poles to the last pole. close borders. come on, choke. we are

the money he will come to the white house and tell the representatives of the military-industrial complex. how many more contracts? how many millions? how much more land will they take? how many businesses is money. now i absolutely agree about the meanings, for example, looking i was more interested in the speech of the president of russia, not the military component, which caused everything. what's the point? what are the meanings? what new prices have become benchmarks for development within russia will be in the coming decades, because this is important for belarus because we are the union, i heard many. uh, many paid attention to one more such moment, and i will ask her sixes. show this video, and zelensky his facial expression when he met the bideno much score. they hugged each other, but when the bilateral and and expanded meeting. look at his face. it is evil. and this anger. he cannot hide, and many are now wondering what biden could say to zelensky that the president of ukraine has become

gloomier than a cloud? well, let’s say, here’s what not to say or say, because i thought in the depths of my soul zelensky understands this little circus and the game that he himself plays. and when he sees that in fact there is no experience, all these beautiful words are not for zelensky, zelensky is like steel , ukrainians are like steel. well, is he in the depths? souls do not understand that their use of aircraft. i was promised. uh, common words for all requests, as americans know how to communicate , smile from ear to ear, of course. everything, let's see. tomorrow after tomorrow. and how will they do it? i will look only at my own interests only at my own interests. and there will probably be many words, yes, the effect of the us president's visit turned out to be not the one that the kiev regimes were counting on, so that it was calculated then naturally. on the inner surface more to provide e, additional financial military assistance supply primarily fighters. maybe, uh, it's no secret that the ukrainian regime is negotiating to

drag him in in some uh way. uh, at least some kind of nuclear warhead, yes, in simple terms. just some kind of tactical nuclear weapon. at least just place it in kiev. they think it will be insurance. i don't have such conversations, but what about these victorious reactions, what do they say? here the baydyn hugged zelensky well, you remember how he was hugging korzai from afghanistan and like, uh, three weeks before the flight from afghanistan means, uh, a telephone conversation with the president in the next afghanistan drive. and biden. said what it means to support america and afghan democracy. she is unshakable, and in 3 weeks. the afghans were already hanging on the chassis to escape from this very afghan democracy, so uh, so, uh, everything is strategically clear. they need a meat grinder here. here they need

a regional war for the americans and they need us to be involved, that's not just the americans, and i'll just support it. you can continue. uh, munich conferences on security, this is essentially a manifestation of the fact that no matter how we talk about the west, they are united in their anti-russia in this project of theirs, and risha sunk , the shortage of weapons among the european members of the atlantic alliance should not cause panic, the depletion of europe's military arsenals is not a problem and main argument. as he explains it, they were already intended against russia, well, and uh, stoltenberg nato secretary general in the alliance is not so afraid of the third world war as russia's victory in the conflict in ukraine, that is, we must perfectly understand that we we see what happened in munich, it should be cut into quotes and within frames. here. uh, that active brisk information policy that we need, as i said. gleb means to show it on all channels, because this is not just some kind of russophobes score. it's some kind of score. eh, a person who hates

a hateful ideology, what they said there does not fit into the head of a normal person and europeans. that is. uh, if you remember, the previous munich conferences, well, uh, sharp grin, they never bared it means that they bet on this the war is very much very simple before, you excuse me, i can’t help but say that you know, for decades we have been trying to change the government in russia and say so. and it is belarus that needs to stand up. we saw it all with our own eyes. well, it hasn't worked out yet. let's think about how they are now using the situation in ukraine and change the government. this is what all people should know. that is the price of democracy by choosing freedom. we say it, sometimes people don't understand, some listen to the macron, listen to the ball. and when lexus and vovan called him, and he openly said that it was a gray zone. it's not the people who live there. this is our territory, let's figure it out. here's the truth. you know that it is alarming that they have loosened their tongues in such a way, this suggests that they are still

confident in their victory, precisely because they have to speak like that to the whole world. uh, it means that they spit on diplomatic norms, that they use negotiations in order to deceive partners, that the arsenals were already intended for russia. that is, how can this be explained? this can be explained by the fact that their current operation. well, i'm sorry, i'll get in, again, for their part, maybe not in time for their current operation to be quickly completed, because at the same conference in the fields, they met with the vans. and with him they behaved in a completely different way, because they know that their senior desks. nyor, right now he's scratching his turnips and thinking it's necessary. here's something quick. win, because china will start next and china will start in full. china will start on

