there is something in this store. yes, i really like beets, sausage, theirs is very tasty. why does he come to this particular store? and they have a good range. everything here is always very tasty. they have veal sausages. those are long, straight legs that i have tried, everyone says it's very tasty. what else did they take, what else did they take lard , be sure to lard. salo pork brisket salty, well, in general, awesome just melts, grodno pinsk brest minsk does not even visit belarus, primorye people know our cities well, they recently tasted our factories at taste, molodechno and slonim in general, you can only imagine our dumplings, frozen potato pancakes and brest milk ice cream being transported to the far east. see ours. well, milk. in general, it’s like, damn it, here in belarus there are glazed cheese curds, and with different fillings.

this is a sharp plant. we alone sell them in primorye and they are both cheap and tasty, and buyers are usually attracted. this is, kobrin is widely represented by the famous melted terms of the circus, a lot of desserts, and yogurt. for example, local sour cream is not here , neither in krasnodar, nor in other cities, i couldn't eat. i just couldn’t, it’s just a completely different taste and that’s all and some of our customers. they say that butter is just your cheese of some kind. we don't buy any more. meat. dairy daily delivery of sweets, apples, alcohol every 2 weeks and five stores of the belarusian farmer in vladivostok, two more in nakhodka . what are our queues in kamchatka for? and, by the way, if we need it, after all, there are analogues of the departed squirrels in vladivostok

, the american brand has replaced belarusian products belarusian farmer exclusively only belarusian farmers. well, behind everything else, other stores, namely, goods directly of the first necessity, milk cheese is all belarusian. from brest to vladivostok belarus, russia showed the whole world what such integration means, wait, president putin and i will show it, as i have already said. listen to the youth. you and i will show them how to make a press, which recently celebrated its millennium and vladivostok will turn only 163 in the summer, despite the difference in age. we have so much in common there at 10,000 km. there is even a fortress and built it, like the legendary

hero-general dmitry karbyshev of brest, more and more , uh, primorye residents want to get to the republic of belarus; recently, the children returned, delighted with the trip to the republic of belarus, uh, conveys very, but rave reviews. i think this is the direction. maybe we will even develop charters there, so that our children, uh , know, uh, the republic of belarus, which is close to us. subsequent youth, and patriotic education is also very important, because it was belarus that experienced all the horrors of nazism for children. well, it’s clear what is aimed, what is a fascist, so these are also lessons of courage. e of these defenders, brest and, e, those partizan then fought those who liberated in the next it turned out that vladivostok does not have a single twin city. as you understand, they can become a brest region delegation by the summer, visiting primorsky krai, in general , there are such close warm relations between us,

that there are already visits for every quarter. together with our guides, you will learn something that you would never have guessed to google, one of the most famous names of the belaya vezha tower , although in its history it is white. she never was. by the way, who didn’t know this particular tower is depicted on the 5 ruble banknote of the legend, historical facts and many unusual sights, the destination when an arrow or a spear gets here. they slide off, change direction, and so on , the warrior's face is under more reliable protection. and i

thought it was also a weapon method. this is possible in a head-on collision, indeed. such a blow was allowed, walking along the embankment you can meet a lot of curious or legendary characters jack sparrow oh sorry captain jack sparrow a trip that will remain in my memory for a long time the first time i see a bison. by the way, they were born this year and don’t watch it on belarus 24 tv channel. belarusian memorial complexes at the weakening of the fact that one should not forget nicoli khatyn, good luck for a lunge was from the improject of yakiya peralza show-inji. it's in the image verme-symbolic and i, as on my verme -good swear, that yong is not nato naturalistically, svetka and dagestul unknown details of the withering of people's popniks, carried out

the state budget nerds, then the memorial was hung with a komsomol construction site. here intertwined perch trends. the cycle of the memory of my land is such a populist, and remember, the history of one carriage is the history of all the people. millions of emotions we can rejoice, be angry, be surprised, be sad. this

emotional force literally takes back, and has already hit us. she becomes indispensable the puzzle of life, because the secret of music is that it finds an inexhaustible source of expression, where speech stops music instead of a thousand.

hello, i would like to wish our viewers to get comfortable, the excellent composition of experts in this issue. i welcome our guests. thanks for taking the time. and i also know the second part of the program in touch, russian public figure sergey kruginyan. so what awaits you and me, a conversation full of meaning today, security is the number one question from this. and we will start on monday alexander lukashenka held a meeting with the new general secret of the dkb, let me remind you that belarus is chairing the organization this year, but i would like to start with this fragment. if someone thinks that the conflict between ukraine and russia is not our conflict, that we will sit quietly somewhere, nothing like this

will happen. eh, the time will come, it is not far away literally. here it is tomorrow, when this time will require to be determined to take a certain position. i'm not saying it's to the detriment of the national ones. interest and so on, well, with all our allied shortcomings. us you will have to clearly define your policy and your line in order to act . i suggest, probably, and your experience was pushed together together, it is always easier such a frank and honest message to our partners in the accident, as you think, everyone heard. first, let me tell you what, from my point of view, the head of our state proceeded from when he sent this message. i think that it came not so much from an appeal to solidarity to some moral feelings. how much he spoke the simple truth that

