situations make you stronger. you already see things differently. this is probably the only thing for you and me that we should do to save our hearts once and conscientiously do our job , i will always pray for every child in our country and countries of all, probably all countries of the world, let's talk about the values ​​of friendship, happiness , and plans for the future in the program. say don't be silent. watch new releases on belarus 24 tv channel. new releases to realize their full potential. it seems to me that a a person who is purposeful and hardworking is persistent achieves a lot in life. well, and, of course, lucky each product is unique. here are all these crocks, all these bubbles, all this is so unique that it’s the second

such product, simply. well, i'm from more. of course, you can repeat something, some kind of character, but you can do it the same way, the second one can’t do needlework with your hands, and my mother’s seamstress awl was a failure - this is a reserve for growth. that is, you should consider, and some of your failure as, uh, probably luck, which can give you the opportunity to grow both emotionally and mentally and also grow as specialists. look, the belarusian project is on our tv channel. tv channel belarus 24 broadcasts for you around the clock, do not switch. about belarus in the country and abroad more than 100 million viewers around the world have access to watching the project

of our tv channel rus business and developing hospitable bright and festival generous picturesque and monumental sports and

team events inspiring people who live in belarus and do everything for its development, belarus can be different to understand and feel. she needs to be seen with her own eyes. and the viewers on the air of the tv channel belarus 24, watch us do witches every day, belarus is closer. this is my propaganda let's start. the main event of the last week according to the belarusian political tradition happened on friday. alexander

lukashenko lied to a big meeting of the council of ministers from the materiel. the most important thing for viewers is that the council of ministers is not only ministers. and also what is obvious is the prime minister , who is the chief minister of the government and his deputy, who are also the main ones, but a little less important - the ministers. and also the council of ministers in broad composition is the head of the presidential administration, the chairmen of the national bank and the committees of the head of the academy of sciences, and, as it is written in the law, other officials by decision of the president. now let's move on to the meeting , its main message is that despite the multitasking of the entire vertical of power, despite the complexity of the situation around us and inside , from political and sanctions to military. the main task of the government of the legislative branch. any executive branch in general, and in general the entire vertical of power, is to improve the well-being of the belarusian people, of course, special attention is paid to the fight against inflation, prices . the number one question for people is the surge

that occurred last autumn, it is absolutely impossible to allow any more. by whatever means you want, monetary regulatory administrative prices should be fair, while no less important condition is a full range on store shelves. it's a social contract of power while the notion of well -being is a bit of a tricky term, which in propaganda and ideology needs constant clarification for our audience, well-being is not an increase in income in monetary terms. that is to be measured with the sum of the salary makes very little sense. let's take a couple of very simple examples. belarusian rubles are, after all, a very different amount at different stages, and the dollar here with its exchange rate has absolutely nothing to do with it, especially since in recent years the american green paper has been as stable as possible in belarus 100 rub. today and 100 rubles. three years ago. it's very different 100 rubles. isn't it the question of the well-being of citizens - it's about what and

how many belarusians, maybe for 100 rubles. buy yourself theoretically in the conditions of what is called a dictatorship in the west, but in fact. it's just a strong decision-making power. at least tomorrow morning you can draw whatever salary you want for everyone. these are just the numbers of well-being - this is the increase in income and minimization of expenses for citizens, the second nuance. okay, let's say they started paying me the most 10,000 rubles. i happily go to a store where prices have not exploded, but there are nuances, well-being is also the widest choice of what i can really buy with my salary, they are somewhere in my fantasies, because there is no sense in my 10. there will be no , if i come to a store where the shelves are empty on paper, i can afford a lot of rich things, but in fact there is no difference 10,000 rubles. i have or a million, if i can’t spend this money anywhere, and the third nuance is the most important. you know, maybe i have a salary at 10,000 and there will be enough goods at normal prices, they will be in abundance. but i