the whole indian. the pacific region will also start the massacre for artificial intelligence conference. in the hague. these 14 february, the military use of artificial intelligence was proclaimed with the filing of the united states the same exercises in the arctic ocean for the first time in military fighters in e, in the north of greenland this is all that they already see, and they are still stuck in the old war, they are still stuck in the war, where real resources are shared. and they will continue to fight for virtual, so they are ready today, yes, they are ready for a quick victory here, because they have no other option, if they do not win quickly here, then they lose completely sit down, there, uh here it was said that why is zelensky so sad well, yes, sad and not satisfied, let's put it simply, yes. eh why? i will express my version,

because what he wanted to hear, of course, did not sound, but in my opinion, biden is also preparing for the twenty-fourth year for the elections. and what kind of luggage does she go with, and this is his trip to ukraine, what do we have? this is also evidence that he has nothing to show the americans in foreign policy that he has in his luggage. e about the munich conference. yes there was a representative high-ranking china, with whom contacts were supposed to take place before the conference, but then, uh, because of this chinese probe, these contacts did not take place, that is, uh, the european european establishment has no idea what will happen next and china uh, the intrigue lies in that there are no statements about what his vision is for the continuation of this conflict, so uh, now i think that there will be the last breath of this collective west on pumping

arms in order to win a quick victory, if it means they will negotiate with china isn't this a vision. china to you just on the sidelines of the münker conference - this is many times he was now called one of the most senior chinese diplomats. he says we are convinced about ukraine, we are convinced that this crisis situation can only be resolved through peaceful negotiations. this is the first time, the second time - this is a message, first of all, to ukrainians, probably, some forces do not want peace in ukraine and their strategic goals extend beyond the borders of this country. that is, what we are talking about everyone has already said today that ukraine is not the goal. yes, this is just an intermediate step. yes , the fact is that the collective west sees that europe still calculates two moves ahead, but the americans calculate much further and any wars. no matter how long they continue, they still end in negotiations and peace, therefore, if in the near future, they will be activated. here are these attempts to seize

the initiative to achieve great success, for which in order to have more advantageous conditions for negotiating. here is the maximum they count. uh, the side of the west sounded that it is impossible to defeat a nuclear power , therefore, about a comprehensive victory, it is possible for uh, our oppositionists to say that we will win in ukraine and take on belarus, but everyone who sensibly and objectively evaluates. they understand that there is no victory , because there will be no more objective conditions for peace in order to make peace and concentrate, including on countering china, because the us national security strategy china stands in the first place, not russia and could not answer. normally, they could answer the question, who asked him, but listen, you can supply weapons to ukraine a. why can't i substitute weapons for russia, what's wrong with that? what is the difference boral tried to explain that this is different, but i think that a normal

explanation cannot be sounded. of course , here is another question so that we somehow put it together, here are different, but the opinions that were voiced today. in this program, when you really observe what what is happening in ukraine is trying to understand how they came to a life so clear that there are many different factors, but at the same time you need to understand that there is an important internal factor. at some point, they played politics, pulled, pulled, tore the state and poured in or demons in various stripes. nazis. we now see tanks that drive with crosses. well, that is, nazi greetings, and the assignment of the honorary title of edelweiss to one of the brigades and so on, the west does not see this. why because he already played this card in the 20th century, it is not bad comes and now we are now engaged in the construction of civil society. we continue to build laws on political parties on civil society, updated status. this is how we can build our civil society in such a way that after

a while it does not turn into a rupture. where, in ukraine, these demons will pour in, there are nazis, and we are somehow trying to replace them. the idea of ​​patriotism, let's pack into the idea of ​​patriotism something that has nothing to do with patriotism and some uncle across the ocean will tell us how to deal with us and with whom war. here is oleg sergeevich what we should focus on today is a very complex topic, but i will try to be very brief. the first is not to confuse democracy with permissiveness and the absence of law and the absence of any rules in politics and in building a civil society. this is the first mistake of ukraine when everything should be democratic, everyone can be. so what if it's a fascist democracy? so what if this party opposes the constitution, they have the right to vote. this is democracy and freedom. so what, they want to move to belarus to remove the russian language from states to destroy the constitution all we have done is democracy. this is the first

