slime is perverted and you won't understand what else . well, people are looking if there is nothing in the center. and why not go to the right from here and before lunch? yes, but it makes no sense, there is external control. and uh, they have some variations, what bidens and obamas or trumps they have there, it doesn’t matter. there is a core of the elite inside there, the core of the elite, which will govern in a simple way by changing the means of achieving power with constancy. the goals of maintaining the strengthening of power are all the cold face of such a decrepit, but debilitating master of the world, which, of course, is decrepit and he likes to talk about it, he razmiruet, but he remains the master. yes, everyone says, look, he has the fifth pigment on his hands. yes, spots on the hands, but do you see the claws?

and the claws are still the same, look, this is an old tiger, he has such yellow teeth, they are yellow, but if he squeezes, it will be bad on your throat, get ready for strength for strength, look for sources of strength in yourself your stories in your people in your experience anyway ivanovich thank you for participating in the program. well, thank you. thank you. you are always with you. hmm. this was a fragment of a conversation with the leader of the essence of time movement. political scientist sergei kurginyan. well , thank you for today that you are happy with us.

i am vinokurova svetlana petrovna, first vice-rector of the belarusian state academy of arts, doctor of philosophical sciences. e professor is on the show today. i would like to discuss topical issues of our society , related to issues of party building with issues of development and formation of the worldview foundations of our young generation, issues related to the development of science with problems related to the limitations that pose certain obstacles in the educational process. e in an attempt to achieve high levels of export period is the need for this all. er, of course you can't. skip the question. uh, uh, after

the festive atmosphere, a question concerning our belarusian women, uh, spring and the future of our country. and on the air program say, do not be silent in the studio victoria popova and tatyana shcherbina and visiting. today we have svetlana vinokurova good afternoon good afternoon. hello, svetlana petrovna is very glad to see you again in our studio a few days ago, the whole country celebrated. the first spring holiday on march 8 is dedicated to women. congratulations flew, warm words sounded, and a modern belarusian woman was written to the ministry of labor. this is a 43-year-old city dweller, how would you comment on these figures. that's 43 years old. is that too little or is it hard for me

to say? from what considerations did the ministry of labor proceed, maybe from the fact that it is important for this ministry that a woman already has work experience, and she still has the prospect of another 15 years before retirement, therefore, maybe that is why such an approach. i think that if the ministry of education had answered this, maybe it would have given a completely different characterization of a modern woman and would have emphasized that this woman is highly educated, occupying a very worthy place in the education system. if asked the science committee. he probably noted that today in the scientific field a woman occupies high places and feels worthy, if you asked the ministry of culture, probably, it would name a lot of women worthy, having titles of folk e, pleasing us. uh, so i don’t think why , uh, it’s urban affiliation and age that characterizes

a modern woman of this kind, an approach can also exist, but i think that a modern woman has much more qualities that distinguish her as a woman with beauty. eh, the subtlety of understanding, first of all, his other half of men. uh, hardworking, uh, beautiful secret clever, is that what men were talking about on march 8th? and what they repeat to us, in principle, throughout our lives, not only up to 43 years, and her much later and not only on holidays and not only the curious academy of art. watch the bias more all the same female students, among yours, but now to some specialties that were, uh, previously purely male, for example, there are sculptures, for example, where, as a rule , uh, men were recruited, uh, women appear. here but we are trying some kind of gender

equality. we also observe in this regard, because here at the theater department, e, is always recruited when the course and actors and actresses are definitely needed, and therefore try to keep those things, but the whole education system, of course, uh, prevails today. eh? uh, uh, women and in the academy of art, this is also noticeable. in design at the design department. eg. here is the faculty of screen arts, too, uh, the art department is replenished with women, uh, arts and crafts. there, we are also only women, in my opinion, i can’t say that we are alone, because in our academies , in general, the representation of the male half is preserved, but the woman. yes , it becomes more pleasant that in our company you can mention the words about men woman.

i even discuss them in all seriousness , because we know there are transgender trends in the west that are developing rapidly, and the doctor from brest, larisa denisova, to the gynecologist kusher, is sure that this trend is still doomed to failure. let's listen to her opinions of the trend that is now sitting she is doomed to rights, because everything that is created by god is yes. it will work as it should, no matter how they show us here and propagate the clothes of behavior there. here uh, parents there it is father number. uh, parent number one number two, it's all temporary. it’s temporary, it’s just now such a time, perhaps it’s also connected with some kind of transitional moments in many countries they don’t want to divert attention to something it’s not clear what, but nature is so arranged that anyway a boy will be a boy, and a girl will be a girl.

