the motto of our participants is not to give up , to fight to the end, as far as i remember, you need to speak, do not laugh. they laughed at me . and i chose the option. betty times. it's like i remember exactly that in this word only the letter r is doubled. each time, they surprise us with their reasoning.

anton was the first rod, of course, as the abbreviation stands for. women's hockey line women's hockey league watch intellectually entertaining shows on belarus 24 tv channel. objectively, peace and creation are concentrated expression of what can be roughly called national ideas in the first lines. we are belarusians, peaceful people. even without it. we are always for peace. if you work here, you work, you find your niche in public life. you can develop here and reach a certain limit. further more, faster, stronger, we are building bridges of friendship and roads of prospects, we need to work. we need to rely on our family

, on those people who are in belarus who work for creation and for the world as a whole, that we, as a family, are ready with those who are not ready to take the path of betrayal to live together, and this is how, probably, thousands of belarusians , it became clear to me what to be proud of. and what to fight for, watch on the tv channel belarus 24, and netlands. kilometers approaching where you can joke out the chestnuts, which they hauled changed for us. koh pai, i'm nicole not poyrano azure. didn't understand.

people's bloodworms come to life for me. scar, i wish i had keyberali for us zhikhars and zhikharki of belarusian veskas even more teak belarusian songs and traditions. visit the cultural-historical project on the pirot pass on the tv channel belarus 24. millions of emotions, we can rejoice, be angry with divulation with mind jass, our emotions we are not in the spirit. and music is music, showing our emotions are fashionable. this emotional force is littorally taken. zadusha and the self that has already eaten with us becomes an integral puzzle of our residents.

this is my propaganda let's start last week there were a lot of interesting things, but we chose two main topics that it seems like it's a long time ago that we talk to the audience of our propaganda topic one and perhaps most importantly, we are talking about that there is a crisis of confidence all over the world, that world communities and associations, such as the united nations, are not able to really solve problems, but can only express concern, but at the same time belarus continues to be in these organizations. well, that's all, we also take part in meetings , listen to a bunch of unpleasant and biased in our address, vote against the resolution, which we insert our five kopecks of truth against us, without much effect, but we do not leave these organizations. but it can spit on everything and get out of all it obse and other about western and about american sites. they are useless to us if right now everything that they can accept there will be either very unprofitable for us personally or simply unprofitable

or in no way, because these statements do not affect anything. let's use a concrete example last week, the united nations adopted a resolution on ukraine, you know what the peculiarity of this document is, it says in paragraphs that the un calls for it confirms it declares again calls for notes calls for again declares moreover, the document is categorically one-sided, even at one point it calls for an end to the shelling of the critical infrastructure of ukraine. although it is not clear what it is, if no conventions. this is not prohibited in the conditions of a military conflict, and the western countries that compiled this petition want a ceasefire on the infrastructure of ukraine, but they do not urge not to shell the same infrastructure in russia, there were fewer such cases, but they still were, but in the resolution about shelling. blue word that is , he does not mind if they shoot at energy stations of russia, if only they did not shoot at

ukrainian ones. and also, of course, there, well, very cunning lawyers, we read, he calls for an immediate cessation of attacks on the critical infrastructure of ukraine wonderful. but those countries that drafted this resolution whether donbass is included in this paragraph or not, look how their lawyers turned out the collective west, like a collective sheep, believes that the donbass is the territory of ukraine, but you can shoot at the donbass because there are russians, but also with a resolution. it must somehow be removed, therefore, from paragraph resolution disappears word territories do not shoot at objects on the territory of ukraine for the west this means that the donbas shoot. after all, they can’t consider the donbass to be the territory of ukraine, but don’t shoot at ukrainian targets is a very free interpretation. if kharkov is occupied in the forest, this is a type of object of ukraine, shooting at it is condemned, if kharkov is occupied by the russian army then. you can shoot not an object of ukraine

; condemns, but in general, of course, the essence of this resolution putin must withdraw troops and stop the war. and after that, everyone should sit down and agree on something, so this is not about the ukrainian revolution, but anti-russian, but he is an organization, like a serious document, like, how important, but in fact water that does not affect anything, right now these joint statements are only one function of the propaganda stage. every time this is such a media roll call, who is in the world under washington, and who , together with russia, spoke out against the petition with moscow belarus series north korea eritrea nicaragua and not enough? i do not argue, yes, and the composition is not the most powerful than moscow is trying to kick, but on the other hand. and who voted for the resolution, that is, against the giant and nuclear russia andorra sigou and barbuda, the bohemians of barbados, belize binin, bhutan batswana, brunei, and so on, these are only the first two letters of the alphabet. and now the main thing

is that the state of antigua and barbuda has a concern with ukraine, in general, antigua and barbuda are not afraid to vote for anti-russian sanctions, this is their conscious choice, but there they have no idea where ukraine is and vice versa, it has turned into an organization where one strong player says when to press the button, and all the democratic trifle just presses me. it seems like they are responsible for the bazaar, but it is limited, the main claims need to be made only to washington what alexander lukashenko told reporters on saturday after looney, there a strong state puts pressure on e, less america prints dollars dollar will give you. if you vote, you won't vote better. i have been many times and he has seen it. where is this organization? well, a platform where you can talk about something to discuss has never made a normal decision beneficial

