[000:00:00;00] 544 applications is it only belarusians or can you recognize belarus through the eyes of foreign tourists absolutely true, because in the past years, in general , foreigners took part in our country, filmed beautiful video stories and photographs and received their awards and even came to the award ceremony, because the ceremony awards. and we always say that this is a kind of oscar in the field of tourism - it is always solemnly beautiful in your memory. what are the brightest works? here's for you to highlight. here is an example set. well, it's very difficult here. because each nomination deserves respect and i have already said very much today that there is an interesting children's work. uh, for example nominations. i get to know belarus when children in some uniform style or in traditional clothes take photos at the objects. and here the guide deserves attention for years, because the one who wins is really a professional with a capital letter, he

knows he can capture the attention of tourists. uh, well, just excellent, so u need to say that u capture and the nominations that we have every year or on the contrary, it changes, because, for example, there was a year of historical memory, nominations and winners deserve attention here. eh, who exactly worked in this direction? well, this year we have two new nominations for religious tourism. and here, too, the division will be just the same, uh, in honor of the year of peace and creation. well, the event tourism nominations, because in our republic today there are a lot of event events that deserve

attention. hello, i welcome everyone who is now very happy to see the guests of our of today's program of this edition. well , biden in kiev then goes to warsaw and makes a statement, by the way, nothing new, but nonetheless. apparently a very important message.

vladimir putin, in his message the day before, placed important accents, but of course, one way or another , we will touch on all this today, but this one transfer, even in 2 days , is enough to understand that today the topic of security. this is question number one. and listen, in the main western countries, ukrainians talk a lot about this in these days are 22 23 24 25, something terrible will definitely happen. here is your prediction. this is another such hysteria in order to continue to pump up the heat and what is already overheated or true. here it is worth tuning in to something serious center ivanovich we see that ukraine has lost the initiative, uh, in a strategic military operation there are special military operations. therefore, it needs to invigorate its forces, its means to invigorate itself. here are the agreements that they allegedly reached on supplies. they have different weapons. uh, visit

biden to kiev is all from this opera, therefore , in the near future, in my opinion, what should be expected is that the shelling will intensify. e donbass , e, the territory that is under the control of russian forces is the territory of russia, in my opinion it will be that. eh, having taken a clear course towards the escalation and continuation of conflicts of some changes, while there can be no objective way, there can be no forces and no means they have in order for radical changes. in the near future, here in the coming days until spring, if you can, what is your data really the day after tomorrow it is already exactly a year since the special military operation began, so when we assume that it could be worse, probably nothing can be worse than a war, because there is still and unfortunately, judging by the rhetoric that chose nuclear powers still have a couple of terrible options left. well, taking into account the fact that hmm, the kiev

regime consists of poseurs. naturally, from my point of view, some kind of surprise was not in store. eh, the russian side, indeed. uh, as i said, my colleague will not make any progress, because in the side got bogged down in a positional war, but some kind of direct action, perhaps even on the territory of russia they will not be pronounced. now the forecasts are clear. we are living in an information war. and in times of thousands of fakes every day, so naturally. these key dates are always used for information confrontation to pump up some date every month, something will happen, the second. of course, by this date there may be some kind of provocation actions in order to again use them in the information space, which is the anniversary of what we have done. this is the third, but at the same time, war is not a comic book for us, unfortunately, many people have such a date in their heads, everyone gathered, went

in one day. something happened so there is no war. it's a hard war - it's a long war. this death war is a tactic and no one e acts in one day and one hour. therefore, i do not expect something beyond global, but some kind of provocation on this day is quite possible, and with taking into account the fact that by the third twenty-fourth it is supposed to voice a certain plan, a, which ukraine calls peaceful, taking into account the fact that china, a-a, in its conflict with the united states a for global domination , is going to present its peace initiative and, very, clearly, is going to present it . these are big prerequisites for the fact that something before this should be. well, plus everything. we must always be ready for anything, even in not very large operations, because a not very large operation is stupid in the information wars can be inflated to any scandal due to information technologies alone,

so the appearance of high-profile informational occasions these days is very, very likely another question, what they will carry for, uh, even a short-term perspective is not necessary. this will be at least some development, but informational loud. here it can happen. it is under such conditions that we discuss, a matters of national security. on monday, the president had a meeting, and from this security of the republic of belarus, there are two very important directions discussed. this is an interesting project, an updated concept of national security and such a new people's militia for the belarusian rumor. here, if you look at what caught on the most, what caused the greatest resonance. and here's what we noticed. this, of course, these are the words of the president that belarusian peacefulness is not a synonym for sacrifice, immediately the message is that every man should and not only a man

