he is an ensemble. thank you review prepared by svetlana chernova study the history of ancestors and touch the past the national historical archive gives every belarusian an opportunity to find out his family tree where to go for this, how to independently conduct genealogical research. let's ask yevgeny glinsky, deputy head of the research and publication department of the national historical archive. belarus hello evgeniy, how popular is this service today among belarusians. let's just say he uses has been very popular for over 30 years, in fact, our demand has not fallen. and even some years grows. that is, it is in demand among belarusians, and not only belarusians in services. well, on average, how many belarusians turn to you per year per month on average, we can accept about 100 requests , that is, we will limit them more, only physically we cannot make more archives, but people themselves can count the archives and engage in the searches themselves their

ancestors their pedigree is also available on the same sign up to write a statement to describe. search region and so on you will be helped in the reading room. well, if you don’t have time, you don’t have the desire, there’s no way, then you can make a request, you need to understand that you can simply not fall into this limit, and you analyzed who most often applies for such a service, who is interested, the pedigree is the widest layer of the population. that is, we cannot say that, for example, there are residents of cities and people with a certain educational center live there or trees. neither are women and men. this is where families often come in. now even not such families clan clans, that is, gathering, for example, there cousins ​​cousins. and those second cousins ​​gather, they look for them together, and common ancestors or they come there, for example, families of people write not only themselves into the thyroid hall, but for their father, for example, or their brother or their wife. that is, this is now the case. such a family hobby, and let's say, and we decided, perhaps, that you in these countries had quite developed migration

at different times. how deeply can you study your family, to what knee? well, this is the knee. question is difficult. because someone there gives birth to children of 25 years. so there were all times and in the fifties and in 60 years they gave birth. well , it’s very good if the peasant genealogy on the territory of belarus yes of the xviii century to the beginning of the xviii century. it is quite possible that dick literally, even the seventeenth century, is the sixteenth, for example, in some regions the floor of pishchin. the documents are well preserved. send before the sixteenth century. it can be earlier, that is, imagine, there is the time of the flat principality of the time of the prince, mindovg, there is no such thing. if someone says that the excavation of ancestral genealogy, yes, and there is the thirteenth century, who is likely to exaggerate a little. these are rather some houses with a guess, but, unfortunately, such a fundamental document circulation began there in the 16-17th century for shlyakh you, and in the eighteenth-de-19th century for christians, that is, well, again for different territories very good. we will introduce central and belarus, this is poverty. uh, west breschen,

west east, breschen. the west of the gomel region is also part of the modern vitebsk region, most of the modern mogilev region especially its east, south-east of the vitebsk region, documents are very poorly preserved. they died primarily in the second world war , the great patriotic war, and in the first world war, the accrued damage was inflicted. that is, it is very difficult to find there, that is, it also depends on the region, therefore, when contacting the archive , we write in an information letter that if there are no documents in your territory, then what is not encouraging. in vain, when you are asked for this service. they say why they need to own this information, where, in principle, can this information to use in the future, as a rule. it is purely like this and explore, the interests of love curiosity. absolutely right , people often search just for curiosity. then they can move on to another level, some publish books or add to their personal internet sites. yes, even describe the search, there are such special sites where

a person. to describe your search help others create such as instruction manuals. how to search for yourself or how to deal with the same archival references, how to understand them? what information can be get also often it goes to the level of local history. that is, for example, there is to explore first his family, then he became interested in neighbors or distant relatives there, then an entire village or cities, or there with the forest council. that is, it is very, uh, promising, in principle , the direction, because through the history of the family. we learn, including the history and history of belarus, the history of our country, the history of the small motherland, including many villages of the village council of the district, towns, shtetls, and so on. thank you very much for your questions the program was answered by yevgeny glinsky , deputy head of the department of scientific research and publication activities of the national historical archive of belarus, summarizing and analyzing the main events of this week in the informational analytical program. the main broadcast is all

the projects of our body. there are three channels on the website www.24.by, as well as social networks. i'm sorry to you. all the best. in essence, today we will talk about

the concept of national security together with our experts, but i remind you that everyone of you can join the discussion. there is a qr code at the bottom of the screen. here is your smartphone with you, as usual kirill kazakov and alyona serova look in november 2010 , the current concept of national security was signed. well , as a matter of fact, it seems to me that the situation has changed a little bit in this case, i'm already even trying to be rude. here, look, in 2010 such statements could have followed, which we heard yesterday according to the competent committee saying that there were no skirmishes on the ukrainian border. which shooting on the ukrainian border in 2010 in 2010 we didn’t know anything about , for example, covid-19 we really thought that we were trying to build some kind of independent

state, while being equally friends with both the west and the east in 2010. this is basically, well, if you rewind 13 years ago like this, it seems to me that a little time has passed from the point of view of history, but from the point of view of the changes that have taken place, a huge period indeed. we live in our time, which takes place in ukraine, we live during tectonic geopolitical changes. and at this time. we really need to change somehow our concept of national security, because the world has changed plus everything, and a year ago we adopted a new constitution in a referendum there, the people's constitution for a long time. it was discussed and those items that we really need were chosen. a year has passed and our civil society is changing. the party political system is changing, all this must be taken into account, including in the concept of national security again, of course, that and this concept of national security , in general, will already be adopted according to

our new general rules, that is, this will be approved by the belarusian people's assembly and the president last week. speaking of which, i said to this concept that we will not hide it, like so many states. we will talk about it openly. and here, in fact, this program is here through these those conversations, when we can discuss and perhaps recall that the concept of national security. it's not just about weapons. uh huh this is about economics this is also about uh ecology. this is generally, in fact, about everything that is. here, look, he is the concept of national security from the point of view of national security. it is clear we are talking here about the fact that we are defending the country, for example, we are harvesting. and we store a certain amount, that is, we are, in fact, preparing for some kind of emergency somewhere, but from the point of view of the region. look, in 2010 there was no fence from latvia. the corpses from latvia were not

