the new host on friday after he tweeted that the uk government's new migration policy is similar to the one used in nazi germany however. this is not the only uk-related scandal. the international olympic committee issued a statement in which it commented on the appeal of the government of this country to the sponsors of the games to prevent the participation of russian and belarusian athletes in the olympics in paris, it is not for the government to decide. what athletes can participate? which international competitions? would that be the end of world sport as we know it? today we very much hope that the british government will respect the autonomy of sport, which it has emphasized in many decisions, statements or resolutions of the un . so see you.

on march 19, 1944, at the location of the village of azarichi, kalinkovichi district of the polissya region , thousands of recent prisoners of the death camp passed through a sanitary checkpoint organized by the military, each of them was met by doctors , representatives of the government commission to establish the crimes of the nazis, which they did in a concentration camp in the open air, what these people looked like and what they told were shocked. which was

on the verge of insanity and categorically refused to go through all the persuasion itself. they turned out to be futile. she was very afraid that they would take away the bundle, which the woman did not let go of her hands. to all the questions that in the bundle only pressed him harder to his chest without ceasing to repeat, please, i beg you, please, send me as soon as possible home. how events unfolded many years later, in 1984, in an interview with belarusian television, nadezhda grekova told that she was the first to enter the liberated camp, azarichi, as one of the leaders of the bssr government commission created to investigate the facts of the extermination of soviet people by the nazis by infection with typhus on the screen unique footage of the chronicle. also

a woman mother. the terrible story of irina ivanovna lavrova from velikiye luki was that name, the woman distraught with grief was one of the thousands of other stories of prisoners of this terrible death camp, they memories of those who had to go through

its horrors. in the materials of the first protocol of the government commission dated april 26 , 1944, with conclusions about what happened in azarishcha in the testimony of witnesses at the nuremberg trials in new investigative cases of the prosecutor general's office of belarus the prosecutor general's office of the republic of belarus post-war period from the testimony of prisoners of the death camp,

the germans did not give water to food in the concentration camp there was no concentration camp. we took this dirty snow warmed up in our palms. and so we drank water and the corpses of dead people lay nearby, and those who were still alive did not have the strength to remove them. the camp was a swampy place, fenced with barbed wire two rows at a distance of 2 m, the wire was not allowed to approach, if someone violated this zone immediately, then they started shooting. people were dying before our eyes, there was a groan, there was a cry, there was a cloak. well, bring us to the camp, and many of them are a dungeon, and they already came so exhausted that they

fell down and never got up again. from the village from that time to zaritsky, 20 more. the chickens will peck. all the corpses are lying and the sister of the vulga has died. it was snowing, my mother put it down. and i, but i don’t feel it anymore, but i warm my hands under this sweater until i warm my hands, i’m dead. lie down and i'm russian, there was constant

shooting. it usually starts at five o'clock. how would it be in the evening and until 9:00 until, as you can see , our troops did not discover that this was a camp? at the beginning of 1944, the military intelligence of the 65th army reported to his commander pavel ivanovich on the territory of the kalinkovichi region. by all indications. this is exactly the camp about which there was already operational information.

the germans organized a typhoid camp in the woodland as a protective shield against the advancing red army. his last hopes were pinned on him. stop the rapid advance of the soviet troops. it was assumed that when the camp was liberated , mass infection would begin among them. now the information was confirmed, intelligence reported that behind the barbed wire a large number of people are on the ground no buildings on there is no territory, except for the towers for the german guards, there are many corpses and a lot of patients with chain typhus approaches to the camp for mineralans. leaning over the map of the area. the scouts began to tell in detail where in what place it is possible to organize approaches to moisture.

how to neutralize the guards and start demining the adjacent territories? and the know-how of the nazis on the mass extermination of people will be known to the world at the nuremberg trials in the forty-sixth . destroyed in a record short time, even by wartime standards, in almost 10 days according to the classification of crimes against humanity, it will be classified as category a and, in its cruelty, will be on a par with sventsim and maidan. the nazis did not hesitate

to use all possible means to hold their positions, lieutenant general friedrich hospach. the containment plan personally reported to the nazis in places of a possible breakthrough of the defense, it is necessary to organize them with a population infected with a satisfying type of other diseases. and the plan became hastily implement. letter to our dear leader comrade stalin from 33,000 citizens of soviet belarus liberated by our valiant red army from the german death camp in the ozarichi district of the polesye region. the first emotion is the first

awareness of the experience, these testimonies are especially valuable . at night, the guards drove us along the road, they found those lagging behind. 12:15 km mothers carried babies and could no longer move from their fatigue. immediately finished off the german monsters. so keep a woman with three children alone. the small lagged german shoots at him. when the mother of two children stopped, the beast soldier shot them in turn. hallelujah the memories of those who were able to survive this hell defy any human logic. i still remember one terrible story next to us. there was a family, a big family. there

were many children in one night. i remember very well that night was strong. the frost melted during the day , then again, but the frost and this family did not wake up in the morning. here they sat. they all remained on their haunches. yes, a woman stood a little girl in her arms, how apparently, she was already a dead girl to dress, then some man came up to her and helped, which means, to take her. come on, she took the handkerchief off her head, wrapped it up and gave it back, and he took it to where the dead lay.