it is impossible to ensure security alone in the modern world, if we draw a historical analogy , then the thirties of the 20th century, uh, were somewhat reminiscent of the current situation, and the ussr urged by all means to create a unified security system in europe, if it were created, then the wehrmacht’s general staff would hardly lee would have decided on such an adventure, because he understood that the united forces of europe of the soviet union were much larger, but they preferred to sit out in their national apartments. somewhere they played their games, they got what they got, and today we have a situation similar to it is necessary to unite in order to meet those challenges, and you are for naturally, close to the third world war to the beginning of the third world war in order to find the challenges to give an adequate answer, what else do i want to say about this to our partners in the csd, you need to understand, uh , a simple thing, that the goals of the collective west are not small countries

in the post-soviet space, their real goals are russia and china as major geopolitical competitors and they hit these goals using such a favorite method anglo-saxon geopolitics, creating a loop of anaconda well, that is, along the perimeter, creating a hostile environment and suffocating in this hostile environment, unleashing conflicts on the borders. uh, they set up military bases there, provoking chaos, which will inevitably spill over into uh, the territory of russia, and there will be chaos, including among the partners in the csd, who will limit with russia in this sense , i want to emphasize my point again, and security. not for someone not for someone else's uncle. this is for yourself, for your people, and only together. we can do it secure alexei well, there really is something involved. now we will see that last year was such a test of independence , first in kazakhstan, then we saw the armenians and the azerbaijani conflict, where it is very difficult, of course, for us the situation is on the one

hand. armenia is the members of the dcb on the other hand, azerbaijan is such a traditional one for us, and a big partner. here it was very important not to aggravate the presence of an accident, that is, understandably, not to resolve the situation. there the task is different, but from the point of view of hearing this message that was voiced in minsk in monday. as you see it, you know, we still have to understand that in reality the tkb is a union of sovereign states. and those who are fighting against us are large corporations, industrial banking corporations and they have an a plan for the next 15 years. this is the destruction of sovereign states. uh immerse them, and in a state of chaos. e. the complete destruction of any constitutional system of any government agencies of law enforcement agencies, uh, and. e. hmm, the immersion of the population is just such a very, er, severe socio-economic crisis. and when the president says that, uh, this challenge will come tomorrow, the challenge is just related to

the confrontation of sovereign states with these corporations, if we do not resist, and we alone will definitely not be able to resist their huge, and their assets e money supply, but together we can resist and save our world, and most importantly, keep the world in order. eh, completely different. not the one that a large corporation is trying to impose now , i will suggest to the national elites of these countries those who own large capitals, because that the russian roughly showed that these young capitals, no matter how big they were , they were the same. double players in the big arena, they quickly each have their place, so save your capital when you go beyond your national jurisdiction, if you are not a sovereign, it is extremely difficult, perhaps this is also a call to the fact that times have really changed now igor do you think but let's do it with our opponents and even i would

name the enemies. here is. in general, what our country has a little less hmm is unity. with all that, of course, there in the west they also swear about how many weapons to supply e to ukraine and how does anyone see the fighting from the point of view of national interests, but is there any single thing there? and, if such unity on our part, even if they hear it and so on, may be coming, then the time, perhaps alexander grigorievich is talking about this, is when there is reason to revise the list of participants in the collective security treaty, maybe include someone new, and there are many who want it, because countries he understands that he can cope with the western threat alone, but it is impossible, maybe some countries wish. uh , leave this union, because from a military point of view, yes, and a political economic one . it is very important to feel that your partner will be with you in any situation, but about

leaving. yes, we are now in the chairmanship, knowing the style and spirit of belarus and in particular alexander lukashenko what is called not leaving on my shift? yes, i agree here, but a matter of public discussion. perhaps already so long enough overdue. here is how organization that can, uh, well, not declarative, but really working to do. what decisions should be made so that this organization still gains political and military weight even more to the level for which it was planned, and two petrovich from a military point of view, as military experts. yes, we heard, after all, another very important settlement, despite the fact that the context is now the most unfavorable and one could refer to it and say that well, let's postpone until better times the solution of some tasks that can be tolerated, but belarus has become the chairman and the president said this and i will quote, but they have faced the most difficult task, for example, here i am. hmm, i will repeat the words of the president. we took the risk during our presidency to try to solve these problems that we have, and the caucasus and

central asia we have problems there. let's try to resolve them and, as far as possible , unite the organization. hmm, a difficult task, but it is doable, in general, now this year , or we just start this path, and then we will continue to apply it. you understand, this is most likely there, that the most important message that the president wanted to say is, in theory, as if everyone understands that yes, if we are all together, we are much stronger, well, in practice, everyone tries to pull the blanket over himself anyway, firstly, if we say about dkb - this is quite such, well, an organization that is geographically very strong, well, it is located practically in the eurasian region, so, accordingly, what worries countries, for example, central asia worries less, well, for example, belarus well, and vice versa, what today the day is going great. this is understanding and talking about the fact that you won’t have to serve time. here you need, the main thing is to understand at what stage

