the weighty university has many topics for discussion the anatomy of the ukrainian conflict the unequivocal position of the world of belarus a second chance for those who stumbled young people were interested in questions of the constitutional reform of party building the conversation turned out to be frank. we would like feedback to understand what worries young people here in retirement on a breach, that many people from the region are studying at this university. the university is interesting, but feedback is also extremely important for us, what the guys will tell us. that is, we want here to communicate frankly informally not to read any lectures of notation in any case. we are confident that the potential of the regions. it is much more powerful even than the potential of the capital or regional centers, because , as practice shows, it is the guys from the outback, the guys from small areas that become very serious leaders, social activists, specialists in the future , people who can be proud of on the right side. most importantly, together we will shape

the image of the future and strive for the theory of implementation, open conversations with young people will be held in all higher and secondary specialized institutions of the country among the speakers, leaders, political scientists and media personalities of belarus new information from my colleagues in the hours on our air good luck social and political talk show in essence today we will talk about the concept of national security together with our experts, but i remind you that each of you

can join the discussion. there is a qr code at the bottom of the screen. and here is your smartphone with you, as usual kirill kazakov and alena serova see in november 2010 was signed, the current concept of national security. well , as a matter of fact, it seems to me that the situation has changed a little bit in this case, i'm already even trying to be rude. look, in 2010 such statements could have followed, which we heard yesterday , the border committee says that there were no skirmishes on the ukrainian border. what a shootout on the ukrainian border in 2010 in 2010 we didn’t know anything about, for example, covid-19, we really thought that we were trying to build some kind of, independent state, while being equally friends with both the west and the east in 2010 - this is in principle. here. well, if you rewind 13

years ago like this, it seems to me that a little time has passed in terms of history, but in terms of the changes that have happened, a huge period indeed. we live in our time, which takes place in ukraine, we live in time. tectonic geopolitical changes and at this time we really need to change somehow our concept of national security, because the world plus everything has changed, and a year ago we adopted a new constitution in a referendum - this is the people's constitution, we discussed it for a long time and chose those items that we really need. a year has passed, our civil society is changing, the party political system is changing. all this must be taken into account, including in the concept of national security, again, of course, that this concept of national security , in general, will already be adopted according to our new rules. that is, it will be approved by the belarusian people's assembly and the president on last week. speaking of which,

i said to this concept that we will not hide it, like so many states. we will talk about it openly. and here, in fact, this program. here through these those rather conversations, when we can discuss. and perhaps remember that the concept of national security is not only about weapons. yeah , it's about the economy. this is about m-m ecology. in general, this is actually about everything that alexander mikhalych is, look at the concept of national security from the point of view national security. clearly, we are talking here about defending the country, for example, harvesting and storing a certain amount, that is, we are, in fact, preparing for some kind of emergency somewhere, but from the point of view of the region. look, in 2010 there was no fence from latvia. corpses from latvia are not thrown to us. somehow, even such black news, it will affect how

the concept of national security will change regional politics. you know, but i don't think there will be anything at the regional level change conceptually, after all, each region. this is an integral part of our wonderful motherland. that is why we are discussing the draft of this concept. it is, of course, broadcast to every region. maybe each region has its own characteristics, but all the same, it was rightly said that this angle is based not on weapons, but on the economy, social approaches, and food security. this year, the biological appeared a whole section of security. these are social things, therefore. uh, it's like a set of such tools, a set of requirements that we we must present to ourselves so that we live happily for a long time, and everyone envy us, therefore, after all, the concept at the regional level is just a way how to proceed further in order to

move progressively forward. look , continue. yes, this is an idea about comparing 2010 with these realities in which we find ourselves today. but i know alexander mikhailovich that you had a hand in the fragment that concerns biological safety. at the same time, i thought that, probably for very many, 13 years ago. ah. well, biological weapons, biological security - it was something very distant, very incomprehensible. and so, when a few years ago, it turns out that a pandemic began, and remember, opinions were very divided then and studied theories that were called conspiracy theories. well, in general, perhaps, time will put everything in its place. so the moment associated with biological safety, it was with the emphasis on this unit that it was caused by the pandemic. or you know something else, i will say that there is nowhere

without good, so life suggested that this section should be and, of course, we develop uh, i was working in the government at the time. we decided to focus specifically on disease prevention, at a minimum, and predicting what is happening at the distant frontiers and coming to our approaches, so that, speaking in military terms, dig trenches already in advance, but when we got together and began to develop the concept, it turned out that it is much more versatile. that is, they had to go in there. and not only diseases, and what is connected with the disease, but tribal business, that is, it turns out that we have almost the entire village. we all breeding material was imported almost from abroad. it's uh, creating a gmo organism. working with him is the creation of databases of genetically gifted people, and elite animal seeds, and so on. these are even species that come to us from abroad and then break our ecosystems. this is bo sosnovskaya, for example, which is terribly dangerous for humans. uh,

