[000:00:00;00] there is reason to believe that this large-scale scam is intended not only for profit, but also for political dividends in germany and other countries , the same structures that pay for three flights of rescuers to the clivian coast receive money for working with migrants, in addition, regulating the direction and volume of refugee traffic it is possible to put pressure on any eu government on the weekend , unstable and contrasting weather is predicted by belarusians, snow is expected. rain in some areas, blizzard on the roads sleet. on saturday the wind will increase to 20 m/s, at night -6° in the afternoon up to 7 heat, and in the southern regions plus 10 , the upcoming weekend weather conditions on the territory of our republic will determine the frontal sections. here is the cyclone on sunday, the territory of our country will be in its cooler sexual part, so the temperature background will drop a little, precipitation will take on a short-term character. the air temperature at night in the republic will be in the range from zero there minus six

daily maximum will fluctuate from a slight minus to a slight plus minus two plus four. it will still be wet and windy early next week. more information from my colleagues at 15:00. i say goodbye to you on this. all the best, have a great weekend. good evening, this is the economic environment in belarus, one of the satellite tv channels belarus 24. today we will talk on a very sensitive topic of taxation. changes for

entrepreneurs , individuals and legal entities, have already been discussed on internet resources without innuendo. we will dot above and together with competent guests. so what will change for taxpayers, we will definitely find out, and we will also consider the belarusian taxation system as a whole, how it looks against the background of the fiscal systems of foreign countries, is the updated one really more fair and what tasks for the country allow us to solve the taxes we pay? let's figure it out. today we have experts in the studio who are well versed in tax issues. and like everyone else, we pay taxes sergei nalivaika minister of taxes and dues of belarus sergei anyukhovsky member of the standing committee of the council of the republic on

economics, budget and finance director general of the kommunarka confectionery factory elena kireyeva first vice-rector of the belarusian state economic university doctor of economics professor, dear guests. good evening. hello taxes. it is an integral part of any state. they are very varied. we know this well, therefore we decided to divide our discussion into three conditional blocks, let's talk about taxes dedicated to individuals, highlighting a separate individual entrepreneurs and business entities. well, since we are meeting on the platform of the main television channel of the country , the most popular type of tax , the personal income tax, is of particular interest to us. everyone who receives income pays. so how much do people with incomes in the west pay and in which countries the figures are the highest answers to our next story, please. no matter how much

a person earns in most cases, it will seem to him that the tax burden in the country is not justified, it is high. it's natural, after all count their money, forgetting the public interest, is common to many, however, it is taxes that help not only maintain and develop the state, but also protect vulnerable segments of the population. the history of the tax system is also as old as civilization, the first documentary mention of tax collections was recorded back in the 18th century bc in babylon in the world, several approaches to calculating income tax are used. the most popular flat scale and progressive flat provides a fixed percentage from income. no matter how much an employee receives 100 dollars or 100,000, the tax rate is the same, such a scale is used , and when using a progressive scale, the tax rate depends on the income of a citizen, the

higher the income, the higher the percentage, so in sweden the minimum tax is 20% of earnings. and this is not the limit. the rate rises depending on the amount can reach 52%, in neighboring finland figures. even higher , almost 57%. the british have the lowest tax rates. is 20% for income up to £35.000 40 for income up to £150.000 and 45%. for even higher income. but france is considered a country with one of the most stringent tax systems, the french themselves constantly complain about the amount of their taxes, and some of them even run away to other countries and pay taxes there, but the main feature of the income tax in france is that it is taken to calculate , not a specific individual, and it is very unprofitable for a household in the country to be single and childless taxes will be as

high as possible when earning up to 26,000 euros per year , the tax rate will be 14% up to 72,000 30 everything above 153.000 euros 41%. but if the frenchman is rich, be kind enough to pay from 250 to 500. .000 euros 3% of the tax in addition to 500.000 euros four, but the famous tax on millionaires, according to which the state took away 75% of the income from the owners of income over 1 million euros. a similar system in the us taxes there also depend on the size of the family. true, the balances vary from 10 to almost 40%. the top 5 countries with the highest income tax include the divoire code. there, people give 60% of their income in

second place. finland almost 57% further japan and denmark have an income tax of almost 56% and austria closes the rating with 55% the figures are impressive, that is , people transfer up to 60% of their income in the form of tax, but sergey eduardovich and how does the taxation system for individuals look like in belarus and what changes in did it happen after the new year? well, you know, you absolutely rightly said that the income tax is just the tax that is the most massive, which applies to almost everyone who receives income. here's the big part. uh, tax law changes in the twenty-third year, they didn’t touch it at all, because we have an income tax rate. it has already been indirectly indicated here. it flat was 13% and is 13%. i want to pay attention.