you won’t have to serve time, because each of the republics of the state security committee members perfectly understands what it means to support a special military operation today. it is to immediately fall under the ax for the collective west, these are immediately harsh sanctions, which, moreover , cover all the spectrums of the absolutely vital activity of the state, both external and internal, and, accordingly, any state is ready for this. and most importantly, we need to understand, really. do we really need those states that are really directly involved in this or that degree in this armed conflict. i mean the republic of belarus the russian federation do we need in this we are talking a lot of hybrid warfare. that is , today's actions are largely based on indirect actions, so we are limited in obtaining some modern technologies. we are limited in obtaining some resources that we do not have, maybe perhaps we have the opportunity to receive these resources through these countries. maybe this is not a direct military assignment. maybe it will be

just dual-use or civilian use. there we will figure out how good luck to attach it. maybe it really is. this is the exit exactly there, which allows us to get around, including males. well , as for the actual use in terms of military force, well, by and large, the military did not need a lot of political will in order to unite us. well, as the events in january have shown , in january of last year we will need a little time for this, about one to three days, so that we can organize this organization and our main forces. first of all, the collective forces brought into action and efficiency. i think you've seen it all. that is why it is unequivocal to say that we really need to unite today and oppose the collective west, or we still need to find other entrances and approaches in order to influence this west process, indeed the president's message was

indeed made. not just correct, but he was still later and argued by all of these in his words. it is connected , we really need to decide who at what stage will really enter, let's move on then there was another guest in minsk whose visit to the belarusian capital caused serious irritation in the west. of course, i mean hungarian foreign minister petrosiat. not only that, on the eve of shifts on the eve of his arrival in minsk, he dared to call the european parliament one of the most corrupt organizations in the world. so here in minsk, with a belarusian colleague, he says that sanctions are being discussed incorrectly on peaceful tracks in ukraine . they agreed on a cooperation program for the whole 23 year, which is the main thing you see in the arrival of the hungarian minister. all of them tried to find some kind of symbols. yes, symbols, symbols , moreover, the head of the foreign ministry, tak, indicated that his

visit would definitely cause sharp criticism from the outside. ah, european countries, uh, anglo-saxon, like a glomerate, but uh, the question is what is it then we will continue to pursue exclusively our national interests, if it’s beneficial for us, and it’s beneficial for us, well, hungarian, to be friends with belarus, first of all, you are the economy in production, but we will do this, and we, in principle, don’t care about your annoyance. and that's just such an independent. uh, the position is independent politics and annoying they don't u obey brussels. they obey said a number of countries a number of ministers. er, what is the question? but the head of the mida, he is also the head of the foreign economic department, then there is its main task, including the solution of economic issues and the question arises. and hungary did not support the sanctions policy. and the european union actually receives e

resources at better prices, can cooperate from belarus with russia with other countries of the eurasian space and thereby solve their national economic problems. they have lower inflation, and neighboring countries also work for production. naturally, they look. the most important thing is the common people, the simple workers, they look and say, and then what happens to our politicians? betrayed, and these national politicians are selected. and-and his people and observes it is his interests. they're interests there, uh america and uh, some corporations. well, this is more, of course, something that concerns such hungarian interests. yes, sure. on the e-e of hungary, with this visit of the shining one to minsk , it turned out to be pluses in this european field from the other side. no matter what, but what is it for us? it is clear that the head of the foreign ministry, like any diplomat, will not say everything publicly. in general, he, in my opinion, in his comments after the visit. i said that

somewhere, some meetings were public , some were not public, it is important for us that this is a visit, and a person of high position from europe is such a first sign. after all, many want to normalize relations with belarus and russia, but so far it has not been collectively accepted and it is always more difficult to be the first. and the one who will be a locomotive and will first collect all some kind of negativity about the fact that it’s impossible and impossible to work with belarus well , that’s good, but art came to minsk after that. surely some other political e, european players will come to minsk with great pleasure because they want to work with belarus to communicate with belarus. but they were afraid of this criticism, now the hungarians will take all the bumps and then it will be a little easier for everyone else. i think that ours is for our european diplomacy, which one way or another continues to exist and exist well, because there are behind-the-scenes negotiations, not public ones, but for our public pro-western diplomacy - this is a very good starting

signal, hungary in general, she's in the european family is such a white crow. we saw how now, during the summit in e, in the eu , everyone ran applauded, hugged, kissed zelensky, while urband defiantly kept aloof. it was visible. he emphasized it. i would also like not to say on this topic. i would agree with aleksey alekseevich that here the fault line runs along the e, criterion, national anti-national elites, serve their people, serve as foreign masters. but what else can i say? i can point out a few things, firstly, hungary hard enough distance. from the cultural policy that is taking place in the european union from that bacchanalia, bacchanalia that is happening, i'm talking about gender policy , about this cultural policy in general, or better to say the antips of pseudo cultural policy, there are strong