several types of beetle plants from the past, but then again, yes, but it turned out to be a concept. it does not just apply to medicine and veterinary medicine, that is, here the ministry for environmental protection. here the academy of sciences is very closely connected. that is, it is also such a prominent biological safety organism, and we had to work out all these areas too. and as you can see, it's all organically, woven into the overall national system, they began with a scientific one. yes, and finished. as you say, both seeds and breeding farms. well, this is all that we have now lost thanks to the males. yes, and now , in fact, that they started to work, supposedly in order to preserve the best, and now it turns out that this is the only thing the only thing. yes, but i emphasized that all the same, diseases still remain ahead of us, because we see what is happening in the world, we see these formed biological laboratories. friends in quotation marks, which

we see densely around the perimeter, new diseases arise, we see constantly mutating and not giving all the best in any, but evolutionary theory. e in virology is versus covid-19, so i think we are on the right track, that we are preparing , we are watching, we are predicting, and we are already trying to do something ourselves, here are the sanctions. yes, there believed that belarus was only in its sovereign history for several years there was no patsanktsiy. and probably their former concept. i think that the new concept will also have such a great emphasis on our economic security. here's how we will implement it sergeevich tell me thank you, well. in my opinion, the economy has now become radically different. in general, i defined it as the economics of risks, and this concept was formed in my eighteenth year. it was published in the eighteenth.

that is, i have not yet come up with the essence of it is that we, in principle, cannot predict what will happen in a year or two. well, the years have shown that this is the way we say the concept of risk economics. we discussed at the round table at the belarusian national technical university we had a round table with representatives of the secretary of state. it is the security council that has never mikhailovich participated in those present here on the merits. i think on the one hand. here the concept of national security should look at things a little differently, for example. why not include her following the example of germany, such a thing as a steady shortage of proposals. it’s exactly like this when it’s stable, you can’t, well, such a deficit, a shortage, what was not a proposal, that you don’t have some kind of resource , we see today that not everything can be bought for money. china doesn't sell everything. well, a year ago, the flows blow up. well, the northern streams blow up. it's even easier than when the market suddenly finds out that automakers

can't buy a bunch of semiconductors. because of this, american factories. automotive closed even before the events of the early twenty the second year are closed both in the united states and in south korea, and so on we will write. what it will give us, we will see threats. first, we will see that the stable identity in the sentence is threat optimization. that is, in economic terms, they will hit us all together with types of weapons, including information on individual enterprises. well, twenty-two. for the twentieth year this has already shown, let me remind you that it was described 2 years ago, when after this meeting the states communicated, but with mr. volfovich, and then he said about what we put into this, and the concept of national security, a certain margin of safety. well, how the concept of 2010 still says that we are changing it . not because it lived there or or there, it somehow turned out to be ineffective. no, we are laying, a certain margin

of safety. and how can this then correlate with the fact that everything changes every day, we can’t predict anything ivanovich , maybe it doesn’t make sense, in principle, to write the concept. why is it needed i will comment on the question to me the fact is that we get something completely different, that from the concept of economic security it ceases to be static, it is dynamic and we are constantly approaching it and reaching it, the situation is changing. we need to quickly give, only one or two examples , primarily on the tractor. it is known that the republic of belarus occupies more than half of the russian market, but for trucks, according to the results of last year, china they are, well, approaching 50% of the russian market . why didn't we fill this niche? well , i leave the question unanswered. oh good. can i now and where is the concept of national security here, we must understand that china is bypassing us and somehow take steps to compete china is bypassing us, this is not

the problem, but what we have turned out to be, that not all enterprises are ready dynamically, but the changing markets demand supply and, accordingly, precisely in terms of management of these enterprises management. if you like, it turned out that many enterprises are accustomed to living in very static conditions. they are, in principle, not prepared for the fact that the situation may change andrey ivanovich well, after all, yes, let me return to your opinion about why we need the concept of national security. here, uh, again, the secretary of state said that this document is the second most important after the constitution. well, you agree. approved after the constitution, probably the second most important document, and i will return to the issue of twelve years, in fact, this is not 12 years. we will accept it. a year later, in april 24 , a concept is planned and developed also not a year, but at least two years, that is, from the eighth year to the 24th is a fairly long period. e in russia, e,

the average term is 6 years. here they have a strategy in the savings basin was the ninth 15 21 years, and in poland for 22 in recent years. we changed our security strategy six times for the same uh, well, depending, in principle, uh, like in russia, too, there was a concept at the beginning, then i did it, that is, apparently from content , importance, significance, and so on. so the soil is this period from two to six years and my strategy is changing, because so everything is dynamic. it is now. if there is this project. uh, we are in fact at the crossing at the crossing to her does not change, but we have to, because in a year. something else will happen dynamics, what we have, yes, it is being updated a year ago, that is, this is before the developers. we are setting a very difficult task. eh, try to anticipate. uh, at least the medium term. how will these threats to our security develop and the fact that this concept has been working for 12-13 years. this indicates

