and from the side of the pro-kremlin-minded people, and therefore, additional police squads have been pulled into the center of riga, calling people to inform the responsible services. the banking crisis in the world is gaining momentum swiss credit suis bank is going to borrow up to $54 billion from the national bank of the country. after its shares fell by a record 24%. while during the auction. they fell by almost 31%. as reuters notes, the loan became the first major global bank to receive emergency bailouts since the 2008 financial crisis. the bank's shares began to decline after the publication of reports for the past year, which spoke of the flow of funds and significant shortcomings in the disclosure of financial information, the fall in shares intensified after the largest investor in the suis loan national bank of saudi arabia refused to give him more money, and undermined the credibility of

the world financial institutions bankruptcy of us banks, start silicone wellying. new information from my colleagues 15 hours on our air all the best essentially in the studio kirill kazakov and alen severely, i invite you to join our conversation. here at the bottom of the screen you see a qr-code to direct your smartphone, share your opinions. ask questions. us to our experts. we'll try to answer everything to the point. hello, good evening.

let's talk a little today abroad. well, look, i literally read half a year ago that belarus turned out to be such an international isolation, and suddenly, over the past few months, our president has already made his third visit to a country that was not part of the soviet union, even the fourth it turns out the united arab emirates zimbabwe china and today the visit to iran ended and, uh, when they also begin to count some experts, let them be so semi-confidential, or make such a raid on themselves. they always say, because look, it's such a strange autumn. beijing moscow minsk and plus tehran also gets here, and when you start counting the western press, all these capitals most often enter the so-called axis of evil, that is, in the neoliberal press market. we enter near the eyes, from the other side. we are fine

we understand that these are countries that, ah , at the moment, influence both the economy and the politics of the country, and each of them influences the politics of neighboring countries and, most importantly , the politics of the planet, probably to a greater extent. e sense than even the united states but the most interesting thing is that all the president's visits ended with the formulation of the economy is our everything. uh-huh, not politics, economics. whatever the visit of an american to africa was. it still affects , first of all, relations with the enemy with russia here, the economy of yuri konstantin, here is tehran , china, the united arab emirates, zimba, in general, is really in fact, six months ago , i would not have put these countries in one line for belarus. well , with china yes, we have a close relationship with tehran hmm president. at the end of his visit, he said that our signed agreements would bring about $100 million, and with china $3.5 billion, and zimbabwe and the united arab emirates, but all in one line, and above all

the economy. why it is such a choice of countries of the so-called far arc. this choice , uh, is, as it were, dictated by the fact that the imposed sanctions tried to prove to the whole world that we are a pariah state, that no one needs us. and this turn to the east, a turn to those countries that are waiting for us, which are ready not just to help us, which are ready to cooperate and help us go. these are precisely those states, a state that is a friendly state to us, which is tired of the fact that resources are being pumped out of them and do not give anything in return, they consider them to be third world countries there, countries that will never reach any level of development there. the same iran which how old is the boy at 43 , so this is just proof that that we are expected in these states, which can give us a lot. and what is most important, we can give support to hope and ours

, so to speak, but the obligation to be. southern partners are good, but in world politics , first of all, the world economy , this principle of marketing does not work. yes, when you drink, coke. you have, in principle, reached a certain level of life. if you choose, for example , the baikal drink, then you haven’t reached this level of life. and very many, for example, our fugitives, when they analyze visits our president. they say that the british still pumped zimba out of there, and the americans helped there. what is iranism, it is under sanctions. here. uh, it's a little, a different paradigm, or the situation really looks a little, otherwise, well, iran for a second is in 43 years under sanctions, but today it is what is the eighteenth economy of the world uh-huh i mean, it goes, so what can we talk about 43 years as boys, and he showed everyone how to resist these sanctions while in complete isolation. tried to do a full charge today. with

from the point of view of marketing, and perhaps those who say that this is something is not right, they do not understand that today the market is not a manufacturer, but a consumer market and we must turn to those who want to understand what they want and offer them something what we can give. this is where the win will be. this is modern marketing. and to go to drink only cola is, of course, wonderful, yes or use all the brands that are known. well, we are for brands and laws. why pay more for something that you can buy at a better price and not of the worst quality and, moreover, on favorable terms, so we talked, and you and kirill said that he, as it were , is turning around, going where they are waiting for us. well first of all, like, uh hmm really. we would not have reached the level of relationship that we have there in just one, uh, 2 years. yes, such an active phase of pressure in our direction. this is all systematic cooperation with us for a decade, but