should be able to handle weapons in order to protect at least his own family. and what caught the eye of many is that, in the vein of discussions of national security , they touched on the topic of values ​​and traditions. that is , it is also around the discussion, the topics of security. well, at the same time, everything, and our concept, it will be open. that is, anyone, including those from abroad, will be able to get acquainted with her. but alexander ivanovich, the main thing you note in this new updated document here was clearly stated that 70%, uh , the concept, uh, it has been updated, but nevertheless its structure. she remained the same as acting she answers. most importantly , the four most important questions in terms of security, what to protect against what to protect? where to protect and with what forces and means to protect this is all clearly their current concept, but in my opinion. eh,

if we are talking about a project and a very important statement was made that this concept is open, these are fundamental questions. it will be submitted for public discussion in the near future. uh, it's that there's a new quality filling we know that the national security state protection of national interests from internal and external threats, but the project adds a very clear goal for the further progressive development of the belarusian society, that is, the goal is clearly traced further. e. if we answer questions, uh, from what to protect against threats? e, in the draft concept, there are clearly defined types of risks, challenges and direct threats, that is, the stages of inception. this is the risk of the stage of formation and development - this is a challenge and a direct threat. this is what exists for e.

society and protection is needed. e speaking of spheres, a biological sphere is added there and i won’t specify for everyone, it’s clear how many epidemics we have experienced over the past decade , episode and uh, various challenges and threats, including those that include laboratories around our country in the post-soviet space, but they talk about national interests. you, too, in your prelude to this issue, noted that it very clearly emphasizes the fact that such concepts appear in strategic national interests as the ideology of the belarusian state patriotic education, the people of belarus as an object of protection. and this is all connected precisely with the goal of ensuring national security. and in general. if we say that it is very important that our country, its originality lies in the fact that once we wanted to be a bridge between the east. and the west, and this is a strategic goal and

we still have it, but the current situation is today. she says that, unfortunately, in this situation, one must be able to find e, forces and means in order to develop in our society in our the state. uh, i'll just finish a second and uh , specifically speaking of strategic national interests. we need to note that only if every member of the belarusian society deals with issues of ensuring national security, then our national security will be ensured. everything is correctly said with every word consent but people are watching us on tv, what do they want every belarusian wants to live peacefully to avoid war, so that there are no terrorist attacks in the country, so that no one sways the situation to live in peace develop. by the way, the europeans want this document. the one we're discussing right now is the concept of emotional security. the law on the people's militia is the most important thing, that it comes first from life, and the real conditions in which our country

lives now and the second, you can write a million documents. he's fine the most important thing now for all these years, especially last year. we are doing everything for national security, that is, we are strengthening it, and why should we do this? again you want peace always be ready for war, and the president spoke about this at a meeting with journalists. and here is a clear parallel example. eh, with the great patriotic war, someone did not understand her. for example, i understood very well when the ussr was chattering for many years and they said, we will never attack you , there will be no war, the president said more such mistakes in belarus, for example, no one will ever repeat. we don't threaten anyone. actually. we have never claimed any territories of aggression on our part, there was not and is not, but to believe in fairy tales that you do not give us threaten. we will be no more. we will discuss, probably, if russia is not threatened, who is our main threat anymore. is there is the united states of america is there?

ukraine that's who he is the number one threat to us, i would, most importantly, the threat - this is internal stability in the country, no one from the outside will ever win belarus. that's the most important thing - this is the strengthening, which we are doing, of the internal unity of internal political stability. now it has really strengthened, because forgive more than one enemy, we will never be destroyed. and nevertheless, a colleague will say a lot about this and says , and correctly, he says, information security, look. here we have poland , which is like such a mandatory jock. here, uh, asteroids are driving communications, they are pumping up muscles. if it goes on like this, she'll drive herself to cardiac arrest. we have closes the borders. we have the united states of america , which belarus for the first time introduced more necessary thing into its concept of ukraine's security. that's what the poles are now pumping up weapons what they do not do, border polish lilits, do not think about one thing.

if they drag the whole of europe into a war, they won't succeed. so poland, for example, got involved, belarus. if suddenly they would have succeeded sometime, that it would not work, and they and someone would serve time, then there would be no more. an hour later, no one understands from the polish politicians and, for example, the lithuanian president, who said, let's go to the red line. he does not understand that in 20 minutes there will be no lithuania. it's just this language trick who is the chief doctor for us, poland. uh, the polish people are not our enemy, but poland itself an aggressive state, which today threatens our national security. and we say this openly, we warn polish politicians about this, that we will never tolerate it. we see it, we watch it, and we have something to answer. why do they ask this question, because we have been saying from year to year until the twentieth year that we are peace-loving, we are, and so it is, but with all this, if we deceive ourselves and do not clearly designate for ourselves as, like the americans, for example. they say we have russia, we have china