the conscientious work of those developers of that working group that work because they were able to provide. yes, yes, yes, which we are still working on and relying on a fairly large amount of the situation to the end. that is, they say again, we accommodate the conscientious work of that working group. we have a little research. we have an indicator. yes, please show me the data. yes, colleagues commissioned by the bbc at the end of last year, the institute of sociology in belarus conducted a republican telephone survey on the concept of the savings basin. here , in principle, all spheres are represented here, uh, included in the new concept. this is how society assesses how secure our security is in these areas, how unsecured, that is, people are sure that we are in a very good state with protection in the field of political security, military environmental social, but look at the problems of economic security. uh, demographic scientific technology,

technical technological actually. yes , it's a small print. i mean, that's what needs to be worked on. and now this is the starting point, including for discussing the document. here the public, which will probably be for a whole year, almost 10 less, there will also be proposals and most likely , of course, there will be, of course, i don’t know, maybe later in the final version of the document it will be interesting to see the fact that it will be, in principle. this is to be accepted again, i say, it is all the belarusian people's assembly, uh, delegates, which we also have yet to determine and elect. yes, see here the scientific and technical technical yes, we are in last place. and i, too, am listening now to a conversation about what we may not have enough semiconductors. or, perhaps, something else is not enough even today, for example, the published lists of those smartphones hear $ 300, which is possible or impossible, and to import or export in belarus in belarus, that is, the europeans recommend that we

buy a refrigerator there for some amount and will not be brought here. refrigerator, the cost is more than $ 750, and the russians are accused of bringing microwaves and washing machines with ukraine, for the sake of semiconductors. after all, this is just the last point, because, well, we we do not hide the fact that we have salty iphones and well, there is no belarusian phone, unfortunately, that we can oppose this even to this statement. well, actually i would start. there is a well-known expression of the classics that practice without theory is blind, while theory without practice is dead, and yet it must be emphasized. uh, the concept, as an important theoretical document that allows you to build some practical steps and which allow you to build some kind of political line and strategy, tactics, and in this regard, a new version of the concept, which is already being discussed and we are present with you now, at the same time. uh , this is, in general, a step forward in theory , first of all, and we must note that

scientific and technological security, of course, worries many in this regard as well. uh, the belarusian national technical university, uh, offers and to say that these proposals have resulted in concrete ones. uh, so to speak, e appeals and uh the state committee on the science of these technologies to the academy of knowledge and the term and concept, as an innovation. security, well, what is innovation security is an issue related to innovative development. and so this suggestion is that security through development. uh, so to speak, in this regard, we can say that in any form of e-security, an innovative component is present and in the military we need, so to speak, modern weapons and demographic, because in order to ensure, e, the population, population squeezing and growth. uh, so to speak, the demographic needs to be provided from the very beginning, uh. uh, increasing

the birth rate, that is, the survival rate of children. it needs quests, it needs medicines in order to treat effective quickly. ah, biology is provided for everyone, then they will have themselves and their children. you understand the questions. this is connected not only with the pure economy, but we see that in politics this innovation is also widely used. this is the implementation of the achievements of scientific and technological progress in life, it is the implementation that is not just something new and when we talk about the knowledge society, which is again associated with all kinds of security , we mean that it should be a stream should be a constant investment. obtaining the result, well, look. i may not a very popular thing, i will say, but many people get the feeling that this is hmm our science-intensive production that exists in the country. yes, it still does not fully reflect the modern reality that is happening in the world. so what are we missing? yes

, even look here. i am from the world of science fiction artificial intelligence. now you can laugh at these two letters, and and, but in essence. this is the same thing that in a year or two may somehow have an impact on our security. if now there are some applications or programs that can write texts, and these texts can also become bills. and these bills can then be adopted by people. and we are talking about the fact that yes, we can make innovations in our country. and, in principle, we are talking about the fact that we have some kind of car there. perhaps there is some there. the call is possible, there is some kind of computer, but here we are somewhere beyond the realm of thinking of science fiction writers, and therefore we are told that you are a little retrograde. here we are in this retrograde they didn't drown theirs. of course not. well, firstly, we are an average european state

in order for the market to bring super profits, well, scientists believe that at least 200 million people are needed, yes, then the market begins to work out, but say we are lucky our neighbors and say the great china that are not far and uh, the russian federation uh, such resources, so to speak, have such a market and it does not seem that we still need to return to the theory why the concept? so, after all, we are laying some fundamental principles that will allow the entire economic complex to participate in development and provide security strategy say it after politics then tactics and so on. financing was discussed with the head of state today. yes, here is the purchase of weapons and, uh, i somehow remembered. eh, when? well, maybe in the spring i could be wrong, but it seems that in the spring there was also a meeting of the president, then the power bloc was going to, and uh, they talked about the rearmament