, as a person, still want to go to work in the morning. on a good road to work in a modern office with all conveniences during the day. i want to have lunch at a decent place, and in the evening after work, pick up my daughter from school and my son from kindergarten to go to the cinema. and all this should be provided to me by someone, so that there is a road, an office, a restaurant, a school, a kindergarten, and a cinema. this is called the infrastructure that the state provides us with, because this is one of the tasks of the authorities. and it's ours too well-being, including specifically mine, and that's just the task of the government to evenly distribute income. between simply accrued money to citizens, they sent money to minimize the cost of goods for us, but they sent it. money to provide a wide range of goods for all citizens and sent money to build and maintain infrastructure. i personally do not need at least a million rubles a month, which will not be spent anywhere and anywhere - this is just a physical or virtual reflection

of the possibilities and opportunities in real life. economy for 10,000 rubles. much more than a fantasy economy even for a billion. everyone probably already has a story about how some acquaintance received a salary of 2,500 rubles in belarus. that there is 1,000 dollars and lived quite well, but went somewhere to the west and began to receive 2,000 dollars. that is, his income has doubled, but there is a nuance. at the same time, expenses quadrupled and simple mathematics suggests that, in general , the citizen began to live twice as bad, because, out of his stupidity, he did not chase wealth, but this income figure excellent balance between income and expenses. in our country, it is provided through exports. 9 1/2 million of our population is a very small market with all the enterprises and with all the organs. how many new tractors are needed in belarus this year, each viewer personally does not need a tractor now, but in general for organizations. ok then. let 100 of them be needed at mtz. not 100 tractors, but 10,000

, because they can do it. but then the task is to sell somewhere those 9,900 tractors that no one needs inside belarus, to get money and buy from someone at an adequate price what everyone in belarus really needs. we sold something to the countries of the collective west and other states, which today we consider unfriendly, and then there were sanctions and there we sell little, like little. what we buy from there is a problem. yes, this is her. well, the beauty is that all problems are solvable, if they are solved and, in general, a strategic problem, the president personally has already decided by breaking through the opening of the russian and chinese markets without any restrictions. i had a serious fracture. and if we have time, if we don't sleep, we will have plenty of the rest of russia, china. for growth now, this is why to hell with them with europe using the example of tractors and schematically in the european union

450 million people who, yes, have money nominally, that is, by the availability of money, they can buy a lot of our tractors, but there are nuances, they do not have a territory where these tractors would work there is russia where 140 million people live, which is three times less than the european one and the average russian has money. yes, less than these, but there is a colossal territory on which our tractors are needed, and there is in china , whose territory is half the size of russia, but twice the size of the european union, and at the same time lives. there are almost 1.5 billion people who, in theory , need our tractors and who the territory allows our tractors to want for our economic model. it is much more profitable to sell not 100 expensive tractors to europe, but 10,000 average-priced tractors to russia and china quality in any country. there is not only concern for citizens, but also a legal measure to protect your market from someone else's products.

it is difficult for us to supply tractors to europe because they require engines of the e5 6 standard, and so on, all the talk about environmental friendliness. this is noodles on the ears specifically on the environment. nobody cares about the scheme, a simple european concern is the first to develop some kind of new gadget. and as soon as they are ready to produce engines with it. this is becoming the standard so that no one else in europe can sell there are no engines at all, if it were specifically about ecology, then the standards should be the complete absence of emissions into the atmosphere, and everyone would be transferred back to live carts and our gost standard, like our gosts, is also a measure to protect their market. we do not introduce gosts that we ourselves cannot comply with, because this would be extremely stupid. well, we know how to make high-quality natural and well, sausage, so it is in our guest. and who doesn’t know how to do the same goodbye from our market, if we didn’t know how to do it, then this theoretically correctly gost for sausage, would have buried our

production, which could not sell anything domestically. we would not have been able to lower the gost requirements a little lower, and now the main chinese market and especially the russian market are close to us in terms of their conditions for protecting their market , their quality standards. i remember. this is more often than a measure of economic warfare. they are exactly the same quality as ours and we don't have to roam too much to enter their markets with all our products. and these are bottomless markets for our production volume, and what one russia that one china is more than able to buy from us everything that we produce, because everything they need is diversification of exports, good and necessary. but this is more of a political issue. you never know someone will begin to protect their market from us with their quality standards, but from the point of view of a strict economy they could. mother everything either to russia or china and not to bathe, but , alas, the economy is inseparable from politics, so alexander grigorievich is a great fellow, he personally resolved the issue not only with