thrown to us. somehow, even such black news, and will not affect how the concept of national security will change regional politics. you know, but i don't think that at the regional level something will change conceptually. after all, each region is an integral part of our wonderful motherland. that is why we are discussing the draft of this concept. it is, of course, broadcast to every region. maybe each region has its own characteristics, but all the same , weapons were rightly said at the core, and the economy, social approaches, food security, therefore , this year a biological security section is a social thing, therefore. eh, it’s like a set of such tools, a set of requirements that we must present to ourselves so that we live happily for a long time, and everyone envy us,

so after all, the concept at the regional level is just a way of how to proceed further in order to move progressively forward. look , continue. yes, this is an idea about comparing 2010 with these realities in which we find ourselves today. but i know alexander mikhailovich that you had a hand in the fragment that concerns biological safety. i just even now i thought that, probably for very many, 13 years ago. ah. well, biological weapons, biological security - it was something very distant, very incomprehensible. and so, when a few years ago, it turns out that a pandemic began, and remember, opinions were very divided then and studied theories that were called conspiracy theories. well, in general, perhaps, time will put everything in its place. so the moment associated with

biological safety, it was with the emphasis on this unit that it was caused by the pandemic. or you know something else, i will say that there is a blessing in disguise, so life suggested that this section should be and, of course, we are developing it, i then worked in the government. we decided to focus on disease prevention, at a minimum, and forecasting what is happening at the distant frontiers and approaching our approaches, so that, speaking in military language, we can dig trenches in advance, but when we got together and began to break down to the concept, it turned out that it is much more versatile. that is, there must were to enter e not only diseases, and what is connected with the disease and but tribal business, that is , it turns out that we have almost the entire village. we imported all breeding material almost from abroad. it's uh, creating a gmo organism. working with him is the creation of databases of genetically gifted people, and elite animal seeds, and so on. these are even species that come to

us from abroad and then break our ecosystems. this is bo sosnovskaya, for example, which is terribly dangerous for humans. uh, several types of beetle plants from the past, but again there, yes, but it turned out to be concept. it does not just apply to medicine and veterinary medicine, everything here is the ministry of environmental protection. here the academy of sciences is very closely connected. that is, it is also such a prominent biological safety organism, and we had to work out all these areas too. and as you can see, it's all organically, woven into the overall national system, they began with a scientific one. yes, and finished. as you say, and seeds and breeding farm. well, this is all that we have now lost, thanks to the males. yes, and now in fact it is better in fact that they started to work, ostensibly in order to preserve the best, and now it turns out that this is the only one. yes, but i emphasized that all the same, diseases still remain ahead of us, because we

see what is happening in the world, we see these formed biological laboratories. friends in quotation marks, which we see tightly around the perimeter, new diseases arise. we see constantly mutating and not giving all the best in one, but evolutionary theory. e in virology is versus sars. covid-19, so i think we are on the right track, that we are preparing, we are watching, we are predicting, and we are already trying to do something ourselves, here are the sanctions. yes, they believed that belarus had not been a party for several years in its sovereign history. and probably their former concept. i think that the new concept will also have such a great emphasis on our economic security. here's how we will implement it sergeevich tell me thank you, well. in my opinion, the economy has now become radically different. i generally defined

it as the economics of risks, and this concept was formed in the eighteenth year. it was published in the eighteenth. that is, i did not come up with the essence of it now , which is that we, in principle, cannot predict what will happen in a year or two. well, the years have shown that this is the way we say the concept of risk economics. we discussed at the round table at the belarusian national technical university we had a round table with representatives of the secretary of state. this security council sideline participated in those present here on the merits. i think on the one hand. here is the concept national security needs to look at things a little differently, for example. and why not include it. following the example of the federal republic of germany, such a concept as a steady shortage of proposals. exactly like this when it's steady, you can't, well, with what kind of deficit is the shortage? why was it not a proposal that you do not have some kind of resource, we see today that not everything can be bought for money. china doesn't sell everything. well,

a year ago, the flows blow up. well, the northern streams blow up. this is even easier than when it suddenly turns out on the market that the car cannot buy a bunch of semiconductors. because of this, american factories. automobiles are closed even before the events of the beginning of the twenty -second year, they are closed both in the united states and in south korea, and so on . what it will give us, we will see threats. first, we will see that the stable identity in the sentence is threat optimization. that is, in economic terms, they will hit us all together with types of weapons, including information on individual enterprises. well, twenty-two. the twentieth year showed it. it's already a cap. i remember, that it was described 2 years ago, when , after this meeting, the states communicated, and with mr. valfovich, and then he said that we are laying in this, and the concept of national security, a certain margin of safety. well, how the concept of 2010 still says that we are changing it