in march 1944, on the territory of the bssr, the nazis carried out a monstrous experiment on the civilian population with its cruelty that shook the world in the camp, they all infected us with typhus once , as i remember, there was bread, there is so much gorky right today is possible. from materials about the extermination of soviet people by the nazis by infection with typhus

april 30, 1944 in the period from march 9 to march 13, 1944, the nazis, under reinforced ss escort and police guards , drove to a camp in the area of ​​​​the town, and about 50,000 soviet citizens 20,000 died of starvation typhoid cold. in total , there were over 33,000 soviet citizens in the camp, among 15.5 thousand children under the age of 13, including more than 500 orphans whose parents were killed or died in these camps. almost four and a half

thousand women old men hello, i just want to wish our viewers to get settled, get comfortable with the excellent line-up of experts in this edition. i welcome our guests.

thank you for taking the time, and in the second part of the program, the russian public figure sergey kruginya is also known to be in touch, so what awaits you and me is a meaningful conversation, security is the number one issue with this today and let's start on monday, alexander lukashenko led a meeting with a new general secret let me remind you that belarus is chairing the organization this year, but i would like to start with this fragment. we look if someone thinks that there is a conflict between ukraine and russia, this is not our conflict, that we will sit quietly somewhere, nothing like this will happen. the time will come, it is literally not far away. here it is tomorrow, when this time will require to be determined to take a certain position. i am not saying that it is to the detriment of national interests and so on, but with all our allied shortcomings. we will have to clearly define our policy and our line

in order to act . it's easier to send such a frank and honest message to our partners in the accident. what do you think, did everyone hear it? first, i'll tell you about what, from my point of view, the head of our state was leaving when he sent this message. i think that it came not so much from an appeal to solidarity to some moral feelings. how much he uttered the simple truth that it is impossible to ensure security alone in the modern world, if we draw a historical analogy, then the thirties of the 20th century, uh, in some ways resembled the current situation, and the ussr called with all its might to create a unified security system in europe, if it had been created, then the wehrmacht general staff would hardly have decided on such an adventure, because he understood that the united forces of europe

of the soviet union were much larger, but preferred to sit out in their national apartments. somewhere they played their games, they got what they got, and today we have a situation similar to the need to unite in order to meet those challenges, and challenges. really close to the third world war to the beginning of the third world war in order to find challenges give an adequate answer, what else do i want to say about this, our partners in the csd need to understand, uh, a simple thing, that the goals of the collective west are not small countries in the post-soviet space, their real goals are russia and china as major geopolitical competitors and hit they are these goals, using such a favorite method of anglo-saxon geopolitics, creating a loop of anaconda well, that is, along the perimeter, creating a hostile environment and suffocating in this hostile environment, unleashing conflicts on borders.

uh, they set up military bases there, provoking chaos, which will inevitably spill over into uh, the territory of russia, and there will be chaos, including among the partners in the csd, who will limit with russia in this sense , i want to emphasize my point again, and security. not for someone not for someone else's uncle. this is for yourself, for your people, and only together. we'll be able to provide it. alexei well, it's really involved. now we will see that last year was such a test of independence , first in kazakhstan, then they killed saw armenians azerbaijani conflict, where it is very difficult, of course, for us, the situation is on the one hand. armenia is a member of the dcb on the other hand, azerbaijan is such a traditional one for us, a big partner. here it was very important not to aggravate the presence of an accident, that is, understandably, not to resolve the situation. there the task is different, but from the point of view of hearing this message that was voiced in minsk on monday. as you see it, you know, we still have to understand that in reality the tkb is a union of sovereign

states. and those who fight against us large corporations, industrial banking corporations and they have an a plan for the next 15 years. this is the destruction of sovereign states. uh immerse them, and in a state of chaos. e. the complete destruction of any constitutional system of any government agencies of law enforcement agencies, uh, and. and the immersion of the population, just such a very, uh, severe socio-economic crisis. and when the president says that, uh, tomorrow this challenge will come, the challenge is just related to the confrontation of sovereign states with their those corporations, if we we will not resist, and we alone will definitely not be able to resist their huge, and their asset e money supply, but together we can resist and save our world, and most importantly , keep the world in order. eh, completely different.

