and even more sports in the night edition of the program in the studio worked christina kamysh, see you.

hello on the air, the project to be in time before midnight, andrei vladimirovich savinykh is our guest. hello hello i can't help but ask you the most burning topic of discussion one of the most discussed topics of the past week. this, of course, is our participation in the osce parliamentary assembly and your speech, during which the representatives of ukraine apparently confused the parliamentary assembly. afraid. i tried to provoke a scandal by a meeting of the verkhovna rada

unfolded for some reason there is some kind of flag. uh, we know that the representatives of poland and lithuania like. in general, they boycotted when they found out that the belarusian russian delegation would take part. they will have a given word. why are they doing all this. uh, these are desperate attempts to intercept the informational initiative. to show that they are such good fellows, because all the same, everyone who needs to hear you and understand everything, well, i will share my impressions. e, it was very interesting the atmosphere was hot, i don’t argue, it was intense enough, but three circles of communication. let's say very uh, structured rational tough speeches. uh, were made by the american and british delegations around them, uh, there was a chorus. e delegation. mostly small countries. uh, the baltic states well, and other small countries of europe, northern europe, including those who

simply acted extremely emotionally. and there was this impression that they just want to turn it off. uh, a rational approach, uh, analysis of what they say and add maximum emotions, maximize them to untwist create this is feeling, yes, it was. eh, to create a sense of something happening. and they were followed by a number of delegations from the countries of old europe, and there, too, the difference was very clearly seen if some kind of green party from germany spoke. yes, this is the same tone , they, uh, walked along with small countries, if representatives of some conservative parties in germany spoke france, italy , that speech was more restrained, more rational, and by and large, they called for a settlement to common sense, but another question is that there were such speeches

a little and nobody heard them much , it felt like, well, these performances are not encouraged by the audience in the hall. uh-huh, we conveyed our position calmly and confidently. well , this is the abc of diplomatic work, therefore, well, everyone noted. just generally, how calm. you don't pay any. attention, continue talking. i don't represent myself. i represent the country on how i behave, uh, rationally or let's say even the authority on i speak depends on the impression of my country, so this is a big responsibility. well she helps to get together and behave extremely discreetly. well, the second point. uh, i've been in situations like this before when i worked in geneva on the human rights council. there the atmosphere of the meetings was sometimes just as

hot, listen. well, if, for example, we still return to the osce. hmm but this is hot . the atmosphere is only in the public plane or in the wings, too, there are some attempts to pry off, you know. a very amazing thing. uh, well, first of all, i want to say a few words about the austrian organizers. yes everything was organized. perfect. moreover, it was clear that there were people not only in the hall, but also in the backrooms of the technical staff, who were clearly represented by the security services. therefore, in this regard, everything was extremely correct, but the behavior of the delegates was also very different. uh, there weren't any on the sidelines. here already these e emotional attacks, rather, on the contrary. eh, you could catch a knowing look on yourself. in general, quite correctly respectfully passed to the elevator in the wardrobe. well, and so on. eh, this suggests

that they understand everything perfectly. just small countries are fighting for financial flows, and therefore large countries create this hysteria. we would like to change something, but they obviously cannot change it, and now it builds up due to this. here is the architecture. this is a strange atmosphere. hmm, a conclusion sometimes devoid of common sense. you mentioned just such hot situations in geneva, and as i understand it, well, you yourself spoke about the crisis, in principle, of international organizations. and i would like to ask a little more about the most, probably, such egregious cases of your memory, and how we should react when we we see that today diplomacy is clearly non-standard such diplomacy without rules, maybe we, too, should somehow start to react more aggressively or not? well, speaking of the last question. yes, i'm tougher, maybe she kind of balzac once

said that the steel fist should be disguised with a velvet glove. uh-huh. that's a very good metaphor. i think that we should simply take a principled approach to protecting our national interests, this is enough. uh, rougher, i don't think so. i think we need to be more collected. this means that within the country we can no longer postpone any issues we will do. it's time for tomorrow. we have to decide. it 's here and now why. because our inner composure, in fact , will be the guarantee of our security. and hence the next mobilization. we must prepare for difficult times. we must rally within the country. eh, for the most part. we must put departmental interests or some personal contradictions below