. not because it lived there or or there, it somehow turned out to be ineffective. no, we are laying, a certain margin of safety. and how can this then correlate with the fact that everything changes every day, we cannot predict anything andrey ivanovich may not make sense, in principle, the concept of writing. why do we need it? i will comment on the question to me. the thing is that we get something completely different, that from the concept of economic security it ceases to be static, it is dynamic, we are constantly approaching it, we are constantly reaching it, the situation is changing. i must quickly give, only one or two examples, primarily on the tractor. it is known that the republic of belarus occupies more than half of the russian market, but in terms of trucks, according to the results of last year, china is approaching 50% of the russian market question. why didn't we fill this niche? well the question, i leave unanswered, ah well. can i now and where is the concept of national security here, we must understand

that china is bypassing us and somehow take steps to compete in china, it is not this problem that is bypassing us, but that we have that not all enterprises are ready dynamically, but the changing markets demand supply and, accordingly, precisely in terms of management of these enterprises management. if you want it turned out that many businesses are accustomed to living in very static environments. in principle, they are not ready for the fact that the situation may change. well, after all, yes, i will return to your opinion about why we need the concept of national security. here, uh, again, the secretary of state said that this document is the second most important after the constitution. well, you agree. this is true after the constitution, probably the second most important document. and i will return to the issue of twelve years, in fact, this is not 12 years. we will accept it. a year later on april 24 the concept was planned and developed

for not a year, but at least two years, that is, from the eighth year to the 24th, a rather long period. e in russia, e, the average term is 6 years. here they have a strategy in the savings basin was the ninth 15 21 years, and in poland for the last 22 years. we changed our security strategy six times, the same thing, uh, well, it depends, in principle, uh, like in russia, too, there was a concept at the beginning, then they made a strategy, that is, apparently from content, importance, significance, and so on. so here is the soil here this period from two up to six years and the strategy changes, because everything is going so dynamically. it is now. if there is this project. uh, we are in fact at the crossing at the crossing, they don’t change her, but we have to, because in a year. something else will happen, the dynamics that we have, yes, a year ago we did not know that something would change and be updated, that is, this poses a very difficult task for developers. eh, try to anticipate. uh, at least the medium term. how

will these threats develop in our country ? security and the fact that this concept has been working for 12-13 years already. this indicates the conscientious work of those developers of the working group that is working, because they were able to foresee, yes, yes, which we are still working on and relying on a fairly large amount of provision to the end. that is, i say it again, we note the conscientious work of that working group. we have a little research. well, we have an indicator. yes, please show me the data. yes, colleagues commissioned by the bbc at the end of last year, the institute of sociology over belarus conducted a republican telephone survey on the concept we have without a pass. here , in principle, all the areas, uh, that are included in the new concept are represented here. this is how society assesses how secure our security is in these areas, how much it is not, that is, people are confident that we are in a very good state with protection in the field

of political security, military environmental social, but look at the problems of economic security. uh, demographic, well technology technical technological actually. yes, it's a small typo. i mean, that's what needs to be worked on. and now this is the starting point, including for discussing the document. here, the public, which will probably be for a whole year, almost 10 less, there will also be proposals and most likely , of course, there will be, of course, i don’t know, maybe later in the final version of the document it will be interesting to see the fact that there will be it, in principle. this is to be accepted again, i say, it is all the belarusian national assembly, uh, delegates, which we also have yet to define and choose. yes, see here the scientific and technical technical yes, we are in last place. i, too, am now listening to a conversation about the fact that we may not have enough semiconductors. or, perhaps, something else is not enough even today, for example, the published lists of those smartphones hear

$ 300, which is possible or impossible, and to import or export in belarus in belarus, that is, the europeans recommend that we buy a refrigerator there for some amount and will not be brought here. refrigerator, cost above 750 dollars, and accuses the russians of bringing microwaves and washing machines with ukraine for the sake of semiconductors. after all, this is just the last point , because, well, we do not hide the fact that we have a salty iphone and well, there is no belarusian phone, unfortunately, that we can counter even this statement with this. well, actually i would start. there is a well-known expression of the classics that practice without theory is blind, while theory without practice is dead, and yet it must be emphasized. uh, the concept is like u important a theoretical document that allows you to build some practical steps and that allow you to build some kind of political line and strategy tactics, and in this regard , a new version of the concept, which is already

being discussed and we are now present, at the same time. uh, this is, in general, a step forward in theory, first of all, and we must note that scientific and technological security, of course, worries many in this regard as well. uh, the belarusian national technical university, uh, offers and to say that these proposals have resulted in concrete ones. eh, so to say, e appeal and issue on the science of these technologies to the academy of behavior and the term and concept as innovation. security, well, what is innovation security is an issue related to innovative development. and this proposal is that security through development. and so to speak , in this regard, we can say that in any form of e-security, an innovative component is present and we need it in the military. so to speak, modern weapons and demographics, because in order to provide, as well

population squeezable population and growth. uh, so to speak, the demographic needs to be provided from the very beginning, uh. uh, increasing the birth rate, that is, the survival rate of children. this is necessary, the quests need medicines in order to treat effective quickly, and the pyramid is provided for everyone, then themselves and the children will be. you understand the questions. this is connected not only with the pure economy, but we see that in politics the innovation thing is widely used on you. this is the introduction of the achievements of scientific and technological progress in life, namely the introduction is not just something new and when we are talking about the knowledge society, which again is associated with all kinds of security we mean that it must be a stream must be a constant investment. getting the result further, i may not be such a popular thing, i will say, but many people get the feeling that this is hmm our science-intensive production that

exists in the country. yes, it still does not fully reflect the modern reality that is happening in the world. well, we are missing something yes, even look here. i am from the world of science fiction artificial intelligence. here you can now laugh at these two letters and and, but in essence. this is the same thing that in a year or two may somehow have an impact on our security. if now there are some applications or programs that can write texts, including these texts, can become bills. and these bills can then be adopted by people. and we are talking about the fact that yes, we can make innovations here, and in principle, and we are talking about the fact that we have some kind of machine there. perhaps there is some there. machine perhaps there is some kind of computer, but here we are somewhere beyond the realm of science fiction thinking, and that is why we are told that you are a little retrograde. so we did not drown in this retrograde. of course not.