let's take sergeyevich here's a question for you, and the head of state today also focused on this that, in particular, in we had a pause in relations with iran. he says we managed to overcome it. here we are now, in fact, starting a, well, a new round of relationships. and why did we have this pause and you know? will we not have such a cautious movement next to each other so cautiously, looking after such a period of calm. a difficult rather difficult question in asking why we had a really very big pause in relations and, above all, economic, trade, financial and other aspects of these relations. e. i think that this pause was caused by the general political situation, uh. i

think that at some certain e stage, which preceded e the current one. uh, obviously the relationship wasn't as relevant, but i would like to say, uh, we don't appreciate the political component of this relationship anymore. uh, before, i just think there was no political will and it is not on the other side. the last two or three years have been clearly marked. here, i agree. here , a turn to the east is clearly marked from the protruding one. and this hmm turn, so to speak, this is not a mechanical conceptual turn, but to the east, and this whole situation with iran and with our side should be considered in the context of a much larger confrontation without

the latter. we will not be able to understand the current events. you correctly spoke about, there are zimbaboys and others, but you could not but pay obvious attention, like our listeners and readers, to that hmm spectators, more precisely to the fact that for literally a few. uh, weeks our president visits visits. china two weeks later visits tehran and before that he had the head of the sco quite right, and moreover, shortly before that in february , the president was the head of the executive branch. ah, the islamic republic. iran visits china and really. what were the conversations about.

we don’t know there, and before that, for a year and a half or two and a half, it was concluded, in my opinion, a comprehensive agreement of some kind, also semi-secret, was not published, like the current materials, i’ll add, but that today the russian media reported about that before the end of march to moscow to visit. what is it about speaks? well, of course, not so much from trade and economic relations. it goes without saying. eh, of course it says. large and political component. and what is now prayerfully important now politically important is the consolidation of all those who are aware of the disastrous course of the west, personified by the united. here, watch it here in the interest club. and the sco, what we talked about, yes, the organization. yes, we expect our membership already in this organization, and the organization was above all security. quite right. and it says that

shanghai cooperation organization from an amorphous such. eh, charity, or something, of a regional organization is turning into an international one with a military-political aspect that there were negotiations on military cooperation everywhere and now they are going on . there is no doubt that we have touched on such an accelerated one. mm, the process of belarus' accession to the sco. and you generally expected that so quickly it was said that there was literally a year or two there, but we are always accustomed to focusing on such later dates. and look here for yourself samarkand was in september. decisions were made there. you will bring back the sway mentality. we already somehow discussed before the program that yes, the previous program, which was in september, when there was a summit in samarkand and

some of those present also said that this was a club of interests. and here we are, my colleagues. they insisted that it is now simply impossible in the current geostrategic situation that has developed in the world and while the president has repeatedly said that a new center of the world order is being formed, that is there is a transformation of the world order is being formed within the framework of the sco. a new center of power and now the situation that has now developed both in the economy and in politics, and those sanctions are boundless, they dictate new non-standard quick solutions. and this is dictated by the fact that belarus is already in june. see. this is called about the role of the individual in history, our colleague and says the tour wrote in his telegram channel, because look , a person has appeared whom the chinese personally trust putin and this person is president

alexander lukashenko and now, when it’s all the same someday it will collapse, the anglo-saxon world , no matter how spinning, then the economy suggests that redistribution and some kind of regional unions will begin, and he really our president will become the person who essentially started this whole story. here, well, again, i ask this question to everyone and no one can fully explain to me when our country will join the sco. it will be european. a country in the sco, or we will be an asian country in europe what is the correct name for us? i think it's possible and so and so here uh, i'm eurasian eurasian i in fact, i think that the whole thing is in the future with the eurasian continent. hardly limited. i think that our president also spoke about this, but we need to involve the brix state, that is, to form, indeed,

a real multi-speed integration. yes , yuri but tell me, in fact, after joining the sco. our country will become an asian outpost or a european wedge in the sco. well, you know, i probably would not accept one or the other, er, the wording. uh, by the way, we did it last year. uh, in the sense of following and most of our respondents uh, the stuff of professionals. those involved in one way or another in the asian trip were told that after all, this is a kind of eurasian bridge or gate, that is, in such a wording, that is, we are from the very beginning. remember this story when we wanted to promote helsinki 2. we then said that we want to become a kind of eurasian bridge that will unite the east with the west. and these are the plans from lisbon to vladivostok, then we considered greater europe as partners; now greater europe has become an enemy. that is, we are essentially

just to europe, uh, we come with a big asia well, in any case, we are now talking about the integration of the integration of the well-known thesis of the head of state, but not from lisbon to vladivostok from minsk to from brest to vladivostok i think that we still remain a european state , which has clearly articulated economic interests in africa and central asia and the far east. therefore, in this respect, we , the european state of the mouse, initially said that our policy is multi-vector multi-vector. we quite have our interests and in in latin america, we have interests all over the world, he said that we have been moving towards this notion of a far-arc country for several years. this is, in fact, what many criticized alexander lukashenko for , it must be said that even our relatives. uh, the allies of ours, this , uh, they tried to broadcast the multi-vector approach in a slightly different way, and it is also interesting to observe how our russian colleagues cover with what attention and reverence,

