jazz samples of the area are available on the website only by joining forces and demonstrating all their intellectual abilities, you can become a winner, but it seems to me that this phrase attributed to will land their main goal is to answer questions and earn money. as many points as possible.

we fell, we will not chop up the new day, and we will crush them to our music, music, i will sting intradermal us. i remind the sun i have timid music at our fingertips, for example. music can change color by bag i desktop look music inside

the water on the earth on which you live suddenly became a poison to the ukrainian authorities. it is they who demand shells with depleted uranium in order to make the territory of hostilities uninhabitable for a millennium. here birds will sing, and women will give birth to sick children, this is the future zelensky wants for ukraine. if you do not stop the arrival of humanitarian aid from the uk, he sees tanks and shells, depleted uranium ukrainians

will die disabled knife eu support and of course, this is different. and with you i am ksenia saw. hello to those who missed it , let me remind you that britain will transfer ammunition with united uranium to ukraine and is already training soldiers to work with them, the deputy minister of defense of the united kingdom said. they were goldie and you know what the ukrainian propaganda was doing at the same moment, they began to tell people about how powerful this weapon is and how powerful it is thanks to it. they will be able to get rid of the russians on ukrainian soil at the same moment, just listen. that he is not dangerous with radiation, e-e, radiation performance, because hmm, but for the russians this is what is devastatingly sad is that ukrainian

propaganda only talks about one side of the projectiles with the combined uranium. it is known that tungsten alloys have similar characteristics, but ammunition based on them is more expensive to manufacture, so shells with depleted uranium are used by those who have reserves of uranium and technologies for its processing for a minute. apparently for themselves , they decided to dispose of the combined uranium in the ukrainian black soil, you need to understand that at the storage stage, shells with combined uranium do not pose a threat, but after application they form finely dispersed radioactive dust. a logical decision is a completely logical decision, and it would be surprising if the uk transferred l-31 and l-32 shells with a tungsten core, which are much more expensive to manufacture, and they are approximately the same in terms of their armor-piercing, therefore, let everything be heavenly for russia

britain is doing the right thing. these projectiles. dangerous for only one enemy that the tankers will meet, challenger-2 on the battlefield, but what shells do not say in ukraine, combined with uranium have high toxicity and carcinogenicity, the lawyer sarzhan alepsik, on behalf of the fighters of the war and metochs , file 10 lawsuits against nato every month because of the impact of bombardments with shells combined with uranium on people's health. so far, 350 claims and compensation have been filed. for each decision made , it can amount to one million euros. there was no meanness either, and we plan to file 10 new lawsuits every month, because we need to report on every soldier who fell ill in the war. after stay basic. we have data from the results carried out in turin that there were 500 times more uranium in the bodies of our soldiers . traces of 21 heavy metals were found, but dinner uranium

is specific, and also causes times because this is a long-term weapon . 30,000 people get cancer every year. 15,000 die today, serbia ranks first in terms of cancer incidence in europe and second in the world. the use of projectiles with combined uranium during the nato aggression against yugoslavia led to the death of civilians and numerous to the deaths of nato soldiers who participated in the operation in the ninth year, the serbian claims are identical to the five hundred italian soldiers who were in the back of the ninety-ninth year in the back and mitochs, of which more than 200 were satisfied . netherlands and turkey today in our studio , doctor of military sciences professor nikolai buzin nikolay evgenievich hello good evening britain has decided to supply ukraine with

charges with combined uranium. and here's how you can comment on this situation. is today the escalation of the conflict a definite challenge, we cannot say that it is fatal? from a military point of view, well, this is one of the means of destruction, not more than that, quite effective, but not the kind of tool that can change the balance of power and greatly affect the final result of the confrontations. examples of such an application have already been spoken about this repeatedly for this yugoslavia. this is iraq and the consequences of these applications were in comparison with what was before that, and the world community knows about it, but for them, ukraine is nothing more than we call the natives. this is essentially destruction - it is already a weapon. well, as an option, they probably still don’t solve several problems: the first is to show that they are ready to go to the end , the second is that they are ready to support ukraine

with all the means they have, the third is to show, including russia, that old ammunition is dangerous for one’s own? they are for storage and for their own people, but from the natives who , in their understanding, ukrainians are subhuman, they can live like that. and if there will be infected, the territory, so what? this is not great britain, this is not the united states , this is not europe, this is an incomprehensible ukraine well, today, but again, after the fact that nuclear weapons will appear on the territory of belarus, russia is ready to place them on our territory. can belarus be called a nuclear power after that, because some of my colleagues are already leaning towards such a formulation. here's how you can comment from a military point of view we are not becoming a nuclear power. we do not have a weapons production cycle, but on our a means appears on the territory, which is an essential element of deterrence , we asked russia through the mouth of our president

that these weapons appear on our territory. in case of need at the moment, such a need and the uk recently announced its intention to supply ukraine with ammunition with a combined urang. russia will supply us with ammunition with real uranium, if they are madmen, then they will give an impetus to this process, this is the most terrible and most dangerous, so you need to step aside a little from madness and then, as soon as these ammunition explodes at the position of their russian troops, there is a war e on the territory of poland, all possible systems are deployed on a permanent basis , the united states base in europe appeared . it is literally no more than 1,000 km from us. the same germany in the same belgium, the netherlands, there are warheads, nuclear

warheads, the united states, and for some reason, when an equivalent step is taken, in principle, we do not violate anything on our territory. our ally deploys, appropriate it doesn’t even deploy the system, but stores their use - it’s not a fact that we have the power to create in our region, that we are ready to defend our territorial integrity , our independence, including using the potential of our allies, for some reason no one wants to to say, what exactly we have in common doctrine. we have a general provision for protection. we have common approaches to ensuring the national and military security of the union state. what can become, but a red line for its application. you know there is. appropriate concept

national security is the military doctrine of the union state and the military doctrine of the republic of belarus, our president has repeatedly said this only if an act of aggression is committed on our territory, some skeptics, most likely, are sitting on the tv wondering. but how equivalent is the deployment, for example, on the territory of belarus of nuclear weapons and the use by another country, but shells with combined uranium. that's how you compare it made me make this decision a war is being waged against us, the constant forcing of the borders is practically closed today, that is, all possible roads of communication will bandage everything near us , an open armed conflict is being waged, and a number of shock groups are being deployed in europe. what we must be ready for once a year, the stick shoots. this is an old saying. which many people know, but for some reason do not want to catch. its essence is impossible.

just like escalate without being punished escalate the situation of today's world understand only one fear and strength. phraseological quote the threat to the population and the environment, created as a result of local contamination of the territory with small particles of united uranium due to the use of appropriate ammunition, is not significant. so, now you will use it instead of fertilizer in your west if it is so safe. as you tell today, the un iaea research is nothing more than an excuse for the west’s crime for sharp soldiers without exception, they began to get cancer working with radioactive shells, this is completely an uncomfortable topic, when european security is not worth us, belarus can still stop it, this is their choice es is ready to respond with further sanctions. sanctions

do not frighten us frightened, but the eu understands only the language of force, so we will talk on an equal footing or is it something else, but i was with you ksenia lebedeva see you in the next program. i k downs in the hands of a book. gortali aside after aside, marvelous and worthy respect, choking with a leather layer, these are books in books , thoughts, minura live. reporting expressly improve

the voice of the people. belarus

good morning recipes from our viewers who become guests of the program is such a hobby that helps me to study my native land, and a lot of useful and interesting things.