which, by the way, is one of the lowest income tax rates. e in europe and if we take also those benefits and tax deductions that are provided e, in accordance with the law, then we estimated the income tax rate effectively and the so-called it drops below 11%, in general, if we take a side, and the change affected uh, this year. first of all , individual entrepreneurs. i mean income tax changes. and here , too, this is no super innovation, no surprise. in my opinion, this is a thing, to be honest, for a long time, announced that for individual entrepreneurs the taxation system will change from january 1, 23. we

have passed the next stage of these changes. and i think the most radical here and the most important is the most significant. probably this. hmm , the introduction of a new mechanism, the so-called tax on professional income uh-huh , that is, this is a digital platform, when any citizen who is engaged in those activities that are defined in the decision of the soviets. he can download this application to his gadget to reflect where you are in which he receives and his tax liability will be automatically calculated. well, in accordance with those terms. e, when the time for payment comes, it means that he will be obliged to transfer this payment, but you noted that from january 1, 23 , a special tax regime was introduced for the self-employed tax on professional income, but the column is dreaming. and what is its essence is the decree of the council of ministers. in accordance with which the list of activities is defined, and who

is engaged in these activities, they can use it, and the tax on professional income and there the person, the citizen, determines for himself, or he. uh, as a self-employed person, you correctly noted that he carries out this activity, or he registers as an individual entrepreneur and carries out this activity and pays income tax in generally established system of taxation. she, too, since january 1. mm is 20%, so it is easy for a person to sit down to count. which model of taxation is more profitable for him, which one we have to apply, but comparison, of course, of income tax rates abroad. yes, this is up to 60%, we heard in the republic of belarus yes, 13%, but, i beg your pardon. i just added, if we are talking about tax on income wires, then the rate there is generally 10%. uh-huh from the revenue reflected 10%.

there further. she is still splitting, part is coming directly as a tax payment, and part of this amount withheld. the social protection fund is in progress, that is, in parallel with the fulfillment of the tax obligation, the citizen also fulfills his social obligations , that is, there is no need for additional reports in the calculations not only to the tax authority, but also to the social protection fund in the ministry of labor, but in any case, uh, comparison of the tax burden on individuals, but it is in favor of our country. it is much lower with us and you said that it is an effective rate significantly lower due to those benefits and preferences that exist with sergei anatolyevich, we are, uh, going, uh, along the path, in fact, of abolishing certain, uh, tax benefits. there, including for individuals. i mean, uh, property taxes. e for individuals and a famous example from last year. yes, when it is necessary to pay

real estate tax already for the first apartment. tell us how these decisions are combined with the implementation of the principle. the range of justice, that's what's behind them. here the abolition of benefits is one of the factors implementation of social justice. and today one apartment or two apartments. there is an apartment you pay, there are no taxes for an apartment or a house. here you pay taxes and for everyone. uh, today's conditions, approx. here is the diagram of your shows. eh, the same and the amounts are relative. they are small on their own, i know that 40-50 rubles. here they are not some kind of amount that is objectionable, but uh, like a tax, the payer, like uh, the head of the enterprise understands that the larger the withdrawal, the fewer items in the budget are not covered by sources. eh, we're all used to walking. uh, to

school, to university, to a polyclinic, and we understand that all this needs to be maintained and, accordingly , less removed, and, uh. more budget revenue, but by and large. uh, these decisions are aimed at equalizing the conditions of taxation. well, in this particular example, for owners of apartments and private houses. yes, if you will, just add, here you are good. in my opinion, the sample was made on income tax, i am convinced that if you made a similar sample on e-tax for land real estate tax on the so-called property payments, the comparison was about the same in favor of our country, because well, let's call a spade a spade. after all, there are a number of countries in the same western europe, the so-called developed countries. yes, where real estate is relatively inexpensive and we see advertising to buy there, uh, you buy apartments at home, but when it comes to maintenance, including

