accordingly, there are many other mechanisms to adapt to changing conditions. well, completing the block of questions about key tax changes. uh, i propose to look at a short plot of olga anishchenko's resume specifically for the economic environment. the tax code, of course, is not a dogma and interest rates and approaches in general, if any. the code reacts with amendments from the new year , frankly speaking, there were quite a few of them both for individuals and for business, but all this is not only for the sake of fiscal tasks. let's figure it out. why so let's start with perhaps the loudest know-how 20-23 tax on professional income. this is generally new. it is offered to self-employed citizens who do their own small business with the right not to register an individual entrepreneur by itself without employees. in a word, for physicists. and yes, it was suggested that this is not an obligation. it is possible to remain on the single tax as before, but the new mechanism is simply convenient when you download the application quickly. true

income you contribute the amount of income. yes, perhaps all reporting will not allow our citizens calmly simply fulfill tax obligations without any unnecessary administrative, because all interaction will be based on a remote digital procedure, starting from registration of the calculation. the monologue of paying the amount of tax no e, declarations and so on represent nothing to anyone requires confirmation of the order of 20.000 fi. zlitsky, the tax regime for the month, realizing that they will pay 10% of their income. and if the income is solid and all 20, but this was emphasized by a voluntary decision in his favor, by the way, the insurance premiums of the social protection fund for the future pension, including in this tax, they are already included and this is important insurance for the future and then the tax lays down the key principle of justice because of this, including the tax explanation, explaining why the transformation of

approaches is important and necessary to taxation for small businesses precisely from the income received, respectively, if the income was not received on the payment of tax, this is a great advantage compared to the single tax, which required the payment of tax on period before reading activities, the payer. could not assume the income received or not, but here there is no income. there is no obligation to pay tax, as for natural persons, the tax on the first apartment of the order has increased. percentage was an increase. the fact is that the estimated cost per square meter in different settlements has changed , and it has pulled up the total amount. in any case, you will have to pay under this scheme next year, then the land tax rates increased and for the population for business a single tax for individual entrepreneurs and individuals who do not switching to professional income, the amount is also raised , different depending on the type of work, the income tax rate also grew by 2%. the budget is always focused on social spending, medicine , social education, support, this is the rule, without

exception, for understanding spending on healthcare from the new year. grew 12%, education plus nearly 12 implementation of social policies. plus 17. moreover, only these three areas make up almost a fifth of the expenditure part of the budget, and all these figures are interest on something , it is impossible to do this without raising the rates. we all want we are even sure that doctors will come to our call and serve us in the clinic. the children will definitely go to school, and their parents or our grandmothers will be given pensions, allowances, and so on , they will definitely do it. it's on time. yes, sometimes there are some mistakes on the ground, but the system has been working for decades. and our taxes will not open america - this is a guarantee that it will always be so. but there are still large state investment programs for new medical institutions, for example, this is laid down right here, this is also a construction budget. not only housing burrows, security and national defense. finally, these costs. it's not a secret. have grown noticeably. we all understand why and

even for individual entrepreneurs this year the simplification was completely canceled, leaving only two general tax regimes. this is a 20% income tax. and the single tax simplified system was, by and large, a benefit for businesses of abusive masses with one clear goal of minimizing tax payments , they know this, so by and large. changes are overdue, well, or simply in full swing, this is the people's version of the ministry's forecast our business will no longer achieve for the sake of tax savings, creating a lot of individual entrepreneurs and will go into more organized forms, legal entities, as it should be in status and justice. lena fedorovna but if we look at our tax system as a whole. here are the macroeconomic functions it performs. well, in other words, why do we pay taxes. what state tasks are solved in this case? there are two taxes -

regulatory and fiscal. but if you say it in such a way that it is probably understandable. and now the main function is to provide economic security of the state of its stability macroeconomic stability and taxes in this way. e form this airbag. give the opportunity to carry out all planned projects. not only social projects, economic projects allow us, uh, to function in such a rather complex turbulent world. here, providing its citizens, its population, its enterprises, its business entities. with this particular revenue base, and certainly what we also said today, taxes fulfill regulating functionality. that is , we can choose that direction. e economic, which is more priority at the moment. we can

support certain business entities. uh, in order to direct financial flows through tax incentives in some direction that is also interesting, so i will repeat it again. uh, macroeconomic stability ensuring the economic security of the social guarantee. this is what is directly or indirectly performed by tax payments. our opponents often reproach the belarusian tax system that it is cumbersome and that tax rates are too high. although, in fact, it turns out that this is not the case, but if you look at it, in general, how it looks against the background of the fiscal systems of other states. of course, i run the risk of being biased, but i am absolutely convinced that our system is absolutely competitive at the level of the most developed countries and to say that it is somehow superfluous, cumbersome or superfluous. backup i definitely wouldn't uh,

not enough. in which tax code in the world the principle of good faith of the taxpayer is spelled out, we have it, and therefore, let the spiteful critics take it for the sake of interest. they'll just look. this is one thing in terms of rates. we also looked and compared even briefly so, and in terms of control pressure or function. i gave examples that were reduced by a multiple. uh, this is a load, and today those, uh, automated system and databases that we have, they allow us to work very precisely and identify only those subjects or those citizens who really consciously intentionally violate tax laws. our tax burden is slightly more than 26% at the moment. this, of course, without the social protection fund, but you can say this is what sergey darvi was talking about.