catholic roots. eh, the hungarian people, they do not allow us to take the path of dehumanization. uh, on the way to the destruction of their european national culture, the second thing i want to note, but this is probably such a strong statement, but due to the fact that now everyone is watching very closely, and who will ultimately win the conflict in ukraine, my deep conviction that the conflict in ukraine is yes, and everyone understands this, this is not a local conflict, this is a reformatting of the world, the geo-structure of the world. and if you join the winner, you can then reap the laurels, er, the winner, and i think that they take this moment into account and put it. betting on e russia on belarus as an ally and russia in this e conflict. uh, i want to emphasize again, and there will be a redistribution following the results of this war. eh, peace, by at least in european. eh, the continent and hungary are fully aware of the fact that now it is necessary to look, er, and er, into the future from this

angle of vision. well, at the same time, we are . at least i noted that urban was in no hurry. hmm, to show zelensky's special feeling. but in the meantime, welcome. it was very warm, uh, both in the uk and in. brussels in general, this visit of zelensky is real. you expect it to bring some real change on the battlefield or some kind of ritual history. i'm not, i'll explain why the fact is that an important premise for my thesis is that the elite of the collective west still retained colonial thinking. they do not see zelensky as a partner, as an equal figure. this is a servant, this is a colony. it is impossible to have a conversation with the servants and it is not necessary to have a conversation on an equal footing; they must know their place. and the fact that they play these games. he arrived there, hugged him there , and so on. it's uh, the audience. i am sure that they will have completely different conversations, but from their national interests, if they pursue them at all, and, most likely, from those

indications that they turn out to be small will give. well uh. now. i think the following is weighed. that is, are they ready to become a participant having already thrown off their masks, they are practically already thrown off. well, it honestly depends. well, we are the parties to the conflict, and the solution to this issue will depend on specific decisions. will they give planes? uh, will there be other types of weapons that can radically turn the tide on the battlefield? they tried to say that they just supply these weapons, but they are involved in conflicts, but this is ridiculous. that is, it is not clear how far away a person needs to be in order to from information, in order to believe in it, here is stoltenberg. uh, he said, a very important thing is to create an even stronger army in ukraine after any end of the current conflict. that is, this suggests that it may not even be only a colony, that is, this is a permanent military hot

spot, a statement by stoltenberg, who, well, as they say, does not spare words for today day in a relationship. he really is. e has such a character. uh, like maintaining this fire in the hearth of this confrontation. and today nato has taken such a position, they will give both planes and tanks, but only in those quantities that are necessary to maintain this conflict in order to try to destroy russia from the inside, because from the outside to destroy the state that has the strongest world nuclear potential is impossible, therefore, it is precisely the emphasis that is placed on the destruction of russia from the inside and, most importantly, how they went about this destruction from the inside. they took the path of not using the liberals today, who by and large do not have any weight against the background of a special military operation to raise patriotic feelings, and they

rely today on patriotic-minded people and prolonging the conflict, the uncertainty of the action will lead to namely, that the patriots, as in february of the seventeenth year , can, as they say, rise against the existing government, and this cannot be allowed. although it is precisely with regard to nato itself that it is necessary to take a look at their military strategy, what they expect from us is some kind of mitigation. until 2030, it is clearly spelled out for them and for the first time that in what is what in the us national security strategy that in strategy 2.000 until 2030 nato for the first time spelled out the republic of belarus where it is clearly defined that they are concerned about human rights in our country, which are allegedly violated and secondly, that belarus is one of the countries that interferes with the entire world order in europe. that is, what they have prepared for us is clear, is anyone visible will not talk to us here on the mind. even such words come. you know, in the background, bent

and gingerbread, when they were said by one famous. uh, a ukrainian politician who said promise them anything you want, and we'll hang them later. therefore, nato politicians must be treated very, very carefully about their time remarks. uh, really different moods about zelensky’s visit , we saw on the one hand such a spectacular tour, uh, and macrons, scholz met with karl the third, but here’s what news week writes for example, this is one of the authoritative publications of a tour of europe that showed zelensky's despair, and the author of this article, brandon call , claims that zelensky is falling into despair - this is the consciousness that a meeting with european politicians does not give results. that is , what the ukrainians might have counted on, whom zelensky should have represented, that is, there is such a place there. we have something very significant, for example, with all these european tours. this is actually, madam, tikhonovskaya who , when this movement with european

trips. here is her constituency. e was happily clapping his hands. let's live now. now they will help us all with something. and so on. here is zelinsky, because plus or minus repeats exactly the same path of tikhonovskaya, this immediately causes a wow effect in the audience. that's where tikhanov's zelensky and the european audience, which watches, observes the principles of democracy, the joy of victory over e, russia and russians, and so on, and then after some time, a thought immediately appears about zelensky's tikhanov's electorate. well, it’s good that we traveled and that, as it were further what does it affect nothing, then already the europeans have exactly the same thoughts , well, it came again, but first it. and now, when we are talking about zelensky, zelensky has arrived again and that he is again asking for money, and what's next? that is, this is an internal irritation. it seems to me, but hmm, on the one hand, our opponents. they are trying to absolutely agree irritation within us within the union state, but at the same time , some steps of the collective west, it