tax obligations, the numbers there, of course, go off scale, i absolutely agree sergey anatolyevich, to say the least. about our country , the real estate tax rate for individuals is 0.1%. well, for the most part, it's about nothing. it is also the same regardless of the value of the property, and here i think you very correctly drew attention to social justice, for some reason a person who owns a house, uh, some uh, well, a simple ordinary small house, he was the payer of the object. uh, real estate tax, and the owner of one apartment is also the owner of this property. he didn't show up, therefore. eh, if we talk again here about taxation, you are correct. we just left. from this benefit, these conditions have been equalized and now all citizens of our country are in the same conditions or fedorovna . please tell us how you assess the state

of tax literacy of our people, and it is at a high level, or we still have something to work on, because here, getting ready to the transfer. uh, i had to read various sources, i got the impression that there, well, everyone is too literate, because they openly discuss tax avoidance schemes taxation is a criminal offense , we do not recommend doing this. so the state of tax literacy, whether we have high or low tax literacy, is generally a very interesting term, because tax literacy. this is not primarily about how to pay taxes and how we know how to pay. taxes, tax literacy are part of the tax culture. it's actually, uh, tax literacy. this is trust in the state. this is an understanding of their rights and obligations to taxpayers. yes in some part of studying tax law is included in tax literacy. well, we should say more that tax

literacy is an understanding and trust of the state understanding of tax policy, the tax system is that the taxpayer not only pays taxes, but also finances his own social programs and social guarantees. uh, now uh, tax literacy uh is, well, i would say already at such a serious level, because , starting from educational schools, there are optional lesson on tax literacy. e hmm, it is essential in this that the education system, starting from schools and secondary specialized institutions of higher educational institutions, takes a significant share or significant importance. uh, practically everywhere in the economic profile, not only in the economic profile. uh let's get to the study of taxation programs. but this is

such a qualifying component, as far as the general informational position is concerned, here it is unconditional. it's and that's what we're about to do is raise the tax literacy, this is an explanation on the websites of the ministry of taxes and duties of state bodies and information, the media are actively involved in certain explanations on tax legislation and on those services that apply, therefore, uh, tax literacy is not for those, how to evade taxes, tax literacy is about how to understand tax laws. in any case, uh, seeking to understand these issues are our people. yes, our neighbors have all the possibilities. there is internet there is a website of the ministry of taxes and duties, it is very informative, for example, there is all the legislation, the question, the answer, all the possibilities. for this there is. but, if

we complete the block of questions on the taxation of individuals and move on to individual entrepreneurs. here, sergei noted that there have been significant changes in the tax regime for individual entrepreneurs, but if consistently , this is the essence of these changes. well, if, uh, go in stages, then, probably, the most significant and hmm caused a stir, let's say business environment. this , of course, is the abolition of, uh, the simplified taxation system for individual entrepreneurs, and the reduction in the types of activities hmm for the payment of a single tax and the increase in this single tax rate for the remaining types of activities, that means here. eh, too, in my opinion, very predictable and consistent. the first thing i want to draw attention to is the simplified

taxation system and hmm single tax for individual entrepreneurs, these are special taxation regimes that were introduced temporarily so that businesses could to somehow develop to get on their feet and , as they grow, move on to the generally established system of taxation and not create unlawful tax competition for e large respectable economic entities. unfortunately for many years. and we observed that these special regimes were used not to get back on their feet, but to obtain, let’s say, unlawful tax advantages over bona fide business entities, so such a decision was made to first reduce the types of activities for individual entrepreneurs who can be carried out using a simplified taxation system, and starting from this year to get away from these types of activities altogether,

