delicious and selfish bridles and original gifts a bouquet of marshmallows will surprise any person with a lot of benefits. well, kind of taste. that is, it was given and you can eat it. it will not just stand, it will wither, and, as it were, such a shaft will have to be thrown away, i am cooking the effect. uh, marshmallow hydrangea rose tulips. well, these are the main flowers that i make such marshmallow buds, kind, feather-bearer. i am cold. such as hunting rushi tulips and hydrangeas can be of different sizes and colors. at the shape of a bouquet of a lion there is more and more corruption on this site, probably, our site of the tvr-tangle of beeline receives a lot in the evening.

hello. with you, the project is clear. with marina

karaman, where we do not hesitate to talk about financial resources and financial resources in our and other people's pockets. today, a look at whether we need military parades, should we be ashamed of spending on defense and how much is spent on it ? nearby dangerous opponent and it is not worth entering its territory with a growl . the predator demonstrates the volume of the pectoral muscles, and to everyone who sees it, the sharpness of the fangs. that's it, this is the defense resource of the lion and presenting it to a potential opponent, leo saves time and effort on those who need such a demonstration so as not to meddle . someone has already written comments to the lions under the videos that when they growl they look ridiculous, it's cold outside for market and it would be better if they roared at the children. then why are such comments still flickering

under the news about the pumping of military potential belarus, according to the international trading agency economex, in 2021 our defense budget amounted to $ 763 million, in this amount, the cost of modernizing the army , the maintenance of equipment and military units, payments to the military and the purchase of weapons. but is it a lot or a little. now let's figure it out. the stockholm institute for peace research reported that in 21 , the united states spent the most on the planet on the army of weapons , $ 801 billion, followed by china, $ 293 billion . russia $ 65.9 billion, mind you, the defense industry of russia is 12 times less than that of the united states, the list includes the 40 most generous defense

states on the planet and belarus is not in it, because our country's military spending is too modest to get into the top 40. but ours neighbor. poland is on the twentieth line there in 21 years. she spent more than 13 billion dollars on defense. ukraine on the thirty -sixth, it has almost 6 billion, that is, a larger military budget, like our 17, but in the coming year it will increase it to warsaw. almost double. while chuckles sounded on the network the topic yes, who is going to fight here, the country , which is only hastily separated from us, did not consider this question ridiculous and methodically poured a lot of money into armaments in 2018. this is $ 10.7 billion in 2019 billion in the twentieth, the budget grew by another 500 million, and in 2021 poland spent $ 13.7 billion on military affairs,

based on the country's gdp, it invested more in a potential war a little more than two percent of it. well, this is not enough for warsaw a month ago, prime minister morovets said that in the twenty-third year the budget will grow to almost 201 billion dollars, which is three and 1/10% of poland's gdp or 27 of our defense budgets. plus, about 8 billion more. gives more for the purchase of equipment and weapons. not defensive, as was immediately stated, but offensive abrams tanks, for example, are definitely no longer in order to shoot back from the border leggings. this, given that more than ten military bases of nato and the united states have already been deployed on the territory of poland at the training ground, zhagan, near the city of sventyshev, began to build another a star-striped base and 12 nato ones are planned near the cities of crushed stone and pnjongzhe cherry on this powder cake sat down with a request from the polish authorities to place american

nuclear missiles on their territory, that is , a country that spends dozens of times more on weapons and the army is at a distance of a march from us, than we contain hangars full of american soldiers and american weapons and very much asks to give them a nuclear bazooka with an eye in our direction, where are the questions for poland. why where are the chuckles and mockery? ukrainian spending on military affairs in 2021 officially amounted to 5.9 billion dollars , this year they decided to increase them, but now it is impossible to talk about real amounts, the country is full of lisa in echelons. american technology is coming. biden, does not have time to voice the amount of the delivery, which ukraine will definitely have to give to calculate the amount. even approximately, it will come out only when hostilities end there and ukraine is billed. lithuanian military spending in 2021 was announced at the level of one and 7/10 billion

dollars. according to local statistics, the country's gdp reached 65.5 billion, that is, spending on a possible war pulled two and six tenths of gdp, how much lithuania spent on tanks and guns this year, we will find out later, but for now the country's defense minister said that in 23 he will almost double funding for this area, he promises an amount above 2.5 % of gdp concern for their safety. lithuania is forced, like poland, it is a member of nato, and everyone who joins this peace-loving organization without sniffing it automatically has a duty to spend at least two percent of gdp on american weapons of money for it there is no lithuania, so it constantly asks for a loan of that same weapon, then the funds for it are a funnel that draws earnings into itself, but throws out inflation and pieces of the inedible. latvia is also pouring more and more money into the army, the president of this country