well, firstly, we are an average european state in order for the market to bring super profits, well, scientists believe that at least 200 million people are needed, yes, then the market begins to work out, but say we are lucky our neighbors and say the great china that are not far and uh, the russian federation uh, such, so to speak resources such a market possess and it seems to me that we still need to return to the theory. why the concept? this means that we are laying down some fundamental principles that will allow the entire national economic complex to participate in development and ensure security . the strategy is to say this after politics, then tactics, and so on. today at the head of state, and discussed funding. yes , here is the purchase of weapons, and i somehow remembered. eh, when? well, maybe in the spring

i could be wrong, but it seems that it was also in the spring meeting of the president, then the power bloc gathered and talked about the rearmament of the belarusian army. and hmm, how we, in principle, build our defense, and then he said that it turned out that something that we focused on in theory a few years ago. here in practice, which, unfortunately, we see right here at our borders. well , it's not very efficient and it doesn't work very well, so what do we do? fingers speak journalistic language need to be flipped so that's how much we can be sure that those alexander vladimirovich's principles , which we are now laying in this new concept , will not turn out to be outdated, and we will accept it in the twenty-fourth, and in the twenty-fifth , artificial intelligence from the realm of fantasy will not have to change it. i would like to finish the concept of this guide to action. this is a guide that allows you

to form a policy, then this is already an action. well, for example, military strategy. they called their strategy frontier strategy. so, that is, this is already the implementation of those principles, which are included in the concept. thank you very much. well, i'm lucky. i participated in the development of the concept back then at the academy of science, and then it took place, yes, further, well , this kind of training also participated in updating this concept. i generally want to disagree with a few words. the fact that the concept is generally built differently. it structures this model of our national security; it structures the space into spheres and regions. here you said religion prodynamics. it exists in all spheres, both in political, economic and environmental and what has changed? well, firstly, i would say that new components have appeared, about which you spoke the most powerful, which is based on approaches to damage

our national security. that is , what level of damage inflicted in a particular area to do, in addition, i want to say that the concept itself was very well formulated. by the way, i want to draw your attention to the fact that in other states, that there is practically no such representation, because we have a whole system of indicators, and he political social economic and so on and so forth, but the dynamics with the help of quantitative assessments, how does it change? and of course, there are new things. the same information sphere. i want to say that already in the tenth year there were the makings of what appeared now, but of course, the extraordinary development of what was and therefore new components are appearing, for example, in the information sphere. another feature that i would like to note is that almost every component can manifest itself in several areas. especially this showed the events of the twentieth year, when people made one goal of the statement of action, and

they manifested themselves both in the political and in the economic and in the social sphere and in the military sphere, because she, well, it’s even known on the game in the stock exchange. yes, when a political statement brings down the action like that, well , as it were in this case, everything is clear that it's all interconnected. well, i’m talking about this and saying that the concept itself is built as a system tool, as a system. uh, it means the areas of activity in which there are indicators there are somewhere over 60, which are monitored and according to the state of these indicators, the approximation of the stability of the instability to the states is determined. and here the border of legal tolerance is determined, that is, people go beyond these limits and inflict. they damage the economy or not, that is, essentially. if we take the theory of management. this is a boundary of stability, which is impossible when we tell our partners and opponents about what places are needed e. what places do you need to press in order to

directly destroy this stability of ours, well firstly, why are we doing this practice has shown that our stability is not so easy to destroy, that's why. uh, as you said about artificial intelligence. we have problems in a number of cases naturally. i would like to turn. i would like to draw attention to something else, that is, when we talk about this thing, we must testify to the first saturation of computer technology. the second is support for decisions being made and only the next stage, when it will go automatically automatically, this is done in the case when there is no time left. and in general all concept. it seems to emphasize the dynamics of the development of society, that is, the reduction of the time allotted for reaction and , roughly speaking, preparation, so that, as it was rightly noted, and not to be as smart as my wife after that, so that we can observe in advance and be able to predict the development of the situation. you see, and for this you need to structure and track. and tell me, who is this council of wise men, who follows all this

, studies all these fluctuations and somehow tightens it up. in which direction should the concept change every two or three years, then i i want to say that as in any country. we have created relevant institutions that are responsible for activities in their respective areas, and well, today’s meeting the head of state invited the main yes to the security sector, but i want to say that this work of a large number of people and analysts and those who clean up information and structure problems lies in in order not to release any information, not to miss important events, therefore there is monitoring short-term medium-term monthly there annual and so further. look at us, and in the chat they wrote that a, therefore, appeared in such a way that the erosion of the national cultural identity of the belarusian diaspora was attributed to the source of threats. the use of belarusians, foreign countries for destructive purposes to put pressure on belarus this is a new

trend after the twentieth year and how dangerous. and i would from myself more. well, who here among you can already answer to determine for yourself, and i would also add, such a question. uh, now, if this is a new trend after this father, if this is so, then why are we not provided, we are talking about sovereignty, and the belarusian statehood is a trend observed. approximately 500 years, what the poles are talking about, and this is the cultural balba for the capture of political values. eh, it manifests itself over time with varying intensity, sometimes less. well, actually look as a result, after all, we have become an independent state. therefore, spiritual values, so for the russians, are normative, incorporated in the documents. we have traditional values ​​about them. here , it is precisely the belarusian abroad that is trying seize power from us. but i’ll just give an example, maybe the last choice is also absolutely different for our abroad.