but in my opinion. again, this is not detrimental. e, economic entities they can either carry out, as i said, types of activities, or by paying taxes according to the general established system of taxation, if they fall under those types of activities that are determined by the councils of ministers, they can register as payers of tax on professional income or what's on in my opinion, the most correct way is to register a legal entity. and there they again, if the choice is either they can pay a simplified taxation system at a rate of 6%. or pay about e taxes according to the general established system of taxation. well, keeping track of income costs. uh-huh and all the other constituents we did the analysis. uh, 2.013, there was, uh, a reduction in the rate, uh, according to the simplified taxation system, a little bit in history, of course, but in a cone, but they were

reduced there. shops 7% to five and then a business union a number of business unions is all it was fixed that they undertook obligations that you would only lower these rates for us. we will create in a year we will create at least 20,000 jobs with a salary of 500 dollars, they kept their promise not no longer. eh, all these years, not a single year. no more create want to say from sole proprietors today. no wages 500 dollars average wages for individual entrepreneurs who applied the simplified taxation system 540 rubles. not dollars trying to evade undoubtedly. that is, when some interests are lobbied, promises are made, then they are not kept, like talking about social responsibility about politics. e about the ability to agree to comply with obligations, it must be noted that many individual

entrepreneurs. the simplified taxation system was abused, which often led to violations related to the cashing out of funds and tax evasion, the cash thus obtained was used, including to finance anti-state manifestations, on the other hand, such a tax regime was frankly preferential for individual entrepreneurs and it is time to grow out of short pants and start working in conditions in which all legal entities work, bear the full tax burden and social responsibility and the need to eliminate distortions and equalize tax conditions paid attention, our president. let's see here we have made a decision that pretty entrepreneurs should rise to the level above and how all the individuals and legal entities there persons to pay. taxes made such a decision , these exceptions are some individual entrepreneurs.

we looked at them and became bourgeois, uh, much more than those who today pull factories , let's say the same amkodor, and so on, compare with individual entrepreneurs, heaven and earth, so here we already have distortions. well, it is necessary to work in a civilized way, artisans will remain, who, uh , exclusively do something with their own hands and will sell at the price at which they can sell these are unique people whom we should be supported by artisans. we agreed to leave these, and all the rest must pay taxes, as expected. it's during this there period of time this year there yet. in a few months, we will bring this in line, they don’t offend anyone, the time has come and the simplified taxation system for individual entrepreneurs has been canceled

. tell me, does the ministry of taxes and duties monitor such decisions of individual entrepreneurs. now we can already say that they are flowing much more. what category of course, we, uh, control and analyze these flows. for us. this is extremely important and interesting and necessary. eh, it's another matter that you correctly say after a quarter, somewhere by the end of the month of april. we can give an objective picture. what happened, because after all it happens that a business entity as an individual entrepreneur during january determined which taxation system he would use. uh, we have a hmm taxation system, if we are talking about the general established when quarterly are filed declaration declaration will be filed in april. so after april 20th. we will see it, and then we will be able to count, let's say, this individual entrepreneur by the end of april. we already have a complete picture. which

of the individual entrepreneurs, which path did you prefer or fedorovna , please tell me, here you are, as a well-known scientific methodologist. yes, in the development of tax systems. do you see the risks. e departure of many individual entrepreneurs in the shadow sector of the economy. and what risks can be associated with such decisions? well of course, of course, a very interesting question is the shadow economy. it existed exists in almost all countries, regardless of the level of development of this country. and for some reason, we have, uh, thinks that, in general, the shadow economy. it is based on. uh, some kind of specific or russian taxation is nothing like that, that is, there is a certain category of people who will always look for ways to avoid taxes in the shadow economy. uh, more related to

problems, related and stationary development. uh, with the creation of bureaucratic barriers with the impossibility of acquiring certain goods and services, that is , taxes, of course, are present in this system and in some part of the business, including, what are you talking about, small business, it is still at risk. while it may be beneficial for him, but on the other hand, when it is created, a certain forgiveness, in particular. here, sergey eduardovich spoke quite a lot today about the tax on professional income. when, in principle, such a form is provided for individuals, the organization of the participation of tax authorities is practically, there are accounting for them for, uh, entrepreneurs on the part of the tax authorities, this simplifies tax administration, and we certainly understand that in some part, if an individual entrepreneur or