promised to increase military spending in the summer. reported that by 2025. they will amount to 2.5% of gdp, now we are talking about two percent. this is about 975 million dollars they are going to spend on the purchase of aviation, the construction of new bases for nato and american soldiers it is noteworthy that latvia asks brussels for money, either for firewood, or for a fence at the border, or for rescuing its entrepreneurs, but the duty to buy american weapons is performed regularly without pants. but on a rocket. because china and russia are strategic opponents of the states and the army has to be maintained such that, if anything, recapture the defense industry of russia at 66 billion and china at 293 billion. yes, and all even the most controversial financial anomalies. there it is customary to greet the cuesor with a cry and put a hand to an empty head. russia's defense budget is really

is not impressive in amounts, especially against the background of the american one, as mentioned above, it is 12 times less, but this does not mean at all that the russian army is 12 times inferior to the us army in order to produce weapons of equal effectiveness in russia spend three, and then five times less funds than in the states why because overseas in the defense industrial complex corruption flourishes wildly there is pure business? weapons and equipment in the united states are produced by private companies. they include in the cost of the work of third-party designers money for advertising promotion materials and stamping almost half of the cost of defense in the united states stretches the maintenance of the army salaries and pensions of contract soldiers paying for their accommodation and training roaming and food medical care and recreation of cola and ice cream. in addition, americans constantly pay for the construction and maintenance of military bases in others there are more than a thousand of them all over the planet. these are not only complexes with soldiers , this air base tracking station, training

and testing grounds. and the united states also has a giant fleet that plows the planet is stationed far from its native shores, and the maintenance of which also needs to be paid for by the us military expenses are so inflated, because the us military machine is a bulky steroid jock and even 800 one billion dollars may not be enough to feed it. you can’t exactly call our spending on defense unnecessary. they are 1049 times less than in the united states 86 times less than in russia 27 times less than in neighboring poland 2.2 times less than in lithuania and almost one and a half times less than in latvia yes in monetary terms our defense budget is modest compared to the costs of the same direction of our neighbors. but this is due to the fact that our budget is real and really defensive, it is not inflated by corruption schemes, extortions and, most importantly,

plans for a democratic offensive. it is aimed only at protecting the country in the event of an attack. and for protection, feeding it to the level of polish, for example, is not necessary here. as in many areas of life in belarus, everything is decided by the approach. even eu military experts admit that at low cost we have one of the most combat-ready armies of the continent. first, because we have a developed military-industrial complex with most of the advanced military and reconnaissance equipment. we develop and release software for ourselves, our programmers also write software, while the belarusian military-industrial complex does not take anything from what was said during development. but he puts millions of dollars into the treasury from the sale of weapons equipment abroad, and of course he creates them for his state secondly, because we have a reserve system. call in case of attack, i emphasize only in case massive attack on our country together with contractors to protect the belarusians. approximately 300,000 people will come out. well, and

thirdly, because our ally russia guarantees us protection in a variety of ways, including nuclear in the event of a threat. the president said, and i will repeat. if you want peace, prepare for war, two of the five countries with which we share borders are now conducting hostilities; attack on our territory has always been a threat, after all, not today we found ourselves on a piece of the earth who want to crush many under them, but now questions arise. can our commander-in-chief ignore the sparks around belarus, even if the likelihood of an invasion is small for us, that there is nothing to defend? nothing to cherish what they are achieving media that have been sarcastic for years every time it comes to strengthening the military shield of belarus, what they want to achieve now, raising the air of feathers and panic due to

the deployment of an allied military groupings. the president outlined the main task of these actions do not allow belarus to be drawn into the war. why is there a subtext here. does this task seem insufficient to strengthen the borders, if you want peace, prepare for war? this is about the fact that no one will encroach on your territory as long as you can growl, when proven equipment and fresh progressive developments come out on the central street of minsk, and the commander -in-chief in a cheerful spirit takes them behind the thorn of a hastily erected flimsy fence someone in another slams its mouth shut because understands beyond the teeth, so far only by the lips, but the pride sees. there is someone to stand up for him, everyone in his place continues to do his own thing and the country lives. i am marina karamana, which looks out of a camouflage case. we figured it out, everything is clear. see you soon.