we are accredited to a total of seventeen countries in africa. in addition, we are represented at the un office in nairoba, where the unep program is headquartered, and he is a hobbit. historically, we have developed good ties with many countries. we look the same with african countries we are actively cooperating in the united nations on many topical issues on the international agenda , such countries as algeria, e-e courts, angola, following the results of a state visit, will receive a new impetus our interaction with mozambique. well, as for specific projects. we know that these are also implemented. what are the most high-profile most high-profile recent days, of course, this is the agricultural mechanization project in zimbabwe , the heads of state during the visit officially completed the second phase of this

project and dali start the third and e according to the reaction of african countries this project and this experience interested them in the relevant positive signals by us, received assembly production is also there. of course, we currently have assembly production of tractors e mtz in egypt , the republic of south africa has an assembly production of trucks in egypt, and at this production. we have already achieved a level of localization sufficient for our equipment to be used by bonuses within the framework of the free trade agreements in force in africa. well, as for trade in general, what we bring from africa to belarus and vice versa, what belarus itself supplies, in addition to equipment, in addition to equipment, uh, our african partners are interested in our pulp and paper industry interesting our products our

steel products to african countries also. interest, uh, my food products are chemical products, and when we build relations with african countries, we proceed from the fact that our interaction is a two-way street, in addition to pure imports, but we import. for example , coffee is a seasonal fruit, and american ones are quite puppet for others. there is just a little desire and a small opportunity to show their own sovereignty and significance, plus an internal struggle for power undoubtedly. plus prepared columns soros. unfortunately. e. here in this scenario. well, no good in this phase in this phase, in which here were the most heated confrontation, every concession is a loss, because in the end a new difference was held. this is what our vertical was, we had a presidential republic, after all, it was a center

for making decisions and a person who took responsibility. there is responsibility blurred for what at all? such regimes of parliamentary republics are being established. this ruled states. there, through funding by allegographic groups of certain parties. you can always build a balance of power in this way to create a destabilization of the situation, so they did not just refuse. they were forced to abandon the decisions that they were trying to carry out, they were forced today. what we are talking about is a very shaky regime in georgia, this is a reality and at any moment destabilization can resume at the same time look at this surname of the united states of america in this particular situation with six of the state department let me remind the united states that the united states is still very harsh and uncompromisingly calling those people who went out to the capitol as internal terrorists. they are not fighters at all, but human rights and freedoms, but internal terrorists. so, for this price list, washington has the tools to punish in any country of the world whoever is responsible for the suppression

of human rights, we will find it and punish it , maybe after that. we should not, respectfully strange, not shake hands with the united states of america just because they, as they said the barrel is perceived by the rest of the world. by the way, barrel is also like a jungle they are a garden. does the united states want it or not? today they are the masters of the world. today, everything goes anyway, according to their tune at the core, as long as the british currency system stands and the dollar today plays, indeed, a leading role. and in all spheres of practically life , it is unlikely that anyone will be able to say that not to shake hands with the united states, they can do whatever they want. in principle, there are no international treaties for them. and we are fine said, just the truth they are allowed to. it is we who are trying in every possible way to get away from some direct phrases related to e in relationships, primarily in domestic

foreign policy. we are really afraid to say some extra word. look, even today they don’t talk about information warfare anymore, information warfare is already more often than something everyone talks about cognitive warfare today, and approaches to where high -tech hi-tech, yes, are then supplemented today by the following technologies of humanitarian content small iq here. on human just technology. yes, you need to make this person believe that this is the approach that allows them to do what they do. here are the new versions of the northern streams. let me remind you that the times magazine published a statement according to which a private enterprise from ukraine could be behind the explosions of the northern streams. here it is necessary to clarify, suddenly someone was absent from the information space, some laugh, the latter spin this temple because there will be a version that the fishermen blew it up when they killed the fish, but if i morher said, well, if it goes like this, the same journalist, the grower, who discovered, based on the facts of us people who walk in bely said, then. i will provide another piece of information, that is, america can

say such things due to the fact that this is america, in general, the main deep one. so putin loves our history. well, i said, i will also take an example in history. you see, they lined up, how the winners of international relations divided the world and there is no need to do any curtseys to the soviet union here one part. of the world, the united states tilted the other as the winners and as the winners they had the right to dictate, and other countries to listen to build the economy according to their model, building, trading economic relations, the movement of the population in the world was carried out at their behest, but then one second. i will finish i will tell and whom i cant. and how much money the americans spent empty wrong. he supports well supports europe germany i will say correctly, as a rule, what i say after 2 years has always been the case. here, so what i'm saying is, it's true, so then the americans subsequently won. we won this fight. they stayed.

again, as a winner, that means taking on the laurels of one of the winners in world war ii further. they won the first e in the cold war, and they continue this paradigm and use the psychology of the winner, we won all the laurels. to the winner, what's the importance now? that's what i want to say, despite this confrontation that is not taking place in the world and we are trying to build a new paradigm of international relations. here we must build the paradigm of international relations today is the principle. e, using the principles of justice and taking into account the interests of small and medium-sized states. this can be a strong side of ours, so to speak. here is shane in the shanghai group russia belarus china because if we remain in that paradigm a winner. yes, we will win and go according to the option, again we will indicate, listen completely with the soviet union made so many mistakes. uh, much more so than the us in the first place and it is precisely because of these mistakes. they