and the movements of alexander lukashenko in both china and iran today. well, let's still get back to the highway, andrey petrovich here we are, we are talking about what effect the next summit will give for russia, if i am not mistaken in june, it will just take place, and we will already become full members of the sco there, it will take place on its own. well, probably for the first time after the end of this world, but they realized that this organization must change. this decision was not made in samarkand, that is, six months later, after all the events identified there by re-piping. they will meet again to meet, in person. what can you expect from this. whether it will be accepted there some super important ones. uh, solution from the dot security perspective. maybe, i don't know , world peace will finally come, well, for the security organization, initially, of course, the shanghai five. yes, we remember. yes, and so on, it was all these events that took place, probably,

we will stop here. well, the first, of course, i wanted to say. here, colleagues have already discussed this issue that vector well , the multi-vector nature here is such a rather controversial issue. let's say that after all the eastern vector has been elected purely the eastern vector has been elected. well, under duress for the most part account. how well you understand it. we called first. we are in many respects the first rapprochement with the countries of the east; it is really taking place against the backdrop of endless. sanctions, first of all, the relationship of the nation of our union state as a whole, like this, as long as the brethendud system exists , by and large, the owners of this planet will be the collective west, which will determine all the rules of the game, which unfortunately, we will also be forced to play according to their m -m according to them , the collective east certainly looms in our country. we we can stand and read for a while. what will happen if this narrow currency system collapses. yes, that is , some kind of china clearly looms here with its own

currency system, most likely india , the united arab emirates, saudi arabia, which suddenly started talking sharply about the sale of oil already speaking in general. yes, the creation of some kind of eurasian monetary system, looking at how relations develop in brix or in latin america, respectively, latin america is also the richest in its reserves, first of all. are you, are you saying something like that and so no, and today what can we say? can we abandon the dollar today, of course. but today , this system has penetrated too deeply everywhere and when questions arise precisely related to the devaluation of the dollar dollar. yes, this is a system, then all states begin to immediately throw in the appropriate funds in order to support it. unfortunately, we will have to act according to the western scenario, the shanghai cooperation organization, as i said this indeed, cooperation that was created precisely on security issues. and the first. we remember this shanghai five, what happened in it globally at the very

beginning. why did this five appear at all and then one of the first contracts that was signed. it was an agreement on the demilitarization of border areas. yes, about the withdrawal of troops for 100 km, not application, and so on. what did this allow, this allowed china, first of all , to completely change its military strategy, which was from the land component redirected to the maritime component china today, by and large, it is, well, already isolated isolated by unfriendly countries, with the exception, perhaps, of the north a little bit of central e, central asia and so on. look at it works against her. what states? that is, the same osian, yes, that is, there is no such state, wherever there are no disputes about the paparcel islands and asks about the archipelago, and so on, the seychelles, where one of the options is collected along with dad, just to break this connection, then

we see the creation of this military-political or military-economic union quad, which is the same, including india is a participant in all of our main alliances and treaties. here is the same very serious disputes arise within the framework of this quad against whom it is aimed, why it is aimed, and so on , and the third echelon that it covers. this is essentially, that is, the system that has been created. on a purely pacific ocean was created purely by the anglo-saxons of no doubt, why was it created the question rather controversial isolation and not only china but in all likelihood the rest of the world from the southern part of our continent there is little research called antarctica if we look, here we talked a lot about who visited, what they visited. what kind of states are everywhere, that is, we mostly noticed, as well as we have success. we, well, we all for some reason forgot that at the end of february anthony blinkin

visited central asia and india yes, there is such a formation, five plus one. yes, what issues were resolved there, well, questions, of course, also again the first question that says security. that is , almost everything is hidden under this word today, yes, that is, as in twelve chairs, they will probably beat it this way or not, that is, it will always go away today. we see serious negotiations have taken place. with slanting zhomart. such negotiations took place for you, blinkin directly by yourself. the head of state of uzbekistan, shavkat mironovich, is where global issues were resolved, and we can and what, today we see that those who are the oil that is starting to be pumped today, kazakhstan is bypassing, first of all , the caspian pipeline consortium, then, as i understand it, the americans followed the path of the late seventies and early eighties. yes, suddenly collapse the oil market, and many say