do you agree with the doctor or what is your opinion? for the next account? it was discussed this issue. in your transmission. i said it can't be what is considered a deviation in medicine norms. this time. secondly, of course, our society is traditional. even look at how we say our, uh, better half, when we talk about a woman, our weak half. we are talking about the location of the whole consists of two halves, yeah. these are 30 or more of these gender differences that the west counts today. well, you see, people compete, probably, what else to come up with, how to experiment with a person, really a person was created by nature. a person is brought up in society, but it is society that is responsible for how he perceives himself and what is happening back in the west today. and then, uh, what came to us as a wave from the west, what

was once tabooed and closed, it’s not by chance that civilization develops, probably, in this direction, but there are some, probably, as they say, a step forward and two step back. and i think the human mind, yes, and this contributes, of course, our traditional religious attitude, and gender. this is a man and a woman - it is a tradition to see it, even in the east there is. so uh in the women's house half, again half, and not a thirtieth part of what is in this house one of the thirtieth parts of a person. you will never get used to it , never and what has gone like a wave, but, probably, some kind of foam will always rush in periods of such a crisis of worldview. they always have such things on your mind. here you are talking to young people. there is a threat that these ideas will penetrate them and our

children will also begin to experiment with their e. i think we have such a pronounced trend no no, because you know theoretically, maybe perhaps one can speculate about this at the level, so to speak, of the theory of freedom of the individual , the rights of the individual in the minority, and so on, but if it concerns a specific person in a specific family. e children, i think that people very quickly sober up in this regard and choose what i have connected with the nature and tradition of our experimental societies. here we are, yes, famous people and children who suddenly, yes, succumbed to all these trends, suffer, that the media helped us in this regard, because, in principle, the spread of all these things through, uh, today's networks and media also contribute to this, but i think that uh, a healthy beginning in a person

is biological and social education. it should give completely different results and public policy. ours is such that the upbringing of our education is connected with the fact that we support what is given by nature and what, yes, well, in our culture. well, as philosophers, i would like to ask you, in general. what is the role, but these are the value on worldview foundations of the individual and in life and the transformational process , including, you know, this year at the final colleague of the ministry of education e, v. the report of the minister of education and also in the speech of the deputy prime minister in charge of this area. eh, the report began with the fact that the main task of the educational sphere is the formation of a worldview. as a philosopher, i was happy that i heard this, that hmm, it was precisely this value that was declared, ideological bad education and the formation of specialist professionals in that

or any other area of ​​education, of course, will never get away from this task, because we have specialists. we are preparing a specialist. but the fact that the worldview basis is specialists is the main task of the educational process. it is clear that, depending on the situation , the task facing the education system may also change. after the twentieth year, the president for the youth est determined the task of strengthening the training of a specialist in education who knows the basics of our legislation, so that there is no violations. this is a specific task, and the formation of a person's worldview is the formation of basic, as we say , values. eh, this task is fundamental and it is important that the specialist who will then work will go. here in this sphere of work and most of his life will work. e hmm where will his world view be directed. will he work for the good on his

part? will he, uh, the knowledge gained by him in this or that specialty, using in order for our side to prosper, so that in the next generation they will force society is more developed including the spiritual attitude, so the worldview. this is very important, of course. there are a lot of problems here , it is one thing to say to insert this task is another matter. solve it through personnel through the education system through the formation of this ideological culture, and this is, first of all, humanitarian training. this knowledge of the basics, uh history, is not accidental. today we attach great knowledge of our language and the russian language to this, because we have two languages, and it would be better if four. so this is knowledge. e, the foundations of ethical e, knowledge of logic. uh, of course, philosophy and so on. i think that in this regard, even the fact that the education system is now refusing

the balloon system imposed on us. here is our academy not much. hmm uh, i was impressed with the bologna system from the very beginning, because it's like a creative wax. uh, like a number of other specially trained. svetlana petrovna and i did not take this system very strongly with you. we talked about the fact that there are few hours of philosophy, in your opinion, at the academy and after . there was a hope that there would be more of them. well, you know, the education system is not constantly being reformed, of course, once at the university there were 240 hours in philosophy e in the humanities uh specialties was still uh, history is philosophy, in principle, there is no other philosophy besides history, there is no philosophy and modern philosophy will become history ethics was aesthetics was logic. i do not understand, in general, how it can be considered that a student does not need logic. what is the logic of those who say this, that the logic