seems to me, still cause much more irritation to their audience in europe because well, zelensky, and now the topic of ukraine is fed up, and it is artificially again trying to be in the top, there are absolutely readers of the daily mail very harshly criticized. let's listen. now why is he even here this is not a british conflict. we must not interfere in this. we're giving british taxes to a telecomic hate-monger. why? of course, the establishment will help him. already made the decision to keep taking classes instead of finding a way out. please note, i will not die on the advanced principle of such a european, and, unfortunately, politics is such a frank conventionism, and then it will all go over to the political field and it’s immediately fashionable for your electorate and to maintain , well, status and power, uh, praise zelensky and say that we should stand up for ukraine in a conflict with russia after some time, more and more fashionable, and in e for the population there are

other theses. zelensky is not needed. i need to help ukraine why are we doing this. why do we spend a lot of money and the same people. you have some time that they shouted that let's help zelensky. they with exactly the same zeal they will shout that everything is enough, we spent too much money. why is he coming, because this is just such a european political situation, but here is the most important thing to add. we even see from the faces of european politicians, not zelensky, that indeed they are all at an impasse. they don't know how to get out of it. they can only do. this show he can come there several times a day several times there to call to do. uh, program show, but it's not really decides. the main problem is theirs. they wanted to destroy through ukraine, as it was correctly said , somewhere within a year or two, and lead russia to protests, and the collapse of the russian economy, even after russia

would be conditional on them. and naturally , they could not achieve this further to deal with china. yes, russia was able to mobilize, huh? the integration association, including the union state, could unite, yes, uh, we host a military group, and they are already forced to play this theater of the absurd to the end, but they do not really know the way out of it. they will continue to focus only on escalation, because as soon as they stop the whole world. and most importantly, global investors. here they will sit for coffee and laugh at them very much, because they lost, but everyone else started. and what should zelensky do, and in any case, he will rise sometime , regardless of how the conflict in ukraine ends, somehow relate to the words of truly ukrainian , hmm, representatives, here, in particular minister of foreign affairs kuleba, who, here, says on february 23-24 the anniversary of the beginning of his life

is expected to quote great events that russia will remember. well, uh, on the one hand , you can't say that they're not preparing something , you can't treat it with some kind of humor and say, nothing will happen. it is clear that zelensky and his entire team are pr people. this means that they will prepare some kind of action of the first action, a provocation, where it will shoot on the territory, and the russian federation on the border. we shot it there, it’s impossible to say for sure, but for us, for our population, for our law enforcement agencies, government agencies. we must definitely be ready for any provocations and know how to respond to it, and most importantly, before that, we must collect all the information about any provocation. it just doesn't happen. yes, there are always, uh, information trails, so it’s clear that now the west needs to make some kind of strong blow to russia , information political, foreign policy, economic financial.

well, whether they succeed in it all depends primarily on how we predict them ourselves. here is the most dangerous. this is not the first time we have discussed this. in general, it’s even a shame that listen, 8 years ago , the norman four met in minsk and discussed it. there was a chance we even saw some movements, and there were escalations, but then merkel and poroshenko were told that all this was a front. and look now, kuleba is talking about february 23-24. although a couple of weeks ago he said that there was some kind of ten-point peace plan from zelensky in the plan, that is, there is no smell of peace negotiations, the crisis trust. and here, by the way, i remember. ah, a statement, not a statement of the word silvia berlusconi by the experiments of the minister of italy, who just throws zelensky in the face, and the following was enough for him to stop attacking the two autonomous republics of donbass and this would not have happened, therefore i

evaluate the behavior of this gentleman says berlusconi about zelensky very, very negative and real. recently , we see that zelensky again and again makes a statement that it was he who put an end to minsk agreements. although i remind you that he came to power, promising his voters that he would stop the bloodshed from becoming a war. that's how it is in this world, and hope for some kind of negotiations, when no one else can be trusted. forces to watch how the conflict in ukraine will end after that, rebuild the world, that is , forget about the fact that diplomacy should work. here, how do you see it? well, in my opinion. here, too, one should not underestimate ukraine on the one hand, but one must look at it all the same. not well as on the subject as on the object of politics, so not everything depends on one ukraine from one zelensky for one simple reason, that we are talking now on february 24-23, if you need a picture, but

you need a picture why first, to show that the money that is invested in today day, the west they will be worked out, what to expect on this day, and then ukraine, uh, first of all from the leadership. yes, ukraine, well, here the spectrum is very wide. yes, starting from the fact that we were witnesses of the terrorist act against daria dugina. we have seen that there were mailings poisoned streams. by the way, yes, explosions of the northern streams, the destruction of the crimean bridge. e attack on the air on the naval base in sevastopol that is, the same diaghilev airfields in engels, that is, the spectrum is very, very wide. moreover , supplied weapons, well, they are actually the most modern, which are supplied today by the west, they allow somewhere at a depth of 300 to 300 km to act on this. we must how to behave in this situation in this situation. understand better answer everyone. you were in the same situation.