come on, look, see the last elections in may sandu moldova , and so, when they conducted a study, who voted for her, then for the most part anna of the president of moldova, who is a citizen of romania and talks about nato, will be confused. the course of this state for it, for the most part, was voted abroad by those people who left back. and if those who live in moldova voted, then if there is a real situation of the country in which she will rule, then she would not win. this is just one of the examples of how foreign countries can influence the internal situation without saving. side state. alena can answer two questions. as you asked , the first one went unanswered, why is it open? because the idea that takes hold of the masses is invincible and the president is perfectly wise. i determined that this should be a general discussion and during this year there were many conferences, many seminars. and now we are already on television. i did not see,

who might be in your headphones actually. yes, we are very very in vain sometimes talking about what we have fenced off with seminars and conferences. here is just a discussion from you. that is, we discussed and seemed to have heard everything, not always so, true. that is why we pull such topics for discussion on talk shows, because we are trying to chew it up in human ordinary language. look, we 've been talking about the concept of national security for half an hour. believe me most of the viewers who sat down to watch program, we were sure that this is the right of the military, a military man also carries with us. there follows a short answer. so , article 107 is determined by the constitution of the republic of belarus - this is the council of ministers. well , look, firstly, only one military man. secondly, we have not yet talked about the military . oleg olegovich, here is the concept of national security, firstly, as a teacher, and

how much will it change or are you already trying to change. eh, some postulates of this particular concept, perhaps some. well, i don't know if there are timely changes. yes, in your training, uh, a cadet of the military academy, in particular, the faculty, he no longer wants, and the second we meet last week also talked. here is the simplest question that again the president raises the question of the people's militia when he was talking about the concept of national security. uh-huh, that is, for the majority. these words are a synonym, for sure the situation is still the knb is equal to the people's militia. what is changing and what is the people's militia? here we are as people we are afraid of nothing or not to be afraid, does not even suspect and does not link these things. maybe i'll put the point here is about the conference seminars. you have not heard about the formation itself. yes, here is the concept of a security center by interdepartmental commissions, because a specialist works. and now here is a talk show and now there is a period when it is put on public display and

people. now they will hear and know about it. what can i say about the military component of the concept of security? yes, we see that since january 1, 2023, several dozen offensive exercises have been in in poland, the baltics, respectively, we have already discussed biological laboratories , which are practically near us and in other countries under the auspices of the united states. we see that in general, analyzing the us national security strategy, it says that they are the guarantor of world stability. uh, in case of a pandemic and any disease. yes , but they are recommended. they always have the character of causing damage, because our direction to which we went is completely different, uh, which the head of state chose, and we see that it is correct uh in the concept national security from the military sphere. uh, three are allocated on let's say. so uh direction. these are challenges, risks and threats. for what they uh in the case before that there was no such thing was this uh,

let's put it this way. e will help us to draw conclusions after the forty-first year. why? because here are three categories, and that is, we are looking so far beyond forty. the first year we have other loved ones closer. no, i just don’t understand, as an example, to understand why i took the forty -first year, because somewhere we were fully prepared for aggression now to be ready for aggression. we have structured, and the threats that may come from us, and the risks, challenges and threats - these are three components in terms of scale, thanks to which the state will be able to adequately respond and, in particular , the military bloc. well, somehow like this, well, the people's militia. yes, uh in case of martial law, it is clear, uh, what the armed forces will do. uh, the structures of the internal troops of the ministry of internal affairs will, uh, restore order within the state, and the civilians will be engaged in industry. that is, it is clear that someone

you will need the economy on in on a military footing. bet and so on, but in the case when the enemy is nearby, of course. eh, let's put it this way. this large number of men can voluntarily take up arms and defend their home, and i will correct you, and the minister of defense said that not only men, but also women, of course. yes, uh, feminism is also embedded in the concept of national security, like a fashionable threat, uh, three letters e. yes. that is, we used to have a different word for pmc trans. now everyone already knows this. uterus yes, uh, am i taken into account? is such a factor, as a threat from the pmcs in the knb and i will say more. here pmcs are mentioned here, even the military doctrine, in my opinion, is the sixteenth

year. uh, if you look at how the military, the doctrine, describes modern military conflicts by 95%, they foresaw the developers of what will happen now in ukraine, so pay attention, that is, this period of time , our armed forces were preparing for today's war, not to the past, but to the present. that is, this concept of a dude, we already have a hybrid in the documents of the past. story. she is in everything. yes, including pmcs, yes, we are talking about the fact that one way or another, any changes in the concept, well, affect society, from the point of view of, uh, such legislative activity, as in principle. this will affect your work and will affect whether all the members are called will affect unambiguously. and by the way, here we are today more than once, we talked about how people in general will perceive the concept, how exactly to me just as a person. it will matter, let's start with the most important thing, because

right away we say that security is it is the provision of the totality of all methods and views of the personality of society and the state. pay attention to the first place is the personality, which means, each of us is a society and offspring and, of course, the legislative process, it is a process for that, because it is not static and natural over time. pay attention here are all the directions that we talked about, yes, here is according to a sociological study that was and what is included in the concept in the project, by the way, speaking of the updated concept , almost any bill covers and aimed at ensuring national security. we can take whatever we want potholes on the road there, i'll tell you seriously, government devices, demographics , medicine, anything, everything that goes through the legislative process. this is one way or another aimed at ensuring national

security. moreover, what concerns the economy today is one of the most global issues. first, today we are talking about equal conditions from the state to public and private organizations. yes, that is, we are talking today at public private partnership, and we have been constantly in this particular one for several decades, but there are very important points, which, by the way, again. they are also included in the concept. here is the updated one. today we are talking about strategic allies and strategic partners, and this destroys us in the first place. let's immediately explain to those who have not read the current concept, so before that we did not have such definitions and terms in the form in which they are now being laid down, as such. we clearly indicate the russian at the same time, the federation and china today, by the way, there are quite a lot