of a person is not needed. the same basis, so to speak , and even for the stories that are today historical memory we have heard of a year of historical memory. we have experienced history. this problem of logic, above all, is not only already critical thinking from the audience. where will it come from if there is no logic? philosophy is the essence of philosophy in the rationally critical. and not primarily in hmm looking at your own beliefs from the outside, including critical uh, this makes it possible to move forward we do not freeze then on our beliefs beliefs you know this is good a soft pillow for mind. he sleeps if he is convinced to the point of fanaticism , a person does not think, and life demands precisely. mm thinking about problems. ah, today's life. she is very problematic.

it reveals its philosophicity and inconsistency with the strength of the speed with which the society is changing, or as we say, society is being transformed ; state policy. what a turbulent history to live in the modern generation, this is not the middle ages where you know 100 years 200 years passed before something changed, everything changes very quickly and is needed here. here is the same flexible very fast mind, which still must be based on logic on reason on common sense at worst. layer. here, if not on high matters and formations, then on common sense, and sometimes we lose this meaning, well, i hope that what we often say at each meeting these moments. something will change in our education system for the better, but a few more numbers on according

to the institute of sociology, from 2021 to 23, the number of belarusians who say that they are satisfied with life has increased from seventy-three percent in the twenty-first year to 81% 23. well, uh, in your opinion, what does this mean? you know , the cuts of public opinion that have become more systemic, so regular on the side, allow here is the performance of my which gives us confidence that this is how it happens. here is one side. we have been living under sanctions for almost our entire history as an independent country on the other side. here are even additional factors related to the complexity of the international situation with the pandemic. well, they did allow it in belarus due to the correctly chosen course. here is the economic development to achieve high success. so it ensures its food security and the filling of our markets with goods , domestic belarusians do not suffer from a shortage

of goods, therefore, people do not see that life is getting worse. they see an improvement in life, so they celebrate it, and this, of course, is very pleasing. uh, but as president it's too early to relax, anyway, we need to, uh, follow these things or a word of sanction. what about the scientific teaching community? have you cut ties because of this? that is, uh, as some kind of international cooperation is being established now, science, like art, you know , you should not have these national borders, there is no such national science. here, as such, purely belarusian science, since science is aimed at searching for truth, searching for new opportunities for the progress of developing new technologies, and in this respect to international operations it is essential. and of course, let's say 1945 . e in the united e. the nation

was created by unesco. this is such a special organization for the science, culture and education of this period in due time. the openness of the border gave a lot for international cooperation. a lot of funds of various kinds have arisen, and aimed at e, not only the development of joint projects, but also the propaganda of scientific achievements. in the world, therefore, of course, the possibilities were different , again within the framework of the soviet union, this a huge space, and these 15 sister republics with a single system of the russian language as a language of communication formed a very vast scientific space. science suffered very seriously with the collapse of the soviet union. so , due to a number of, so to speak, e moments, including linguistic ones, of course, many national ones. uh, the scientific community has closed its limits. here is our nearest balts. this is switched to their national

languages. right now, ukraine and so on have lost, as it were, the russian-speaking flow of this scientific information as a whole, according to experts in their time the ways of the lord e of the soviet union e. it is scientific to say that security has decreased, uh, by 30 years. we had to catch up with everything, so there was a lot in the period. here are the gains of independence of various points of view on the need to close, and for example, the fundamental sciences of the academy of sciences and the academy, of course , it has decreased, uh, academic science has stagnated , but it has not disappeared, we have retained the academy of sciences and retained university science, with regard to international cooperation. for example, even art academies. we have in the order of seventy international agreements, with the leading, of course, creative universities and countries. uh, here is the cis of russia in the first place.