national interests. wow. and these are the measures such changes we must see everywhere in belarus, well, first of all, on the domestic agenda, and it will already be produced on the foreign policy position by speaking in the parliamentary assembly. obse you are fair, it seems to me absolutely. uh, they noticed that the countries of the collective west should be held accountable. at the end of my own, and first of all financially. as far as possible, and with what tools we could generally achieve this from them. you are asking very hard questions. and uh question which to put in a broader perspective yes indeed west uh very dominated the world for decades, in fact. uh, forming a unipolar

world order and so many things got away with them , but this cannot continue indefinitely. today we see the reformatting of the world, the reformatting of the unipolar world is much more polar, this does not mean that globalization will continue. this means that there will be authoritative, respected strong players. we can talk more about this, uh, who will make the decisions. and it is precisely in these conditions that a certain account will be presented to everyone causal relationship. no one has canceled its laws, the same as the laws of universal gravitation or the laws of thermodynamics without any doubt. uh, this account will be held responsible for the actions taken lies with all players. e international community is another matter. how will it be implemented? i hope that this

will not be realized through a military clash, but rather through a change in the balance of power. well, for example, the international trade system , the global financial system, the emergence of new currencies, by virtue of which these countries that have allowed such a distortion will be forced to compensate for this damage, which will go to restore the whole world and, moreover, it will form a more just world of order. uh, i like this form, in which the right to development to prosperity will be for all countries, and not just for a select few. well, not for the first time in an interview with you , a couple of years ago, your predictions came true. i hope this next forecast will be. it's interesting. i can say that we are now living in a complex but fast historical time that used to take decades. it has been going on for a year now. i suppose

that's the point of reorganization. uh, or as the pilot says, to the point of no return, we will enter a very short historical period. uh, a maximum of three or four years, and when we talk about these numbers, i would like to say three rather than four classes. we have a very detailed weather forecast. let's see, let's see another topic that caused a vivid resonance. these are the visits of alexander lukashenko to china this is the meeting alexander we are sitting lukashenka, and his historical visits are clearly not only about belarusian chinese relations. well, gloo. especially coverage. what do you think, well, what exactly does it affect, what caused such a reaction, the opposition from the world drove some incredible fakes about skirmishes at the borders about an airplane explosion, just to divert attention from this visit. well, that was the part. i think information confrontation. and this is clearly a topic

that goes over the top. uh, any opposition matter. this is what we have already said about the fact that the multipolar world is being formed now precisely the parameters and principles on which it will function are set, and a new agenda is being formed around china russia countries-rich countries-shows. many countries are striving to join these associations, they are striving to be friends with these partners in order to form the principles for the functioning of a multipolar world. and belarus too, respectively. we are moving towards this cooperation with our own model of international relations, a model that is built on respect for the interests of a partner on an equal , equal and mutually beneficial financial basis. economic interaction. this is a new

model that perfectly fits into the idea of ​​this multipolar world order. and this is dangerous for the unipolar world for those countries that are losing their positions. it is clear that they are trying to somehow discredit divert attention. uh, question in any of the available ways, but because they have no direct influence. they use information warfare techniques. this is where all these media provocations come from, then let's talk about the crisis, not the information one, but the real one. union i'm everything i’m trying to understand whether he is in his existential state of disintegration or vice versa. just a reorganization, because between warsaw berlin the split is deepening against the backdrop of arms supplies to ukraine and hungary, the deputies openly say that nato, the european union, is a full-fledged participant in the ukrainian conflict, because it seems to be , as contrary to

the official version, brussels that is, we see such internal unrest practically, every weekend we see protests. and what will happen next? you set the ultimate interesting a geopolitical issue, and each country and each association has its own historical development cycles, if for russia it is somewhere around 100-120 years, then for the usa it is also about 100 years europe it seems to me that it develops in a long cycle of 700-600 years . uh, today they are clearly entering the period from the uh crisis to the period of reorganization reformatting here i want to reassure right away. thank god that the story does not tolerate, uh, ending. yes, no one always puts an end to it, therefore , i think that it is rather better to consider. this no way. uh, destruction, more like reformatting. and we see the lines along which this reformatting is taking place

