jasom our emotions we were not blown away, but music is music showing our emotions. matvey is the emotions of us strangled and already drenched. with us , yana becomes an integral puzzle of our life. music music

this is an understandable policy. hello today, let's talk about those to whom the law is not written, even last week the united states did not issue visas to russian diplomats to participate in the session, thus the americans in which they destroyed more than half a century of agreement between the federal and local authorities of the united states and also the state authorities should not repair any obstruction of travel to and from the headquarters area by a representative of member states and un officials a. also, their families were turned away by those who were heading to the headquarters, he is on duty , that is, washington now he also influences the formation of national delegations, the next episode of the diplomatic war reminded us

how the white house spits on international law and not issuing a detour this seems like the most harmless thing to do. here are the facts right now.

us-un relations are a special topic every year washington allocates more than 11 billion dollars to the organization for a fifth of the budget, hence the attitude they say, whoever pays the money is the one who pays the money. well, in general, you understand and order music and dance as he wants 82 times the americans used the right. the veto at the meetings of the un security council from the existing countries is the largest indicator, the blocking of the resolution on libya in 2019 was especially striking . the document discussed the need for a political resolution in the libyan war in the document. an air raid on the refugee camp killed about 50 people, but washington did not vote for peace

. the official position of the united nations was not given. all in all. eh, really. from the point of view of the devices , we prepare the documents of the prepared chrysance. on the agenda, it to a greater extent or always reflected the interests of western countries and , above all, the united states of america the united states of america acted precisely here in this way. of the year. the united states and ukraine opposed russia's resolution on the fight against neo-nazism abstained germany lithuania latvia estonia, as before, did not explain their position the americans did not want to, and the point is another egregious case and the murder in 2020 of iraqi general qassem suleimani , the most influential military in the middle east, nine people died as a result of an american airstrike on the baghdad airport

in iraq, and the us president openly stated that he had given the go-ahead for the operation in the name of observing american interests, the us logic is clear in any moment anywhere in the world. we can kill whoever we want and attack. we want the murder of soleimani to be called the prologue of the third world. even the hand-me-down un was forced to react by the special envoy agnescolo. mars stated that such actions violate several points at once, the charter of the kalamar organization, called for the persons who made such a decision to be held accountable because the united states did not substantiate its actions by providing the international community with convincing information about the immediate threat to life emanating from soleimani people, in addition, completely us killing of an iranian general became the first international precedent when the attacking side explained the liquidation of a foreign government official in the territory of a third country of self-defense. it's hard

to imagine. what threat did the general carry in the united states. being over 10.000 km. from washington ended traditionally the secretary of state called colomar a spreader of false reports, and what were all the legal bases for the strike? didn't update after a couple of months. he was already a new speaker, murder or massacre suleimani is, of course, blatant for a solution in the norm of international law, but the united states of america here just embarked on the path of justifying the problem of state terrorism. what happened on that early january of 1920 at the baghdad airport. it was a classic act of the state terraria of freedom, americans confuse permissiveness, often similar in spirit, but a little earlier in time , the history of the military attack on syria, congress did not give the un security council the go-ahead to strike, they were not even

informed, and the reason was us president donald trump called the chemical attack in duma the very fake one, and the blow was struck even before the start of the international investigation, they say. we have proof that powell's case is alive. my colleague ken doelian and i knew that the blood and urine samples of some of the victims of the chemical attack committed in syria last weekend got into the united states, according to us officials, the analysis of samples showed the presence, poisonous substances were in shock and antonio is buzzing, general secretary of the united nations but here, too, green banknotes. they did their job and instead of condemning the actions of the united states, he voiced, this is what i consider my duty. remind by member state. from the fathers of the need to steadily follow the un charter and international law in general, especially in those cases. when it comes to the problems of peace and security,