well, we have, uh, we have agreements with newport and you understand, we worked and the holy active and latvia students from france from japan from the usa from the netherlands from lithuania of course from ukraine and the educational system is scientific, uh, in this regard, in to some extent, we certainly lost the western direction for a certain period, this exacerbates some such ties, but we opportunities remain. e interactions. with the russians, first of all with the cis countries , we have reoriented ourselves to the east, to china, which is moving very powerfully , including in the educational and scientific process , and in this respect we have the russian language as a language . uh, so to speak, too, our national language is used as a native

state in this respect. we are in more favorable conditions. and of course. i think that the prospect is still such, one can only sympathize with scientists who do not have the opportunity to communicate today directly, whether it is online conferences there, well, the connection is simply interrupted, here. you are there with both ukraine and lithuania, for purely political reasons, i think that this affects science, but not radically for belarus. and today we will introduce students from the baltic states with you or not? or i don’t have them at all today. the western direction is completely closed, but it’s not you who are preventing it. no, we are open. there is no initiative on their part, and many may have the initiative, but there is no opportunity. let's cuddle for a while, i remind you, we have telegram channel. say don't be silent. subscribe to ask questions. suggest guests we are in touch.

attention to the events that have become a global catalyst for chaos, extremist activity in europe , provocations, of course, religious hatred - this is legal, then after that we will look for the cause of what happened and we will analyze who tends to talk a lot, but do nothing. from the country and passport, but this is different in the author's project, this is different. watch new episodes on belarus 24 tv channel. foreigners about life in belarus are the first in general, probably when when you get to the republic of belarus, you are impressed by the cleanliness, first of all, by the cleanliness and accuracy of such, well, hospitable people. well, you don’t always

meet those who are ready, well, give you everything , tell you to invite you to visit , we present an opportunity to see and understand what is not visible through the eyes of local residents. i remember well how we arrived in minsk came out of minsk opinions, i liked the scotch, i think it's great. cool. so, lida will probably be some kind of the same, but he came to the old city for a walk, they were also impressed. these ones here are the european streets. you seem to be in prague somewhere and really liked it. watch in the program a look at belarus on belarus 24 tv channel. on the air again, say the program, do not be silent. and today our guest is the first vice-rector of the belarusian state academy of arts

doctor of philosophical sciences professor svetlana vinokurova svetlana petrovna well, in the first part we discussed various figures of the study with you. and here's another study. uh, belarusians began to trust the state media more, uh, while non-state fall almost by half, yes, from twelve percent to six, but the state is trusted. e, if in the twenty -first year 38% slightly more a year later , almost 50% half of the respondents. eh, how would you comment on such data, these data are pleasant for the state itself. especially considering the fact that the state-owned media as such. in general, all this information and interest is not so big, where you are from almost the floor. thousands of mass media registered in our country more than 400 are just state-owned. here. i know that even our students sometimes think that

we have much more state funds than non-state ones. in fact. it's not, here and uh, in this regard , given that the state media in the total volume by number. e , occupies only a third of somewhere in the mass media, the growth of trust in this small mass media is even more pleasing , therefore, the growth of trust, which the state source. eh, that's noted in this poll. uh, talking about what the state media will probably notice. uh, they did a very good job of changing the information , a lot of good broadcasts of professional copyright programs appeared. again . a lot of things have appeared on the screen, on which i am simply pleased to look, they are broadcasting well, these programs are objectively in essence and the transmission. here tell,

do not be silent ratings. they have tall people looking at them , this trust itself says that again, in the worldview of a person, the same thing happens, uh, hmm you know, psychologists say there is a mindset, but it is also a mind shift , because there is an analytical mindset, so a person analyzes to a greater extent, because this analysis information is what you believe, and i think that this is the result of the work that our entire information state system is doing. and its essence is that, as our president says, it should be open, truthful and timely, and if the information is exactly like this, especially in terms of the veracity of objectivity. i think she also attracts the trust which, like sometimes, a simple average man in the street thinks that everything is non-state. there,

the truth is not there. first of all, it's still i will support you svetlana petrovna says that 2-3 times the victim became alive on fakes. uh, the state's interest in it. there, the media is lost instantly, because the audience reacts precisely to the truth to objectivity. yes, it is very important fakes, of which there are millions prepared for all occasions, are already fakes. there is even one. and from my colleagues me asked what to do with these fakes. here we are in the education system. eh, for every occasion. here is something ready. this is nothing to do. you have to mind your own business. well, you know petrovna . excuse me, not the state media. and our opponents sometimes call it independent media, but in my opinion. this is a concept change. well, they may be independent, but independent of the truth. first of all, they have other goals, you understand, because it is impossible to be independent in society. there is always e in the independent media the customer and the source that pays for them