. brussels, part of the nordic countries, they are beyond any doubt under control. uh, i would call it like a cluster, a multinational corporation uguster needs national uh owners who feel great, whether in london or in new york, or somewhere else in australia, in melbourne, for example, and their national state interests. it seems to me that brussels, to a certain extent, is acting in line with precisely these interests are not national another issue is that a number of continental elites, primarily the south of germany, the north of italy, austria. they understand , the logic of this process and are trying to build protective mechanisms. they are trying to save resources and create opportunities for themselves to

rebuild europe, in my understanding. it seems to me that hungary does not act alone , hungary has become such a dandy. e, who is already talking aloud about the interests of precisely these circles. i think that it is continental europe that is among those regions and countries that i have named and will become point of reassembly of already sovereign europe , which will come out from under the political. the influence of the anglo-saxon world and which will build its new e-politics, how quickly this will happen, we will see, but beyond any doubt. this is a new, renewed europe, it will be friendly to both russia and belarus and eurasia as a whole. still , i’m joking, they allowed themselves to joke that it seems to me that europe is returning to a time when it didn’t live at the expense of its colonies and others, it really survived, here in e in

fragmentation, certain internal some kind of struggle at the expense of their own labor. well, yes, them. it’s like you’ll have to get used to it again at the expense of your own labor. well enough poor hungry. i don't know, i'm certainly, well, subjective no, it's not subjective. these are quite ordinary historical facts, which are not particularly pedaled now, let's say, yes, here, but in reality yes, europe lived quite hard and difficult. no, europe has begun. in my opinion, with the advent of the russian tarp system and within the framework of the confrontation between the ussr and the usa within the framework of a bipolar world. uh, then the idea of ​​socialism have become dangerous and very attractive for this cluster of transnational corporations for owners. ah, property. that's when the decision was made to create a large enough middle class to finance its

prosperous life in order to reduce the attractiveness of the ideas of socialism once, and secondly, uh, this also required the task of the industrial revolution of large-scale production. but now we have already passed this period and the reduction and reduction of human rights in the standard of living. that's it this middle class today is called e british american. kvesami e, quiet revolution elite uh-huh and they tell you aloud about this, a large number of scientific papers are published that say that the countries of the west are already countries. after democracy, that real democracy is absent there. and where there are still these elements of tradition, institutions, they are curtailed. they lose funding and disband. here,

this is a very dangerous process that is now taking place in almost everything in all countries of the collective west, and we must understand these processes and see them. welcome back to the middle ages, and if we talk about another western partner, this is the united states, and there i personally think it’s funny donald trump said the day before that he was the only presidential candidate who can prevent and very easily the third world war. but while everything goes to her, by the way, trump. and now the bidens, too, as the doll brings to kiev, he walks there and promises the kiev regime to help waste and words, the outcome directly depends. uh, us elections or not. no and yes and no. here the correct answer will be yes and no, see the logic, the united states of america also does not have its own sovereignty as a nation state. they are managed by a cluster of multinational corporations by the owners of these

corporations and the federal reserve. including these people, uh, decide what the course of the new american president will be, and the presidents themselves, whether it be biden or trump, they do not decide anything. actually. they had a certain consensus. we are saved, the united states of america at a cost. uh, the collapse of the economy of the rest of the world. it was a period, just like president trump, when he was admitted to power, and he began to implement this program. remember the sanctions against china and russia, remember this is the creation of such constant pressure in the interests of america exclusively. but it was during this period that this class was the owner of the social stratum. e. let's speak more simply than western oligarchs. they understood the price

to be paid for this reorganization. it is too high and their unity is shattered. eh, to such an extent that they are ready they went to falsify the american elections. bringing the bike to put. well, it's completely clear they broke. inside, an elite consensus. which of the scenarios will win now no one can say yet, but the longer the conflicts last, the deeper and harder the fall in the united states of america will be. that's what i can say for sure. how this will happen we will see in the coming years. that is, we again have a cycle with them. eh, you know, that's what i've already told me about it with them. eh, really they go out a cycle. uh, very serious internal collision will be a civil war. or will it just be unrest, will it be the exodus of certain

social er, groups or ethnic groups from the united states , for example, to australia or new zealand , it is too early to say now, but without a doubt, this is a cycle that can be called the arrival of the civil war period and the reset for american glass only. e. i want to say that according to the estimates of the us sociological services, more than 50% of americans are ordinary americans who, it seems, are not interested in politics are convinced that some form of civil war in the united states will occur within the next year. you can imagine the expectations of the population of a politician not interested in this politician and not at all interested. and very soon , on march 10, it will already fall to take part in the session of the inter-parliamentary union a-a. the organization works closely with the un, it seems that they have very similar interests and principles. well, as a journalist, i am disappointed. vaughn