that's what put an end to the soviet union , we start talking about security. that is china by and large. today it has access only towards the russian federation well, well, but the movement of these states is what they feared, of course, this is a forced rapprochement, which we are talking about today, well china today is not just such a shaving boy. it is impossible in any way the economy of the world the economy of the world today. this is one of the strongest fleets in the world. yes, that is, in quantity. uh combat pennants - this is in first place there are more than 300, and in terms of combat potential in second place after the united states and therefore, of course, you can’t treat it like a whipping boy. she has very serious ambitions, that i think that we were talking about the seychelles, and the pope of new guinea that ambitions are really very, very serious and they will be addressed. what role and place do we certainly have here in the shankar cooperation organization and the security

that we are talking about today, well, if you look at these agreements that have been concluded, then this is, first of all, the fight against separatism, extremism and terrorism, that is, a set of such, uh, very doubtful, well, how not dubious, but rather, so to speak , ambiguous definitions. yes, what is terrorism is still not fully defined until today, what is separatism , extremism, that is, questions precisely security. i’m not certainly very, very important, especially for solving such global issues that we are talking about today against the backdrop of a special military operation, but about who visits what, as it were, and now, uh, there was also information about china yesterday today appeared about the fact that gray pin will hold, uh, most likely an online meeting with vladimir zelensky sergeevich, what else do you think? i think it's a meeting that will be

preceded by an online conversation. this meeting with putin vladimir vladimirovich will determine the tone and essence of the conversation, but i i am absolutely convinced that the jinping will again try to explain everything to his own. viz. that 12-second-point peace plan that china has proposed to resolve this conflict, i am absolutely convinced. what exactly is the peacekeeping role of china, which, by the way, we also approve of our countries support , of course, to find some mutually acceptable ones, but it seems to me that this is unlikely to be successful, because it is not zelensky who determines, but. immediately

, mr. blinkin and others like him, of course, the united states has long made up its mind. of course it's important. here is what will happen. i think that during this very short time there will still be a lot of all sorts of undercover and political issues of resolving the negotiations, so that, uh, this online conversation is really successful, no, a sensible proposal. and we will see how to respond to this important point. well, what are all 12 points, if we really look at them, what are they basically about, they are composed with such a subtle oriental approach. firstly, we are for peace and against war, it is logical, as if everything for this, we are against uh, against uh, the imposition of sanctions because of healthy and for healthy competition in the economy is logical. we are against uh, the use of nuclear weapons for nuclear

security. yes, that is, that in these paragraphs . the most important thing is that he, who irritates everyone on the part of kiev, is earth-shaking. now tell me in general, is it typical for the chinese, in principle, to even enter into such relationships as not just watching how neighbors fight, yes, what if suddenly giving advice sharply, because many people said that china has always expresses this position. let the tigers fight. we are sitting on a mountain, and then we'll see who to deal with, but china decides to take the initiative. as far as this is characteristic, you correctly noted one of the characteristic features. eh, so to speak political, especially geopolitical behavior. eh, china, and here he is still, uh, in such a mild form, but the americans perceived this in favor of the russian federation , he points out, uh, offers some kind of plan

for resolving the conflict knowingly, knowingly. you know he won't be accepted one side that he's interested in. on the other hand, and that he will generally be rejected by the seed , everyone expressed his position on him, his position, and this shows that china is very, very close to active participation. and maybe already taking an active part. uh, let's say something else in the supply of weapons, what are we? well, we don’t officially know about this, a little bit is correct, by the way, by the way, china definitely uses iran for its own purposes in the part that concerns this relatively speaking conflict in uh, in ukraine it’s not for me personally

raises doubts, because china is extremely strengthening its position of belief, as if anticipating the state when one of the centers, when one of the centers of control will be china, the second center instead of the european union of control will be iran. if you pay attention to the concept of public security that was created more since the mid-nineties, if not the beginning of the nineties, an extremely interesting concept, then it says that there will be several control centers. china iran regarding iran more i don’t understand everything, but don’t forget that of all the countries that we talk about , there is a multi-thousandth imperial one behind iran.

history, if we say not the situation in ancient greece, when as a result of the greco-persian wars, after all , iran was defeated, it is still unknown what language would we now speak in this way? uh, answering the merits of us uh your question. i think that this proposal plan of the people's republic of china has, uh, a very serious underwater part, like an iceberg. well, how could it be in a different way, china is now becoming the most important such platform for solving the most important problems that face the worlds. it was precisely such in china that the signing of the restoration of diplomatic relations between saudi arabia and iran took place uh-huh china has put forward a peace