. you know information systems. it is not cheap in order to simply broadcast something, you need to have equipment. you need to have trained personnel. eh, you need to pay for all this and the fact that people began to understand this to a greater extent, of course, not all, because the level of ignorance. and in general , this pressure of this information, which every person experiences today, both the educated and the poorly educated, have the ability to submit. here are some fakes are also professionals are preparing. there, the institute is doing a whole lot of work on this, so that they can deal with this propaganda or anti-propaganda, but it’s nice that belarusians still have it. now the agitator does not win over the analyst in him, what a person thinks. above the issues and for that matter , uh, the level of trust means that these positions need to be strengthened. that's because the state policy in the field of information

and the position of the state in general in relation to what today comes from the mouth of the state, a person must hear, first of all, the truth, because the state is responsible for a person, and a person is responsible for the state and this registered m-m journalist who is trying to push through this or that information will not save him. uh, in this our public order, journalists and organizers of funds save. we have already made sure we had the opportunity to make sure in the previous two years. well, let's talk about party building in 2008. you head the primary cell of the public association belaya rus at the academy of arts recently , the leaders of the public association, belarus spoke of their intention to create a party with he to us the name of the founding congress will be held on march 18. how do you perceive the idea of ​​creating a new party? the leaf has already come up, the very time when it is necessary to turn the union into a party is a matter of party

building. he is objective in the country there is a party. here is my personal life. uh, most of it went through the pre-party system, when the communist party was only in our country and for almost 70 years. she is a large country of the soviet union developed in a one-party system. although before the revolution, as the party knows there were many and the games were interesting and original, and it is worth studying the conditions today. e discussion of issues of party building and history here to the revolutionary position. what kind of parties were there? here are the parties of the ussr; it relied on the peasantry. she expressed his interests of this large population of ours, then a large country, the party of the cadets. uh, this party included, basically, such an elite , you know, it was an assembly of the nobility. these were the nobles. there were representatives of the royal

family, very large industrialists. she expressed the interests of this layer. here the bolsheviks have staked on the working class, if it means the peasant party of sirs. they are land there and volya says the land, distribute it to all the peasants, then the bolsheviks are in the face. lenin said the earth should be state-owned since the twentieth year in 1920, a practically party monopoly was established in the country, that's the mind, honor and conscience of our era of the communist party, so to speak, it existed. i remember that time when at party meetings they discussed the danger of a split in the party the communist impossibility of the emergence of other parties in such a period was clear in the history of the soviet union that it largely realized the collapse of the soviet union. this is not just a threat of alignments. i'm practically in many countries, this e party has been banned. here are my colleges, for example, from estonia there, uh, people who headed institutes or former employees of the central committee for the artist. they were forced

to go abroad because they could not find any work for themselves. there is disrespect for nothing else, which means that there are also parties in belarus began to grow like mushrooms, and in this initial period there, if in the ninety-first year there were about five parties here in the ninety- sixth year there were 34 of them, and by 98 we had surpassed the pre-revolutionary period in general. in all of russia and now we have about 43 parties under 50 parties in a small country. here's to organize the party. nothing amounted to understand, it was necessary , practically dependent on the principle of 500 people, and please, there were parties or beer lovers and a party of bald people. here are the people. they realize themselves, therefore, there was a surge of this party construction. and what happened and the essence of this historical period from the

nineties to 908-2000 there showed that the parties then very clearly oriented themselves not to their programs. not on their charter, not on the stratum of the population, which they supported whose interests they expressed. here, as i did not accidentally cite the pre-revolutionary party, it was the peasants' party. it was the nobility party. they were clearly divided into two camps, one against the state, the other for the state overthrow of the state regime, so they were no different. they hit or look at the state or opposition. the popular front party, it was created in lithuania not on our territory, the congress was in lithuania abroad, the sources of funding for these parties, which embarked, er, on the path of opposition to the state, were

foreign in many ways. again, let's go back to what vadim frantsevich emphasizes that 100 years ago it was the same, that is , again, the same were the parties created in lithuania, which then began to act on belarus yes, that is, well, even here, uh -e says that lithuania created what kind of people of the lithuanian western people or our leaders began to live, so to speak, abroad, since political tours, if tourists travel back and forth , you understand money, for this purpose they expressed interests, they had one task to undermine the internal state, because 15-20 years , er some figures. a period of such active opposition later, of course, is part of the party. after about the ninety-eighth year they did not pass re-registration, the state drew attention to what they do not do in as a result of their 15 parties, here are some of