belarus they fit into the soviet regimes, hostile. here is a column that should be borne in mind as hostility, yes, hostile means, but here we must also take into account that politics is a little more complicated. that is, we understand this general tendency that we see earlier to attack, but we must understand who, if anything, within these countries themselves . quite right. i will talk about the information component, when the issue was discussed , including on the people's militia. i got one question, and is done on the tradition of our ideas the message, from which it is assumed that everyone will protect their home, and based on this, the overall national security will be strengthened accordingly. i have a question, taking into account the fact that in the global information space today there is

a clear message from the west through culture through the media through and new media that individualization. i would even say atomization. a person within society is a positive process, taking into account the fact that saving oneself and everything will be fine. last resort you can move to new zealand and when this is promoted very, very much for a lot of money. how much money will we spend on ensuring that our correct traditional other values ​​​​of protecting the home of our family of our hearth will be present in the information space. this is the main question, in my opinion, because we hope that our traditional values ​​\u200b\u200bare unchanged. unfortunately, they are under direct attack under and they are just under threat. they

are just trying to shake this base, a going back to poland polish politicians think very hard what to do in the autumn elections, and taking into account the fact that they know very well that the current party of law and justice in the autumn elections will be opposed by non-russians. not in any way. it is not we who will implant germany through e, tuska through e, the same swabians, and so on and so on, they need to be presented as much as possible, but a vivid media image. it doesn't matter by what means, so today to grow up for the voters for the domestic market, because they cannot brag about economic success. they can't brag. what effect does this have, that is, there are those in poland who support this in every possible way. yes, look, closing the border. they denote an external enemy,

an external enemy is always for internal use. moreover, on an external enemy. you can always find an internal enemy and say you are against the fight against external enemies, which are expressed in the closure of borders. so you are against us, you are an internal enemy. this is for internal use yesterday if to return to putin's appeal, but he somehow divided the western elites. yes, our enemy persinified biden, that is, putin was looking for our enemy even more clearly in his appeal. giving too big vague definitions for the enemy today means not uniting this weak association. here, if everything is clear and personified. yes, unfortunately today with such simple things, you need to work with the audience, it comes faster. it's just that through the information process the effect is more than

one. that's just the nuance the border was closed. they, as soon as arrived. it's still in front of the public for america in poland called its national idea for the next elections. he said more america in europe everyone heard it. just think, poland will protect the united states in europe. this is completely. this means that the national interest and the border were closed , it is correct to talk about information issues. a byte arrived and shows more. we are ready to close the border for everything, to do anything. look at me. what kind of great poland, we will all be here in europe again. this is preparation for the elections - these are informational technology, on the other hand. unfortunately for me and all belarusians, this is the surrender of polish sovereignty and independence completely for today. this is the ruling polish elite, not independent at all. she is completely in her hands.

listen to the objectors big america in poland it means first of all in europe yes it means less germany it means less france and the uk is no longer in europe yes not in the european union as a result of the british project to cut off germany and france that correspond to their economic needs from russian resources. it is exactly the same performed in poland, external markers and their internal interests have converged. at the same time, one and the same message works perfectly for an external audience, like a connection with america with a big strong friend, but it works the same way inside poland, as the most important thing, yes, the poles are the first. germans in chief are not germans, if you go back to the concept of national security and the second issue that was discussed they are closely related. this is the people's militia. why is this important for us , a fairly new phenomenon with ivanovich as as you can see, everyone should deal with security, so those who are in the unarmed forces are not in law enforcement agencies, nor in states.

uh, seniors are handicapped with skills that can u wield weapons and fight. that's what the people's militia, that is, uh, in every locality. eh, there was an opinion here. so i read in the press that it is in the villages and in the cities. it will be the same, especially the protection of public order, some public functions of the fulfillment of life, it will not stop there. yes, on approach. if uh, god forbid some kind of armed conflict will arise directly to the front line. everything will be clearly regulated there, there are military administrations and everything else. and somewhere in the rear. to maintain public order , public functions, well, a sabotage reconnaissance group to counter and identify them, to prevent the facts of looting. here we see even an earthquake. uh, in turkey there was a fact of looting, there are different people at once, therefore , these functions are in the first place, therefore it all acquires a national character, but this it is necessary to lay down the regulatory framework

and organizational conditions in order for this to work immediately. we sat and thought, how can we implement all this, how can we get it? whom and how to do all this , yuri belarus declares a working mechanism and has always diplomatically oriented its neutral status to mi. we always really, as experts said, want to live in peace consent with our neighbors. and well, taking into account the fact that the ring around our perimeter is now shrinking , in fact, uh, all countries except russian ones. the operation became unfriendly from lithuania to ukraine is the best guarantee of the independence of sovereignty and such neutrality, of course, the best guarantee is the appropriate preparation. and here i recall the example of israel, which is also in a hostile