of the belarusian army. and hmm, how do we, in principle, build our defense, and he then he said that it turned out to be something that we emphasized in theory a few years ago. here in practice, which , unfortunately, we see right here at our borders. well, it's not very efficient and it doesn't work very well, so what do we do? fingers speak in journalistic language, it is necessary to turn over so, as far as we can be sure that those principles of alexander vladimirovich that we are now laying in this new concept will not turn out to be obsolete and we will accept it in twenty-four, and in twenty the fifth e will not have to change it with artificial intelligence from the realm of fantasy. i would like to finish the concept of this guide. to action. it is a guide that allows policy making. and if there were strategies, then this is already an action. well, for example, military strategy. they called their strategy frontier strategy. so, that is, this is

already the implementation of the principles that are embedded in the concept. thanks a lot. well, i'm lucky. i participated in the development of the concept back then at the academy of science, and then it passed, yes, further, but this is such training participated in the renewal of this concept. i generally want to disagree with a few words. the fact that the concept is generally built differently. it structures this model of our national security; it structures the space into spheres and regions. so you said that there is pro-dynamics in all spheres, both in political , economic and environmental, and what has changed? well, firstly, i would say that new components have appeared, about which you spoke the most powerful, which is based on what approaches to causing damage our national security. that is , what level of damage inflicted in a particular area to do, in addition, i want to say that

the concept itself was very well formulated. by the way, i want to draw your attention to the fact that other states practically didn’t imagine such a thing, because we have a whole system of indicators, and he is political , social, economic, and so on and so on, and the dynamics with the help of quantitative assessments, how does it change? and of course, there are new things. it's the same information sphere. i want to say that already in the tenth year there were the makings of what appeared now, but of course, the extraordinary development of what was and therefore new components are appearing, for example, in the information sphere. another feature that i would like to note is that almost every component can manifest itself in several areas. this was especially shown by the events of the twentieth year, when people made the same goals of the statement of action, and they manifested themselves in the political, economic, social and military spheres. sphere, because on me, but it's even

known on the game in the stock exchange. yes, when a political statement brings down the shares like that, well , as it were in this case, everything is clear that it's all interconnected. well, i’m talking about this and saying that the concept itself is built as a system tool, as a system. e , means the areas of activity in which there are indicators there are somewhere over 60, which are monitored and the state of these indicators determines the approximation means to the stability of the instability of states. and here the boundary of the legal tolerance, that is, people go beyond these limits. they damage the economy or not, that is, essentially. if we take the theory of management. this is the boundary of stability, which we cannot tell our partners and opponents about what places are needed e. what places do you need to put pressure on in order to directly destroy this stability of ours, well , firstly, why do we do this, practice has shown that our stability is not so easy

to destroy, that's why. uh, as you said about artificial intelligence. we have problems in a number of cases naturally. i would wanted to turn. i would like to draw attention to something else, that is, when we talk about this first saturation of computing technology. e, support for decisions being made, and only the next stage, when it will go automatically automatically, this is done in the case when there is no time left. and in general the whole concept. she, as it were, emphasizes the dynamics of the development of society, that is , the reduction of the time allotted for reaction and , roughly speaking, preparation, so that, as it was rightly noted , not to be as smart as my wife after that we observed and could predict the development of the situation. you see, and for this you need to structure and track. and tell me, who is this council of wise men, who follows all this, studies all these fluctuations and somehow tightens it up. in which direction every two or three years the concept

should change, so i want to say that it is like in any country. we have created appropriate institutions that are responsible for activities in their areas. and well , take today's meeting, the head of state invited the main yes scope security, but i want to say that really this work of a large number of people and analysts and those who choose information to structure problems is not to release any information and not to miss important events, so there is monitoring of short-term , medium-term monthly there, annual and so on. look at us, and in the chat they wrote that a, therefore, appeared in such a way that the erosion of the national cultural identity of the belarusian diaspora was attributed to the source of threats. usage belarusians abroad for destructive purposes to put pressure on belarus this is a new trend after the twentieth year and how dangerous. and i would from myself more. well, who here among you can already answer to determine for yourself, and

i would also add, such a question. eh, now, if this is a new trend after the twentieth, if so, then why didn’t we foresee it, we are talking about sovereignty, and this trend is observed in belarusian statehood. approximately 500 years, what are the poles talking about and this is the balba of cultural capture means political values. uh, it manifests itself during the intensity, then less then more. well, actually look as a result, after all, we have become an independent state. therefore, spiritual values, which means that the russians have this normatively incorporated in the documents. we have traditional values ​​about them. here, it is precisely the belarusian abroad that is trying to seize power from us. here, i'll just give an example, maybe lately, right? well, look at the last elections in may sandu moldova, and so, when they conducted a study, who is like for her voted, then for the most part i know. himself

would be the president of moldova, which is a citizen of romania and talks about nato. the course of this state for it, for the most part , was voted abroad by those people who left back. and if those who live in moldova had voted, that is, in the real situation of the country in which she will rule, then she would not have won. this is just one of the examples of how much foreign countries can influence the internal situation . on the part of alain, you can answer two questions, as you asked, you were left without answer first why is it open? because the idea that takes hold of the masses is invincible and the president is perfectly wise. i determined that this should be a general discussion and during this year there were many conferences , many seminars. and now we are already on television. i didn't see who your new ones really might be. yes, we are very very