to okay, not in the war. may poverty be reduced in the world. let some help be given to the poor fellow. let them work at least on humanitarian issues, but there is a discrepancy everywhere. that is, he is now such a talker , it seems to not affect anything, but you can be heard. do we need this or not? trying to tell her truth there, which is of little interest in antigua and barbuda, and no one will even try to listen to her so that we can do. can we withdraw from the un and not participate in all this theoretically, can we speak of such obligations? we do not have. this is how our world is written. minsk suspends membership. in view of the futility of organizations and it seems like everything is very correct, he is very proud. to the delight of many of our and not our citizens, they say. here is how the belarusians wiped america's nose and resolutely slammed the door well. this gives us something, except short satisfaction from his own audacity and determination, it seems like nothing, yes, and we are among the founders of the organization, which

also obliges him to not accept less anti-belarusian resolutions. there will not be less anti-russian anti-guarbut of latvia and lithuania automatically voting against russia. there are only six voices sharply against the anti-russian resolution, but it would be better if there were zero of them, perhaps this is the emotional step they are seeking from us. we are now at the stage of reassessment of ourselves as a state and it’s wonderful that we began to understand that we are not a patch in the center of europe , but a strong country that can have the will and power if you need to go against the whole world, if necessary, if for russia well, you don’t need to overestimate yourself either, russia’s exit and the o zone yes, it will actually mean the termination of the organization, because there are an infinite number of reasons for this. well, what about? well, let's be honest, if we suddenly leave it, it will be unpleasant for such an american, but on the whole it's fine. so

we'd better keep on talking truth, but after a while humanity. after all , it will return to the question of who was who in this redistribution of the world. do we really need such international platforms? and in principle, dialogue with the west, you know, is needed for one equally important reason, that they are waiting for us to leave there, you never have to do as your enemy or adversary wants, this is an axiom, so we will not leave there. let them lie. let them scream. we must go our own way dog ​​barks caravans john that's the principle. we must live and work. a friend falls under the definition of a dog richard kolls is a latvian deputy who, at the osce parliamentary assembly, with the same phrase about a russian warship, sent russia into three letters, what is rehart kols naturally talking about? he immediately made a tweet, posted on the internet and began to hype, because everything that is done in this pro-western policy is done for the sake

of one hype with offensive words in the direction of moscow, she also delayed it insultingly, what can russia spektr do in this case wide. here is a verbal condemnation of richard before , let's say, in anticipation of a situation when suddenly koles chokes to death twice in a row on a raisin bun. after all, this sometimes happens with citizens boldly sending russian ships somewhere. in general , it is possible to tow latvia beyond the urals and hold a referendum there, this is russia’s business, but for us, this is the transformation of the osce into swearing stand-up shows, where it swears. they just shout for some reason under applause, then they sing, then they dance, but they don’t say normally for us. what does it mean? maybe, we, too, should not take owls with us to the meeting, but a robin, so that he would say even more clearly there, and perhaps even draw who should go where, who should sit where, what where to take and what to spin around, will we personally occupy

the litter, the first strips of their newspapers for sure. here are their newspapers, it is unlikely that we will not say, and how their newspaper will be written badly in our country. that's when the same illuminator says that the fugitive scum of their propaganda will hysteria, that you can't be rude from the screen in the state. that's when some latvian at a meeting of the diplomatic council international organizations aloud sends a sovereign country to three letters in their direct text propaganda of joyful bursts in the palms. how wonderfully bold and fresh or not nasa mourned and not the russians, they showed their faces once again. who is this latvian guy? who is he? you insult the russian rus, who saved you from the brown plague, at least thought about it, but didn’t think about it. in general , our deputy savinykh in the osce will continue to culturally convey the position of belarus. she is a representative of the fishermen and will continue to speak from the podium. subtly, teasing opponents. maybe the effect of this is not so much? as we would like, but certainly

more than from screams or from our absence there. to do this, of course, they will need nerves of steel, we believe that modern rybakov and not have at least half the same nerves of steel and just as strong. well, you understand what kind of alexander lukashenko, who began his presidential career with a reflection of attacks, russia wants to capture us, almost three decades have passed, these folders have remained exactly the same, and now the second topic of today is a question to the president from my colleague yevgeny postovoy european journalists conducted an investigation that in 2030 russia had strategic plans for belarus in 2020. russia will eat us, i know what you're talking about. in general, in the very question. as for me , the answer is contained, indeed, some type of document on strategy, such as the capture of belarus by russia, appeared on the internet, who