environment, so there and uh, they took such measures, including the military service of not only males, but also females, but our western partners. they just don't leave us a choice. we must follow this path so that, as oleg sergeevich correctly said, be ready when, after this chatter about reconciliation, they try strike. and we will be ready for the second question. and why don’t we say one more thing , it’s important who said that there are no people in belarus who want to defend their country themselves, i travel around the country. i will tell you that there is a request. it's just that we sometimes rely on the internet for the opinion of some hipster who drinks beer in zybitskaya and it counts. that's all the belarusian youth is not true, go to the outback and talk there. i'm not saying that everything in this direction is good, but willing people who want can defend their country and want to learn this and be in this people's

militia. this is the second point, of course. every man should be able to defend his country. these are all countries. now they understand differently there will be no military security, and the third moment of this is reassuring. by the way, i will tell you people far from the army, far from the special services. when they don't know anything. and when you don’t know anything, what are you afraid of, that’s why the two components of the informational work, that my colleague says to explain to explain to show, speak and the second moment when he delves into it even with the help of these collections with the help of the teachings of these, which are carried out to the regions. when he comes out of there, he understands how it all really looks. and myths are collapsing fakes and a person has a different emotional work. the other day we saw that there was a meeting of two presidents alexander lukashenko, vladimir putin, it is clear that they discussed issues. there mutual security joint security. on the basis of something was peaceful theme. look at the trade turnover under 50 billion, 80% completed union import substitution program, as if

on purpose to show. look, we have a global agenda. well , it was very well seen from the foreign journalists who spoke with the president. they convey the mood by their politicians and their regimes. eh, they have this question endlessly. here is the president's answer. they ask the question again after one. well, when will belarus enter into e, war in e ukraine. why do they want it so much? why is this topic for them not to hear it. the answer is they don't care and pedal this information history, yes. well, no matter what the belarusian president answers, anyway, i will ask exactly in fact , this is not the first time we see that people come here not to hear answers in order to ask a question in our space. after all. in front of him in front of them in front of everyone now in front of all western media here, i don’t like the word everyone by everyone, because this is a very big generalization, but in front of all western media whatever they are, there are even american republican democratic

there is a question of the information presence of control of someone else's information space. today, through the institute of editors-in-chief, and these media, the idea of ​​confrontation is being promoted, what is good for the americans in confrontation not on their own territory, yes to everyone what is good about the constant presence of the topic of war outside their own field in a foreign information field, yes, they all come here to convey tension to us no, in order for everyone to bring nervousness with their question, because they are well aware that yes, they control a certain proportion of space, very large too large for the external factor in the new media, but at the same time they know that they are less present in the classic media. yes, they have such a way out, they meet with the first

person, to whom i trust here in order to express at least a brief begging manner, they run away from an uncomfortable question, turned around and went on autopilot. and let's listen. as the president answered, they are ready to fight together with the russians from the territory of belarus, or that only in one bye listen, if at least one is from there soldiers with a gun will come to our territory to kill my people. this applies not only to ukraine. this also applies to our other neighbors, who behave even more inadequately, if they commit aggression against belarus , the answer will be the most severe. the most severe and the war will take on a completely different character. if the meeting of the president by journalists was really shown on all european television channels on american ones, i now fantasize. i understand that this is a fantasy. but

it would be the effect of an exploding bomb, because all this spoon that was poured on the ears europeans still spits that belarus is some kind of aggressive state. it all collapsed, because look, the maidan biden is coming. he talks so much about the war. if you wanted peace. so i said, not here 3 days ago, i was here a week ago. i said, he would have said what he came out and said from 4 pm today, as i am in kiev, not a single rocket will fly to the donbass. i am in minsk for 6 hours in the palace of independence with alexander racer. lukashenko putin flies there and we started again in the world, and did not show aleksandrovich alone showed an amazing fragment in europe. now i will definitely ask you and i to look at it, then we will continue to discuss it , of course . he approached

our military and asked and showed in his report. if you have to fight, you are amazingly ready there, just let's hear the answer. sorry likes. i think like this here we will gnaw, but no, we heard em. well, and , accordingly, they fully confirmed their template, which, in fact, they are building wild hordes from the east since the time of tolkien, yes, which will come and gnaw. give money to the americans. they will cover us, we could show and we could show something else, but they showed exactly that one, uh, in fact, why did they go for us, no, why? are they still closed to our perception? why will we gnaw for us, right? this,