individual shares his risks, it is obviously easier for him not to deal with taxation at all, but to use the system that is currently more acceptable to him. and in particular, then the mobile application have a professional income. it allows you to take it off. uh, part of the labor for these individuals is to release them. actually speaking, these are the problems that they themselves would probably create if they started to go into some kind of shady business sergey anatolyevich, please tell me, here you are, as a senator, people certainly come to the reception. you visit regions and talk to representatives. e, enterprises and individuals, including individual entrepreneurs. tell people that they care, uh, questions about taxation about these changes that have taken place ask you these questions. and if people take it more widely, they understand these changes,

of course here. yes, i'm sorry sergeevich. i think something that is not in the top is definitely a question in the top housing and communal services of the road. this is what is top, but entrepreneurs often ask questions. i always ask in conversation. and how many years are you an entrepreneur and when a person says five to ten 15 tons in five years, uh, all the same, if he does not create conditions, then he will remain an entrepreneur , in fact, this is an artisan, as we call them today. and we have many examples in the republic when entrepreneurs from one store turned into a network structure for 10 for 15 years have grown from one hairdresser there are all these salons. eh, here, that is the one who grows. he, of course, will move on and find forms of ownership for himself today in order to conduct a decent business. and when, here you are in five and 10 years. he is one businessman there of one legal entity, a person of another legal entity, and already

raises doubts. is this one able to undertake or conduct honest business with the state compete with large enterprises compete in the market of the republic to compete outside the republic we are always questions that are here we ask the narrow address to them at the territorial service of the ministry of taxes and they already give a professional answer. we must understand very well that not everyone can be businessmen and entrepreneurs, of course, sometimes we are. unfortunately. after all , something does not work out for a person in business, and the tax system of the state is to blame. anyone else, but not him, but we must understand that this is hmm a rather narrow plast of people. this is a special category of people who are given to engage in gallant entrepreneurship. of course, therefore, here e. well, of course, it's easier to nod or shove someone there. uh, it's even easier to say that there is a bad tax system there, or someone else is to blame. sergey eduardovich approached a very interesting

question, very fair and timely , of course. we need to explain to our viewers. why the topic of tax changes is so actively promoted by separate information resources, we will call them destructive. that's what non-friendly forces are for. so they actively escalate the situation with a change in logos, and there is destruction. ip someone predicts how class and problems with the formation of the budget and the effects of sanctions against our country that people just do not come up with because there are simply no meaningful reasons for these panic moods. moreover, you are absolutely correct, because the tax issue is one of the elements that these destructive elements pull out and use. yes, that is, there are a number of others, but this topic is always hot hot. it is easy, as it were , warmed up, and, uh, with all

responsibility, i declare that the overwhelming for the most part, the meaning is distorted when this information is presented. hmm, therefore, that is , some things are not agreed upon, some things are deliberately held back. and here comes the negative. well, if once again , as an example, let's even take the same real estate tax, the taxation of apartments. hmm, for many years we have been saying again, the real estate tax rate for individuals, it is unchanged 0.1% but these 0.1% are applied to the tax base, that is, to the cost of one meter with an increase in value meters, but the tax itself is certainly growing, yes, but the rate itself does not change , but it’s always like this everywhere, but for some reason they pushed it out in our country, which means that with an increase there by eleven,

in my opinion, percent m-m of the cost of a meter square. it means that already ah -ah-ah guard, uh, real estate tax payments will also increase, which means that, firstly, i want to take this opportunity to say that in 2023 no real estate taxes will increase hmm, because the cost of one meter . it was accepted in 2020 the second year. we are all citizens who paid an advance payment for this apartment in part paid. last year, they will make an additional payment of 23, that is, that's why meters have risen in price. let's say. so the tax will go next in 2024. in fairness , if we talk about minsk, then even this is an increased cost, let's say, it is three times less than the market price. well, this is the one who carries the destructive. uh, there's an expression in muddy water, uh, fish is easier to catch, and so they create this one. e background for the fact that who creates the one who used the care from