proposal and is ready, probably, to provide its platform for a solution. e these questions. i think that xi jinping hung online, it’s quite possible to propose a solution, here you can ask a question, which means that alexander grigorievich comes from our viewers, he was left to make a trip in july and close the ring, minsk tehran new delhi. beijing moscow-minsk. this will be a force against western usurpaths in general, in principle, india is in this. here. i didn't even take three away from it anymore. it does not know this figure. yes, in this whole figure, there is india. you know, i like it too. here in the conversation, too, there is a lot of any biopolitical geometry on this matter. well, at least a dozen of their analytical notes e. the only thing i would like is maybe, uh, as such a reverse to it from the beginning. conversations from the perspective of an analyst will indicate e what is it after all it also happens in the context of certain trends, and

the main trend is belarus in the global trend. and the global trend lies in the fact that, uh, the world is returning to the historical norm of 200-300 years ago, when asia set the dynamics for the entire planetary development, then there were opera wars and colonization. well, this is particular. eh, nevertheless this trend today. e states how uh analytics so you are from the east yes, well , the historian knows better, and the second trend, uh, which, in general, is conditionally taken as a point in the report considered a pandemic, then the events of february last year. this regionalization today, by the way, was read by one indian expert. he calls it e. minilateralism is when a small and medium-sized state cooperates on the basis of the national interests of commonality, or the similarity of the majority, of them to solve some pressing problems, and they say that this

trend will determine the near future. uh, there is a word politically, if you take your indian visa officer, who wrote there, then he himself is the main ideal the state was the soviet union, a small national state, which united for the sake of one goal to solve some problems, but if, in essence, the weakest point in this geometry. being talking today about geopolitical alliances , the president had a busy day today. he worked in tehran. the official visit has ended and, as a matter of fact, we are summing up its results as the latest news and here are the geopolitical trends and trips of the president that have been over the past few months or konstantin i started the last part with you and this night with you.

here. tell me again. i 'm still going down a bit from the geopolitical skies. down and if we're talking about the fact that this whole story, based on security, but still has an economic cushion, our people ask, well, okay. and what for us to touch it right now, to change it. i really say that we had good relations with iran. and we can remember, for example, the same samand cars that were assembled near minsk. it was just one of those results of negotiations, which were in the middle of the zero years there was the construction of some buildings, including those on the avenues. according to some dream, a very well-known construction company in iran is now , from what i, for example, saw, these are iranian sweets sold in stores, why we are interested in iran yes, and the second question itself. when will we finally abandon the dollar and start using the yuan, for example, when we have more iranian products, that is, i 'm trying to think. yes, such uh things of an ordinary person. we used to have europe we got something from europe, it was good there.

and this is again the same example of how much cola there is cool. than there it's cool that economically these countries will give us some way to give up, iran is somehow right here, but the roads parted a little. ok then. here we will not give up. we already do once, but not in the near future. it's 100%. people's contracts for international cooperation are all in dollars and the dollar. it just won't go anywhere and won't fall. this empire is a long- established empire, as for early on , you correctly named those projects. we had let’s also remember minsk’s magnet, it was an ambitious one. yes, and everything was basically prevented by sanctions , that is, we left our cooperation with iran because we and our companies were under the threat of additional sanctions, we didn’t know that then, that is. today we are moving to a new level. we are already two states that we can learn from experience. iran has how to live under

sanctions and develop. what does it mean to gain experience? how to live under sanctions? how not to become an outcast? how to remain a state that did not kneel, but tries develop, yes, that is, this case , iran does not always solve successfully, we understand this very well, that is, it has, how would we talk about the complexity of the economy, if we compare our economy with the economy of iran, then our economy is much more complicated, that is, we do not just commodity traders. yes, we trade complex, but complex goods. what is the cost of profit? that is, they also have nuclear power plants processing production for 43 years under sanctions, yes, which they, well, could not get together to such an extent. uh, to face it sanctions and develop also on the external contour. that is, they are closed. we are an open state. that is, we are not allowed to close. uh, make this circuit a country, an outcast. we turned to those who

influence we don't have it. yes, uh, we say, well, that's the way it is. yes, and any relationship between states. we measure than well in terms of commodity turnover. yes, and after each visit of the head of state, we announce specific figures. as far as we managed to agree there on one or another project at the beginning, kirill also translated them about something spoke today in tehran. is it soap or a lot? well, if we are talking about the fact that over the past year the trade turnover has grown, what about three times? three times in 2021, we can say that all that the contracts and agreements reached today will allow us to grow further . tomato paste in euroopt is sold, it remains to understand the logistics. yes, i also tried very tasty and inexpensive 75 kopecks. by the way, let's move on to the folk topic, let's say, what did you talk about? uh, the president of iran that