not the one that a large corporation is now trying to impose on the national elites of these countries, but those who own large capitals, because the russian one has roughly shown that these young capitals, no matter how big they were, they were equal. players in the big arena im quick at each their seat, accordingly, to save your capital when you go beyond your national jurisdiction, if you are not sovereign, it is extremely difficult, perhaps this is also a call to the fact that times have really changed now igor what do you think, but let's do it with our opponents and even i would name enemies . here is. in general, what our country has a little less hmm is unity. despite the fact that , of course, there in the west they also swear about how many weapons to supply e to ukraine e, how does anyone see the fighting in from the point of view of national interests, but there is only one thing there, if such unity is on our part,

even if we consider the csto. well, let's just say that there are certain questions about this unity, and this is not the first time we have. uh, hmm, not the first time. the president says that we must all be united in the csto, and this is not the first time. even, probably, in this studio we are discussing to whom it was a message, and whether they will hear it, and so on, maybe. the time is coming, perhaps, alexander grigorievich is talking about this when there is a reason to revise the list of participants treaty on collective security, maybe someone new to include , but there are many who want to, because there are countries that understand that it is impossible to cope with the western threat alone, but maybe some countries wish. uh, to leave this union, because from the point of view of the military, yes, and political economic it is very important to feel that your partner will be with you in any situation about leaving. yes, we are now in the chairmanship, knowing the style and spirit of belarus and, in particular, alexander lukashenko what is called not on my shift agree here, but a matter

of public discussion. perhaps already so long enough overdue. here is the csto, as an organization, what can be done, well, not declarative, but really working . what decisions should be made so that this organization still gains political and military weight? even more to the level to which it was planned, and andrey petrovich , his military point of view, a military expert yes , we heard another very important settlement, despite the fact that the contexts are now the most unfavorable and it was possible to to refer and say that well, let's put off until better times the solution of some tasks that can be tolerated, but belarus, having become the chairman, and the president said about it and i will quote, but the most difficult tasks are ahead of me, for example, here i am. hmm, i will repeat the words of the president. we took the risk during our presidency to try to solve these problems that we have, and the caucasus and central asia we have problems there. let's try to resolve them and

unite the organization as much as possible. hmm, a difficult task, but it is doable at all now this year or are we just the main thing to start this path, and then it will follow further. you understand, this is most likely there, the very main message that the president wanted to say, in theory, as if everyone understands that yes, if we are all together, we are much stronger, well, in practice, everyone tries to pull the blanket anyway on ourselves, firstly, if we are talking about the dkb, it is quite such an organization, which is geographically very strong, well, it is located in almost the entire eurasian region. so , accordingly, what worries the countries for example, central asia is less concerned about, for example, belarus well, and vice versa , what is happening today is great. this is understanding and talking about the fact that you won’t have to serve time. here you need, the main thing is to understand at what stage you won’t have to serve time, because each of the republics of the members of the road accident perfectly understands what it means to support a special military operation today.

it is to immediately fall under the ax for the collective west, these are immediately harsh sanctions, which, moreover, cover all spectrums of absolutely vital activity states, both external and internal, and , accordingly, whether any state is ready for this. and most importantly, we need to understand, really. do we really need those states that are really directly involved in this or that degree in this armed conflict. i mean the republic of belarus the russian federation do we need it we talk a lot about hybrid warfare. that is, today's actions are largely based on indirect actions; accordingly, we are limited in getting some modern technology. we are limited in obtaining some resources that we do not have, perhaps we have the opportunity to receive these resources through these countries. maybe this is not a direct military assignment. maybe it will be just dual-use or civilian use. there we will figure out how good luck to attach it. maybe it really is. this is the exit exactly there, which

allows us to get around, including males. well, as for the actual use in terms of military force, then well, there are a lot of military to a large extent, political will was not required in order for us to unite. well, as the events in january showed, in january of last year, we will need a little time for this, about one to three days, enough for us to organize this organization and our main forces. first of all, the collective forces brought into action and efficiency. i think you have seen it all . that is why it is unequivocal to say that we really need to unite today and oppose the collective west or after all, we need to find other inputs and approaches in order to influence this process on the west, indeed , the president’s message was really made not only correct, but he was further argued by these all of his words.