in vain sometimes talking about what we have fenced off with seminars and conferences. here is just a discussion from you. that is, we discussed and seemed to have heard everything, it’s not always like that, true. that’s why we pull out such topics for discussion on talk shows, because we are trying to chew it in human ordinary language. look, we 've been talking about the concept of national security for half an hour. believe me, most of the viewers who sat down to watch the program were sure that this was a military right, and a military man also carries with us. you can have a short answer. so , article 107 is determined by the constitution of the republic of belarus - this is not advice , well, look, firstly, one military man. secondly, we have not yet talked about the military oleg olegovich here is the concept of the national security, first, as a teacher, and how much will change or you are already trying to change. eh, some postulates of this particular concept, perhaps some. well, i don't know

if there are timely changes. yes, in your training, uh, the cadet of the military academy in particular the faculty. he really wants to, and the second thing we met last week was also talking. here is the simplest question that again the president raises the question of the people's militia when he was talking about the concept of national security. uh huh, that's for the majority. these words are synonyms. or rather , the situation is still the knb is equal to the people's militia. what is changing and what is the people's militia? here we are as people we are afraid of nothing or not to be afraid, does not even suspect and does not link these things. maybe i'll put the point here is about the conference seminars. you have not heard about the formation itself. yes, here is the concept of a security center by interdepartmental commissions, because a specialist works. and now here is a talk show and now there is a period where this is put on public display and people. now they will hear and know about it. what can i say about the military component of the concept of security?

yes, we see that since january 1, 2023, there have already been several dozen offensive exercises in poland, the baltic states, respectively, we have already discussed biological laboratories, which are practically near us and in other countries under the auspices of the united states, we see that in general analyzing the us national security strategy it says that they are the guarantor of world stability. uh, in case of a pandemic and any disease. yes but they are recommended. they always have the character of causing damage, because our direction to which we went is completely different, uh, which the head of state chose, and we see that it is correct uh in the concept of national security from the military sphere. uh, three are allocated on let's say. so uh direction. these are challenges, risks and threats. what are they for? eh, there were no cases before that, it was, uh, let's put it this way. e will help us to draw conclusions after the forty-first year. why? because

here are three categories, and that is, we are so far away look beyond forty. the first year we have other loved ones closer. no, they just understand. as an example, what did you understand, why did i take the forty -first year, because somewhere we were fully prepared for aggression now, to be ready for aggression. we structured. and the threats that may come from us, and the risks, challenges and threats are three components in terms of scale, thanks to which the state will be able to adequately respond and, in particular , the military bloc. well, somehow like this, well, the people's militia. here is the people's militia. yes, uh in case of martial law, it's clear, uh, what the armed forces will do. uh, the structures of the internal troops of the ministry of internal affairs will, uh , restore order within the state, and the civilians will be engaged in industry. that is, it is clear that someone will need the economy on a military footing. bet and so on, but in the case when the enemy is nearby, of course. eh, let's put it this way. this large number of men can voluntarily take up arms and

defend their home, and i will correct you, and the minister of defense said that not only men, but definitely women. yes, feminism at the end of the national security is also embedded as a threat to fashionable e, three letters e. yes. that is, we used to have a different word for pmc trans. now everyone already knows this. look here, right? well, and katka, yes, have you taken into account am? is such a factor taken into account as the threat from pmcs in the national people's republic of belarus. and i will say more. here pmcs are mentioned here, even the military doctrine, in my opinion, is the sixteenth year. uh, here, if you look at how the military, the doctrine, describes, modern military conflicts are 95% the developers foresaw what would happen now

in ukraine to pay attention, that is , for this period of time, our armed forces were preparing for today's war, not for the past, but for the present. that is, this concept of a dude, we already have a hybrid in the documents of the past. history is in everything. yes , including pmcs, yes, we are talking about the fact that one way or another , any changes in the concept, well, affect society, from the point of view of, uh, such legislative activity, as in principle. this will affect your work and whether everything will affect whether the members are called will affect unequivocally. and by the way, here we are today more than once, we talked about how people in general will perceive the concept, how exactly to me just as a person. it will be important to start with the most important thing, because right away we say that security is the provision of the totality of all methods and views of the personality of society and the state. pay attention to

the first place is the personality, which means each of us is a society and then the state. and, of course, the law of the creative process, that 's what the process is for, because it is not static and it is natural over time. pay attention here are all the areas that we talked about, yes, here is according to the sociological study that was and what is included in the concept in the draft, by the way, speaking of the updated concept, almost any bill covers and is aimed at ensuring national security. we can take anything potholes on the road there, i'll tell you seriously, government devices, demographics, medicine, everything that anything that goes through the legislative process. this is one way or another aimed at ensuring national security. moreover, what concerns the economy today is one of the most global issues. first, today we