very often also mentioned a certain crisis of international organizations. and in the end, what what are your expectations from this upcoming session and what agenda will belarus broadcast? well, first of all, i want to say that international organizations are, first of all, member states, and he and the entire system of organization of the un system was created during the period of the bipolar world, when there was a balance between the usa and the ussr, and as a result of this agenda, through the balance of power, it was possible, to implement a sufficiently large number of positive and positive programs it was then that this impression of efficiency was created. he's about what she can decide more and more, a serious task. now that the unipolar world is collapsing, starting with the imbalance and funding and program activities and conflict between member states. and this, of course , cannot but affect the organizations themselves, which is why

they are in crisis as soon as we reach the new point of balance, which we call the hapolar world. we will be able to sit down at the negotiating table, well, practically on the initiative of the president of belarus, alexander grigorievich, to hold feathers. which, regarding the world of the device of its principles functioning, and then all these international organizations will again become effective assistants in the implementation of this new program and agenda . the inter-parliamentary union is generally one of the oldest uh international organizations in the world, delegations gather there. well , at least 100-120 countries have national parliaments and certainly. i think this is an excellent platform where we can state our position and we will talk about the need. uh, support for this process by the formation of a multipolar world. we will

talk about the principles, uh, on which it should be built, we will look for allies. in support of this process, and finally, we will talk about the threats and challenges and how we can all make this process manageable. once and secondly, so that this process does not cross, just the same line of hot war. yes, economic cataclysms are inevitable, of course. a crisis is inevitable sanctions have already become a commonplace today, but it is extremely important not to go to the verge of mutual destruction and i believe that the inter-parliamentary union there is confidence that we can handle it, yes, there will be difficulties, but we will cope, the faster, the better, the more mobilized, united development-oriented we are. this is the main leitmotif. it seems to me all of our all of our

behavior, both domestically and internationally. thank you on this positive note we conclude thank you for your attention. thank you for talking. the most current event from the world of sports on the scammer continues to fight for play-in success, who yes on the right to compete for the playoffs in the kharlamov cup hard training and interesting meetings. perfect shooting is obtained when you don’t think about anything, when you can still run about 5 years ago. i thought, why do i need all this at all? every time it was hard when there is competition, and you try to show yourself more, you work more, and it seems to me that this is only for the benefit of victory and defeat. everyone

is working very hard in their clubs. i think that we are definitely not getting worse, but there was such a slight excitement, because yes, as they say, for a long time didn't play together. watch in sports projects on belarus tv channel 24 unique exhibits from under the sky in belarus the phenomenon of digital art, smooth movements, grace and greatness of classical dance and such a mysterious and bewitching belarusian circus, watch the fashion for culture project only on our tv channel.

i work in a new drama theater, but today we'll talk about the difficulties of the acting profession. good afternoon on the air, the program say, do not be silent studio victoria popova and svetlana smolonskaya. and today we have a guest theater and film actor sergey is broad. good afternoon sergey good afternoon. hello, welcome to our studio. you graduated from the traditional belarusian, theatrical art institute, studied on the course. from a bright married couple. these are the parents of the now famous actor andrei dushechkin, andrei dushechkin korsakovsky and people's artist of the ussr

alexander klimov e. did the facts that this is a husband and wife family and how they taught you leave any imprints on the educational process? what? well, first of all, i want to say that they were wonderful people. it's lovely teachers. here and well most of all. of course, there is more than anyone else and better and as they say, he brought me up. this is andrei valentinovich, we will say so, because at that time alexander ivanova was engaged in the stage very often played on the prompts of the russian theater. well, teaching with e. the game is very difficult at times to combine, she was a coming star. right? yes , absolutely right. of course, they are all wings. all this is so. eh, my waifarii were like this, but here, well, a lion's. uh, the share of education, of course, so that andrey valentinovich shows sergey there is an opinion that those people who studied at creative universities in the late eighties, er, just before the collapse, just before the devastation and collapse of the soviet union, they

were totally unlucky. you will agree with this opinion. well, in the theater as in any living organism. there are laws, there are ups and downs. there are good luck. there are cottages. naturally, it never develops evenly, so er, that's the time. that's just the beginning. well, for centuries, it just happened that the theater, it seems to me, was in such a difficult situation, because, uh, the market is some kind of house such here people cease to be interested in culture arts to walk less. and you yourself know that if the audience does not go to the theater , the theater is sad, of course, therefore, such a thing that we can say 100% sure that we then got a little bit.