the supply of belazs is more powerful, and we we have been working there for a long time since 2008, in my opinion, we supply belaz vehicles of various capacities. so here is the supply of cars. the new capacity will allow for 40%. increase. and here are the economic indicators associated with their work. that is , it is also significant that many have talked about how far iran is, in fact, iranians. out to the caspian sea. we have an ally of russia also has access to the caspian sea. basically, it is a sea to cross, and the caspite is not the same big sea. i agree, well, look here is an important point, which is a very, very strategically promising path for us north south, why because this is the exit to the persian gulf - this is the exit to ice-free ports by the way, for russia this is also the main issue, because in russia there is a shortage of access to ice-free ports to imports. that is, about where where you can deliver all the time. it does not depend on

certain questions. and for us, for example, for potash salts today this is a way out of the sanctions that the baltic states have back in the west and from the impossibility of technological transshipment of our potash fertilizers that are available in the russian federation is the first point. the second thing colleagues were talking about is iran, er, the main problem. why is it technologically lagging behind today. it is in a low starting base that one must understand that 79 is a revolution. iran is not from the high-tech side has become a new islam for the americans. here, and from the e-shag regime, which was semi-colonies, they did not have any high-tech industries. iran is under sanctions, trying and trying to replace imports to reach what andrei ivanovich chernobay. you're just watching our

ethers could not be today, but e sent information that iran is in the top 5 world researchers in the field of nanotechnology. yes, moreover, here are the well-known shaheeds cheaply angrily and highly effective. andrey petrovich, tell me, in fact, literally yesterday's news that the russian military detained e. uh, american english equipment and the biggest fear of the western military is that it will be given away. and why are you going to iran, because there they will take it apart , they say, and learn how to take 43 years of boyhood, of course, in addition to this, iran or china are correctly said - these are just those states that are able to figuratively say very high-tech replicas of the problem today, which is early that china is that yes, it has a very well developed applied science. well, it is fundamental science that is a little behind, which

does not allow you to create your own. look , the soviet union collapsed 30 years ago, but due to fundamental science, russia is today one of the leading states the development of truly high-tech primarily in the military sphere. we know that if the military sphere of the state is it, in principle, capable of creating more serious serious types of serious types of weapons. which can supply to different markets, so definitely the fear is high technology. today, first of all, there is a lag, in which it goes to the microprocessor today , of course. this is taiwan, this is samsung uh, samsung is south korea, this is a development in the netherlands asdl. yes, a company that form in this there is a very serious problem that we cannot create really modern microprocessors. it's the norm there. here are five, there are ten nanometers. as of today, there is no such technology that is expensive and invested there,

let alone billions. there, with double digits already speak of trillions of dollars, of course. these are the technologies that today can get into the state, which is working on these names of technologies. they really can then provide a serious breakthrough. before with one hand to create new new. and most importantly , learn to deal with what produces opposite sides. i will add here the most important point. so, when we say, why belarus iran since 2005, there was some kind of pause, the main pause, there was because of what, because of the fact that the west manipulated us through sanctions regimes, one sanctions regime. iran has one sanctions regime for belarus and they differ all the time, and therefore we could not dock in any way after the twenty-fourth of february. west committed fundamental mistake. he led us into the single sanctions regime. and thus he himself formulated the paradigm of understanding the basis of a collective friend. lesh, we

talked last week. and in fact, a very good idea was voiced, which we have never said here, that the biggest competition between the west and china is in the field of artificial intelligence. yes and now tell me, here is artificial intelligence in the economy. that's what it is actually why the chinese are now ahead by almost 50 years and said america yes, it was an introduction by a former employee of the pentagon research center who announced, back in 2021, that china was already 50 years ahead of the united states of america in artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence. e hmm what is dangerous for the united states of america in principle for nato of the collective west is that it allows not just some chatbots to be created there. yes, there is a poem by writers of beautiful drawings to do about what allows you to develop any type of weaponry very quickly in a short time. and we we know. just recently, there was an

article published by a chinese research center. they said that if earlier e for engineers it would take about a year to develop. uh warship, now uh, artificial intelligence. it does this throughout the day. and, if cars, uh, any civilian military, that's enough. well, about 12-16 hours for the development of all the documentation is natural, uh gives uh, what is most important, and the temporary varnish is very uh, big for china , moreover, but you need to understand that the development the field of artificial intelligence is used, among other things, to assess and predict the actions of political military opponents. that is, how nato will act, for example, on the territory, it can replace. yes, yes, fully predictable. how it will develop, taking into account certain types of weapons and military equipment concentrated, for example, on the territory of poland, europe, ukraine and e, this