are talking about equal conditions from the state to public and private organizations. yes, that is, we are talking about state-private partnerships today, and we have been constantly in this one for several decades, but there are very important points, which, by the way, again. they too incorporated into the concept. here is the updated one. today we are talking about strategic allies and strategic partners, and this destroys us in the first place. let's immediately explain to those who have not read the current concept, so before that we did not have such definitions and terms in the form in which they are now being laid down, as such. we clearly indicate the russian federation and china, while today, by the way, there are quite a lot of ratifications of various agreements on various directions, as the economic sphere of education, everything that is needed today, as

they say, here and now for uh, the movement forward of the economy and social uh concept changes by 70%. from an economic point of view. here. well, what will change? yes, i really don't really understand, because yes, perhaps we will have some clichés hung. they are friendly countries there. perhaps there will be some peculiarities in relations with these countries, but by and large, nothing will change here. first to dishonor the brand series is not why question, it was said that journalists do not attend conferences. and here is my experience of communicating with journalists. unfortunately , it shows that not all of them, but most of them are extremely ignorant. in the economic sphere, therefore , this teacher should also, as it were, in the concept of national security. and my question was not about journalists. e journalists, just do not suffer from a lack of information profession. we have her like that. if anything, e extract. i'm talking about people because we, uh, here's the head of state, when

the question was about the concept, he talked about that please swipe a in wide format. why is there time for when we said we need a proposal, you understand, we will put it later, but we live only the lazy did not come. will it be so with the concept, is it necessary so in the end? true, but probably not, look. we look, we are going in such a very interesting way, we are talking about the fact that the concept of national security is a document that affects all aspects of life, the concept of national security is the second most important document after the constitution, but at the same time we say you know, let it remain on the opinion of the experts. no, not according to experts. i'll say it differently. it was said that there are 50 indicators that are systematically described in the concept. well, excuse me, yes, more than 50 a little bit, that is, more than 50 of them to understand, well , in order to understand, you need to specifically

deal with this natural circle of knowledge. i think that, by the way, journalists should be doing this now. and in the sense including, for example, on a round table. having come to us to listen, and after that already to convey now about the question that you actually asked, that is, what is said about this economic component, again. there are even considered a large number of indicators. not all of them are in the open. and on this issue, well, as if some secrecy is observed on the other hand, it really talks about the number of individuals in society, the state, on the other hand, any economist understands that in order for, when an enterprise is effective, there must be an owner owners there are two types of enterprises , state and family. which joint-stock companies are not owners. well, a person holds shares and is not an enterprise. we do not care what will happen to the enterprises, and therefore we have the opportunity to feel what is happening on

the basis of indicators and evaluate the candidate. or how to add very well. they said that a person is a society by a state, but at the end of national security it is said about the balance of interests. this is a key point, by the way, this balance can change depending on the external situation and move in the right direction. the balance of interests is fundamental moment, which is important for this document alexander mikhailovich, you probably, as a person working in the executive branch on earth. i understand that you are guided by both expert opinion and indicator data. but very often you guide the decisions that come to you. well, as it says from the ground, it’s different for sure and your subordinates. and you're running telephone lines. communicate with people. after all, there, just the same, questions and problems are heard that are very good. this concept includes somewhere unfinished, the road

screwed up somewhere. fence. somewhere someone said thank you. and look, in 1920, one such comrade appeared who, as the president says, these are small, they don’t exist, but he uses and tried to become president. this is a folk theme. after all, this is the concept of national security, when trouble on earth becomes the cause of political changes. i understand that the grandson of a scientist experts can say there are rapper points and indicators, but you have something a little different. we have to work, but we understand that the concept is political documentation. and here, and in what a question the question consists in how to be guided to you? still, people listen, or an indicator, but i think this is a conceptual issue. you asked, i think, after all, the concept is a strategic vision. this is when it is enlarged, but anyway, you yourself answered her that even the road is included in

the same condition. only this, as it were, is already a smaller tactical task, therefore they are all these tasks that people raise, for example, they are for the appeal of citizens who challenge any industry on earth, they and ruet all these risks and threats, which are then formed into a single concept, which we described in our own way. it's just that people look like this. it is not necessary for the people to know about the concept , it is necessary in order for legal definitions and you can bring any statement that was any action under this concept. and by the way, if you have violated these standards, then you'd better get into another one, if the sixty-first article of the criminal code is a threat to national security, but you have normatively formulated things. you you can compare the same statements that were in those wise men, which , as you say, did, and then you can give a legal assessment that is not subjective,

as for these indicators, they are a guideline so that you can structure. actually, where you are, then it turns out that the previous concept did not protect us from such minds, it just protected us in due time. note. at the expense of even pmcs, that is, this concept has worked. consider that 12 years and my main threats have been covered, and now new ones are being added, for example, here is the information sphere. it was very important for us. such a thing. we must be export oriented to enter. and now we are talking about the fact that we are not only export- oriented, but we also need to work on these achievements for a month and, as a result , our comrade took to the streets. well, well, first of all. it's getting harder, yeah, that's why it's not like that. just. i just want to say that in the process of change. here i participated in the social bloc that we had. over these 10 years , almost everything has changed tremendously for the better, but new things have also appeared. well first, the whole block. i’m talking about