success was in school. hmm, zero, with the exception of some kind of amateur performance, which we had staged by klopp, i was called there playing a seller of glue. here, well, then somehow everything

began to spin. after school, i got an assistant cameraman at a film studio. then after that i tried it for the first time enter the theater institute. they didn't take me. i wrote an essay for two. but after that, i went to work as a fitter at the kupalovsky theater, and worked there for a year and after that i firmly knew that i would do it again. this is not the first time i hear such a biography of a assembler in a theater becoming an actor, what is it that is exciting about you ? well, i would say, so that i got to know this behind-the-scenes world, firstly, what happens, how everything is cooked live , exactly how the artists go out on how they are rehearsing. the most important thing is that but this is very, very, in principle, inciting, and in that sense i then had someone to look at, then the famous were from vladimir.

makarova is older than the white-tailed viktor tarasov , a whole galaxy of wonderful artists, who were just interesting to watch and , to be honest, in addition to my work, i often peeped behind the scenes. and how did you end up in the bresk theater? well, like all students of theater universities, they go through the distribution here, but in the same way as in minsk in the torah was to get settled. just uh, impossible to take. here is one from the strength of two people. here, uh, we distributed, got to brest, here are as many as five people with a course. and most importantly, i do not regret anything that i got there, this choice was not painful for you. here from minsk they left for brestli, of course, of course, most from under the wing of their parents they went there alone, all this to exist on the artist’s salary, live there in a hostel. first. it is very difficult. that's

four years. well, the fact is that i was lucky that it was already after the army. i am already raped experience. it was even. mm, how is that an outlet, how are the services? no? no, i also like that so many of our actors. our guests remember their period of service in the army, as a very important stage, here alexander pashkevich was, he is the one who posts army photos of his on all holidays. well, you also think that it was one school of life, and then to break away from your parents, probably , it was not so difficult to bring up, but all the more so you served for a year and a half, and at first i served now in the urine, and then i moved already military unit here on belinsky here. uh-huh yes, today brest is called an ultra-modern city, as if it responds faster than others to all sorts of new travel businesses in the beauty industry, not only the theater

is developing rapidly in it. eh, what do you remember over these four years with the warmest and most breathtaking memories, because for the first time i felt myself somewhere in the place, that something was coming out in a bowl. at the beginning, i would never have played such roles that i was simply entrusted there with us then there was a very good performance. the children of my arbat across europe even drove in brest at that time. it was truly a discovery. here is the director who came. he really trusted young artists. in this case, he and i somehow managed to create a story on the website of the brest drama theater. and there, just this period, when you served, these names appear so loud among them, and children of the arbat, too, it was such a period, search, or something, yes, creative the fact is that when i came to my classmates, and then

joined the theater, then seven people from the kiev theater institute. and the total mass turned out to be 15 people of young artists , this is such a blood run, as if in a theater and he began to bore. some ideas started interesting performances. in general, the friendship of the team. this is first of all. it was important and then we, uh, really somehow got up a little bit. if it is possible, so to speak, in such a plan, all the more so, then the difference was still the choice of the team and the director of the theater director. here we have chosen e sasha kozyka, then he was an actor, e he is the current director then the director. this also influenced it, they themselves steered it. in general, yes, yes, yes. well, somehow we were on you, we'll say, so uh, and that's a lot. so, many years later, sergei, you visited brest with the corpse of a new drama theater at the festival. uh, belaya vezha theater festival. e. well, experienced a sense of nostalgia. well, of course, the fact is that we

performed in dk e culture, which are located on the extremely brest this used to be considered this for dvorki, so we lived there and worked in the hostel. here, and so, of course, in general , the city of brestan, i would say, well, in a word, it’s always nice to come there in e. and it was doubly pleasant when the performance ended. it was a real surprise. i didn't invite any of uh, my former friends. and when i was met backstage by my e, former colleagues with whom i played in brest it was just extremely, great, i almost swam, because, well, it was nice to hear a couple of warm words from them. in general, what they liked the performance. and what he says is strange and interesting, but it’s very interesting , it’s clear that before you entered the new drama theater in minsk, you still worked at