the leaders from the opposition, uh, this cohort of the party. e, they also showed themselves in terms of violation of the law, so today some even fell under e. those are legal penalties. here there are kostusov, for example, there kozlov of the leaders , who was also, as it were, one of the communist parties, got, so to speak, not because he was a member of the party, but nevertheless. he is a representative of the party, you understand, he says this once again about what the leader of which where does the leader lead his party? why is she undermining? again, the state system of the state regime is a feature today? moments is that created, uh, updated and very clear legislation in terms of, uh, what should be the party?

what are the requirements for it today and these conditions have been determined by the state, that there must be a representation , uh, within the regions of cities, the party must represent something, well, firstly, there is by the number of members such as members, so to speak , the parties in this park of beer lovers , wherein three people are really indignant, like, what a pocket party it is, because it represents a very minimum of some minuscule. maybe that's not the best. uh, the definition is in relation to the party, because it's still some sort of regimental organization. uh, svetlana , because one party is bad. in principle, you are in favor of having more of them. the prosperity of the state does not depend on the number of parties, therefore. but if a mass party, as today, under the possibility of our legislation to retain party affiliation, maybe only a trade union is there, uh, women's public organization, when

it was like that. we also had a women's party in 2008. uh, in the seventh year, the women's party ceased to exist. i remember even in one of the media. i said, is it really necessary to go to the party in order to decide that you are a woman, that's why it's public. uh, the movement remains. a very powerful and very important woman is very active in this republican organization. but here she is white rus', uh, already 15 years old. it's public. this is a very interesting experiment in our society. association, belarus is not a party. haven't been for 15 years. uh, this organization has been growing, uh, with more and more members who, uh, don't hesitate. people openly expressed their commitment to state policy and state support. the initiative - it went here, too, from the representatives of white russia , therefore, the constituent assembly held here by the district city councils will now have

a congress. this is generally a program published by witnesses, with which everyone can get acquainted, not only a member of white russia , the public united. any person should be determined in this regard. and i think it's not about the size of the party. it's their direction. they should bring people together. they must have a source. hmm not related to any foreign investment. they must work within the law. and er, of course, the essence of the party. it is sometimes said that a party is only a struggle for power. yes , the party puts forward a leader, one of the goals is cooperation with the authorities of influence on the authorities and , uh, participation in the power itself, uh, through government bodies, but this is not the only task to pass is to rally. and, of course, to work within the framework of the tasks

set by the state, especially in foreign policy. let’s also today have enough dissension in people’s heads and not everyone understands the internal task, therefore the tasks of the party are very serious, but i think that from what we are approaching, even to the founding congress. uh, this party has a future. that's how much a decade, but it meets today's task. i think it will be done. well, yes, i understand you, but speaking of that the opposition must also be part of society in order to keep the state party in good shape. again, the liberal democratic party. oleg gadyukevich. the leader says the same. and its support for the state line, and the communist party, the same rhetoric is practically white russia - this is well, of course. where are those goals? you understand this very correctly, uh, all criticism, and the whole position

should be internal, because the achievement of state goals has different paths. and here opinions may differ, and here it is, what does the government offer to society? and what can hmm offer a group of people or representatives of the people's state. eh, these paths can be different. see how often the state has turned to the opinion of the people lately. here even these polls are referendums that are held. you know , a referendum is an extremely, so to speak, measure, here is a public discussion, but the most representative and extensive state. he wants to hear these opinions and these opinions are different. look at the constitution discussed how much was there in truth? thousand songs opposition - this means a critical attitude to what is proposed. this should be a decision on the state, but not on the destruction of the state on the improvement

of state policy, but the problems of the state are many of these problems. you have to make a decision , you understand, there are people who believe that they can live on these funds and help us further abroad. we understand that the opposition, within the framework of these discussions of the dialogue platforms of the proposals of the state , is open to criticism. including. by the way, about criticism, she is the recent collegiums of the ministry culture. uh, chief of staff to the president. igor sergeenko criticized the department for shortcomings in some areas and in particular. here he pointed out a worrying lack of young, screenwriters, directors, artists, technical workers. well, after all, the academy of arts annually produces the same young directors there. where do they dress yes academy of art. let you be the directors of the drama theater of cinema and television, if it concerns the directors , the directors of the drama theaters work in the drama theater. they work and we have our graduates here