pandemics, which means that all these viral diseases work near our border. they certainly show that the threat does not explode, so you need to enter it to raise it. it was actually in the environmental sphere, but now it is being raised and given priority and essentially a concept. it allows you to set priorities in the sectors that exist. i would like to emphasize once again that every movement is systemic and we can evaluate it. so you said what you did. look back and forth, and again the most important element that allows us to structure our understanding of those processes of information events. that's one of the reasons why we decided to, yes, to make changes is that we made a certain decision to say, yes, uh, change the constitution accordingly. we talked about the redistribution of powers, everything is slowly changing. here, alexander mikhailovich will also probably have more powers, but we constantly have a new challenge and

there are we tried, let's say, to look at the concept of information security in the nineteenth year, and it covers all areas. and so the next step , again, just the question on this topic , there is the issue of information security in the context of conducting information-psychological wars. how to protect people? how to train information front fighters? well, you are not us, it is the people who write. i'm talking vulgarly, another very important aspect for the national interest. still. we spoke here about threats and risks, and everything must be understood that the concept draws attention to national interests, and i think. this is a very important element to which to say will determine and the importance of well. and tell me. here you say the word national, we say nationally, but first of all we declare that we live in an alliance with russia. here is how it correlates with the russian concept or strategy of the national reserve. well, we can also

be somewhere there. we often talk with us and there are skandars. we understand that these iskanders are our security, but we are a sovereign state. well, no one argued, not only there is, for example, a concert with the strategy of belarus russia there is also the union of the state and there these questions are supreme and are in contact e i also wanted to use the indicators indicator for what in general it is to evaluate constantly with security in certain areas so that the decision maker knows what decisions ordinary people do not need to accept this, in principle they should know, they should know. here's what we've been saying, what threats are risks. and if possible, reception, he will perform. body power is nothing to worry about, followed by a spoon will leave you i'll throw here our good barrel of honey. i got acquainted with the draft concept at work here is the document. i overcame, read, comprehended and the first phrase that i uttered is very difficult to perceive. e. i am a moderately

educated person. uh, somehow touching the national security faith. and i had to go back to some moments to re-read to understand to go deeper. if we want society to understand its place , the role of the carelessness system, in my opinion. we need to simplify a little. we have time before approval. here, but this is mine. maybe about subjectivity, i agree. moreover, the president indirectly said this when he said that the document should be open, for sure. it's been said. not just like that. here, look at the open document, whoever wants, he lets. no, you must understand. that's what i'm talking about trying to say what people are trying to understand what is the concept of national security? what is it eaten with? what they are afraid of heard an understandable phrase, people's militia and communications. it's with this and more they don't look at the economy or the biology, or ecology, unfortunately, or

fortunately, i don't know anymore, well, how to convince people that this is necessary and somehow it is necessary. well, how to use it somehow, because you know. sometimes journalists, they say, send a person to the shooting. he leaves to shoot, for example, strategic food supplies for him, he says, you understand, this is embedded in the concept of national security. he says, why a, because we must have some certain amount of food, just in case, right right, but not everyone knows this, right. how to explain it, how it should be in a simple language , the show conveyed that they don’t even know that it is necessary to lay money on this and speech. and in principle, well, we are talking about the fact that in our country it is virologists political scientists who give me now military analysts, depending on something. we need to give at least some excuse for this word, but a semi-finished product, because the product that we have today is

a working concept in 2010. but what is served, so as if it has already been categorically accepted. no, some standards. there are some experts, but people do not need it. there are points that are obeyed. yes, dear comrades. after this document is accepted. it will be obligatory for execution now there is this discussion. and so it will be presented to the people can make changes. so, as for the fact that the language is completely simple and understandable to everyone, you also know the scope of such a document is legally significant. you studied at the academy of management. you know that in order to write an order of the order and pass the law regulations, it must have an unambiguous interpretation. why do we have such an idea that the language is oak, because legal documents presuppose an unambiguous interpretation of it and therefore it is unusual for our veneration - this is one of

the moments, but there is another point, of course, art is short and clear. well, look at napoleon's civil code. he wrote the father of a child born in a marriage is considered a husband 100 years past removed from the state responsibility for all these things, as clearly stated. this is also a big job needs to be done in order to articulate what we are talking about, which is understandable to the expert community. this is understandable to educated people. this is clear to lawyers. why then do we complicate our own life and make it open for us, i really explained the thing. yes, a request for a national security concept. we really live in a rather dangerous world, we read the news, where bombs are exploding abroad, 300 km from us. we really read about how the laboratory infected us with some kind of incomprehensible disease, and we