these issues are spelled out in the un charter. extremely clear to spit. the americans also wanted to structures in the hague, a remarkable story of the prosecutor of the hague international criminal court. short veil ben court group of lawyer, for several years dealt with the topic of torture in in afghanistan, the americans have done such a thing that the hair on end is the killing of defenseless people, aimless airstrikes. the torture rape bombing of the school hospitals in washington dc would make a long list of sins, citing it as just a part of the crimes against humanity in this country in november 2016. after preliminary investigation. muss published a report that provided evidence that under kabul there could be a secret cia prison in which torture was used, according to the report, military personnel. the us army may be involved in the mistreatment and torture of at least 61 detainees during the operation in afghanistan from may 1, 2003 to

december 31, 2014 bagram prison a separate page of american cruelty was thrown there for not being loyal and not loving democracy or for suspicion of terrorist ties, terrible torture, executions, threats of bullying people were tortured for years and they often confessed to everything that can be imagined. the american bagram prison was founded in 2002 on the territory of afghanistan during this time through it thousands of afghans marched, according to the words, they were starved. they burned their eyes with an aerosol , they didn’t let them sleep in the prison, there were no partitions for visiting the shower and the ritual, and the local soldiers filmed the process on camera , humiliating people. but there were air conditioners. but there is one caveat - the desert climate is the same as siberian in winter. it’s cold, but it’s hot in summer , and american guards turned on the air conditioners in the summer to the hottest setting, and in the winter to the coldest, in order to increase the suffering of the prisoners and once again

mock the results of the report international the court launched a full-scale criminal investigation, but the americans. immediately put in their place disobedient lawyers, us secretary of state mike pompeo will name the court a quote, untrustworthy political institutions masquerading as a legal entity, and in 2017 add that washington will cancel ben's visa of the court and even impose personal sanctions against the prosecutor, hinted at economic sanctions in address of the court if the investigations are not stopped. how do you like such a democracy, moreover, the assistant to the president of the united states, john bolton, said at the same time, that if ben of the court or other judge attorneys and officers, mousse, are investigating the united states and our allies, then we will take all necessary action. before the criminal prosecution these people teach the whole world about freedom ben of the court remained, of course, without a trial , thanks to washington for this, but even without an american visa, the prosecutor did not

come to the coast of miami, so she continued her work. true, not for long. not wanting to have enemies in the united states, the city court curtailed work due to the inconsistency of the investigation with the interests of justice in a filigree wording. solution was issued against the background of the aggravation of relations between the muz and the united states, which threatened the court with sanctions , moreover, for the first time in history, the international court directly pointed to political considerations as the basis for making its decision, but even from a political point of view, arguments. judges little convincing the court not only rewarded the us but also sent a clear message to others. the more hostile the state will behave towards the court, the more it will be safe. what fate awaited ben court woman removed from positions? some time in order to avoid the hype and now a native of the gambia works as a high commissioner in the country's representation in london to take up the investigation. no one else has dared

, we are witnessing an amazing phenomenon when one country is actually alone, as it believes the world hegemot, and can directly dictate its will to international structures, international organizations, international courts , exclusively, protecting its own interests. and we see that such a seemingly serious division of the organization united nations there is not that no resources to resist this pressure. as a matter of fact, there is no desire that what is subject to the tribunal remains only the indignation of individual human rights activists. violation of the un charter of international law, the atrocities of the soldiers of the allied coalition, washington wanted to sneeze at all this , the military leadership, by tradition, managed to avoid punishment, unfortunately. despite reports from various independent and government organizations about these heinous war crimes to seek justice and hold the perpetrators accountable for the investigation.

they were never carried out due to gross blackmail by washington the duplicity of american policy is striking in its cynicism, even when the whole world sees where the legs grow from , the perpetrators of the upheavals openly lie and consider others idiots in the eighties of the last century, the united states was especially keenly interested in nicaragua, we have repeatedly told how uncle sam's help ruined the life of a whole generation of the latin state in 1979, the revolution won in the country led by the sendinist movement of anti-american forces that came to power from the essocialists, they headed for a rapprochement by the soviet union with such a slap in the face, the white house could not stand the main goal, they immediately identified the economic collapse of nicaragua as a warning to other disobedient countries, the main means of attacking the main communications with the help of saboteurs recruited by the cia. in this regard , the united states seized control of local contras, which openly accepted