among other things, is obviously a sarcastic moment of the subtlety of the language, and for simple english translation let's eat let's eat. yes, all radical connotations. why is this moment torn out without previous dialogue? after all, this is clearly not the first question that has been asked. yes, the same journalist who is doing an interview with the president now has 7 minutes left of his not the first day, working in a structure that was at one time, but created in order not to take notes during the interview, because he already knew that he said everything was written. and why are the borders closing? it sounded here, but i will add, because we were visa-free regime for poland too, when tens of thousands of citizens come here, they see what is happening here, that the economy is developing peacefully, people's eyes are burning, because they work for themselves and for their country. and they have prospects for normal peaceful

prospects. and when they come, it's all 10 times more, because there are relatives , familiar friends, but they closed the border and the militarization of poland continues. eh why? u here, uh, very important. uh, a special military operation in ukraine, because our fugitives answer why do western journalists ask such a question, because they made a bet on the defeat of russia and then they will take on belarus ukraine is strategically important, and belarus is five times more important than ukraine here is the answer why western journalists ask such questions, see oleg sergeevich nevertheless, he touched on the topic several times already about the fact that the president invited biden and, indeed , many immediately turned into a joke that the president is trolling biden. come here, but it seems to me that i just agree with alex many people are confused by sergeevich, because this is the shortest way to stop the bloodshed, and on the ukrainian front we are well aware that this is never in the interests of

the united states of america, not even once. and that's why they told the presentations about it. of course they won't, but still. it wasn't, it wasn't trolling. and what does it mean to be ironic, if on our land in the same palace of independence, e, the signing of the minsk agreements took place? i don't think the chancellor of germany or the president of france uh, less status than the president of the united states so, of course, president lukashenko proposed the most e. hmm, the shortest way is the easiest. e, means, e option of the decision of questions. after all, it would seem such a complex conglomeration of how to figure out how it means that expert groups work , some councils are not government organizations, but the key is e, which means that in peace negotiations in and lies precisely in that. is. yes, uh, that means, uh, invite

the initiators of this conflict, the initiator of this conflict. these are the anglo-saxons in particular the usa because the kiev regime is controlled from the outside and we will not repeat this evidence for the hundredth time, it is too obvious, respectively, president lukashenko as an experienced politician with, uh, a brilliant instinct. he suggested the shortest way . biden arrives, putin arrives, they shake hands, they discuss , they draw something. yes, they agree. in no case can this be viewed through the prism of irony, this is a real option. here, yes. and you will see when, sooner or later, this option will be implemented, because they will probably come to an agreement anyway. superpowers. well, maybe it will be electricity . lukashenka heard in the united states of america the other day, who commented on this. donald trump said that putin is president? there would be no 24 hours of war. let's listen to what arguments he

accompanied everything. people i literally on the same night as i find out my pobeda i will call two people , you know who i won’t tell putin and zelensky. them. we need to meet. we'll meet, i guarantee i can work things out. i know exactly what to say to them, i will tell this one to the other the second and i will tell you better reach an agreement. we will conclude an agreement within 24 hours. we offer the initiative, and trump is her dress. this suggests that this initiative is absolutely sensible and pragmatic, and it can really ensure peace between the two countries, when european politicians begin to lie that there is no way to peace now lukashenka understands everything perfectly, realizing the situation shows once again . it's all this way it's simple. you just don't want to be is all. that's the truth, let's continue the conversation, finally, trying to understand, after all

for whom biden came, and who needed this meeting with us more in kiev. and we continue the biden in kiev, uh, we were surprised. well, you're definitely not surprised. no, sorry, yes, i probably wasn’t surprised, because biden had, but one chance to go to aga and uh, walk around the polluted yes american polluted territories and at least try to explain something to trump’s root electorate. as a matter of fact, vagae, yes to people who do not earn very much, and then they will also live in the infected territory and drink the infected water could come. yes, as long as it's not in aha , that's the trick for him.

it was the day of the presidents of the united states well, this is the official name of the day of the presidents, he could spend it either with his electorate, and where he gets the maximum points, and he did it, his electorate looks at, uh, foreign policy, or he could spend it with a republican with a stranger with the electorate specifically, he lags at home and get by the hat. he estimated weighed and not the most that he decided decided his headquarters simply where he can get the best press the best and big press. he was able to get in kyiv oh which, strictly speaking, there was no need, uh, to look for two options. the only question was whether he would get the same good press from warsaw. yes, he would most likely get yesterday's. e last. well, the first comments, after his speech, said that yes, the people went in, because his speech was built on the simplest repetition of what was already known without overworking. plus

there were kids at the end. the children were chinese. uh, blacks, well , typical ukrainians are also yes, this is a sign, we work in a system of signs. we need to get used to it. sorry, these are volumes. we need get used to the fact that we work simultaneously in the real plane and in the system of signs. and if now for some politician the system of signs gives more points, he works with the system of signs. what does uh mean for what does it mean for us? here, let's practically conclude, i absolutely support the sign system of symbolism. we will see that in general western culture is involved in this. not only, by the way, western, yes, and what symbols should we then use to generate new ones or raise them? uh, it's our choice. and this we return to the first the question is, do we want to create a new symbol system? or should we really invest in promoting traditional values, sadly it