at least psychologically we need protection in the protection of whom the state kirill is here, pay attention, you have already shown the sign that the whole institute prepared, but it's just that our people's safety is one of the first places, and it is provided with green color. this, by the way, is the most important element of the stability of the state, the choice was said in a pyramid, that down there lies the first level to have something at all, and the second is safe, of course, therefore the key factor in which the society lives is examined by the society. it is, of course, unstable. so, therefore, the people, wanting security, demand to understand how to achieve it. well, well, she said let's turn. to the concept of the concept, what does national security say is the state of protection of national interests from internal external threats? just simple, and then we turn on the national environmental economic theoretical is the external threat risks. there's more and

more. further, like this. why load up an ordinary person with this and you can load it when you cross the street. you must know traffic laws. we live in a society where things change very quickly. and, by the way, speaking the person himself should be oriented to a certain extent. here is the question that was asked. how it works with people, how to explain to them what you are watching 2 years have passed. we have created a powerful information group. with completely different. we didn’t have this in the twentieth year. i agree that this was a problem, which, of course, was burned in the twentieth year. the people themselves appeared in our country in a number of ways. i would say talented journalists. all this is difficult. after all. it's not just to create this system, and? well, we are fighting not only with ourselves and the internal enemy is working against us. you can list here who works in almost the entire western world, they are technologically provided and therefore people should know that we live in peace in the world

and see it as a whole, not separately fragmentarily, but as a whole, and then it seems to me that when he himself collides, when not will be nearby, mom's dad and the government agency, he will make the decision himself and will make it consciously. well, probably not relying on concept of national security. when you arrive, you will immediately remember everything. i tell you this for sure, that is, when we have spoken, read, done, it goes away, but as soon as in real life you have problems. well, memory has such properties. well it pops up. sorry to interrupt , but the message was the right person, society and state. it is subjective and unconditional. this concept is based on the fact that the state protects both the individual and society , and therefore itself. it just brings us to the idea of ​​the need to define national interest, national interest, and it says, uh, and in general, here is a new draft of the concept of national security, it

is aimed at ensuring the existing stability and subsequently improving the quality of life of citizens. you see, protecting, identifying threats to leave everything as it is and make it even better for sustainable development - this is the wording. uh, sustainable development, that is, adjustment requests. yes yes it is, because sustainable development. if what i am in 660 the term here is saving take environmentally, an imperative. unfortunately i do too previous option. here are the concepts that turned out to be read, as the expert sent me, and you sometimes understand sustainable economic growth by sustainable development - these are different things or what else social economic sustainable development is completely different things, like a braid on a river braid for girls. i've already speak i'm sorry, i'll express it here. apparently for what we are going, for what we are doing all this , there is an understanding. it has already been said the concept of national security,

the need for basic competencies at the level of formation of the concept of language should be relatively complex, but in order to convey to the population this is a matter of information security and ideology. people should know that the state cares about them. but this is the task of journalists and talk shows, this is the task of quoting such people as i spoke about, yes, but again, the secretary of state. he talked about the fact that the main changes in concepts in the conceptual apparatus. for example, the concept of national security is supplemented by such a fundamental thesis as the state of protection of national interests for the sustainable development of society, that is formula again on this subject of remarks, that is, because one and the same terms cannot be used to raise completely different things occupied by others. if yes, sustainable social economic development. i wrote in the previous version, this remark is his task. what a talk show that captains lower these levels to the level of those people who have practically no basic competencies. well, excuse me, this is the task

of journalists. we talked in order to simplify this concept to a certain extent. everything must be properly explained. because it’s not necessary at all, as it were, that they don’t understand anything at all, but we simplify no, to offend a little. i wanted to say that our society is quite literate . moreover, i want to say after the twentieth year , almost everyone in whatever group he was rethinking what happened. so there is a separate result of this case. i don’t want to talk about them now, but i’ll explain again. here, quite rightly, they told the person of the society of the state the balance, taking into account the situation that exists and how this balance assess the state of andrey ivanovich we will achieve this balance. how do you think? and we will achieve a balance, uh, but when i criticized the concept a little, i least of all had in mind, uh, terminology. eh, quite a complex design. in my opinion.

this is what i wanted to say so that people can get better acquainted, because to get acquainted with the concepts of the strategies of other states, so that it is built differently, that is, this simplification is necessary for perception, so as not to jump around the entire text, looking for political information there, etc. other. well, we have time to correct this, if there is a need for this discussion of experts. there are still, of course, they will sort it out, and yet, to your question about what to do in the cis, yes. why? can belarusians have national interests? i would like to address saturday, when the president gave an interview to journalists and the issue of belarus has its own national interests. the russian federation has a question, again, the balance of these interests. and the common common interests they are also present are just those compromises when the state is in international relations. uh, making some contracts. they are, so to speak, ready for these compromises, so clear wording. we have our own

national interests. and we must perfectly understand what is behind each of these capacious words, but at the same time , read such a little advice between the lines. well, the concept of national security, as it turns out, is the second most important document. after the constitution, for sure, there will indeed be a large number of lawyers, and experts who will quote and most importantly tell you. and you probably only understand one thing, that when you protect your family. this is also the concept of national security, the family, this is the main thing.