of ratifications of various agreements in various areas, as the economic sphere of education, everything that is needed today, as they say, here and now for uh, moving forward the economy and social uh the concept changes by 70%. from an economic point of view. here. well, what will change? yes, i really don't really understand, because yes, perhaps we will have some clichés hung. they are friendly countries there. perhaps there will be some features relations with these countries, but by and large, nothing will change here. at first, the disgrace to the brand series is not why the issue was said that journalists do not attend conferences. and here is my experience of communicating with journalists. unfortunately , it shows that not all of them, but most of them are extremely ignorant. in the economic sphere, therefore , this should also be taken into account in the concept of national security. and my question was not about journalists. e journalists, just do not suffer from

a lack of information profession. we have such her. if anything, e extract. i'm talking about the people, because we, uh, here's the head of state, when the question was about the concept, he said that please, hold a in a wide format. why is there time for when we said we need a proposal, you understand, then we wait, well, you didn’t touch it, only the lazy didn’t come. will it be like this in the end and should it be like this in the end? true, but probably not, look. we look, we are going in such a very interesting way, we are talking about the fact that the concept of national security is such a document that affects all aspects of life, the concept of national security is the second most important document after the constitution, but at the same time, we say, you know, let it remain in the opinion of experts. no, not according to experts. i'll say it differently. it was said that there are 50 indicators that systematically

describe the concept. well, excuse me, but more than 50 a little bit, that is, more than 50 of them to understand. well , in order to understand, you need to specifically deal with this in a certain circle of knowledge. i believe that, by the way, now you are doing these journalists should. and in the sense including, for example, on a round table. having come to us to listen, and after that, to report now about the question that you actually asked, that is, what is being said about this economic component , again. there are even considered a large number of indicators. not all are not in the public domain. and so the question is, well, how would some secrecy be observed on the other hand, it really talks about the number of individuals in society, the state, on the other hand, any economist understands that for in order to save on an enterprise to be effective there must be owner owners there are two types of enterprises, state and family corner. joint stock companies are not

owners. well, a person holds shares and not an enterprise anyway fate, and therefore we have the opportunity to feel what is happening on the basis of indicators and evaluate the candidate. or, how to add , they said very well that a person is a society by a state, but the concept of national security speaks of a balance of interests. this is the key moment, by the way, this balance may , depending on the external situation, change to move in the right direction. the balance of interests is a fundamental point, which is important for this document alexander mikhailovich you probably, as a person working in the executive branch on earth. i understand that you are guided by both expert opinion and indicator data. but very often you guide the decisions that come to you. well, as it says from the ground, it’s different for sure and your subordinates. and you hold phones or not communicate with people, because there, just the same

, there are questions and problems that are very good. this concept includes somewhere unfinished, the road somewhere squinted. fence. somewhere someone said thank you. and look, in the twentieth year, one such comrade appeared who, like this, as the president says, finely, i don’t happen to be like that, but he uses and tried to become president. this is a folk theme. after all, this is the concept of national security, when trouble on earth becomes the cause of political changes. i understand that the grandson of scientists experts may say there are rapper points and indicators, but you have something a little different. you have to work, but we understand that the concept is political documents. and here, and in what a question the question consists in how to be guided to you? still, people listen, or an indicator, but i think this is a conceptual issue.

you asked, i think, after all, the concept is such a strategic vision, it is somehow enlarged, but anyway you yourself answered that even the road is included in this only this, as it were already the tactical task is smaller, so they are all these tasks that people raise, for example, they are for the appeal of citizens who challenge any industry on earth, they and ruet, these are all the risks and threats that are then formed into a single concept that we described in my own way. it's just that people don't seem to need to know about the concept. i don’t know in order not to say this, it is necessary in order to define this clear legal definition in your own way, and you can any statement that was any bring action under this concept. and by the way, if you have violated these standards, then you already fall into another or that the sixty-first article of the criminal code is a threat to national security, but you have normatively formulated things.

you can compare the same statements that were in those smart people who, as it were, made a story, and then you can give a legal assessment that is not subjective, as for these indicators, they are a guideline so that you can structure. actually, where are you? then it turns out that the previous concept did not protect us from such skills, just protected us in due time. note. at the expense of even pmcs, that is, this concept has worked. consider that 12 years and the main threats have covered me, and now new ones are being added, for example, in the information sphere. it was very important for us. such a thing. we must be export oriented to enter. and now we are talking about the fact that we are not only export-oriented, but we also need these achievements and created them for a month, and as a result, our comrade took to the streets. oh well, firstly. it's getting harder, yeah, that's why it's not like that. just. i just want to say that in the process of change. here i participated in the social bloc that we had. over these 10

years, almost everything has changed tremendously for the better, but new things have also appeared. well, first of all, a whole block. i’m talking about a related pandemic, which means that these all sorts of viral diseases work near our border. they certainly show that the threat does not blow up, so you need to lead it to raise it. she is actually in the environmental sphere. was, but now it is raised by the two largest give priority and essentially the concept. it allows you to prioritize all the sectors that exist. once again, i draw your attention to the fact that every movement is systemic and we can evaluate it. here you said something like that. what did you do? look here and there. and once again, the most important element that allows us to structure our understanding of those processes of information events is the concept of one. yes, one of the reasons why we decided, yes, to make a change is because we made a certain decision. they said, yes, to amend the constitution accordingly. we talked about

the redistribution of powers, everything is slowly changing. alexander mikhailovich’s powers will also probably increase. the constitution of the constitution, but we constantly have new challenges. we tried, let's say, to look at the concept at the information security council in the nineteenth year, and it covers all areas. and so the next step is again peresadovich. we just have a question on this topic. and that this issue of information security conditions of reference information and psychological warriors. how to protect people? how to train information front fighters? well, you are not us, it is the people who write. well i went, i say, a cyber-lawsuit. there are still very important aspects for national interests. still. we spoke here about threats and risks, but one must understand that the concept pays attention to national interests, and i think. this is a very important element to which to say will determine and the importance of well. and tell me. here you say the word national, we say national, but first of all we declare