mistake that should never be made so that this does not happen, and the second mistake. this is an external factor, let's say politics, ukraine collapsed first. the ussr allowed it, belarus i watched recently. you know, this should be shown on tv . when i sit down, i can name nothing terrible tikhonovskaya sits and communicates with the head of the soros foundation, and he complains, belarus is one of the first countries that kicked us out of here. so it our happiness is thanks. lukashenka must be told that the external factor should be removed from politics forever, as soon as we launch these funds of these diplomats who are sitting at the round table, and we count them down, how we held the elections or before, you know, we will try democratically to meet your standards. and you hear us hear us end. all the collapse from the side of two points is not to be confused with democracy with the law, and the second is to remove the external fact, and then

we will not allow this, it just needs to be created, appropriate hmm mechanisms, and they are already created. that is, the first stage is this formation. it is over with a new political reality, that is, the law on political parties on civil society has been adopted ; all belarusian people's assemblies have completed the change in the electoral legislation. yes, the next stage is the next year, a reboot of such a political system. but in ukraine , uh, this situation . including, because the means of production in ukraine all belonged to the oligarchs. in our country , the means of production belong, er, to the belarusian people, and naturally the oligarchs played with their puppet parties. this is what they led to, by the way, very interesting figures raised, exactly a year ago

, when the government of ukraine was discussing the budget of the verkhovna rada, it gave a certificate explaining the number of people living in ukraine and there it was. the number was recorded with the government at 35 million. this imagine there were 51 million in the census in soviet times in ninety or ninety-one and it became 35, what happened to these 35.5 is now officially in russia five more in europe , that is, -10 and 5 more are not taken into account anywhere, but they also fled all over the world usa canada e, latin america that is, now there are no more than 20 million people in ukraine , we are talking about why. this is what irresponsible politicians led, who were, yes, perhaps more attractive to young people. and they entered, therefore, they lost this information war on images. uh, so, uh russian side,

but in the end look what happened in the end a belligerent country with catastrophically low for such a territory. the population and so, in order to prevent this, we launched this formation of a new political reality. and they will not allow these laws, rules and procedures, regulations. they will not allow such people as in ukraine to ever come to power. if the two key components yes are external and internal policy factors and e, information control. yes, we allow, we can prevent politicians. all the more the same. uh, the fascists in germany came in a democratic way, here, and the first country, which kicked out von soros in a big way was just the same great britain if you remember a little story so, uh, yes, you can physically restrain at the level of the system

of internal barriers of some individuals or political parties from being in politics. it can be done from the other side until we control the information space . to popularize our images, we will not invest real money in advertising the simplest things, and then more complex things. we can't keep the next the next next generation from not choosing bright empty swung by technology. buddy with foreign structures, speaking different languages ​​and dressing nicely and they will also have nice socks, yes, as a row. here we will not be able to, we will not be able to fix the political reality forever in a situation where no external force is able to stretch out

its man. if we can't control information control of information, today the primary control of information based on control emotional e-e cultural ideological sector. yes, but the cultural informational one here is a very substantive arch literally for a minute, therefore, supplementing our system of checks and balances of barriers. we must take the best from these neighborhoods, because everything they do is in the information space. it's just brilliant. it was better that these quartermen had money and a kommoiska, with which he did not spare anything, there was no need for ivanovich to become our talisman, what tasks did we have. here we talked about tools specifically to strengthen our society. if i may say so in general, but no external influence can be productive

if there is internal unity, if people are confident in the future, if they have stability, stability in the economy, in politics, in culture, and in all the rest and family relationships, including, therefore, we have spiritual moral values. speaking in a scientific language, speaking in a simple way, then you need to hear your people speak and always conduct a fair politics. what the president of our country has repeatedly said, the main conclusion. in my opinion, which we have made of the twentieth year. this is, well, the modernization of all aspects of our society, including the political system and those e, changes to the constitution that may have been adopted back and are now being implemented, and the entire belarusian people's assembly and the political party for the development and development of civil society are aimed at all this, including the information component information security. therefore, if we are people hear react, then no outside influence. to what extent and whoever, uh,

would not tie up under it, it will all go into the sand. that is why we must hear our people and not only the authorities, which is located in the central organs. well, the district executive committees and village councils and collective farms and enterprises. yes thanks. thank you for your opinion, which was voiced in this program today. i thank our guests for sharing their thoughts on the events taking place. thanks to our viewers for today, see you in a week

happily. this is a panorama of the live broadcast of the main events of tuesday, february 28, i will tell you sergey lugovsky hello, a visit in the highest form and a real negotiating marathon belarusian, aircraft number one arrived in china, the world media held their breath. so who is fighting in ukraine poland breaks records in military spending and signs a new contract for armament. but ordinary poles are categorically against