sounds, but the simplest things. i, we are the mother of the world, that's what we wrote in cursive there in schools in kindergartens, the first words that we drew. now all this works not through words. it works through images of emotions. yes we need to come up with new advertising that would act on the younger generation when you started talking about the fact that the people's militia will rely on adults even, well, even the old people yes, that's right, but when we talk about the example of israel, the example of israel begins with what the example of israel begins with the fact that everyone knows that they will go into the army at a young age of kindergarten, it’s completely fair and when the first political magazine is designed for younger students. this is fine. yes, it is necessary to work with a younger audience and yes , through the language that they have, maybe it is not necessary to come up with a new value system. need to invent a new language language

images language of emotions. which would now be perceived by a young youth audience , which would give the effect of trump when he speaks in short, clear words, he, when he speaks with politicians, he uses longer words when he speaks in public space. he defines short words biden tries, knowing that he speaks badly , tries to keep silent altogether. everything in the system of views is tense, or and so on. yes, no matter how funny it sounds, but they work through emotions in order to connect, including young people, one moment this is not the first time that the united states of america is betting on external factors in solving internal problems. so was the centennial visit. biden. this is another business visit. listen to me today ukraine and europe are the main source of income for the united states of america this year. they've made millions of dollars and they want to make

millions more. i came to watch investments, so that everything would spin and spin , launched ukraine to the last ukrainian. fight came to warsaw, prepare the poles to the last pole. close borders. come on, choke. we are the money he will come to the white house and tell the representatives of the military-industrial complex. how many more contracts? how many millions? how much more land will they take? how many businesses is money. now i absolutely agree about the meanings, for example, watching the speech of the president of russia, i was more interested in the non-military component, which was mused all over. and what's the point? what are the meanings? what new value orientations for development within russia will there be in the coming decades, because this is important for belarus because we are the union, i heard many. uh, many paid attention to one more such moment, and i ask her for cheese. show this video, and zelensky his facial expression when he met biden, it smiled, they hugged each other, but when

the bilateral and extended meeting took place. look at his face. it is evil. and this anger. he cannot hide , and many are now wondering what biden could say to zelensky, that the president of ukraine has become gloomier than a cloud to say, here's what not to say or say, because i i think deep down zelensky understands this little circus and the game that he himself plays. and when he sees that in fact there is no experience, all these beautiful words are not for zelensky, zelensky is like steel , ukrainians are like steel. well, does he really not understand in the depths of his soul that they promised me to use the planes. uh, common words for all requests, as americans know how to communicate , smile from ear to ear, of course. everything, let's see. tomorrow after tomorrow. and how will they do it? i will look only at my own interests only for their own interests. and there will probably be many words, yes, the effect of the us president's visit turned out to be not the one that the kiev regimes were counting on. it was calculated to be

natural. on the inner surface, it is more to provide, additional financial military assistance, primarily the supply of fighter jets, perhaps the ukrainian regime, it’s no secret , is negotiating to drag in at least some way. uh, at least some kind of nuclear warhead, yes, in simple terms . just some tactical nuclear weapon. at least just place it in kiev . they think it will be insurance. i don't have such conversations, but what about these victorious reactions, what do they say? here baydin hugged zelensky well, you remember how he was hugging a korzai from afghanistan , and like, uh, three weeks before fleeing afghanistan , that means, uh, a telephone conversation took place with the president in the next drive of afghanistan. and biden. said what it means to support america and afghan democracy. she is unshakable, and

in 3 weeks. the afghans were already hanging on the chassis, to escape from this very afghan democracy, so uh, so, uh, everything is strategically clear. they need a meat grinder here. here they need a regional war for the americans and they need us to be involved, that's not just the americans, and i'll just support it. you can continue. uh, the munich security conference is essentially a manifestation of the fact that no matter how we talk about the west, they are united in their anti-russia in this project of theirs, and risha sunk , the shortage of weapons among the european members of the atlantic alliance should not cause panic depletion of europe's military arsenals is not a problem and the main argument. as he explains it, they were already intended against russia , well, uh, stoltenberg nato secretary general in the alliance is not as afraid of the third world war as russia's victory in the conflict in ukraine , that is, we must be perfectly aware that we see what happened in munich it should