it is connected, we really need to decide who will really enter at what stage, let's move on, then there was another guest in minsk and whose visit to the belarusian capital caused serious irritation in the west. of course, i mean the head of the hungarian foreign ministry , peter, not only did he dare the day before arrival in minsk dared to call the european parliament one of the most corrupt organizations in the world. so here in minsk, with a belarusian colleague, he says that sanctions are being discussed incorrectly on peaceful tracks in ukraine . they agreed on a cooperation program for the whole 23 year, which is the main thing you see in the arrival of the hungarian minister. they tried to find some kind of symbols yes, symbols, symbols, moreover , the head of the foreign ministry, tak, indicated that his visit would definitely cause sharp criticism from the outside. ah, eurocountry, uh, anglo-saxon, like

glomerate, but the question is what he continued on, we pursue exclusively our national interests, if it’s beneficial for us, and it’s beneficial, well, hungarian, to be friends with belarus , first of all, you are the economy in production. well, we will do this and, in principle, your irritation is not important to us. and that's just such an independent. eh, the position of independent politics and annoying they do not obey brussels do not obey it was possible and said a number of ministers. er, what is the question? but the head and mida he is also the head external economic department, that is , its main task, including the solution of economic issues, and the question arises. and hungary did not support the sanctions policy. and the european union actually receives e resources at better prices, can cooperate from belarus with russia with other countries

of the eurasian space and thereby solve their national economic problems. they have lower inflation, and neighboring countries also work for production. naturally, they look. the most important common people simple working they look and say that, then , our politicians have betrayed us, and these national politicians have been elected. and he observes his people. it is his interests. they are interests there, uh america and uh, some corporations, but this is more, of course, what concerns such hungarian interests. yes, of course. in hungary , with this visit of the shining one to minsk , it turned out to be pluses in this european field from the other side. no matter what, but what is it for us? it is clear that the head of the foreign ministry, like any diplomat , will not say everything publicly. in general, he in my opinion, in his comments after the visit, he said that somewhere some meetings were public, some not public , it is important for us that this is a visit, and a person of high

office from europe is such a first sign. after all, many want to normalize relations with belarus and russia, but so far it has not been collectively accepted and it is always more difficult to be the first. and the one who will be the locomotive and will first collect all some kind of negativity on himself regarding the fact that it’s impossible and impossible to work with belarus but that’s good, but art came to minsk after that surely some other political players. europeans will come to minsk with great pleasure because they want to work with belarus , communicate with belarus . i think that ours is for our european diplomacy , which one way or another continues to exist and exist well, because there are behind-the-scenes negotiations, and not public ones, but for our public pro-western one, and diplomacy - this is a very good starting such a signal, hungary in general, she is such a white crow in a european family. we saw how now during the summit in uh, in the eu

, everyone ran applauding, hugging, kissing zelensky, while urban defiantly kept aloof. it was visible. he emphasized it. i would also like to say a few words on this topic. i am in solidarity with aleksey alekseevich that here the fault line passes along the ashes, the criterion of the national anti-national elite, they serve their people , they serve as foreign masters. but what else can i mark? i can note a few things, firstly, hungary is quite strict distance. from the cultural policy that is taking place in the european union from that bacchanalia , bacchanalia that is happening, i'm talking about gender policy, about this cultural policy in general, or better to say the antips of pseudo cultural policy, there are strong catholic roots. eh, the hungarian people, they do not allow us to take the path of dehumanization. uh, on the way to the destruction of their

european national culture, the second thing i want to note, but this one, probably such a strong statement, but due to the fact that now everyone is watching very closely, and who will ultimately win the conflict in ukraine, my deep conviction is that the conflict in ukraine is yes, and everyone understands this, this is not a local conflict, this is a reformatting of the world geostructures of the world. and if you join the winner, you can then reap the laurels, er, the winner, and i think that they take this moment into account and put it. a bet on russia on belarus as an ally and russia in this e-conflict. uh, i want to emphasize again, and emphasize on the results of this war will be redistributed. uh, peace, at least in european. eh, the continent and hungary are fully aware of the fact that now it is necessary to look, er, and er, into the future from this angle of vision. well, at the same time, mine . although i at least noted that urban was in no hurry. hmm, to show a special feeling for zelensky but in the meantime, with

a trick. it was very warm, uh, both in the uk and in. brussels in general, this visit of zelensky is real. do you expect it to bring some real change on the battlefield or some sort of ritual story, no i will explain why. the fact is that the important premise of my thesis is that the elite of the collective west still retained a colonial mindset. they do not see zelensky as a partner, as an equal figure. this is a servant, this is a colony. it is impossible to have a conversation with the servants and it is not necessary to have a conversation on an equal footing; they must know their place. and the fact that they play these games. he arrived there, hugged him there, and so on. it's uh, the audience. i am sure that they will have completely different conversations, but from their national interests, if they are at all pursue b and, most likely from the instructions that they receive. well uh now. i think the following is weighed. that is