kovalchiks, for example, one in the musical theater and the other in the russian theater. they and our teachers are television directors who work on television. very. successfully. uh, film directors, uh, do not work in belarus, because there are no staff positions. we cannot distribute them there director. they work in moscow, they work in hollywood, they work for us. uh, our, or rather, a graduate running in moscow, uh, skvortsov shoots a whole series there in russia. so, of course, we are cooperating with the belarusian, but i repeat. here. uh, today this issue has intensified us, because the issue of preparing, first of all, the problems of cinema is a feature film. our directors, animation, animation, documentary work for belarusian 37 people, therefore, every year they have. i'll add less and less uh that they work.

it can only be called that, because they have to survive waiting for a new order. no. you know, documentaries and animation and animation. well, in any case, there are specialists here, and they have a job, for example, and the whole question is in the director feature films in the first place. that's because at one time, somewhere in 2010 , it was about creating creative workshops at belarusianfilm and attaching young specialists to them. to whom can we attach our issue today, if there is no molodyozhnaya studio in the cinema with milk, which is promoted by the tour and the only one here. ah, created today. uh, such a director’s studio, but as i understand it, the company’s budget for belarus is allocated in one basket and this is uh, an association, like smolka or any other

it does not add a union that will split this one basket. well, how would the budget in the film studio have their special meaning. i don't see, as it were, why a shmolka, if you can just take a young director to the film studio. if he is talented, let's make him shoot a movie , that is, well, well, for years, after all, he has to work somewhere for 2 years in his specialty as part of the fact that he learned to distribute him as a director at a film studio on a budget. today it is not possible for a director to participate in projects that are on the competitive based young director. it's not always. he can get with her, having his experience, therefore, i think that this problem is once again pointed out to colleagues will give the opportunity for more active cooperation of our academy with belarusian belarusian film is open for this and we also exchanged letters now. uh, belarusian is preparing an audience , we will have students practice there. and maybe to some you. q we will solve this issue criticism was fair i think that

it will intensify work in this direction, because what concerns the training of a specialist, we are responsible for the training. and this training is carried out at a fairly high level about it. they say student works, which are also shown on television, very successfully , the almanac of our artworks speaks about this. eh, they can work with term papers and graduates of ours, but this year the khaletsky was assigned, finally, the director at the e studio, that is, we had some steps to take and boasted of our even international means with us. eh, here representatives of the faculty of other arts. they, too, are strewn with prizes. they win festivals. movie. they are involved in this regard. it takes some more effort to have some extra here, uh. measures taken to ensure that we still have

a feature film, having a studio in which so much state money has been invested. eh, it turned out such a new impulse, and the academy is responsible for the quality of graduates, it is the quality of security. i am sure about that. and we won't be long. now let's break after a short pause for the basis, let's return to this studio. subscribe to our telegram channel. say, do not be silent all our issues. look on the belarus 1 youtube channel and on the bell website of the television and radio company and we are our guests the first project of the belarusian state academy of arts , ph. that people should be given a chance. not ours. let someone come back and say

why they come back here. what are you here with we hold a point of view, of course, people are different, who may even have run away, some of them remained and, as they say, have quieted down now there is no possibility for the unfolding of some events, some have succumbed to this influence. maybe they were not actively involved in something, but they thought that there would be no place for them here. i know from our students. e at one time in the twenties. uh, they got the money. uh, they left for kiev and they were promised that they would immediately go there, they were finishing their studies at the theater department and studying at the theater. uh, they did not take specialists there. eh, money. they weren't given more. here they are, so to speak, somewhere there at a construction site. they. uh, there were times there fell into a deep depression. in principle, they did not even participate in the twenties, because they independently wrote a statement of their own free will. uh, dropped out and went to another country in

ukraine all the time. this is probably such a category of people who, in principle , did not take part in these events, but went there, succumbed to it, or they were promised that they would pay 1,000 euros there every month they ran there, probably, this category may well, perhaps, be returned. eh, as it is rightly said here. eh, there has to be an individual approach. there are other people who have caused a lot of harm, here posts were engaged in their actions , including those of the state, they must answer, and in this respect, that the law enforcement agencies of the prosecutor's office are engaged in this, including that there is legislation for this, that the sites are open, that the state should look at these things individually. i agree with this position with this that part of the people can be returned, and may even suffer , should not just be returned and work to continue