about the fact that we live in an alliance with russia. here is how it correlates with the russian concept or strategy of the national reserve. well, we can also be somewhere. we often talk. we have iskanders. we understand that these iskanders are our security, but we are a sovereign state, but not only is there, for example, the concept of strategy, belarus and russia also have a union state. and there these questions are all-high and touching. oh, i also wanted indicators for the indicator, what is it for? to assess the state of us security in certain areas in order for decision makers to know what decisions to make it is not necessary for ordinary people, in principle to know, they should know. here is what they could, what threats, challenges, risks are. and if possible, then at the reception ispol. to the knowledge of the authorities go a spoon, let's go and throw a barrel of honey from our good one. uh, i've seen the draft concept at work. here's the document.

i overcame, read, comprehended and the first phrase that i uttered is very difficult to perceive. e. i am a moderately educated person. uh, somehow in contact with the national security faith. and i had to go back to some moments to re-read to understand to go deeper. if we want society to understand its place in the system of carelessness. in my opinion. we need to simplify a little. we have time before approval. here, but this is mine. can be about subjective themselves will agree. moreover, the president indirectly said about this when he said that the document should be open, for sure. it's been said. not just like that. here, look at the open document, whoever wants, he lets. no, for sure he should understand, and i'm talking about this. i'm trying to say that people are trying to understand, but what is the concept of national security? what is it eaten? what they are afraid of heard an understandable phrase, people's

militia and communication. this is with this and more they do not look at either the economy, or biology or ecology, unfortunately, or fortunately, i do n’t know, well, how to convince people that this is necessary and somehow it is necessary . well, how to use it somehow, because you know. sometimes journalists say you send person for filming. he leaves to shoot, for example, strategic food supplies for him, he says, you understand, this is embedded in the concept of national security. he says, why a, because we must have some certain amount of food, just in case, right , right, but not everyone knows this, right. how to explain it, how it should be in simple language. here talk shows do not even know the refrigerator is out of the question. and in principle, well, we are talking about the fact that in our country it is virologists, a political scientist , and now military analysts, depending on from what we see is something to give. we need

to give at least some excuse for this word, but a semi-finished product, because the product that we have today is a working concept in 2010. but what is being submitted, so it seems as if the question that there are some standards has already been categorically accepted. there are some experts, but people do not need it. there are points that are obeyed. yes, dear comrades. after this document is accepted. it will be obligatory for execution now there is this discussion. and so he will presented to the people can make changes. so, as for the fact that the language is completely simple and understandable to everyone, you also know the scope of such a document is legally significant. you studied at the academy of management. you know that in order to write an order of an order and pass the law of an order, it must have an unambiguous interpretation. why do we have such an idea

that the oak language, because legal documents require an unambiguous interpretation of it and therefore it is not familiar to our veneration, this is one of moments, but there is another point, of course, art is short and clear. well, look at napoleon's civil code. he wrote the father of a child born in a marriage is considered a husband 100 years past removed from the state responsibility for all these things, as clearly stated. this is also a lot of work that needs to be done in order to articulate what it is, of course, for the expert community. this is understandable to educated people. this is understandable by a lawyer. why then do we ourselves complicate our lives and make it open. we have a thing explained in fact. yes, a request for a national security concept. we really live in a rather dangerous world, we read the news, where bombs are exploding abroad, 300 km from

us. we really read about how the laboratory infected us with some kind of incomprehensible disease, and we at least psychologically need protection in the protection of whom the state kirill is here. please note that you have already shown the sign that the whole institute prepared, but it’s just that our people’s safety is one of the first places. and i know green secured. this, by the way, is the most important element of the stability of the state, the choice was said in a pyramid, that there is the first level at the bottom to have something at all, and the second is safe, of course, therefore the key factor in which the society lives and the examined society. it is, of course, unstable. so, therefore, the people, wanting security, demand to understand how to achieve it. well, well, here it is, how then let's say we turn. to the concept , the concept that national security says is the state of protection of national interests from internal external threats? just simple, and then we

turn on the national environmental economic theoretical is the external threat risks. there's more and more. further, like this. why load up an ordinary person with this and you can load it when you cross the street. you must know the rules of the road. we live in a society where things change very quickly. and, by the way, speaking the person himself should be oriented to a certain extent. here is the question that was asked. how to work with people, how to explain to them - to explain what look, it's been 2 years. we have created a powerful information group. with completely different. we didn’t have this in the twentieth year. i agree that this was a problem, which, of course, was burned in the twentieth year. the people themselves appeared in our country in a number of ways. i would say talented journalists. all this is difficult. after all. it's not just to create this system, and? well, we are fighting not only with ourselves and the internal enemy is working against us. can list who works

almost the entire western world, and are not technologically advanced, and therefore people should know that we live calmly in the world for me and see it as a whole, not separately fragmentarily, but as a whole , and then it seems to me that when he himself collides, when he is not around, dad, mom and government agency, he himself will make a decision and will accept it consciously. well, probably not based on the concept of national security. when you arrive, you will immediately remember everything. i tell you this for sure, that is, when we have spoken, read, done, it goes away, but as soon as in real life you have problems. well, memory has such properties. well it pops up. sorry, i'm interrupting, after all, the message was the right person to the society of the state. it is subjective and unconditional. this concept is based on the fact that the state protects both the individual and society , and therefore itself. the concept just brings us to the idea