, are they ready to become a participant having already thrown off their masks, they are practically already thrown off. well, it honestly depends. well, the participants in the conflict , we are at war, and the solution to this issue will depend on a specific solution. will they give planes? uh, will there be other types of weapons that can radically turn the tide on the battlefield provided, but look andrey petrovich, here we are talking when they their position is indicated, no matter how, no matter how they try to say that they are just representing. it's a weapon, but not involved in the conflict, but it's funny. that is, it is not clear how far away a person needs to be in order to from information, in order to believe in it, here is stoltenberg. e, said, in general, the important thing is to create an even stronger army in ukraine after any conclusion of the current conflict. that is, this suggests that it may not even be only a colony, that is, this is a permanent military hot the point is the statement of stoltenberg, who, well, as

they say, does not spare words today in relations. he really has such a character. uh, like maintaining this fire in the hearth of this confrontation. and today nato has taken such a position, they will give both planes and tanks, but only in those quantities that are necessary to maintain this conflict in order to try to destroy russia from the inside, because from the outside to destroy the state that has the strongest world nuclear potential is impossible, therefore, it is precisely the stake that is being placed on the destruction of russia from the inside and, most importantly, how they went about this destruction from the inside. they took the path of not using the liberals today, who by and large do not have any weight against the background of a special military operation to raise patriotic feelings, and they rely today on patriotic-minded people and prolonging the conflict, the uncertainty of the action will lead to exactly what

patriots, as in february of the seventeenth year , as they say, can rise against the existing government and this cannot be allowed. although it is precisely with regard to nato itself that it is necessary to take a look at their military strategies, what they expect from us is some mitigation. until 2030, it is clearly spelled out for them and for the first time that in what is what in the us national security strategy that in strategy 2.000 until 2030 nato for the first time spelled out the republic of belarus where it is clearly defined that they are concerned about human rights in our country, which are allegedly violated and secondly, that belarus is one of the countries that interferes with the entire world order in europe that is, what they have prepared for us. it's clearly visible, no one will talk to us. here to mind. even such words come. you know, in the background, a bent gingerbread, when they were said by one well-known, uh, ukrainian politician, who said he promises them anything, and

we will hang them later. therefore, nato politicians must be treated very, very carefully at their time of remarks. uh, we saw really different moods about zelensky’s visit on the one hand spectacular, and such a tour, uh, and macrons scholz met with charles iii, but here's what news week writes, for example, this is one of the authoritative publications of a tour of europe that showed zelensky's despair and the author of this article brandon call claims that zelensky falls into despair is the realization that the meeting with european politicians does not give any result. that is , what the ukrainians might have counted on, whom zelensky should have represented, that is, there is such a place there. we have such a very illustrative example with all these european and e-tours. this is actually, madam, tikhonovskaya who when this movement with european trips began. here her electorate was joyfully clapping their hands, and now we will live. now they will help us all with something. and so

on. here is zelinsky, because plus or minus repeats exactly the same path of tikhonovskaya, this immediately causes a wow effect in the audience. here is the tikhanovskaya zelensky and the european audience, which is watching, observing the principles of democracy, the joy of victory over uh, russia and russians and so on, and then after some time, the electorate of tikhanovskaya zelensky immediately has an idea. well, it’s good that we’ve traveled and what, no matter how farther what it affects on anything, then the europeans already have exactly the same thoughts , well, they came again, but first she. and now, when we are talking about zelensky, zelensky has arrived again and that he is again asking for money, and what's next? that is, this is an internal irritation. it seems to me, but hmm, on the one hand, our opponents. they are trying to cause absolutely agree irritation inside us inside the union state, but at the same time some steps of the collective west it seems to me that it still causes much more irritation to its audience in europe because, well, zelensky and here the topic of ukraine

is fed up, and it is artificially again trying to be in the top, there are absolutely readers of the daily mail very harshly criticized. let's listen. now why is he even here this is not a british conflict. we must not interfere in this. we're giving british taxes to a telecomic hate-monger. why? of course, the establishment will help him. already made the decision to escalate permanently. instead of, to find a way out. please note that i will not die on the front lines of such a european one, and, unfortunately, politics is such a frank conventionism, and then it all goes over and it ’s immediately fashionable for your electorate to maintain the political field, well, the status and power, uh, praise zelensky and talk about that we should stand up for ukraine in the conflict with russia. after some time, more and more fashionable, and in e. for the population becomes other theses. zelensky is not needed. i need to help ukraine why are we doing this. for what we spend a lot of money and the same