washington's help, even the date of the start of the civil war in nicaragua is considered to be august 11, 1981 october 11, 1983 was the day when the nicaraguan democratic forces were established in american miami, which turned out to be pawns in the big american game with the support of the united states and another war began, and october 11, 1983 . cia saboteurs landed in the port of carinthus, and blew it up. main oil storage. the country's explosion caused a real environmental disaster 20.000 civilians forced. they left their homes for tomorrow, hit the oil pipeline and, as if by magic, the american oil company sent a letter to the leadership of nicaragua in which regretted that we cannot provide tankers for the delivery of oil from other countries, the civilized world looked at this barbarism through the sleeves of the confrontation between the united states and nicaragua, and at some point in time, in fact, it could actually be equated, but with

an armed conflict, because supplying opponents, e, the victorious sandinista regime of the revolutionary socialist -oriented so that's supplying their opponents, who were called contrast in the eighties, the united states not only supplied weapons to nicaragua e. usa not only supplied advisers to nicaragua , in fact, the united states staged periodic armed sorties into the territory of nicaragua from the territory of neighboring honduras , there was a very large base on which they trained as mercenaries and armed terrorists were also based there. strictly speaking, american troops. well, washington went further. the latin republic was deprived of its black gold production. tankers blocked left to turn off and the third country in a couple of months in 1984 washington openly mined the main forts of the carinthian country,

sardine, and elbla at the same time, us insurance companies began to refuse insurance to companies whose ships called at the ports of nicaragua there , five foreign ships and six nicaraguan seiners were blown up and damaged by mines. some mines were magnetic, others were triggered by the sound of a ship's engine on july 27, 1986, already familiar to mousse. the hague court ruled that the united states, by its actions in nicaragua, violated a whole galaxy of international obligations. husband asked to unlock ports and to compensate for the damage caused to the latin republic, the authorities of nicaragua filed a lawsuit with the international court of justice, but washington sent it to all four parties in the proceedings, refused to participate, saying that the court did not have enough authority, and then, in corporate style, blocked the corresponding resolution of the security council. in the end, not caragua. didn't even get compensation for the damage.

and this is all the more surprising because during the sabotage the americans did not hide what they were responsible for, and the attack was needed in order to paralyze the military apparatus of the regime, and it's not all water. nicaragua was unilaterally removed from international law. did the united states suffer punishment no, even when the truth was revealed and the international court of justice ruled in the eider to unblock the ports of the united states. they simply removed this zone of their actions from international law. it turns out that the united states has long trampled on international law, violating a lot of taboos in diplomacy, politics, trying to crush the whole world under itself and force others to live according to the rules that washington itself invents, keep silent. at the same time, about lawlessness domestically by electoral fraud by a point-blank assassination in the capitol. ashley babbitt and arrests of domestic terrorists. so in the united states they called those who dared to go out into the street; today we consider the position of the united states and the west as the main

problem, creating difficulties at all azimuths, the course of washington k tat in international affairs means literally the following americans are allowed, everything and where they want even on the other side of the earth what they think is necessary, they will do to everyone else without american consent. nothing can be done even in response to direct security threats that the united states itself creates on the borders of countries morality. it suggests itself here that the united states has no morals, the promoters of democracy like to see in the actions of belarus, russia, china and many other crimes against the international law of mankind , and so on, that is, any power that cannot be influenced in the united states a priori is a threat to its national security and is awarded a dozen similar clichés meanwhile by the number of violations of crimes and trite disregard for others states a star-striped team in the undisputed leaders of our planet, making the right to lawlessness their trademark.

i hope now it will be clear to you. happily. answering a question with a question is not the best strategy, unless , of course, construction is in your blood. and you know all the answers to our questions, when you watch the group on tv, how the name cinderella sounds in belarusian, you can answer if you can, and this is a ball of thread, not a single absolutely correct answer. logic will come in handy in the third round. and here, after all, we develop knowledge, the winner trains erudition together, if not. there is an answer and you are sure of it , or simply because time is over. you suppose six? let's try, but about and two the one that you understand in

the intellectual entertainment project tower on our tv channel. good day live news with you lyudmila kazak and in this edition for each person today on constitution day in a solemn ceremony they handed over passports.