the puppet theater, and i heard the opinion that puppeteers are the elite of theatrical art. you will agree to support this idea. i would say differently that e puppet theater, he was then. yes, very varied. it's just that he traveled abroad very often, of course, to be honest. uh, any artist dreams of going on tour somewhere in europe and the dolls went, then very often here and this is one of the reasons for such, in principle, it even served that i tried there, but got there quite by accident. so i was going to leave for st. petersburg because there was also an interview. they took me to the theater on liteiny well, then my friends met me at the station literally saying, where are you going. here we now have the master and margarita performance, which looked gorgeous , we just don’t have enough, azaz. there will be tests tomorrow. come, there will be three people there, you will try with this one. so don’t think for a long time, and

between st. petersburg and minsk you choose minsk there were just issues with housing, problematic there and here, my parents had an apartment, and there is a completely empty place after the brest army - this is not new. test somewhere. later i scolded her all for myself, because who knows how she would have been placed there, but nevertheless it happened, and they took me to the pipe of the puppet theater and i just with pleasure played a lot. in this performance, the performance was one of the best in general, uh, critics from moscow came to us , but, well, then, uh, in my opinion, lyubimov if i am not mistaken, he said that he saw three productions by the most successful master. it was in st. petersburg in moscow, and oddly enough, in the puppet theater in the museum of the puppet theater you can still find exhibits from this legendary performance, there are copies. here they

still have it. maybe your azazel costumes have it too. well, really. it was a discovery. it was revelation. quite a lot of time has passed, but i remember this is the development of the older junior. yes, that's why that rare case when bulgakov succumbed. yes? uh-huh theater, it went 3 1/2 hours. uh, at the same time , bulgakov was walking in russian at the same time. and somewhere else i will tell you that many artists came quietly on the sly. eh, of course it's so envy of some kind. well, you can come. yes, if everything is as you say, in principle, it worked out quite well for you with the theater from theater life. why has the moment come? when you basically left the stage and went into business. it was a disappointment, what about

art in itself? why did it happen so? well , most likely, probably, maybe in yourself, because you know that when it all started with this restructuring with these innovations, when people just started earning some big money, basically. i must have succumbed to the temptation that if i don't try now, i won't succeed later. and it is natural that at the beginning i played a one-time role in the performance of the master, and then slowly, when he was written off, i just left unnoticed. you left his business. but it was trade , trade, trade, buy and sell. yes, in principle, that was between poland. here and minsk by the way, the famous new targ was buried, there are all my companions, all the friends who worked there with me. here i am, on duty, and skated 10-15 somewhere, it turned out like that even then. it's not an easy job.

i can tell you that it was hard. i 'll tell you. it's more. e for all my commercial activities. but i was robbed twice the first time succeeded the second time, yes. but we will say this, you need to have the courage to probably survive it. so it's e to put up with it, but, nevertheless, it was not easy. that's the problem. well glory the god of the theater took his own in 2017. you returned to the new dramatic began to serve there still works in the current. in your repertoire, you are engaged in six performances and in staging khamsinkh with a friend of sergei kulikovsky, many viewers were struck by how easily the theater mastered the aesthetics of the jewish mentality, where humor is adjacent to tragedy. let's watch a little trailer.

sergey, the role of kirtsel is easy for you it was given at all, is the nationality of the hero he plays important for an actor, or is the actor a man of the world, if it weren’t for me i would have asked her, yes, because they are something that touches me. this is the most. the main thing woke up, the most interesting thing is that sergei mikhailovich, our director, he is amazingly accurate. e, i distributed the character and i don’t know how it is, but it seems to me that it’s different. well, it just couldn't be . you see, well, at least among the male company, which is hmm and on

some personal relationships. and so, well, somewhere in the dot and when we had already begun to work, that it would turn out, maybe even a little bit more like you a little bit, but as always. it seems to me that in our performances for complete happiness they always feel. if the conceived filet was not realized by 75%, then we can assume that you have already done everything that god did, therefore, sergey makes allowances for the circumstances. you also play recklessly and in the performance of the water were one-act plays. chekhov anniversary and proposals. again, focus on the screen. do you