you will remember on new year's eve, when they also promised to celebrate this situation best of all , general suroviki answered this situation with a massive missile strike, which, in principle, distracted not only ukraine but the entire west, that's how it is necessary to act, that is, in this situation military solution to this problem. it had all the defense attack, of course, definitely, therefore in my opinion. we were witnessing the new year's events. they really demonstrated the readiness and determination of russia to defend itself in these conditions, but find the numbers. vladimir putin has a big conference planned. yes , respectively. that's what kiev is trying to do now, it's setting the stage for diverting media attention. and the whole world from putin’s statement, because here it seems to me, and the whole world is more likely to remember what they say and what putin will announce. and now kiev is trying, but hmm, to distract from this topic, making stuffing about something will happen, there and at the conference some decisions will supposedly be made in it. but this is the general methodology.

arrestovich, talk a lot and make some predictions. you see something, maybe it will come true and say that you are lucky, but from the point of view. what to do? and hmm when, unfortunately, there are fewer and fewer politicians like i take horseback. and what about the russians there? uh, someone from the west spoke, and the russians have one unpleasant thing. such a trait they do what they say, yes, this is approximately how it is perceived by putin lukashenko , there are fewer such leaders, and more and more political ones, well, i’ll say rude balabols and conventurers who they say one thing. and what will do, really? no one has any idea at all, therefore, in the near future, it seems that all lomatya and international will go further into the non-public plane. i think i answer your question. on how to get out of the crisis of confidence, i am sure that this path will be long, uh, and not at all easy. russian foreign minister lavrov said that he had no idea how we

would ever reach normal relations after, uh, what has been done and how much has been destroyed, but nevertheless, if we talk about the conditions for returning to normal relations, then, it seems to me, it is necessary to fulfill several conditions, first to gain one's strength, economic and military and ideological strength. here i would like to recall the minister of foreign affairs of the soviet union, our countryman gromyk andrey andreyevich, who was called mr. no, of course he was not mr. and to me, he just knew how to negotiate, to be able to say compromises. he was rigidly and inexorably set, and the interests were not his own, but interesting countries that he represented and this led to the fact that the ussr was respected, including that its interests were not taken into account by kozyrevism, it was to give up emotional interest. yes, to be patted on the back, namely, to be able to defend yourself, including, uh, there by diplomatic military and other means. and secondly, um. i think

a reset of international institutions will be necessary. he does not work with other institutions that we see today, where he is in all these processes, no one hears at all, but after all, alexander is also a challenge to our internal such integrity, and mobilization in the military sense, but in such a mental cognitive sense absolutely right. now i would just like to move on to the fact that you have implemented this step in your organization. for a long time we have been thinking about how white russia, when there is a base, can be turned into a political party. and now they have found this way out, when the organization remains a union of yours and the party. that's how it is construction, here. is written off in the context that we are with you today discussing. but it's just a few more seconds. i will say that i wanted to support your thesis that we must be strong not only in military and political terms, which i spoke about above, but also in ideological terms , there should not be these flirtations, partners are friends and so on, yes, and deceive yourself. we must clearly understand that we have what we

have. our country. there is our national interest and civilizational shende identity of the eastern european 116 and it must be protected, as far as, uh, parties and public associations. surely they saw one of the parcels. our country needs instruments of unity and a party. can and should be one of those tools. after all, what is a party? this is a unity built on ideology on a specific program and division. here is a certain body of value and meaning, this is a necessary condition for membership in the party , followed by the corresponding activity activity. strengthening the country politically in an ideological such a public worldview, or something like that, and such the kind of task the party can have to solve is very important to choose the right spiritual worldview foundations. they are the system of meanings that even today

we can call it the ideology of the belarusian statehood, which is largely reflected in the constitution in the messages that we introduced to the updated constitution at last year's referendum. and we don't have much time left, but uh, here, trying to collect the main, let's say, thoughts that were voiced today during this conversation, and we understand it’s great that now, in addition to direct military confrontation. there are much more serious or someone calls a hybrid someone is called a proxy. but there is really a struggle of ideas, a struggle for brains. that's quite recently. ah, think tanks in the united states of america in england are, as the clock is known, atlantic council think tanks. e, published an article in which, well, i won’t name them, our viewers are not enough, what if they say, but for specialists. these are well-known people, so look how they will tie you up. what things they write is extremely important for ukraine's friends and allies in the west to punish lukashenka's regime. we fix the first. and then

it will help the belarusian pro-democracy movement in the battle for the hearts and minds of the belarusian people by exposing that lukashenka's support for the war is a direct cause of the growing instability of economic difficulties. that is, they are now correcting the training manual, they are starting what you see with us now, here the war is at hand by the belarusians. this is where they participate. they say that they participated, which means that all our economic difficulties. e about this, that is, they forgot that the sanctions were long before their stuff. and here i want. here you first offer before your answers the president's words that were said last week. he said that we are talking about the price process, in fact , there is not a single meeting now that goes narrowly. only on one igor. that is, it is always considered in the complex. yes? let's hear the president today the question is more than the goal. this is the basis of a just internal order and peace in our country.