collapsed, you know, we must winners of the world on new principles. you know, when our leader lukashenka why enjoys authority in the world precisely because he knows how to show due respect in the first place. eh, to those countries where where he is nailed and indeed. secondly, to offer those conditions that we do not parasitize, and we are long-term in our respect and hmm , maintaining the balance of power in the world, and does not destroy this balance. here, indeed, if we return to undermining the northern streams from this wonderful version with the ukrainians. by the way, here i recommend a competition to announce. here are even more ridiculous versions and send them there and it will probably suit the americans, although you need to understand that they are not so stupid. so i agree that they play in their own group, so everything should be taken seriously, too, but on the other hand, what happens that they, on the one hand , are waging war with russia to the last ukrainian with the hands of ukrainians. and at the same time, for all that, they are not shy about throwing all their crimes all, uh, in the

same last ukraine, this is really so. although, probably, the version on the surface possible and most likely. well, who else benefits from the benefits of the united states of america , of course. so it's no facts on the table. as our president says, while we do not see them. so, we must definitely make sure that this is all, we just do not swallow it. and indeed sooner or later the facts were on the table. yes, but it's very important. it is very important that this story needs to be brought to an end. if we, well, say, swallow it, then, in principle, they have already swallowed the states and the scandinavians and the union are not going to. let's do a full check. russia should bring it to an end by any means. we must find out if the united states of america is someone else, but this comrade must let us be represented, who benefits? this is important. this is for the happiness of humiliating germany as the locomotive of the european union in order to finally put their tables to look for everything , sit down, the next version. believe me, it will be

such that the germans themselves made a pipe section simply of poor quality. and he himself, unable to withstand the pressure, exploded. there were no americans, no fishermen, no ukrainians there. the germans themselves exploded, they are to blame. it will be the last stage of the humiliation of the great state, so that they get closer and and the dream of charles de gaulle comes true. yes, its big version is already idiotic in terms of ukrainian. here we discussed for the first time, yes, then here is a boat with mexican drug traffickers in the north sea. e swam and exploded and you understand. it's just idiocy, but you know, erected. eh, in some common sense does not try. yes , the operation is under the control of an american expert in cooperation with european consent of germany, that's the whole answer. actually everything not this way. let's all the same hmm turn everything back, as it all happened. actually. now we will be offered any version and any version will do. and that

a ship really arrived there, two scuba gear went down. they laid out one and a half tons of explosives in their pockets, yes, and successfully carried out terrorist acts. let's see what started with you, if anything, the first version was proposed, which was and it was officially studied by the ministry of defense of the russian federation, it was officially voiced by the patrol that was done by britain this it was officially announced then that the firm britain and the united states were one firm, but look at the british diving school, it is the strongest in the world. not even an example. i'm not talking about the ukrainians polyakov, and even not even as an example, you can put it. uh, the same united states if we remember why today it is beneficial to britain until the eighties eighties to the nineties yes, in fact, until the end of the eighties , britain was the main substitute, really hydrocarbons she controlled with her british petroleum all these flows and so on and so forth i have no doubt. this is interesting in order to really extend its influence to everything

today again, if we are talking about the concept of global britain , it precisely assumes for itself, and this is what is happening against the background of the bracket exactly what the united states really does today, having fulfilled its mission in europe actually go to another region. because in this region mission accomplished can be given to the boat of britain today most likely britain will already be in charge. and this region is connected with ukraine with europe with the same with the same with the same germany, which is limited there by its bon agreements , paris moscow, where it is sovereignty in essence, and we demanded nothing in germany in fact. yes, in fact, as a foreign policy, we have no right at all. it must coordinate everything with the three victorious countries. russia is not included there today. the united states has clearly changed its vector, this is a vector on the one hand. china since the other side is more southern region. why they started talking specifically about the global south

, therefore, to say that they really did it, the united states and why it was really all britain applied to the united states there, in general rogue psychology in itself is the psychology of robbers. and be it, as they say, the good robin hood or the layer pirate francis drake , yes, they have a rogue psychology, they affect a person. if you didn't answer me, then you are weak. i would take approximately from our ears already. we even need to special services. yes, and the conclusions to be drawn. if there were any exact data, because today we can make any statements , we can make such statements as if we know for sure, then. come to us, then let's go and let us down. some conclusions of what we are talking about today is very important day today is constitution day he and we updated the perception of this day a year ago when we held a referendum. ah, the constitution has become even more in line with the spirit of the times, although there are different editions. they in different periods were adjusted to the spirit of the times. circumstances. and under our spirit, which, well, i

'm at risk so to speak, it grows stronger from year to year it goes through the test passed the test of the nineties ninety-five-sixth year we made a decision. it was the 20th year , the 22nd year a new version of the constitution happened, and that's the world. now you have talked about this a lot today, he is like a bogatyr in front of a stone, right to left, you will go straight, which is our path. maybe even so, that is our fate of the belarusians. today, taking into account those events, those processes, forecasts, which we , including today, discussed at the program one. well, the first e we decided. uh, as a nation with the fact that for us the concept of sovereignty , the ability to conduct an independent foreign and domestic policy are fundamental important. these are the things that we are ready to fight for, that is, despite the fact that we declare everywhere that we are peaceful, despite the fact that we are a donor of stability, and

peaceful negotiations are taking place on our territory. we constantly call on any parties to conflicts, not only russian ukrainian, but also other conflicts agreements. we open borders, and, despite the fact that sanctions are being imposed against us , we are conducting a mutually friendly dialogue with all partners in international e- cooperation. well, nevertheless, we are in due time, if such an hour x comes and we have to defend our country. we will be on the defensive. we are not weak, that is, our peace-loving. ah, such a position. it is not a position of weakness; it should not be perceived as a republic that is not ready to stand up for itself. that is why we keep it dry. that is why we we have a fairly combat-ready armed forces and good intelligence services. the next moment we realize that being an average european state with an open economy. we must build commercial economic relations in all parts of the world, and any country that

is ready to trade with us without detriment in our economic sense will be our trade economic partner. we will never close our economic and any of our partners who are interested in the development of belarus should support this policy and third.