compiled it? maybe somewhere in the kremlin, maybe ukraine or the cia chick or maybe city crazies in antigua and barbuda, no one has no idea. well, the journalist says there are plans in russia and there is a big difference between the phrases in russia there are plans to absorb belarus and russia has plans to absorb belarus if in russia those who would like us to become a subject of the federation it is obvious what is and even where -something in high cabinets, if in russia, including in the same cabinets of those who, on the contrary, would like a complete severance of relations between moscow and minsk of course, there are both of these rude minorities. they can quite get together and write some strategies before this or any another year and western journalists can find out about it and can print this story. and that in russia there are those who recognize the earth as flat. this does not mean that russia recognizes it in russia, maybe someone has a strategy for absorbing germany in the uk japan china pluto or the milky way is all free fantasy in

a completely free country russia has a strategy of cooperation as a sovereign state. belarus is actually deployed about this and alexander lukashenko answered , i do not rule out that this document was. it was 3 years ago, when we came to the formation of maps. now there are 28 union programs. when we approached this, there were different points of view, someone said so, someone said this, although in this document, perhaps, some officials were proposed by a group of people in the presidential administration. which way will we go with belarus i also have different groups. and you offered your ideas, i hear them from our deputies, there were different proposals. here , you remember the entry of russia into belarus, when i need belarus to join composition of russia why in the composition of russia

because russia will enter there in belarus, remember the nineteenth twentieth year. therefore, this is all bullshit, by the way, i am completely convinced that there are much more than belarusians who want belarus to join russia, there are russians who want russia to join belarus in absolute numbers , i’m definitely not sure in percentage, but in general, that write in all these strategies is called zones of influence. we are in the zone of influence of the hegemon of russia and russia, of course, has some kind of strategy to keep us out of this zone of influence let go, because they want to drag us into the zone of influence of the european union or into the zone of influence of poland, which itself is strongly in the zone of influence of the united states and everyone has a strategy at our expense to drag us to their side and every country, including, of course, russia, implements this strategy and we are implementing our strategy of drawing into someone's zone of influence or not drawing it in exactly the same way as

we are trying to draw a little bit of lithuania, latvia more than ukraine and russia into our zone of influence, and in all this, under the temple, we are guided by national interests, that there are benefits, all this is called politics, thanks to which we in a sovereign country improve the well-being of our citizens. we have our own strategy. russia also has a nuclear major power. it has its own strategy , and russia has its own strategy with respect to belarus, including to live, as with its brothers, in peace and friendship 100%. nothing alive in this is my position. you know it's unchanged. we are not a dependency of a confident state, being an independent sovereign with russia, who stands next to no one except belarus, here recently one western the journalist told the president that all the people in the city with whom she spoke in the city were, like, against lukashenka in the country, 20% of the people

did not vote. for alexander grigoryevich . ok, this is official. numbers, that is, out of ten passers-by, eight will be for lukashenka. two are against, but when 10 passers-by see a foreign journalist who will obviously turn everything upside down in her report, and, in general, why will eight who voted for lukashenka pass by her and this journalist will not do anything he will say, and two will stop and curse the authorities, then, of course, yes. it turns out that everyone i talked to is a journalist against lukashenka. and if i stand at exactly the same point with an ont microphone, then 8 people who voted for lukashenka will come up and tell how clean and beautiful it is in minsk, and two who did not vote for lukashenka will pretend that i don’t exist, and then i’ll also say that everyone with whom i spoke, they are all for aleksandra grigoryevich and a western journalist to build their reporting strategy on the fact that everyone is against lukashenko and i’ll build my strategy on the fact that everyone is for and we will both be wrong. although in very different degree. i

don’t know why there may be some strategies in russia on belarus and they exist, and in belarus on russia there may be and they also exist, but countries also have strategies and only they matter. so do not be fooled by lies and fakes, be careful from the place of estates and pretexts, and remember that politics is very difficult. but it's very interesting. my name is igor tur. it was my propaganda to be honest, if someone is to work, not very much a burden, there is nothing attached to the village. do looked back. after your work looked at the garden. i looked at the tomatoes. what

a beauty ripe mature on earth, you have to work categorically says the hero of the new issue of lishakov, but at the same time he finds time for his outlet. i go to kobrin for rehearsals. my soul goes there. i can't live without it, and everything pulls me like a magnet to get acquainted with the headman of the village of diagilets and the participants. he himself is fucking, kobrin harmonica alexander petushok is not a scam and great-grandmother. they used to go to church there, watch them on belarus 24 tv channel. the electric monster is so

called a scientist with belarusian roots, who was able to change the rules of nature itself. you are not afraid of the consequences, because, as far as i understand, your experiment is associated with high-power energy, the results of his work were admired and feared at the same time, watching the atmosphere. i realized that she was just full of energy. with the approach of a thunderstorm, its concentration increases. i thought. is it possible to somehow use it figuratively speaking , to bring it down from heaven to earth. he possessed some kind of supernatural. by the power of thunder documentary film and yakub norkevich and otkatka lightning tamer or electric man. there are several hypotheses, but there is no definitive point of view, so it will take more years and a lot of

experiments. watch on thursday on belarus 24 tv channel

. at the beginning, briefly about the main topics of the releases , many hours of communication, despite the severity