pricing is the basis of a just world in belarus, it is the main article of the agreement between the government and the people, so we must endure, we must endure, everyone must strive to save our country. i categorically declare that we have everything for this. we can't just keep it. and when it ends, this is the deal of the planet, we will be an order of magnitude higher than all the facts. today i can't. so i never cheated on you. all my predictions have always been wrong. look in short, the global girl is coming, we hear the president saying that we have everything not only to survive in these circumstances, but also to come out with a plus that the situation is required of us. well, first of all here i would like to say that really hmm because. we can say that the west is trying in every possible way

to turn away from us. well, let's call it that, then definitely. we are already opting for a completely electro- really eastern, this is already evident. well, it's getting stronger in all directions. well, interaction with the russian federation is, as they say. in priora, as a constant, it should be very global today interact. today, within the framework of the csto. first of all, as in the organization of the state , we not only form actions there or conduct exercises there , we interact with collective forces within the framework of this organization, but also develops very widely in the educational military sphere. e tendencies have been outlined very widely and a lot. we work in the scientific field. uh, we maintain very serious serious cooperation with the people's republic of china, primarily with the people's liberation army of china. that's what i want say that here is vector east which is selected. i think for us, first of all, it is promising for the coming years , maybe even for the next decade. on this, one can say that we must

certainly get into the pluses today, even if we look to the west. you see, all globalist ideas have faded into the background, everyone has completely begun to engage in the restoration of the military-industrial complex. what is the military industrial complex, military industrial complex any way, it's a boost or any economy, that is anyway. the component for the impetus for the development of the state in general, as such in the economic in the political, it shows how strong this state is really, if it has strong power, then, accordingly, it is strong power. it can show itself only in these difficult conditions of the situation, where it is really necessary to make strong-willed decisions and bring these strong-willed decisions to the end. uh, our conclusions are what we should be in order to pass this track, you know, here is the president, he is clearly the same says, he says the idea of ​​justice. yes , and uh, according to the lassoal propaganda of the first world war. it clearly says what war is. this is a war of ideas against ideas, that is, our idea, it is the strongest, because

it is very difficult to break it. and that's why the president is not pushing the ideas of some kind of free market. let's develop private corporations, let's develop. he says, no, we need to develop in such a way that everyone who comes to the store feels this justice. they are so coming to the store. could buy it? here you are we are expressed general justice will not be fair , internal conflicts will always begin. this one earns more, this one earns less. this is more can afford. this should not be, and uh, it should be noted that the president did not only talk about prices and about the uneven distribution of income. this is also injustice, and our task now is to make sure that our opponents are ours. well, let's just call it directly, the enemies did not use any technology, ideological in order to rock our society. e, showing that you see that there, and it’s better car than yours. go there to commit. yes , this is unfair in reality,

why are we at all levels? here the president says everyone should protect e our country, because at all levels in all regions of distant points. ah, those in charge of outreach should go and speak to the public. thank you very much, and often the simplest. and at the same time, the most difficult thing, yes, everyone should, uh, do their job well at each specific workplace, and solve those problems that we have in our country, like in any other country in the world. they are some problems, sore points, just the same , the collective west is trying to put pressure on us and is trying to subdue us from the inside, relying on some of our internal problems. and it would be extremely stupid in this situation to turn a blind eye to some problems, and closing your eyes will not solve the problem for sure, therefore, if suddenly we have some points of tension in society. it could be prices. it could be an uneven distribution of income. it might be a question. don't know what to do with the fugitives return no

to return. and these problems need to be quickly resolved, not allowing these sometimes strictly financial , strictly economic, strictly social petty problems, starting with a hole in the road, but so that they do not develop into political problems when, due to a hole in the road in some city . trying to get the people in this city kind of against the authorities, although the problem. it's easy in the pit, but there was no timely solution, so the first to see the problem. now it is extremely important to honestly see them, recognize them and solve them. uh, if we will do it quickly and accurately, then, in general. these are western attempts to influence us we will not be afraid. thank you alexander. i think that in order for us to reach a higher level and get stronger and find ourselves here in the post, uh, war era, among the leaders of the world, we also need to solve this problem and part with the illusions and myths that modern public consciousness is full of . after all

, many people sincerely believe that, well, everything is in order in the world. in general, uh, people there in the west and in general everywhere they are good, they want to be friends to trade there to marry. and here we are talking about some kind of wars about the fact that we need to have a strong army, and to consider such a formulation of the question as inadequacy. rather, on the contrary, it is the inadequacy of living in this illusion of such a complacent and kind world into which we must enter. well, in addition, there are a lot of other myths and historical myths, and in this sense , the work that is being carried out in our country , these dialogue platforms that have become a political e, a brand or a brand of political e, culture, and our society they must continue. and in general, this work with consciousness, which, among other things , is being carried out by our association and by many, uh, others. e subjects of this process, there is social science. well, for many, it must continue and become even more active and truly effective. to be honest, there is an unplowed field in this e in this

plane to work. e need. well, thank you very much. thank you for participating in our program. but we continue the program in a couple of minutes, the well-known russian political scientist and public figure sergey turgenev so stay with us. we continue, the events that are taking place require not only careful recording, but first of all it is important to see the deep meanings. cause causation. to do this, you must agree, we need not just experts, real thinkers, and we are glad that today we have the opportunity to communicate with one of them online sergey kurginyan sergey ivanovich hello, thank you for finding uh time for us. thank you for inviting. ah, with the filing of individual representatives of the ukrainian country, the theme of the korean script for ukraine is how you feel about probability perfectly. they will never go for it.