the absence of restrictions for us on these markets, but also by creating special conditions for us. this work is political and economic work should be done by the government. everything they didn't get. have last year. we should add to this, but you see that we have solidly tied up with russia . china and iran will agree with india , the minister of foreign affairs of his area of ​​​​responsibility, is actively working. and then there's the emirates and then there are good trends in africa, and there are trends, so even for the future, uh, there is something to work on. at the same time with regards to tasks for the government. and this is the main organ executive power in the country was one more thing. in my opinion. this is an extremely important instruction from the president, but before that i will bring to the thought by the observations of a journalist it is completely normal that there was and will be a certain difference in views and most often in the views of each other among representatives of the executive branch

and leaders of the real sector. to put it simply, an official from the regimental committee and the director of the enterprise will always argue and discuss. and this one here is not a conflict, but the tension between them, those who are in high offices, and who works on earth is absolutely everywhere in the world, the director of the plant will consider that the executive committees do not fully understand how his plant should work ; they do not know all the difficulties ; they do not take into account all the nuances ; do not command immediately after universities. even the best, on the contrary, will think just those who graduated from these same universities. to the executive committees, because the government of the ministry is noted for the strategic development moreover, they are sure that the director of a particular the plant does not see the situation as a whole in the sphere does not take into account the experience of other enterprises in the sphere. and in general, he has a smaller array of data to work with, which is true. who is responsible for the result is clear that together they help each other and secure in theory.

this is exactly the case. well, in practice it often turns out that where responsibility, up to personal responsibility, is blurred, where they answer, it seems like everything is a little bit, but no one specifically comes out with krylov’s classic about the cancer swan and the pike. and this is what alexander lukashenko is saying now : i believe that the speed of adoption of economic making decisions is important in any sector of the economy, as monitoring by regions has shown, enterprises need the opportunity to make decisions themselves for the regulated conditions in which they work today slow down the whole process, so simplify as much as possible. all procedures here are procurement and issuance of certificates of finished products. let the governors maximum governors make all decisions. no need to feel sick. e them up to the president. and this fits very well into the logic of the president. and what alexander grigorievich repeats many times now is

time, what is important to be in time, if the final decision on export to change the product line on markets and competition mechanisms will be taken at the factories autonomously and without approvals, then the main thing is that this will speed up the decision-making process and, as a result of the action, when there are 10 curators over the director of the plant. of course, they will help the director to insure against mistakes, see the prospects more clearly, and so on. that is, they will make his work and the work of the plant better here. there is no doubt, but the problem of such a scheme is precisely in the speed of decision-making, if conditionally with the russian market goes to the western manufacturer of bolts and becomes available huge contract plant manager in belarus can single-handedly decide that tomorrow the bolt and nut plant will stop making nuts and start making only bolts in order to situationally maximize profits, but if the plant manager needs 10 for this approval , then he will receive them sometime , i'm sure 10 curators will tell you that you still need to switch to not only bolts, but to make at least 10% of nuts so as not to lose

competence. it will be very correct. solution. well, while 10 supervising bodies will work out a strategy, the russian contract for nuts will be taken by someone else, and then we will get a balanced decision with everyone, agreed with everyone worked out. the most correct is the best, but belated, because the very subject of discussion. this contract on the nut has long gone somewhere. does the probability of an error increase when the plant is mainly responsible for the result and it is its director who makes independent decisions, obviously yes. and of course, when not if a, when i'm sure of it, then about what, says the president will. it goes without saying that there will be nine correct decisions of factories and one wrong one, at least and there will be a surge in the statistics of wrong decisions, by the way, but on the other hand, there will be a greater effect from the decisions of the faithful and as a result we will quickly cope with the restructuring of the economy and will have time to quickly gain import independence. yes, how here the sanctions were shouted and that's it. this is