people. after some time, they shouted that let's help zelensky. they will shout with exactly the same zeal that everything is enough, we spent too much money. why is he coming, because it's just such a european political situation. well, here is the most important thing to add. we even see on the faces of european politicians. not zelensky that indeed they are all at an impasse. they don't know how to get out of it. they can only do. this show he can come there several times a day several times there to call to do. uh, show program, but that doesn't really solve it. the main problem is theirs. they wanted to destroy through ukraine, as it was correctly said , somewhere within a year or two, and lead russia to protests, and the collapse of the russian economy, even after russia would be conditional on them. and naturally , they could not achieve this further to deal with china. yes, russia was able to mobilize,

huh? could unite and the integration association, including the union state, yes, uh, a military group is stationed with us, and they are already forced to play this theater of the absurd to the end, but they don’t really know how to get out of it. they will continue to focus only on escalation, because as soon as they stop the whole world. and most importantly, global investors. here they will sit for coffee and laugh at them very much, because they lost, but everyone else started. and what should zelensky do , and in any case, he will rise someday, regardless of how the conflict in ukraine ends, uh, how to relate to the words of truly ukrainian, uh, hmm representatives, here, in particular, the minister of foreign affairs, kuleba, who, on february 23-24, the anniversary of the beginning of their lives are expected to quote great events that russia will remember. well, uh, on the one

hand, you can't say that they're not preparing something, you can't treat it with some kind of humor and say, nothing will happen. it is clear that e zelensky, his entire team is pr people. this means that they will prepare some kind of action of the first action, a provocation, where it will shoot on the territory, and the russian border federations. it’s impossible to say for sure that it was fired there, but for us, for our population, for our power structures of government agencies. we must definitely be ready for any provocations and know how to respond to it, and most importantly, before that, we must collect all the information about any provocation. it just doesn't happen. yes, there are always, uh, information trails, so it’s clear that now the west needs to make some kind of strong blow to russia , information political, foreign policy, economic financial. well, whether they succeed in this all depends primarily on how we predict them ourselves,

the most dangerous thing here. this is not the first time we have discussed this. in general, it’s even a shame that listen, 8 years ago , the norman four met in minsk and discussed it. there was a chance we even saw some movements, and there were escalations, but then merkel and poroshenko were told that all this was a front. and look now, kuleba is talking about february 23-24. although a couple of weeks ago he said that there was some kind of zelensky the peace plan consists of ten points in the plan, that is, there is no smell of peace negotiations, a crisis of confidence. and here, by the way, i remember. ah, a statement, not a statement of the word silvia berlusconi by the experiments of the minister of italy, who just throws zelensky in the face, and the next one was enough for him to stop attacking the two autonomous republics of donbass and this would not have happened, therefore i evaluate the behavior of this gentleman says berlusconi about zelensky very, very negative indeed. lately , we've been seeing zelensky doing it again and again.

a statement that it was he who put an end to the minsk agreements. although i remind you that he came to power, promising his voters that he would stop the bloodshed from becoming a war. that's how it is in this world, and hope for some kind of negotiations, when no one else can be trusted. forces to watch how the conflict in ukraine will end after that, rebuild the world, that is, forget about the fact that diplomacy should work. here, how do you see it? well, in my opinion. here, too, one cannot underestimate ukraine, on the one hand, but one should still look at it not as a subject, as an object of politics, therefore, not everything depends far from one ukraine from one zelensky for one simple reason, that we are talking now on february 24-23, if you need a picture, but a picture need why first, to show that the money that is investing today, the west will work out, what to expect on this day, and then

ukraine, uh, first of all from the leadership. yes , ukraine, well, here the spectrum is very wide. yes , starting from what we witnessed and terrorist attack against daria, we saw that the mail was poisoned by northern streams. by the way, yes, explosions of the northern streams, the destruction of the crimean bridge. e attack on the air base in sevastopol that is, the same airfields in diaghilev venge, that is, the spectrum is very, very wide. moreover, the supplied weapons, well, they are actually the most modern that are supplied today by the west. they allow somewhere at a depth of 300 to 300 km to act on this were to this. we must how to behave in this situation in this situations. you know best to answer. you were in the same situation. you will remember on new year's eve, when they also promised to celebrate this situation best of all , general surovikin answered this situation with a massive missile strike