understand the chekhovian nature of his genius, why do they like to mess around with him in the net of the world? why don't they leave him? why is he still interested? what is the mystery of chekhov when he studied at institute? i was fond of chekhov's unpublished stories, i told a lot, i always tried to find something like that for us , some kind of slightly forbidden mound that could be told in principle. with a skew there is so well, unfortunately, i don’t consider it now, but in it. yes, our guest was the artistic director of the kupala theater olga nefedova. she said that she sleeps like chekhov in the sense that she reads chekhov at night to herself , the heroine of the popular play zhanna, which

is going on in your theater and an iron businesswoman. and in this performance you also have a small the role of a businessman. and since you were in business, you probably understand the psychology of business people, and they are interesting to you as characters. the fact is that i would say that the people of business. these are generally tragic people , because the basis of always without a person is the cure of profit as much as possible profitability, and everything else is in the background. you see, this can go into inferiority called personal life, family relationships and some good habits in the chapter. rather, everything is put at the basis, of course, this is profit, this is ah, and this is a person's time to do a little. i wouldn't say it better, but business people, at the same time, i notice they love to visit the theater and concerts very much. that is, this is what is for them. this is

some kind of outlet. probably because about 30 people will come to us tonight, with whom i used to work, in principle, with whom i was friends and did business , but you say there is nothing left in them, only two buttons. but what is it that is delusional when he, i would say that, as they say, some people want to fill you somehow with his presence. in principle or as they say hmm to come to us somehow closer. so in such a good sense of the word, because after all, business. it 's a little bit boring in the sense that it's always the same . yes, this is only the doroshenko theater . probably, we will interrupt for a while and we have a telegram channel. say don't be silent. subscribe ask questions and suggest guests we are in touch. be quiet, and

we have a guest theater and film actor sergei sorochin. let's talk in this part. about cinema is very rich. the biography of about 70 is written by the sites of film roles with sergei shirochin. but i think there are actually many more. you have worked with such stars, whether they are yarmolnik vladimir kostyukhin. ah, and many, many other stars. there is a feeling that the popularity of the belarusian film actor is not reported, or does everyone get what they deserve? certainly. what 's the sin here, the question is that my friend, e, once said such a phrase, he says that we are the cutters of russian artists, you understand? it turns out that the main share, yes, not the main part, of course, falls on russian performers. and we are already like this completion. this is the second plan, for example, episodes. there are secondary roles, here and in this

situation to reverse. here it is needed, probably, some kind of national idea. i would say pride in my artists. in principle, i can’t even name a director who would promote belarusian artists. first of all, you know, it was completely different before. but somehow, and now it all leveled off. and well there such a thing as the artist's media quality, and so here are the customers who invest in cinema. they say that such a media person is not needed. and there you are as you want and already, and there as you want, it turns out, what happens at some time. i treat popularity hmm with irony. i would say it was a very funny incident at the pizzeria. my family and i went for a bite to eat. but, well, at that time two pictures came out, one advertisement, and they began to somehow recognize me in the city in the back table. uh, when we came in man

i got up and said hello, i realized that it was me who was recognized. he also nodded in response. here it is popularity, and every time, after about 15 minutes, this man got up and raised a toast, saying that he drank to my health. naturally. i said, please, and when we were already leaving. here is passing by this man. so he got up , bowed, said, and i recognized you as the expulsion of the spirit. he happened to play in one bowl on the projects of the russian politician monarchist and black hundreds vladimir parishkevich, known for his conservative views. here you are in character. was it difficult play a real historical character, but it was in the shooting were down already, i'll tell you what absolutely. i put on a suit, how they will make a beard, um. i went up the steps myself. i felt a little different. here it does not know it. maybe magic. maybe i invent

myself works inspires. yes, yes atmosphere is very important. and i'm an impressionable person , you know, and for me it's all to think that here once they walked along these steps, here are people from the past. moreover, such that here everything is great. in this sense, you feel yourself politically as a centrist conservative liberal. is there some kind of, uh, definition of yourself in politics, or are you not interested at all? i'm a conservative, of course, yes. this one, you know me nice. uh, in principle, the former old such good as our father said, old lady. well, that's why i met there so i relate to this matter. that's because i don't know. that's probably how he was brought up. and what will you decipher the old woman, what did this concept include before? and the water is warmer more transparent the products were cleaner called the girls were beautiful this. well, the relationship was