objectively difficult. and now calm down, everything is fine. the worst thing is that they calmed down. settled down there's a war somewhere pimples were pierced, and then we begin to heroically seek to catch to catch. and how much does it cost, so you can’t calm down, i asked you to give me the economy. the government governors chair the entire vertical of power, give the economy everything else, i will not involve you. time is the main thing now and now you need to take a little more risk and this is not only normal, but sometimes it is right for the heads of enterprises, why are their hands tied there, because follow the thought of the ministry from the plant requires the volume of production. the prosecutor's office demands the absence arrears from buyers,

the government requires the absence of deposits of products. at the state control warehouse. it requires maximizing the profit from the sale and there are situations when the director obviously turns out to be a stalemate, when he will definitely not fulfill someone ’s order this quarter, and an attempt to fulfill all the orders together will lead either to failure or to a violation of the law and the deadline. this is not massive, but such a problem. we also have it and it will also have to be corrected, and before at all costs, until the problem is publicly demanded to be solved by the president, because alexander grigoryevich is now in the hottest time on a strategic decision, today the president is already in iran. this year there were three more business trips to countries other than the ussr, asiambabwe and china, that is, the persian gulf, the arab world , africa and asia, the question of the alleged isolation of belarus can be considered closed, this is all nonsense and this is the most obvious. and what is less obvious and no less important, when

the unipolar democratic world finally falls, the new regional leaders will negotiate a new world order. they will need someone who will act as a link. who is respected and appreciated by both the president of russia and the head of china and the arab sheikhs and the african leaders and leaders of persia, and it is very obvious for this the number one candidate. my name is igor tur. this was my propaganda the motto of our participants is not to give up, to fight and go to the end. as far as i remember, it is necessary to say that they did not laugh at me, but laughed at me. and i chose the betty-time option. it's like i remember exactly that in this word only the letter p is doubled. each time, they surprise us with their reasoning, there are few hills. here, a

come on, he's still restored on the tower so sure of his answer. yes , of course, and they do everything possible to pick up the main prize. the main inventory is a heavy answer. women's hockey line women's hockey league absolutely right, watch an intellectually entertaining show on belarus 24 tv channel. we will introduce you to the belarusians who deliberately exchanged the city for the countryside when we left already, as we have been here for 30 years this summer will be the anniversary of 30 years in the workshop . why is this a country house? well, you could do wood carvings and clocks. well, let's say in

some kind of workshop, but at the same time live in an apartment. i like music very much. i love the horn. well, the classic i want to say that under the metal. if they work for me , their productivity is at least 300% higher, they believed in themselves and in their strength, and, overcoming all difficulties, they achieved results. in your favorite business, a modern village man . you see, your house is absolutely impossible. confuse with no other, and here i look at everything in gears. yes, well, yes, from the village on our tv channel. we tell about the most important thing from the world of science, we do what he orders us, our attention depends on his work. behavior is the ability to process information efficiently. our psyche reacts almost instantly. and this mental response

can be trained to speed up or slow down , we share interesting facts, a recipe for mental health, from a professional, once a day we solve some easy examples, these exercises and we can draw more and ask the most exciting questions. looking for them. answers to who needs to go to you. exactly. maybe too adults have symptoms. for example, there the child does not know how to play the child. difficult to run, for example, can't just run maybe questions with an emotional component. character there may be problems that a neuropsychologist can solve. yes, look at the science mania project on belarus 24 tv channel. together , let's pay attention to the events that became

the global catalyst for chaos, extremist activity in europe, provocations to inter-religious hostility - this is legal, then after that it will look for the cause of what happened and let's analyze who tend to talk a lot, but do nothing europe was multicultural and tolerant only in words the stupidity and fear of liberals does not depend on the country and passport. but this is different in the author's project is different. watch the new episodes on belarus 24 tv channel

. hello . watch the news with you lyudmila kozak live in this evening edition. a significant event for every person today, on constitution day, in a solemn atmosphere , they handed over passports