let's divide under the dnieper that is, this will be the thirty-eighth of ukraine let's divide under it what korea is, this is a divided hare, divided into ukraine for god's sake take this lvov and everything else for yourself and uh, how would you exercise there, as you wish, at least the poles at least who yes for god's sake what's the problem? one that this will never be understand? why is it never out of the question? boris nikolayevich yeltsin please, he had sometimes very bright happy. yes, such people once asked him provocatively like that. but tell me, please, is it possible for a jew to become the head of the russian state?

this will not accept the policy. he's so shot. yes, internal ukrainian politics. we will not accept this again. and the second will not accept it. west it is not necessary. nobody needs it, eternal war. well, the problem lies in this once who gorbachev told me already somewhere in his fund that while you were still some little things in the scientific staff. i went there to meet with twenty-two very influential people, in my opinion, he said to paris, i didn’t say mikhail sergeevich europe is dead and will be dead until the russian cauldron boils. here the russian cauldron boiled, who needs to stop it, macbeth's witches sit and say, and i'll blow. into the sieve. thank you you for the fact that the boiler is boiling. yes, and they only accurately verify the temperature. they need a brew that is simmered on a slow fire. yes, it is not necessary so once and for all. yes, we are here

in conditions where we will not do anything unilaterally. they will impose a war, it must be won. they talk russian cauldron in order to achieve a result, and we must achieve a result from this warm-up b. just don't talk like that all the time. it is not known that first what is satanism, and then that we together with the americans won the cold war. well, don't do this, i beg you. well , they can't look at you. guys, you are in official positions , looking at you and predatory meanly smiling at all my sympathies. not on the side. those who under smiles. why do you give such a reason so impossible. this i say, not to you of course, but to those who bend it all. yes, the names there are so familiar, something from the soviet era. yes

, that's the point here. that we can only do one thing, but we can? create and tap the potentials of new lives from energy of the russian boiler, which no one will stop. slowly, calmly, not without some kind of dramatization, you need to extract this energy of new life. we need to prepare for even much more troubles, we need to do everything possible, and thank god that this is so that this is not discharged by any nuclear war. nobody needs her. this means that the temperature in the boiler jumped sharply, yes, right away, but you need to change your life. this is the worst thing they are afraid of, you need to seriously calmly change your life, leaving all the best, that they have been able to earn. well, you managed to do something, damn it, and this is the best to connect not directly with

some kind of restoration structures, but with rethought modules of the past , the rethought nobility will be crushed so you will put yourself in. then they will start negotiations. well, i don't know, like the cold war model or anything. uh, the general on general issues will always hate, plot intrigues all the time , set fire to something somewhere along the borders, but right now they will not go over to a nuclear war if they go over to any. magical it they have nothing to do, or a space replacement. there are nuclear, so to speak, devices with some kind of rods from outer space. yes , so that the effect was just as destructive, but without infection. so it seems to me that there are madmen who want a nuclear war, but there are not many of them. so we need to move there. we

will not change this constant and do not listen to what someone in ukraine is talking about, no one will share anything. nobody will share anything. it will be completely different to strike more, as if tangibly, using more separate patient weapons and attempts to create. revenge. here are the new details around. uh, northern streams, the investigation of an american journalist, seyan, hersh, convincingly proves that the americans staged a terrorist attack, the norwegians helped, but can this information affect anything at all, given that, for example, the western press, it defiantly ignores this sensational material or in general, they are trying to turn hershe into a traitor, or even a madman. oh, can i say, there is one thing, really very talented journalist. i know an investigative journalist. yes, he stands there 10 well -trained spies. yes, he is a nimble guy

and can sniff out everything, but in one percent of 100 cases. this is such a talent. yes, the eccentric is always such a slightly kooked such a sniffer. yes, this is a very important figure. on hersh. it is not quite this, but in all other cases. i want plums to remember this. these plums are journalists with experience , authority and a corresponding reputation, who are given information, and they draw up, and so it was always there the twentieth century. and not only that, so the question is who leaked all this to hersh. who leaked it to him, but who leaked it, he wants something, yes, but what he wants is what he eats. the most important intrigue in this field, so the question here

is that of course everyone will be hushed up and everyone will be indignant, but this hersh, this is not an osanzh. he is not a suicide, he is from the elite, he is a respectable person. if he realized that it would be a strong b-bom for him , he wouldn’t do it, you know, in some way. uh, it means that it was as if one of the leaders of the pravda newspaper told me in the soviet era, we are not a rural life magazine, we have no directives. we have pnd management, we have to guess what to print? and that there is no pnd board , so hersh is controlled by the trend. he understands where it is possible.