working, but the one who pushed our country to destruction. who received money for this, but some have already received their dividends for living comfortably for a long time and hmm, the state treated them patiently or did not pay or did not attract such attention to them, because the state has many creative tasks you know, uh, a lot of trends today in every person. i always manage to get busy. uh, these people should now be fully responsible for what, uh, they did and continue to do. being abroad. uh, eating from sources. uh, here are other states not friendly to us and uh, uh, try themselves. give out energy too. eh, when they say that they heard there in some discussion sites, that we are

steam there very much. but what kind of language was hostile towards us in the twentieth year, if we offered there to calm down and find some way out of the disagreements, we were immediately warned that they would hang this one specifically, so there’s such a question here, you know whether they are cruel or not, in my opinion, no. no. i think that we are doing everything correctly, you understand, because i remember, and in our square back in the first wave of nationalism, too, when the communists were also opposed by such slogans, such as who has nowhere, it could well be seen in action and the twentieth year showed not at all peaceful moods, not a peaceful position that criticizes the authorities the shortcomings that certainly any society has is a coup that would have us just our independence and statehood, we see what is happening with our neighbors and the fact that, after all, hmm,

prudence was enough for citizens, because here the public is very important for state from law enforcement agencies from the power bloc. and, of course, the head of state, because he set this impulse as the head of state. so, in the end, we saved our country. but the threats remain impossible to relax. a how the audience reacts, that is, we understand that these are young people who periodically perceive everything. well, if they are hostile, then with a sneer, you know, maybe young people, to a lesser extent, also watch the state program on television. they, uh, feed on other sources. here, uh, related to the internet and so on, so they have a variety of information, and here is this systemic work with dialogue platforms. she is not redundant today. it is an essential form. uh, when u meet specialists directly

eye to eye experts. eh, the reaction is quite adequate. questions are asked and students are interested in mobilization issues, the guys are also interested in issues of the situation at the border. but when it's not just a conversation , facts are shown, you see, seeing a series gives. uh, the evidence is, uh, to one or the other, they're just calls and agitations. here, love your country. that goes without saying how propaganda should be based on information. here is truthful, objective, intelligible is urgently needed and the reaction is adequate, but also the experience of colleagues or is there a step from the alcoholics who left and did not receive anything in return for their yes actions, too, probably, if there is logic, and we will insist on it. oh, or you will return it to universities, then it should affect the audience. here an individual approach should

resolve all issues in this regard. young people who are studying today should think more. yeah, so the legislation should, maybe be tougher in this regard, because our students are still being lured away. and sometimes they finish five courses. but, as we have, a six-year turnover - training or four and you are already looking. eh, they left somewhere for about six months, they are promised a diploma, you will receive it, or somewhere else, they can also succumb. this means that measures should be applied to them for e. the state spent budget money on them in terms of scholarships. so he must return them. today , there is no such legislation, so they use this and western services in order to promise western diplomas and good employment, e.g., specialists that we have trained. i think that in this regard legislation still needs to be finalized, an important point. yes, svetlana petrovna, as always, a huge colossal pleasure from

communicating with you. uh, we are glad that you respond every time our invitation. we hope this will become our good tradition. good luck with our difficult, but very important. where is it thanks again tatyana shcherbina victoria popova we say goodbye to you today. goodbye. goodbye. and now svetlana vinokurova is speaking. i would like to wish you on the eve of waiting for the coming spring. uh, health, prosperity, flourishing to our country. all the best see you again. culture architecture native

project rudder men, of course, hungry let half and jumping all go away not in the yard of red love for hormones, and she is especially number one appeasement. of this legend. this is the detail of doylitva yakim for hundreds of years may sens and today the most boday, outstanding and rare for the belarusian speech of storkness the earth is a cartouche on the central resonance the design tears off, what is putin’s restlessness of the soul of kolya rode, the wives of the design, of course, do not befits teak

facts, and not jackans well-known muravans in films dokoratsiya that you look pre-tmnistic to this polats cultural projection architecture of belarus on our tv channel

the law is to be masters on your land and live in a just society in belarus