, which, in principle, distracted not only ukraine but the entire west, that's how it is necessary for you here, that is, in this situation a military solution to this problem. it had conditionally all defense attack, of course, of course, therefore, in my opinion, we were witnesses of new year's events. they have demonstrated their willingness and russia's determination to defend itself in these conditions, but to find numbers. vladimir putin has a big conference planned. yes , respectively. that's what kiev is trying to do now - it's setting the stage for diverting media attention. and the whole world from putin’s statement, because here it seems to me, but the whole world will rather remember what they say and what putin will announce. but kiev is already trying, and distracting from this topic by making stuffing about something will happen, there and at the conference, he will supposedly make some decisions. but this is the general methodology. arrestovich, we talk a lot and make some predictions. you see something, maybe it will come true and say that you are lucky, but from the point

of view. what to do? and hmm, when, unfortunately, there are fewer and fewer politicians like i take with me. and how the russians have it. uh, someone from the west spoke, and the russians have one unpleasant thing. such a trait they do what they say, yes, this is approximately how it is perceived by putin lukashenko , there are fewer such leaders, and more and more political ones, well, i’ll say rude balabols and conventurers who they say one thing, to do it. in fact, no one understands . in general, it doesn’t have at all, accordingly, in the near future, it seems that the whole international break will go further into the non-public plane. i think i answer your question. on how to get out of the crisis of confidence, i am sure that this path will be long, uh, and not at all easy. russian foreign minister lavrov said that he had no idea how we would ever reach normal relations after, uh, what has been done and how much has been destroyed, but nevertheless, if we talk about the conditions

for returning to normal relations, then, it seems to me, it is necessary to fulfill several conditions, first to gain one's strength, economic and military and ideological strength. here i would like to recall the minister of foreign affairs of the soviet union, our countryman gromyk andrey andreyevich, who was called mr. no, of course he was not mr. and to me, he just knew how to negotiate, to be able to say compromises. he is tough and relentless. left his interests not his own, but interesting countries that he represented and this led to the fact that the ussr was respected, including that its interests were not taken into account by kozyrevism, it was to surrender emotional interests. yes, to get a pat on the back, namely, to be able to defend yourself, including, uh, diplomatic military and other means, and secondly, uh. hmm. i think that it will be necessary to reset international institutions. he does not work with other institutions that we see today, where he is in all

these processes, no one hears at all, but after all, alexander is also a challenge to our internal such integrity, and mobilization in the military sense, but in such a mental cognitive sense absolutely right. now i would just like to move on to the fact that you have implemented this step in your organization. for a long time we have been thinking about how white russia, when there is a base, can be turned into a political party. and now they have found this way out, when the organization remains a union of yours and the party. that's how it is construction, here. is written off in the context that we are with you today discussing. but it's just a few more seconds. i will say that i wanted to support your thesis that we must be strong not only in military and political terms, which i spoke about above, but also in ideological terms , there should not be these flirtations, partners are friends and so on, yes, and deceive yourself. we must clearly understand that we have what we have. our country is our national interest and civilizational identity of the east european 116 and it must be defended,

as far as, uh, parties and public associations are concerned. surely they saw one of the parcels. our country needs instruments of unity and a party. can and should be one of those tools. after all, what is a party? this is a unity built on ideology on a specific program and division. here, uh, a certain body of value and meaning is a necessary condition for membership in the party, after this, the corresponding activity is the activity of the country in political terms , in an ideological such a social worldview, or something, and this kind of task, the party can solve it is very important to choose the right spiritual philosophical foundations. they are the system of meanings that today we can call it the ideology of the belarusian statehood, which is largely reflected in the constitution in the messages that we introduced to the updated constitution at

last year's referendum. uh, we don’t have much time left, but uh, here, trying to collect the main, let’s say, thoughts that were voiced today during this conversation, and we understand perfectly well that now, apart from a direct military confrontation. there are much more serious someone calls a hybrid someone is called a proxy. but there is really a struggle of ideas , a struggle for brains. that's quite recently. and the thought factory in the united states of america in england works like clockwork , uh, think tanks are known the atlantic council, uh, published an article in which well, i won’t name them to our viewers, what if they say, but for specialists. these are well-known people, look how they connect. what things they write is extremely important for ukraine's friends and allies in the west to punish lukashenka's regimes. we fix the first. a it will further help the belarusian, sort of democratic movement in the battle for the hearts and minds of the belarusian people by exposing that

lukashenka's support for the war is the direct cause of the growing instability of economic hardships. that is, they are correcting the training manual now, it starts what you see here now, here is the war at the side of the belarusians. this is where they participate. they say that they participated, which means all our economic difficulties. e about this, that is , they forgot that the sanctions were long before swa and so on. and here i want. here you go first suggest before your answers the president's words, which will be said last week. it seemed to be about prices. in fact, there is not a single meeting now that goes narrowly. only for some one . igor here you are, like stripes of a journalist. don't let me lie. that is, it is always considered in the complex. let's hear the president today the question is more than the goal. fair internal order and peace in our country, pricing is the basis of a fair world in belarus, this is