be cut into quotes and within. here. uh, that active brisk information policy that we need, as i said. gleb means to show it on all channels, because this is not just some kind of score of russophobes. it's some kind of score. e of a person of a hateful ideology, what they said there does not fit into the head of a normal person and a european. that is, uh, if you remember, the previous munich conferences, well, uh, sharp grin, they never bared it means that they put a lot on this war very simply before, you excuse me, i can’t help but say that you you know, we have been trying for decades to change the government in russia and say so. and this belarus should become. and this saw everything with my own eyes. well, it hasn't worked out yet. let's think about how they are now using the situation in ukraine and change the government. this is what all people should know. that is the price of democracy by choosing freedom. we say it, sometimes people don't understand, some

listen to the macron, listen to the ball. and when lexus and vovan called him, and he said openly, this is a gray area. it's not the people who live there. this is our territory, let's figure it out. that's right. you know that it is alarming that they have loosened their tongues in such a way, this suggests that they are still confident in their victory, they bank. they are precisely because to speak like that to the whole world. uh, it means that they spit on diplomatic norms, that they use negotiations in order to deceive partners, that the arsenals were already intended for russia. that is, how can this be explained? this can be explained by the fact that their current operation. well, excuse me, i'll get in , again from my side, maybe not in time for their current operation to be quickly completed, because at the same conference in the fields, they met with the vans. and with him they behaved in a completely different way,

because they know what their senior desks are. nyor, right now he's scratching his turnips and thinking it's necessary. here's something quick. win, because china will start next and china will start in full. china will start on the whole indian. in the pacific region, in parallel with this, a massacre for artificial intelligence and a conference in the hague will begin. on february 14, the military use of artificial intelligence was proclaimed with the filing of the united states the same exercises in the arctic ocean for the first time in military fighters in e, in the north of greenland this is all that they already they see, and they are still stuck in the old war, they are still stuck in a war where real resources are divided. and they will continue to fight for virtual, so they are ready today. yes, they are ready for a quick win here, because they have no other option, if they do not win quickly here, then they lose there

completely join. there it was said here that, uh, why is zelensky so sad well, yes, sad sad unsatisfied, we will say yes in a simple way. eh why? i will express my version, because what he wanted hear, of course, it didn’t sound, but in my opinion, biden is also preparing for the twenty -fourth year for the elections. and what kind of luggage does he come with? and this is his trip to ukraine, what do we have, right? this is also evidence that he has nothing to show the americans in foreign policy that he has in his luggage. e about the munich conference. yes, there was a high-ranking representative of china, with whom contacts were supposed to take place before the conference, but then, uh, because of this chinese probe, these contacts did not take place, then

there is uh, the european establishment has no idea what will happen next and china uh, the intrigue is that there are no statements from him about what his vision is for the continuation of this conflict, so uh, now i think that there will be the last breath of this of the collective west to pump up arms in order to win quickly and win, if that means they will negotiate, china, isn’t this ivan’s vision of china and just on the sidelines of the munich conference. that many times he was called now one of the highest ranking chinese diplomats. he says we are convinced about ukraine, we are convinced that this crisis situation can only be resolved through peaceful negotiations. this is the first time. well , the second is the message, first of all, to the ukrainians, probably, some forces do not want peace in ukraine and their strategic goals extend beyond the borders of this country. that is, what we all said today, ukraine is not the goal. yes, this is only an intermediate stage, yes, let's go. the fact is that the collective west sees that it is two steps ahead

europe is still calculating, but the americans are calculating much further and any wars. no matter how much they continue, it still ends with negotiations and peace, therefore, if in the near future, they will be activated. here are these attempts to seize the initiative to achieve great success, for which in order to have more advantageous conditions for negotiating. that's the maximum they expect. uh, the side of the west sounded that you can’t defeat a nuclear power, so about a comprehensive victory, it’s possible for uh, our e oppositionists say that we will win in ukraine and take on belarus, but everyone who is sensible and objectively evaluates. they understand that there is no victory, because there will be no more objective conditions for peace in order to make peace and concentrate, including on countering china, because the us national security strategy china comes first, not russia and couldn't

answer. normally, they could answer the question, who asked him, but listen, and you can substitute weapons for ukraine. why am i not i can supply weapons to russia, what's wrong with that? what is the difference borol tried to explain that this is different, but i think that a normal explanation cannot be sounded. of course, here is another question so that we somehow put it together, here are different, but the opinions that were voiced today. in this program, when you really observe what is happening in ukraine, you try to understand how they came to such a life that it is clear that there are many different factors, but at the same time you need to understand that there is an important internal factor. at some point, they played politics, pulled, pulled, tore the state and poured in or demons in various stripes. the nazis we see now are tanks that drive with crosses. these nazi greetings, and the assignment of the honorary title of edelweiss to one of the brigades and so on, the west does not see this. why because he already

played this card in the 20th century, anaha, it works well and now we are building a civil society. we continue to build laws on political parties on civil society, updated status. here how can we build our civil society in such a way that after a while it does not turn into a rupture. where, in ukraine, these demons will pour in, there are nazis, and we are somehow trying to replace them. the idea of ​​patriotism , let's pack into the idea of ​​patriotism something that has nothing to do with patriotism and some uncle across the ocean will tell us how and with whom to wage war. here is oleg sergeevich what we should focus on today is a very complex topic, but i will try to be very brief. the first is not to confuse democracy with permissiveness and lack of law and the absence of any rules in politics and in the construction of civil society. this is the first mistake of ukraine when everything should be democratic, everyone can be.