more frank. well, uh, time is ticking. what's here? as the saying goes. uh, walking around for a long time, yes, around everything changes. we are growing up a little. we are getting a little more experienced. here somewhere we begin to grumble about something, probably, well, this is aside or a sentiment, which is the ussr or in his youth. it's you who is different, most likely, they say here that the bad is forgotten. and here, but good, she is completely always. right now this is with me, probably, the situation is happening, you know, there is nostalgia, yes, yes, so call yourself a progressive person. i can't remember you well sergey, as a terry, as a conservative, then tell me, but your temperament and character. what kind of conflict you have, you are already and well, they are such artists, in principle, they are silent, silent, agree. and then they can flare up let's uh, somewhere i read that you can say about one person, in one word, the truth about another. you can say some kind of phrase, and the third one can write

a sentence, and the fourth one. you can write a whole page, and the sixth is roman and not together, so you understand it, and you think about imagining as a i am a human anecdote anecdote that matches your character. you are afraid, of course, i keep her in shape with the help of sports once a week. i definitely go to the pool when i can, i also enjoy cycling. you recently starred in an american thriller film, which received a very high audience rating, it has a high rating. let's see a small snippet. tyoma stand still, old man, i'm a friend, you're not my friend. happy birthday. i'm

here jane we need your help. you say jane so who are you, i came to subdue the light. he was disabled, and then to the house on a polyrobber, where did they come from them. breaking news three masked men pulled out an atm directly from a bank branch according to the police chief, the criminals took advantage of the turmoil during a city protest, two masked men left the branch. what is curious is the film co-produced by the usa russia with the participation of the belarusian actor sergei shirochin, and you

must admit that you give such a jack nicholson in this film. i made my own collage i thought it looked very similar. uh. your role on his famous blue role. look one face, but i wonder how you ended up in this project. it was all in english. here they didn’t ask a single russian word, they called. how are you with english? i say, well, more or less with a dictionary, as they say, so sail once i can say, they say, well, well. here but what is there to come, in principle, i say the text. only give me please, we went almost there somewhere under the lithuanian border, but in some kind of farm, right? yes, yes, yes, yes they are provided the actors with a location. so i'm fine. i say, i come to the site of the text. no i'm talking lyrics lord

wait now. i was already somehow tormented by doubts and thought now, well, as he always says, well, look, and there are two pages, but you have english in shock there. they immediately took off my beard and ran away, then there was half an hour left, right? eh, before filming, what kind of english is it? here i would say so much in russian to bewildered, in general, as if nothing bothers you, we still have a little another way. let's go then. we just broke it into several parts. if i spoke incorrectly, then, in principle, not an understudy, but a prompter corrected me. i repeated this after him and the situation was saved. i'll just install them later. i don't know how it turned out ideally. hmm here. but i liked this interesting method. the fee is different. i realized that the mess is the same as in all cinema

venues. there is a difference in american cinema to act in belarusian, like in russian. well, they said thank you. well said, thanks. of course not, yes, that's all right in this regard. well, interesting, he said that he wanted to take off his beard and run away, but uh, don't do that anymore, because in fact the audience is in the comments on your film work. a very generous compliment. well, they assume that you would be good, uh, in the role of luzhkov, chernomyrdin zhandybin. and they say khrushchev, nikita sergeevich is a direct spitting image and you have such a type you don’t mind, it’s not against the question in the same it was already like that i was summoned to ukraine, but because of the border obstacles there, i just don’t turned out to go somewhere there you are standing first in line for execution. yes, there is something very similar. but i'm not clean, physically, we can't bring you. that's all,

santa claus, you played a german officer. and in general, really and the form suits you what place this topic occupies in your life. and in general, what do you think about the conflict of this patriotism, that history is being rewritten for us now that the genocide should be remembered anew by the belarusian people during the war. wow it's complicated, of course, the question and well firstly, let's start with the fact that these german roles, but they always had something hmm was so curious. actually, sometimes i like to play mirzatsy somehow then that's something, because there is something to play there, you understand? so this is it, and already the question is what.