makes it possible, of course, to make very clear decisions for china and get ahead. uh, the collective west west is very strong afraid well. yeah interesting. and here we are, even if you look a few years ago here back, when we gathered in this studio, we always talked about what was at the core. the chemical interests of the economic ambitions of certain states of the mighty of this world , we are now saying that it is based on just this military science and military interests. here. uh, how did it happen. they used to just disguise themselves as economics and the desire to make money. this is also an economic interest. yes, it brings money. that's right, yes, that is the economy military affairs will not be tv until the economic base for anyone military affairs determines the strategy, that is, someone thinks to make money today. yeah, but someone is thinking of making money in

the future, but in order to make money in the future, you need to control a certain territory, logistics, certain resources. and therefore, if you do not invest in the military today, then someone will invest in it today and get yourself as the object of their desires, and any war that has tried to accumulate all this time without investing. military affairs here must be one. uh very an important point, uh, to emphasize when discussing artificial intelligence is that artificial intelligence is not built without people. therefore , the us national security strategy writes in black and white the main goal of the united states for technological advantage over other countries in the regions. this is to ensure the involvement of all minds in their technological processes, and involvement from other regions. no matter how the visa regime is written in black and white, that is, the creation of a favorable visa regime for

design engineers. fine. like this correlated science? how does this correlate with the sinophobia that is now developing in the us yes, when the governor of florida says that the chinese will close all the scientific centers, after all, in fact, it’s like they are simply kicking out the chinese. they are afraid of those chinese who, working in the united states, will not forget about their great motherland, but they live quite compactly around the world. we must understand that all this senophobia is associated with a certain understanding and that psychological fear which is in the public consciousness of americans. they see that they are losing. they see the strength of china and such a psychological response - this is isolationism, isolationist sentiment. here the gaels recently did a study that increased several times over

the past 10 years if 70-80% of americans in 2003. it was said that americans should be the main nation and rule everything, today only less than 60% of americans share the point of view. here is the answer for you , moreover, isolationists in one way or another or in the radical 10% of americans today, uh, are isolationists, or in a milder form, plus more than 20 percent. here you are, please, the answer, what to say, who put you in isolation? tell me please. look at the basis, for example, of a civilizational unification. the west also includes the religion of christianity and, as it were, about this. well, there is catholicism , there is orthodoxy, there is the pope, but, in principle, this is a single faith in essence, and the unification of the east. and this is a rather subtle story, because islam is buddhism here. and well, actually not prevent. here is a legit difference

to an association, for example, on the basis of the shanghai cooperation organization. the east is here, won't it be a little more difficult in terms of unification unification. well, because, well, you know perfectly well that warriors, including those on religious soil. they sprang up and radical islam. he hasn't gone anywhere. yes, i agree, i agree with you on this part as well. uh, the important thing is that you understand the question of uh religion and how much of a unifying factor it can be. she might be the unifying factor because it's a religion one, the other the third, which respects each other. they occupy a large place, relatively still in the traditional society of the east, this is understandable. the case of blaming

values, on the other hand, is the religion of religion, the rosi. if we are already in the environment of the abrahamic religions, pay attention to the entire historical process. how many wars have been and even in the bosom of one religion, then in this variety of religions a small spark is enough to ignite a flame, a real war sweeney and sheit, although one sacred book. you know? here, in fact, why did this question start, because one of the agreements signed today. it was an agreement on the recognition of halal. e mark of quality. i mean, mind you. here we are a christian country, but tolerance.

it was manifested here at the highest level as well. this is a very important point, a very important point. today, an important point even in modern islamic theology is the concept of a believer. uh, believer and non-believer, that is without faith is not the same faith wrong faith and without faith today there is a fundamental paradigm division. you look at what happened in iran. yes , they tried to raise hijabs against their traditional values, they tried to raise certain things from the outside, and lgbt gender values ​​and other things were imposed on us there. we are basically in the same boat. there is a traditional value in one way or another. uh, paradigm and form. and there is this liberal paradigm, which is forcibly imposed, including within western societies. there is also a split actually society. yes, you have to

change the concept of family to change the concept of, uh, gender and other things. other things, that is , in this regard, we are tolerant and solidary between china iran belarus russia india we have no problems here, the main problem is that fundamentalism, which, by and large , appeared rather late in islam itself. this is a certain reformist movement to sing, but the people who burn korans in sweden are also fundamentalists, in essence, in their own way. these are just the liberals who burn today the koran will burn the bible tomorrow, the day after tomorrow they will burn buddhist texts, and we still know the provocative action, of course , the burning of the koran. and as we recall 20 years ago, when the artist was interested in caricatures of the prophet muhammad, this is a provocative action, so they are not reflected. actually, those depths, well,