of ​​the need to define the national interests of the national interest, and it says, uh, and in general, here is a new project of the concept of national security, it is aimed at ensuring the existing stability and subsequently improving the quality of life of citizens. you know, protecting, identifying threats to leave everything as it is. even better in social sustainability. this wording appeared, but sustainable development, that is , we used to have such a request, no, because there is sustainable development. it is a well-established term in economics to accept the environmental imperative. unfortunately. i am also the previous one. here are the concepts that turned out to be read, as the expert sent me and you sometimes understand sustainable development as sustainable economic growth - these are different things or something also social and economic sustainable development. these are completely different things, like a braid on a river and a braid on a girl. i have already started talking. i'm sorry. here, apparently,

for what we are going. why do we do all this exists with understanding. it has already been said the concept of national security, the need for basic competencies at the level of language concept formation should be relatively difficult, but in order to convey messages. this is a matter of information security and ideology. people should know that the state cares about them. this one the task is already journalists and talk shows. such uh, what i was talking about, yes, and again the secretary of state, he said that the main changes in concepts in the conceptual apparatus, for example, the concept of national security is supplemented by such a fundamental thesis as the state of protection of national interests for sustainable development society, that is, we will discuss the wording and again write comments on this matter, that is, because one and the same term cannot be used to raise completely different things of development buildings by others. if yes, sustainable social economic development. yes, i wrote this remark in the previous version of his

task. what a talk show that captains lower these levels to the level of those people who have practically no basic competencies. well, excuse me, this is the task of journalists. we got into a conversation in order to simplify this concept to a certain extent . well, everything, correctly , belarusians should not be explained at all, as it were, that they do not understand anything at all. i wanted to say that our society is quite literate more moreover, i want to say, after the twentieth year , almost everyone in whatever group he was rethinking what happened. so there is a separate result of this case. i don’t want to talk about them now, but i’ll explain again. that's quite right, the people said - society, the state balance , taking into account the situation that exists and how to evaluate this balance of the state andrey ivanovich , we will achieve this balance, what do you think? will we achieve balance? uh, but when i critiqued the concept a bit, i

least of all had in mind e terminology. eh, quite a complex design. in my opinion. this is what i wanted to say so that people can get better acquainted, because they get acquainted with the concepts of the strategies of other states. i started in a different way. that is, this simplification is necessary for perception, so as not to jump around the entire text, looking for information there, political, etc. , etc. well, we have time to correct this, if there is a need for this discussion, of course, this will be sorted out, and nevertheless, to your question regarding what do cis yes, why? can belarusians have national interests? i would like to address saturday, when the president gave interviews to journalists and the question of belarus has its own nationalities, the russian federation has a question, again, the balance of these interests. and the common common interests they are also present are just those compromises when the state is in international relations.

uh, making some contracts. they are, so to speak, ready for these compromises, so clear wording. we have our own national interests. and we should be fine understand what is behind each of these capacious words, but at the same time read such a little advice between the lines, well, the concept of national security, as it turns out, is the second most important document. after the constitution, for sure, it will indeed find an increasing number of lawyers and experts who will quote. and most importantly , tell you. and you probably only understand one thing, that when you protect your family. this is also the concept of national security, the family, this is the main thing. the state

visit of the president of belarus to china betrayed a new impetus to bilateral partnership and filled with practical content the new highest level of belarusian chinese relations this morning alexander lukashenko held a series of meetings with the leadership of large chinese business. thus, belarus is proud of its cooperation with one of the most powerful companies in the world, the city group corporation. the total investment in construction with their participation in our country is $1.5 billion. work, firstly, on the construction of a mining and processing plant in belarus, and also to continue the construction. juha si did not assure those objects of the bnbk that the corporation will and is worthy to implement the agreements reached at the highest level.

we are really proud that we managed to drag you to belarus and you are working in belarus we hope very much we hope after this visit and negotiations with the top leaders of the country, including in our good friend seats, that our cooperation will only expand and we will not have none problems in the future, with the development of new projects, especially in terms of creating the construction of your company's belarusian facilities on the territory of belarus , we are working with china on these projects. we want to show that e cooperation. and china it's not just trade and exchange of goods, it 's the creation of high-tech companies and corporations with the participation of chinese partners in belarus, interested in the development of car building, the prospects

for cooperation were discussed at a meeting with the leadership of the fav group. this is one of the oldest and largest manufacturers. auto in china arrangements for joint projects. there is also a top-level during the state visit, the president had a rich program. meetings with the top leadership of the country and big business in belarus as a whole, china signed almost 4 dozen agreements of contracts worth 3.5 billion dollars in the next 3 years. belarus , the irkutsk region, expects to significantly increase investment in trade turnover and launch joint assembly production. this was announced at the meeting ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary of belarus to russia with the chairman of the government of the irkutsk region on the sidelines of the krasnoyarsk economic forum documented plans were signed. today, time will determine the areas for cooperation, at the start of this year

, trade turnover at the start of this year has already increased by 16% compared to the twenty-second belarusian agricultural machinery, three new enterprises have replenished the composition of the free economic zones of belarus, the total volume of declared investments is over 38 million dollars with the prospect of creating one and a half hundred new jobs so the production of furniture for wooden and metal building structures will appear in ses minsk a project to develop the production of pvc and aluminum products. visa-free entry for citizens to belarus is allowed at all checkpoints, innovations are already in force and will last until december 31 inclusive without visas was first introduced last year and was very popular, given the high demand for our visa-free entry from residents of lithuania and latvia , poland, the head of state extended it in the spring

of 2023, given the restrictions on the operation of checkpoints introduced by the polish authorities on the border with belarus and the continuing high demand for belarusian visa-free