taxes over the years and understanding today with the development of technology. it is becoming more and more transparent. well, and accordingly , although it is to continue the same regime that was 10-20 years ago, but we have already outgrown this regime a long time ago and have entered a completely different digital dimension, which allows you to track all this. well, again this traditional recommendation. you do not need to believe everything that is written in internet resources of dubious origin. there are official portals. there are official state the media have mp. the corps has a specialized specialist and there is an opportunity to find out something as part of the appeal of citizens, there are many options, so the information must be absolutely correct to speak from the point of view of communication in general. i have a purely personal opinion they will say about the communications of citizens with states with our state with government agencies. but, in my opinion,

such an already built system that some citizens are somewhere. even out of being abused. here i absolutely agree with you. there is such a wording, too, she went. i just understand from hmm media correctly information hygiene. well, what you are talking about is definitely understand who to listen to. what to listen to and in these aspects, i 'll be honest with him. maybe i'll deviate a little from the topic. uh, you have to listen to the president when you are talking even within the framework. i think my colleagues will agree with me. some informing you give simple examples about food security. he said when yes, somehow everything is so with bewilderment, can they buy us? well, go buy something else about the construction of a nuclear power plant, he said, well, who turned out to be right, provocative things, he said and turned out to be the whole world, and here are such moments. here you type, yes hmm, that's all, here, listen to the president. and you don't have to listen.

this one, uh, the whole stream, uh, blackmail or whatever it is ha ha, this is important information hygiene absolutely right, but the block of questions about individual entrepreneurs must be stated that changes in the taxation regime for our entrepreneurs. this is an evolutionary path to civilized work in modern conditions. and it's not spontaneous decision, but a balanced and thoughtful step. after all, we all have to adapt to the new requirements of the time, as it is to work in a new way and is marina romanovskaya really looking for answers. let's get a look. i realized that the moment had come to realize my own, as if nothing so small, to open my own business. well, i wanted something that would benefit people, and when i saw that we were opening a new shopping center because this is a chance , alexei easily remembers the preference for the path, he opened the coffee shop for regular visitors less than six months ago and did not lose the cozy place is popular in

the hometown of starting one's own business says, as in making coffee. the main thing is nothing not to miss working according to all the rules for boris with a legal education, the moment of principle, before. than to receive a subsidy from the state was trained further in the shock of knowledge. there on taxes on marketing, on many other disciplines. it helped a lot, then later on. i have already arrived with a ready business plan. i work as an accident and like any conscious, responsible citizen understand that this is our health, our roads and so on now, as well as this. customers as consumers they fool, so nothing new to me. everything is stable. since 2023, without any unnecessary fears, individual entrepreneurs have been working according to new rules for solving more than a one-time shortage of time in the past, the state orients entrepreneurs towards a civilized approach. this also applies to

trade and production, the result of work in the new format should be, first of all, simple and understandable conditions for doing business. important eliminate multiple taxation regimes. this allows you to increase the participation of small businesses, finance government spending and even out the burden on entrepreneurs of changes in taxation. this is not a reason to be afraid to develop your own business. for many years, anastasia has been confidently running her own retail store as an individual entrepreneur , and since this year she has not hidden even a cafeteria for children. not to miss the important , my mother had to scrupulously delve into the documents with a six-month-old daughter in her arms, it turned out to be under strength. that's really, really, who wants to always find a way. we want it to be a space where the whole family, both children and their parents, can have a good time. i want to work calmly and always when there are even

periods. i'm trying. on the very first day , a lot of individual entrepreneurs of some stores make everything deep, and everyone creates something that he knows how to do or he likes it, and you are just looking for profit. who has what interests, that's all working for the good. 100 products per day are capable of producing at this production site. the first machines were manual. now we have switched to high-tech equipment products - this furniture does not stay in the warehouse. the limited liability company cooperates with large internet sites, a high rate for business and a very real goal, if you work according to the rules , we participate in various tenders that allow us to increase our production. honestly, you always need to work in the market. we are in e. paying taxes is a problem. in general, i have not seen any more problematic. this is when the machines something

broke down not before the supply of raw materials there. that's the problem, and the problem is taxes. we don't see paying as it should be an issue. how it works further was not left unanswered with entrepreneurs, meetings are held across the country , seminars are organized, lectures, information about changes in legislation is available on the official website of the ministry of taxes and duties in social networks and instant messengers, and while some argue and comment on changes in the virtual environment. others earn real money. we see dear experts, that for respectable taxpayers, who sincerely love their country and want to do their own thing and earn money for their family. tax changes do not create problems, er, sergey eduazodovich. please tell me, turning to the question about the e-taxation regime for enterprises for large entities no. say that this year the