a religious conflict, it always stems from economic confrontation, because religion, as a form of ideology, forms the contradictions that exist in society between different groups. you can see where islamic fundamentalism has taken root. in the world's most backward economically poor regions, the world's richest regions, cars are fundamentalism. there it is. they also developed it. they supported the most poor people. they used them in our country, a stable economic country, these threats. they call them that with the word that's the concept of fundamentalism. you have to be very, very careful uh, that uh, the islamic religious regime that exists uh in iran is the implementation of islamic fundamentalist project on a shiite basis for human islam is a very characteristic idea. eh, justice. it

is expressed in a much more vivid form than in other abrahamic religions there judas from christians. even christianity, and even to a greater extent than in sunni islam. how many uprisings have there been in iran, uh, here, which took place under the slogan uh, justice, right here. we see that the implementation of the islamic veran project has such and such features, and i, as it were, uh, answering the previous question, it is also impossible consider that the current e-islamic project in iran has grown from scratch. i don't mean religion, everything is clear here. he also grew up on the economic platform of the previous regime, so here i disagreed with you, unless, let's say, an empty space in economic terms. uh, the islamic project

would be implemented to such a degree, it is relatively high. it is logical, most importantly, we will also say that the foundations of the iran energy function were laid in the regime. it lives on as the heirs of both the chinese empire and the persian empire. yes, that is just a little who identifies with transpersians, when they listen to the modern name with china, a different situation has developed china, after the cultural revolution, came out bloodless uh-huh and without roofing, this is a fact and, as they say, it was not there. the misfortune helped, what happened was played the card by the americans, the soviet card in relations with china and the americans did everything possible, the united states and in general. the west did everything possible and to raise china

when they came to their senses it was already too late gene came out of the bottle of our question. do you know what look, the americans do not hide the fact that they are trying to fight china in the future. well , they have, as it were, in journalistic language. this is almost the main enemy, but these are the allies who will fight against america and, again , they ask iran russia belarus e in such a template language, probably in reality to admit that the united states e over the past 30 years has become bogged down in some kind of his hegemon ideology . that they can actually fight from china and at the same time with iran and at the same time with russia and from europe crush, that is, they uh, thoughts are generated in their factories, such ideas that we, in principle, should suppress everyone and no one can suppress us, but this is an illusion. yes, and we see that this is an illusion. uh, every time uh, bump

into reality reality is a strong economy. china's strong armed forces reality is a failure in the twentieth year. uh, the velvet revolution in belarus failed, uh, the interchangeable authorities in russia in the twenty-fourth year. yes, these are expected failures that, uh, cause america to really, a now realize that they can no longer lead, uh, some kind of suppression of china there, iran, but they u already think not in terms of some geopolitical ideals, they think purely, pragmatic economy. of their corporations, if you take here is iran, remember, why, uh, here was the idea at the beginning to seize afghanistan and then seize it. e, iraq and yes, that is, afghanistan xxi e, 2001, then iraq 2003, their main goal was what they also spoke in plain text. we need to

capture iran because from two sides to crush it between afghanistan and cancer, because that iran has the largest deposits. uh, gas. these gas should be supplied to europe and thus we will be able to crush, but they could not go to russia in a different way. well, in principle, we know about the situation that has already developed now in the energy market of europe, you know, we are all the time in the united states. and who is behind the us transfunctional corporations? what is it, and who is behind china? but tell me a question, and for some reason it seems to me, for some reason it seems to me that e is conceived so that no matter who starts the usa , china starts, someone else will start, e, that one, so to speak master of the position so far that he wins. in any case, regardless of who wins, china, relatively speaking, or the united

states of america , which is just as much a tool in someone's hands as it can be, so we can continue. perhaps that is why we have come to the situation today, when , in the first part of the program, i found, dear analyst, the bc spoke about the fact that relatively small states are starting to unite with each other. we put our national interests at the forefront. well, probably experienced wise politicians who have a certain flair, not just with a saber unsheathed, but fly and mindlessly follow someone's commands, and uh, i'm talking now, i cite our president as an example, who, perhaps, someone i didn’t understand him, yes , when he took certain steps, he met with leaders who are not as attractive as neither coca-cola, nor coca-cola, but he traveled to meet with them. as they say, the crown did not fall and does not fall until now, and as a result, we turned out to be in the black and in

a certain win, we are certainly not alone in this current situation, how will it develop? i think that time will tell, but belarus is definitely represented , it is just all sorts of platforms where key decisions are made in the field of economics in the field of politics, but we only have to trust and remember what is most important , these are national interests that wanders every state. eh, in this world. don't be fooled. and i, probably, as a historian. i'll just say that watching how the world is changing is practically possible. every day we really were a country that

was on the outskirts of europe and now we are in the center of eurasia we confidently walk into the new day and do it to our own music music that sounds inside each of us it is everywhere the sun is out of the timid, movements at our fingertips the music inspires us to think and opens up before us a thousand roads can change the world because music can change us. inside each of us