the main article of the agreement between the authorities and the people, therefore, we must endure, we must put up , everyone must strive to preserve our country. i categorically declare that we have everything for this. we can't just keep it. and when this division of the planet is over, we will be an order of magnitude higher than all the facts. today i can't do that. i never cheated. all my predictions have always been wrong. here is an important question. look, petrovich, a global girl, is walking, we hear the president saying that we have everything not only to survive in these circumstances, but also to get out plus what the situation requires of us. well, first of all, i would like to say here that really hmm because. we can say that the west is trying in every possible way to turn away from us, but let's call it that, then definitely. we already choose completely vector indeed. eastern is already visible. well, it's getting stronger in all directions.

well, interaction with the russian federation is, as they say. a priori, this is as a constant today. we interact very globally. today, within the framework of the csto. first of all, as a military organization states. we form not only actions there or conduct exercises there with collective forces and interactions within the framework of this organization, but we are also developing very widely in the educational military sphere. these tendencies have been outlined very widely and we are working on a lot in the scientific field. uh, we maintain very serious serious cooperation with the people 's republic of china, primarily with the people's liberation army of china. so i want to say that this is the east vector that has been chosen. i think for us uh before it is most promising for the coming years, perhaps even for the coming decades . it can be said that, as far as we are concerned, we must definitely go into the pluses today, even if we look to the west. you see, all globalist ideas have faded into the background, everyone has completely begun to engage in

the restoration of the military-industrial complex. what is the military industrial complex military-industrial complex in any case, it is an impetus or any economy, that is, in any case, the military component, well, the impetus for the development of the state in general, as such in the economic political, it shows how strong this state is really, if it has strong power, then, accordingly, it is strong power. it can only show itself in these difficult conditions of the situation and you really need to make strong-willed decisions and bring these strong-willed decisions to the end, uh , our conclusions are what we should be in order to go through this track, you know, here is the president. he speaks clearly, he speaks the idea of ​​justice. yes, and also in lassual propaganda of the first world war. it clearly says what war is. this is a war of ideas against ideas, that is, our idea, it is the strongest . because it is very difficult to break it. and that's why the president is not pushing the ideas

of some kind of free market. let's develop private corporations, let's develop. he says, no, we need to develop in such a way that everyone who comes to the store feels this justice. they are so that coming to the store and could not buy it. that is why general justice is expressed; there will be no justice, internal conflicts. this one earns more, this one earns less, this one earns more. can afford. this should not be, and uh, it should be noted that the president did not only talk about prices and about uneven. the division of income is also injustice, and our task now is to make sure that our opponents are ours. well, let's just call it directly, the enemies did not use any technology, ideological in order to rock our society. uh, showing that you see that there, and a better car than you goes there to do yes, this is unfair in reality, we are at all levels. why? here the president says everyone should protect e our country, because at all levels in

all regions of distant points. uh, those in charge of outreach should go and speak to the public. thanks, you don’t often experience the simplest and at the same time the most difficult. yes, everyone should , uh, do their own thing well, uh, at each specific workplace, and solve those problems that we have in our country, as in any country in the world. they got some problems sore points, just the same, the collective western is trying on us. and he is trying to break us from the inside, relying on some of our internal problems. and it would be extremely stupid in this situation to turn a blind eye to some problems that exist, and closing your eyes will not solve the problem for sure, therefore, if suddenly we have some points of tension in society. and it could be prices. it could be an uneven distribution of income. it might be a question. uh, do not know what to do with the fugitive return do not return. and these

problems need to be quickly resolved, not giving the opportunity to these sometimes strictly financial, strictly economic, strictly social petty problems, starting with a hole in the road, but so that they do not develop into political problems when, because of a hole in the road in some city, they try to bring out the people in this city type against the authorities, although the problem. it's simple in the pit, but there was no timely solution, so the first thing is to see the problem. now it is extremely important to honestly see them, recognize them and solve them. uh, if we do this quickly and clearly, then, in general, this is western attempts to influence us we will not be afraid. thank you alexandrovich for your findings. i think in order for us to reach a higher level stronger and find ourselves in the post, uh, war era, among the uh, leaders. eh, world, we also need to solve this problem, to part with the illusions and myths that modern public consciousness is full of, after all. uh, a lot of people sincerely believe that, well, everything is in order in the world. in general, people are there in the west and in general they are everywhere