income tax increased by 2%. eighteen to twenty percent. and what is the reason for this and what other tax changes for enterprises? mm were accepted. well, you know, probably for the most part in this account, these are the main changes for legal entities that occurred in 1923 with what it was connected with in previous years, it was given the opportunity for local authorities to increase the income tax rate to 2%, so it turned out that three regions in our country they used this right and nevertheless looked, m-m did not come to the conclusion that, well, it would be more correct. if the bet is still the same. well, we have already decided to increase it to 20%. sergey anatolyevich, here's a question for you, as the head of a large factory large enterprise. please tell me,

how will the increase in the profit tax rate affect the parameters of the enterprise's performance, how will it affect selling prices for products? it will definitely not affect the selling prices in any way. here , as for the efficiency of the enterprise, well , not only through profit it is possible to evaluate the efficiency of the enterprise, there are a number of indicators that evaluate this as the enterprise's market share expands. what is the salary level. are taxes going up? income from this company? that is, what this enterprise gives to the republic for the school, it is a taxpayer, therefore, there is no increase in prices, but the rate of profit that the entrepreneurs have attracted, or you can watch it at the expense of proceeds and think about how to increase the revenue of enterprises, if you need a rate of return, if we are talking about efficiency, then even more show or

efficiency calculations. now has changed. and that's the meaning to me, he is very impressed if the enterprise does not develop, that is, it does not invest depreciation. respectively, it will pay more taxes if the enterprise develops and returns depreciation to the development of the enterprise, but, according to the calculation of consolidated efficiency, it will pay less taxes. well, i also want to add that income tax is not a pricing tax. and when we talk about the fact that the profit will be increased by 2%. this can in no way affect the price of the price. we have something completely different. e, influences supply and demand, first of all, the establishment of price regulation for individual goods the number of towels paying income tax we do not have much. uh, the main share of the entrepreneurial segment. we paid, just a simplified tax system and special taxation regimes

for individual subjects. e paid, well, other types of tax payments, that is, income tax. this is basically a tax for large entities . there is no economy. first of all , state forms of ownership or commercial entities that have a significant market share and occupy a significant market share. yes definitely the subject may lose part of the profit, but at the current moment, except for the established rate in the amount of s, 93 23 years in es. 20%, we see that the income tax benefits that they have retained, in general, the entire list of expenses that a business entity can attribute to reduce taxable profits. he's not hardened. uh, we understand that there are no more standardized expenses, which for the formation of a tax on profits, that is, some other conditions

that significantly changed the activities of these economic entities. it didn't happen sergey anatolyevich well, i can't help but ask you questions from our editorial group. when you deserved all of them in connection with the republic and accepted these tax changes, you didn’t have an internal conflict. you, as a senator, and you, as the head of an enterprise, are not confident that neither i nor my colleagues. look at the republic, they are all state people and think in terms of states and patriotic. we all understand that the filling of the budget depends on the social services that the state provides to our citizens. and if i'm sorry, a forgetful expression. the wallet will be empty, then you won’t get it from it and you won’t finance this or that event, therefore, of course, there were no such doubts and voted plus. eh, i repeat, as leaders. i understand how each article

is formed and, accordingly, there are many other mechanisms to adapt to changing conditions. well, completing the block of questions about key tax changes. uh, i propose to see a short plot of olganishchenko's resume specifically for economic environment. the tax code, of course, is not at home and interest rates and approaches in general, if there is a strong argument, the code reacts with amendments. frankly speaking, there have been a lot of such things since the new year for both individuals and businesses, but all this is not only for the sake of fiscal tasks. let's figure it out. why so , let's start with perhaps the loudest know-how of 20-23 professional income tax - this is generally a novelty. it is offered to self-employed citizens who do their own small business with the right not to register an individual entrepreneur by itself without employees. in a word for individuals. and yes, it was suggested that this is not an obligation. you can stay on the single tax as before, but the new mechanism is just