so what if it's a fascist democracy? so what if this party opposes the constitution, they have the right to vote. this is democracy and freedom. so what, they want to move to belarus to remove the russian language with the states to destroy the constitution, all we have done is democracy. this is the first mistake that you should never make, so that this does not happen, and the second error. this is an external factor, let's say politics, ukraine collapsed first. the ussr allowed it, belarus i watched recently. you know, this should be shown on tv . when i sit down, i can name nothing terrible tikhonovskaya sits and communicates with the head of the soros foundation, and he complains, belarus is one of the first countries that kicked us out of here. so this is our happiness, thanks. lukashenka must be told to remove the external factor from politics forever, as soon as we launch them here, these funds of these diplomats who are sitting at round table, and we count them, as we have elections or before you know, we will

try democratically to meet your standards. and you hear us hear us end. all the collapse from the outside two points should not be confused with democracy with the law, and the second is to remove the external fact, and then we will not let this happen, the corresponding hmm mechanisms should be created, and they have already been created. that is the first stage. here is the formation. it is finished with a new political reality, that is, a law on political parties on civil society , all belarusian people's assemblies completed the change in the electoral legislation. yes, the next stage is already next year, a reboot of such a political system, but in ukraine, uh, this is the situation . hmm to this situation. they did not come in one year , uh, at least three decades, the entire political elite was decomposing , including because the means of production in ukraine all belonged to the oligarchs. in our country, this

means of production belongs, uh, to the belarusian people and, of course, the oligarchs played with their puppet parties. this is what they led to, by the way, very interesting figures raised, exactly a year ago , when the government of ukraine was discussing the budget of the verkhovna rada, it gave a certificate explaining the number of people living in ukraine and there it was. the number was recorded with the government at 35 million. this imagine there were 51 million. according to correspondence in soviet times in the ninetieth or ninety-first, it became 35, what happened to these thirty-five and a half are now officially in russia, five more in europe, that is, -10 and another 5 not taken into account anywhere, but also scattered around the world usa canada latin america that is , now there are no more than 20 million

people in ukraine. this is what we say, why this is what the irresponsible politicians, who were yes, perhaps more attractive to the youth, led to . and they entered, therefore they lost this information war on images. uh, so, uh, the russian side, but in the end, look what happened as a result of a belligerent country with a catastrophically low level for such a territory. the population and so, in order to prevent this, we launched this formation of a new political reality. and they will not allow these laws, rules and procedures, regulations. they will not allow such people as in ukraine to come to power and never hear. if the two key components yes are external internal policy factors and e, information control. yes, we allow, we can prevent politicians. all the more the same. uh, the fascists in germany

came in a democratic way, so, and the first country that expelled von soros on a grand scale was just the same in great britain, if you remember yes, a small the story is like this. e, yes, it is possible to physically restrain at the level of the system of internal barriers some individuals or political parties from being present in politics. it can be done from the other side until we control the information space. to popularize our image and we will not invest real money in advertising the simplest things, and then more complex things. we can't keep the next and next and next generation from choosing bright blanks, overwhelmed by technology. friends with foreign structures speaking different languages ​​and dressing nicely and they

will also have nice socks, yes, like rows. here we will not be able to, we will not be able to fix the political reality forever in a situation where no external force is able to push through its man. if we are not able to control information information control, today the primary control of information based on the control of the emotional ee of the cultural ideological sector. yes, but cultural information about this here are very subjects literally for a minute, therefore, supplementing our system of checks of contradictions of balances of barriers. we must take the best from these quarterers, because everything they do is in the information space. it's just brilliant. it was better that these quarterrs had money and cloakrooms, whom he did not spare anything to take,

ivanovich does not need what can become our amulet, what tasks do we have. here we talked about tools specifically to strengthen our society. if possible, say so in general, but no external influence can be productive if there is internal unity, if people are confident in the future, if they have stability, stability both in the economy and in politics and in culture and in all other and family relations , including, therefore, we have spiritual moral values. speaking in a scientific language, speaking in a simple way, then you need to hear your people speak and always pursue a fair policy. what the president of our country has repeatedly said, the main conclusion. in my opinion, which we made from the twentieth year. this is for us the modernization of all aspects of our society, including the political system and those changes to the constitution that may have been adopted back and are now being implemented by all the belarusian people's assembly and political