that it is unquestionably competitive, uh, in comparison with other states , even up to the state with which we are in a single conditional bloc, if our tax system is now acquiring a service character as a union state. we keep saying, uh, digital services. what is this service providing taxpayers , uh, conscientious taxpayers , u with additional services, that is, taxes become reduced by the tax office and reduces this, uh, uh functionality of fiscalization, and directs more to opportunity. uh, service providing some extra benefits. we started talking about what is also a tax on professional income, which sits on a mobile platform. this is, strictly speaking, the state's assistance to the taxpayer so that he can organize it in this way. that is

he no longer needs tax consultants for small businesses, he can safely count on the help of the state , which, on his own, will take and collect taxes for him, that is, in fact, we are talking about , well, such digitalization, yes, that is, electronic services are included in our tax life. please tell us when we will be able to switch to full digitalization of e- tax administration. well, you know the question, of course, such an interesting one. hmm, we have such a task, it is set by the head states, and we are ready for the tax system. it probably won't be modest. e more than many are ready for digitalization. even in some part more than the subjects of economic citizens. e, but unfortunately , but this automation and the transition to digital largely depends on how relevant the information resources of the database that we use, because, well, i’ll give you an example. all of a fairly

high quality information that the state traffic inspectorate provides us with for calculating transport tax. here, unfortunately, there we have problems with, uh, calculating land tax on real estate, they are being resolved, but , unfortunately, as quickly as we would like, therefore, given that there is a very large segment and circle of these information bases with which we interact, it is extremely important for us so that these bases are up-to-date, so that they are reliable, but on our part. well, there is readiness, and we see how we need to move. uh, i can present it like this, probably the next one. hmm, the stage that we are setting for ourselves. payment. that is, it will not be necessary to pay separately for one property for land tax, but transport tax. that is, it will be possible to pay a citizen in one payment by pressing one button. it is very comfortable. very convenient sergey cooking can not help but ask you. insight exclusive information

for the economic environment, should we expect any major changes in tax legislation in the near future? and if so, what are these innovations that are in demand in the country today, or we have already perfected the tax system. well there's nothing ideal, therefore it is firstly, secondly, life dictates. it was right in your story that it was said somewhere that the tax code is not a dogma, but it changes, in accordance with how the world is changing. if we talk about the position of the ministry of taxation, i think my colleagues will agree with me. we are in favor of stability, and i think, i am convinced that an increase in the receipt of payments should be sought on the path of expanding the tax base, they are on the path of raising the tax rates themselves. that is why the ways we

we are moving on what we discussed today, and there is also a departure from part of the benefit. this is just the same expansion of bass taxation in order not to raise rates. therefore, i think, i am convinced that if everything goes on like this , everything will be stable as we plan, then there will be no such sudden movements, but what -something there, well, i don’t know polishing, but this is life dictates, so i have already said something and i think you will agree with me. what are you talking about, these decisions are not being made widely, there is a discussion economic entities are involved in this process, citizens, so this is not some kind of classified information, so well , i don’t see such global prerequisites for any radical changes. today, i summarize our conversation. dear colleagues. you have the opportunity to contact taxpayers. and once again focus on the most important aspects. and so

taxes are a burden or tools for solving common problems sergey a, well, it depends, of course, on a person’s attitude to this issue. is it a burden or a tool, therefore, i i take the opportunity. i would like to wish everyone, of course, good peace, peace of mind, confidence in the future. i want to wish prosperity and wealth, as it may not sound unusual, and i want to assure that no one wishes taxes more sincerely than a tax official - this is responsibility. our civil social responsibility is both a citizen and an enterprise that operates in the market and we are competitive in the export market. so this applies to many. this is russia and many enterprises in our republic. we are competitive in other markets. a, accordingly our tax system. she is competitive. here you are such a back, how the production workers from the real sector did

the level of tax literacy determines the level of civilized society. we all want to live in a civilized society, so i am for tax literacy. thank you for your opinion, we thank our guests and say goodbye to you. live through and pay taxes and then the economic environment will be favorable for you, goodbye.